Slashdot Mirror


"Jobs" vs. "Steve Jobs": Hollywood Takes Another Stab At Telling the Steve Jobs Story

theodp writes: Didn't like Jobs, the 2013 biopic about the life of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs starring Ashton Kutcher? Maybe you'll prefer Steve Jobs, the 2015 biopic about the life of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs starring Michael Fassbender. "Steve Jobs is a tech visionary, total dick," writes Esquire's Matt Patches in his mini-review of the just-released Steve Jobs trailer. So, is inspiring kids to become the "Next Steve Jobs" a good or bad thing?

33 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. We're All Dicks by thedonger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We're all dicks. It will inspire some to try to do it without dickness; others are going to be dicks regardless. Seriously, does anyone make it to the top without at least some dickness?

    --
    Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    1. Re:We're All Dicks by ranton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're all dicks. It will inspire some to try to do it without dickness; others are going to be dicks regardless. Seriously, does anyone make it to the top without at least some dickness?

      People call Steve Jobs a dick not because he was just a pushy businessman (like most other successful people) but because he really was a dick. He abandoned his daughter for years, which by itself is enough to show he was deep down not a good person. He chose financial success over his own child; other than murder or torture I cannot think of a worst act. It could be argued he became a better person later in life, since it appears he tried to rectify the worst thing he ever did. But financially supporting her after he had plenty of money is hardly a grand gesture.

      The world is probably a better place because Steve Jobs existed, but that only goes to show even the most deplorable people can have a very positive impact on the world.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    2. Re:We're All Dicks by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure that letting your own daughter grow up in poverty because you're too selfish to admit your paternity and pay child support goes way beyond "not being squeaky clean."

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:We're All Dicks by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, but Jobs was a quite unnecessarily big dick to pretty much everyone, including his own daughter and Woz. I mean, is parking in a disabled space and not having plates on your car really required to be successful?

      Listen to his famous Stanford speech. "Stay foolish" is terrible advice. He was lucky, until he wasn't and his own advice to trust his gut/fate/karma instead of his doctor killed him. The whole speech is actually a classic example of the reality distortion field. Parts of it are demonstrably false, other bits clearly ridiculous, but his charisma and reputation carries it. So not only is he a dick to people around him, he's also a skilled and habitual bullshitter.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:We're All Dicks by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We're all dicks.

      I dislike how this phrase is being used because I think it trivializes the extent to which Jobs was not a good person and introduces an inappropriate levity into the discussion. A much better term would have been acute sociopath.

      And another movie about Jobs? Sounds more myopic than biopic. When Hollywood starts making remakes of their failed biographies you know they've scraped through the bottom of the barrel. Most people today only know Jobs as the other Santa who introduced shiny new toys once a year. If you want to read about the interesting stuff, just check out Folklore.org. It's filled with fascinating stories written by the people who created the Macintosh. Steve Jobs even shows up a couple of times.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    5. Re: We're All Dicks by Holi · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, but it probably has a lot to do with what he is doing now.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    6. Re:We're All Dicks by Holi · · Score: 2

      Digital music was well on it's way before apple produced the iPod. And let's not forget the LG Prada which came out almost a year before the iPhone, it was the first phone with a capacitive touchscreen and that form factor.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    7. Re:We're All Dicks by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      As I understand it, he was technically within the law to do it because he simply swapped out vehicles so regularly, none of them were owned long enough to require a plate? And parking in a handicapped space? I *think* he was only caught doing that on Apple's own campus --- not out in grocery store lots or anyplace else?

      And Pixar. Basically, any place that wouldn't have got him towed. Both of those things (required to have license plates, parking in the handicapped spots) were expressions of the same attitude: "Those people can't tell me what to do." If there was a requirement, he would find a way around it because he knew better and the rules didn't apply to him.

  2. Inspire kids to be the next Woz, not Jobs by Mascot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope I won't be disillusioned by someone who has done research into Woz, but what I have heard of Woz has pretty much been all good. Seemingly kind hearted, personal integrity, not all about the money. While Jobs is the guy who lied to his supposed friend about how much he got paid for a project so he could embezzle money from said friend. I know which person I'd rather my children emulate.

    1. Re:Inspire kids to be the next Woz, not Jobs by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Steve Jobs was no saint, but he was an artist in his particular specialty. Woz, God bless him, is a great engineer and a super nice guy, but he'd still be designing hobby projects for fun and maybe have a job as a high level engineer at like HP or IBM or Intel or something today without Jobs. And that's nothing against Woz, but I just think that Woz doesn't care for that kind of success. He's probably happy he can live in some comfort, but he'd rather be an engineer than a corporate leader if he had to choose.

      Woz got a little screwed by Jobs perhaps, but are you ever truly screwed if you didn't care to begin with?

    2. Re:Inspire kids to be the next Woz, not Jobs by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Woz, God bless him, is a great engineer and a super nice guy, but he'd still be designing hobby projects for fun and maybe have a job as a high level engineer at like HP or IBM or Intel or something today without Jobs

      And isn't that a better, much more realistic goal a parent should push their kid towards than founding a global tech company? Working a well paying job that allows you to live comfortably and gives you enough free time and means to do something you enjoy at home, what more could you ask for?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Inspire kids to be the next Woz, not Jobs by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Well, you should support your child being who they are. Woz is who he is, and trying to make him into Jobs would only make him unhappy.

      However, Lil' Jobs would probably not be as happy if he didn't become Steve Jobs later in life. If his parents pushed him to be Woz-like, would he have been happy? I'm not sure he would have been.

      For one thing, it is easy to be super chill when you are a naturally talented engineer who finds happiness in working on projects in your garage. Some people are built with a more driving ambition to affect larger systems (used in the more general sense). They want to be executives so they can bring a grand vision to life, be it a corporation, mass movement, or an empire. Anything less will be frustrating for them.

      I agree that you should try and instill values of respect and a healthy sense of perspective vs. worldly ambition in your child, but the world needs leaders too.

      That's true, but realistically no one decides as a child that they will be a world leader or a CEO. Parents who drive and "prep" their kids from an early age to do so are more likely to just burn their kids out before they even get to college. Just like you said, Jobs became Jobs "later in life". Push your children to do what they enjoy, and if they have the talent and the desire to be the next Jobs, they will have the opportunity to do so.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re: Inspire kids to be the next Woz, not Jobs by DrLang21 · · Score: 2

      Given how much of a dick Jobs was, I'm not sure that he's ever been truely happy. That kind of dickishness comes from a place of insecurity.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
  3. Why does Jobs always steal the limelight? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Steve Wozniak as an engineer, and as a person in general, is much more of an inspiration to me.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Why does Jobs always steal the limelight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember Woz very tastefully saying that when Dennis Ritchie died a few days after Job's that none of what they both were doing at Apple would be possible without DMR.

    2. Re:Why does Jobs always steal the limelight? by mccalli · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thing is - there were a lot of talented hardware engineers at the time. Woz owed an awfully large amount to Chuck Peddle, for instance, and the role of MOS and Commodore is massively underplayed these days in a "history is written by the victors"-style approach. Most of the early pure engineering-led eight bit companies died a death, but Apple survived. Why is that? It wasn't due to Woz.

      I really don't want to underplay Woz and I agree with the comments, but you can see from his ventures since that the involvement of Woz does not necessarily make for a sustainable company, and Woz alone could not have created Apple.

    3. Re: Why does Jobs always steal the limelight? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Informative

      People don't want to hear it today, but Microsoft played a big part in the early growth of the Macintosh. It was a threadbare platform without Microsoft Word and Excel. Excel, in particular, was a Macintosh program for quite awhile before Microsoft had a Windows environment good enough to run it on.

  4. The legend grows by rmdingler · · Score: 2
    It's essentially a movie script that played out in reality. Poor nobodies made great by genius innovation that began in their garage.

    You have intrigue, a second act, and an untimely death to the lead role.

    This is likely not even the final rendition.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  5. Folklore.org by sarkeizen · · Score: 2

    http://www.folklore.org/

    Not a bad source for stories about Jobs dickish behavior...and before some /.er wants to point it out I'll do so. There's one story with Knuth where Steve looks like a pretty big doofus. It's been reported that Knuth has denied it - in particular in a talk by Randal Monroe's where he was present - the actual quote from Knuth though could easily be interpreted as avoiding the question rather than denying it.

  6. Re:"Musk" "Elon Musk" "Minky Musky Sly Stoaty Stoa by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll wait for the furry retelling.

  7. Jobs is admired because greed by tekrat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's face it; the reason Jobs is so admired is because we live in a "gimme gimme" world. The 1% love him because he actually did "build it" out of nothing (on the backs of thousands of other employees) -- which was their mantra while Mitt Romney was trying to prove that the 1% were the "job creators". The reality of course is that most of the very wealthy inherited their money; but that's the subject of another discussion.

    What Jobs did was bully the people below him into creating great work. He knew they could do better if they just put in that 100-hour week and ended up divorced and alcoholics. Only by destroying those below you can achieve greatness by taking credit for all their hard work.

    The 1% love Jobs because that's what they want to do; abuse everyone below them and in so doing, whip them into making something they'll be admired for.

    But they are forgetting that Steve actually did have some out-of-the-box thinking; he wasn't a total idiot, and he could sell ice-boxes to eskimos. He actually had some skill and talent and a fuckload of charisma, and that's also why people were willing to kill themselves for him.

    But the average borg-drone MBA only sees Steve being a dick, and assumes that's how he's supposed to treat his employees, and that's why America is so fucked up.

    Apple made nice things, but America can't have nice things. Unless of course, you're already fabulously wealthy.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  8. And you all thought that Bill Gates was bad... by alexjplant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Jobs hagiography and cult-like behavior surrounding Apple products from my generation ("millennials") is disturbing. If I had a nickel for the number of times that I asked somebody to click the Start button only to be met with the response "Where's that? Oh, sorry... I use a Mac at home" I'd be a billionaire. Which is more believable: that you don't know the location of a UI element that's been an institution SINCE THE DAY YOU POPPED OUT OF YOUR MOTHER THAT EXISTS ON A PLATFORM WITH GREATER THAN 90% MARKET PENETRATION or that you're not-so-subtly objecting to the hyperbolic pain and anguish that is the necessity of using Windows NT in a corporate environment? Apple's shit is just as uniquely stinky as every other tech vendor's. Their error messages are even more garbage and cryptic than Windows (ever try connecting to a CIFS-shared printer on OS X?). OS X apps crash with the same degree of regularity as Windows. And on top of all of this their UI is downright abhorrent and unapologetically dedicated to what some focus group leader perceives to be the LCD of computer users. OS X is the only desktop environment I've struggled to grok after having used at least a dozen different ones with some degree of regularity in my lifetime. Nothing about Apple at this point distinguishes it from the myriad of other offerings in the consumer IT world except for their Flavor-Aid, "Genius Bars," and pricing model. Jobs created a monster that's far greater of a threat to our freedom than M$. I can't help but think that we'd have been better off had NeXT succeeded and he hadn't had the smug satisfaction of returning to Apple and riding it up from its lowest point in history.

  9. People by msobkow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People will put up with a lot of shit if you're brilliant.

    If you're just average, they're just going to call you "Asshole!" and walk away.

    Teaching people to emulate Jobs is teaching them to be dicks, not to be brilliant.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  10. Re:Perhaps half of us are by gnasher719 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Concerning Merkel and Greece, it is kind of hard to explain to the people of your country why they would have to work more years to get their pension, so that Greeks can enjoy their pensions a bit earlier. And why they have to pay taxes so that Greeks don't have to.

  11. Re:It's just the lazy/untalented employees... by ranton · · Score: 2

    Someone is lazy and untalented if they think a father who abandoned his child is a dick? There are plenty of other examples of what a horrible person he was, but that alone is enough to damn anyone.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  12. Testing a man's character by sjbe · · Score: 2

    All of us may be dicks, but very few of us are so dickish as to fuck over even Woz.

    That's because very few of us will ever have such an opportunity. While I think most people are generally good and decent, experience has taught me that an awful lot of those same good and decent people are not above temptation. There are a lot of people (including some reading this most likely) who would screw over a friend for financial gain. People will steal if they think they can get away with it. I think Abraham Lincoln said it best - "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."

    1. Re:Testing a man's character by rockout · · Score: 2

      What you think is of little consequence, as Lincoln never said that pithy quote. http://www.greatamericanhistor...

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
  13. Re:Perhaps half of us are by asylumx · · Score: 3, Informative

    He said "We're all dicks" not "we all have dicks."

  14. Trailer left me unimpressed by bfwebster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I didn't know Jobs well, but I did have a number of direct conversations with him, sat in on meetings at NeXT with him, spent five years developing software for NeXTstep, and had many talks with people who worked closely him (again, mostly at NeXT); our last conversation was him calling me up to yell at me for an op-ed piece of mine in BYTE (Nov 94) called "Whither Nextstep?"

    With that tee-up, I'll say that Fassbender's portrayal of Jobs in this trailer pretty much falls flat. Fassbender looks too professional and lacks that burning gaze that Jobs used to such great effect, even while using up the people around him. Frankly, Fassbender comes across more like John Scully trying to act like Steve Jobs than like Jobs himself. Also, it took me a bit to realize that Seth Rogan was supposed to be playing Woz; again, the wrong vibes and aura. Frankly, I think that Jack Black with a beard would have been a better choice for Woz. ..bruce..

    --
    Bruce F. Webster (brucefwebster.com)
  15. Where is pirates of the Silicon Valley 2? by Tighe_L · · Score: 2

    Just wondering as it seems like I would like to see how they would do it.

  16. Re:Perhaps half of us are by Totenglocke · · Score: 2

    The Greek people didn't take out the loans

    No, but they voted for the bad policies that resulted in having to take out loans.

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  17. Zen and the Art of Creating Computers by Art3x · · Score: 3, Informative

    "I'm gonna see it! I want it to be as beautiful as possible, even if it's inside the box. A great carpenter isn't going to use lousy wood for the back of a cabinet, even though nobody's going to see it." This is Steve Jobs pushing the Macintosh team to redesign the circuit board because some of the spacing was ugly.

    Steve Jobs also pushed them to make it boot as fast as possible, rejected computer fans because of noise, and said a multibutton mouse would be inelegant. He went to great pains to make the Apple Store out of glass. Even his slides were Zen.

    He was a complex character. He certainly wasn't your typical businessman:

    "My passion has been to build an enduring company where people were motivated to make great products . . . the products, not the profits, were the motivation. Sculley flipped these priorities to where the goal was to make money. It's a subtle difference, but it ends up meaning everything."

  18. Really? by hduff · · Score: 2

    He was an asshat who accomplished some interesting things.

    Let's just leave it at that.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert