Slashdot Mirror


How Bad User Interfaces Can Ruin Lives

Lauren Weinstein writes: A couple of months ago, in "Seeking Anecdotes Regarding 'Older' Persons' Use of Web Services," I asked for stories and comments regarding experiences that older users have had with modern Web systems, with an emphasis on possible problems and frustrations. I purposely did not define "older" — with the result that responses arrived from users (or regarding users) self-identifying as ages ranging from their 30s to well into their 90s (suggesting that "older" is largely a point of view rather than an absolute). Before I began the survey I had some preconceived notions of how the results would appear. Some of these were proven correct, but overall the responses also contained many surprises, often both depressing and tragic in scope. The frustration of caregivers in these contexts was palpable. They'd teach an older user how to use a key service like Web-based mail to communicate with their loved ones, only to discover that a sudden UI change caused them to give up in frustration and not want to try again. When the caregiver isn't local the situation is even worse. While remote access software has proven a great boon in such situations, they're often too complex for the user to set up or fix by themselves when something goes wrong, remaining cut off until the caregiver is back in their physical presence.

10 of 288 comments (clear)

  1. Unchanging UIs? Not just for old people by mattventura · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd love interfaces that don't change every 2 weeks. Especially certain web browsers and desktop environments which seem to be plagued with such issues.

    1. Re:Unchanging UIs? Not just for old people by kbrannen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree completely. Too often we see change for the sake of change, for UI people to justify their jobs (or so it seems to me).

      My father is in his 70's and has slowly been losing his ability to figure out how to accomplish new things. He can remember things he learned as little as 5 years ago, but new things stymy him. Changing UI's have caused him to eventually give up using the computer, even his web email interface changed enough he couldn't use it any more. We considered adding voice recognition software, e.g. Dragon Naturally Speaking, but even that was to much for him to learn. Sadly, he's had to give up using the computer all together.

      I'd really like to see more software people come to realize that when something works well, to basically leave it alone. When software reaches that level of maturity, it's a good thing to leave it working. If that's boring for the developers, then go find a new software project and leave the mature product as is.

    2. Re:Unchanging UIs? Not just for old people by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "People still need it enough that we won't actually drive them away. Usually." What a ringing endorsement of a design philosophy.

    3. Re:Unchanging UIs? Not just for old people by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > When software reaches that level of maturity, it's a good thing to leave it working.

      Absolutely true. I think this runs counter to the basic business model, ,which posits that the next version be New and Exciting. (We could all think of examples of this I'm sure.) The Exciting part often being "I desperately need to do something RIGHT NOW that I USED to know how to do!"

      If software companies are upset that we're obstinately staying with older versions of their products, instead of paying for the latest and greatest, the answer might be simply "I know how to use this version, and I don't want to spend hours with each new revision trying to figure out where you've hidden the button this time." [1] It's ok to make things faster, more efficient, or add features, but Exciting New changes to the UI will slow adoption and may lose customers.

      [1] Trivial example: Mother in law in her seventies being forced to switch from Outlook Express to Windows Live Mail. She very nearly gave up on email altogether.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:Unchanging UIs? Not just for old people by tompaulco · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, but it's not like you just give up and stop using a computer when Google plays "where's the send button now?" with gmail.

      Or when Slashdot plays the "what do I click to read the comments" game?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  2. Hmm, this article is interesting... by djbckr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps Slashdot should take a cue from this article and stop messing around with the UI!

  3. Re:pardon my french, but "duh" by queazocotal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    'without cognitive impairment'.
    'cognitive impairment' is a hell of a lot more gradual than you think.

    For someone using computers a lot, they're probably going to figure it out.
    For someone not using computers a lot, and who have managed to do things by remembering exactly what to click - this is enormously fragile.
    Issues from 'I might break it' -> 'I might put it in a mode I don't understand how to get out of'

    Someone in this position may not be able to recover from an expanded list collapsing down to a tiny triangle on a mis-click, especially if this is a feature that they will never need.
    Or icons changing from ones they know, or menus moving around.

  4. Re:pardon my french, but "duh" by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think a problem is the automatic assumption many young people make that the reason why an older person doesn't use something is because it's to complicated for someone older. I claim that this is largely false, and that the reason why older people don't use the technologies is because they suck, are intrusive, unreliable and fleeting.
    Young people are less critical, and seldom think long term (and when they do, they think a year is long term).

    Why should an old person learn to use (in rapid succession) CompuServe, AOL, Yahoo, LiveJournal, Myspace, Facebook, Flicker, Pinterest, Instagram (and so on and so on), instead of his relatives putting a little effort into hand written letters and face time?

  5. Re:Therac 25 by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What happened is that people who used the system very day, day in and day out, became so fast at entering the machine settings the rate of UI events exceeded the ability of the custom monitor software written for the machine to respond correctly to them.

    Which is still to some extent a UI issue.

    But the literal "killer" is what happened next:
      1) The machine detected that it had screwed up.
      2) But the UI reported this by a cryptic error message: "MALFUNCTION nn" - where the 1 = nn = 64 error codes not only weren't explanatory, but weren't even included in the manual.
      3) And if the operator hit "P" (for "proceed") the machine would GO AHEAD AND OPERATE in the known-to-be-broken mode, giving the patient a fatal (high-power, not-swept-around) electrons rather than a 100x weaker flood of x-rays, with NO FURTHER INDICATION that something is still wrong (unless you count the patient sometimes screaming and running out of the room.)

    If 2) and 3) aren't user interface problems, what is?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  6. Re: pardon my french, but "duh" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not just computers. Plastic measuring cups have their sizes in raised plastic numbers, almost impossible to see. Packages, even for staple foods, are really hard to open. Printed instructions are in really small font. And on and on.

    I wish there was a culture of designers taking their work home to their mothers and grandmothers to see how their stuff operates in the real world. Also, every CEO should be required to call in to their company's telephone support system, use the menu, and listen to the hold music -- over their cell phones while they drive (or are driven ) to work. (Not to mention legislators being required to go to the DMV, etc., etc.) Things would change real fast...