Slashdot Mirror


China's Stock Crash: $3.5 Trillion Wiped Out, $2.6 Trillion Frozen

An anonymous reader writes: The stock market crisis going on in China is notable for the huge numbers involved. $3.5 trillion ($3,500,000,000,000) in value has been wiped out by falling prices, and over a thousand companies have forced a pause in trading. The combined value of all of these companies exceeds $2.6 trillion, and it represents about 40% of the total market capitalization. This follows attempts by the exchanges and the government to instill confidence in trading once more, but investors are still wary. The NY Times has a detailed explanation of how the market got into trouble, and why it's not likely to fix itself overnight: "Put all these pieces together, and here's what we have: a rise in Chinese share prices in the last year that seemed to be driven more by investor psychology than by anything fundamental. It is hard to see how the prices as of a month ago were justified, and easy to see why the sell-off of the last month would occur. That, in turn, implies that Chinese officials are fighting an uphill battle in their policy moves to try to stop the correction, and helps explain why their policy actions have had little effect so far."

28 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. A long time coming... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They've been building up this bubble for years, it was only a matter or time.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    1. Re:A long time coming... by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh it's gonna get better, there's a lot and I do mean a lot of bad debt in China. A lot of banks over the last two years have been trying to claim it, and suddenly find there's no assets to seize and in some cases assets have been used upwards of half a dozen times under different names. When it pops it's going to be massive, and exceptionally nasty.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:A long time coming... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They literally have whole cities just lying around idle. I mean, Spain's got one, sure, but they have several. The economy never developed sufficiently to employ people in jobs that would permit them to live in developed cities in a capitalist society... so the places rot. If they had chosen people to just move into them by merit, or hell had a lottery, the situation would be better.

      Capitalism only works when you have free markets and China is the opposite of that. When you have some businesses which clearly have state sponsorship (notably when their whole business model is lying on customs forms) the game is rigged and it doesn't work.

      Here in the USA, the robber barons perverted capitalism for their own ends. In China, whatever kind of barons they have over there are preventing it from developing, for their own ends. Same problem, from different ends.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:A long time coming... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 5, Informative

      On the up-side, the gov't has been pouring tons of money into infrastructure (partly fueling the bubble), and they still control their own currency. So they have some room to maneuver. And with a technocratic, authoritarian gov't, they have some leeway to take drastic measure that would be difficult if not impossible in a democracy. It will be interesting* to see how this plays out in the coming days and weeks.

      * BTW, about that Chinese curse "May you live in interesting times," after decades in Asia, I have yet to find a native speaker who can tell me the original Chinese. So it seems this curse is apocryphal, most likely invented by a Westerner as a joke.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    4. Re:A long time coming... by gtall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Devaluing their currency would help with exports, that's about it. Well, it will make their imports more expensive which might help their domestic industries. However, the world is already awash with Chinese goods, and the Chinese themselves know better than to rely on domestic suppliers given their "supply" problems, i.e., delivering a good that isn't some cheap knockoff or laced with chemicals you'd rather not come in contact with.

      The government has spent the last several years consolidating power and claiming they know how to run a modern kleptocracy. This pokes a hole in their bureaucratic bravado. They have spent a modest amount attempting to prop up the stock market thinking its tanking reflects badly on them. What they fear most is that the Chinese proles might hold them responsible for all the responsibility they claimed while times were good.

      If pushed hard enough, they'll create some foreign crisis to re-rally the people to cover the fact the government has no clothes. They'll have been taking notes from Putin's success in showing just how feckless is the West now that the West is all post-modern and above actually defending its principles.

    5. Re:A long time coming... by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Informative
      Someone, robber baron or not, made a metric fuckton of money in the Chinese markets over the past year.

      The most interesting factoid in the links is:

      The Chinese stock market has dropped 26% in a month and The Chinese stock market is up 83% over the last year. Both are factually accurate.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    6. Re:A long time coming... by njnnja · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The whole "Chinese ghost city" bubble tends to be misunderstood. Sure there are boondoggles in Mongolia but a lot of those ghost cities are basically extensions of boomtowns. And it is tough for people to understand just how big a boomtown in China is; Shenzen is adding almost 300,000 people every year, Tianjin almost 600,000. So the general area of Shenzen needs to build a city the size of Pittsbugh, and Tianjin needs to build a city the size of Boston *every year*. Most of those empty cities were built in anticipation of people relocating from elsewhere and have filled up quickly. And for those that haven't, with building on that massive a scale, if they build residences for an extra 100,000 people in the wrong place here and there it's hardly a sign of foolhardy building that isn't necessary *somewhere*.

    7. Re:A long time coming... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Chinese themselves know better than to rely on domestic suppliers given their "supply" problems, i.e., delivering a good that isn't some cheap knockoff or laced with chemicals you'd rather not come in contact with.

      Oh come on, the iPhone's not that bad. Yes, it's a cheap knockoff and yes it's laced with toxic chemicals, but it's still a pretty good value for the money.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:A long time coming... by polar+red · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Capitalism only works when you have free markets

      Free markets don't exist. they need an infinite amount of land, resources, perfect and complete information for all players on this market.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    9. Re:A long time coming... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Fortunately for China, this is a bubble that formed as the usual speculative excess on top of a building boom. Unlike our own latest market bubbles, the Chinese boom has created enough durable infrastructure - dams, power plants, rail lines, freight terminals, water systems - that the financial effect of this crisis will be muted and temporary. For years now, China has done all the building we have not been able to break ground on. China can build bullet train lines thousands of miles long, while we can't even start a research telescope.

      When our current tech bubble pops, the dollar will have been backed up by...social media apps?

    10. Re:A long time coming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Posting anonymously for reasons that will be clear in a moment...
       
      I work at a company that manufactures large items made from steel. Many companies in China, and the Chinese government itself, are customers of my employer.
       
      Every contract we receive from China or Chinese companies has a clause that demands our company to certify that our products that will be delivered to China contain no Chinese-made steel.
       
      I find this very interesting, indeed.

    11. Re:A long time coming... by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, it'll make junk from Wal-Mart suddenly expensive. I can't say I'm upset about that.

      And there's the guy who doesn't have any idea what happens when the poor and middle class that would be directly impacted in more than one country. Suddenly it costs more for things in the US, Canada, Europe and Asia. Suddenly, everyone but the rich and ultra rich are now struggling, and no longer buying items but rather scraping by after paying for basic necessities. Well tell me what happens when growth in the economy comes to a screeching halt because people aren't buying anything?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    12. Re:A long time coming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The growth has halted because nobody is buying anything because nobody in those countries have jobs any more.

      So every time we give corporations tax breaks, and then watch them waltz the jobs offshore, what we're doing is transferring money from the economy to the shareholders.

      It's the lie of globalization being good for anything but corporate profits which is killing our economies. Basically it transfers the value of our jobs to the corporations.

      Kill a CEO, feed a banker to the bears, and throw the lobbyists to the alligators. They're the ones fucking up the economy.

      As long as we stay on this suicidal path of assuming that sucking up to corporations and the wealthy is good for everybody else this will continue.

      The biggest lie perpetuated on mankind is modern economics and free trade. It's really just the corporations and the wealthy ripping us all off.

    13. Re:A long time coming... by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And with a technocratic, authoritarian gov't, they have some leeway to take drastic measure that would be difficult if not impossible in a democracy. It will be interesting* to see how this plays out in the coming days and weeks.

      But with a very large middle class that's become very accustomed to a middle class lifestyle... they lack the leeway to take some drastic measures that a technocratic, authoritarian government could do.

      Seriously, China isn't the same as Soviet era Russia or the current North Korea - where only the Party elite and faithful have wealth, economic influence, and access to goods. They've been liberalizing their economy over the last quarter century (which is one of main reasons for the increasing dominance of cheap Chinese good on world markets), and a lot of people have made a lot of money in the process.

      That's why the government is working so hard to stabilize the market - to keep that segment appeased. They aren't going to be very happy to be reduced to penury.

    14. Re:A long time coming... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gov't "nationalizes" the building and gives away the apartments to peasants...? If you're the gov't, you don't care if some investor loses his shirt, you want useful stuff that you can give to the masses to keep them from overthrowing you.

      The Chinese gov't doesn't define "assets" the same way as a Western banker would.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    15. Re:A long time coming... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quantitative easing didn't work the same way that literally printing money does, something that many who don't have a solid grasp of economics don't understand. QE has kept the money circulating within a very limited span, and was used in part to purchase weak loan assets from banks. While those banks held them, they created significant risk and could impact the minimum holdings required by law. The Fed doesn't have the same kind of problem, and by purchasing the assets (which, collectively, are profitable) it could strengthen the banks and increase its own profit levels. Those profits are then largely sent to the federal government.

      QE was also used to purchase a lot of Treasury bonds, but that's much more an accounting maneuver. When the Fed purchases the bonds from the Treasury, it holds them until maturity. When they mature, they're cashed in and the Treasury pays out to the Fed, which becomes part of the Fed's profits, the lion's share of which are turned over to the federal government. However, that part is closer to printing money because it increases the amount of money available to the federal government to spend in the more general economy.

      This has turned into an important revenue stream for the federal government. In 2014, the Fed sent $97 billion of its $101 billion in profits to the Treasury. That number may continue to climb for a couple of years, but will decline over time as assets draw down; of the $4.5 trillion in assets held by the Fed, some $800 billion of that is in Treasury bonds that mature by the end of 2016. Other bonds will continue to mature, and loans will be paid off. The money created by the Fed will enter circulation eventually, but it will do so over time, and not in the same way as literally printing the money would have.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    16. Re:A long time coming... by Zalbik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here in Alberta, our newest government is planning the same thing over 3 years (minimum wage increase to $15/hr from the current $10.20/hr)

      And yes the cost of some goods will go up.

      The thing is, labor cost is only a part of the cost of goods and services. So while the cost of good and services will go up, it will not go up as much as the increase in income.

      Basically this narrows the gap between the very poor and the middle / upper class. This is a good thing.

      "A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Ghandi

  2. Most stock markets ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Put all these pieces together, and here's what we have: a rise in Chinese share prices in the last year that seemed to be driven more by investor psychology than by anything fundamental

    Lately this seems to be how stock markets work.

    It has nothing to do with actual value, just the psychotic glee of investors and speculators who envision doubling their money every six months.

    The stock market has become separated from reality, with the people running the giant pyramid scheme feeling entitled to skim off the top with high-frequency trading.

    In the long term, the assumptions used in the stock market seem to be irrational, unsustainable, and pretty much impossible. And corporations are often overvalued based on valuations which is more than the company will ever earn in the next few centuries.

    Stock markets are going to fuck up our economies more than they seem to be helping. Because they stopped having anything to do with fundamentals and sane valuations a VERY long time ago.

    The stock market is a reflection of mass delusion and wishful thinking.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re: Most stock markets ... by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lately? If you believe this is a new phenomenon I have some tulip bulbs I'd like to sell you.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Most stock markets ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry, that's false. The stock market (rather accurately) reflects the earnings and intrinsic values of the underlying companies

      Wow, speaking of delusion and wishful thinking.

      Sorry, but I think you're pretty much full of shit. The market has become very separated from intrinsic values.

      It's what speculators and morons think the company will be worth in the future. Just look at any company going IPO ... it's massively overvalued, unrelated to any actual valuation ... it's priced on the manic glee of people knowing they'll sell the stock for way more than they paid, get the heck out, and leave some other idiot holding the bag.

      So much of the stock market these days is a complete fiction. Some of it is real, yes, but absolutely scary amounts of it are underwritten with bullshit, lies, and false optimism.

      And, in many cases, bullshit ratings by companies paid to give bullshit ratings.

      The financial meltdown in 2008 was caused by companies selling junk debt which had been carefully packaged to appear as if it actually had value .. which was done with the cooperation of the ratings agencies who basically lied to get their cut.

      Wall Street is a fucking Ponzi scheme, not some objective valuation. It's a business run by crooks to take the money from the rubes and move it around, ensuring they can skim off the top each time.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  3. Fear by Etherwalk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It shot up 150% fro mid-2014 and then corrected way down so that now it's only up about 75%.

    Up about 75% in a year is doing fucking awesome. It's just that the big drop from the ridiculous 150% valuation will let some people sell fear and hurt the economy a bit in the short term.

    Remember the endowment effect--people who made money during the 150% rise are now going to be complaining about how much they've *lost* even though they're still up.

    1. Re: Fear by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      The DOW Industrials are at a P/E of 16.2, historical averages since the 1880's is 16.6, there's no huge bubble or crash coming unless it's an international contagion from Greece or China that halts world economic progress.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  4. Stupid Mongolians! by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Funny

    They tear down my shitty wall street!

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  5. My limited personal experience on the subject by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My last two girlfriends were both born and raised in China ladies and neither understood very much about how financial markets work. The most recent was quite a bit interested in the stock market in the USA and China. The first one wasn't interested in the subject. My most recent ex-girlfriend, even though she had lived in America for a few years by the time we started dating, seemed to have this belief that you simply couldn't lose money in the stock market. On some level surely she had to know that losses were possible, but I think she just wrote those off as the exception to the rule. She would ask me questions about the market and it seemed to me that she believed that the stock market was free money for the taking, almost everybody got wildly rich, and the fact that I wasn't making tons of money off it (no thought at all was given to exactly how much I even had to invest) meant that I was stupid, lazy, or both. I can't prove it, but I suspect that a lot of Chinese people are like my most recent ex-girlfriend where they think that they can't possibly lose in the stock market. This kind of thinking explains why so much of the Chinese stock market was done on margin trading. Given the high amount of government control over the economy there I really can't explain how the people running the show believed that repeating the mistakes that led to the US market crash of 1929 would turn out differently. Maybe it's due to Chinese exceptionalism run wild (""We're China, so the rules don't apply to us because we're better than everybody else").

  6. Re:Unregulated capitalism at work. by Vermonter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What you are seeing is the market correcting itself. Prices are returning to what they should be. The problem is not the crash, the problem is the high prices that exist right before the crash.

  7. Chinese stocks not cheap by ebonum · · Score: 5, Informative

    As I'm writing this:
    Shanghai's average P/E is 17.31.
    ( Source: http://www.sse.com.cn/market/d... )

    Dow Jones Ind Avg P/E is 16.2.
    ( Source: http://www.wsj.com/mdc/public/... )

    1. The idea is to buy low and sell high. Prices aren't low yet.
    2. A lot of people in China bought at very high valuations and hoped to sell at an even higher level to a "greater fool" to make a profit. This is called greed, and these people are in pain. Especially since so many of them bought on margin.

  8. valuation vs value by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    $3.5 trillion ($3,500,000,000,000) in value has been wiped out by falling prices

    No value has been wiped out. What has been wiped out is valuation. There's a big difference.

  9. Bullshit! by denzacar · · Score: 4, Informative

    They literally have whole cities just lying around idle. I mean, Spain's got one, sure, but they have several. The economy never developed sufficiently to employ people in jobs that would permit them to live in developed cities in a capitalist society... so the places rot.

    You are quoting gloating "China is fallin - see?" populist Daily Mail-grade articles which have little to no relevance to reality.

    I.e. OMG LOOK AT THIS GHOST CITY! Silly Chinese peoples. Don't they know any thing? Their stupid, stupid brains.

    Meanwhile, in reality...
    It's a case of combined schadenfreude over someone's perceived failure and a situation akin to when a small turnip farmer from Lower Bumfuck comes to a BigCityTM and starts despairing at the sight of a construction yard which will surely fail cause there is no chance that 50-storey building could ever be filled with people.
    He could have planted turnips there.

    Ordos is actually an entire prefecture. Slightly bigger than South Carolina or Austria (86,752 km2).
    Population: ~1.9 million.
    Urban population: ~582,544, living in the Dongsheng District.
    That region has 16% of all coal reserves in China. And a 2nd highest income-per-capita in China.
    It has a textile, petrochemical, car, electricity generating and a building industry - all built on the back of all that coal.
    And they are using it to rapidly urbanize the prefecture - pooling all those 1.9 million people in one place.
    http://www.theatlantic.com/chi...
    http://www.vagabondjourney.com...
    http://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes...

    China is urbanizing RAPIDLY. At the rate of about 1% per year.
    How much is 1% out of 1.35 billion people, yearly? About an entire Los Angeles of people looking for home, food, work, running water, electricity... and generally better living conditions than back in their village.
    Year after year after year...

    So, China is building entire cities from scratch and half coaxing half forcing people to move there.
    Not just dropping apartment buildings or giant towers and sand islands that "someone will surely buy into" either.
    Those are planned cities with built-in infrastructure (including all those "empty" parks and highways) to support hundreds of thousands of people with tens of thousands pouring yearly into Ordos alone, on a 20-year urbanization plan.
    Many of those people coming in quite literally from the fields.

    I asked the men where they had lived before moving to their apartments in Kangbashi. One of them, a 56-year-old man named Li Yonh Xiang, spoke up. "I lived here," he said.

    Li had been born and raised just steps from the bench where he was sitting. About half of the 90-acre park had belonged to his family; the government bought the land in 2000. "When we were peasants, we lived according to the weather," Li said. "Now I live in a heated building with six floors. The city is very nice. There are many cars and buildings, but the air is very clean."

    By stick and by carrot both.
    http://europe.chinadaily.com.c...

    China's urbanization program has been forced into motion by a fiscal policy that all but demands local cities expand to remain economically solvent. According to the World Bank, China's cities must fend for 80 percent of their expenses while only receiving 40 percent of the country's tax revenue, so land sales are often used to make up the difference.

    Land is bought by cit

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens