Slashdot Mirror


European Agreement Sets Up Third Greek Bailout

An anonymous reader writes: Euro zone leaders have reached a deal that will attempt to resolve Greece's financial crisis. The deal sets up negotiations for the country's third bailout, and will require the Greek government to give up significant autonomy in financial matters. Experts have estimated that Greece could require almost $100 billion to stabilize once again. While this will be a significant cost to taxpayers in other European countries, the economic repercussions of letting Greece default on its debts would be much greater. "The agreement will call for Greece to raise taxes in some cases, parepension benefits and take various other measures meant to reduce what critics see as too much bureaucracy and too many market protections that keep the Greek economy from operating efficiently. ... Despite the agreement, Greek banks are expected to remain closed this week. The banks are acutely short of cash and Greek depositors may soon find it difficult to withdraw even small sums from ATMs."

25 of 485 comments (clear)

  1. Greeks surrender: no restructuring by l2718 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The most notable point is the that there is no firm agreement to restructure (cut) the debt. I wonder how Tsirpas will sell this to his constituents who just voted a firm "NO" to a deal without restructuring.

    1. Re:Greeks surrender: no restructuring by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> I wonder how Tsirpas will sell this to his constituents who just voted a firm "NO" to a deal without restructuring.

      Same way Bush (W) sold a tax increase to those he told "no new taxes"
      Same way Clinton sold the Defense of Marriage act to those who voted for him to continue the progress of civil rights.
      Same way Bush (GW) sold illegal immigrant-friendly policies to those who voted for him to close the border.
      Same way Obama sold the renewal of the Patriot Act to those who voted for him to kill the program.

      In short, he's a politician. I'm sure he'll manage.

    2. Re:Greeks surrender: no restructuring by l2718 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What was the Greek government thinking? that the EU will just give more money without asking for more responsible measures. Meanwhile the European Central Bank maintains a freeze on emergency liquidity assistance. Tsipras had a popular mandate to say NO, he said yes. Game over!

      No -- the Greek government was thinking that they (Greece) needed to implement serious reforms, and that they have already achieved primary surplus. However, given the state of their economy the would never be able to pay back most of the debt. So what they needed was (1) forgiveness ("restructuring") for a big chunk of the debt (2) a bridge loan until the reforms kick in and the economy recovers enough. Some of the loans would be eventually paid, but much shouldn't be (and the lenders should have known better).

      What the EU wants instead is (1) the pipe dream of Greece paying back everything and (2) higher taxes and lower pensions now to help this repayment. In other words, for the EU the goal of any reforms is not to get Greece back on its feet but to extract money from it to pay back the loans.

      So, the question was not on whether reforms were needed before any further loans (which was universally agreed upon), but rather on the goals. What Greece capitulated was not on agreeing to the reforms, but on accepting that notion that they will try to pay back loans despite knowing full well that they will never be able to afford to.

    3. Re:Greeks surrender: no restructuring by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The EU is out of touch if they think Greece can pay it back and that more austerity measures will grow Greece's economy. Notice how there's no claw-back from Goldman Sachs which helped hide Greece's debt and helped double it.

    4. Re:Greeks surrender: no restructuring by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The most notable point is the European countries would not face such horrific economic crisis without a unified currency. Greece would be in crisis; the Kronor and Franc and DM and dollar and Pound and Piece would be strong; tourists would show up with pocket change, scraps to throw the Greeks, staying in lavish hotels and buying expensive trinkets and high-dollar food for cheap; the influx of money toward Greek tourism and Greek exports would help support and rebuild the Greek economy; the sudden access to cheap Greek imports would improve the wealth of neighbors (instead of weakening their economy) by the principle of comparative advantage (and its genesis principle, the unifying economic theory which I developed to explain how wealth works); and everyone--Greece and the other Euro neighbors--would experience much less pain (Greece by more rapid recovery thanks to the more dramatic shift in trade advantage; everyone else by sudden access to more import goods for the same outlay of money--a local increase in wealth).

      Instead, Greece falters; its currency (Euro) becomes no weaker than any other currency (Euro); exports don't increase because the neighboring countries's currencies (Euro) don't have a higher value than the Greek currency (Euro); the Greek currency (Euro) becomes weaker; neighboring currencies (Euro) also become weaker, thanks to Greece's shitty economy; neighboring countries must raise taxes and outlay expenses to bail out Greece, with associated strain on their economy and no return on their investment (wealth destruction); and everyone's economy stumbles and struggles to get back up.

    5. Re:Greeks surrender: no restructuring by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are some pretty serious questions about the honesty of Greek officials in reporting the implementation of previous reforms. This is one of the factors that has lead to the near total lack of trust in Tsipras and the Greek government.

      Debt relief does not appear to be permanently off the table, but Germany, along with some other EZ members (notably Finland) want to see verifiable evidence of significant reforms, and not just Greek negotiators saying one thing to EZ officials and then going home and saying and doing quite different things.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Greeks surrender: no restructuring by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What this all demonstrates is that the Eurozone needs to become a full fiscal union. What is happening in Greece, with the effective seizure, or at least oversight, of the Greek government's fiscal powers, is what needs to happen.

      Currencies like the US dollar work because, while there may be fifty states that use the USD, there is a single issuing central bank and a federal government that holds core constitutional fiscal powers. That's why you can have economies as diverse, small and large, as Rhode Island, Tennessee, California and New York in one federal state, because there is no "sharing" of fiscal sovereignty. The states are free to borrow money, but they have no control over central fiscal policy.

      In other words, as so many have been saying since Maastricht was signed, for the Euro to actually work, the Eurozone needs to effectively become a single state, and EZ members need to surrender their fiscal powers to a central fiscal authority.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re: Greeks surrender: no restructuring by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's Greece - they will get a new government instead and the agreements will be ignored. At worst it will be a hostile takeover. It wasn't long ago that Greece had a non-democratic government.

      It's probably easier and cheaper to abandon the Euro for Greece.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    8. Re:Greeks surrender: no restructuring by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What the EU wants instead is (1) the pipe dream of Greece paying back everything and (2) higher taxes and lower pensions now to help this repayment. In other words, for the EU the goal of any reforms is not to get Greece back on its feet but to extract money from it to pay back the loans.

      You're applying reasoning which works for a country with its own currency. If a country has its own floating currency, then raising taxes and lowering pensions is not necessary to reform the economy. You can just leave those as-is and the value of your currency will decline relative to everyone else's, effectively giving all your citizens a pay cut and thus helping to reduce your expenses (measured via other currencies than your own - that's what matters when you owe money to creditors outside your country). That's what happened to Germany in the 1930s, Mexico in the 1970s when they lifted price controls on the Peso.

      Greece is on the Euro though, so this is not an option. The fundamental problem is that Greek citizens are being paid too many Euros for the productivity they are generating (compared to other citizens in the Eurozone). Any long-term fix for this must involve increasing the Greek productivity-to-wages ratio to match the Eurozone norm. This is a mathematical fact - you cannot avoid it by holding an election or making political promises or complaining about fairness. Failure to correct this ratio means Greek debt will continue to increase regardless of whatever other measures you take. Even if you forgave all of Greece's debt, if you do not address this productivity-to-wages ratio imbalance between Greece and the other EU countries, Greece would just continue to accrue new debt.

      That means there are three options:

      (A) Boot Greece out of the Euro, forcing it to create and pay wages in its own currency. This currency can then decline in value vs the Euro until the average Greek's productivity-to-wages ratio (in Euros) matches citizens' in the Eurozone. However, neither the Eurozone nor Greece seems to want a Grexit, so you're left with the following two options:

      (B) Reduce average Greek wages. That's what higher taxes and lower pensions effectively do.

      (C) Increase avreage Greek productivity. That's what the privatization requirements and other reform measures in this package aim to do.

      At least one of those three things needs to happen. If none of them happen, Greece will simply continue amassing more debt no matter what else you do. Any proposal which does not include at least one of these things happening is simply not a solution.

      I should also add that it's disingenuous to claim Greece's problems stem from its creditors. When you borrow money, you are actually borrowing it from your future. Yes it is the creditors who gave you the money, but you pay it back to them in the future. The net effect is then that you are taking money from your future, and spending it today. The only thing the creditor gets out of it is some interest payments (which can be small or large depending on the lending terms). So aside from the interest the creditors earned, any suffering the Greeks experience today and until their debt is paid off, is the cost of them living it up during the 2000s. They did this to themselves.

      Debt forgiveness means the creditors (some banks and citizens in the other Eurozone countries) suffer for the Greeks having lived it up during the 2000s. Sometimes this is necessary if the interest on the debt is so onerous that the debt is growing faster than the country can pay it off. But it is not an action to be taken lightly, especially with Spain, Portugal, and Italy waiting in the wings hopeful that Greece will set a precedent which allows them to shed their debt without paying it back.

    9. Re:Greeks surrender: no restructuring by l2718 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with practically everything you say except the last bit.

      First, the Greek wages-to-productivity ratio must fall, by a combination of (1) Government-sector wage cuts (already started); (2) productivity increases in the government sector by (a) insisting that government workers actually do their job (b) firing redundant government workers and (c) privatization and (3) wage reduction and productivity increases in the private sector – made possible by freeing labour laws.

      However, raising taxes makes the wages-to-productivity ratio worse, because it increases the cost of hiring the worker without a corresponding cost to productivity, or equivalently increases deadweight losses. Instead, wage cuts in the private sector should be achieved by freeing the labour market (which is currently among the most restricted in Europe). In fact, workers need to be compensated for the wage cuts by tax cuts.

      As an aside, tax cuts would also increase compliance, which is the key problem with the Tax system (far more important than the rates).

      Regarding the source of problems, clearly they all stem from the behaviour of Greece (both the country and its people) and not of the creditors. Greece cooked its books before joining the Eurozone, and the Greek voters had ample opportunity to vote for free-market, better-government and smaller-government reforms in the years since.

      That said, the original creditors (eurozone banks) who lend to Greece until 2010 knew all this full well and decided to extend the credit anyway. The earned the interest rates they demanded, and should now have to eat the losses when, following the crisis and resulting economic contraction, Greece can't pay back. These banks may have had to suffer, but lending to sovereigns carries default risk (just like lending to private entities carries bankruptcy risk).

      What you are ignoring, however, is that the people of Europe were not creditors before their governments decided to take on the debt in 2010 (giving the banks a 50% haircut). Since the governments of Europe voluntarily decided to make public what previously was debt to private entities, they shouldn't now be able to turn around and claim that the taxpayers of Europe will suffer unfairly if the debt isn't paid. If the taxpayers were concerned about non-payments and didn't want to go into the debt vulture hedge-fund business they could have left the bad loans with the banks who made them originally.

      I personally thing that. beyond being against the EU treaties, the bailouts of Greece, Spain and Italy were also ill-conceived and morally wrong. But having gone into the sovereign loans business the EU can't complain about facing default risk.

  2. Sunk cost fallacy by amorsen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    European leaders keep pretending that they are giving Greece new money, when they are merely shuffling old debts around.

    The money that was loaned to Greece has been lost. The whole crisis is about everyone involved being unwilling to accept this reality and thinking that the money will somehow magically come back once the Greeks have been punished sufficiently.

    It is the same theory behind debtor's prison. It should be abolished for the same reasons.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    1. Re:Sunk cost fallacy by Carewolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even we forgave all of Greece's debts. They would still be in the negative. The reason they haven't gone bankrupt is because they CAN NOT AFFORD IT. They are that fucked up!!

      And no, to solve this they wouldn't need to starve. Greece as done all the stupid things to fix the budget, but the still haven't done a single thing that wouldn't have a negative effect on their economy or a positive one:
      1. They haven't raised pension age: Would be positive for the economy.
      2. They haven't address government corruption and tax dodging: Would be positive.
      3. They haven't sold off or reduced investment in their ridiculously oversize military which role is to fight a theoretical war with their 10x larger neighbour and fellow NATO ally Turkey. Would have no major net impact on the overall economy. (not that you can blame them for wanting such a military considering their history, but they can't afford it, and needs forget the past).

      Instead they have:
      1. Reduced benifits: Has a stong negative effect on the economy.
      2. Introduced silly ineffective laws. Has negative effect on the economy.
      3. Blamed the reduction and silly laws on everybody else. Has a net negative effect.
      4. Loaned money to pay interest even at 10+% interest. Has STONG negative effects on economy.

    2. Re:Sunk cost fallacy by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 4, Informative

      Totally agree. However, back in the day when Greece was allowed in the EURO (not EU), their obvious unsuitability was waived by France and Germany (under loud protest from the Netherlands and the Finns). It's appalling to see the German politicians ride the moral high-ground after:

      1. Allowing the Greeks in the euro in 2001 in the first place when it was obviously a bad fit (same holds for Italy)
      2. Breaking the stability pact in 2003 when it was convenient for them, opening the floodgates
      3. Profiting immensely from the increased export that was fueled by ill-advised loans to a corrupt elite in the Southern nations
      4. Bailing out the banks wrt Greece and offloading the Greek debt on the European population at large
      5. Pointing the German anger at a foreign nation to hide their shenanigans

      From my point of view it's a very sinister game that's being played here and the European project has failed. The Germans in particular seem to be incapable of taking responsibility for their actions and have stooped to a very dangerous form of demagogy. Let's stop this farce.

  3. Very important link left out: the agreement text by vivaoporto · · Score: 5, Informative

    A very important link was left out: the agreement text (PDF).

    Read it, it is only 7 pages long and, although it mentions other documents, the gist of it is there.

    Commenting on the agreement without reading it is engaging in mindless speculation colored by your own misconceptions and ideological leaning ...

    Oh, who am I kidding, this is slashdot, nobody RTFA.

  4. Re:Well so much for Democracy by galabar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the point is that they couldn't vote to have other countries give them money.

  5. Re:title is wrong by znrt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    banks were mostly saved in 2010 already. the debt is since then public and will be repayed with european tax money, one way or the other.

    plus a bit of greek blood, i guess, since they have no money left. this show right now isn't about banks anymore, it's just political. it's about destroying syriza, sending a strong message throughout europe and, well, try to make this failed system last a little longer. doesn't look good.

  6. Re:Very important link left out: the agreement tex by vivaoporto · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here it is, conveniently HTML formatted for your enjoyment. No emphasis added

    The Euro Summit stresses the crucial need to rebuild trust with the Greek authorities as a pre-requisite for a possible future agreement on a new ESM programme. In this context, the ownership by the Greek authorities is key, and successful implementation should follow policy commitments.

    A euro area Member State requesting financial assistance from the ESM is expected to address, wherever possible, a similar request to the IMF1. This is a precondition for the Eurogroup to agree on a new ESM programme. Therefore Greece will request continued IMF support (monitoring and financing) from March 2016.

    Given the need to rebuild trust with Greece, the Euro Summit welcomes the commitments of the Greek authorities to legislate without delay a first set of measures. These measures, taken in full prior agreement with the Institutions, will include:

    by 15 July
    - the streamlining of the VAT system and the broadening of the tax base to increase revenue;
    - upfront measures to improve long-term sustainability of the pension system as part of a comprehensive pension reform programme;
    - the safeguarding of the full legal independence of ELSTAT;
    - full implementation of the relevant provisions of the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union, in particular by making the Fiscal Council operational before finalizing the MoU and introducing quasi-automatic spending cuts in case of deviations from ambitious primary surplus targets after seeking advice from the Fiscal Council and subject to prior approval of the Institutions;

    by 22 July
    - the adoption of the Code of Civil Procedure, which is a major overhaul of procedures and arrangements for the civil justice system and can significantly accelerate the judicial process and reduce costs;
    - the transposition of the BRRD with support from the European Commission.

    Immediately, and only subsequent to legal implementation of the first four above-mentioned measures as well as endorsement of all the commitments included in this document by the Greek Parliament, verified by the Institutions and the Eurogroup, may a decision to mandate the Institutions to negotiate a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) be taken. This decision would be taken subject to national procedures having been completed and if the preconditions of Article 13 of the ESM Treaty are met on the basis of the assessment referred to in Article 13.1.

    In order to form the basis for a successful conclusion of the MoU, the Greek offer of reform measures needs to be seriously strengthened to take into account the strongly deteriorated economic and fiscal position of the country during the last year. The Greek government needs to formally commit to strengthening their proposals in a number of areas identified by the Institutions, with a satisfactory clear timetable for legislation and implementation, including structural benchmarks, milestones and quantitative benchmarks, to have clarity on the direction of policies over the medium-run. They notably need, in agreement with the Institutions, to:

    - carry out ambitious pension reforms and specify policies to fully compensate for the fiscal impact of the Constitutional Court ruling on the 2012 pension reform and to implement the zero deficit clause or mutually agreeable alternative measures by October 2015;
    - adopt more ambitious product market reforms with a clear timetable for implementation of all OECD toolkit I recommendations, including Sunday trade, sales periods, pharmacy ownership, milk and bakeries, except over-the-counter pharmaceutical products, which will be implemented in a next step, as well as for the opening of macro-critical closed professions (e.g. ferry transportation). On the follow-up of the OECD toolkit-II, manufacturing needs to be included in the prior action;
    - on energy markets, proceed with the privatisation of the electricity transmission netw

  7. Re:Well so much for Democracy by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Silly Greeks you thought your vote mattered.

    What? They got exactly what they voted for. The EU offered them a deal, and said that if they didn't take it, the eventual deal they would have to take would be a worse one. And they voted not to take the deal. They got exactly what they voted for, as promised: they still had to take a deal of some sort, and now they've got a worse one, just like they asked for.

    And as if that weren't enough evidence that Democracy works in Greece, keep in mind that they are in the position they're in because the position they're in is exactly the one they've been voting for all these years to obtain: they wanted more stuff than they could be bothered to pay for, and wanted to continue to elect socialist politicians who would promise them it would all be OK, and they'd always be able to get other Europeans to go to work each day in order to buy them the lifestyle they wanted. Democracy in Greece has worked perfectly. The problem is that the voters in Greece are fools.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  8. Charles Dickens said it best by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen [pounds] nineteen [shillings] and six [pence], result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery."
    -- Charles Dickens, David Copperfield

    Seriously, people, don't borrow money from scary international lenders who are just waiting for you to default so they can take control of your country. Don't borrow money from them! And if you do: pay it back! I can't stress that last point enough. It's really the key to the whole Greece problem.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  9. Most Important by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First things first: We have to make sure that no banker ever loses so much as a Euro, no matter how bad the investment. That's primary in this deal.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. Re:My solution by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're joking, but the Greeks have to give away a ton of assets for this deal. It's hard to see where they're going to get the sums necessary without looking at the antiquities.

    This is clearly a bad deal and frankly it seems like most of the people at the table know it is a joke. Did you see the deadlines in the article? They're giving themselves basically until the end of the week to completely turn their economy around, for the mere promise that the rest of the EU will consider extending the repayment period of the debts. They aren't even considering debt forgiveness.

    IMHO, the correct solution for Greece, painful as it would definitely be, is an exit from the Eurozone and a return to a national currency. The Eurozone has fundamental structural problems that are going to put Greece back in the hotseat in a few years even with this deal. Combined monetary policy with independent fiscal policy is not a sustainable model. It's like giving your irresponsible uncle your credit card on his promise that he will pay you back for everything he charges, even though he has defaulted on every loan he has ever had and is currently tens of thousands of euros in the hole and doesn't have a job.

    It also doesn't allow your currency to fluctuate with your economy, which puts a stranglehold on your economy when you have a recession.

    Sadly, a unified fiscal policy is politically impossible in the current EU. It would give up way too much sovereignty and be political suicide in most countries. You're talking about the EU itself collecting taxes and spending them on infrastructure. Foreign governments gaining oversight over national governments, an especially worrisome situation when the national government is breathtakingly corrupt. There is no chance you would get even a simple majority of countries to agree, much less the supermajority that would no doubt be required.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  11. Not a Greek bailout by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It is not a Greek bailout. It is a bailout of German and French banks, that lent irresponsibly to Greece. They did not do due diligence, and they knew Greece would not be able to repay. They knew the banks will be bailed out. The banks have become too big to fail, their top honchos too big to jail. The incentives are for irresponsible reckless risky practices.

    True, Greece borrowed irresponsibly and spent it in wasteful ways. But the banks can not shirk their responsibility.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  12. Re:Very important link left out: the agreement tex by vivaoporto · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, why not. Play by play below, italicizes are my asides. Sorry but no TL;DR of the TL;DR, it was hard enough to summarize the whole thing.

    1st paragraph: asks Greece to keep their promise this time.
    To be read with German accent as it was most likely added by Germany. It echoes the statement by Merkel this weekend that says "The most important currency has been lost and that is trust".

    2nd paragraph: tell Greece it is either both ESF and IMF or nothing.
    Meaning Greece will most likely have to agree to another set of measures imposed by IMF.

    3rd paragraph, pages 2 and 3, first item on page 4: sets the first measures to be taken and its deadlines.
    Some must be voted into law by 15 July (72 hours after the meeting) and some by 22 July, next week. They are more or less the same measures that triggered the referendum last week but with a notable absence: cuts in the military

    pages 4 and 5, aditional measures:
    - model for privatization.
    Instead of going to the public coffers it will go to a fund (managed by Greece, supervised by Europe). The assets (estimated 50B) will be split: 50/25/25. 50% to recapitalize the banks, 25B to repay loans, 25B for investiments.
    - model for the supervision: all draft legislation will be subject of their (EU and IMF) consult and agreement. Greece has until 20 July to ask to be helped.
    - reversal of anti austerity legislation: all of them, except the humanitarian crisis bill, must be reexamined and either reversed or replaced by an equivalent measure.
    SOP for "troika" (as in group of three, EU, ECB and IMF) technicians to become the fourth power in the country during the program duration. Happened in Portugal and Ireland

    end of page 5: states that Greece will need between 82 and 86B, unless it can collect more taxes or privatize better. 7 of those billion euros are needed before 20 July and 5 more before mid August. Also states that greece needs to "clear its arrears" to IMF and Bank of Greece
    Sibling post has it right, this part is "Greece, pay denbts"

    page 6: states that Greece either accepts the deal or banks won't reopen. Also, that it is syriza's )and whoever was its predecessor) fault by easing the policies during the last 12 months and that Eurozone can reconsider "longer grace and payment periods" but that will be "no haircuts"
    Again, "Greece, stop screwing up, pay denbts, all of it"

    page 7: states that if Greece accepts the deal the deal will go forward. Also, that in the next 3-5 years 35B will be mobilized to fund investment and economic activity (including SME) via EU programmes
    This must be the concession Tsipras is talking about, 35B for investment including small and medium-sized entrerprises not counting towards the loan but via EU investment.

  13. Re:Privatize the profits, socialize the loses... by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Informative

    The only way for Greece to recover is to leave the monetary union. They can remain a member of the EU without using the euro as their currency, the UK is an example of that; but every story you read in the mainstream media implies otherwise, which simply isn't true.

    It isn't just the UK; only 19 of the 28 member states of the EU use the Euro currency. Ones that don't include Denmark, Czech Republic, Romania, and Sweden. According to Wikipedia, however, it does seem that most of these are obliged to switch to the Euro when certain conditions are met; the only countries which have specifically opted out are UK and Denmark. But I do think it's interesting that very few eastern European EU nations have adopted the Euro so far (and instead, a couple of non-EU eastern European nations like Montenegro have unilaterally adopted it). If you look at the map, Greece kinda stands alone as a Euro user in that region, with only Cyprus (EU), Montenegro (non-EU) and Kosovo (non-EU) also using it.

  14. Credibility is key by l2718 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Indeed, whether Syriza would implement the reforms is the most important question. Varoufakis was very vocal about the need for the reforms, but he has been forced out (by the EU !). The left-left wing of Syriza is opposed. It's not clear what the majority would do, and like you I would have preferred to see some reforms passed in February and March while the negotiations were ongoing.

    However, some of the reforms Germany is asking for (higher taxes, pension cuts) cause me to doubt their bona fides here. The main problem is taxes in Greece is non-payment and the informal economy. Raising taxes is likely to exacerbate this problem by increasing the motivation to evade the higher taxes. Lowering taxes and simplifying the tax system is far more likely to raise more revenue.

    Similarly, the main problem with government pensions is early retirement. The solution should therefore be to raise the retirement age for those currently working, which in the long term resolve the problems without creating short-term pain. The German solution (cut pensions now) means asking current pensioners who have no prospect of other sources of income and cannot choose to go back to the jobs they retired from to help repay the national debt.