Slashdot Mirror


America's Technical Debt

Funksaw writes: An article by Brian Boyko in Equal Citizens, Lawrence Lessig's blog dealing with issues of institutional corruption in democratic politics, explains why, specifically, this reform movement needs (more) people with technical minds and technical skills.

Quoting: "What we need are more people willing to look at the laws of this country based on their function. And when I use the word 'function,' I mean very specifically the same sense that a computer programmer means it. (Because lord knows, government isn't functioning by any other definition.) ... It's not just that big money politics is being injected [like a code injection] into the function of democracy. It's also that the function of democracy can be warped by an injection. Stopping the injection of money into our democratic function still leaves the function vulnerable to the same — or similar — injection attack.... We need people who can solve the problems of politics like a programmer solves problems in computer code, because a democratic system with vulnerabilities is a democratic system that can fail or be made to fail."

The author is the technical adviser to the New Hampshire Rebellion and Mayday.US, two of Lessig's major reform projects.

3 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Re: Holy shit, this is some wank. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So we need a programmer for laws. I shall call this profession .... Lawyer.

  2. Wrong problem by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not the laws per se (though some, like the ACA, are atrocious at many levels). It's the low-information voters. There are plenty of cases where motivated voters who actually pay attention will vote contrary to what the money spent on the campaign would (if Lessig were right) say that they'd vote. The problem is that most of the time, voters are two dumb to actually understand the issues at stake or the consequences of their actions. Fix the dumbness, and you fix all sorts of other cultural mal-consequences (not just clumsy politics and gimme-dat laws).

    Not saying that producing informed, critical-thinking-capable young people is easy, just that the payoff for doing so is huge, and not just in the area being discussed.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Wrong problem by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Granted some part of me does wonder if maybe with computer based voting if it'd be possible to actually do a pure democracy and everybody vote on every law.

      Disaster.

      Democratic republics were originally simply because it was unfeasible to have a paper election so frequently

      We are structured the way we are specifically to avoid the tyranny of the democratic majority.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.