Slashdot Mirror


Paralyzed Man Hits the Streets of NYC In a New Exoskeleton

the_newsbeagle writes: Robert Woo was paralyzed in 2007 when a construction crane dropped a load of steel on him. Yesterday, he put on the newest "exoskeleton," essentially a pair of smart robotic legs, and strolled out into a busy Manhattan sidewalk. He was demoing the ReWalk 6.0, a $77,000 device that he plans to buy for home use.

9 of 38 comments (clear)

  1. $1000 DIY version in 10, 9, ... by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The motors, sensors, software and batteries of this product are no doubt top end. They also must bear the weight of a regulatory approval process that makes people safe. That means a fall chance of zero because falls can cause significant damage. If you see a thousand dollar version understand the difference - commercial motors, slower response time, less redundancy, less battery life and occasional failures.

    1. Re:$1000 DIY version in 10, 9, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, the DIY version comes with only two anti-air missiles.

    2. Re:$1000 DIY version in 10, 9, ... by D.McG. · · Score: 2

      "Woo also counseled the company to focus on making it easy for a user to don the ReWalk. That could make the difference between a device that someone wants to use every day, he said, and one that ends up in a closet."

      No one is going to spend $70,000 on an exoskeleton and let it end up in a closet. For that kind of money, you'll find a way to put it on, or not buy it in the first place.

  2. It's no use prevaricating about the bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're techno trousers, ex-NASA, fantastic for walkies!

  3. Re:Size of computer by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps that is actually a battery pack? I'd imagine something like this would need a lot of power if you want to go very far with it (and not risk collapsing in the middle of the street somewhere)

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  4. Re:Not quite impressed with new product. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Call me back if you get paralysed from the waist down, and then tell me you're not impressed.

    What is it with some people? Does "not being impressed" make you feel better than everyone else because your standards are so much higher?

    I bet the fax machine is nothing but a waffle iron with a phone attached to you...

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  5. Re:Not quite impressed with new product. by KGIII · · Score: 2

    I clicked the link and looked at pictures but I promise - I did not read one single word of the article. I am no heretic. I hope it makes some serious noises going down the street. Anyhow, I want a pair of these and I am not even paralyzed. I would go stomping down the street making robot noises. I don't even do drugs (anymore) and I would still do it. Though I suppose I would prefer a pair that did not also require crutches.

    Those are the same style of crutches that I got after I had my knee surgery. They took a little bit to get used to but I found them much more usable than the traditional types after I acclimated. I wonder if they are required or if they are a safety measure because these may fail as they are prototypes.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  6. I'm only guessing but... by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    ... if you're paralysed and stuck in a wheelchair I'd imagine that even a walk just down to the bottom of the street and back would feel like a life changing experience.

    Its good to see some genuinely useful robotics applications coming out instead of trivial gimmicks such as japanese robotic hotel receptionists.

    1. Re:I'm only guessing but... by Viol8 · · Score: 2

      "Avoid ableism here"

      How about you avoid stupid "ism" terms that you've just made up.

      "He can go faster in a wheelchair, despite the stigma, than he can in the robotic legs."

      Even up and down stairs or getting on a bus/train/etc?