Slashdot Mirror


950 Million Android Phones Can Be Hijacked By Malicious Text Messages

techtech writes: According to security firm Zimperium a flaw called "Stagefright" in Google's Android operating system can allow hackers take over a phone with a message even if the user doesn't open it. The vulnerability affects about 950 million Android devices. In a blog post Zimperium researchers wrote: "A fully weaponized successful attack could even delete the message before you see it. You will only see the notification. These vulnerabilities are extremely dangerous because they do not require that the victim take any action to be exploited. Unlike spear-phishing, where the victim needs to open a PDF file or a link sent by the attacker, this vulnerability can be triggered while you sleep. Before you wake up, the attacker will remove any signs of the device being compromised and you will continue your day as usual—with a trojaned phone."

120 comments

  1. idiots by bws111 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey morons, you already posted this TODAY.

    1. Re:idiots by edtice1559 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Probably a proof-of-concept exploit that causes the editors to post dupes when they receive the payload!

    2. Re:idiots by msauve · · Score: 2

      The first article isn't even gone from the front page yet. /. "editors" strike again.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re: idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That iPhone venerability has already been patched.

    4. Re: idiots by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 2

      I actually like my Lumia 520. Not because it's safer but because it's not android or ios. I don't care about apps because I really don't use them. I just care that it makes phone calls without dropping and text messages work. Bonus is it is running Windows 10 pretty well for such a cheap phone. All wins to me.

    5. Re:idiots by painandgreed · · Score: 3, Funny

      The first article isn't even gone from the front page yet. /. "editors" strike again.

      I saw another dupe over the weekend. Maybe they're trying to appease all the old readers by making it seem more like pre-DIce Slashdot.

    6. Re: idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry that small feature is coming back in iOS 9.

    7. Re: idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which will brick anything older that iPhone 7. Yay!

    8. Re: idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes I think about buying a Windows Phone POS bu then sanity overcomes me and decide against it.

    9. Re: idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. I love my Blu Win HD LTE because it works like a device, just like mobile phones used to. It doesn't lag or stutter like Android, the UI is miles better than anything else out there and it interoperates with my PC flawlessly. Having better security than Android and iOS is just a bonus.

      I can't wait until the x86 based Windows phones arrive. It would be awesome to be able to run the same software that my desktop and laptop run, but it would also instantly make Windows phone have the largest library of software out of all of the mobile phone platforms.

    10. Re: idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as a jailbreak tweak for those who say "fuck the walled garden" but still enjoy the speed and style of iOS devices.

    11. Re: idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have yet to meet an iOS user that has patched it. As we all know, iDevice users aren't too concerned about updating their devices.

    12. Re: idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After 1 week 41% of users were on 8.4. Nice confirmation bias though.

    13. Re: idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay you've got a point about it being cool to have x86 phones, but the rest of what you said is nonsense friend. A Windows phone just doesn't give a good enough reward to exploit or find exploits for, it's not that there aren't vulnerabilities. I've yet to see lag or stutter on an Android device, though I suspect that has to do more with buying crap phones than the OS and the UI looks like the garbage 8 interface. As far as interoperability, well I don't know what problems you've had with either iOS or Android, but I haven't seen a problem with Android on any OS and iOS works fine with Windows and Mac, while linux compatibility is a little flaky. I say this as a user of Mac at work, Windows and Linux at home and owner of multiple Android and iOS devices. I don't see any reason to like the Windows phone and apparently most others agree.

    14. Re: idiots by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Oh, just wait until the x86 Windows phones come out, though. It'll be just as attractive as the Windows desktop, because it will be the exact same software. For anyone already writing a Windows exploit, the effort required to exploit an x86 Windows phone will be 0.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    15. Re: idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the rest of what you said is nonsense friend

      Nah, it's the truth.

      I've yet to see lag or stutter on an Android device

      I've seen dozens of Android devices and they all have lag and stutter. Changing screens or pulling up a menu should be instantaneous at all times. Also scrolling should never jerk or tear. These things never happen on Windows phones but they happen all of the time on Android, even with the latest version and high end mobile hardware.

      UI looks like the garbage 8 interface

      The Windows 8 interface is only bad on desktop PCs. On a tablet or a phone, it's brilliant. Much better than that tired old Android/iPhone WIMP interface garbage that was shoehorned into a mobile touch device, despite not being well suited for it.

      As far as interoperability, well I don't know what problems you've had with either iOS or Android, but I haven't seen a problem with Android on any OS and iOS works fine with Windows and Mac

      Windows phone support goes well beyond Android or iOS when connected to a Windows PC. Android only lets you copy files. iOS only lets you copy files and only through iTunes. With Windows phones, I can drag and drop select applications running on my desktop and it pops up on my phone seamlessly so I can continue working without being at my desk. You can't do that with Android or iOS.

      I don't see any reason to like the Windows phone and apparently most others agree

      So you get your group validation, good for you. Unlike you, I am capable of forming my own thoughts and opinions, regardless of how anyone else feels.

      Seriously though, have you even used a Windows phone? Because it sounds like you haven't.

    16. Re: idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For anyone already writing a Windows exploit, the effort required to exploit an x86 Windows phone will be 0.

      So still more difficult than owning an Android phone by sending a text to it. It's a shame that most Android owners will never even receive a fix for that gaping hole in their OS either so it can be exploited over and over again forever, lol.

    17. Re: idiots by dave.haku · · Score: 1

      A Windows phone just doesn't give a good enough reward to exploit or find exploits for, it's not that there aren't vulnerabilities.

      It is nice to see we've come full circle. That has been the Microsoft defense for years for Windows and everybody is quick to downplay it.

      I've yet to see lag or stutter on an Android device, though I suspect that has to do more with buying crap phones than the OS

      My HTC One M8 lags and stutters and I have to reboot it. Granted, not all the time, but it certainly does. You might want proof, but I'm too lazy for that, so you'll have to take it from me or ignore it. Plus, Windows pones are rumored to perform well even on low end HW, but hey, that's only what I've heard.

      ...and the UI looks like the garbage 8 interface.

      Personal opinion. So, I really like the interface on both Windows 8.1 PRO and Windows 8.1 Phone, so there, that should balance it.

    18. Re: idiots by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Doing *nothing* is more difficult than sending a specially crafted MMS message? I suppose I can see that with the younger generations, as doing nothing would require them to put their damn phones down. You're also missing the point that the entire catalog of already existing x86 Windows malware will be available on an x86 Windows phone. Anything capable of attacking a current version of Windows on an x86-based PC will be able to attack Windows on an x86-base phone. That's millions of pieces of malware right there.

      And let's not ignore the fact that the sheer number of Android devices that are and will remain vulnerable to this exploit falls squarely on the shoulders of the device manufacturers who don't release updates and the carriers who don't distribute them once released. This is not an issue on Nexus devices, nor is it an issue on "Google Edition" devices, for both classes of which Google directly releases updates. My Nexus 6 was patched against this weeks ago; the lack of updates is not an Android problem, it is a manufacturer and carrier problem, easily worked around by selecting a device for which Google does directly supply updates, and getting the better, faster, and cleaner "vanilla" Android experience as an added benefit.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  2. Wow so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this article is really just a disguised advertisement for Firefox?

    My carrier already intercepts all my media messages and forces me to open them via a link anyway.

  3. ..all versions of Android after and including 2.2 by OutOnARock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    95% of them will never be patched........thanks for all the fragmentation.....

  4. I'm okay... by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    No Android.
    No smartphone.
    No cellphone.
    My telephone's an old fashion really dumb land line. One thing you gotta love about being behind the times is not getting hacked.

    1. Re:I'm okay... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      If you never use any computer you're even safer. I suggest you throw out the one you typed this on.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:I'm okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be awfully fun at all the parties you never get invited to.

    3. Re:I'm okay... by Scot+Seese · · Score: 1

      Pfft. I'm outside your house clipping my orange lineman's handset into your Bell box, so I can listen to all your calls.

      Wait until I tell the guys at 2600 Magazine about this! er33t h4x!

      --
      THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
    4. Re:I'm okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's best to avoid words and pictures of any sort, really. I even advise leaving ones eyes closed and ideally disentangling one's consciousness from all external perceptions. Otherwise you're basically f'ed.

    5. Re:I'm okay... by msauve · · Score: 2

      "If you never use any computer you're even safer. I suggest you throw out the one you typed this on."

      I'd think his public library would be upset by that.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    6. Re:I'm okay... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      You must be awfully fun at all the parties you never get invited to.

      They're horrible at parties. Always bugging people who are on their phones with trying to talk face to face and stuff.

    7. Re:I'm okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's best to avoid words and pictures of any sort, really. I even advise leaving ones eyes closed and ideally disentangling one's consciousness from all external perceptions. Otherwise you're basically f'ed.

      Essentially, Buddhism?

    8. Re:I'm okay... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      My telephone's an old fashion really dumb land line...

      Oh I know, right? I keep a couple tin cans and some string around in case things get really bad.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    9. Re:I'm okay... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      One nice thing about using candles is not having to worry about power failures.

      (I don't get this attitude; depriving yourself of cool things so you don't have to deal with the inconvenience of those things breaking?)

    10. Re:I'm okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god, never on purpose.

    11. Re: I'm okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah until the IRS or OPM or an institution you use or have no choice of using gets hacked and you have your identity stolen.

    12. Re:I'm okay... by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      No, this article was specific to the Android. Try to stay on topic no matter how your mind wanders...

    13. Re:I'm okay... by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      Ah, but there's the rub. You think the Android phone a cool new thing. What Smartphones really are is gussied up old tech (voice) with a new suit that makes them more vulnerable. I very rarely use voice phone. I use email which is far faster and more efficient. I also don't communicate things via email that are worth "listening" into so the fact that email is a postcard is not an issue either. In either case, you can't hack my email the way the Android phone hack is being done - that was the point of the original poster's article.

      Email simply more efficient than voice no matter how fancy your phone. Catch up with the times and ditch your phone.

    14. Re:I'm okay... by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      Have fun. I hope you don't get too bored since I almost never use the phone and I never say anything on it that matters... Virtually all of my communications are via email - which is an open postcard so nothing interesting there either - and email is not hackable. It is the Android system that is the subject of the hacking in the original poster's article or perhaps you didn't read that. That's why candles, tin cans, old dial up phones have an advantage - they're simply not remotely hackable. So hook into the line and listen to your hearts content while you continue to miss the point. :)

  5. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://it.slashdot.org/story/15/07/27/1416257/stagefright-flaw-compromise-android-with-just-a-text

    1. Re:Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, feels like the good old days. Let's hope for the return of high level technical comments and 'stuff that matters' too ... nah just kidding.

  6. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can blame the carriers for much of that fragmentation.

  7. "A fully weaponized successful attack could even delete the message before you see it."

    A fully weaponized attack could take screenshots and camera pictures of you tossing off at Wikiarmpits.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  8. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by ne0n · · Score: 1, Informative

    CM and nearly all custom roms are immune and Lollipop is completely unaffected. Next time don't buy a carrier device.

    --
    $ :(){ :|:& };:
  9. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

    95% of them will never be patched........thanks for all the fragmentation.....

    EXCEPT 5.0 Lollipop, because Lollipop uses a different media framework. Which I'm sure has its own issues, but thankfully, even a year after release, its marketshare is tiny enough that it doesn't matter.

    Even worse, it's a bug inside the OS itself, so it's not like Google can actually fix the problem like they have using Google Services Framework.

    It can only be fixed by a rooted device or a software update to replace the broken library.

  10. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can blame the carriers for much of that fragmentation.

    Finger pointing.

    The time-worn bullshit excuse that obviously never gets old.

    If at first you don't succeed, fucking blame someone else.

  11. Old tech is good tech by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 1

    And this is why I use a $9 phone that has support for nothing other than voice calls and plaintext SMS. Not only is it free from the effects of such exploits but the battery also lasts two weeks between charges, it fits very nicely in even the smallest pocket and doesn't distract me when I should be working or spending time with friends and family.

    I only upgraded to this phone because I found the cranking handle on the side of my old phone was snagging on my pocket and the operator was sometimes very slow to respond with "number please" when I tried to summon her attention :-)

    1. Re:Old tech is good tech by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      Surely the trailing wire back to the exchange was a bigger problem?

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    2. Re:Old tech is good tech by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      But does it work on verizon? Most of the cheap basic phones ive seen are gsm only.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    3. Re:Old tech is good tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had one of those old Nokia 1100 phones. It stopped working and I was given a free Galaxy S3. Go figure.

    4. Re:Old tech is good tech by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Would you want it to work on Verizon? I mean, they're advertiser-friendly unique-id headers alone should make you swear them off.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re: Old tech is good tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might RTFA, but you should read the fucking comments you reply to.

      I don't think advertising headers are a concern for the $9 phone.

    6. Re:Old tech is good tech by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      First they do actually let you turn of the uuid thing now.
      I turned it off same day they added the option to do so.
      Still annoyed about that but aside from switching to a less reliable provider not a lot else I can do.

      Second I don't actually do a lot of browsing on my Samsung convoy 3 the ssl warning in combination with the small screen makes it a serious pita just to look up the weather.

      Third att/sprint/tmobile all have pretty crappy service by me although att has gotten much better in my area in the last couple of years.

      Fourth I suppose I could switch to att as they are pretty close in coverage but those Indian call centers are killer and I have to be checked in before I can look around the effing store wtf??

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    7. Re:Old tech is good tech by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      And this is why I use a $9 phone that has support for nothing other than voice calls and plaintext SMS. Not only is it free from the effects of such exploits but the battery also lasts two weeks between charges, it fits very nicely in even the smallest pocket and doesn't distract me when I should be working or spending time with friends and family.

      You insensitive fucking clod, my wife read that, got all excited, and left me. Said something about wanting to have your babies. You must get that a lot though.

      Slashdot kooks are getting like that crazy uncle who brags about not having email. Or a computer.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Old tech is good tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - This email was sent via an Abacus

  12. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Responsibility is irrelevant. Fragmentation is simply a fact of the Android ecosystem.

  13. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with blaming the people responsible for the issue?

  14. MMS vector by xarragon · · Score: 5, Informative

    TFA (requires obnoxious CAPTCHA just to read, wtf) makes it clear the payload is inside a media file attached to an MMS. Myself I do not use MMS since it seems to require OTA data to download the MMS payload, which is exceedingly expensive on my current prepaid plan. Old phones are pretty likely to be used like this; voice only, data only over wifi, so it might lessen the impact. Anyways, I am on Lollipop.

    1. Re:MMS vector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking hell dude, just get T-Mobile and never worry about data again. They may not be perfect but at least they got the data part right (as long as you're not roaming; *smirk*).

    2. Re:MMS vector by anarkhos · · Score: 1

      Better yet, with t-mobile you'll never get any messages anyway because they have no network t speak of

      --
      >80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
      >life
    3. Re:MMS vector by nazsco · · Score: 1

      tmo doesn't have a unlimited plan, if that's what you're implying. I'm on the most expensive tier and it's 5gb.

    4. Re:MMS vector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do you prevent your phone from automatically downloading the MMS's when you go online?

    5. Re:MMS vector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "unlimited" with throttling. My point is you don't have to worry about paying extra no matter how much you use.

    6. Re:MMS vector by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Uhm... yes, they do. Simple Choice is $50, which has unlimited everything except LTE data (if which you get 1GB; data itself is technically unlimited at 2G speeds, though. For $60, you can get the same but with 3GB, for $70 you can get the same but with 5GB (which appears to be what you have) and, for $80, you can get the same with unlimited LTE, which is what I have had since the day they launched Simple Choice and I switched from AT&T. I just checked their website to get the current numbers for the lower plans, as the $50 level included only 250MB when I first signed up and has been doubled twice since then, so this is their current offering.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    7. Re:MMS vector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, hello there, Tor user! ;)

  15. What kind of idiot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of idiot or idiots create a flaw this dreadful? It sounds suspiciously like it was deliberately created.

  16. BlackBerry remembers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully, people will remember this when BlackBerry comes out with their Android flavour, someday. Think security from the start to the end.

  17. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

    No, you can blame Google.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  18. Why don't vendors and carriers get sued/fined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I buy a new phone, it generally involves a two year contract. Even without a contract, it's reasonable to expect that a new phone will be supported for a couple of years. For phones where the carrier controls the software, like Android, that seems to be an implicit part of the service that the carrier is contracted to provide. I don't agree with lawsuits for buggy code, provided that there isn't negligence involved. However, when the vendor and carrier are aware of a problem and fail to provide a solution in a timely manner, why aren't they held legally responsible? I recognize that this doesn't put lives at risk, but is the inaction of vendors and carriers fundamentally different than, say, the negligence of Fiat Chrysler that they just got fined for? When will there be class action suits against manufacturers and vendors who delay pushing out security updates for relatively new phones?

    1. Re:Why don't vendors and carriers get sued/fined? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I recognize that this doesn't put lives at risk

      System-corrupting malware installed onto an on-call doctor's phone via this exploit, causing a boot-loop so no calls or messages can get through.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  19. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    If it can be exploited remotely for root access then it can be patched remotely by a non-vendor. I guess we will see stagefright patch apps start appearing over the next few days.

    Obviously, nobody can rely on the lame-ass vendors, even if they had their heart in it.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  20. Re:..all versions of Android after and .apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apk HOSTS editor for Android enables it to maintain name resolutions in memory with no DNS. Can render attacks unsuccessful.

    * Reducing network traffic and LESS TRAFFIC means safer Androids

    P.S.=> I'm out of toilet paper

  21. Re:idiots (OH NOES THE BOOGIE MAN GONNA GET YOU) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hey morons, you already posted this TODAY.

    Piece of shit Windows 10 comes out in a couple days. Some obscure-wtf-bullshit site zimperium(?!) posts on their own blog. So now it's the end of the world. All Androids are fucking rooted while you slept last night. Aw shit. Damn. This is supposedly because of vulnerable MMS video lag prevention features in "stagefright libraries".

    FUD. 2x dupe on Slashdot raises the credibility eyebrow. c|net has had zero credibility with me for many years.

    http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/android-stagefright-mms-hack-news/
    "The good news is that hackers weren’t aware of the vulnerability, so it’s unlikely anyone is utilizing it at the moment. However, disclosures of the bugs will be released today, which means that exploiters will have enough information to start writing code."

    In other words, if there even is a vulnerability capable of exploiting Android MMS with a text message, nobody has done it except allegedly whoever the hell zimperium "security researchers" are.

    Now that it's in full blast FUD mode, Google and everybody else for sure sees it. As retarded as that would be to have mysterious hackers "send a txt message and pwn your phone" from the shadows of the underworld... I foresee zero chance of it happening. 0.00% chance but I see websites calling it "THE MOTHER OF ALL EXPLOITS". Nah homies. Fuck you.

    I see here... http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/help/android-mms-stagefright-exploit-t3166457

    One poster in the xda dev forum thread above says patches were sent by Google weeks ago. The poster links to a Forbes article. Another commenter shows how to disable the player by editing your build.prop

    Nothing to see here folks. Not shit to do. Wait a day or two until stories say Welp, that was a big nothing.

    Install Linux before Windows 10 comes out is my advice. distrowatch.com

    tl;dr "oh shit Android needs a patch before somebody besides zimperium researchers (?!) figure out how to exploit the #1 mobile OS in the world!!11"

    And this little bit of code supposedly does what? Does it auto-start a program on your phone already that connects to some IP address in Romania and begin to upload all your photos? Does it overclock your chips like STUXNET and your phone spins out of control in your pocket, melting your legs? We are supposed to be in suspense to find out what "they" do. LOL This shit is stupid. Double posting it? Ya, long memory here.

  22. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's the phone makers' faults. Sorry, but that's just the way it is.

    Apple has shown that it's possible for the device manufacturer to deploy new software directly. Yet in the Android world, it's still the carriers doing it. There's only a few phones where the manufacturer pushes new updates (and even those don't tend to be supported as long as iPhones do)

    The Android world needs to wake the hell up and start supporting its users properly. It's ridiculous that this sort of situation can happen; if a similar exploit appeared for iOS, Apple would patch devices in 10 seconds flat.

  23. Question with data mode on/off by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    If the data plan is turned off, you can't get any multimedia. It isn't an optimal solution, but turning data off will protect you, right?

    1. Re:Question with data mode on/off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bahah, hope this is a serious post.

    2. Re:Question with data mode on/off by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

      Which is the funny part, that I don't use a data plan or that I think it will protect against MMS? I don't even get images sent via texts, so I was wondering if I don't download any data if the payload can still hit.

    3. Re:Question with data mode on/off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you do any of the following:
        - Visit websites that play video
        - Use apps that have video ads
        - Receive video via MMS

      If you answered yes to any of the above, you are vulnerable.

  24. Carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The quickest blanket solution would be for the Carriers (Verizon, ATT etc.) to scan the MMS on their network and block ones that are malformed.

  25. Rooting is over-rated by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 5, Informative

    "It can only be fixed by a rooted device or a software update to replace the broken library."

    "Rooting" (or allowing runtime access to root-level functions) is unnecessary for fixing any Android OS-level problem. However an unlocked bootloader will allow you to install an unofficial update or patch (unfortunately also allowing you to install a malware). A "rooted" device is actually even more of a security risk, especially if you have to trust a closed-sourced "superuser" binary.

    Note that I distinguish between "rooted" Android systems that allow you to gain root level access on demand and those setups that allow for off-line root access via special recovery or debug modes that require a reboot and so is not available when running the system normally.

    1. Re:Rooting is over-rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except most of said affected devices have locked bootloaders that the device owner can't unlock or install their own key into. As such, "rooting" one of these devices may be the only way to fix them. (If at all.)

      I won't argue the need for a better method, or that Google should (have / be) demand (ed / ing) better support from manufacturers, that is true. Actually, we need better protections than what we have considering all of the data these things have access to and generate. Saying that the only method people do have is "over-rated" and "unnecessary" however, is inappropriate.

  26. They won't get to my phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pulled the battery a couple of weeks ago. Been training friends and familiy for a while not to contact me on my phone. I did this by turning off the ringer and being very slow to return calls. Eventually, I finally felt that I could turn it off except for the rare occasions where I need it anymore. It a very liberating thing to do. You should try it.

  27. You "biting off my style"? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    * :)

    (Still - your hearts in the right place, so... there ya are!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Man! Even to the point of using MY posting style here on /. too - "will wonders NEVER cease"... apk

    1. Re:You "biting off my style"? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have admirers, you know!

  28. The source is out there by samantha · · Score: 1

    Is the patch available?

    1. Re:The source is out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the fucking article, moron.

      patch IS available... upstream providers that clouded your phone with services you didn't want or ask for now have to merge in the patch, and they don't like merging in patches... to much work, so fuck you.

    2. Re:The source is out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the fucking article, moron.

      patch IS available... upstream providers that clouded your phone with services you didn't want or ask for now have to merge in the patch, and they don't like merging in patches... to much work, so fuck you.

      wow this is the most retarded troll post I've ever read.

  29. Editors don't read slashdot, maybe Google? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    If editors don't read Slashdot itself maybe they should Google their own website. I mean a simple search like: "Android Malicious Text url:slashdot.org" returns both articles.

    If editors google what they are about to post they can outsourse the job of reading the very site where they manage content.

  30. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    CM and nearly all custom roms are immune and Lollipop is completely unaffected. Next time don't buy a carrier device.

    Some of us don't have a choice, some of us still don't have a choice. Welcome to Canada.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  31. older devices don't get patched.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    for iphone 4 as well? I don't think soooo.

    anyhow... expect mobile networks to filter these messages in 1.2.3.4....

    either that or 400 million phones in use in asia will receive an attack today if the attack really works as described in the blurb (proof of concept that installs something or gtfo).

    (if you browse on a mobile from asia you might notice that shitloads of adverts that try to exploit or trick the user into installing sw. even slashdot carries occasionally ads targeted to asia tha will just straight up open another page that will try to fool the user into installing sw and doesn't let the user easily press back. thats without clicking the friggin advert. it's like ad networks do no curating whatsoever of asian targeted ads)

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  32. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    That is completely wrong. The blog post by the folks who discovered the vulnerability even includes screencaps of Lollipop 5.1.1 being taken over via MMS. Not sure where you got the idea that Lollipop and CM are unaffected.

  33. TURN OFF MMS by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    or never configure it in the first place to work.

    that's your fix.

    and slashdot editors: MMS IS NOT SMS SO FUCK YOU SLASHDOT EDITOR. it's not even remotely same technlogy.

    mms is vulnurable? duh. how about sharing the image preview vuln(presumably) that's actually used since that has much more to it than just mms. but that mms implementation is exploitable is quite a bit less fatal/interesting than sms vuln.

    besides than that I'm pretty fucking sure that 950 million android phones (total androids out there) don't have preview of mms in the notifications bar. only a subset has that feature. but the more interesting and potentially attackable route is through anything else that shows images.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  34. Re: ..all versions of Android after and including by oobayly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Coming from an android user, the gp is absolutely correct. Allowing carriers to decide whether updates are pushed out simply means that they never do so. It's the top item on the [fairly short] list of things that I wish would be copied from Apple.

  35. Use TextSecure / SMSSecure by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

    It'll give you a warning before stagefright is used

    https://github.com/WhisperSyst...
    you can find SMSSecure on f-droid

    Also check to make sure hangouts isn't using mms (just to be on the safe side)

  36. got the update this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I received a webview update this morning -- which claims to repair video crashes. So I guess
    that fixes are out. This in France, Motorola phone.

  37. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    95% of them will never be patched........thanks for all the fragmentation.....

    EXCEPT 5.0 Lollipop, because Lollipop uses a different media framework. Which I'm sure has its own issues, but thankfully, even a year after release, its marketshare is tiny enough that it doesn't matter.

    Even worse, it's a bug inside the OS itself, so it's not like Google can actually fix the problem like they have using Google Services Framework.

    It can only be fixed by a rooted device or a software update to replace the broken library.

    This is completely wrong: 5.0 and 5.1 all include stagefright library. Nuplayer has been around for awhile and is a counterpart to Stagefright. Android has been moving toward deprecating Stagefright and replacing it with Nuplayer. In 5.0 this started with the inclusion options to allow manufactures to use nuplayer or stagefright as the default. Since nuplayer is still considered experimental there are been compatibility issues so most manufacturers shipped their 5.0 and 5.1 builds with the default still set to stagefright. Most all lollipop phones are still using stagefright by default because that is what the manufacturers set in their builds.

    On most phones with 5.x you can go into developer settings on the phone and turn the nuplayer under audio settings on which in theory should mitigate the vulnerability. Since this vulnerability really is 5 or more CVE's its a combination of more than a few bugs which means using nuplayer may not fully mitigate the vulnerability.

  38. CyanogenMod by Zanadou · · Score: 4, Informative

    Concerning CyanogenMod, this was posted to their Facebook page a few hours ago:

    Recent Stagefright issues

    The following CVE's have been patched in CM12.0 and 12.1 nightlies for a couple weeks. If you haven't updated already, we strongly encourage you to do so.

    CM11 will see these updates hit as part of out of band fixes this weekend (these releases occur weekly).

    CVE-2015-1538
    CVE-2015-1539
    CVE-2015-3824
    CVE-2015-3826
    CVE-2015-3827
    CVE-2015-3828
    CVE-2015-3829

    We are actively following all the DefCon events and announcements and will be keeping tabs on other disclosures that could impact CM and its derivatives.

    ï

  39. Using a MMS by Nikademus · · Score: 1

    Seriously, do people really use MMS? Just disable MMS (if have enabled it) and you are safe as it seems.
    What is the purpose of MMS? Paying 100x more to send the same contents which could be sent using an email?

    --
    I gave up with the idea of an useful sig...
    1. Re:Using a MMS by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      Actually you could just disable auto-fetching of media within MMS to work around the problem.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    2. Re:Using a MMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MMS is just one attack vector, any form of media playing that uses stagefright can be used. A video on a website, an ad from a game. Anything.

    3. Re:Using a MMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, do people really use MMS? Just disable MMS (if have enabled it) and you are safe as it seems. What is the purpose of MMS? Paying 100x more to send the same contents which could be sent using an email?

      This may be a geographical thing: in the US, most users get MMS for "free" along with SMS and the technical distinction between the two is ignored. The UI for sending an MMS is indistinguishable from that of sending an SMS; because it costs the same as an SMS, the end user thinks of it as attaching a picture or video clip to a text message.

      (This geographical thing goes both ways; I was confused as to why Snapchat had a billion users and huge traction outside the US. Why not just send a text? :)

    4. Re:Using a MMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't an MMS issue. Stagefright also handles video content running in Chrome/Chrome WebView. In fact, Firefox also uses Stagefright, so they had to release an emergency patch as well.

  40. Why is the platform not OTA-upgradeable? by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    The set of hardware capabilities available on a smartphone has more or less stabilized on phones these days. Which means that the kernel API to the hardware could be frozen. Which means that everything above the kernel level could be OTA-upgraded (to stock, at least -- carrier customizations should be installed as an app and/or theme on top of the stock firmware anyway). Why in 2015 is the entire platform not hot-upgradeable? The inability to do so is just plain stupidity. (Memory limits / CPU speed etc. don't count -- in Android K and L, a lot of work was done to reduce the memory footprint and increase the VM speed... you only need half a gig of RAM to run Android L.)

  41. We solved this in the 1990s for desktops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We solved this problem (for Linux systems at least) in the 1990s with apt-get. That was the era when desktops had less RAM and processing power than today's smartphones. Why can't android just have an equivalent to apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade?

    When I first heard google was doing a Linux based phone, I thought that will be good, it will make updating really easy and let developers build on the existing code base of all those open source libraries. Unfortunately neither seems to have happened and one area we are suffering from as a result is security.

    1. Re:We solved this in the 1990s for desktops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia tried, the market preferred shiny iphones and cheaper andorids.

  42. Wrong title by qaz123 · · Score: 1

    It's not a Text message (SMS). It's an MMS message. Different technology

  43. Try proofreading next time? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    "According to security firm Zimperium a flaw called "Stagefright" in Google's Android operating system"

    Um, the flaw isn't called stagefright - the flaw is in a component called stagefright!

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  44. Re: idiots (OH NOES THE BOOGIE MAN GONNA GET YOU) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best part is that time will show whether what you say is valid or not. I do think the statement "hackers don't about the exploit" is hard to justify...

  45. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by caseih · · Score: 2

    What are you talking about? What does being in Canada have to do with it? I have rooted, unlocked, and installed CM on several devices including my Virgin Mobile Galaxy S1 and a Kudo Galaxy S2. And all the carriers here allow you to bring your own device if you wish. I brought my unlocked S2 to Telus.

  46. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you counting the WEEKS it took to patch the simple SSL spoofing? Sure, rewrite history as i fans like to do.

    A patch on i devices require a full system update. Android does not.

  47. Rooting is under-rated by emil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When the critical Samsung keyboard exploit hit the news, I was able to do this (and you were not):

    mount -o remount,rw /system
    cd /system/app
    mv SamsungIME.apk SamsungIME.banished
    scp cyanogen:/tmp/LatinIME.apk .
    cd
    mount -o remount,ro /system
    reboot

    I have no intention of relinquishing my ability to repair this vendor-inflicted brain damage because of your foolish misconceptions.

  48. Blame the users: here's why by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    As usual, I prefer to blame the victims (us).

    On a desktop personal computer, it would never occur to you to think "Oh, I just assume I'll get software maintenance from my ISP," and if anyone ever actually said that then you would point your finger at them and laugh and their over-the-top stupidity.

    But change the form factor of the personal computer to handheld and suddenly we don't do the pointing and laughing. On the very face of it, it's JUST AS STUPID. So WTF?

    Users are not exercising their common sense. They simply aren't. You can make excuses for not using common sense and explain why we did this very obviously stupid thing, but don't pretend it's not happening. Every morning you're getting up and putting a "kick me" sign on your back. You know that you're doing it and you know what consequences will invariably flow from it.

    "I don't have any other signs to put on my back! All the signs on the market say 'kick me!'"

    "Just because I wear a 'kick me' sign that doesn't mean anyone really has license to kick me! They shouldn't be doing that to me!"

    Ok, go on and say those things. You even have some valid points, and the things you're saying might even be technically correct. But that doesn't mean you don't sound stupid, because you don't have not getting kicked in your requirements! WTF, people?!

    Stop thinking of handhelds as some weird special case where ALL your experiences with software maintenance magically don't apply! THAT'S STUPID! So yeah, I'm a victim-blamer. You know when you buy your PC from your ISP or from a manufacturer who has a history of preventing maintenance, what's going to happen. And when people pretend they don't know the invariable consequences of buying PCs from ISPs, the stupidity takes on a flavor of dishonesty. Mmmm, yum!

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Blame the users: here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a user in Android you are locked out of the software you are using and cannot update. So blame the ISP that is supposed to manage the java infested, spam crap factory, psudolinux abomination that is Android.

  49. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 1

    A voice of reason.

    Similar setup here, my wife just switched to Fido after unlocking her HTC One. The plan is $15 cheaper if you bring your own device.

  50. Re:..all versions of Android after and including 2 by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    If at first you don't succeed, fucking blame someone else.

    Stop it, you are embarrassing yourself.

    You read the part where Google patched AOSP in 48 hours right? WTF do you want them to do? They don't have the ability push updates to phones issued by Verizon et al., let alone some oddball carrier in Thailand.

  51. Re: idiots (OH NOES THE BOOGIE MAN GONNA GET YOU) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best part is that time will show whether what you say is valid or not. I do think the statement "hackers don't about the exploit" is hard to justify...

    Well I'm not seeing anybody's phone "hacked" or "rooted" or "exploited". This story, and you, are pure bullshit.

    A text/MMS message "exploit" with what payload? What in the actual fuck is it going to do? OH "mysterious hack".

    If it's a bug then it gets a patch. Welcome to the information age. Patching code is not new.

    But all of the headlines are huge grandiose MOTHER OF ALL VULNERABILITIES come to our website!!!
    https://www.google.com/#q=android+text+message+stagefright
    http://www.techworm.net/2015/07/stagefright-attack-it-takes-only-a-single-text-message-to-hack-an-android-smartphone.html

    and bullshit like that. 950 MILLION DEVICES! OH NOES!! Slashdot duped it!?! Every single article I look at is the same shit. All about how "hackers" can "get you" while "you sleep". How many Windows vulnerabilities have there been, and out of ALL THOSE how many times has the number of users been cited simultaneously with "while you sleep"?? FUD. FUD.

    FUD. Two days before Windows 10 comes out a giant story about every android user since 2.2 (and OH SHIT MAYBE EARLIER) are about to be hacked in their sleep. (AND DAMN THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT!!) FUHHHH. Like this is thrillllllller!! Not only that but 9/10 of these FUD stories continue about how slow OEM's like Samsung are always soooo slowwww to rolllll ouuuutttt paaaattches.

    Somebody needs their ass beat for scaring the kids is what's up.

    Windows 10's "NEW FEATURES" are actually the mother of all vulnerabilities. Full public release tomorrow. Not only is it still a closed source (huhuhhuh derp trust our anti-trust company) piece of shit, but introducing a new piece of shit feature that allows sharing of your WiFi keys via Outlook contacts. ENABLED BY DEFAULT.

    Somebody needs their ass beat for scaring the kids is what's up.
    Somebody needs their ass beat for scaring the kids is what's up.

    I have read tech and security for decades. This narrative of Android all of the sudden out of nowhere turns everybody's phones into free password-less ftp download servers and also turns on your camera and mic and spies on you via GPS is fucking retarded.

    eg.
    http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/help/android-mms-stagefright-exploit-t3166457/page3

    ^One commenter cites Cyanogen Mod's Google+
    https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/7iuX21Tz7n8

    Each of those CVE's have the following description
    Description
    ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided.

    Now go take a look at CVE descriptions for other software vulnerabilities like Windows and Flash player etc.
    https://www.qualys.com/research/top10/

    As I said before, nothing to fucking see here. Somebody needs their ass beat for scaring the kids is what's up. If "you're scared" (literal FUD absorbers) you can disable MMS auto-retrieve or edit your build.prop file if you're device is rooted. Holy fuck.