Slashdot Mirror


US Military Stepping Up Use of Directed Energy Weapons

An anonymous reader writes: At a conference on Tuesday, U.S. officials explained that all branches of the military would be increasing their use of lasers and other directed energy weapons. Lieutenant General William Etter said, "Directed energy brings the dawn of an entirely new era in defense." The Navy's laser deployment test has gone well, and they're working on a new prototype laser in the 100-150 kilowatt range. "[Navy Secretary Ray] Mabus said Iran and other countries were already using lasers to target ships and commercial airliners, and the U.S. military needed to accelerate often cumbersome acquisition processes to ensure that it stayed ahead of potential foes."

7 of 83 comments (clear)

  1. Other kinds of energy weapons by abies · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Directed energy weapons are not that interesting. I'm more scared of undirected energy weapon and very curious about ballistic energy weapons.

    1. Re:Other kinds of energy weapons by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Informative
      Undirected energy weapons? You mean like Radars?

      No, more like nuclear bombs. Even if you're outside the zone of blast effects, you'll still receive plenty of undirected thermal radiation.

  2. Re:Correction: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's not an invasion; it's just defense in a different direction.

  3. Pew Pew Pew by Saint+Gerbil · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now they just need to add the sound.

  4. Re:Existential threat is more likely by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Informative

    When you've done the amount of ham fisted nation building and interfering as the USA has done since WW2 you're going to make enemies that you need to defend yourself against.

    Anyway, a common enemy either real of imaginary is an age old method of taking the mind of the people off of internal matters. The Romans were doing it, never mind the USA, and todays best practitioners are Putin and the fat kid running north korea.

  5. Our Leadership, bought and paid for. by Virtucon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "[Navy Secretary Ray] Mabus said Iran and other countries were already using lasers to target ships and commercial airliners"

    Laser targeting != Laser weaponry. I'm surprised that SecNAV doesn't understand the difference although low energy lasers can be fun.

    TFA:

    "Directed energy brings the dawn of an entirely new era in defense," Lieutenant General William Etter, Commander, Continental U.S. North American Aerospace Defense Command Region, told a conference hosted by Booz Allen Hamilton and the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment.

    which reminded me of:

    Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

    This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

    In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

    - Dwight Eisenhower

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  6. Ha ha ha ha..... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rate me -1 troll, but I think it's hilarious that "the science fiction future" for which everyone is optimistically hoping is being brought to us by something so prosaic and "dirty" and anti-utopian as murdering people. (Well, I guess it has been through much of the last 100+ years, as in the internet and aircraft.)

    Kind of like the 'brave new world' of the internet and tech being driven by the porn industry.

    --
    -Styopa