Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Demonstrate the World's First White Lasers

An anonymous reader writes: Scientists and engineers at Arizona State University, in Tempe, have created the first lasers that can shine light over the full spectrum of visible colors. The device's inventors suggest the laser could find use in video displays, solid-state lighting, and a laser-based version of Wi-Fi. Although previous research has created red, blue, green and other lasers, each of these lasers usually only emitted one color of light. Creating a monolithic structure capable of emitting red, green, and blue all at once has proven difficult because it requires combining very different semiconductors. Growing such mismatched crystals right next to each other often results in fatal defects throughout each of these materials. But now scientists say they've overcome that problem. The heart of the new device is a sheet only nanometers thick made of a semiconducting alloy of zinc, cadmium, sulfur, and selenium. The sheet is divided into different segments. When excited with a pulse of light, the segments rich in cadmium and selenium gave off red light; those rich in cadmium and sulfur emitted green light; and those rich in zinc and sulfur glowed blue.

19 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It wasn't nanotubes, or 3D printed, or made by Elon Musk??? WTH!?

    1. Re:What? by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2

      Yeah, plus it came from a "party school", not one of those elite left or right coast schools

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
  2. White! by digsbo · · Score: 4, Funny

    These lasers are oppressing other lasers! They need to check their privilege!

    1. Re:White! by funwithBSD · · Score: 2

      #darklasersmatter

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  3. WRONG by Khyber · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not the first WLL. Those have been available for at least half a decade.

    This is the first SOLID STATE WLL.

    What's unique is that they figured out a way to grow three different crystals next to each other on the same substrate without having fatal flaws.

    Holy fuck can the editors even be bothered to fact-check?

    Oh, yea, what editors?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  4. Not white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    So it's not white, it's tri-colour.

  5. Just what the world needed by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    A racist laser, literally white power.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  6. Summary is inaccurate by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary is inaccurate, or at least confusing. The summary says "lasers that can shine light over the full spectrum of visible colors", but the article says that this is three monochromatic spikes, red, green, blue, which together appear white. It also says that the choice of colors is tunable... but tunable lasers aren't new.

    The summary also implies that it is "a" laser, but the article makes it clear that what they did is make three separate lasers on the same substrate (specifically "three parallel segments, each supporting laser action in one of three elementary colors.")

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Summary is inaccurate by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2

      If the red, green and blue lasers can be 'tuned' for intensity then it can produce colors in the RGB colorspace, which is not necessarily the "full spectrum of visible colors"

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    2. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Jumunquo · · Score: 2

      For light, doesn't RGB cover the entire visible colorspace?

    3. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Khyber · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not necessarily. While these emitters are tunable, I doubt the red is getting down to 700nm, or the blue going into the 400-410nm violet range. Most RGB emitters, even tunable are peak 630nm red and 450-460nm blue. So this wouldn't cover the entire visible colorspace very accurately when it came to deeper reds and violets.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Summary is inaccurate by guises · · Score: 2

      They're also not LASERs (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation), but are rather laser diodes. Am I being too picky when I notice that? Electrical engineers tend to get annoyed when I point out that their version of lasers aren't real lasers.

  7. Re:Great by weilawei · · Score: 2

    That escalated quickly. Knee jerk much?

  8. Even party schools get top notch talent by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 2

    With the lack of jobs for PhD's in academia (and elsewhere), ANY academic job gets tons of applicants. Only the best of the best get *any* job in academia nowadays.

    You can pretty much count on anyone in the US who has a faculty job being one of the best of the best. Furthermore, this person is going to have access to plenty of cheap PhD labor.

    Don't be surprised if you see pretty significant accomplishments coming from previously disregarded places.

    1. Re:Even party schools get top notch talent by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      I considered the academic path, but rejected it as too high-risk. Instead I went into IT support, where I knew I could be confident of always finding employment - albeit at low pay.

      The plan worked: I'm now employed as an underpaid helpdesk-monkey, have had the same job for the best part of a decade, and could have it a decade still.

    2. Re:Even party schools get top notch talent by That_Dan_Guy · · Score: 2

      Dude, study up. I went the same path 15 years ago, right when the Dot Com crash happened. I studied my ass off, got a job doing the monkey thing, found cram schools to teach at, and as soon as I finished off my CCNP I've been employed ever since. I've got MCSEs in NT4, 2000, 2003, and Exchange, CCNA, CCNP R/S, CCNA security, working on CCIE written now (not a cheap test to study for, I'd have gotten it already, but spent years trying not to pay for study materials- the one month I've spent since ponying up has seen me get further than the past 5 years combined), and a few other certs.

      The trick is to NOT brain dump. Use the exams as a self test. Especially the Cisco stuff. The CCNA test bank is like 1000 questions. CCNP isn't much fewer. It's far easier (IMO) to know the stuff than to cram the questions (although I've met plenty of offshore people who have crammed it all in, and are now 100% useless)

      Your other option is to go down the Project Management side of things. I know a guy who did the monkey thing for 15 years, was facing layoffs and got his PMP. He is now the star Project Manager in the company who gets all the failing projects because he is the one guy who can turn them around. He does say he faces a ceiling not having a 4 year degree. But he is also facing ageism for being 55+ (He has had a very interesting and colorful life)

      In other words, get off your butt, and show some motivation. If not, you'll end up like other people I've known that got laid off and could never find another job to save their lives. If you do, you'll NOT be lowly paid.

  9. Re: Progress by goofynewfie · · Score: 2

    I've got a CO2 laser you could look into :)

  10. This would look really cool by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you've ever played with a normal monochrome laser in a dark room, you'll have seen how laser illumination makes things look speckly. Illuminating with this "white" laser will make superimposed speckly in three colours, with the locations of the speckles not coinciding, so it would be iridescent speckly.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  11. And... by WSOGMM · · Score: 3, Funny

    in other related news, researchers tightly focus light bulb light. They contend that their invention should have a wide spectrum of uses, but critics argue that their results aren't coherent.