Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Creates an AI That Can Spot a Joke In a New Yorker Cartoon
An anonymous reader writes: For over a decade Bob Mankoff, the cartoon editor at the New Yorker, and his assistants have gone through 5,000 cartoon entries for the magazine's caption contest each week. Needless to say, the burnout rate of his assistants is quite high, "The process of looking at 5,000 caption entries a week usually destroys their mind in about two years, and then I get a new one," Mankoff says. But now thanks to a collaboration with Microsoft, Bob may finally have found the perfect helper. Researchers have been working on an artificial intelligence project to teach a computer what's funny. Fortune reports: "Dafna Shahaf, a researcher at Microsoft, used the database of cartoons to train the program to understand commonalities and differences in the millions of cartoons, which lets the AI run through the entries the New Yorker receives each week for its back-of-magazine cartoon caption contest. About 55.8% of the time the humans agree with the captions the AI selects, which is a pretty good percentage."
The New Yorker cartoons are about as un-funny as they get. So Microsoft is claiming they can detect something that doesn't even exist.
I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
It just pretends it thinks it's funny because it doesn't want it's friends to think it's dumb.
Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
Now, if they could spot the humor in the joke, I would be quite impressed.
It is 55.8% chance of it picking the same winner as the editor. So not too bad. Suggests it might get rid of a lot of the rubbish entries.
The paper is a bit confusing at first, and the /. summary doesn't help. Basically, they developed a sorting criteria to reduce the amount of work for the editors. In an isolated comparison of two jokes, the funnier joke wins 64% of them on average; this is quite better than a coin!
To get a sorted list, they run a "comparison tournament" between the jokes. The 55.8% number means that the funniest joke is in the top 55.8% of the list on average; if we are willing to occasionally miss a brilliant joke, we can cut the list in a little more than half and still keep most of the great jokes.
The full paper is http://research.microsoft.com/...
It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop at the end. -Douglas Adams
1) Computers will ever only be as smart as the people who program them
2) That we never have to worry about them being smarter than us because only a race of morons would even bother trying find the humor in a New Yorker comic
So, they are putting an AI through a process that destroys a human mind in about two years? What could possibly go wrong?
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Right up there with resume filters, copyrighted content detectors, search engines, and the like, now people will be writing cartoons geared toward the filters. "Well, at least I'm not Donald Trump's cat sipping cheap red wine while waiting in line for the latest iPhone!"
.
Prisencolinensinainciusol. Ol Rait!
Did anyone else misread:
as
My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
The bartender looks at the cartoonist and says "is this some kind of joke?". The cartoonist looks at the AI and says to the bartender and says, "Give him a minute."
"He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
Such as finding humor in New Yorker cartoons.
Data and Joe Piscopo on the Holodeck for 500, Alex.