Slashdot Mirror


HBO, Netflix, and Amazon Targeting Kids

An anonymous reader writes: The latest high-profile show to join one of the major streaming services probably isn't one you watch: Sesame Street. However, it's a clear signal for a growing trend: these services desperately want to corner the market on kid's shows. Netflix has gotten tons of praise for its original series, and it's been quietly putting that production power behind new shows aimed at children. They've also made deals with Disney and Dreamworks to get movies onto the service as quickly as possible. Amazon has been debuting series after series as well, with six pilots for new children's shows landing last month alone. "The battle for kids, at bottom, is about keeping their parents around even when a favorite show about a murderous politician is on hiatus. Streaming services are far easier to cancel and resubscribe than cable-TV ... so the goal is to make that decision harder." Now that HBO is starting to commit to streaming, it's faced with the same problems. By deriving their funding through subscriptions, these companies can avoid the flak YouTube and Hulu are getting for targeting kids with advertisements.

26 of 46 comments (clear)

  1. Sesame St. episode explaining "corner the market" by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    ... these services desperately want to corner the market on kid's shows.

    They desperately want to own more shares of commitments to deliver kid's shows than makers of kid's shows have committed to?

    Sesame Street needs to do a segment explaining the definition of "corner the market".

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  2. Re:Sesame St. episode explaining "corner the marke by laurencetux · · Score: 2

    Maybe IBM can build a Watson module called "Mr Rogers" to do the explaining

  3. kid driven decisions by Wise+Raptor · · Score: 1

    If you're using a tablet as a babysitter it's useful to have access to kid programming. This seems like a no brainer for any of the streaming services.

    1. Re:kid driven decisions by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Really, with a copy of get_iplayer a bit of patience you can grab Furchester Hotel, the new clangers, Dinopaws, Charlie and Lola, Shawn the Sheep, Timmy Time, Chuggington, In the Night Garden, Alphablocks (my 3 year old nephew is teaching himself to read with that one), Numtums and a whole bunch more. Head over to YouTube and there is a bunch of English language Masha and the Bear as well that youtube-dl will grab for you. Load onto tablet and/or install Plex. That's for the under 5 year market, and it's hundreds of hours of content.

  4. Fuck today's candy-assed crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Got the original Looney Tunes or Tom and Jerry cartoons.

    Watch Wile E. Coyote drop a huge boulder on himself, or Tom and Jerry beat the crap out of each other.

    Much better than wishing Dora and Boots would just get lost and never return, or watching the Wiggles get fat over the years.

  5. Targeting? WTF? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read "Targeting" as an allusion to weapons - taking aim with a firearm or dropped munitions.

    The framing implies "very bad", so it makes sense to feel outraged when cigarette makers "target" teenagers, or liquor sellers "target" young adults, or spammers "target" old people.

    Let's put this in perspective: HBO, Amazon, and Netflix aren't "targeting" kids, they are taking over a product that kids like. There's no evidence that Sesame Street is bad for kids in any realistic way.

    On the flip side, if Game of Thrones is any indication, Sesame Street will be even higher quality than it is now, except that every episode a character will die :-)

    1. Re:Targeting? WTF? by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Targeting is the most appropriate word because they are not interested in helping children learn and develop, they are only interested in baiting them with content to target them with manipulative and psychological destructive ads https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., "In the United Kingdom, Greece, Denmark, and Belgium advertising to children is restricted. In Quebec, Sweden and Norway advertising to children under the age of 12 is illegal." Will this ever happen in the United State of America, not bloody likely after all freedom of speech and greed takes precedence (perhaps USA should change to B$A to match the love of advertising and public relations).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Targeting? WTF? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      HBO is no advertising. Their current childrens programming is decent, but you can tell it's an afterthought. I applaud this move.

    3. Re:Targeting? WTF? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Targeting is the most appropriate word because they are not interested in helping children learn and develop, they are only interested in baiting them with content to target them with manipulative and psychological destructive ads https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., "In the United Kingdom, Greece, Denmark, and Belgium advertising to children is restricted. In Quebec, Sweden and Norway advertising to children under the age of 12 is illegal." Will this ever happen in the United State of America, not bloody likely after all freedom of speech and greed takes precedence (perhaps USA should change to B$A to match the love of advertising and public relations).

      They're not advertising. HBO, Amazon and Netflix don't carry ads during programming.

      However, all three of them are subscriber funded (not eyeball funded), which means they're looking at ways to grow their subscriber base all the time. And unique programming that targets not just current subscribers, but to attract new subscribers is the way they do that. Preferably, they want the programming to appeal to those with money to subscribe - they don't want to target the average Joe, because they're unlikely to spend money subscribing.

      So they study who their demographics are, and they realize those people have kids who generally watch good programming, so they buy up that kind of programming. First is to attract new subscribers, second is to keep current subscribers - there are plenty on Amazon, Netflix and HBO who subscribe when their show starts and cancel at the end of the season (or I'm sure for Netflix, a mass binge watching session in the Netflix free trial). So if they can get people to keep paying year-round, that's the plus.

    4. Re:Targeting? WTF? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well basically "They're not advertising. HBO, Amazon and Netflix don't carry ads during programming", is a lie as a substantial amount of content is in fact product advertising masquerading as content (it's called merchandising).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  6. Re:Fta by Cobalt+Jacket · · Score: 2

    PBS stations have always paid fees, representing substantial portions their budgets, for which they have to go panhandle to the public and companies. Now HBO picks up the tab. CTW makes 2x as many episodes, and PBS stations get that same content nine months later *for free.* I doubt children (mine included) will mind the 9 months of reruns during the initial delay.

  7. Hulu does not target children with advertisements by rminsk · · Score: 2

    From the Hulu FAQ: At this time, Hulu Kids is provided for Hulu subscribers without advertisements. While working with our content partners, we collaboratively decided that providing this hub ad-free is the best thing to do for this content.

  8. I don't have any friends who let their kids watch by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    TV.
    OK. I have loser friends. :(

  9. Re:Kids are for goats. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2

    You are all goats. Goats say gleep. GLEEEEEP! GLEEEEEP! Gleep goats GLEEEEP! Gleep say the goats. YOU GOATS!!

    C is for cookie! That's good enough for me!

  10. Re:Hulu does not target children with advertisemen by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    Wait just a second there are you saying the person paying the bill gets the finger while the kid gets ad free cartoons? WTF Hulu?

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  11. Re:Sesame St. episode explaining "corner the marke by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    "To have the greatest market share in a particular industry without having a monopoly" is the definition that Wikipedia gave me.

    Thanks. I stand corrected.

    I was under the impression that "Cornering a Market" referred specifically to the first example they gave - holding more futures contracts than there is available material to fulfil, so one can hold the short-sellers up for whatever money you want - rather than the more general case of having control of enough of the supply, through ANY mechanism, that you can effectively dictate price.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  12. Making some good kids shows by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

    The cartoons that we all loved when we were kids in the 70's absolutely blew. But the live action stuff was way worse for the most part. Other than Sesame Street and The Electric Company, we had miserable crap like Zoom and much worse... the stylings of Sid and Marty Croft.

    Amazon is doing a pretty good job with their new series. They have Annedroids as a direct competitor to the old Saturday Morning live action stuff. It is hokey, and the CGI is low budget. But it is pretty entertaining to the elementary school crowd. Gortimer Gibbon's is sort of a twilight zone meets the Hardy Boys for elementary school kids. Also pretty entertaining and fairly well done - if you are in the target demo.

    Nothing to the level of the animated stuff available from Disney, Nickelodeon or Cartoon Network though. Several of their animated series hold up from elementary all the way to adults. I really don't see college kids glomming onto any of these live action series as stoner favorites. So they aren't that great, but they are better than "Land of the Lost".

  13. Re:Welll.... by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

    I'll see your Babar and raise you a "Fraggle Rock"

  14. netflix != drug dealer by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    So stop using words like 'targeting'. There are no lost souls here, only entertainment and perhaps a bit education. I know how to count to ten in Spanish do this day thanks to Seseme Street; and I'm Canadian.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  15. Re:Welll.... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Doozers!!

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  16. R&D by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

    Since the Internet's brought about a much closer link between research and marketing (think something like Facebook: they can conduct extensive experiments on their userbase, and do) this is more or less a recipe for really nailing down not just how to influence a kid toward products, but how to define the relations of products and people with each other and get the absolute most out of the situation.

    It's not likely to be creating the ultimate drooling cretins slavering after plastic stuff, you have to think bigger for this. It's more about getting ownership of culture itself much like Sesame Street (funded by public television with a 'commons' educational message) became a cultural icon, and snuck lots of interesting things in there during its run.

    Lots of effort went into optimizing how kids could learn, and then after that Blue's Clues went even further in optimizing both how kids learn and how they engage. This would be about probably ignoring how they learn (or selling the content to whoever's buying) and optimizing how they engage and how they make persistent connections with external products, brands and services. I don't think learning gets to be front and center when the funding is strictly 2015 corporate monster, and beyond. The whole concept of a common social interest in learning is basically shot at this point.

    Could be worse. Could literally be Facebook. I think Amazon's a little more suspect than HBO. You have to look at what the primary agenda of the megacorporation in question is. HBO's branded entertainment. Amazon is more 'internet disruptive', so they have more of an agenda with children, much like if Uber was funding this.

  17. No, someone else is being targeted by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Of course they're targeting kids; companies always have, in order to increase revenue by proxy.

    No, what this story suggests to me is that the "for the children" narrative that usefully scares the right and center, is now being deployed in a way that might better trigger the anti corporate left.

    --
    -Styopa
  18. Re:Evolution I guess by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    Actually, Nick seems to want to be ESPN jr. They have dumped alot of their preshool programming and have some weird new emphasis no Nick Sports.

  19. What happens in Brazil by projetoxvx · · Score: 1

    Here in Brazil the TV companies are trying to force companies like netflix to produce at least one content, before acting on the parents , I think it 's a shame . What do you think?

    1. Re:What happens in Brazil by projetoxvx · · Score: 1

      PS: Still have companies from other branches like Xvideos XXX that does the same.

  20. Netflix by SejaAlpha · · Score: 1

    Netflix will dominate world! Dont forget, be machoalfa.com