Slashdot Mirror


Two Arrests In Denmark For Spreading Information About Popcorn Time

An anonymous reader writes: You may recall Popcorn Time, the software that integrated torrents with a streaming media player. It fell afoul of the law quite quickly, but survived and stabilized. Now, out of Denmark comes news that two men operating websites related to Popcorn Time have been arrested, and their sites have been shut down. It's notable because the sites were informational resources, explaining how to use the software. They did not link to any copyright-infringing material, they were not involved with development of Popcorn Time or any of its forks, and they didn't host the software. "Both men stand accused of distributing knowledge and guides on how to obtain illegal content online and are reported to have confessed."

44 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. Confessed? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NEVER confess to anything! All they've done is to hang themselves. Gubbermint says, "We don't like what you're doing." Your response? Are you really going to tell gubbermint, "Oh, I'm so sorry - please, just lock me away for a few decades!"

    The better response is, "Prove your case, assholes!"

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    1. Re:Confessed? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Funny

      But they each weighed as much as a duck, and therefore were made of wood. . .

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:Confessed? by fnj · · Score: 2

      It depends on whether the prosecutors think they can get an easy pinch. Probably they were threatened with the wrath of Khan if they DIDN'T confess. The Man usually says something like "Look, we've got you dead to rights you know, we will squash you so thin like a bug if you make us take it to a trial. Or ... you can get off much lighter if you just confess."

      Faced with the choice between the ruination of their life, or basically a bad hair day for some months, or a very few years, and considering the expense of taking it to trial, guess what most people would do.

    3. Re:Confessed? by PraiseBob · · Score: 3

      Pleading guilty or taking a plea bargain is entirely different than confessing to a crime. In a plea bargain, you are admitting guilt for a bartered reduction in penalty, and have a contract in writing. If you confess to police, you have no more defense. The police have no capacity to grant you leniency for cooperating, no matter what they claim. Instead, you are making it easier for the court system to convict you, by a HUGE margin. You are not only confessing that you committed a crime, but also confirming that a crime occurred. Now the courts have less incentive to offer a plea bargain, and will offer a worse deal or no deal, because they are more certain of a conviction. By confessing, you are giving away the biggest, and often times only, bargaining chip you have.

    4. Re:Confessed? by stackOVFL · · Score: 2

      This ^, cops are not interviewing you so you can go on your marry way. The more you say the deeper in shit you'll be. Best advice I got from a cop is "zip it, zip it good!"

    5. Re:Confessed? by turbidostato · · Score: 2

      "You seem to forget just how fucking expensive it is to defend against even wrongful accusations."

      You seem to forget a minor detail: this has happened in Denmark, not USA.

    6. Re:Confessed? by NicBenjamin · · Score: 2

      Dude,

      That's in the US. Denmark is a separate country, with an entirely separate legal system. It may be wise to tell them "yes I did those things you are alleging, and if your interpretation of the law is correct I am guilty," and then fight the interpretation of the law.

      For a really prominent example of the Bad Things that happen when you try to apply American rights in a non-American legal system look at Amanda Knox. In the US claiming a confession is coerced is a no-brainer. It's pretty much the only way to get a confession thrown out. In Italy it got her convicted of (and sentenced to a few years in jail for) slander.

    7. Re:Confessed? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow. There's no reverse-Godwins Law, you know. You can't stretch the thread out into infinity by saying ludicrous shit about Hitler.

    8. Re:Confessed? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      "This is Europe, not the USA. They're likely to get pretty light sentences at most if not just probation and a fine."

      Let's try applying logic to this question. If the European sentence for mass murder is assumed as being one breivik, a unit of punishment equal to 21 Earth years, then Adolf Hitler would have gotten a full life sentence of Br 4.0, and the Popcorn Time boys would get about a microbreivik suspended.

      But this is law, not logic. The MPAA/RIAA occupies the same place in European jurisprudence that the Holy Inquisition did around 1500, and can probably exact similar punishments.

    9. Re:Confessed? by ewibble · · Score: 2

      Hitler was worse, while I am able believe more people where killed in rubber plantations than death camps. The main purpose of the death camps was to kill, they specifically had gas chambers to kill people. While the plantations being cruel and inhumane, (well all forms of slavery really) their primary purpose was to make money, so greed was the driving factor not hate.

      from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      The group selected to die, about three-quarters of the total, included almost all children, women with small children, all the elderly, and all those who appeared on brief and superficial inspection by an SS doctor not to be completely fit.

      If you wanted a work force you would not kill the children, since they would grow up to be labor. In fact why would you even capture them if you didn't want them to work. The fact is Hilter wanted them all dead, if he could get some work out of them while killing them why not.

      This is the difference between murder and manslaughter, and to me murder is much worse.

    10. Re:Confessed? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      This is not clear cut. It's not far off the debate on the relative cruelty of life sentences vs death sentences.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    11. Re:Confessed? by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      Pleading guilty or taking a plea bargain is entirely different than confessing to a crime. In a plea bargain, you are admitting guilt for a bartered reduction in penalty, and have a contract in writing. If you confess to police, you have no more defense. The police have no capacity to grant you leniency for cooperating, no matter what they claim. Instead, you are making it easier for the court system to convict you, by a HUGE margin. You are not only confessing that you committed a crime, but also confirming that a crime occurred. Now the courts have less incentive to offer a plea bargain, and will offer a worse deal or no deal, because they are more certain of a conviction. By confessing, you are giving away the biggest, and often times only, bargaining chip you have.

      Plea bargaining (when you know you are innocent) would surely be perjury and not allowed in any civilized country? Surely?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    12. Re:Confessed? by dougmc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Free lawyers for defendants in criminal courts in the United States too! ... and from what I've heard, they're worth every penny.

    13. Re:Confessed? by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 4, Informative

      So? The Nazi Germany didn't do anything that other countries, including Britain, France, Netherlands, Belgium, etc., had not also done. The only difference is that Hitler did it to white people.

      More people were killed in forced labor on rubber plantations, than in all the Nazi death camps combined.

      That is misleading; those figures for Congo are "depopulation" losses, not people killed. No other comparison points implied, but several western countries these days are being "depopulated" due to falling birth numbers, that doesn't mean there are secret massacres going on. "Depopulation" also includes population losses from people deciding to only have 1-2 kids instead of 3-4 kids needed to sustain the population.

      Sure, there were huge atrocities going on in Congo, but the numbers you are quoting aren't only about people being killed as forced labor on rubber plantation as you claim. According to your cited source, the majority died of "sleeping sickness", still a killer disease in Congo these days.

      The Death camps however where targeted killing machines, murdering people sometimes minutes after they had arrived by train. They also killed millions of people in a very short time, basically a couple of years, while the Congo depopulation took 40 years. The Nazi war on the eastern front killed +27 million people in 3-4 years in comparison.

      Also of interest is that the (at least) 6 millions Jews killed was just the warm-up, since Mischlinge (half/quarter/etc Jewish descent) was next, and with the "General Plan Ost", the Nazi regime basically intended to exterminate all Slavic people from Poland to the Ural mountains except for a small amount that was to be kept as slaves.

      Saying that Hitler and the Nazi regime only did what the British, Belgians etc, had done previously is just plain out wrong. There has never been anything remotely like the Nazi Death camps before.

      There has also never been anything in both scale and intentions that have ever matched the Nazi regime when it came to Genocide, not even Stalin's USSR.

    14. Re:Confessed? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      While true it doesn't really change a thing in this case. Yes, you only get to pay the fees after the verdict and yes, you only get to pay if you lose.

      Sadly, the game is rigged to ensure that you lose. So you can afford to go the whole length of the case. And THEN you're broke. Because one thing is certain: You will be guilty.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Confessed? by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      I don't know, do the US count as a civilized country?

      Apparently not... encouraging perjury? Thats a slippery slope for a legal system.

      "You know you are innocent, we know you are probably innocent too. But if you just lie and plead guilty it'd just make everyones lives so much easier so go ahead, please lie under oath."

      Thats not even a real legal system if it positively encourages such blatant disregard and disrespect for the process of law.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    16. Re:Confessed? by NicBenjamin · · Score: 2

      That's all relevant to the US, not Denmark. I suspect that the legal contexts are so different that the very phrase "confession" may have a completely different definition.

      ie: if you're in the US, and you tell the cops you shot that guy, but it was not murder it was self-defense; or you admit that you took those videos of the police but the statute banning videos of the police is invalid; etc. it would not be considered a confession because you aren't admitting to legal guilt. And to use those defenses effectively you'd have to bring them up very early in the investigation (just try convincing a Jury that you shot that dude in self-defense when your first story to the cops was that you were in Vegas that day).

      I strongly suspect what's happened is that the cops decided these guy's sites were illegal, they brought said guys in after whatever legal paperwork is required, they said "is this your site?" and the guys said "yes." And then when they found out they were about to be arrested for posting the sites they pointed out that their sites aren't illegal. Some reporter whose fluent in Danish, but only high-level-conversational in English, and worse in legal English, called this a "confession." After all, they admitted they did what the cops were accusing them of, and did not realize that in English particular word strongly imples you're about to beg the Judge to give you the minimum allowable sentence.

  2. Thoughtcrime! by asimons04 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Next, we should go after the language teachers because they facilitate this illegal behavior by teaching people how to read and write. If that doesn't make sense, then you are much smarter than these authority figures because that has about as much to do with committing a crime as what these people have done.

    1. Re: Thoughtcrime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Comparing copyright infringement to murder for hire. You're the moron.

    2. Re:Thoughtcrime! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      Oh please. You're a moron. This is no different from a mob boss telling his underlings whom to kill. You would probably argue that the mob boss was simply using his freedom of speech to express his opinion. Speech has consequences and in this case, it's piracy.

      What a clownish statement. First of all, ordering a hit is a crime because murder is. Saying how to shoot a gun is not. Saying how to shoot to kill is not -- gun training courses do exactly that.

      I have a sympathetic ear that the real goal is 99% illegal downloads, but that is the crime. Properly speaking, nobody granted government power to regulate free speech to begin with, but these are vox populi vox dei parliaments that fly by the seat of their majorities, so YMMV.

      Both men stand accused of distributing knowledge

      Not one further word need be read to know this government is using power no free citizen would ever grant it to begin with in their right mind. Reason: Your own damned murderous history.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Thoughtcrime! by s.petry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The original reference to teachers was not comparable either.

      It was not supposed to be comparable, it was supposed to demonstrate the dangers of prosecuting people for non-crimes based on what someone speculates as intent.

      Copyright issues isn't as damaging to society as say a web sites that enables access to drug dealers.

      That may be true, but you are also incorrectly attempting to equate apples to orangutans. These guys were not publishing maps to drug dealers, and even if they were that would not be illegal (at least in the US). Arrest records are public information which would give someone enough to know where to buy drugs. While it may seem sleezy to publish such a map, it certainly would not be illegal. These guys were only publishing information, not providing the tools to use the information with.

      Since you can not make a fair comparison either, how about I give you one? "The Anarchists Cookbook" is not illegal to possess and not illegal to purchase (again, at least in the US). That book contains information on how to do illegal things too, and nobody is going to jail over that book.

      An even better comparison may be to a crime novel. There is lots of information in those about how to break the law. Are those illegal also? How about a book that shows the parts of a Machine gun, are those now illegal because anyone can go to a URL and read how to take one apart and put it together? Machine guns are illegal right?

      My advice to anybody is to avoid getting involved in enabling illegal activities or be willing to accept possible consequences.

      My advice to you is to learn some history and stop defending non-event prosecution. Perhaps then you would realize how dangerous the process you are backing really is. Immunity for people who think they are in the club generally does not last very long. Chinese and Russian history is full of examples.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    4. Re:Thoughtcrime! by s.petry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Copyright issues isn't as damaging to society as say a web sites that enables access to drug dealers.

      That may be true, but you are also incorrectly attempting to equate apples to orangutans

      It's not because there is proof that some encouragement of illegal activities is available and not reprimanded that it's not illegal. I can jerk off in front of your house all day but until someone calls the cops about it I'm not going to be charge for it. If nobody cares it won't see the light of day. Keep in mind that US is one of the few places where hate speech is allowed and the laws are very different in other countries such as Denmark in this case.

      My advice to you is to learn some history

      Why are you getting personal?

      You ignoring history is not personal, it's a statement of fact. I provided two recent examples of what happens when a government is allowed to make arbitrary rulings by guessing intent. I could add Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, Italy, Germany, Cuba, and I'll stop there because you should get the point. If you want to defend your position show me where history is wrong. In fact show me in history where allowing this type of ruling has not turned out catastrophically for the majority of the population.

      My advice to you is to learn some history and stop defending non-event prosecution. Perhaps then you would realize how dangerous the process you are backing really is. Immunity for people who think they are in the club generally does not last very long. Chinese and Russian history is full of examples.

      Oh look, I played with a knife and I cut myself. Why are people surprised when this happens? I don't need history to tell me that publishing information about illegal activities is playing with fire. You piss someone off enough they'll make it their life's work to ruin yours. It's exactly what is happening here. History has many example of this too.

      Take a minute to review the definition of accessory to a crime: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      If you want to defend your position show me where my examples were wrong instead of making up more invalid comparisons and nonsense.

      How is these people publishing text any different than the Anarchist's handbook? How is this different than writing up "how to" guides for taking apart machine guns?

      You are claiming that writing and publishing here is a crime because you say the subject matter is dangerous. I provided equally dangerous materials which won't result in jail. I have been courteous enough to demonstrate my position. I provided other dangerous material which would not result in publishing being a crime.. Demonstrate your yours and show me the logic. Reality please, not more unrelated fluff.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  3. Popcorn time loves barbara streisand by Linkreincarnate · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I didnt know about it before and now I do. Thanks sweden. Now sue yourselves.

    1. Re:Popcorn time loves barbara streisand by rjmx · · Score: 2

      I'd suspect that it's simply the publicity they've generated by prosecuting these guys. You know about it now, don't you? Now, if they'd just let things be, nobody would have been any the wiser.

    2. Re:Popcorn time loves barbara streisand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      He HAD TO say it was Sweden. If he said the correct country, he'd be "spreading information" which we now know is a crime.

    3. Re:Popcorn time loves barbara streisand by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

      I see the distinction, but I don't honestly see a difference.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Popcorn time loves barbara streisand by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 3, Funny

      His refusal to distinguish is hate speech. Go straight to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  4. Is there a law? by captnjohnny1618 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Against this:

    "Both men stand accused of distributing knowledge and guides on how to obtain illegal content online and are reported to have confessed."

    ?

    If there is, then they are probably in violation. But aren't there other resources on how to do illegal things that don't get shut down? Plenty of folks have written about how to get onto Silk Road and buy drugs and yet we haven't seen those sites disappear... curious. Just goes to show they don't care about whether its illegal or not, only if it *slightly* affects their bottom line. But we all knew that already, didn't we?

    1. Re:Is there a law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In order to exceed the speed limit follow these steps...

      1. Turn on your car
      2. Put your car in a drive gear.
      3. Depress the accelerator pedal until the speedometer shows a value higher than the posted speed limit. (Try to avoid obstacles.)

      I'm off to the police station to confess. Bye /.

    2. Re:Is there a law? by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      What does stealing have to do with this case?
      Copyright infringement is not theft

    3. Re:Is there a law? by unrtst · · Score: 2

      Then you may not want to read this article on Wired, "10 Guns, Bombs, and Weapons You Can Build at the Airport": http://www.wired.com/2013/12/t...
      Let alone the myriad of books that have been published on exactly the topic you describe, and loads and loads of "fiction" in movies, tv, books, etc following the same. You must really hate Dexter.

  5. Re:stop them ! by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Popcorn Time steals from the lives of the people who created this content. Those who aid and abet thieves should get put away. I realize this forum exists solely to promote ripping off GoT episodes, but, come ON. Wake up people.

    You just provided information regarding the types of shows available on Popcorn Time. Now they are going to arrest you too.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  6. The dog in the manger by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So what's the lawful way to view, say, the film Song of the South or the TV series Spartakus and the Sun Beneath the Sea? I've never tried Popcorn Time, but I know these works tend to be missing from lawful streaming services' libraries. If there is none, how does this "dog in the manger" mentality "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts", as one country's constitution puts it?

  7. So arrested for what they think, basically...? by mark-t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Both men stand accused of distributing knowledge and guides on how to obtain illegal content online

    That what they were distributing was information on how to break the law is wholly irrelevant to the subject at hand, which is that they were sill ultimately arrested for distributing knowledge... effectively making legislating what people are allowed to even *THINK* about.

  8. Thought crimes? by BellyJelly · · Score: 2

    Prosecuted for the distribution of knowledge? I thought the Danes would be better than that....

  9. Counterproductive by mu51c10rd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These arrests seem counterproductive. I was not aware of Popcorntime at all, but with this media coverage, am now more inclined to take a look at it. The media companies need to rethink their strategy. These services become more popular when they get them in the public eye (Napster, Limewire, Gnutella, PirateBay, etc.)

  10. How about spreading knowledge of how to murder? by CODiNE · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Crime shows and heist films are educating bank robbers and future murderers, teaching them how to plan bank robberies and how to hide murders. They even show the process of how the police typically catch other bank robbers and murderers, further educating them on how to avoid police detection. The entire cast of CSI needs to report to the local precinct ASAP.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  11. Libraries are next by dcollins117 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    May as well dismantle libraries next. They are chock full of information that could be used to subvert the state. The last thing government wants is a well-educated populace.

  12. Until now ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... I was unfamiliar with Popcorn Time. But thanks to the Danish police, I am now familiar with the service. The Danish police need to arrest themselves immediately!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  13. Re:Two arrests in Denmark for Murder Time (TM) by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bullocks.

    And that's not "unhealthy" or "libertarian-leaning" or anything. That's freedom of thought, speech, and press, plain and simple. And the concept predates the mass adoption of the internet by decades.

    Remember dead-tree bookstores? In the mid-90s, you could walk into pretty much any Barnes & Nobles, find on the shelves, and buy a copy of "The Anarchist Cookbook", Abby Hoffman's "Steal This Book", any number of the Hayduke "Getting Even" books, PIHKAL, TIHKAL, and occasionally they would even have "The Poor Man's James Bond". Any and all of those contain instructions on howto do things that were and are illegal. Some of them actively encourage those actions. And that's in a mainstream chain book store that used to be in every town of any significant population. If you checked out independent "alternative" bookstores or bookstores aimed at activist communities in large cities you'd find stuff even more colorful. And it's all 100% legal, because we punish people for ACTIONS, not writings or thoughts. And there's absolutely no reason whatsoever for that to be different because computers.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  14. Re:Two arrests in Denmark for Murder Time (TM) by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What's not valid about your analogy is that peer-to-peer video sharing can be perfectly legal, whereas murder never is. What Popcorn Time needs is a tracker dedicated to fully legal videos -- Max Fleischer out-of-copyright cartoons, the Blender Foundation animations, how-tos on video production etc. P2P has legitimate non-infringing uses, and there should be people focusing on doing that. Consider the amount of genuinely free stuff on PirateBay etc. It's not a notable proportion of the P2P traffic, but it still would be enough to merit its own tracker.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  15. Re:Two arrests in Denmark for Murder Time (TM) by unrtst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well said.

    I also have a huge issue with Beerdood's statement that, "Maybe it's time to re-think your principles and realize that "information" that supports or promotes illegal activity should be taken down, regardless of how severe the crime is". Fuck that.

    Laws change, and that change often comes through education of others. Promoting women's suffrage in the 1800's should not be illegal. Documenting how a Jewish person might escape Germany in 1945 should not be illegal. I'm not surprised that those in power want it to be illegal to simply document how to do something that might have an impact on their bottom line and may violate copyright laws in some (ok, most) jurisdictions, but we should not consider that acceptable. One may argue otherwise, but I feel this would fall directly under Amendment I of the US Bill of Rights (and yes, I realize this is not taking place in the US, but these are an enumeration of what many believe to be unalienable rights).

    They're not forcing anyone to read those pages; They're not distributing copyrighted works, or even links to copyrighted works; The wrong parties are being sought out there - those that are violating the copyrights should be the targets. The problem with that is that Beerdood would likely be charged, just as would most of the RIAA, MPAA, the lawyers, and most of society as well.

  16. Re: Two arrests in Denmark for Murder Time (TM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The majority of cars and roads are used for the illegal activities of speeding, illegal lane changes, running red lights, drunk driving, and a host of other crimes. Roads and cars should be banned.

  17. Re:stop them ! by Alok · · Score: 3

    Copyright is completely insane anyway, and this has desensitized many people from breaking it at will when they can. We no longer have sane terms like 14 years after first publication (which iirc was the original term in US before all the extensions to make it a multi-generational cash cow). If that was still the case, then piracy would perhaps have not taken off in such a big way in the first place, because the public would be more supportive of creators getting reimbursed for their content.

    However, with the current BS terms, it is 'illegal' to watch ancient movies or cartoons (hello Disney!) or listen to decades-old songs (Sonny Bono act) without paying for the privilege. Even most individual countries cannot set terms as they wish thanks to the Berne convention which imposes a *minimum* of 50 years. So, the public starts to pirate due to this perceived unfairness; which is their only response since the politicians are bought & paid for by the entertainment industry.

    As for 'ripping off GoT episodes', those are fairly recent and shouldn't be as justified - but the problem is that when everyone is accustomed to piracy due to eternal copyrights; then people no longer distinguish carefully about newer or older works.