Slashdot Mirror


NVIDIA Launches $159 Mainstream Maxwell-Based GeForce GTX 950

MojoKid writes: NVIDIA is launching a new mainstream graphics card today, the GeForce GTX 950, based on the company's GM206 GPU. The GM206 debuted on the GeForce GTX 960, which launched a few months back. As the new card's name suggests though, the GM206 used on the GeForce GTX 950 isn't quite as powerful as the one used on the GTX 960. The company is targeting this card at MOBA (massive online battle arena) players, who don't necessarily need the most powerful GPUs on the market, but want smooth, consistent framerates at resolutions of 1080p or below. It's being positioned as a significant, yet affordable, upgrade over cards like the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, that are a couple of generations old. NVIDIA's reference specifications for the GeForce GTX 950 call for a base clock of 1024MHz and a Boost clock of 1188MHz. The GPU is packing 768 CUDA cores, 48 texture units, and 32 ROPs. The 2GB of video memory on GeForce GTX 950 cards is clocked at a 6.6GHz (effective GDDR5 data rate) and the memory links to the GPU via a 128-bit interface. At those clocks, the GeForce GTX 950 offers up a peak textured fillrate of 49.2 GTexels/s and 105.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. At a $159 starting MSRP, in the benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 950 offers solid entry level or midrange performance at 1080p resolutions. It's a bit faster than AMD's Radeon R9 270X but comes in just behind a Radeon R9 285.

9 of 85 comments (clear)

  1. Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'll wait five years to pick up this card for $50 and buy this year's video games for $5 each on Steam.

    1. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why pay $60 per video game when Steam will eventually have them on sale for $5 or less? I can get 12 older games for the price of a brand new game. Video cards are no different.

    2. Re:Meh... by pepty · · Score: 2

      I was never a big gamer - probably because what I want most from a game is to be amazed, or at least surprised. The vertigo from stepping onto the bridge in Half Life 2 - stuff like that. Some of those moments do require a moderately decent setup, and for that the ~$150 price point for GPUs has generally fit the bill for FPS games for quite some time now.

  2. Re:Is this better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Guide to understanding Nvidia video card models:

    First number is the series, basically the generation of the card
    Second number is the tier, basically its performance in context with other cards in that series, the bigger that number the better

    The letters are the "quality" and go
    SE/LE - Very low
    GS - Low
    GSO - Below GT but above GS
    GT - Standard/Normal
    GTS - Good
    GTO - Usually a binned GTX, High
    GTX - Very high
    Ultra - Usually an OC'd GTX
    GX2 - 2 GPU's

  3. Overkill for MOBAs by flink · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If this is targeted at MOBA players, then it is probably overkill. I've got a 2011 Mac Pro with a Radeon 5870 (850Mhz GPU, 1GB VRAM). Playing League of Legends at 1920x1200, 60fps is no problem for this setup. These games are not graphically intensive, nor do they require much CPU horsepower. If you are going to drop money on hardware for MOBA gaming, spend it on a nice keyboard/mouse and the lowest latency ISP you can find. If your machine is less than 5 years old, whatever came stock is more than enough to play the game.

  4. Re:Is this better? by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the number on my card is 970. This is 950. Are smaller numbers better than bigger numbers?

    For your wallet, in general yes. Also for your power bill.

    Or is this an older card that they've kept in a box for a year before revealing to the world?

    It's basically the same technology as the 970, on a chip half the size.

    How would this improve my life?

    Judging by the inaneness of your post, the only way is up.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  5. Re:Ridiculous upgrade path by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

    Both the 650 Ti and the 950 are built on a 28nm process. Sure, that's not the only parameter that matters but I don't think it's a reasonable upgrade path at all. If you need more performance you should probably go for something bigger, or better yet, wait until 14/16nm becomes a reality for GPUs.

    They are saying that to try and keep the money flowing...

    For people at 1080p, I have a hard time imaging that a 650 Ti is "out of date" by any stretch. If it is, a 950 isn't the solution, a 970 would be.

    Is the 950 faster? Sure... Is it "faster enough to be worth the time and trouble"? Probably not.

  6. a significant upgrade? really? by slacka · · Score: 2

    a significant, yet affordable, upgrade over cards like the GeForce GTX 650 Ti,

    I guess Nvidia's marketing drones think we're all a bunch of rich morons. That's exactly the card I have now, and there's no way in hell I'm stupid enough to pay $150 for a few extra FPS. Just look at those benchmarks, like Metro's 27 vs 36 avg FPS. If I need a few extra FPS, I'll lower the quality a bit and wait until a TRUE mid-range upgrade is available.

    The real question here is WTH is going on with Moore's law? I paid about $150 for my 650 back in 2012, and here we are 3 years later, and my $150 buys essentially the same performance and features.

  7. Re:Is this better? by rtb61 · · Score: 2

    I have found the current Nvidia 750 Ti to be quite effective, quiet, not much power drawn and does the job, quite a surprise value card.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen