Slashdot Mirror


Hyperloop Getting Closer To Reality, Groundbreaking Set For 2016

An anonymous reader writes: On Thursday, Hyperloop Transportation Technologies (HTT) said it would break ground on the futuristic railway in May 2016. The company says it has signed agreements with Oerlikon Leybold Vacuum and engineering design firm Aecom to work on the project. "It's a validation of the fact that our model works," says Dirk Ahlborn, CEO of Hyperloop Transportation Technologies. "It's the next step."

107 comments

  1. Phase two: HTT --> TTS by viperidaenz · · Score: 1
  2. Vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what happens when the capsule springs a leak and you cannot bre . .a..

    1. Re:Vacuum? by aaronmd · · Score: 3, Informative

      So what happens when the capsule springs a leak and you cannot bre . .a..

      Ever ridden on an airplane?

    2. Re:Vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They fly in a vacuum?

    3. Re:Vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what happens when the capsule springs a leak and you cannot bre . .a..

      Ever ridden on an airplane?

      Airplanes don't go into space! There is air around them while they fly, otherwise their wings wouldn't generate lift, unlike this capsule which is surrounded by a vacuum. Your post doesn't make any sense.

    4. Re: Vacuum? by t1oracle · · Score: 1

      It's only a partial vacuum and the surrounding areas is not a vacuum. They can just equalize the pressure locally.

    5. Re:Vacuum? by aaronmd · · Score: 1

      > Ever ridden on an airplane?

      That is Republican-style logic. Planes are not in a vacuum. I know you Republicans don't understand that, but planes are in the air. They do not fly in space. I repeat, and I'll try to type slower for you, they do not go into space. There isn't a vacuum around a plane when flying. After all, if it was a vacuum the wings wouldn't make life, but I wouldn't expect you Republicans to understand that. Please just stop posting. Your kind is ruining this site with your anti-science xian garbage.

      The question was what happens when there is a leak and you cannot breathe, not what happens if there is a complete loss of cabin pressure/air. I answered the question that was posed. So take your uppity attitude and go for a walk.

    6. Re:Vacuum? by aaronmd · · Score: 1

      The question was what happens when there is a leak and you cannot breathe, not what happens if there is a complete loss of cabin pressure/air. Planes don't fly in a vacuum, but they do fly in substantially less air pressure, which is why we pressurize planes. If the capsule lost all air pressure then yeah, they're going to have a really bad time and air masks are not going to save them, but as another answered they would seal off the segment and provide local atmosphere.

    7. Re:Vacuum? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the cabin air leaks out of a plane at 13,000m, you'll be dead in 6 minutes. If you were in intergalactic space (about as hard a vacuum as you can experience) and the air leaked out of your spaceship, you'd be dead in six minutes. If you were on Mars and your spacesuit was punctured losing all of the air, you'd be dead in six minutes.

    8. Re:Vacuum? by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      1. Let's say it all together: "Hyperloop Is Not A Vactrain". It's like a super-high-altitude aircraft, at ground level, operating in ground effect. It actually needs the (super thin) air it moves through for lift. The air gets built up in front of the capsule and shunted via a compressor to underneath it (for lift) and behind it, to prevent the buildup of air resistance.

      2. The difficulties of providing oxygen through masks are no greater in a hyperloop capsule than in an airplane.

      3. A hyperloop capsule is a giant air ram which has to work to move its air to behind the vehicle. If you get a leak in the front, you're ramming air into the capsule. If you get a leak on the back, that's where the compressor is shoving the air into. Significant air is also getting compressed into the tiny areas on the sides.

      4. In the event of major emergencies, the tube is designed to repressurize, with the cars settling onto their low speed wheels and cruising to the nearest emergency exit. Repressurization can surely be done far faster than an airplane can descend in altitude.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    9. Re: Vacuum? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      So you're saying there's a chance.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    10. Re:Vacuum? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Not on your life, my Hindu friend!

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    11. Re:Vacuum? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      What about us brain-dead slobs?

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    12. Re:Vacuum? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Some airplanes are made to appear as if they had gone into space, and filmed the interior of the "ISS" in a narrow tube that fits inside the vomit comet as well.

      Airplanes don't go into space, but satellites go into pools.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    13. Re: Vacuum? by Thing+1 · · Score: 2

      Bees? The guns on Mars shoot bees, as I recall.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    14. Re:Vacuum? by westlake · · Score: 1

      It's like a super-high-altitude aircraft, at ground level

      In other words, moving in air so super-thin and close to a vacuum as makes no difference.

      2. The difficulties of providing oxygen through masks are no greater in a hyperloop capsule than in an airplane.

      The oxygen mask aboard an airplane is good for ten minutes. The airplane flies in open air not inside a sealed pipeline mounted on pylons and elevated rather high above the ground.

      This isn't anything like the Channel Tunnel which has a parallel and built-in escape route.

      3. A hyperloop capsule is a giant air ram which has to work to move its air to behind the vehicle

      No movement, no compression.

      Repressurization can surely be done far faster than an airplane can descend in altitude.

      As the bird flies, the distance between San Diego and San Francisco is 450 miles.

      No one is certain, but it's thought that a China Airlines 747 might have gone supersonic during an emergency descent in 1985. According to the Wikipedia article, "Altitude decreased 10,000 ft (3,000 m) within only twenty seconds." and "They had descended 30,000 ft (9,100 m) in under two and a half minutes".

      How rapidly can a commercial aircraft descend?

    15. Re:Vacuum? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      speaking of the channel tunnel wouldn't something like that be the logical first use for this thing?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re:Vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the wings wouldn't make life

      wings have wombs now?

    17. Re:Vacuum? by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Informative

      Easy. Masks drop from above you and emergency braking and re-pressurization is started. If braking to a safe velocity (say, 300km/h) is limited to 0.5G then it can be completed in about 40 seconds. Then once everybody have slowed down, emergency vents can open and the tube can be quickly re-pressurized to breathable pressures. You will survive even in the case of immediate complete pressure loss and failure to put on a mask.

    18. Re: Vacuum? by theCzechGuy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like a private company making supply runs to ISS! Complete nonsense made up by people who don't know anything about the problem and didn't spend two minutes thinking it through! It will never happen! I'm telling ya!

    19. Re:Vacuum? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      As the bird flies, the distance between San Diego and San Francisco is 450 miles.

      Why would you need to get to the destination? Surely you'd be able to close sections of the tube and repressurise it. Or pressurise the whole thing. There's a ready supply of air at standard pressure just outside the loop.

    20. Re:Vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too short a distance. This needs time to speed up and slow down.

    21. Re: Vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is this "private company" that is making supply runs to the ISS without massive injections of tax money and tax-money-developed technology? Because SpaceX is basically a leech off NASA and doesn't really qualify as "private", except in the part where the profits off government-paid work are privatized.

    22. Re:Vacuum? by Rei · · Score: 1

      You'll be given cushy jobs!

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    23. Re:Vacuum? by Rei · · Score: 1

      In other words, moving in air so super-thin and close to a vacuum as makes no difference.

      The air immediately around the capsule is not as sparse as the bulk air in the tube, due to the compression of the moving capsule.

      The oxygen mask aboard an airplane is good for ten minutes.

      Versus the matter of seconds it would take to repressurize a tube at maximum rate.

      The airplane flies in open air not inside a sealed pipeline

      With regularly spaced emergency exits

      mounted on pylons and elevated rather high above the ground.

      This is a joke, right? Airplanes operate in the ballpark of 10km altitude. Hyperloop ranges from ground level to a couple dozen meters altitude.

      This isn't anything like the Channel Tunnel which has a parallel and built-in escape route.

      Yes, the design does call for regularly spaced escape routes. Read the damned design document before debating the concept on an open forum.

      No movement, no compression.

      No movement, no low pressure air. The tube is designed to be repressurized in the event of an incident.

      As the bird flies, the distance between San Diego and San Francisco is 450 miles.

      Which is utterly irrelevant to the conversation. Repressurization is not to happen from the endpoints.

      No one is certain, but it's thought that a China Airlines 747 might have gone supersonic during an emergency descent in 1985. According to the Wikipedia article, "Altitude decreased 10,000 ft (3,000 m) within only twenty seconds." and "They had descended 30,000 ft (9,100 m) in under two and a half minutes".

      Which is again, nothing compared to the potential seconds in which Hyperloop could be repressurized. They wouldn't actually repressurize it that fast - there's no need to and it'd be hard on the tube, craft, and any passengers exposed to the low pressure. But they're effectively unlimited in the potential speed in which they can repressurize the air in the tube - unlike a plane, which has to fly supersonic to be able to repressurize in two and a half minutes.

      Judging from this post of yours, you have some serious misconceptions about the Hyperloop concept and you seriously need to read the design document. Since you don't know about the emergency exists, I expect that there's an awful lot of other things that you think about the concept that don't actually match up to what's being proposed.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    24. Re:Vacuum? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Hyperloop is more the sort of thing you'd use to cross large bays, seas, or oceans, not little channels. But, that adds an additional layer of complexity, so of course early incarnations will be on land.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    25. Re:Vacuum? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Were you sent here by the devil?

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    26. Re:Vacuum? by vix86 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hyperloop's biggest problem will never be engineering. It'll be the concerted efforts of the airline industry, the dated train industry, and the trucking industry; all coming down on any attempt to build a real life version connecting any two cities spanning 100s of miles. Even if the most conservative costs of freighting for the hyperloop were to double (from what I've read in the Hyperloop Org's huge PDF), it'd still be faster and cheaper than all the current means of transportation of goods. Nothing like the Hyperloop would get built easily if it stands to destabilize or even destroy these other industries.

    27. Re:Vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is I can't have a bag of potato chips in six minutes?

    28. Re:Vacuum? by Rei · · Score: 1

      No, good sir, I'm on the level!

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    29. Re:Vacuum? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Hyperloop Is Not A Vatican
      Hyperloop Is Not A Vacation
      Hyperloop Is Not A Vitamin

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    30. Re:Vacuum? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Even if the most conservative costs of freighting for the hyperloop were to double ....... it'd still be faster and cheaper than all the current means of transportation of goods.

      So a railway plus a 4m diameter vacuum tube on pylons will be cheaper than a railway without a 4m diameter vacuum tube on pylons?

    31. Re:Vacuum? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Hyperloop is not a railway. You might as well just compare it to a port on pylons or a mall on pylons if you want bad analogies.

      The closest thing in terms of construction to Hyperloop is an oil pipeline. It has much more difficult approval aspects due to environmental issues and near universal public dislike, and of course corrosion challenges and such; but its geometry tolerances are much lower. So it's still not a perfect match, but it's at least closer than comparing Hyperloop to rail. And the costs per unit distance for oil pipeline in the US for the same diameter as Hyperloop track are indeed comparable to the Hyperloop cost estimates.

      Now, part of the reason for Hyperloop's reduced costs vs. rail - and let's not play this down - are that it does less. It has less total throughput and not as many stops. But it's also much faster and cheaper. Versus air, it's much higher throughput, although not quite as fast (although still much cheaper). It is designed to be a low cost intermediary between rail and air travel.

      By not having as many stops, not only does Hyperloop avoid having to build stations, but it also allows them to stay over cheap, easy right-of-way locations like being elevated over interstate medians rather than having to go into a whole bunch of cities. The other key aspect is loading. Train bridges spend most of their time unloaded, but when a train passes over, they face incredible loading until it's moved across. They have to be built very strong to tolerate this. Hyperloop instead uses frequently launched vehicles that are an order of magnitude ligher than a HSR train. This dramatically reduces track loading and thus support weight.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    32. Re: Vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You answered incorrectly. Now you appear like a buffoon.

    33. Re: Vacuum? by catprog · · Score: 1

      Under the same rules. FedEx is a leach of the national highway system.

      Just because someone provides a service to government they are now no longer private? I didn't think the government was that big.

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
  3. It's a prototype by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had to read fairly far through the article to realize it's just a prototype. It will be about 5 miles long, built in central California, along highway 5.

    The company that's building it worked on tricky projects before, like the LHC. They seem confident in their ability to build it, they said that the hard part is reducing costs and energy usage to acceptable levels.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:It's a prototype by d0ran$ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Replying to undo mod

    2. Re:It's a prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Modding to undo reply ... oops.

    3. Re:It's a prototype by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Replying to undo mod

      To be fair, it was kind of a funny comment. All someone has to do to get +5 is read the article, summarize the relevant points, and suddenly you are the most knowledgeable guy in the room because no one reads the articles.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:It's a prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the Quay Valley planned community is just that, planned. It has not been approved by Kings County and likely never will be approved until the water availability situation due to the drought is solved.

    5. Re:It's a prototype by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it was kind of a funny comment. All someone has to do to get +5 is read the article, summarize the relevant points, and suddenly you are the most knowledgeable guy in the room because no one reads the articles.

      With good reason. Half the time the article is wrong, either in whole or in part, and you have to read six other things too before you really have any understanding of the topic.

      For years, the summary was usually insanely wrong. Diametrically opposed to the linked article. It was bizarre. I'm convinced it was Slashdot editor policy to pick the worst possible article summary submission for the front page in order to drive comments correcting it. So yeah, you had to read the comments to find out what was actually said (because you weren't going to read the article, because it was wrong anyway).

    6. Re:It's a prototype by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      They seem confident in their ability to build it, they said that the hard part is reducing costs and energy usage to acceptable levels.

      Sounds like engineering to me.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. Kind of serious? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, of the two possible viable corridors for this...BoWash, or SF-LA....which one will have the Environmental Impact Study finished first?
    Then which one will be able to navigate the years of cease and desist lawsuits first?

    1. Re:Kind of serious? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "which one will have the Environmental Impact Study finished first?
      Then which one will be able to navigate the years of cease and desist lawsuits first?"

      My prediction: the Beijing-Shanghai corridor.

    2. Re:Kind of serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Trans-continental Hyperloop will be completed in the year 2052 and will span the entire length of New Mexamericanada.

    3. Re:Kind of serious? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      If the Boston-Washington one follows the same path I take to get to Mass from Maryland, it would go down the 95 corridor, to the Jersey Turnpike, through New York, and up 95 again. This travels through several states:

      DC
      Maryland
      Pennsylvania (very short, but there)
      Delaware
      New Jersey
      New York
      Connecticut
      Massachusetts

      I know that DC, MD, NY, and MA are all D states, not sure about the rest, but that many D states will be just as bad as CA.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  5. Re: More Republican corporate welfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that no gov money is going into this. In addition, all of musk ventures makes America stronger, while you, attached to kock bros pants, continue to destroy America.

  6. Re: Never will be built in the USA by WindBourne · · Score: 0

    Yeah, America never develops anything.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  7. I want to ride on one some day by myid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I guess I feel like people felt when the train, car and airplane first came out. The hyperloop (like those earlier inventions) sounds like a wonderful idea, but it's a little dangerous. I want to ride on one eventually, but not on the first few runs. Let them work out any early problems with other, more daring riders.

    1. Re:I want to ride on one some day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they used this new technology for transferring good for first year at least.

    2. Re:I want to ride on one some day by myid · · Score: 1

      Only if they used this new technology for transferring good for first year at least.

      Do you mean Hyperloop Transportation Technologies (HTT) transporting mail, packages, etc. instead of people for at least the first year? That's a good idea! If an HTT train has a problem, I'd rather have packages be in it than people.

      If it's cheap enough, then the USPS, FedEx and UPS might want to use HTT transportation. Not moving companies. I'd hate to have a heavy sofa come loose and punch a hole in a moving HTT train.

    3. Re:I want to ride on one some day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The hyperloop is designed to not pull more than 0.5g, so if your sofa came loose, blame the strut holding it down.

  8. Gives me geek hardon by justcauseisjustthat · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for teleportation prototype to be next or at least hypersonic passenger plane.

    1. Re:Gives me geek hardon by Rei · · Score: 1

      Hyperloop could potentially go at hypersonic plane speeds, if filled with very diffuse hydrogen, or very diffuse hot gas (no, hydrogen is not dangerous nor corrosive at such very low pressures), rather than room temperature air. The speed of sound (the limiting factor) depends on the gas mixture and its temperature. In fact, one kind of expects the gas to be pretty hot on its own from the capsules moving through it - such low pressure gases are poor thermal conductors.

      Of course, the faster you want to go, the more your requirements are for a very straight path.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
  9. Atmospheric railway by danieldids · · Score: 1

    Somehow, the same concept: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... But only the propulsion system is encased in vacuum-like conditions. Very nice idea, embedded safe "devices" for when the system goes down. The hyperloop ideia is not that new, only that now instead of encasing only the propulsion system hyperloop encases the whole vehicle.

    1. Re:Atmospheric railway by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      Methinks you need to actually read about how Hyperloop works - it's not even remotely like an atmospheric railway. Air pressure no more drives Hyperloop than it drives a train going through a tunnel. A key part of the Hyperloop design is about how to avoid pressure buildup. Hyperloop spends most of its time in free coast. Acceleration (and deceleration) is handled by magnetic accelerator segments, like a big coilgun.

      And to head you off: no, it's not a vactrain either. It doesn't roll on rails or float on maglev or anything of that nature - it floats as a ground-effect aircraft, and hence needs some air.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    2. Re:Atmospheric railway by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Encasing the entire vehicle allows higher speeds though reduced air pressure. The downside is safety, you're stuck in a long metal pipe if anything goes wrong.

    3. Re:Atmospheric railway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! I thought it was driven by air pushing the train.

  10. Stupid comment by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    It remains to be seen how this will pan out, but having these two companies sign on makes it more likely than ever that the future of transportation may not be autonomous vehicles or supersonic jets, but capsules flying through vacuum tubes.

    Hyper loops, autonomous vehicles or supersonic jets and supersonic jets have different uses. If I am commuting to work or going camping I am probably not going to use a hyper loop or a supersonic jet. If I am travelling to an island a fair distance away I am probably not going to use a hyper loop or an autonomous vehicle. All three modes of transport will probably be useful in the future.

    1. Re:Stupid comment by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      I always use a supersonic jet to take me to my camping sites!

  11. And on Groundbreaking Day... by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

    They can Hype the HyperLoop with HooperFlies!

    I should get advertising royalties from SlashDice for this post.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:And on Groundbreaking Day... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Have those HooperFlies flying through hoopsnakes, and then you'd really have something

  12. hyperloop could beat normal commute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > f I am commuting to work or going camping I am probably not going to use a hyper loop

    I don't know, an hour commute from LA to SF via hyper loop is less than the time a lot of people spend commuting today, and you don't have to pay attention to the road.

    you don't even need the LA-SF to make it a win.

    Build a 20-30 mile one that terminates near the Google Campus (a lot of other tech companies are close by) and down south of San Jose and you could cut an hour+ off of a LOT of people's commute

    1. Re:hyperloop could beat normal commute by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, an hour commute from LA to SF via hyper loop is less than the time a lot of people spend commuting today, and you don't have to pay attention to the road.

      In fact a big problem with hyperloop as it is planned is that the station would be well outside the city, requiring another form of transportation for the last miles. It may be enough to negate the benefits of going really fast. It is the same problem as with airports.
      IMHO, nothing beats rail for commutes.

    2. Re:hyperloop could beat normal commute by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      IMHO, nothing beats rail for commutes.

      It is easy to beat rail for commutes. Get rid of all the stopping at stations you are not going to. We need rail systems with on/off ramps where your pod can separate from the train and stop at the station while the other people continue on. That would speed up a standard slow speed rail more than all this high speed crap will ever do

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    3. Re:hyperloop could beat normal commute by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      California's high speed rail project is also planned to have the same problem of not going into the cities.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:hyperloop could beat normal commute by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, that sucks...
      A big selling point for high speed train is usually that it gets you right in the middle of the city. This may be helped by making high speed trains compatible with regular railways (although at a reduced speed).
      For example, in France, Marseille-Paris is a bit over 3 hours by high speed train. But because both stations are downtown, it may actually be faster than the plane. Despite a flight time of slightly more than an hour.

      And that's for France. In Japan, the railway system is another order of magnitude better (although expensive), with an extensive network and legendary punctuality. For Tokyo-Osaka, if you have the money (or a JR pass), the Shinkansen is the obvious choice.

  13. Re:More Republican corporate welfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether it's Republicans or Democrats who are to blame for whatever your pet cause might be, all of the money given to Tesla, Solyndra, green energy, whatever is a rounding error on the balance sheet of the defense budget. The USoA has wasted at least $5 TRILLION dollars since the end of the Vietnam War.
    Now try adjusting that for inflation to see an even more shocking number.

    And that's just Defense.

  14. Until an earthquake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That five mile section should work nicely until an earthquake.

    1. Re:Until an earthquake by Captain+Hook · · Score: 2

      The partially evacuated pipe is what makes the entire system perhaps better suited to earthquake zones compared to trains.

      With a train, there is no way of knowing whether both tracks are still intact short of a visual survey over the entire length of the line. Forcing all trains to stop immediately.

      With the hyperloop, any breach of the pipe, will let air into the tube, which increases the atmospheric pressure and forces the pod to slow down. It's a nice passive safety system for everything running in the pipe and is really easy and cheap to monitor centrally because you just need a few pressure sensors dotted along the length of the each pipe section.

      It doesn't tell you where the leak might be if there is a leak, but if you can maintain a low pressure you know the pipe is probably still intact.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    2. Re:Until an earthquake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing that gauge is maintained is challenging but basic integrity of the rails can be verified by electricity running through the rails and other means used from a central location. Much rail is now continuous rather than the old clackety clack of multiple sections. I suspect there is little difference between now and Hype as distortion of the tube in an earthquake would not be any simpler to detect than distorted rail. Harder to correct with the Hype most likely.

    3. Re:Until an earthquake by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      With the hyperloop, any breach of the pipe, will let air into the tube, which increases the atmospheric pressure and forces the pod to slow down. It's a nice passive safety system

      Understatement of the day. The air rushing into the broken pipe will hit any 1000kph train within it like a gigantic sledge hammer. It will still hit the train like a sledgehammer if the train has already been stopped because of an advance warning.

      There are plenty of ways of stopping all conventional trains (and Hyperloop trains for that matter, but refer to my first paragraph) if an earthquake is detected anywhere along the line. Japan has such systems. Of course, if the track/pipe is broken at a place when the train is passing through, neither is safe.

  15. Re: Never will be built in the USA by sir1real · · Score: 0

    Not with the Republicans in charge.

  16. Here's hoping they detect the firmament as well! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

    NASA can't have all the (hidden) glory!

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  17. Re: More Republican corporate welfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes -- but *terrorists* don't discriminate between D babies and R babies. Or wives. More money to the TSA to protect us, and more money to big oil to free us!

  18. How about answering the question? by westlake · · Score: 0

    So what happens when the capsule springs a leak and you cannot bre . .a..

    I think it is long past time someone addressed the problem of evacuation seriously.

    The passenger mask aboard an aircraft has a ten minute supply of oxygen. The Time of Useful Consciousness (TUC) in a near-vacuum is measured in seconds. Oxygen Use in Aviation

    Death comes quickly.

    As originally conceived, a Hyperloop capsule would pack in 28 people in a space about four feet wide and four feet tall. Beyond the hype of Hyperloop: An analysis of Elon Musk's proposed transit system

    It would be difficult to imagine a space more claustrophobic and an invitation to panic and offering less room for maneuver this side of the Hunley .

  19. Re: More Republican corporate welfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Musk has so far received more than 5 billion in government money. His 'ventures' without the government money and know-how produced nothing. Tesla made their fist car after they got a DoE loan, SpaceX started to build rockets after the Nasa contracts and so on. Musk is, basically, a very successful con artist. When he loses a bit more of his hair he'll be just like your favorite presidential candidate.

  20. Where are they playing? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Hyperloop Getting Closer To Reality, Groundbreaking Set For 2016

    Sounds like a Canadian Indie band who are taking things in a new direction next year.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  21. Does nobody remember the SpaceX incident? by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 0

    Kind of surprised because of not seeing a single comment mentioning the recent SpaceX accident (+ delay in finding the problems + not too convincing problem reports). Not implying that Elon's companies are likely to deliver faulty technology, but that building extremely complex (transportation) systems is so difficult that cannot be mastered even after years of experience.

    Hyperloop involves lots of never-tested-before features and is addressed to normal people (not to trained astronauts, perfectly aware of the risks). According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperloop), it is expected to have an average speed of 962 km/h (and a top one of 1220 km/h), like a plane at the ground level! And it would run across (densely) populated areas! What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    1. Re:Does nobody remember the SpaceX incident? by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      Additionally, are we sure that Elon Musk hasn't try this kind of things before? Are we sure that he is not related to Lyle Lanley? Because their speeches seem quite similar
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  22. Horseshit by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    "If the cabin air leaks out of a plane at 13,000m, you'll be dead in 6 minutes."

    Err , no. Some people will be dead in 6 minutes. Others won't as plenty of stowaways who survived in the non pressurised wheel compartments of passenger jets have shown.

    "and the air leaked out of your spaceship, you'd be dead in six minutes"

    Depends how fast. If it was more or less instantanious you'd be dead in seconds from your lungs imploding and other massive internal organ damage and internal bleeding.

    1. Re:Horseshit by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Depends how fast. If it was more or less instantanious you'd be dead in seconds from your lungs imploding and other massive internal organ damage and internal bleeding.

      Only if you tried to hold your breath, apparently.

      http://www.geoffreylandis.com/...

      Humans hae survived vacuum exposure and lived to tell the tale.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Horseshit by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      you'd be dead in seconds from your lungs imploding

      I think you have that backwards. Imploding would be if the vacuum was in the lungs. Exploding happens when there is air in the lung and it is exposed to vacuum. As the other poster mentioned though, it depends. If you exhale the whole time, you might actually be undamaged.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:Horseshit by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the air comes out of your lungs whether you like it or not leaving a vacuum pretty quickly and the pressure of the surrounding tissue then collapses them.

    4. Re:Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      13,000m is over 42,000 feet. 42,000 is near the ceiling of commercial airline travel. Most flights stay well under 40,000, usually 30-36k feet.

      I seriously doubt there are any stowaway survivor stories where the plane flew at over 40,000 feet. Science suggests it's very unlikely, but also it's just plain rare to fly that high. Anyhow, for every few stowaway-survivor incidents there's a ghost-plane incident--cabin loses air pressure, pilot loses consciousness before descending to lower altitude, everybody suffocates, and the plane travels on autopilot until it runs out of fuel. This has happened at lower altitudes than 42,000 feet.

  23. Do you not remember 9/11? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperloop), it is expected to have an average speed of 962 km/h (and a top one of 1220 km/h), like a plane at the ground level! And it would run across (densely) populated areas! What could possibly go wrong?

    Compare that to a jet plane, and then STFU, FUD troll.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Do you not remember 9/11? by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      Compare that to a jet plane, and then STFU, FUD troll.

      Highlighting a reality which you don't like is being a troll?!

      What has 9/11 to do with all this? If a plane has a TECHNICAL problem, all the passengers might die, but most likely nobody else as far as might happen in a remote area (ocean). Additionally, planes have been tested for almost 100 years (and there are still accidents; quite a few of them during the last years) and run on a no-obstacle area (open air).

      Is it so difficult to see that reaching plane-like speeds at the ground level is likely to provoke many more problems? We are talking about 50% faster than the fastest train ever (around 600 km/h)! By bearing in mind that the usual speed for high-speed trains is in the 300 km/h range!

      A never-tested-before technology aims to be notably faster than the fastest ground transportation ever built and you don't see any problem with that? It is weird because you seem a pretty sensible person.

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    2. Re:Do you not remember 9/11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointing out that a worse disaster is possible and then concluding that this new thing that could cause potential disaster is therefore ok doesn't make sense. It would be like criticizing someone for talking about the dangers of high explosives because there are atomic bombs. Do you not remember Hiroshima? And, uh, STFU, FUD troll.

    3. Re:Do you not remember 9/11? by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      OK. All this makes even more sense (-> I should have chosen this alternative the first time, rather than wasting my time answering someone like you).

      PS: I have heard something about you (I am new here; in fact this has been my first modded-down comment), Elon fans, and the legends seem to be true. Although what I don’t understand is why you didn't modded down my other comment too. It basically implies that this whole thing is a scam proposed by a liar (too subtle perhaps?).

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  24. Hyperloop is better for freight by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    The benefit of freight is that there's far less danger and far lower insurance liability. Hyperloop could pull trucks off the roads, from Seattle to San Diego and from NYC to Boston. Think of the greenhouse gases we'll save.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    1. Re:Hyperloop is better for freight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The benefit of freight is that there's far less danger and far lower insurance liability. Hyperloop could pull trucks off the roads, from Seattle to San Diego and from NYC to Boston. Think of the greenhouse gases we'll save.

      I thought we were trying to eliminate greenhouse gasses, and now you want to save them? We should have known this saving things was a slippery slope that would get out of hand. It was all fine and good when we were saving the whales. But then we started saving bees, and now we're saving greenhouse gasses. Where will it end? Must we save the serial killers and radioactive waste too?

    2. Re:Hyperloop is better for freight by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      The benefit of freight is that there's far less danger and far lower insurance liability. Hyperloop could pull trucks off the roads .... Think of the greenhouse gases we'll save.

      Then they need to build it big enough to take standard freight containers.

      Most freight does not need to be moved at high speed. Conventional rail can already do that with far less greehouse gas than road transport.

  25. Re: Never will be built in the USA by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    That would have worked just as well the other direction, that might be a clue to you that you are a partisan moron.

    Not with the Democrats in charge.

    You will notice that when Obama had the white house, and the Democrats had both houses of congress, nothing much got done either.

    In fact, it took them losing the house before even passing the ACA, which they did after the voters had already spoken on what they wanted.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  26. Mars air is about 1% Earth by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Enough that parachutes work to a certain degree and are used fro probe landings.
    Enough that you have to some sort of heat-sheilding on probe entry.
    Not enough to breath. Almost all carbon dioxide anyways.
    Not enough to block solar radiation. Astronauts would fry in a large solar storm.

  27. Simple solution(s) by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    Being at near ground level gives some options an aircraft doesn't have.

    Plenty of air is centimeters away. The only trick is to get to it. Assuming the capsule is intact, and can come to a rest in the 10 minutes emergency air lasts, you just need a way to open a hole to the outside. Just pump all the air you need until rescue arrives.

    If cabin pressure is normal, the easiest would be to have a hollow lance pierce the tube. It would take some work to jab though ~1cm of steel. Might as well use a pair of carbide tip lances (with side holes) jabbing at opposite sides of the tube fr counterpressure. An overcenter system (like a car scissor jack when fully extended) can apply massive force. Pop, pop, you have air in and air out.

    If the cabin breached, the entire tube needs to be filled. Time to get out something with high energy. A cutting device (friction wheel, cutting torch, etc) can get the job done, but slowly. Faster and more compact would be some thermite charges. Toss 'em fore and aft. Crude, but effective. Shape charge if you are crazy enough.

    Or if you want really fast, and independent of the capsule, put vents on the tube. They can be as simple as butterfly valves or as dramatic as explosive bolt hatches. Butterfly valves have the advantage of using inrushing air to slow or move a capsule. Hatches give a way for people to get in and out of tubes for emergencies or maintenance.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  28. Re: Never will be built in the USA by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    actually, during the first 2 years, O and the dems brought back America's economy and kept us from moving into a depression worse than the Great Depression.
    In addition, ACA was done during the first 2 years of O time which is when they had control of CONgress and ACA was considered halfway decent solution. Even now, less than 1/3 want ACA gone (and that is pretty much the GOP), 2/3 want it tweaked or to move to single payer system.

    However, I would argue that the dems really have not done anything innovative.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  29. Re: Never will be built in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mostly because of a little thing called a filibuster and the fact that the Republicans decided, on the night of Obama's inauguration to block him at every turn.

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/...

    And don't try to play the "supermajority" card before reading the following

    http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-ma...

  30. Beware Of The Hyper Cube!! by unclefred · · Score: 1

    I don't mind the Hyperloop as long as they don't make that spooky HYPER CUBE!!!!!!!