Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Retrofits Vintage Legacy Vehicles With Smart Features

An anonymous reader writes: Verizon have released an after-market system called Hum that can bring 'smart' features to 150 million existing cars of various vintages going as far back as 1999. The system consists of an on-board diagnostic (OBD) reader plugged into the vehicle's OBD port and a Bluetooth-enabled device clipped to the visor. It's the presence of the ODB port that limits the maximum age of the car to 1996. Hum comes with an app, and enables features such as automatic accident reporting, roadside assistance services and the tracking of stolen cars. The service will cost $14.99 per month via subscription.

87 comments

  1. Just what I need for an old car! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another monthly payment on top of everything else. Thanks, Verizon!

    1. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another monthly payment on top of everything else. Thanks, Verizon!

      Don't worry. You'll feel better when it's not Verizon offering you an optional monitoring service for a small monthly fee.

      Soon it will be your auto insurance provider demanding you install this standard monitoring service that comes with your new insurance policy.

      Of course, they'll sell this concept under the guise of making everyone safer and thus lowering insurance claims. Odd part is somehow this will cost you the consumer more in the end.

    2. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by drdanny_orig · · Score: 1

      To say nothing about the ridiculous price. Especially for a service that's unlikely to be used in any given month. F'em all.

      --
      .nosig
    3. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by kheldan · · Score: 2

      Just what older cars need: An add-on exploitable wireless security hole that you pay fifteen bucks a month for. Thanks, Verizon!

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    4. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by ScentCone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To say nothing about the ridiculous price. Especially for a service that's unlikely to be used in any given month. F'em all.

      If it's not working all the time, it's not working. That's the whole point of these systems. A lot of what it offers (like, knowing where your 85 year old grandpa's car is when he's late coming back from golfing and not answering his phone) isn't useful if it's only online and using its SIM card and burning some bandwidth when the driver decides just that moment to turn it on. If $15 bucks for a mobile device's connectivity and use of their services is too much for you, just don't buy it. There are plenty of people who would like some OnStar-type services on a vehicle that wasn't factory equipped for it, and the cost of two sandwiches a month is simply no big deal.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already tried with me. 5% off? No thanks State Farm. Go spy on your other customers.

    6. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so you want to track grandpa?

      That's an additional $10 fee per month with Verizon.
      Now your $15 monthly fee is $25 – and that's before the Local, State, and Federal Government taxes, fees, etc.

      Did you even graduate high school?

    7. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by rch7 · · Score: 1

      They already tried with me. 5% off? No thanks State Farm. Go spy on your other customers.

      Progressive was more generous for me - 30% off for Big Brother device. The only issue that price with 30% off was still about the same as competitor offer without device.

    8. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Just what older cars need: An add-on exploitable wireless security hole that you pay fifteen bucks a month for. Thanks, Verizon!

      Look, you can't have a Panopticon if you can't monitor everybody.

      Why do you hate America?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by kheldan · · Score: 1

      How can I hate America when I can't even define what it is, because everything I ever thought it was was a complete and total LIE?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    10. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Hopefully this is not continuously tracking your car and sending details of every minute of your travel to Verizon.
      If you want to know where grandpa is, it could just send a message to the car and retrieve the position.
      If there is a fault code or an accident, it could just send a message.
      The data use requirements for this should be minuscule (and so should the price).
      It seems targeted at clueless technophobes who are willing to pay for (false) security.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    11. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. You'll feel better when it's not Verizon offering you an optional monitoring service for a small monthly fee.

      It will look like nothing compared to your Self-Driving Car Cloud Support fee of $0.30 per mile driven.

    12. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nothing makes an old car feel like a new car again quite like a monthly payment.

    13. Re:Just what I need for an old car! by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      "Soon it will be your auto insurance provider demanding you install this"

      Doubtful. New cars will already come with it. Old ones usually get state minimun insurance where the service wouldn't really benefit the inusrance company anyway.

  2. Vintage, eh? by ickleberry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought a car would have to be 25 or 30 year old to be called vintage, and only a Subaru could be called Legacy. I suppose ye Americans are living in a faster-paced consumerist throw-away society. If it's not this year's model it's considered old.

    1. Re:Vintage, eh? by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thinking the same thing here... I don't consider anything made after 1980 to be "vintage".

      Stupid headline had me thinking how they managed to stuff all of this into a 1963 Chevy II Nova SuperSport...

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Vintage, eh? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I was told that PCs from 1999 were "antique", so go figure! I could have replied that they were i686 + PAE, but I sadly know better than to do that when unwarranted.

    3. Re:Vintage, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought a car would have to be 25 or 30 year old to be called vintage, and only a Subaru could be called Legacy. I suppose ye Americans are living in a faster-paced consumerist throw-away society. If it's not this year's model it's considered old.

      Not quite vintage, but close. Cars from 1990 (25 years) and before can get HISTORICAL plates now... so closer to historical than current

    4. Re:Vintage, eh? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Everything is vintage when you're abusing the word to refer to things unrelated to wine.

    5. Re:Vintage, eh? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      "Vintage" is good. "Legacy" is bad. They want you to think of your old car as "Legacy" so you'll want to upgrade it.

    6. Re:Vintage, eh? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I suppose ye Americans are living in a faster-paced consumerist throw-away society. If it's not this year's model it's considered old.

      Turn of phrase. The average car age, not even it's lifespan, is 11.4 years now. There's actually a LOT of 20+ year old cars on the roads.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    7. Re:Vintage, eh? by narcc · · Score: 1

      That's hard to imagine. Either I'm old, or that's really stupid.

    8. Re:Vintage, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid headline had me thinking how they managed to stuff all of this into a 1963 Chevy II Nova SuperSport...

      Same, I was already warming to the idea of saying "Ok Chevy, take me to the store"

    9. Re:Vintage, eh? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      You're old. Historical plates are for car older than x-years old. At some point 2015 cars will be historical. Unless you want historical to mean 'of historical significance' but then you would have government officials deciding that list each year instead of spending time on important things.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  3. Just what I need.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More monthly fees...

  4. That Verizon? by MiniMike · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hopefully they didn't use the code from their tech dispatch system- I don't want my car to give me a two hour window for a drive to the corner store, and then miss it anyway.

  5. So now even old cars can be hacked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope nobody retrofits bicycles... Otherwise everything is lost!

  6. Ask this: Will you accept liability? by ameline · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will they accept liability for any damages caused as a consequence of commands on the CAN bus originating from or passing through their device? If yes, put it in writing. If no, it's not getting on the CAN bus of my vehicle.

    --
    Ian Ameline
    1. Re:Ask this: Will you accept liability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they accept liability for any damages caused as a consequence of commands on the CAN bus originating from or passing through their device? If yes, put it in writing. If no, it's not getting on the CAN bus of my vehicle.

      Why should they, it plugs into the ODB port, not the CAN bus. It says ODB three times in the summary!

    2. Re: Ask this: Will you accept liability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Want to see something creepy?

      Sort the letters:
      CAN -> ACN
      OBD -> BDO

      CAN is one less than OBD! #illuminati

    3. Re:Ask this: Will you accept liability? by ameline · · Score: 2

      The can bus is directly exposed on the pins of the OBD2 port.

      --
      Ian Ameline
    4. Re:Ask this: Will you accept liability? by psm321 · · Score: 1

      The best part is, his own link says that multiple times...

    5. Re: Ask this: Will you accept liability? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's more stunning. The fact that what you said is true or the fact that you noticed such a thing.

  7. Vintage? by rossdee · · Score: 4, Informative

    "as far back as 1999"

    Thats not vintage

    A vintage car is one made between 1919 and 1930.
    1918 and earlier then its a veteran
    1931 to WWII and its post-vintage

    Vehicles made in the latter half of the twentieth century may be considered 'classic' but certainly not vintage.

    1. Re:Vintage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vintage is anything made before the year 2000, grandpa

    2. Re:Vintage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Thank you for saying that. Worst. Headline. Ever.

    3. Re:Vintage? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      No, vintage is anything made before the year 2005.

      Stupid teenagers.

      Signed,
      a little kid.

    4. Re:Vintage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Source? Royal Auto Club? or did you just pull this out of your ass?

  8. Two possibly useful features and one useless one by srmalloy · · Score: 2

    The accident reporting and roadside assistance features could be useful. As soon as these become readily available, though, one of the first things that a car thief would do is pull the dongle out of the OBD II port and throw it and the visor widget out the window, making it impossible to track the car. As a built in module, it works, because it's difficult for a thief to remove, but if it can be removed in 30 seconds without tools, it's worthless for tracking a stolen car.

  9. Not exactly novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... this performs the same functions as the Automatic dongle, which has a one-time cost of $100, does not have a recurring monthly fee, requires no association with Verizon, and doesn't require something to be clipped to your visor? Pass.

    1. Re:Not exactly novel by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You got robbed. $12.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Not exactly novel by mlts · · Score: 2

      Or a Scangauge 2, which also plugs into the OBD II port, can be placed anywhere where its contents can be useful.

      Of course, a generic Bluetooth OBD tool for $10 from Amazon + Torque is another solution.

      As the above, none of the above require a constant connection, no cellular device, no monthly fees, and you can place it where you want.

      Companies wanting to attach stuff to your ODB2 port for data mining is getting old. From insurance dongles which will ding you if you stomp hard on the brakes or have a long commute, to governments that want the data for real time odometer readings for "taxes".

    3. Re:Not exactly novel by sentiblue · · Score: 1

      I bought the Automatic dongle too... works like a charm. With my iPhone clipped to the front panel of the car, it all looks and works like a modern smart vehicle.

  10. Great, now old cars can get hacked too! by gweihir · · Score: 2

    I had a feeling those with cars that hackers could not take over at will may have felt left out. Ain't technology great?

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Great, now old cars can get hacked too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us enjoy being able to hack our cars.

  11. Or you could... by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ....buy a Torque (that's an Android app) compatible bluetooth ODB reader for around $20 with no recurring costs.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Or you could... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's several carputers running linux that have OBD2, wifi, and 3G data. i know there is a raspberry pi DIY guide if you're on a budget.

    2. Re:Or you could... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      But then you have to think about what the codes mean. You don't have a 'certified mechanic' to interpret things for you.

      The horror.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Or you could... by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      That's true, I was just proposing the solution I had personal experience with. The point is, none of these solutions require a monthly fee.

      This is similar in my view to Comcast or whatever they're calling themselves these days trying to sign people up for a security system at an inflated price monthly price that continues ad infinitum, when you can *buy* the equipment and incur no recurring cost for less than a year's cost of the service.

      Cable companies still seem to be locked into the business plan of "providing a service" for a stiff monthly fee for essentially doing very little besides keeping the lights on and maintaining the billing service. That really doesn't work anymore.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  12. um, no thanks by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    Hum that canÂbring 'smart' features to 150 million existing carsÂof various vintages going as far back as 1999

    With all of the potential for malicious hacks in modern cars with "smart features", why would I want to introduce an attack vector into a car that's relatively secure? And pay fifteen bucks a month for it?

  13. Buy and Automatic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, Automatic is a bit pricey for the dongle.. but you don't pay any reoccurring fees for it. And I get all of that stuff Verizon is selling - with no additional charges.

  14. ELM327 + Torque Pro app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can buy a cheap ELM327 module that plugs into your OBD2 port. It can connect to your Android over Bluetooth, and then run the Torque Pro app. Very cheap, and a one time price, and gives you a lot of functionality that Verizon wants to gouge you for. It may not have some of the extra frills. But with these devices internet connected, what could possibly go wrong? Didn't somebody just demonstrate a hack of internet connected Jeeps?

    1. Re:ELM327 + Torque Pro app by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But with these devices internet connected, what could possibly go wrong?

      Well for one thing, what's the security like on an el cheapo ELM327 dongle?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. I drive an older car because it ISN'T smart by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a 10 year old Honda Civic, base model, power nothing. I really am not looking forward to buying a new car as it seems they all have some Smart (TM) enabled tracking computerized bullshit that does nothing to enhance driving safety or performance, it just adds more shiny stuff to the sticker price.

    I need a reliable set of wheels. Period. It has been my experience that adding computers to things does not make my life any simpler or easier, it simply adds a new layer of headaches.

    Please, everyone, fuck off with the IoT shill - some of us don't want it or need it.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:I drive an older car because it ISN'T smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No power steering or power brakes? That must be hard to drive!

    2. Re: I drive an older car because it ISN'T smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot "and get iff my lawn!"

    3. Re:I drive an older car because it ISN'T smart by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Yep, this. My 2002 truck is more pleasant to drive in a lot of ways than my 2011 commuter car.

      - No "I Agree" button on the touchscreen sever single time I start it up.
      - AC controls that are a couple simple knobs, not monstrous buttons that get reset to outside air and AC every time I cycle through the defrost setting to get back to front vents.
      - No XM selection I have to cycle through to get from my iPod back to FM.
      - No downloaded messages about how my carbon footprint is doing for the last month that start playing 30s into my drive (very distracting to turn off via the stupid touchscreen).

      Why manufacturers (and consumers) think we need all this touchscreen, and now internet connected crap is beyond me. I just want to get from home to work and back.

    4. Re: I drive an older car because it ISN'T smart by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

      You forgot "and get iff my lawn!"

      You're not on my lawn because my older car is on my lawn, on blocks.

      Now get off my car!

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    5. Re:I drive an older car because it ISN'T smart by losfromla · · Score: 1

      10 year old Honda Civic weighs next to nothing and if engineered for no PS or PBs, it would then likely be easy enough to drive for most drivers. That said, this car probably has PBs as most even base model cars and trucks do.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    6. Re:I drive an older car because it ISN'T smart by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      I have driven vehicles without power steering. I haven't (to my knowledge) driven one without power brakes. Power steering doesn't really add much at all. In fact it seems like a waste to me. If you are rolling more than about 2mph, manual steering works just fine. You still get a mechanical advantage (the steering wheel turns a further distance than the wheels pivot). It's neigh impossible to turn the wheel at a dead stop. People who learned to drive before power steering will instinctively plan their trajectories so that they can get rolling before turning the wheel.

    7. Re:I drive an older car because it ISN'T smart by guruevi · · Score: 1

      I don't know of (m)any cars that have active, continuous tracking (maybe Tesla's?) but you're also missing out on a great deal of safety features. Crashing a 10 yo car vs a current car will differ greatly in survivability. Not that a 10yo car is 'old' or in any way needs to be replaced but avoiding safety features on purpose seems idiotic.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    8. Re:I drive an older car because it ISN'T smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call Bullshit. The US version of the 2005 Honda Civic DX came with speed sensitive hydraulic power assist rack and pinion steering. So, you have power steering. Honda Civics sold in the US since the early 1990's have had hydraulic power boosters for the brakes, as well. Maybe they had an even more stripped down version sold where you are, but I'm skeptical.

      If you want to bitch about Infotainment systems, fine, but as an Irate Engineer, you ought to be a little bit more precise in your language. You want a computer controlling your engine. You just don't want to know about it.

      TLDR: Computers make cars perform better and last longer.
      I had a 1996 Civic DX, 1989 Diahatsu Charade, 1966 Dodge A100 van (Chrysler 225 slant 6) and a 1959 MG A Trust me, there's a HUGE difference in how they perform and how easy they are to maintain for the same number of miles. I bet you wish you had a manual choke as well, right? Do you regret having vacuum advance on your timing? I've known some drivers of older cars who bitch about having synchro mesh first gears, too. Cars from the 1960's and before, without computers and stuff like that, are for people who like to work on cars. MG's, they say, make mechanics out of ordinary men. A Honda from 2005 should go easily 5X further with far less maintenance as any car from the 1950's, plus they're more efficient, more powerful and pollute less. My boss had a BMW 2002 ti I don't know what year, precisely. Every time he drove from the valley into the mountains, he had to pull over at the same turnout to adjust his fuel injection system - he actually met another 2002 ti driver in the same turnout doing the same thing on one trip. My grandpa, who never owned a car manufactured after 1969, believed that you should dump a car at 50k miles because after that it was quickly going to degrade into a massive liability - they're nothing but trouble. I remember my family celebrating 100,000 miles on a car because it was a freakish event - and that was after routine "ring and valve jobs" as well as much routine servicing. My Civic - never had any of that. It could be the elimination of lead from gas (which dramatically improved the lifespan of engines) or it could be the constant monitoring of oxygen and temperature on the intake, and the products of combustion on the exhaust, and automatic minor tweaking of the fuel injection and ignition to keep the car healthy. But people don't really need to rebuild engines these days to get 250k miles out of them. They just work.

      Let's not get started on smog pumps. We shall not mention that period.
      .

      http://www.cars.com/honda/civic/2005/specifications/?acode=USB50HOC021A0
      http://www.autopartswarehouse.com/shop_parts/brake_booster/honda/civic.html

    9. Re:I drive an older car because it ISN'T smart by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      No power steering or power brakes? That must be hard to drive!

      Many cars had Vacuum-powered break assist, which many drivers did not know about. They were often not consider to be "powered", since they were not hydraulic-assisted like the power steering.
      And since this thread is about computer controls, they might qualify anyway, as non-computer-controlled. Certainly they were more reliable than the computer controlled breaks in the Toyota, that was subject of a court case last year.

  16. So your old car can get hacked too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So hackers will be able to cut YOUR brakes just like on the new cars!

  17. Re:Two possibly useful features and one useless on by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The accident reporting and roadside assistance features could be useful. As soon as these become readily available, though, one of the first things that a car thief would do is pull the dongle out of the OBD II port and throw it and the visor widget out the window, making it impossible to track the car. As a built in module, it works, because it's difficult for a thief to remove, but if it can be removed in 30 seconds without tools, it's worthless for tracking a stolen car.

    Thing is, accident reporting and roadside assistance features can be had with any cell phone. And also some aftermarket in-dash radio/gps units.

    Having these features as an add-on to the car would be convenient, if not for the monthly cost. It seems like Verizon is really reaching here.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  18. Re:Two possibly useful features and one useless on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As a built in module, it works, because it's difficult for a thief to remove"

    Really?

    Just disconnect/disable/destroy the antenna. The YouTube video is easily watched on the thief's smartphone.
    Oh, the wonders of the InterWebs!

  19. 2 sandwiches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of us can get about 2 loaves of bread worth of sandwiches out of $15. That' my lunch budget for a pay period ... with toppings.

    1. Re:2 sandwiches? by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Where in China are you writing from?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
  20. The future is now! by tehlinux · · Score: 1

    That's so cutting edge, what's next, something that will fit in my pocket?!

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
  21. Soon to be required on every vehicle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for calculation of road maintenance taxes by every jurisdiction, since fuel taxation is bypassed at the socket.

  22. Also known as: by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    "How to ruin cars that don't come with this crap."

  23. Well that's one of the worst summaries I can REM by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Verizon have released an after-market system called Hum that can bring 'smart' features to 150 million existing cars of various vintages going as far back as 1999.

    1996. Maybe a couple of 1995s.

    The system consists of an on-board diagnostic (OBD) reader plugged into the vehicle's OBD port

    OBD-II, actually.

    and a Bluetooth-enabled device clipped to the visor. It's the presence of the ODB port

    That's On-Board Diagnostics, not Ol' Dirty Bastard. And also, OBD-II.

    that limits the maximum age of the car to 1996.

    That's why it's OBD-II. Because cars before 1996 had a variety of interfaces, some of which went away and some of which just got folded into OBD-II. We now call these "OBD-I" collectively, although they actually have broad variety.

    Hum comes with an app, and enables features such as automatic accident reporting, roadside assistance services and the tracking of stolen cars. The service will cost $14.99 per month via subscription.

    So, it's like Onstar, which wasn't mentioned here why? Seems kind of obvious.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. You know I wasn't thinking? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Maintenance, fuel, registration and insurance aren't expensive enough. I need another recurring fee and some privacy invasion. I'm sold if it's compatible with my Zune though.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  25. Re: samzenpus makes clicks for Dice by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

    Also, Dice eats balls. CTRL+F vint - no matches.

    I can't tell if samzenpus is the idiot, or submitter, but either way someone needs to die in a fire. Fires are deadly, but slow. And well deserved.

  26. Convince the customer to pay for monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Company tracking millions of customers via GPS and being paid to do so by both the customer and intelligence agencies, devises new 'scheme' to extract more location information from the masses and boost the bottom line. Safety first guys! Another brilliant move.

  27. I already have an odb2 reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have an ODB2 reader in the car (always attached). It provides live readouts of the engine computer, engine RPM, temperature, current (instant) fuel consumption, fuel consumed (tank), plus I can real all diagnostic codes, reset the check engine light, read the in-air temperature (usually about 10 degrees warmer than the outside air temperature), plus a whack of other stuff. And I don't need to spend 14.99 per month.

  28. My car is too old. Thank goodness. by djbckr · · Score: 1

    My Jeep is from 1988. It can't be fitted with this, and that makes me happy. I specifically bought it for this very reason. It's a simple machine and easy to fix. Parts are easily found and cheap.

  29. Please Verizon! Now give us window cranks! by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    Please Verizon... give us window cranks! Maybe... you could find a way to inject mesenchymal stem or progenitor cells directly into the vehicle's OBD port that would circulate in the wiring harness until they find and attach to the window crank receptor ligands, which still reside in the motor body driving the worm or ratchet gear in door panels. The cells would begin to grow knob complexes in door panels, culminating in functional window cranks that can manually turn cranking motors, with a simple clutch that disengages during electric operation.

    The primordial coding of the crank gene remains, though in cars young enough to have OBD ports excessive use of factory hormones has triggered aberrant malignant growth of 'power window' motors and associated electric musculature. The design is not nature's own and seems to be comprised of shoddy outgrowths of crap metal and plastic. The lack of a crank is most noted in Winter as windows stick slightly but enough to overwhelm the shit fuck mechanism and render them inoperative. This evolution could have occurred naturally without supplanting the crank, which allows direct human strength (and finesse) to be used to unstick and operate windows... under ALL conditions... and should have by all rights. But bad choices in selective breeding at factory farms and also a drop in average consumer IQ has manifested these undesirable characteristics into the domestic automobile genome.

    Please Verizon, give us top battery terminals! Another correctable factory farm genetic 'defect' are the little tits that have grown on the sides of batteries. These began as novelty traits prized by deviant automotive breeders, but the natural robust lead posts on the top of batteries were bred out of the line to enhance plumpness of maintenance and pure fucking grief. Where there had once been massive same-metal clamp-bonds attached to copper wires with sealed solder slug or factory crimp junctions on top, now there are these side terminals with pitted metal discs secured by sorry-ass monkey-fuck bolts that cannot endure serious tightening, whose heads round out, and provide no reliable purchase for jumper cables. Or do so in a way that ensures a shower of sparks and mayhem.

    By introducing Testosterone into OBC ports it may be possible to re-grow top battery terminals again in time for rutting season. As for most mammals the side tits in batteries may retain some vestigial function but would shrink once the top terminals were again in constant use. Elevated Testosterone may also provide other improvements to automotive function yet to be discovered.

    And finally Verizon, please help the automotive industry eliminate the 'fob'. I am not certain what these are. They seem to have something to do with keys, though I have always used keys to open my cars without fanfare or 'fob'. Fob is such a despicable word, a silly word. I have seen grown men tear up the moment they are compelled to say it. Out of respect for human dignity, the fob must go.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  30. "presence of the ODB port" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So my hooptie can hook up with the Wu Tang clan?

  31. Or you can by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Just buy an OBD-II reader and then watch the zillion youtube mechanics explain what the codes mean and how to fix it.

    The OBD-II reader can be found for about $20 on lots of sites. You don't need the Snap-On readers that cost $1,000 or more. And you definitely don't need to pay Verizon an additional $14.99 a month in addition for what you're shelling out for Verizon mobile service too.

  32. Unecessary by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    Meh.. it's just another telecom offering for a monthly fee what any good maker could provide themselves.

    You just need a Raspi set up as a car computer with ODBC reader. Add a GSM modem for those emergency calling features. I suppose you could use that for tracking too. Better yet though.. get a ham license and track the car via APRS. It's free! Saves minutes on your sim card.

    Total price if you are a good scrounger.. less than a years worth of Verizon's service. After that it's basically free so long as you aren't using you aren't actually making calls and your prepaid SIM card doesn't expire. You can even transfer it all to your next car.

  33. Lol what smart features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to Amazon.
    They sell odb2 blue tooth readers starting at 8$.
    Works with smart phones.
    Does hundreds of things.
    Not just these three.
    No subscription fees.
    Tons of choices for software.

  34. Re:Well that's one of the worst summaries I can RE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the worst summaries you can remark?

    /confused

  35. Re:Verizon is for cows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I missed you