Slashdot Mirror


How To Keep Microsoft's Nose Out of Your Personal Data In Windows 10

MojoKid writes: Amid the privacy concerns and arguably invasive nature of Microsoft's Windows 10 regarding user information, it's no surprise that details on how to minimize leaks as much as possible are often requested by users who have recently made the jump to the new operating system. If you are using Windows 10, or plan to upgrade soon, it's worth bearing in mind a number of privacy-related options that are available, even during the installation/upgrade. If you are already running the OS and forgot to turn them off during installation (or didn't even see them), they can be accessed via the Settings menu on the start menu, and then selecting Privacy from the pop-up menu. Among these menus are a plethora of options regarding what data can be gathered about you. It's worth noting, however, that changing any of these options may disable various OS related services, namely Cortana, as Microsoft's digital assistant has it tendrils buried deep.

18 of 426 comments (clear)

  1. Ok i'm going to say it by ozduo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    don't install the damm thing!

    --
    I got to the chocolate box before you, that's why the hard ones have teeth marks.
  2. How To Keep Microsoft's Nose Out of Your Data? by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just install Linux.

    You're welcome.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  3. Beside the point by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, I can see the options during the setup. Years of updating Java have trained me to uncheck everything.
    Anyway that is old news.

    We want to know more about the things you can not set in the options.
    Ways to prevent forced updates?
    Remove hidden services?

  4. Re:HOSTS file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You joke, but that pretty much IS the only way. Tons of experiments and wire captures have already shown that no matter what settings you disable, the OS still sends TONS of info back to MS servers.

  5. Re:/facepalm by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It actually is that big a deal. It is just that the MS PR department managed to convince some clueless people that what they do is harmless. It is not.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  6. Re:HOSTS file by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is criminal energy involved in sabotaging mechanisms such as the hosts-file in order to deceive users. Even thinking of it requires significant criminal energy, and the strong intent to harm users.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  7. Re:HOSTS file by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Use a modern OS instead of Windows.

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  8. Re:HOSTS file by plasm4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah I have to agree with you there. Going out of your way to hide something from someone is different simply not mentioning it.

  9. Re:HOSTS file by gweilo8888 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nope. The only realistic way is not to install it -- and you're a moron if you do.

  10. Re:HOSTS file by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Until the OS ignores your HOSTS file for some hard-coded domains. If you can't trust your OS, why are you trusting it to filter things out? The filtering has to come from outside, from another system.

  11. Re:HOSTS file by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Until the OS ignores your HOSTS file for some hard-coded domains. If you can't trust your OS, why are you trusting it to filter things out? The filtering has to come from outside, from another system.

    That's why you need to use a firewall. A real one, not that Windows Firewall crap. And block any outgoing connections you don't approve.

  12. Re:/facepalm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Couple of days of reading?, like you could just click the damn "Privacy options" link at install time and uncheck the 4 or 5 options.

    Two major problems with that:

    1) There aren't options to disable all of the spyware in Windows 10.
    2) Even when you "disable" the options that you are graciously allowed to by Microsoft on your own PC, it still sends that data anyway.

    If you knew how to use a packet analyser, you could see that for yourself instead of posting comments that reveal what a clueless idiot you are.

  13. Re:not good enough by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... or just disable the features you don't like... like you could have done all along. If you can use Linux, you can disable any feature you don't like from Windows.

    Except that in Windows 10, you can't. There are many things for which there are no settings to disable them. And even you dig deep, it still doesn't work. But don't take my word for it. Try it.

    Open Task Manager and kill Cortana. It immediately comes back. This is just one example of Microsoft going back to the old scam they used years ago, "We can't remove Internet Explorer because it's too deeply embedded in the OS".

  14. Re:/facepalm by timrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the problem is that MS isn't being completely clear as to what it is they're collecting or why they're collecting it. Take those seven or eight updates to Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 that added forced telemetry collection. No one really knows what it is those things are collecting - MS's own update really doesn't say much other than "It's information needed to ease the transition between Windows 7 or 8.1 and Windows 10" and "It's for customer experience improvements". On top of this, all of the telemetry updates were marked as "Important" in Windows Update, meaning that they'll be automatically installed on most update configurations.

    If MS really had some reason to do this, they should have said exactly what it is they were collecting and why from the get-go, and also had a clear opt-out provision. Failing to do this is what's sparking a lot of paranoia - I've heard everything from "MS's telemetry service is logging everything you type and sending it to MS to improve autocorrect functionality" to "MS is actively recording input from attached webcams and microphones and sending it to MS servers".

    I think if MS were to put out a well-thought out announcement telling people why it is they're doing this, a lot of the paranoia would go away.

  15. Re: HOSTS file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hardware. A seperate system.
    Windows firewall is just an app. A real firewall is on it's own hardware with its own OS.

  16. Re:HOSTS file by chipschap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just run Linux, works every time.

  17. Re:HOSTS file by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it's not the real reason.

    the real reason is pushing the appstore and pushing it for all kinds of applications.

    pushing the appstore was also the reason why they were pushing win8/8.1 for practically free and it's the sole only reason for the shitfest that is metro(they shipped a program environment that was unfinished, unpolished and lacking in api's to replace what it was intended to replace only because they were in a hurry to release an appstore because some execs _thought_ they could get 30% of 3000$ photoshop and cad licenses, which was never going to happen anyway)

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  18. Re:HOSTS file by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Until the OS ignores your HOSTS file for some hard-coded domains.

    What do you mean until?