Slashdot Mirror


The Speakularity, Where Everything You Say Is Transcribed and Searchable

An anonymous reader sends an article from Nautilus about the possible future of speech recognition software. Today, hundreds of millions of people are walking around with devices that can not only record sound, but also do a decent job of turning spoken word into searchable text. The article makes the case that the recording and transcription of normal conversation will become commonplace, sooner or later. Not only would this potentially make a lot more interesting discussion available beyond earshot, but it could also facilitate information retrieval on a personal level.

The article makes an analogy with email — right now, if you communicated with somebody through email a decade ago, you don't have to remember the specifics — as long as you didn't delete it or switch email providers, you can just search and look at exactly what was said. Of course, the power of such technology comes with trade-offs — not only would we be worried about the obvious privacy issues, but many people may feel restricted by always "performing" for the microphones. Some researchers also worry that if we have technology to remember for us, we'll put much less effort into remembering things ourselves.

74 comments

  1. Probably not by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 2

    Not everything that is technically feasible becomes commonplace. Despite increasingly clever marketing creating artificial demands, people still tend to have their own mind.

    1. Re:Probably not by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      And what could possibly go wrong?

      Dear Aunt ...

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clever marketing creating artificial demands

      This is code for "demand for a product I don't like".

    3. Re:Probably not by TWX · · Score: 2

      Thing of it is, it's not the phone that's interpreting the voice, it's servers at the other end of a long network connection that take the recorded sound bite and convert it into text.

      So no, right now it's not terribly feasible because there are not enough servers to handle more than specific requests.

      Besides, how narcissistic is it to document every moment, and who's going to want to review all of that? The only use that I see for such technology is to spy on everyone Stasi-style. Think of the scenario proposed in one of the Christian Bale Batman movies, but instead of the Caped Crusader only looking for keywords and discarding the rest, it would be the government archiving everything worse than the Telescreens did in 1984, to later review for precrime or thoughtcrime prosecution.

      No thanks.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Probably not by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      True, but consider this:

      - We are already all caught on video dozens of times per day.
      - Your smart phone already listens to everything you say, in case you might say some key word that it needs to react to.
      - Newer TVs and other electronic devices are becoming more voice activated.

      The trend is definitely in the direction of more surveillance. It's just a matter of time before that includes audio, as well as video.

    5. Re:Probably not by lgw · · Score: 1

      Thing of it is, it's not the phone that's interpreting the voice, it's servers at the other end of a long network connection that take the recorded sound bite and convert it into text.

      So no, right now it's not terribly feasible because there are not enough servers to handle more than specific requests.

      We know the NSA records every phone call, transcribes everything, and has a searchable DB, for multiple countries including the US, thanks to the Snowden leaks. Voice just isn't that much data, when you buy drives and servers in billion-dollar lots. Your tax dollars at work.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Orphan the pawed beige doors? I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave."

    7. Re:Probably not by tomkost · · Score: 1

      I was imaging this a few years ago. Would be nice to have meeting transcriptions created automatically. People often try to selectively forget or change their remembrance of what they said. And I get the privacy concerns. It's going to happen so we might as well figure out when it's appropriate and how to control it. I'm pretty sure the NSA can turn the mic on your phone and auto transcribe any time they want to. We need SW options and laws to make this work and prevent abuse.

    8. Re:Probably not by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Your smart phone already listens to everything you say, in case you might say some key word that it needs to react to.

      No. No, my phone does not. Does anyone actually run down their battery and keep their phone unlocked and vulnerable to keep some voice-activated app always running?

      Newer TVs and other electronic devices are becoming more voice activated.

      A pointless gimmick that's a usability fail.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    9. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, it's against the law in many places to record conversations without the consent of everyone present. And if anything, people are becoming more aware of privacy violations so these laws probably won't go away any time soon.

    10. Re:Probably not by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Funny. Also precisely on target.

      When speech recognition gets "decent", as TFS inaccurately states, which is to say, when it's good enough to understand me as well as a human does, then a lot of things will change. For instance, I wouldn't be typing this on a keyboard. I'd be speaking, which is quite a bit faster than typing. Probably never touch my phone other than to slip it into a pocket. Especially after there's a decent, power-efficient wearable display, or an in-eye projection, in front of face hologram, etc.

      Right now, what the author calls "decent", I would describe as not even close to acceptable, with a grace note of "better than nothing."

      I think it'll be a white yet, based on the crappy stuff available right now.

      On the other hand, speech synthesis is actually decent at this point in time. :)

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    11. Re:Probably not by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Your phone is always awake, or can be, which is to say, the CPU running, albeit in a lower power state. From there, it takes very little energy to simply record what the mic is picking up. It doesn't need to be translated, and it can be sent, compressed, at widely spaced intervals in terms of battery load. It could be sent while you are otherwise connected. You'd be unlikely to notice a difference in power consumption.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    12. Re:Probably not by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      The government doesn't obey the law.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    13. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big hurdle is true AI, meaning AI which is capable of understanding meaning in the context of prior experience.

      It's not enough to calculate that "recognize speech" is a far more statistically likely phrase than "wreck a nice beach." AI needs to place verbal input into a mental model of the world that is close to our own before it will be capable of matching human transcription capabilities.

      When I worked as a transcriber (before PCs, using only a microcassette player, headphones, and a Selectric II) I often had to replay a section of tape many times, toying with different contexts, before I finally got what the speaker actually said.

    14. Re:Probably not by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      Your phone can listen to you even when it is locked.

      But you are missing the point. Even if we are not quite there yet, we are a very, very short distance from being listened to constantly.

  2. No problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See, brother don't got no prob with no thang. Da man can't got no nut ten on a brother!
    Damn!
    Chump no un da Stan!

    1. Re:No problem! by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

      The translate option in G+ actually does a decent job of translating that sort of text. When I first noticed it I thought, LOL that is racist, then I realised that it is actually very useful.

  3. too late on the memory thing by Colonel_Sam_Flagg · · Score: 1

    They're correct and it's too late, at least for me. I've been using email in this manner since around 2001 or so and have an entire archive of all of my email to back around 1997 or so. I haven't had to revisit 1997-2002, but I still maintain the archive. As for 2002-forward, I use it often to find something that I worked on for one employer or another through those years and will continue to do so. I don't feel there's a need to use brain cells to remember something that's at my finger tips and yes, I am aware, if the SHTF, I won't be able to retrieve everything in there.... the way I look at that, if the SHTF, I won't give a damn about some piece of information from 2002. /CF

    1. Re:too late on the memory thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paranoid, and a digital hoarder? Wow, a winner are you!

    2. Re:too late on the memory thing by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      The email analogy is interesting. Sure, you can usually find something in your email archives if you really have to, but as a knowledge repository it *sucks*. And transcriptions of conversations will make an equally sucky repository, mostly useful for replaying a conversation. What these archives need is technology that can infer some useful info from all that data, like a digital PA whom you can ask questions. "Who was the project manager on that project I did back around 2005?" or "Did Central Services actually mail me the 27B/6 form at some point?" are questions you can get from an email archive with some Google fu, but "Who was involved in project X?" is a bit harder to answer.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  4. Paging Tom Scott by anzha · · Score: 2

    haha. Wow. Tom Scott seems to have called it. Now all we need is Apple to come up with mini cameras in the earbuds.

    --
    Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
  5. In principal decade old email but no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The decade ago email doesn't work. Over a few years and a few different email systems that you were using your email archive will become lost or unusable in that time frame.

    So good luck with that.

    1. Re:In principal decade old email but no. by mlts · · Score: 1

      I learned this as well. Best long term storage because it is readable by any mail program is by using Thunderbird. Outlook can do integrity checks on a mailbox, but only it can use its own format.

      Then there is finding a compressing/archiving format. WinRAR or tar/xz/par are good options for this. This way, the mail spool with 100-200 gigs of spam gets reduced by an order of magnitude at the minimum.

      As for storage? Different media. One copy on DVD, one on an external HDD, and perhaps one stashed on Amazon Glacier (although retrieving it can be costly.)

    2. Re:In principal decade old email but no. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Just store it as plain text. That way you avoid the silly pictures, the 'signatures' that take up a whole screen and a couple of megabytes.

      And Comic Sans.

      It's way better to get rid of Comic Sans.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:In principal decade old email but no. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      The decade ago email doesn't work. Over a few years and a few different email systems that you were using your email archive will become lost or unusable in that time frame.

      So good luck with that.

      Luck?

      One doesn't need "luck" anymore when the online world has access to free webmail, which is also pretty much unlimited in storage capacity with every offering. I've already got a decades worth of email stored in the cloud, instantly searchable. There are also several solutions available to consolidate other email into a single platform/solution, eliminating the burden of managing multiple email systems.

      And if you're concerned about those free webmail services going away, let's be realistic here. They're not going to. Ever. The NSA alone will ensure that.

      As far as work email, that's easy. Retention policies dictate we can't save anything older than five years anyway. Works for me, and I honestly wish we would promote that mentality more with personal communication. Why exactly do I need to save that shit for 50+ years? Let's hear all the shitty reasons come forth.

    4. Re:In principal decade old email but no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See five years. You wouldn't have any luck with 10 year old email either. Why would I care about spam on personal email?

  6. No hyperbole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Certainly would promote responsible speech (or at least greater caution)

    1. Re:No hyperbole? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Certainly would promote responsible speech (or at least greater caution)

      Yes - just like slashdot archives promote responsible speech ... Oh Wait!


      Seriously the fun starts when they have reliable transcription and speech recognition!

    2. Re:No hyperbole? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Certainly would promote responsible speech (or at least greater caution)

      Are you seriously thinking that THAT is something we need?

      Right now, people are getting too scared to say much of anything which is the direct opposite of what we need.

      We need lots of speech, we need more speech that you and others may disagree with....

      If we keep getting fearful or overthinking what we say...eventually nothing useful gets said anymore.

      "Responsible" speech...WTF is that anyway?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:No hyperbole? by fred911 · · Score: 1

      "Certainly would promote responsible speech (or at least greater caution)"

        And new legislation. Depending upon what state you are in, recording audio undisclosed is against the law. Third party disclosure of undisclosed recordings is another matter in itself.

        How long before the fist lawsuit (or arrest) over undisclosed text copy of a conversation? I hope soon, if I hear one more done story, I'm going to barf!

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  7. I never said that. by cygtoad · · Score: 2

    Looking forward to this tech evening up arguments with my wife.

    1. Re:I never said that. by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      Looking forward to this tech evening up arguments with my wife.

      Sometimes its not worth winning the argument. Even if you could prove that she said something different a smile and "well if that's what you think now then that's what counts" is a better approach

    2. Re:I never said that. by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      Looks like you need this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    3. Re:I never said that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a smile and "well if that's what you think now then that's what counts" is a better approach

      Living that cuckold life I see.

  8. Speech recognition is still not that good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I doubt it ever will be.

    1. Re:Speech recognition is still not that good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have my own doubts as well. As of today, the offerings from Apple, Google and Microsoft are OK for extremely limited contexts ("call home") and for hilarity for the preposterous mistakes they make. I wish they could actually do the right thing when I say something like "call Jimmy with Google Hangouts", but even if they get what I am saying, their stupidity prevents them from doing the right thing.

  9. We can also conceive of the SEEgularity by aynoknman · · Score: 2

    That's when the successors to Google glass not only deliver images to our eyes but also monitor them at the same time and record what we're looking at.

    --
    We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
    1. Re:We can also conceive of the SEEgularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Seeingularity" is a slightly better word for it.

    2. Re:We can also conceive of the SEEgularity by RestlessWarrior · · Score: 1

      "Everything that's happening now is happening now..."

    3. Re:We can also conceive of the SEEgularity by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      Followed by the seguelarity where every time you voice a thought, someone uses it to change the subject.

  10. One good thing about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this is the future of humanity, then I can safely stop caring about the future of humanity, because I want no part of it.

  11. I have 1990s email. Email client, not webmail by raymorris · · Score: 1

    If you use an email client for email, rather than a web browser, there's little reason you wouldn't have email from a decade ago handy. Unless you choose to delete the local copies, of course. What I do, is every year or two I make a subfolder under Sentbox, Sentbox/2012-213/ and drag the old emails there. Folders other than Sentbox and Trash generally don't get subfolders, "eBay receipts" has everything I've ever bought and sold on ebay.

    Many people who use IMAP have it set to delete the local copies automatically, but there's no need to use that setting.

    1. Re:I have 1990s email. Email client, not webmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do something like this, except always Unix based and archived out quarterly in mbox format.

      However, one year I was learning more about security and archiving and encrypted my long-term archives to copy to another backup storage machine. Then, I eventually got cavalier with my working machine and lost my working copy.

      So, today I have about 12 years of usable email archives and another decade or so of encrypted backups which are quite secure since I lost track of the decryption key!

  12. Part of a trend by Barbecue911 · · Score: 1

    Well thanks to the wonders of OCR we can already google physical books and street views. So the next step would be to extend recognition technology from static objects to events, objects with the added dimension of time.

  13. Not convinced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how do we authenticate a speech transcript? Once this technology becomes commonplace -- and I'm convinced it will, at least in business and government/political circles -- then how much easier will it be to produce a "record" of a conversation with, say, the CEO of a big corporation that's been doctored to show s/he said something racist or that implicated the company in illegal activity? Faking an audio recording is vastly more difficult than faking a transcript; if this technology doesn't include authentication (and I have no idea how you could do that), then we're taking a huge step in the wrong direction.

  14. OK Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It sounds crazy but are we really that far behind with always listening devices? Imagine brand recognition or "need fulfillment" services pinging off everything you say

    "Man, it's hot out" translates into a device showing a Coke advert. I feel like this isn't far off

    1. Re:OK Google by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      "Man, it's hot out" translates into a device showing a Coke advert. I feel like this isn't far off

      I agree, but the way the technology stumbles before it gets perfected.

      It will probably be an advertisement for a hot man at a Chip N Dale club. The second time you say it, you'll be more careful enunciating it, but then it will be your Nest thermostat that starts cooling down the inside of your place (not having fully understood the "out" in your statement, when you were obviously just "in" when you said it).

      Eventually, you'll just learn to shut up whenever you're in range of that microphone, and you'll be carrying around little pieces of duck tape to place on microphones (just like I had to do last week with my newly upgraded Windows 10 machine).

  15. Black Mirror by abies · · Score: 1

    If you have not seen it, I would suggest watching Black Mirror TV series. Season 2 Episode 1 (usual wikipedia spoilers at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...) is about similar subject - having devices which record everything you see and hear and being able to replay it all at any point.

  16. It's already here by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> having devices which record everything you see and hear

    Those are called cell phones. And Windows 10 machines (soon to be backported to Windows 7/8).

    >> being able to replay it all at any point

    I think we know who already has those.

  17. sign me up by koodawg · · Score: 1

    I have every email sent & received since '94, all in mbox format by year by email address. Easy to do and it comes in handy. Why not record conversations too!

    1. Re:sign me up by geekmux · · Score: 1

      I have every email sent & received since '94, all in mbox format by year by email address. Easy to do and it comes in handy. Why not record conversations too!

      Curious as to how a 20-year old email comes in handy for you. Or even a 15-year old one.

      And yes, it's a serious question, as it helps justify this mentality. Consider the fact we're the last generation to even remember what life is like without a constant barrage of electronic communications, and have a finite amount of data to identify and archive. For future generations, the start and end points to their data archives will be their birth announcement and their obituary. And you already know I'm not being unrealistic about that.

      At some point someone should be asking the painfully obvious question of why we suddenly find a need for our lives to be recorded and archived for eternity.

  18. The future is now by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "but many people may feel restricted by always "performing" for the microphones. "

    You'd better already be that _today_. Not only the NSA listens, as we lately discovered, depending on where you live, half the time you are phoning over one of the police's illegal stingray 'cell-towers'.

    So, don't talk about tax-evasion, drug orders or merchandise that 'fell off the truck' and so on.

    1. Re:The future is now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Everything you say *can* and *will* be used against you...

  19. A Lawyer's wet dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just think about a law suit where discovery has started. Anything that you had recorded and could be searched with be a record that the court could require you to produce. Talk about hanging yourself......

  20. Stewardess, I Speak Jive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First Jive Dude: Shiiiiit, maaaaan. That honky muf' be messin' mah old lady... got to be runnin' cold upside down his head, you know?
    Second Jive Dude: Hey home', I can dig it. Know ain't gonna lay no mo' big rap up on you, man!
    First Jive Dude: I say hey, sky... subba say I wan' see...
    Second Jive Dude: Uh-huh.
    First Jive Dude: ...pray to J I did the same-ol', same-ol'!
    Second Jive Dude: Hey... knock a self a pro, Slick! That gray matter backlot perform us DOWN, I take TCB-in', man!
    First Jive Dude: Hey, you know what they say: see a broad to get dat booty yak 'em...
    First Jive Dude, Second Jive Dude: ...leg 'er down a smack 'em yak 'em!
    First Jive Dude: COL' got to be! Y'know?
    First Jive Dude: Shiiiiit.

    1. Re:Stewardess, I Speak Jive by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      LOL....

      And the thing that made it even funnier, the old lady that said "Hey, I speak jive"..was the lady that played June Cleaver from Leave it to Beaver, about the whitest lady you could find at the time!!

      Ah...man, I bet in today's ultra PC society, you'd never get a movie like Airplane made again.

      There's lots of great movies that likely could not be made today. I don't think Fast Times at Ridgemont High could get made today since it portrayed underage teen sex....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Stewardess, I Speak Jive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the thing that made it even funnier, the old lady that said "Hey, I speak jive"..was the lady that played June Cleaver from Leave it to Beaver, about the whitest lady you could find at the time!!

      Ah...man, I bet in today's ultra PC society, you'd never get a movie like Airplane made again.

      Oh, please. "Old white lady talks like a black guy" gets done so often that it's now regarded as a hacky comedy cliche. It is to comedy what exploding barrels are to first-person shooters.

    3. Re:Stewardess, I Speak Jive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Jive Dude: Shiiiiit.
      ***************
      Translation: Golly!

      LOL

  21. Email archives by sgunhouse · · Score: 2

    I can't say I've looked at anything older than about 3 years, but I do have it going back > 10 years - even though I have changed ISPs 4 times.

  22. If you have a smart phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a smartphone with you at all times, how do you know this isn't already happening?

    After all, all that is needed is an open mike on your end - the other end can do all the transcribing and storage without you ever knowing about it!

  23. A Barrier to Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or it could lead to a severe barrier of communication.

    It's already bad enough with the video clips of someone saying something embarrassing; this has already lead to many people in the public eye choosing their words so carefully as to say nothing at all. Politicians, for instance.

    Imagine every word you speak being transcribed, recorded, stored, made searchable. Every single one.

    People would speak less, communicate less, out of fear that something is going to be revealed or taken out of context and used as a weapon.

    People who who welcome this kind of technology and want it to be a pervasive thing in our society are the same kinds of people who don't understand what it means to be human. The technophiles. "We can, so we should, what consequences?"

  24. One less day by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    Tonight when I go to bed I will be thankful that there's one less day to live.

    1. Re:One less day by briancox2 · · Score: 1

      It isn't obligatory. If you're not having fun here you could always move Oregon.

      --
      We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
    2. Re:One less day by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Do not go to bed. You talk too much when you sleep.

  25. Wait 'til your wife gets hold of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you imagine your wife/girlfriend having this technology ?

    Your life would become hell on earth :)

    1. Re:Wait 'til your wife gets hold of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, wives/girlfriends are bloodsucking bitches that once they get you they will never let you go? I truly pity you if that's the conception that you have of women, and I can't help but wonder what kind of a horrid environment you were brought up in.

  26. A positive light by briancox2 · · Score: 1

    If this becomes wide spread and available to everyone everywhere, we may finally come to peace with the fact that we're all hypocrites. I have come to the conclusion that pointing out someone else's hypocrisy is just a tool used for momentary one-up-manship.

    --
    We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
  27. The Speakularity? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that just rolls off the tongue...

    Don't quit your day job. Unless you're in marketing, in which case you should quit because you're terrible at it.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  28. Perfect recall by PPH · · Score: 1

    you can just search and look at exactly what was said

    Excepting Secretaries of State, of course.

    I just aliased the reformat command to the word 'Benghazi'.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  29. Ah, the good ole days by gregor-e · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nowadays we wring our hands and tsk-tsk the loss of old film reels, books, and magazines, fearing the loss of part of our culture. In the future, people will yearn for the golden days of yore, when an inappropriate remark might elicit a titter of embarrassed laughter before vanishing into the fog of entropy.

  30. technically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the device in your pocket can record audio, but it doesn't transcribe it. the server on the other end does...
    imagine the data usage if you're constantly streaming your babble at google/apple/M$. maybe when the thing in my pocket can do it alone.

  31. Cloud storage of everything i ever spoke/thought.. by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

    NSA and FBI wet dream that is what it is. hell no, i will never allow that. Even if i did i can't even find an email from 6 months ago for something. Unless i tag it on the fly i would never find half of my stuff. the data would have to be auto tagged or organized properly. I do think there is software for that, but I don't think consumers are going to like the creepy feel of searching every word you ever spoke..

    --
    NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
  32. Deal With It by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Truth and honesty are areas that we will have more and more trouble with. People really do not want openes as most feel that they are the ones who will suffer if exposed.

  33. Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not going to happen. Powerful people in the business community regularly use phone instead of email to say things that they cannot say over email. They will never change to recording everything. They will change to recording *certain* things in a different way.