Slashdot Mirror
Miami Installs Free Public Sunscreen Dispensers In Fight Against Cancer
HughPickens.com writes: If you walk along South Beach in Miami right now, you will notice something strange, even by Florida standards: Dotting the sandscapes are sky-blue boxes that supply free sunscreen. In a novel experiment this year, the City of Miami Beach has put 50 free sunscreen dispensers in public spaces, and those dispensers are full of radiation-mitigating goo, free to any and all passersby. BBC reports that one in five people living in Florida will eventually suffer from skin cancer but the new campaign hopes that increasing people's awareness will lead to a change in behavior. "[The sunscreen dispensers'] visibility — even without additional messaging — could be a good cue to action," says Dr Richard De Visser, a psychologist who has researched health campaigns.
The sunscreen is the type that is effective at preventing cancer and premature skin aging: Broad-spectrum, water resistant, and SPF 30. You can buy a product that is labeled as higher than SPF 30, but it's almost always a waste, and potentially harmful. Above SPF 30, the difference is essentially meaningless. SPF 15 filters out about 93 percent of UV-B rays, SPF 30 filters out 97 percent, SPF 50 filters out 98 percent, and SPF 100 might get you to 99. The problem, though, is the psychology of the larger number. "We put on the "more powerful" sunscreens and then suddenly think we're Batman or some other superhero who can stay out in the sun indefinitely." says James Hamblin. "But no sunscreen is meant to facilitate prolonged exposure of bare skin to direct sunlight." Dr. Jose Lutzky, head of the melanoma program out Mount Sinai, says Florida is second behind California in incidence of melanoma but the trend is going in the wrong direction. "Unfortunately, our numbers are growing. That is really something we do not want to be first in."
The sunscreen is the type that is effective at preventing cancer and premature skin aging: Broad-spectrum, water resistant, and SPF 30. You can buy a product that is labeled as higher than SPF 30, but it's almost always a waste, and potentially harmful. Above SPF 30, the difference is essentially meaningless. SPF 15 filters out about 93 percent of UV-B rays, SPF 30 filters out 97 percent, SPF 50 filters out 98 percent, and SPF 100 might get you to 99. The problem, though, is the psychology of the larger number. "We put on the "more powerful" sunscreens and then suddenly think we're Batman or some other superhero who can stay out in the sun indefinitely." says James Hamblin. "But no sunscreen is meant to facilitate prolonged exposure of bare skin to direct sunlight." Dr. Jose Lutzky, head of the melanoma program out Mount Sinai, says Florida is second behind California in incidence of melanoma but the trend is going in the wrong direction. "Unfortunately, our numbers are growing. That is really something we do not want to be first in."
We haven't had as much cancer because the average life span increased from the last few thousand years ago, dramatically increased. Most likely it was people not living long enough to develop cancer what with everything from disease, starvation, and parasites to war and other atrocities, man simply wasn't lucky to live long enough to get cancer. Those that did were probably genetically hardier as well...or rich.
Well, that and people with paler complexions are at a greater risk of sunburn and skin cancer (which is why they have to wear higher SPF).
Northern Europe isn't quite as sunny as much of North America. Put simply, white people aren't really evolved for the Florida climate.
"People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
From :
Joseph M. Mercola (born 1954) is an alternative medicine proponent, osteopathic physician, and web entrepreneur, who markets a variety of controversial dietary supplements
Raising alert status to yellow...
Mercola and colleagues advocate a number of unproven alternative health notions including homeopathy,
Going to code orange...
Mercola criticizes many aspects of standard medical practice, such as vaccination
CODE RED CODE RED!
Sorry, if it looks like a quack and sounds like a quack, he probably is a quack.
"Miami Installs...." is not correct. Miami and Miami Beach are two different cities, separated by Biscayne Bay. Miami itself does not front on the ocean, so its own swimming beach is on Key Biscayne, an island with no direct driving connection to "The Beach". TFA doesn't say if that beach also got the dispensers.
the folks who believe Sunscreen actually causes cancer (chemicals in the lotion vs the sun's rays).
That only happens if you eat too much of it.
What always amazes me is the simultaneous existence(sometimes in the same person) of a paranoid fear of low-intensity non ionizing radiation, especially if emitted by devices with blinky lights; and a conviction that giving yourself radiation burns until the skin initiates a crash program of defensive melanization is 'healthy'.
Way to go, FUD-thing!
10-15 minutes a day of exposure to direct sunlight is enough. Not to mention dietary sources, dickhead.
OTOH, hours per day of exposure to sub-tropical sunlight sans protection is enough to give you nightmares in your fifties, when your doctor starts telling you that "this lump has to go, and this one, and most of your ear, and this one, no, two, no three, on your scalp".
Of course, if you live above/below 60 degrees off the equator, you'll need all the exposure you can get, but for those of us in the rest of the world, we need to to be careful, because we don't have a risk of insufficient exposure, we run the risk of excessive exposure. See, it's all about context. The residents of Miami/Miami Beach don't face the risks of *insufficient* exposure, they face the risks of *excessive* exposure.
Too little, and you face the consequences of insufficient self-synthesized "vitamin D". Too much, and you face having multiple skin tumours.
They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
Facts fight quacks, and you provided none, just ad-hominem attacks.
I don't think this is true. Or at least not as true as it should be. There is evidence to indicate that engaging these people in reasoned discussion boosts their standing because it makes the public think that they are saying something worth refuting. This is what they are craving, so ignoring or mocking them has its place.
soylentnews.org
No, but it ignores a 20 year study that shows sunscreen gives no statistical reduction in skin cancer rates.
If this "study" actually existed, you could have provided a link to it. Yet you didn't.
Here is an actual real study, published in JAMA, that shows the opposite: Sunscreen is effective in preventing melanoma and other skin cancers.