The Install Size of Every PS4 and Xbox One Game
SlappingOysters writes: One of the biggest challenges for gamers during this generation of consoles is ensuring you have enough hard drive space to hold the latest blockbuster. Given that every game needs to be installed in order to be played, and games often weigh in at over 40GB, the 500GB of storage that comes as standard doesn't stretch far. Finder.com has provided a handy resource, listing the install sizes for every PlayStation 4 game (460 and counting) and every Xbox One game (290 and counting). The list is searchable, and can be ordered.
Why don't games just come on special SSDs? They could have two chips, one containing original game data and that chip is set read only after production, the other larger and read/write one contains updates and save data and then unionfs the two together so writes automagically go to the read/write larger one. Then you could just insert the SSD in a special cartridge so its easy to insert into and remove from the console!
It's worth noting that the PS4's hard drive is user-replaceable (for more space and/or SSD speed) while the X-Bone's is not. It's just one of the many things Sony did so much better this generation, even when it shouldn't have cost Microsoft much to keep up.
Can anyone explain why they insisted on using 2,5" drives in both consoles? It seems like they could have shipped with 1tb for the same price if they'd used 3.5" drives. It's not like a few extra cubic inches of volume would have made people walk away from the deal.
Unfortunately it's relitively hard to open up the XBox One to replace the drive. Some have done so, and managed to clone the drive to a larger drive and gotten it to work. I took the easy route, as I have maybe 8 games and my 500gb drive was full. I got a Collective Minds Media Hub http://www.collectiveminds.ca/... (Also on Amazon). It snaps on to the end of the XBox One, making it appear as if it's part of the console, and gives you three front USB 3.0 ports for wired Controllers, Charging, whatever. The top feature, it contains a 2.5" Enclosure. I threw a 2TB 2.5" drive in there. I have it formatted to use as a system drive for games. I keep all my games on it, for archive, and keep the games I play at the time on my internal drive. A cheaper USB 3.0 external drive will work fine. Point being though, the article is correct, that 500gb for launch with games being REQUIRED to be installed to the drive is not enough, when 8 games, and reserved OS space, can fill it up.
Can anyone explain why they insisted on using 2,5" drives in both consoles?
Because of all the XBOX HUEG jokes after Microsoft used a 3.5" drive in the original Xbox. One of the advantages of a console over a living room gaming PC is that a case smaller than a big honkin' PC tower is more likely to fit in with the other hardware next to your TV.
There have been some pretty big 30+ gig PC games over the last few months. I can't check exact sizes easily from here, but Witcher 3, GTA5, Metal Gear Solid 5 and Titanfall all have fairly vast install-footprints. As developers stop cross-developing for the Xbox 360, which is the last platform around limited to DVDs for its physical media, 30+ gig installs are only going to become more common on PC.
You save when buying a console, lose money over time when buying 100's of games.
That's fine for people who live alone, not quite so fine for a parent with multiple gamers in the house. Say you see one game for a console and another game for a PC. The console game allows up to four players on a single TV, while the PC game requires you to buy a separate copy of the game for each player and run each copy on a separate PC. Which game do you buy? Also, time is money, and a lot of people don't want to waste time troubleshooting GPU driver issues, reconfiguring buttons whenever a USB gamepad is plugged in or out, and the like.
I've summed up more of the Peasants' talking points in this article, and I'd be interested to see what I left out.
SonA just built (with my help) a stonking PC. I put a 240Gb SSD in there thinking that would be fine for the hot new games and they could be moved to the platter when needed. 1 week later he's at 90% full. Plenty of games are around 40Gb - Evolve and Arkham Knight to name two.
SonB got a XBone with 500Gb drive - a bunch of Games with Gold later and he's at 80% full within 2 weeks.
F*ck knows where it all goes. Obscene disregard for compression and efficiency?
Can anyone explain why they insisted on using 2,5" drives in both consoles? It seems like they could have shipped with 1tb for the same price if they'd used 3.5" drives. It's not like a few extra cubic inches of volume would have made people walk away from the deal.
Simple answer... size and heat. Everyone wants to produce the smallest console that also doesn't burst into flames.
"Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
240GB SSDs for a gaming machine? Ouch!
Amazon had a special a few days ago for a 1TB SSD for $279... If I didn't already have 1TB SSDs in all our gaming machines, I'd have picked up a few...
My office machines have 256GB SSDs in them, but all they run is Windows, Office, and a few other programs, they are less than half full.