Slashdot Mirror


Plex Is Coming To Apple TV

sfcrazy writes: Apple announced that it is turning Apple TV into a platform, opening it up for third party developers. They have already published the beta of tvOS and tvOS SDK, which developers can play with. Which means Plex is now a possibility on Apple TV. The founder of Plex said, "There is no question we will be able to offer Plex on the platform. There are multiple ways to go about it, based on the tvOS SDK we now have access to. We are now evaluating the best path for Plex and will begin work in earnest once we have evaluated the options. The ability to access great and proven iOS frameworks on the device is great for developers like us — we know the stuff is solid and will perform really well. Our goal is to enable people to enjoy Plex on the hardware platforms of their choice, and there is no doubt this will be a top platform for us."

89 comments

  1. What is Plex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the heck is Plex again?

    I'm enjoying my zombardiocrackle right now and fail to mention what that is just to give you an idea of how I read that....

    1. Re:What is Plex? by dprimary · · Score: 2, Informative

      Never heard of it, but now you will be able to get on an apple tv. Isn't it exciting!!!!!

    2. Re:What is Plex? by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      What you have stated is literally totally incorrect, at this stage it is totally impossible to get 'an', 'Apple', 'TV', all you can get is an appliance called AppleTV which is not actually a TV just a very expensive compact computer being marketed as a TV, you still actually have to buy a TV and when you combined the two together, what you end up with is a very very expensive TV with very limited features. A actual Android big screen TV makes a whole lot more sense and you can install what soft ware you want on in and hugely limit it's invasion of your privacy by running the appropriate security software. They might as well be branding it as AppleIdiotBOX. C'mon Apple make the big SJobs move, where is the Big Screen 75" Apple TV with optional iPad remotes (plural it counts and you can waffle on about and patent rounded corners on another device, ;D ). A you want stackable accessories, hard drive, DVD burner, Modem/Router/Firewall and extra processing power for games.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:What is Plex? by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      I'm enjoying my zombardiocrackle right now.

      Pervert!

    4. Re:What is Plex? by Maritz · · Score: 0

      I've never heard of it, guess the submitter didn't feel it was worth mentioning what it is on the summary.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    5. Re:What is Plex? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2
      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    6. Re:What is Plex? by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      What the heck is Plex again?

      If I were you, I would be less concerned about not knowing what Plex is and more concerned that I didn't know how to do a quick Google search.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    7. Re:What is Plex? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      where is the Big Screen 75" Apple TV with optional iPad remotes

      Apple already DID the Computer/TV thing a few DECADES ago. No one bought it, even though it was actually a pretty cool solution for a kid's room or a dorm room.

      As has been discussed here before, Apple is VERY smart to NOT get into the nearly-zero-profit game of Television-designing-building. Instead, they are marketing an ARM-based iOS-variant microcomputer as a Set-Top Box. MUCH wiser decision. They get all the capabilities that make a "computer TV" special, with none of the baggage of building the display, tuner, HDMI-switching stuff.

      And I would imagine, there will be an App for your iPhone/iPad for the new AppleTV, just like there is one for the current model. For one thing, Apple recognizes, right in the TVOS Developer Docs, that, for example, gaming on the new AppleTV is fundamentally different from gaming, even networked gaming, on the iPhone/iPad.

    8. Re:What is Plex? by jimbo · · Score: 1

      ...just a very expensive compact computer

      I think the price is very reasonable, I bought one AppleTV for $69 that I use in one room and for the other room a Raspberry Pi2 with OSMC. With all the extras (cables, 5GHz Wifi, Powered hub) the Pi2 ended up costing more but was fun to setup. I can stream movies and music to both from a Seagate NAS.

      All in all I'm happy with both, they work fine with my TVs and I wouldn't call any of them expensive. I also think calling users idiots says a lot more about you than them.

    9. Re:What is Plex? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Apple Newton -> iPhone, like whatever dude.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    10. Re:What is Plex? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Apple Newton -> iPhone, like whatever dude.

      Well, Slashdot ate my nicely-composed reply; but suffice it to say that they had a price point to hit, a feature list to hit, and a release date to hit, and so, this is what we have. For now.

      But remember, this box also has a complete SDK, a unique remote (with the possibility of using other devices as remotes/controllers) and voice-recognition (with dual microphones for noise cancelling), and solid Ethernet capabilities. Will it be able to play local audio/video content? You bet. Will it be able to play streamed content? Yup. Will it be able to receive AirPlay content? Just like the previous model. Will it have "Channels", like Hulu, HBO, NetFlix? Sure. Will it do Surround audio? Up to 7.1 . Will it support Interactive, or "Enhanced" Channels (like the NFL Channel)? Saw it in the Demo. And most importantly, Does it have App capabilities? Oh, yes!!!

      Could it support 4k video? Next model.

      Would I like to see more video/audio formats? Sure, who wouldn't?

      Would it be nice to have a USB and SDXC Card slot? Maybe.

      But it really IS a pretty good start.

      The thing is, Apple has to release a PRODUCT. It has to work like an appliance; not like the typical HTPC, which is not only typically too "computer-y", but is usually hideously unreliable, compared with something like a Microwave oven or DVR. Apple would get laughed off the planet if they released something as complicated and unreliable as most HTPCs are, at this point in time. That means that the OS has to be rock stable, even when running third-party apps, the CODECS have to be rock-stable and fast, the networking has to be flawless and fast, the display subsystem has to be well-behaved, etc, etc.

      So, you can consider this more of a "1.0" (or possibly 1.1) device, with much more to come. But if I know Apple, they will continue to add capabilities and features through OS and App updates, and Developers are ALREADY flocking to the platform; so, by this time next year, AppleTV will be MUCH cooler than it is right now, guaranteed.

      Apple knows the power of Apps, and everyone knows that they have an INSURMOUNTABLE lead in that regard, period!

  2. Kodi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean something useful like Kodi will also be able to use the SDK?

    1. Re:Kodi by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Plex is the useful fork of Kodi.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    2. Re:Kodi by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      uhhh no.Plex is what Kodi would look like if they went for monetization. I like Plex, i have a lifetime sub, but at some point they will go over the evil wall and thats why its great Kodi is there. I use both extensively. Plex for remote stuff, Kodi for local.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Kodi by michrech · · Score: 1

      uhhh no.Plex is what Kodi would look like if they went for monetization. I like Plex, i have a lifetime sub, but at some point they will go over the evil wall and thats why its great Kodi is there. I use both extensively. Plex for remote stuff, Kodi for local.

      Why not one for both uses?

      --
      bork bork bork!
    4. Re:Kodi by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Because i dont like be tied to any one tech or company. I store older movies in a streaming setup on Plex on a single server feeding all clients, all 'new release' movies are stored locally on each device delivered via sneakernet. I keep a rolling set of new releases sized to a storage medium available for a good price. Right now im up to a 64 GB ($20) set of new releases. New releases fall off of sneakernet and into Plex after a year or two

      --
      Good-bye
    5. Re:Kodi by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      That seems like a LOT of effort. Like you I have a lifetime sub, came up from xbmc and pytivo before that with some windows media center and hd homerun mixed in along the way.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    6. Re:Kodi by michrech · · Score: 1

      Because i dont like be tied to any one tech or company. I store older movies in a streaming setup on Plex on a single server feeding all clients, all 'new release' movies are stored locally on each device delivered via sneakernet. I keep a rolling set of new releases sized to a storage medium available for a good price. Right now im up to a 64 GB ($20) set of new releases. New releases fall off of sneakernet and into Plex after a year or two

      I fail to see the benefit of what you're doing, especially if all of the media are in common / non-DRMed formats, especially keepin 64GB worth of 'new stuff' locally. It's especially confusing since Plex can "sync" whatever media you select to your local clients (for offline viewing). Am I missing something?

      --
      bork bork bork!
    7. Re:Kodi by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Networks fall over, im ok with the bulk of the collection (old stuff) going down from time to time, which it does. I keep a local set of the newest stuff so that it ALWAYS WORKS no matter what. Its layered functionality. I maintain one set of highly curated and organized movies, and use different 'faces' to serve it, the current faces being Plex and Kodi. Its really not that complicated. Local storage is SUPER cheap right now, dropping $20 per machine on a 64 GB drive is trivial.

      Keep in mind not just serving for me, but other people too at remote sites too, and not everyone has Plex sync or wants to pay for it. Its really easy to hand my relatives a $5 flash drive when i see them at family gatherings, instead of maintaining a hole in their networks so i can upload stuff.

      This is a system i have come up with after long trial and error. I got sick of traveling and not being able to reach my home server for one reason or another, so i added sneakernet to the mix. I would be happy to discuss it more if you are really interested. The entire point was to not have to rely on a any single service or protocol, even TCP/IP.

      --
      Good-bye
  3. Emby is vastly better. by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    Plex is a horrible interface. I have it running on my Amazon Firestick as a cleint and an imac as a server. The two constantly fail to find each other. I always end up restarting it on mac and rebooting the fire stick a couple of time before the content appears on the other. I used it as a way to show DVDs on my firestick. But it stinks. Now I use Emby media browser and it works like a charm every time. Emby is also free besides working better.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Emby is vastly better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emby is decent. I just wish it was more stable. It crashes at the drop of a hat for me, and the only hacky workaround that half works for me is a cron entry that calls the emby startup script literally every other minute.

      Also their roku app could be prettied up a ton...it's functional for the most part though.

    2. Re:Emby is vastly better. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 2

      The nice thing about Plex is the transcoding, Unless you don't want it to do transcoding, in which case you have to fight with it to keep it from transcoding everything. And yes there's tons of issues related to networking.

    3. Re:Emby is vastly better. by Rob+Lister · · Score: 1

      The new Roku app is in Beta now. You can download it if you're a paying member. It looks very nice but NQRFPT yet. They're still adding features and working out inconsistencies in navigation. I've yet to discover an operational bug.

    4. Re: Emby is vastly better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emvy transcoded too.

      I switched from plex to emby and have been very pleased.

    5. Re:Emby is vastly better. by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

      Came here to say the same thing. I ran away from Plex, it's got all the marketing but none of the utility that Emby does.

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    6. Re:Emby is vastly better. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Are you using your imac as a personal machine as well as a PMS server? Wifi or wired? My DEDICATED Plex server on wired gigabit works flawlessly. Set it up as a proper server, not just another service on your personal workstation if you want the best results. Workstations have a ridiculous amount of cruft for the user that can break server applications. Its fine if Plex doesnt work for you, but calling it crap based on your limited experience is wrong.

      --
      Good-bye
    7. Re:Emby is vastly better. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I dont understand why its so hard to turn transcoding off. My ARM-based NAS can install plex natively, but its useless because the clients will request tanscoding and the app shits itself.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:Emby is vastly better. by michrech · · Score: 1

      Plex is a horrible interface. I have it running on my Amazon Firestick as a cleint and an imac as a server. The two constantly fail to find each other. I always end up restarting it on mac and rebooting the fire stick a couple of time before the content appears on the other. I used it as a way to show DVDs on my firestick. But it stinks. Now I use Emby media browser and it works like a charm every time. Emby is also free besides working better.

      I can't speak to your PMS iMac server, but the Amazon FireTV stick *sucks* for Plex. I have both an HP Stream Mini 200-010 and a Nexus Player -- both are *far* better for Plex than the FireTV stick...

      --
      bork bork bork!
    9. Re:Emby is vastly better. by michrech · · Score: 1

      Are you using your imac as a personal machine as well as a PMS server? Wifi or wired? My DEDICATED Plex server on wired gigabit works flawlessly. Set it up as a proper server, not just another service on your personal workstation if you want the best results. Workstations have a ridiculous amount of cruft for the user that can break server applications. Its fine if Plex doesnt work for you, but calling it crap based on your limited experience is wrong.

      I actually have PMS / sabnzbd / sonarr installed in a WHS2011 VM on my HP Z800. Works perfectly with my HP Stream Mini 200-010 and my Nexus Player. I've even used that VM to watch my movies / TV shows remotely while in hotels (using my Verizon work phone as a mobile hotspot) with zero issues. :D

      --
      bork bork bork!
    10. Re:Emby is vastly better. by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      The distasteful thing with transcoding is that it's a hack you shouldn't need, and therefore probably don't need. It's always going to be associated with some other problem: either a crappy player or maybe some network limitation (e.g. 2.4GHz wifi too slow (or too shared!) for your bitrate, and 5GHz can't reach).

      The hack works around the problem, but necessarily reduces quality. So you get something that works (and that's good!) but the original problem remains, staring you in the face day after day, a constant reminder that you are missing out on modern technology.

      So eventually you'll fix it, and then you won't need transcoding anymore. It should usually end with 1) "Hey, maybe my game console or tablet isn't well-suited to playing movies, because its ridiculous software limitations are deliberately-added defects intended to manipulate me into paying for some particular vendor's service instead of letting me take advantage of the wider market." or 2) "it's time for that part of the house to join the 21st century, so I'm going to get some Cat6 over there no matter how many crawlspace black widows do their 'you shall not pass' Gandalf impression."

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    11. Re:Emby is vastly better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it is not Plex but the Firestick then.
      I use it on the xbox 360, my phones, and 3 computers. No issues. The xbox is a little slow but that is it.

    12. Re:Emby is vastly better. by Cut · · Score: 1

      The Roku app is now available to all.

      https://blog.plex.tv/2015/08/25/graduation-day-the-roku-and-xbox-360-apps-are-now-free-for-everyone/

    13. Re:Emby is vastly better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Plex is a horrible interface... fails to work... because I run it on my lousy hardware known as a Firestick."

      LOL.

    14. Re:Emby is vastly better. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      netflix, amazon, and emby all run fine on a firestick and provide 100% exactly the same services plex on a firestick does. Ergo the problem is plex.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    15. Re:Emby is vastly better. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      odd then that emby and vlc player, which achieve the same result as plex work fine on a non-dedicated workstation. Plex is therefore crap if it requires a dedicated server.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    16. Re: Emby is vastly better. by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't have to transcode. The client should just decide and play. Worked great on my boxee box and works great now on my OpenELEC box. Way better than plex or DLNA every have for me, and I see all my files not just an arbitrary subset like with plex.

  4. Translation by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 0

    "We have nothing new to offer this time round, so we're turning our existing offering into a... PLATFORM. w00t."

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  5. Re:I don't know what plex is. by frnic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You called the article "dumb" because of your lack of knowledge? Interesting concept...

  6. That would help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not plex per se (I'm not a fan of where they took the project since late 2013) but I've always considered lack of support for local media to be a showstopper for Apple TV.

    If I knew I could install something like Kodi or an emby client that could supply unrestricted access to my local content, I'd buy an Apple TV tomorrow.

    1. Re:That would help by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Not plex per se (I'm not a fan of where they took the project since late 2013) but I've always considered lack of support for local media to be a showstopper for Apple TV.

      Huh? I've been using iTunes to serve up rips of my purchased DVDs and Blu-Ray discs to my Apple TV for years.

      I'm not all that crazy about using iTunes, but it works and has been fairly stable for me. And the Apple TV (and Macs in general) has been the only client that never seems to hiccup on some older movies I've got (like The Front Page) that, for whatever reason, are at a slightly non-standard aspect ratio. I'm looking forward to trying out Plex as an alternative (although I'm in agreement with you- I'm not particularly happy with the path they've headed down).

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:That would help by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah - any iTunes library worked. Music, Movies, Photos - any content you could load onto a machine. A $150 headless win machine could do it.

      The only problem was auto-loading of content. I use sabnzbd/usenet to load serial content (TV shows), and that doesn't play well with iTunes. Also, I can get Plex served when I'm not at home and iTunes isn't good at that either.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:That would help by rthille · · Score: 2

      That's not local media. That's remote. Local media is stored on the device, doesn't need the device to be on the network, and doesn't require your mac/windows box to be turned on and running iTunes.

      Kinda like the AppleTV V1 was.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  7. Re:Woah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows TVs are one of the major enablers of illegally torrented video.

    Fixed that for you.

    Plex is a media manager. What media you choose to manage is up to you, just like what media you choose to watch is up to you.

  8. HELL YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now, since it's Apple, my mom can Plex with only 1 finger! As soon as she learns what Plex is, and probably, maybe, English, she can use it very efficiently! Will that play her VHS tapes?

    1. Re:HELL YEAH! by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Will that play her VHS tapes?

      There's an App for that! [j/k]

  9. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this will be as big of a flop as their current iOS port that crashes after a few minutes of playing content.

    1. Re:Hmmm by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this will be as big of a flop as their current iOS port that crashes after a few minutes of playing content.

      Or their OS X version that crashes, well, whenever it feels like it.

  10. Hurr. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumbass visiting tech site can't figure out how to use Google or Wikipedia upon encountering story about widely known software that is personally unknown to his dumb self.

    Dice-sponsored film at 11.

  11. What is Plex by steveha · · Score: 5, Informative

    Plex is a home media server, forked from XBMC.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plex_(software)

    Wikipedia says the server is "freemium" so I guess it's free but you can buy upgrades. There are apps for iOS and Android; the apps aren't free either. And there is some kind of cloud account you can get, and use for syncing your content across the Internet.

    I've never heard of this before, but it seems worth checking out if you don't already have a media center solution.

    Plex web site:
    https://plex.tv/

    Breakdown of what you can get for free vs. what costs:
    https://support.plex.tv/hc/en-us/articles/202526943-Plex-Free-vs-Paid

    Reddit discussion of cost of Plex:
    https://www.reddit.com/r/Chromecast/comments/2f9f0k/what_is_the_true_cost_of_plex/

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:What is Plex by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia says the server is "freemium" so I guess it's free but you can buy upgrades. There are apps for iOS and Android; the apps aren't free either. And there is some kind of cloud account you can get, and use for syncing your content across the Internet.

      It's freemium.

      Free features is local media server and online streaming.

      Pay and you can get a premium account. Premium features include free apps, use of a third party cloud storage provider, offline mode and others.

      The Plex apps work by either charging you a one-time in-app purchase, or if you have a premium account, it's free. So if your needs are low, you can get away with just paying $5 for the app.

      There's no cloud storage provided, but you can link your account to Google Drive, DropBox and others. What happens then is the server can upload the files to those services so you can access it remotely as part of an automatic sync thing.

  12. No more iTuines server by mccalli · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is excellent news for me. I have a Synology and a 10.6.8-based original Intel Mac Mini that just acts as an iTunes and Crashplan server. All my films converted from DVD/blu-ray are stored on the Synology, but I need iTunes running to be able to access it on the Apple TV. With this I should be able to use Plex on the Synology and remove the need for iTunes. Crashplan can also be made to run on a Synology, so I can completely eliminate the need for that Mac Mini.

    With a few more apps, like Amazon Instant and BBC iPlayer, this thing could then completely cover what I do. One caveat - just please, please, please give me paid app options and not freebies with adverts in the UI.

    1. Re:No more iTuines server by Pope · · Score: 1

      I have an old Intel Mac with a Broadcom HD decoder chip in place of the WiFi card, running XBMC with Crystal HD. Works like a charm.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:No more iTuines server by macs4all · · Score: 1

      This is excellent news for me. I have a Synology and a 10.6.8-based original Intel Mac Mini that just acts as an iTunes and Crashplan server. All my films converted from DVD/blu-ray are stored on the Synology, but I need iTunes running to be able to access it on the Apple TV. With this I should be able to use Plex on the Synology and remove the need for iTunes. Crashplan can also be made to run on a Synology, so I can completely eliminate the need for that Mac Mini. With a few more apps, like Amazon Instant and BBC iPlayer, this thing could then completely cover what I do. One caveat - just please, please, please give me paid app options and not freebies with adverts in the UI.

      My big question is: Why doesn't Apple just create an iTunes daemon, so you don't have to do hinky shit like "create a user account and run iTunes on it all the time"; which inevitably leads to whining by the OS if you have to Restart the "server" computer? Could it be THAT difficult to create a faceless version of the iTunes app that launchd launches when needed, and that has iTunes Sharing always on? Heck, just a small tweak to the iTunes Library database and it could have user-specific Libraries, too, with some items being "globally-acessible" (all users) and others only by a certain user (or users?).

  13. To clarify some... by wbr1 · · Score: 2
    I have been using plex for over a year. I do not subscribe, I have use the free system as a media server on my primary home machine.

    When I got a chromecast, I did pay for the 4.99 app so that I could use it to stream to the chromecast. I was using Bubble UPnP + MxPlayer for android playback, but BubbleUPnPs chromecast support was limited. Now BubbleUpnP has it but requires a separate paid transcoding server, so I stuck with Plex across the board.

    Paying for plex allows easy setup of across the internet streaming. I never needed that feature since I have a business class connection, static IP and VPN at home. When I am travelling, my devices llook like they are on my LAN anyway, so need to stream some other way out of my network.

    The only issue I have had is that randomly (after days) the plex server program will stop responding and need a restart. That is easy enough to do, although I could probably post on their forums and look at the logs to determine why.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:To clarify some... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea. I kept dealing with the same thing and finally threw in the towel. There is a product called younity that i now use. It does all that Plex does, but is super easy to use and doesn't have any networking crap to setup. It's also free to stream to my iPhone. Way better, IMO.

    2. Re:To clarify some... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something odd in your setup then. My Plex server has been running on top of CentOS 6 for a few months now without a restart.

      Is it the best thing since sliced bread? No, but it fits my needs of "keep a few dozen GB of music files online and streamable / syncable to my devices". I have my (2) laptops, my desktop, my roku3, my android phone and my android tablet all hooked up to it. I went ahead and ponied up for the lifetime subscription to get access to the premium features.

  14. All most people want is a streaming device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think Apple TV is over kill for what most people want in a entertainment device. Many just want a streaming device and not a full blown device that runs apps and other crap. If your into gaming your going to buy a PS4 or Xbox of some kind. Apple is trying to exploit the Apple TV to sell apps and other Apple products but they fail to keep the price inline with other devices. Unless your married to Apple your not going to spend $150 to stream Netflix. Your going to buy a USB stick and/or a Roku like device for less. The whole Siri voice search is gimmicky and has really failed to live up to its hype. Apple unfortunately seems to be stuck in a rut of gimmicky stuff rather then revolutionary products.

    1. Re:All most people want is a streaming device by FranTaylor · · Score: 0

      gosh, you are so right, people are the experts on what they want, nobody ever comes out with good ideas

    2. Re:All most people want is a streaming device by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I think Apple TV is over kill for what most people want in a entertainment device. Many just want a streaming device and not a full blown device that runs apps and other crap.

      And if you'd watched the Keynote, you'd know that they are continuing to sell the current model AppleTV for $69, which meets the needs you mentioned.

  15. About fucking time by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    And about too fucking late. With A-Fire and Roku being 1/2 the cost and Chromecast being 1/3 the cost of the cheaper v3, and not requiring a secure cert hack and hijack of another app, or jailbreaking of an old model, I've put them on all the other TVs.

    Apple needs to bring more to the party. Like a la carte cable channels. That would be "One More Thing..." that would make me drop the cash.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:About fucking time by Rob+Lister · · Score: 1

      Apple needs to bring more to the party. Like a la carte cable channels. That would be "One More Thing..." that would make me drop the cash.

      The a la carte cable channels are a function of what the individual channels allow. Lots of channels are making lots of deals with lots of streaming companies to allow just that. Others are sticking strictly with the cable providers [for now]. Apple made an exclusive deal with HBO recently so you can get that already (app is HBO Now as opposed to HBO Go). CBS is 'out there' too but they're crazy expensive. ESPN made a deal with Sling. I suspect that in five years you'll be able to get most anything (but there will still be some bundling. So ... you'll have what you want but it is unlikely that any will be limited strictly to Apple, which is a good thing because AppleTV sucks.

    2. Re:About fucking time by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Apple needs to bring more to the party. Like a la carte cable channels. That would be "One More Thing..." that would make me drop the cash.

      You mean like this, which they have had working for a bit, or this which they have been working on for most of this year?

  16. Failing to be omniscient is not dumb by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    You called the article "dumb" because of your lack of knowledge? Interesting concept...

    Not a difficult concept. Articles are supposed to transfer knowledge from people who know it to people who don't, and summary articles, in particular, are supposed to let everybody quickly decide whether they are interested enough to read on. If everybody knew everything we wouldn't need articles. Things that don't do what they are designed to do are dumb.

    The "Version 1.25 of Qxwrple launched" pathology is common on Slashdot and really should be something high on editors and article submitters checklist. (At least in this case you only need to read as far as the second paragraph in TFA to get a clue as to what Plex does).

    Of course, some judgement is required - this is a tech website after all - but there's a distinction between expecting the audience to know technical terms and expecting them to recognise every tech product name.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  17. I had never heard of it before getting a Smart TV by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had never heard of it before getting a Samsung Smart TV and since I didn't actually get the 51" Plasma to watch broadcast television, I had to find a way to stream my media from a server, without actually having a laptop next to the TV. Anyway, I looked up possible technologies and DLNA that the TV supported seemed the best solution. After I painfully found out DLNA in practice is riddled with problems, I went back to google and Plex came up. A free Plex Media Sever was installed on the Mac Pro, an also free client was installed on the Smart TV, et voila, streaming with full support of any format I had, multiple audio & subtitle streams, plus excellent library organization (it recognizes your media, shows covers/meta data, even downloads subtitles automatically with the proper plugin).
    I also got a chromecast dongle at some point and I use it to send some browser video streams to the TV, but for two years now Plex has served me very well. If you have a platform, like a Smart TV/Smart Bluray etc where the Plex client is free, definitely give it a try.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  18. Looks like Apple is Jealous of Roku by rahvin112 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Roku validated the open channel (app) model. Looks like Apple is jealous of Roku's success and decided to copy their model.

    Apple has very few original ideas.

    1. Re:Looks like Apple is Jealous of Roku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plex is already on AppleTV https://github.com/iBaa/PlexConnect

    2. Re:Looks like Apple is Jealous of Roku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That shit is ghetto

  19. Re:I had never heard of it before getting a Smart by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    After I painfully found out DLNA in practice is riddled with problems, I went back to google and Plex came up.

    For people who cannot install Plex and must use DLNA, there is PS3MediaServer, a transcoding DLNA server for major operating systems.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. You just can't beat an HTPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are so many of these little HTPC-wannabe computers, but not a single damn one of them is nearly as good. And with every passing year, it just keeps getting easier and cheaper to build the HTPC. (Just what do you think Apple, Roku, etc are doing?) Even just a decade ago, making machines fanless and quiet was a somewhat serious topic that took some research and care. Now you barely have to think about it, because it's so easy. Instead of acquiring technical debt to get yourself dependent on proprietary services (e.g. iTunes) and then also ending up with something that doesn't even work as nicely, just fucking do it.

    You don't need Plex. You don't need any DLNA nonsense at all. (My server has two DLNA/UPNP daemons running, but in practice they're just idling and never really used by any client.) Here's the key: NFS. (Or Samba if that's your style, but NFS is actually easier.) Your HTPC uses NFS to get files from the server. You run a file manager (Thunar or whatever) and play with mpv. And then you use the awesome and best and easiest remote control that anyone's ever invented: the wireless scrollwheel mouse. So many people try to top the mouse, and they never do it.

    (We could have a huge thread about that alone: the comical failure of a coffee table with 4 IR remotes on it, compared to a mouse.)

    Yes, it will initially cost more than the budget stuff like AppleTV or WD Live or Roku (or whatever Google's failure du jour is; I haven't kept up with them), but it won't need to be replaced in two years and it'll be way more capable and never let you down. Your server will never need to transcode, because mpv will Just Fucking Work with whatever you throw at it, and then play back at the very best quality than is possible.

    (All that said, if you simply must use one of these budget HTPC replacements, WD Live towers above the rest.)

    Stop cutting corners, people. Everything gets easier and better when you don't. And I'm pretty sure that if you stay away from the proprietary services, it eventually gets cheaper too, the couple hundred extra dollars of hardware eventually paying for itself.

    1. Re:You just can't beat an HTPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that to build a proper and capable HTPC (case, power, remote, and adequate processing/graphics) you're still looking at more than $500, plus a nontrivial build and configuration. A $100 Roku is a nice alternative.

      Having said that, being able to run kodi with its really nice interface (especially with a keyboard) and great ability to organize a large changing media collection is nice. Still my hacked together HTPC has about $800 worth of old components in it and it looks like shit because the old tower I'm using is so out of place with the other audio equipment.

  21. Why not just skip Apple TV by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    I've been running Plex on a Mac Mini for about 5years now. Great software, easy interface and optimized for controlling with an apple remote control (silver 3 button, not white 2 button) or iphone app. I have it connected via HDMI directly to my receiver and GigE to my LAN. All my content I keep on a NAS array in the corner.

    I actually bought the mac mini specifically for Plex as at the time windows and linux support was kinda weak. Now they've got plex running in TVs and other devices.

    1. Re:Why not just skip Apple TV by chappel · · Score: 1

      I ran an older (core2-duo) mac Mini connected to my livingroom TV via DVI/HDMI for years, just playing videos in VLC set to full screen, and using a bluetooth trackpad as a remote, using the Finder as an interface. It got the job done, but was a bit clunky and twiddly. For whatever reason, I couldn't ever get Plex to run as both server and client without horrible performance issues (the earlier Minis were well known for wimpy video power). With some recent home wiring improvements I swapped the mini for an Apple TV and moved the Plex server component to a different, more current Mini in a different room and implemented the DNS hack to re-route the AppleTV 'Trailers' to be plex, and it's been running great for several months now. The apple TV with plex has a much friendlier, more usable interface, uses less power, has been more stable, requires much less tech-stuff in my living room - I've really been happy with it. The only drawback is there is no usable volume control for speakers connected directly to the Apple TV, so I can't change the volume on my powered speakers fed directly off it - only on the crappy built-in TV speakers. I'm curious to see if that changes at all with the new Apple TV, and excited to see a native Plex app for it, so I think I'll eventually get one anyway, even if I need to get some additional components to get better volume control. My original plan was to rip my DVDs and import them into iTunes, then use it to stream to the Apple TV, which worked, but was REALLY painful to get everything in place, and still clunky to use. It was very clear Apple intended uses to re-purchase any content they planned to watch. Plex isn't perfect, but I've been really happy with it compared to everything else I've tried.

  22. Apple IOS Developers & tvOS will kill Roku by Danathar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What this announcement shows, is that players like Roku need to be VERY afraid.

    Say all you want about the fact that the new Apple TV specs wise is ho hum (and I'd agree with you), but the fact of the matter is that all those people who are familiar with Xcode development and the IOS APIs now can develop for tvOS.

    What that means is that in a VERY short amount of time the number of apps will go from zero to crazy in no time at all. Roku has struggled for a LONG time to get a good set of apps for people to use. There are hardly that many games for Roku (the major ones though like Angry Birds are there) and everything else are screensavers, streaming channels or Church apps (for the most part).

    Say what you want about how the Apple TV sucks, the fact that millions of Xcode developers for IOS can develop for it means it will pretty much sink companies like Roku.

  23. The very reason I switched from ATV to Fire TV by zerofoo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I left the iTunes Apple TV world for a Synology box running plex and Amazon Fire TVs running the Plex client. I got tired of encoding all my media in a format that iTunes was happy with and I got really tired of having to restart iTunes.

    Apple is trying to do what Roku and Amazon Fire TV have been doing for a few years now....big surprise.

  24. Plex is awesome by sremick · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not getting all the hate for Plex. Plex is amazing.

    It's not just a media server. It's a full-blown server and media management and distribution system akin to running your own Netflix. I paid the one-time lifetime pass and it's been totally worth it. We stream to many Rokus, computers and Android devices amongst my household and immediate family.

    Having paid for the PlexPass, all the clients I add to my Plex Home group are free so users don't have to pay for each client. I run it on a 6-disc FreeNAS RAIDZ2 system that has enough CPU horsepower to run Plex Server right on the NAS itself. The system is beautiful and amazingly capable. Just drop any old video file on, and Plex handles everything else: metadata, posters, trailers, organization, and any necessary transcoding to play any type of video file onto any client regardless of its capabilities.

    I know Emby is popular because it's open-source, and perhaps some parts of it are better than Plex (I've never used Emby). But the reviews I've seen put them pretty close to each other, with often Plex having a slight edge overall. But probably ultimately depends on what you're doing with it and what features matter to you.

    Anyone who flat out hates Plex probably doesn't understand how it's really supposed to be used and what needs it's meant to address. It's easy to hate the perfect screwdriver if you're trying to use it as a hammer.

    1. Re:Plex is awesome by puregen1us · · Score: 1

      I would add to this the mobile power it has too - all of which I've wanted from iTunes for a long time.

      With PlexPass I can tell each client what I want to sync, how much space to use, how many episodes to sync etc, so my mobile devices always have what I need to watch - and it'll do it over WiFi and cell connections too.

      If I want an episode on the way into work, Plex will remove it from my iPhone and automatically queue up the next for the trip home. What isn't downloaded will stream, whether I'm in the house or not.

      The real beauty of Plex for me is the persistent access to my media library, from anywhere I am, on any device, be it the LG SmartTV in my living room, iPads, iPhones, computers, etc.

      I can sign-in to Plex from any computer anywhere (with sufficient bandwidth, and the transcoding takes care of that), and I can view all media. I've yet to meet someone (especially non-geeks) who aren't totally blown away by it.

  25. plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay for access from your I phone. I thought it would be. I set up Zina to serve my Music it is free It just dont work with the latest database so you have to instal an older version For me I rewrote the code to make it work but not well enough for others to use.

    Older sql works just fine.

  26. Re:What is comming to what? by macs4all · · Score: 1

    Apple TV? That still a thing? And what ever Plex is. I guess the 13 people, that have an Apple TV will be happy for something new.

    Yeah, more like 25 MILLION. And that was BEFORE the new model came out.

  27. Re:What is comming to what? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

    Sad that there are that many stupid people still allowed to walk around unattended in public.

  28. Re:What is comming to what? by macs4all · · Score: 0

    Sad that there are that many stupid people still allowed to walk around unattended in public.

    I know; but there might still be hope for those like you yet.