Slashdot Mirror


First Library To Support Anonymous Internet Browsing Halts Project After DHS Email

An anonymous reader writes with an update to the news we discussed in July that a small library in New Hampshire would be used as a Tor exit relay. Shortly after the project went live, the local police department received an email from the Department of Homeland Security. The police then met with city officials and discussed all the ways criminals could make use of the relay. They ultimately decided to suspend the project, pending a vote of the library board of trustees on Sept. 15. DHS spokesman Shawn Neudauer said the agent was simply providing "visibility/situational awareness," and did not have any direct contact with the Lebanon police or library. "The use of a Tor browser is not, in [or] of itself, illegal and there are legitimate purposes for its use," Neudauer said, "However, the protections that Tor offers can be attractive to criminal enterprises or actors and HSI [Homeland Security Investigations] will continue to pursue those individuals who seek to use the anonymizing technology to further their illicit activity." ...Deputy City Manager Paula Maville said that when she learned about Tor at the meeting with the police and the librarians, she was concerned about the service’s association with criminal activities such as pornography and drug trafficking. "That is a concern from a public relations perspective and we wanted to get those concerns on the table," she said.

130 comments

  1. They're just pushing it offshore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although one could read the discouragement of new Tor exit nodes as a desire to control the majority of exits...

  2. Hooray culture of fear! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You asked for it, Middle America.

    1. Re:Hooray culture of fear! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You asked for it, Middle America.

      No, it wasn't "middle America" that asked for a culture of fear.

      It was our political and financial elite that forced one upon us.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Hooray culture of fear! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "Middle America" would prefer to keep their own firearms to deal with "fear", thankyouverymuch. It's hyper-concerned liberals in the big cities who want to disarm us and then use the Government to protect us.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:Hooray culture of fear! by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      And then set the cops to jail when they actually try it.

  3. Bullshit ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    God I'm so sick of this bullshit:

    DHS spokesman Shawn Neudauer said the agent was simply providing "visibility/situational awareness," and did not have any direct contact with the Lebanon police or library. "The use of a Tor browser is not, in [or] of itself, illegal and there are legitimate purposes for its use,"

    It's legal, and there are legitimate uses for it ... but we're going to list off a bunch of scary hypotheticals, and insinuate how you'd be responsible for everything on the planet.

    I hope the library board sends back a big fuck you like librarians sometimes do ... give up the right to anonymity on the notion that it might might lead to something bad is the argument of cowards and fascists.

    No matter what anybody likes to think, the US stopped being a free country or a champion of liberty and democracy 14 years ago. And you'll never get it back.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Bullshit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And what reasons do you have for not running a Tor node yourself?

    2. Re:Bullshit ... by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

      It's legal, and there are legitimate uses for it ... but we're going to list off a bunch of scary hypotheticals, and insinuate how you'd be responsible for everything on the planet.

      The idea to install Tor services in libraries emerged from Boston librarian Alison Macrina's Library Freedom Project, which aims to teach libraries how to "protect patrons' rights to explore new ideas, no matter how controversial or subversive, unfettered by the pernicious effects of online surveillance." (The Library Freedom Project is funded by Knight Foundation, which also provides funding to ProPublica.)

      DHS spokesman Shawn Neudauer said the agent was simply providing "visibility/situational awareness,"and did not have any direct contact with the Lebanon police or library. "The use of a Tor browser is not, in [or] of itself, illegal and there are legitimate purposes for its use," Neudauer said, "However, the protections that Tor offers can be attractive to criminal enterprises or actors and HSI [Homeland Security Investigations] will continue to pursue those individuals who seek to use the anonymizing technology to further their illicit activity."

      How dare someone counterbalance your legitimate use hypotheticals with scary illegitimate use hypotheticals by sending information to other people for use in public discussions and not directly contacting them with jackbooted thuggery.

      This decidedly indirect jackbooted thuggery is perilously close to free speech, petitioning the government, and democracy. Only the "good" guys get to do that. Plus the only value judgment relevant to the library should be whether the service is legal, which it is...

    3. Re:Bullshit ... by easyTree · · Score: 2

      Fear of perpetual imprisonment on trumped-up secret charges?

    4. Re:Bullshit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DHS spokesman Shawn Neudauer said the agent was simply providing "visibility/situational awareness," and did not have any direct contact with the Lebanon police or library. "The use of an online pseudonym, encryption, or even halloween masks is not, in [or] of itself, illegal and there are legitimate purposes for its use,"

    5. Re:Bullshit ... by lgw · · Score: 1

      No matter what anybody likes to think, the US stopped being a free country or a champion of liberty and democracy 14 years ago. And you'll never get it back.

      Long before then, I'm afraid. Sadly, all the Patriot act did was say "all the rights you already lose if we call you a drug dealer? Now you also lose all those rights if we call you a terrorist". And lawmakers from both parties had it ready to go, just in case there was a disaster they could take advantage of. Plus the NSA was monitoring all of us regardless, they didn't need a specific excuse.

      We're certainly being surveiled as much as the average Chinese citizen, though we used to have the advantage that we still had free speech - you could criticize the government as long as you didn't actually plot to overthrow it. Now that's starting to fade as well, not directly yet, but through groups of citizens harassing anyone who departs from the groupthink. So far that's just on social media, so although it's gotten people fired, it doesn't quite look like Germany in the 30s yet.

      This sort of thing is quite worrying, however. I didn't think we were far enough along that a major newspaper would be highlighting where the Jews are causing trouble, so color me shocked. We must find some way to change course, to not fall into the same trap, but we seem too obsessed with "making sure the wrong lizard doesn't win" to vote for anything but more of the same. Still, voting matters, especially in the primaries, and there is still time.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Bullshit ... by amRadioHed · · Score: 2

      14 years ago only? I think you should check your count. The drug war has been taking away people's freedom and abused to take their property for far longer than 14 years.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    7. Re:Bullshit ... by sims+2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      My reasons? I like being able to use the net.

      Many websites preemptively ban tor exit node ip's

      If you have a extra ip you can dedicate to it its not a problem otherwise its a serious pita.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    8. Re:Bullshit ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So far that's just on social media, so although it's gotten people fired, it doesn't quite look like Germany in the 30s yet.

      It's looking more like Germany in the '30s every day.

      http://www.slate.com/content/d...

      https://prod01-cdn06.cdn.first...

      https://markosun.files.wordpre...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Bullshit ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Yes, absolutely ... but 14 years ago was when Americans started thinking it was patriotic and accepted it with open arms.

      So while Americans used to say "give me liberty or give me death", and used to joke about "papers please comrade" ... suddenly I'm betting a majority will all say "well, as long as it's to stop terrorists, or drug dealers, or kiddie fiddlers ... or pretty much anything you can think of .. then we're OK with it."

      And the people who have historically been the most leery of government intrusion are just as likely to be cheerleaders of this.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Bullshit ... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Ah, we see how people dive in to defend the establishment by likening an anti-establishment candidate to the Nazis.

      Trump and Sanders have the most important thing in common: they'll actually change something if elected. And at this point, even random change is very likely to be for the better Both of them are leading in the primary polls as well, which is a great sign that voters finally want real change, not just for their team to win the big game.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:Bullshit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that TOR is a very common source of abuse. So common that any administrator who has any experience at all blocks all exit nodes at the router, and with a web page, presents either a minimal experience to none at all because of this.

      The physical example would be a library providing Guy Fawkes masks and hoodies to all comers, saying that it might be good for some use so the street camera can hide their face. If something happens through that exit node, that library will be held civilly and criminally responsible. In the past, the RIAA/MPAA have won lawsuits against people with open Wi-Fi systems for facilitating copyright infringement, and it wouldn't be surprising to see action (criminal/civil) taken against the library for a remote user's activities.

      I feel like a troll for posting this, but there is a good chance the library will be the worse off for doing this.

    12. Re:Bullshit ... by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I spent two weeks in Germany in June/July, mainly Berlin and Dresden. I REALLY liked the place. I'm not saying it's perfect, but it's definitely a country that I would not hesitate moving to if given the opportunity.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    13. Re:Bullshit ... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Ah, we see how people dive in to defend the establishment by likening an anti-establishment candidate to the Nazis.

      Trump and Sanders have the most important thing in common: they'll actually change something if elected.

      Unless Congress gets flushed good and hard, that statement is highly unlikely.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    14. Re:Bullshit ... by wwphx · · Score: 0

      "Change is certain, progress is not." Then again, I was called "a progressive" by a conservative idiot who had problems understanding that things can't stay the same, and if you don't move forward, you're going to fall backwards. You can't stay in the same place for very long.

      I'd like to think that Bernie has a chance at getting elected, I'll be happy if he succeeds in altering the discussion. But since he's a socialist, just like Obama (according to "well informed" friends), I don't think he stands a chance.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    15. Re:Bullshit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like Obama

      Obama's probably the least socialist socialist we've seen since mister Clinton.

      Bernie Sanders is straight up socialist and has both the label and the voting history to prove it. At a political level I'd rather he not win, but at a personal level, having something approaching honesty in a politician is itself something new and exciting, and would certainly beat every other election I've been old enough to vote in where I get to choose between a liar and a fraud.

    16. Re:Bullshit ... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I think he (like Trump, and Carson) has the best chance in the past 40 years. Non-establishment candidates have been weeded out as "unelectable" for as long as I've been alive. Now we have a self-described socialist on the left, and two guys with no political history on the right, leading the polls. It's a hopeful sign. And all three of these guys are more honest about their positions than we've seen in some time. (Trump's a bit random and inconsistent, but no one thinks otherwise, and he clearly says whatever's on his mind at the moment.)

      At this point, if we somehow still end up with a Clinton v Bush race, we'll know the fix is in.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    17. Re:Bullshit ... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      They aren't secret. You just can't be told what they are because you are a terrorist.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    18. Re:Bullshit ... by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      gstoddart -- while I normally agree with your increasingly cynical and bitter rants, I have to disagree here. Fourteen years ago may be the last big nail in the coffin, but it started long before.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    19. Re:Bullshit ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Ah, we see how people dive in to defend the establishment by likening an anti-establishment candidate to the Nazis.

      You think billionaire Donald Trump is the "anti-establishment candidate"? You believe he wants to upset the status quo? It never once occurred to you that a guy who's the product of an inheritance and expensive marketing might just be saying shit he thinks knuckleheads like you want to hear?

      Trump and Sanders have the most important thing in common: they'll actually change something if elected.

      You dummy. The only thing Donald Trump will change if he's elected is the name of the White House. For his entire career, he's given financial support to the most mainstream, establishment candidates from both parties. And now you believe he's some renegade who's going to upset the apple cart.

      You really don't have the sense you were born with, do you?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:Bullshit ... by fnj · · Score: 1

      Unless Congress gets flushed good and hard, that statement [that change can be effected by a President] is highly unlikely.

      Are you joking? If we have learned ANYTHING from the last 8 years (and I have my doubts that "we" have, if "we" means the imbecile electorate), it is that Congress couldn't stop a wet paper bag if the President threw it at them. President Obama has changed plenty. The ACA is just one of the changes he brought, massive as it is. Anything he HASN'T changed, and there is plenty (closing Gitmo as a lock-up facility (so far, but stay tuned), reigning in DHS and TSA and NSA, etc, etc) are things he either doesn't really oppose, or is unwilling to make a big enough effort.

      Congress could go home tomorrow and stay there forever for all the effect they have on anything. The USA has finally finished transforming itself from a Republic into a dictatorship of the executive - minus (so far) throwing away the show of the Presidential elections every 4 years.

    21. Re:Bullshit ... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hope the library board sends back a big fuck you like librarians sometimes do

      We're rallying outside the library on Tuesday to show our support for the Trustees and to let them know that the People support them. 80 Main St. West Lebanon, 6PM, for anybody north of Boston (2 hrs) who'd like to participate. RSVP if you're on Facebook.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re:Bullshit ... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      "through groups of citizens harassing anyone who departs from the groupthink."

      That's always been the historical norm. The idea of tolerating dissenting ideas has really only existed since the Enlightenment, and even then only in certain cultures, and even the only sporadically. In most historical cultures and many current cultures, there are actual laws that allow for heretics to be punished.

    23. Re:Bullshit ... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      And what reasons do you have for not running a Tor node yourself?

      Lack of bandwidth mostly, though I used to run a freenet node.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    24. Re:Bullshit ... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Ah, same Ratzo as always.

      Maybe this is all just a cunning web of lies by Trump: could be possible, but honestly I'm not sure he's bright enough to keep it straight. Whatever passes through his head seems to come straight out his mouth unfiltered.

      He's anti-establishment on amnesty, giving Iran the O-Bomb, taxing billionaires, and that's just the big-ticket items. He's paid-to-play in the past, but he's openly antagonistic to the whole current corrupt pay-for-play system. Hell, I'd bet he'd even reduce government spending by eliminating an agency or two that annoyed him. The GOPe is having a fit over him.

      Really, I think his mouth will get him out of the primary, but I've been wrong about that for months, so maybe people are ready for anyone who's angry at the establishment.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    25. Re:Bullshit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's legal, and there are legitimate uses for it ... but we're going to list off a bunch of scary hypotheticals, and insinuate how you'd be responsible for everything on the planet.

      These people need to talk to someone who works on the floor at a city library. One of the many things they have to do is eject and possibly report to police people who watch porn and ultaviolent videos on the free computers. When they do these things in front of the children who are dropped off there for 'free baby sitting' by poor parents it becomes a serious criminal offense. (Yet somehow it doesn't stop them from getting their pornography fix in public.)

      How do they think that tor will auto-magically make these activities easier or less detectable? The pages and libraries are physically there. I might guess this is another example of politician-detached-from-reality thinking. If the only library you've ever seen has been in a private home or wealthy University you might not know things like how often horny men are kicked out for watching smut in front of toddlers.

      Sadly this is probably some group with election votes on their minds instead of what is actually good for their constituents. Drumming up votes with fear and hate has been going on long before Hitler and fascists.

      Libraries are not empty warehouses in abandoned industrial parks or private drug houses run in the middle of a neighborhood that are under-policed. The people guarding the gates are right there. All the time. It's something our taxes pay for and it's a service we rightly get.

    26. Re:Bullshit ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is all just a cunning web of lies by Trump: could be possible, but honestly I'm not sure he's bright enough to keep it straight.

      So, the man you claim isn't "bright enough" to be cunning is bright enough to have a coherent set of policies?

      But it does explain why you'd support him.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    27. Re: Bullshit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has any President in the past twenty years or so done any better ?

    28. Re:Bullshit ... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Oh, I never said he had a coherent set of anything. He has anger, and an apparent inability to filter his mouth, and I approve of the chaos he'd cause in DC. Like I said, random change is almost certainly an improvement.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    29. Re:Bullshit ... by firewrought · · Score: 1

      Even random change is very likely to be for the better.

      Um, no. Even with all our problems, things could be much worse than they currently are. Medicine is vastly overpriced, for instance, but we don't have the health catastrophes of Africa. Religious zealots hold substantial political sway, but it's not like the middle east. There aren't enough jobs, but conditions are generally safe and nothing like the borderline-slavery of China. Even compared to the more equitable democracies of western Europe, we do pretty well, with the U.S. ranking #6 in the OECD's quality of life index.

      Keep in mind that humans have been at the mercy of disease, famine, genocide, war, and various other forms of barbarianism throughout the bulk of history. We can get back there with the right mix of corruption, injustice, and boneheaded policy moves. Things can easily be made much, much worse.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    30. Re: Bullshit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are an asshole.

      What yo said was fully correct except you lowered yourself to the level of a 2 year old by personally insulting the person you were responding to.

      This is the first time I've ever called a person an asshole in a web comment but you own it. The reason we're all screwed is because people like you can't dignify a person with a thoughtful response without belittling or personally insulting another person. For this you are the pond scum that prevents productive conversation that could actually solve our problems.

      Now goto the timeout corner for 5 minutes then come back and give the person you just insulted the public apology you owe them.

    31. Re:Bullshit ... by lgw · · Score: 1

      We already live in a totalitarian state with omnipresent surveillance, searches without cause, seizures without trial, and a government whose budget consists chiefly of taking money from the politically disfavored and giving it to the politically favored. Sure, most places have it worse, no argument there. But "worse" is mostly in the direction we're already heading! A different direction is likely to be better. It almost has to be better than the leading establishment newspaper calling out the troublesome Jews on which to blame our problems (at least they eventually found a sense of embarrassment about that - a sign there's still time to change course).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    32. Re:Bullshit ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      He has anger, and an apparent inability to filter his mouth, and I approve of the chaos he'd cause in DC. Like I said, random change is almost certainly an improvement.

      Maybe. That chaos could also easily throw us into overt fascism. Remember, our civil institutions are becoming increasingly secondary to the corporate ones.

      If government goes to hell, who do you think is going to step into the vacuum that creates? It ain't gonna be Thomas fucking Jefferson.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    33. Re: Bullshit ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      This is the first time I've ever called a person an asshole in a web comment

      Don't worry, it gets easier.

      Remember: progress not perfection.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    34. Re:Bullshit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It reminds me of Librarians vs Patriot Act

    35. Re:Bullshit ... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      True, we are balanced on a knife edge.

    36. Re:Bullshit ... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Remember, our civil institutions are becoming increasingly secondary to the corporate ones

      I just think we're already going that way as fast as we practically can (you can't boil the frog too fast, or he'll notice), and thus change is likely for the better.

      Anyway, I think it's more likely that we'll see Bernie vs Carson, unless Trump is actually capable of learning and changing his ways (in which case, I might actually like him, but I doubt it). Can you imagine? A presidential election involving national debate on the issues? I'd like to see it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    37. Re:Bullshit ... by doccus · · Score: 1

      I uploaded the first episode of the "world at war" that I'm pretty sure I got from archive.org , as a reminder of what started WW2, now that we're entering WW3 on the same trumped up and flimsy evidence. Within 5 minutes I was already served with a notice and my video blocked, despite the fact that the episode had been online for 15 years elsewhere and it has apparently been given the all clear as available. Seems it has been re-copyrighted and they want nobody to see it. It's only the first episode I had trouble with, the one that explains how everybody in Germany got suckered into changing that country from democracy into dictatorship .

    38. Re:Bullshit ... by doccus · · Score: 1

      Ah, we see how people dive in to defend the establishment by likening an anti-establishment candidate to the Nazis.

      Trump and Sanders have the most important thing in common: they'll actually change something if elected. And at this point, even random change is very likely to be for the better Both of them are leading in the primary polls as well, which is a great sign that voters finally want real change, not just for their team to win the big game.

      Trump and Sanders will do precisely NOTHING if elected. If there's any serious chance they will, they'll get the same support John and Bobby Kennedy did..

    39. Re:Bullshit ... by doccus · · Score: 1

      Unless Congress gets flushed good and hard, that statement [that change can be effected by a President] is highly unlikely.

      Are you joking? If we have learned ANYTHING from the last 8 years (and I have my doubts that "we" have, if "we" means the imbecile electorate), it is that Congress couldn't stop a wet paper bag if the President threw it at them. President Obama has changed plenty. The ACA is just one of the changes he brought, massive as it is. Anything he HASN'T changed, and there is plenty (closing Gitmo as a lock-up facility (so far, but stay tuned), reigning in DHS and TSA and NSA, etc, etc) are things he either doesn't really oppose, or is unwilling to make a big enough effort.

      Congress could go home tomorrow and stay there forever for all the effect they have on anything. The USA has finally finished transforming itself from a Republic into a dictatorship of the executive - minus (so far) throwing away the show of the Presidential elections every 4 years.

      OK, perhaps he should have qualified that by saying if there's any POSITIVE changes not supported by the invisible power structure. Sure, Obama has changed plenty.. for THE WORSE. If, for instance, he had wanted tor reinstate the constitutional changes that Bush had first tampered with, instead of completely stripping them, he would never have been able to. Or, the same, in fact, if he had tried to implement even one of his original campaign promises from 2008.

    40. Re:Bullshit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "well, as long as it's to stop terrorists, or drug dealers, or kiddie fiddlers ..."

      Hey, there are some very talented violin players under the age of 18!

      If it's to stop kiddie accordionists, though, I say stop 'em early.

    41. Re:Bullshit ... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yep, I used to run an exit node but now I just run a bridge node. Exit nodes go into the web's leper colony. There are even newspaper sites with no commenting features that will ban your IP.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    42. Re:Bullshit ... by evansvillelinux · · Score: 1

      God I'm so sick of this bullshit:

      DHS spokesman Shawn Neudauer said the agent was simply providing "visibility/situational awareness," and did not have any direct contact with the Lebanon police or library. "The use of a Tor browser is not, in [or] of itself, illegal and there are legitimate purposes for its use,"

      It's legal, and there are legitimate uses for it ... but we're going to list off a bunch of scary hypotheticals, and insinuate how you'd be responsible for everything on the planet. I hope the library board sends back a big fuck you like librarians sometimes do ... give up the right to anonymity on the notion that it might might lead to something bad is the argument of cowards and fascists. No matter what anybody likes to think, the US stopped being a free country or a champion of liberty and democracy 14 years ago. And you'll never get it back.

      The problem this library (and others) will run in to is the threat of lost funding if they continue the Tor project. Library budgets are already tight so the lost of ANY funding can be devastating. It's the only reason most libraries installed web filtering software.

      --
      IMHO, IANAL, TINLA, etc...
    43. Re:Bullshit ... by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      The public cannot be told what the charges are either because the charges are from a law which is a state secret.

    44. Re:Bullshit ... by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      You may want to change that 14 years ago to 100 years ago or more.

  4. McDonalds, Starbucks, et. al. by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    So how is this any different than someone using the free and open wifi at a Starbucks, McDonalds, Flying J truck stop, etc? Just as anonymous ...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    1. Re:McDonalds, Starbucks, et. al. by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Only criminals want anonymity ... you want anonymity ... Citizen, why are you planning criminal activity?

      You'll need to come along with us for questioning. Papers please, comrade.

      This is a shady security department reaching out to a small town police force to make a "suggestion" to the library about all of the evils which could ensue.

      That's about as completely scary as you can imagine, really. Freedom can be taken away with veiled innuendo by an agency who claims to be just pointing this stuff out.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:McDonalds, Starbucks, et. al. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even Tor bro?

    3. Re:McDonalds, Starbucks, et. al. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the DHS or local authorities were smart, they would LET this happen... I mean you just watch who uses those Tor enabled computers and keep a log or take pics.

      Any SMART criminal would never bother to use these. Easier to use directional wifi and free public hotspots!

    4. Re:McDonalds, Starbucks, et. al. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      When everything is illegal, unless expressly deemed legal, then you will understand. We already live in a tyranny, it just isn't a dictatorship ... yet.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    5. Re:McDonalds, Starbucks, et. al. by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      GLORY TO AMERITOTZKA!

    6. Re:McDonalds, Starbucks, et. al. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. should not criticize anonymity blocking by DHS since /. itself forbids you from posting messages via public proxy servers which means they can log the IP address of all posters, anonymous or not. Mark this submission as hypocritical.

  5. Subject-less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why we can't have nice things....

  6. But what about the books? by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Do they let people read the books in the library without checking them out?

    Even the atomic physics books? Why, someone could learn how to make an ATOMIC BOMB from those.

    Do you want to be responsible for that? You better require everyone entering the Library to ask you for the book, so that we can track it.

    Also, some of those art books have necked ladies in them. Better give them all to me, so I can make them safe for everyone.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:But what about the books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the proper spelling is "nekkid".

    2. Re:But what about the books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I could relate the saga of an interview with the FBI in the late '60s after a friend and I tried to get books on infrared-viewing equipment at a public library. This was in the days of "starlight scopes" being used over in a little country in SE Asia. Rather an unpleasant experience.

    3. Re:But what about the books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to his spell checker

    4. Re:But what about the books? by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      Do you want to be responsible for that? You better require everyone entering the Library to ask you for the book, so that we can track it.

      We had better start requiring registration for callers 911 as well, since the police are now being used as a weapon via swatting attacks.

    5. Re:But what about the books? by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      They are already working on that: FCC May Stop 911 Access For NSI Phones http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    6. Re:But what about the books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do it, instead of insinuating.

    7. Re:But what about the books? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, imagine the calamity criminals could cause if they used ROADS.

      Better shut down all the public streets and highways, you know, just to "be safe."

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  7. Re:Will somebody... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The judge and my therapist says I shouldn't think of the children so much.

  8. Forks and knives.. by mgandalf · · Score: 1

    could well be used by the criminal organization to torture and/or murder fellow citizens. Therefore I say we should ban the use of all forks and knives until proper surveillance on forks and knives can be obtained. I'm tired of putting forks and knives into the hands of our criminals!

    1. Re:Forks and knives.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The airlines are way ahead of you.

    2. Re:Forks and knives.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know who sells sharp knives for cheap? WalMart does! We should shut them down as well just in case - evil people out there!

    3. Re:Forks and knives.. by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Forks and knives

      What about pointed sticks and rocks? Better put those under lock and key, too. How about martial arts? All martial arts are designed to turn the human body into a weapon for killing other human beings, so we'd better make all of those illegal, too. All vehicles, including bicycles, can be employed to injure or kill people. Better outlaw those, too. In fact let's outlaw everything because almost any object can be used to injure or kill another human being. Water is a prime candidate here, you can drown someone with water! Better outlaw water, too.

      Why not just go to the source? Humans are troublesome and hurt other humans; better just lock up all humans from birth to death, and keep them under guard and surveillance 24/7/365, to ensure they're not harming anyone or getting into any trouble. There, problem solved!

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  9. Isn't FUD just the best thing ever? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    So very effective is the appeal to animal instinct... The reasonable person hasn't a chance in this world.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  10. Live Free or Die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Die(slowly) it is, then.

  11. TOR SMASH!!! by KatchooNJ · · Score: 0

    Fear the Tor! "TOR SMASH!!!"

    Yeah... maybe I recently watched Plan 9. heh

    --
    "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
  12. Pencil by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    Just because you can stab someone with a pencil doesn't mean that's its only use.

    Did you know they let you have pencils on planes?!

    US highways are used to commit crimes every day would closing all the off ramps fix that?

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  13. Libraries today, Post Offices tomiorrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing I don't live in Lebanon, but I can understand what with the PLA and Arafat causing all those problems for their kosher neighbours to the south.

    1. Re:Libraries today, Post Offices tomiorrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could have been worse, this could have happened in Freedom, NH.

  14. It's quite simple really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government declared war on privacy long ago, and if you make any legitimate attempt to do so they show up at your door demanding papers please.

  15. So what happened to by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    "Live Free or Die?"

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:So what happened to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Live Free or Succumb to National Security Fearmongering" doesn't fit on a license plate

    2. Re:So what happened to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It died.

  16. Kitchen knives can kill. I had government training by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    Yet we allow kitchen knives. And we allow people to use fire, and carry fire-starters.

  17. The terrorists have won by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The terrorists have won. They now have us so frightened that we are being forced to give up our liberties and our freedom. And the odd part is that the very organization that is supposed to be protecting us against the terrorists, the TSA, has become the terrorists' weapon of choice against us..

    1. Re:The terrorists have won by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      I said that many years ago.

      9/11 helped cement the rape of the constitution.

    2. Re:The terrorists have won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The terrorists are the power elite.

      They are winning, because people aren't thinking.

    3. Re: The terrorists have won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I felt at the time that 9/11 was not done without background American complicity. The rush to totalitarianism was accelerated tenfold.

    4. Re:The terrorists have won by fnj · · Score: 2

      Snort. Yes, "the terrorists" have won, but no, they haven't "forced" us to do anything. They finessed us into doing it to ourselves. They have essentially turned our own governing apparatus into a fifth column. I wouldn't give them any exaggerated credit for cleverness. Our governing apparatus has been rotting and growing perverted for a long time. "The terrorists" didn't employ any great insight or clever methods. They just gave the pile of shit a slight push in the obvious direction.

    5. Re:The terrorists have won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Terrorists" won? You sure they were ever in the running?
      At this point, it's fairly clear that the terrorists were just the excuse. The 363 pages did not write themselves in a mere 2-3 weeks.

  18. Lobotomies for everyone! by mveloso · · Score: 2

    Did you know that criminals can use their brains to come up with crimes! The public should be lobotomized so criminality will be impossible!

    1. Re:Lobotomies for everyone! by SpockLogic · · Score: 1

      Did you know that criminals can use their brains to come up with crimes! The public should be lobotomized so criminality will be impossible!

      Watching Fox News is more effective than a lobotomy.

    2. Re:Lobotomies for everyone! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Did you know that criminals can use their brains to come up with crimes! The public should be lobotomized so criminality will be impossible!

      Watching any corporate media outlet is more effective than a lobotomy.

      FTFY

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re: Lobotomies for everyone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Fox News reporters are only partially lobotomized. The other mainstream media have receivers implanted in their brains. It hurts a lot when they try to think for themselves.

  19. Coalition by surd1618 · · Score: 1

    Would it work out any better if a large number of libraries turned on exit nodes all at once?

  20. Not to play Devl's Advocate, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Have you ever actually looked at the traffic from a Tor Exit Node? It's pretty much exactly what the DHS is claiming it is. Yes there are legitimate uses for Tor, but let's be honest here, what the overwhelming majority of Tor uses are using Tor for is not good things.

    1. Re:Not to play Devl's Advocate, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's better for a guilty man to walk free...

  21. Porn Is Not A Crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she was concerned about the service’s association with criminal activities such as pornography and drug trafficking.

    *facepalm*

  22. So... by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Only criminals or those planning to be criminals (i.e. no right-minded American/<your nationality>) want to use anonymizing technology.

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or those wanting to protect themselves from criminals.

  23. In unrelated news... by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In unrelated news, after a visit by DHS, Home Depot decided to voluntarily stop carrying crowbars, bolt cutters, saws, boxcutters and hand tools of all kinds after learning that these tools can be attractive to criminal enterprises or actors. The use of a crowbar is not, in [or] of itself, illegal and there are legitimate purposes for its use. When asked for comment, a Home Depot manager said that when she learned about the illicit uses for tools at the meeting with the police and general contractors, she was concerned about the company's association with criminal activities such as burglary and even murder.

    1. Re:In unrelated news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can this be modded 'funny'? It's downright frightening, and not far off the mark (buying a rattle-can of paint is already a pain in the ass). Someone with points needs to mod this 'insightful'.

  24. BREAKING: NH Highways Enable Police Evasion by CanEHdian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    New Hampshire (AP) - According to several reports and eye witness accounts, confirmed by the Department of Homeland Security, New Hampshire roads and highways have been used by thieves in getaway vehicles to evade police efforts to apprehend them. Sources near the NH governors' office report a decree to close roads and highways are going to be closed to vehicular traffic indefinitely could be in effect as early as today. Story will be updated with further developments.

    --
    When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
  25. Re:Will somebody... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so funny - isn't that _How_ you get in trouble?!

    CAP = receptor

  26. Roll anonaminity out by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    But don't tell the press.

  27. Hopenchange!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    <JediMindTrick>This really is the hope and change you're looking for.</JediMindTrick>

    1. Re:Hopenchange!!! by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      <SithMindTrick>This really is the hope and change you're looking for.</SithMindTrick>

      ftfy

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  28. Missed Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could have just kept up a user log with a security camera installed to "prevent theft".

  29. Hence Their Motto by Fluffymuffin+Cocobut · · Score: 1

    Hence New Hampshire's motto: "Live Under Constant Surveillance of America's Security Apparatus or Die". New Hampshire is as pro-government, anti-freedom as any state in the union.

    --
    imagine a soft, buttery paw gently pressing down onto a sleeping soldier's face. forever.
  30. Calling Mr. Bradbury by Tokolosh · · Score: 2

    Time to update Fahrenheit 451.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:Calling Mr. Bradbury by wonkavader · · Score: 1

      451 is not about censorship. It is about television, as Mr. Bradbury himself explained.

      In F451 they're not burning SOME books, they're burning ALL BOOKS. If you wrote a book saying how wonderful the government was, they'd burn THAT. That's not censorship, that's removing competition.

  31. Issue: Filtering Requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Use of a Tor Browser could also cause issues as far as requirements under the Children's Internet Protection Act and other federal level laws which mandate the use of filters in order to receive federal grants (USF and LSTA). If the Library doesn't receive federal grants covering Internet, then it's probably easy peasy (they just have to manually ensure no one is viewing material "harmful to minors".

    Personally, I love the idea... but it clashes greatly with the needs for monies to actually run the libraries.

  32. Possible responses I would have made by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    "Psst - we're setting up a honeypot!"
    "We did it because we get a lot of ex-husbands logging on here."
    "Gee - you mean .onion isn't that new top level domain for satire?"

  33. Re:Will somebody... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Next up Civil Liberties and how they protect criminals....

  34. I hopt the do. by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I hope they vote to turn it back on Sept 15th. Fuck, they SHOULD turn it back on.

  35. Why not turn off the internet too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since it can be used to do the same thing?

    This security theatre is BS.

  36. ... pending a vote of the board of trustees by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They ultimately decided to suspend the project, pending a vote of the library board of trustees on Sept. 15.

    So a library manager made a decision, that decision generated some contention (for better or worse) and so the matter is submitted it to democratic decision making by the proper authority. If there's a story here, it's what and how the library board of trustees decides and who tries to influence that decision.

    Heck, for all we know the board might enthusiastically endorse the project. But seriously /. couldn't wait those 4 days to find out the decision.

    1. Re:... pending a vote of the board of trustees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It lets us discuss it twice. Now and in two weeks when some blog covers the trustee meeting.

      (It makes sense from the viewpoint of /. as a business. More page views)

    2. Re:... pending a vote of the board of trustees by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      Hey, the board did enthusiastically endorse the project.

      I'm sure everyone flailing their arms around wildly will acknowledge their overreaction and adjust accordingly right?

  37. Public streets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "HS spokesman Shawn Neudauer said the agent was simply providing "visibility/situational awareness," and did not have any direct contact with the Lebanon police or library. "The use of a public street is not, in [or] of itself, illegal and there are legitimate purposes for its use," Neudauer said, "However, the protections that a public street offers can be attractive to criminal enterprises or actors and HSI [Homeland Security Investigations] will continue to pursue those individuals who seek to use the public streets to further their illicit activity." ...Deputy City Manager Paula Maville said that when she learned about public streets at the meeting with the police and the librarians, she was concerned about the service’s association with criminal activities such as sex and drug trafficking. "That is a concern from a public relations perspective and we wanted to get those concerns on the table," she said."

    Does this properly illuminate the ridiculousness of these claims against anonymizing services, encryption, and other privacy-enabling technologies? Does this finally make it clear that anything can be used for both good or ill intent, and just because it can be used for bad things doesn't mean we shouldn't still have it?

  38. My road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The road in front of my house could be used by criminals and such, so my neighbors and I have started to pull it apart. We'll be the first neighborhood in America to actually be safe from criminal elements using our roads to shop for groceries or commit crimes or whatever bad people do.

    btw, I have a car for sale.

  39. Sign the letter of protest in support of effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The EFF has a letter you can sign in order to show your support and counter this boogyman fearmongering of DHS:

    https://act.eff.org/action/support-tor-and-intellectual-freedom-in-libraries

    I signed it. Then I blogged about it. See thinkpenguin.com/blog. Will you help get the word out about this campaign?

  40. A poor bargain by cybersquid · · Score: 2

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin I was tempted to post anonymously...

  41. Pornography? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when is pornography a criminial activity?

  42. Re:Roll anonaminity [sic] out by fnj · · Score: 1

    "Anonaminity". LOL.

  43. Stop thought-crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the local police department received an email from the Department of Homeland Security

    ... Warning them about the hippies and subversives apparently employed at the local library. This is no different to the FBI demonizing every group that wasn't white and rich, or silent and politically conservative.

    The police then met with city officials and discussed all the ways criminals could make use of the relay.

    I doubt the police go to the car salesrooms and tell people there all the crimes that can be committed with cars. This is the state of the world today: Refusing to empower people because it also enables criminal behaviour. That leads to world where the elite and moral majority makes all choices and the citizenry make none: Totalitarianism.

  44. You joke, but... by almechist · · Score: 1

    could well be used by the criminal organization to torture and/or murder fellow citizens. Therefore I say we should ban the use of all forks and knives until proper surveillance on forks and knives can be obtained. I'm tired of putting forks and knives into the hands of our criminals!

    Hah! You've ironically brought up one of my personal pet peeves of the post 9/11 era. In my area of the country at least, I kid you not, sometime after 9/11 the local supermarkets and Walmart all stopped selling boxes of plastic knives. Really! You could not buy a box of regular plastic picnic-type knives. I eventually discovered you could get them as part of an assorted plastic eating utensil package, but plastic knives on their own by the box were out! You could not buy them, anywhere. I tried asking the staff at various stores what was going on, but all of them claimed to know nothing about any ban. The fact remained that boxes of plastic knives were no longer being stocked, just spoons and forks. I had to buy the assorted boxes just to have knives at all, it was crazy! This behavior seems to have finally changed only in the last few years, since most places now seem once again to have boxes of plastic knives... But WTF!!! What was the point of the ban, FFS??? It remains a complete mystery to me. I mean, you could always get metal knives at these stores, really sharp ones, even! Just not plastic, not on their own. Very weird. This country definitely lost a good part of its sanity and common sense following the 9/11 attacks. I can only hope that eventually common sense, like the ubiquitous plastic knife, will once again return to the good old USA. Don't hold your breath, though.

  45. It all has to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tor?? Hell, the terrorists use the internet even without it. Internet has to go.

    Cars... getaway cars... car bombs... gotta go. Time to get those fat asses walking again anyway.

    Trucks... you see terrorists riding in the back of trucks with AK-47s and RPGs. Gotta go.

    Baseball bats... gotta go. Hockey sticks look pretty dangerous too.

    Airplanes! 9/11. Airplanes have legal uses, but they have to go. Instruments of death and destruction.

    Balaclavas, knives, guns... yes guns!! Better get rid of all those. They have legal uses, but bad people like to use them too, so they have to go.

    America is going to be the safest place on Earth!

  46. 'Criminal Activities' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "about the serviceâ(TM)s association with criminal activities such as pornography and drug trafficking."

    How is porn related to 'criminal activities' ?

  47. So... set up a library-only Tor network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If all libraries with public access computers set up their own Tor network, it would preserve anonymity while removing all the objections raised here.

  48. All the ways cars can be used illegally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder if the town would outlaw cars if you explained to them how cars are often used by people to travel to a place to commit a crime and then use it to leave, and use it to get away form the police....