Slashdot Mirror


Vint Cerf Wants Help Figuring Out the Future of the Internet and Communications

dkatana writes: Vint Cerf, one of the original creators of today's internet, wrote a letter asking everyone to participate to create the foundation of the next internet. He said, "As communication forms evolve, it will be important to preserve one of the oldest: the letter, which has been critical in building relationships, conducting business and governmental affairs, and preserving history. Rather than sounding the death knell for meaningful, written correspondence, Internet technology has the power to enhance it." Cerf cites Doris Kearns Goodwin's book Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln as a perfect example of what might not be possible for historians of the next generation. Goodwin pieced together letters written by President Lincoln and his cabinet to write a book about how they interacted. "In the case of Doris Kearns Goodwin, the letters were 140 years old, and I would guess that digital content that was created 10 years ago won't be accessible 10 years from now," said Cerf. "We have the media around, but you may not be able to read it."

73 comments

  1. We got it from here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks Vint!

    1. Re:We got it from here by davester666 · · Score: 1

      I guess even the NSA posts as AC.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  2. We could always convert from one format to the nex by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    The biggest impediment however is the fact that *EVERYTHING* is protected by copyright, so historical preservation risks getting you hit by a lawsuit.

  3. Figure out how to keep the NSA out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be nice if everyday communications between people was not easily snoopable by governments, coporations, etc. Things like e-mail, converstaitons, and browsing should be private between the parties involved. Other than that, I would say that the current network is pretty good. Basically, stick to the original intent of making the network a place where people can freely exchange information without fear of censorship and oppressive regimes.

    1. Re:Figure out how to keep the NSA out. by bmo · · Score: 1

      end-to-end encryption that is transparent to the user.

      Encryption right now is in a shambles from the user's POV - a bewildering array of tools and standards, and if you want everything encrypted, you have to cobble all this together from different sources. Encryption before transport that is invisible to the user (much like https, but more - email, files, everything) is the key to keeping good intentioned government (on the paved road to hell) and oppressive regimes both from fucking up communications and privacy.

      Basically what Bruce Schneier has been preaching for over a decade.

      Vint should talk to Bruce.

      --
      BMO

    2. Re:Figure out how to keep the NSA out. by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      End to end encryption is fundamentally incompatible with historical archives. Copyright and DRM will eventually lead to some, easily duplicable works of art being lost forever because the servers are shutdown and encryption keys not released.

      E2E encryption is the same - it working is *fundamentally* about the death of archival.

  4. Integrated government backdoor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    To help secure our freedom in these trying times.

    1. Re:Integrated government backdoor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant! Where did you ever come up with such an idea?

  5. the Internet AND Communications? by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    this might take a while.

  6. Not Readable in 10 years by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Damn I guess all these Scriptsit files that are 35 years old shouldn't be readable

    Wait they are readable

    Oh maybe I need to toss these word perfect files

    Nope still readable

    Corel Draw files ? Still readable

    Vellum files ? nope still readable

    SPICE simulation files ? Still work

    P-Cap still works.

    Seems crying doom is getting to be more and more popular all the time.

    1. Re: Not Readable in 10 years by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you had to transfer them to new media in order to keep them readable, something the government should be doing with their files but have already gotten creative about at least pretending they have gone missing and other shenanigans.

    2. Re: Not Readable in 10 years by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Lego Punch Card Reader

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Likely adaptable to Jacquard Loom cards.

    3. Re:Not Readable in 10 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to say something like this. I have digital files 40 years old I can still read. Why? (1) I've moved them forward from machine to machine as hardware and OSs changed, and (2) I was forward looking enough to use unencumbered, non-proprietary formats to store things in.

      If you lock up your data behind single-vendor opaque formats and in cloud-owned storage, well, yeah, you're probably screwed if you want your data in 10 years.

    4. Re: Not Readable in 10 years by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      How well do punchcards have to be kept in order to ensure they aren't damaged in a way that makes them unreadable. Has anybody studied this? Hanging chads? Data density? Not that the government would adopt it as a backup storage device, though.... How fast is the search function. I recently discovered that records from the Nixon Administration are online at http://2001-2009.state.gov/r/p... but that's probably a little off topic.

    5. Re: Not Readable in 10 years by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      I don't know, the point of comparison though is 140 year old letters that had to be pieced back together.

  7. wiretapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about an internet that isn't illegally wiretapped by the NSA?

    Just kidding, who believes in that?

    1. Re:wiretapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Build an internet with built-in encryption and source verification on every step!
      You'll have absolutely NO anonymity, but hey! You'll know if the NSA tries to read your (encrypted) mail.

  8. Old media's big advantage by marcle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It isn't just about the technical problem of how to preserve/read digital information.

    Back in the day (get off my lawn!) it took a lot more thought and planning to create a document, without instant digital editing etc. Those old letters, books, et. al., took a lot more time and effort to create, and were considerably more difficult to edit and modify, and as a result, tended to have more forethought and planning before putting words down.

    As a result, penning a few paragraphs or an essay or two wasn't such a casual endeavor as it is today.

    Now that any monkey with a keyboard (and a little cut-and-paste ability) can create volumes of prose, the signal to noise ratio is a lot lower. IMHO, we don't want or need to preserve every piece of text (or image) ever created. The problem is, how do we tell the signal from the noise?

    Even if we were able to preserve all digital information across time, nimbly leaping from one format or platform to another, would we want to? And if we did, what a vast amount of garbage! Might as well preserve all our landfills, in case future historians have a desperate need to pick thru them...

    Of course, the NSA is probably already doing this, and has just the search algorithm to target YOU, citizen!

    1. Re:Old media's big advantage by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

      To be fair, today's archeologist dig through the garbage dumps from aeons ago. Don't doubt for an instant future archeologist won't be doing the same to the garbage dumps of today.

      Not to mention it is insanely tricky to decide today what will be relevant in the future. I have a book of graffiti from Pompeii. That probably gives me more insight into the times there than any official account.

      The standard-bearer is that people will preserve what's important to them (including the means of accessing it. You do have a few DOS floppies stashed, right?), disregarding any copyright law (and thank god a few copies of Nosferatu escaped destruction), and preservation becomes democratized, for better or worse (I do long for the web of yesteryear). There is strength in numbers.

      Or corporate interest win out and digital mediums are only accessed and licensed, but never owned, and unless they develop perfect storage; everything developed becomes a blackhole.

      Right now, we are somewhere in-between.

    2. Re:Old media's big advantage by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how many of my bookmarks I have changed to point to Archive.org's newest page before the site got deleted. Even some of those, Archive didn't get the site's content completely, but sometimes going to older versions yields more material.
      https://web.archive.org/web/20... is a good example of the loss of data issue.

    3. Re:Old media's big advantage by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      A language teacher that I had did his thesis on ancient Roman graffiti and said the same thing.

  9. VC wrote a letter by JSG · · Score: 1

    "Vint Cerf ... wrote a letter ..."

    No he didn't, he wrote a lettr. I'd never seen one of those things before now but it appears to be another Twattr, Wankr or Tossr style meeja platform but with nicer fonts.

    A letter is not broadcast across the world but is a slow, expensive point to point medium. It also requires effort, paper, pens (or possibly crayons), some saliva, an envelope, a stamp and some legwork to post it. I used to be a prolific letter writer and loved to send and receive them many years ago.

    Those days are past now. Shame really. The world turns.

    1. Re:VC wrote a letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thx 2 writing for only getting btr since then. I 3 the web and how ez it is to talk now.

    2. Re:VC wrote a letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and this is something else that's wrong with the internet. This guy wants us to join yet another website to send him a "lettr", doesn't he have email, the bastard?

    3. Re:VC wrote a letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're missing a <

    4. Re:VC wrote a letter by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I still write letters from time to time, and postcards when I travel. In particular, I seldom send emails to my daughter, preferring to *write* to her.

      It's not just about having the right glyphs reproduced in the right order. It's also about her having something that came from her father's hands, just for her.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  10. At my humble opinion... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 2

    The single biggest problem with the current internet, beside the technical things is this protocol has been designed for peer to peer networking and the Internet has been build as a server centric IBM mainframe SNA network.The fear to really democratize the internet and empower the users has result into this lame architecture where almost everything in this world converge into two dozen datacenters. The data has been made the property of a bunch of happy fews and made them immensely riches. The Internet has not played its role as it should have.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
    1. Re:At my humble opinion... by JSG · · Score: 2

      Beg your pardon daddyo! Peer to peer? I'm writing a reply to someone who could be anywhere in the world, that can be viewed by same. I don't see anything remotely SNA related (I've worked with the real thing - it's more stable).

      At a whim I can use another platform, any platform that will allow me to login and participate, to communicate with a vast number of people. Yes, there are the big ones: the FBs and Twitters of the world. However they come and go. I also use mailing lists and was a fan of USENET some time ago.

      The internet *is* hugely democratised for the likes of you and I. Perhaps not for people in many countries and that is a shame and we must continue to try and develop and deliver technologies and methodologies that might enable those who aspire to the luxury of reasonably unfettered communication (that we enjoy) to be able to join us.

      I clothe myself in far more tin foil than you will ever see in your life but I am under no illusion that I am being fettered in any way. Spied upon? possibly, but only in an uncaring data gathering because terrists or marketing way.

      The internet is working the way it is precisely because of the way it is designed and who it was designed for: humans.

    2. Re:At my humble opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems you missed the point. You are just confirming it. Most communications between parties are taking place via these main servers: Gmail, Facebook, Twitter, What's up, etc. To share your pictures, you put them on a huge server somewhere. Exactly like the old IBM mainframe paradigm and its network architecture. The Internet is asymetric, even if you are reluctant to admit it. When you argue it is democratized you miss again the point. You have no control once you have put your stuff and underpants on these servers. You give your data for free to these giants because you have no other alternative.

    3. Re:At my humble opinion... by hackwrench · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The software running atop the network enables some democracy, but when it comes to forming links, the hardware is designed for centralization. The data flows from the user across lines that link to central pathways. There isn't a hand-off to other routers that are on the fringe in the current design, but wouldn't be if the topology wasn't to route everything through centralized paths. If the topology was democratized, my router would be in direct communication with other people's routers, all relaying how fast they can get the data closer to where it's to arrive.

  11. Encrypt all the things!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (What the subject says.)

  12. Telegrams by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Much of what people communicated in the 19th century wasn't preserved. All those telegrams that should have been filed away neatly! And very little of Oral History was ever recorded.

    There's this conceited notion that we can sum up and figure out the world by studying the past. The notion some people have of 'history' presumes that what we have here and now has a permanence. The concept that history has ended and we're just supposed to document everything.

    Maybe everything we 'figure out' by digging through the historical record will be forgotten or discarded.

    An anecdote: when the Egyptian kings were entombed, they were buried with a lot of mummified cats. In the late 19th century when the British colonialists were excavating the tombs, the remains of the cats were sold as fertilizer.

    What you think is important to preserve might not be at all important to anybody in the future.

    1. Re:Telegrams by JSG · · Score: 1

      "An anecdote: when the Egyptian kings were entombed, they were buried with a lot of mummified cats. In the late 19th century when the British colonialists were excavating the tombs, the remains of the cats were sold as fertilizer."

      They would be "colonials" if they were taking over the place. I think the word you want is "archaeologist".

      A mummified cat is a tiny thing and I doubt it would fertilize anything effectively after several 1000 years, what with being somewhat desiccated. I don't think it would really be worth grinding up a mummified cat when you could simply gather up horse, donkey or mule shit instead. All of those churn out fertilizer at a prodigious rate.

      I really hope your anecdote was not imparted to you via your formal education. If it was, I'd ask for your money back. If you are from the UK: I'll ask for *my* money back.

    2. Re:Telegrams by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Are you just a pedant?
      I guess you consider yourself somewhat of an expert on mule shit. Great.

      popular media cite

      somwhat more referenced cite.

      You're not getting your money back. Maybe you should have said something when they were taxing you.

    3. Re:Telegrams by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the people who excavated things back then had the qualifications for being a modern archeologist. I think they still do fit the other term whichever way you want to call it. I don't get this insistence that tax dollars are still yours once you've paid it.

  13. Sorry but no... by buckfeta2014 · · Score: 1

    ...that old fart may have invented or had dealings that caused what we now refer to as "the internet", but his recent ramblings don't inspire much optimism. No thanks.

    --
    Buck Feta. You know what to do.
  14. Re: Vint shoves greased up yoda dolls in his gay a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the strangest thing I've seen here in a long long time.

  15. IPFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been following IPFS with some interest lately. Quoting the website:

    The InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) is a peer-to-peer distributed file system that seeks to connect all computing devices with the same system of files. In some ways, IPFS is similar to the Web, but IPFS could be seen as a single BitTorrent swarm, exchanging objects within one Git repository. In other words, IPFS provides a high throughput content-addressed block storage model, with content-addressed hyperlinks. This forms a generalized Merkle DAG, a data structure upon which one can build versioned file systems, blockchains, and even a Permanent Web. IPFS combines a distributed hashtable, an incentivized block exchange, and a self-certifying namespace. IPFS has no single point of failure, and nodes do not need to trust each other.

    I really like the concept, though I'm not sure how dynamic content such as a search engine or e-commerce website could be served through such a system.

    1. Re:IPFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up mod parent. IPFS needs to happen. It's entire goal is to execute the very things most people (with sense) want:
      1) Decentralize the web
      2) Make encryption standard/easy
      3) Bake in anonymity (see 2)
      4) Make moving money easy (see 2 & 3)
      5) Decentralize the web

  16. Re: Vint shoves greased up yoda dolls in his gay a by JSG · · Score: 1

    There have been several other outbreaks recently. As you say: Bloody odd.

    Wait till the cows come out. They are due any moment now ....

    MOOOOOOO and all that bollocks.

  17. REMOVE WINDOWS AND IT'S FINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    There is no need to look for some "new internet". When new things appear that are good you keep them. You can not just say oh, let's take decades of profound protocols and innovations and say hey, let's systemd the whole internet guys. Let's just put it all in one windows registry to simplify it. That is like taking every item in your kitchen and putting them in one drawer. You organize separately.

    This big push all around the world (corp/gov) to "get those fresh ideas in there, take some control, let's track" is absolutely asinine.

    Microsoft is now out of the closet in exactly this regard. They betrayed the global public trying to push Windows 10 and it's new long-as-fuck agreement that includes permissions to spy on your keystrokes (literally) and on your files (literally). If you think any corporation deserves this trust you don't understand human nature worth a shit. Pre-existing surrender-your-life-data to Facebook is not justification for your actual OS to be total spyware/malware on a global level especially.

    I have to admit this is funny: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8000075&cid=50511107

    It absolutely made me laugh out loud. Why is it funny? Because you can tell who is doing it and it's literally the only possible tactic to try to counter the truth. They try to hide comments with mod points here. They try to smoke and mirror it. They try to obfuscate it.

    Whoever's github this is

    https://gitlab.com/windowslies/blockwindows ...says in giant bold print...

    PS There is a highly concerted effort by Microsoft Employees to harass websites that link to this. I'm tired of constantly trying to convince website admins it's not spam.
    Please repost these URLs many places on social media, blogs, etc. I'm in it for the long haul.

    So how are they so insane to try to botnet the population of Earth with Windows 10? I guess they got old and said fuck it? Let's sneak this out there before we die?

    I suggest the hosts file from that github. If you feel like updating your PC and delude yourself that Microsoft won't add your PC to their botnet... you can always rename the hosts file to hosts_disable then do your updates and rename it back. Really just don't use Windows for any remotely sketchy website. I can understand keeping it for games, but even then, hosts file your system to not connect to things you don't intend it to.

    Let's see if this even remains viewable without moving your sliders. this did. http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7988275&cid=50500123

    1. Re:REMOVE WINDOWS AND IT'S FINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you opened my eyes, now I realize, windows surely is a big mistake!

    2. Re:REMOVE WINDOWS AND IT'S FINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you opened my eyes, now I realize, windows surely is a big mistake!

      See how fast it got modded -1.

      Everybody should be posting this everywhere since Microsoft wants to play war of sneaks.

    3. Re:REMOVE WINDOWS AND IT'S FINE by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I read at -1. Surely I'm not the only one.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    4. Re:REMOVE WINDOWS AND IT'S FINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read at -1. Surely I'm not the only one.

      It doesn't get scraped by Google though does it.

      You can search Google for the post above (#50512039) where the user hackwrench said "it reminds me of this homosexual video" and it shows up in Google. A totally who-gives-a-flying-fuck comment.

      But when you search Google for any/all of the Parent text in comment (#50511399) not a damn thing comes up.

      Try it. Highlight your mouse over the entire comment of those two posts. You get this https://imgur.com/LKORwbh

      Now try with any or even all of the parent post. Not a fucking thing, right. I'd snip a small jpg if it was found. This is called censoring. This is the purpose of "mod points" and "facebook likes" and "+1's". It's why I said fuck Myspace/Facebook/Reddit and fuck Slashdot "accounts" after 2x way back when it was brand new. Somehow you think if you put some "Zontar the Dickless" on a comment you have credibility? People can't discern good communication and useful information without "an account"? Really? And even so... on a fucking website with a yro your rights online category?

      All across the board, dickmove. There is literally no reason to hide it.. unless you want it hidden. Does ascii on the Internet really fuck with your life so hard that you are out there burying comments? It is absolutely intentional to block the information. 100% bitches. It doesn't even stop people from understanding it, it just slows people down from understanding it. And you chime in with absolutely another who-gives-a-fuck-on-planet-Earth comment.. and you get +2. That results in this: https://imgur.com/OvjFx8g

      Watch how this shit turns out. Censorship looks all good to "some" with hair-brained agendas and "for a while"... but it's very short-sighted. It is unwise. It even surpasses unwise to the extent of idiotic. Blatantly foolish. Dumb as fuck.

      Use whatever device operating system you want, anybody, I just think it should be an INFORMED DECISION if a person wants to surrender their PC's and devices that THEY BUY with THEIR MONEY and store THEIR DATA ON to any backstabbing convoluted shitcode monolithicOS-selling company.

      I absolutely don't sell Linux, it is free. I've used it for a long time even when it had a learning curve... it's time for the sheep to stampede Microsoft's piece of shit global spyware OS. Hidden in a very verbose "new agreement" is some new backstab shit. And there are websites saying this exact same thing, I am not like the only person on Earth who gets it. So get busy shills. Start really hiding shit. Devote your life to being out of closets while putting everything else in the closet.

      By the way, it was -1 while a front page "story" and now it's back to 0 but Flamebait. Still not Google searchable, BUT, if you search for bits and pieces of the parent post... you get a lot of other related sites.

  18. Better encryption by jonwil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Start by replacing the broken CA model and push much harder for alternatives like DANE and the EFF Sovereign Keys proposal.

    Stop the NSA or the Chinese Government (or hackers who steal the master keys for a CA ala DigiNotar) from being able to generate a certificate for a domain and perform MITM attacks with it.

    Replace TLS with something designed from the ground up to be as simple as possible. Any "optional" features in the protocol that could be turned on by the server or client are extra vectors for attack.

    Mandate forward-secrecy (via Ephemeral Diffie-Helman or similar) to prevent bad guys who later obtain private keys from decrypting previous traffic. Support only the strongest algorithms (RSA with at least 2048 bits, AES, SHA2/SHA3) and dont support obsolete algorithms like RC4, SHA1, MD5, DES or 3DES.

    Make email encryption so easy anyone can do it. And build it into all the popular email clients (with encryption turned on by default) so that encrypted email becomes the rule rather than the exception.

    Invent open-standard open-protocol chat programs (for voice, video, text and file transfer) with end-to-end encryption (including some sort of forward secrecy so that once the session is over, it becomes impossible for anyone to decrypt the conversations and get the data back)

    1. Re:Better encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He wants to preserve and expose the data to future generations for posterity. Not hide it.

  19. Seriously? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    "In the case of Doris Kearns Goodwin, the letters were 140 years old, and I would guess that digital content that was created 10 years ago won't be accessible 10 years from now," said Cerf. "We have the media around, but you may not be able to read it."

    Honestly, I can't think of any format used in 2005 that's not readable in 2015. Anyone? Sure there were a few really odd and obscure formats used in the first years of computing that was heavily tied to playback hardware or media, but that is all. As long as you can dig up a binary to run in a VM most anything should be readable. And purely for reading documents this is beating down open doors, PDF/A already exists and is an extremely well documented standard for long term document preservation.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  20. cyberpunk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing can ever be made.

    the enemy of the free internet is ourselves.

    NO FUTURE!

  21. Class Action Lawsuit anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone want to join me in suing Cerf for "porn elbow"?

  22. Some files, yes. Personal AOL messages? No. Lincol by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I too have some files from almost 20 years ago that I can still read. I save most things as ASCII text.

    On the other hand, we can still read President Lincoln's letters to his wife. I WISH I could read the messages I sent my wife just eight years ago.

  23. Abraham Lincoln Godwins the Internet with SNA? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Well, that thought is a hoot and a half . . . the former President of the USA fiddling around with LU 6.2, while the "Monitor" (TCP/IP) slugs it out with the Merrimac (ISO/OSI) . . .

    I'm sorry for trolling your dinner . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  24. the man sold his soul to google a long time ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Vint Cerf sold the internet's soul to Google (and the cia/nsa) a long time ago. The unspoken rule of his propped up version of 'Network Neutrality' was "Google's server's advertisement and tracking traffic shall be blessed, while your home server traffic which might detract from Google's server's dominance shall be shit upon by greedy fucking corporation's terms of services and acceptable use policies."

  25. Re:Vint shoves greased up yoda dolls in his gay as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yep, you're the prime example why half of the internet should be burned down and not preserved lol...
    Someone should tell Cerf this is no longer the 90's scientific and academic internet. This is a trolls nest ruled by 4chan teens.

  26. Re:Vint shoves greased up yoda dolls in his gay as by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    It's worse on mobile, the entire message is shown in its entirety without having a click to show the rest of the post option. I started to click on report this post, but it wanted a description and messages this bizarre defy description, at least for me.

  27. Re: Vint shoves greased up yoda dolls in his gay a by davester666 · · Score: 1

    I think he upgraded his auto-generation script to throw in returns finally.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  28. Re:Oh you opened my eyes by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Thank You God - Tim Minchin

  29. Easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The future is everything is corporate, commercial, and government. The internet will no longer be for individual voices, but for consumption. And voicing dissent or disagreement online will be construed as harassment or terrorism. Welcome to the new Television.

  30. Solution: Google Drive... or not by nadass · · Score: 1

    The innovators of the next generation of digital media storage already exist! It's called "Google" and is operated by a philanthropic corporation named "Alphabet" and they have the means to preserve, transform, index, and search the media assets to better develop patterns and similarities between various generations' communication choices.

    Seriously, though, we cannot undo the decisions and mistakes from all past generations who have communicated in any modern or dead language... yet chose to not preserve their copies (or had them destroyed by ISIS/ISIL or some-such groups). Information is not meant to exist forever; the Internet is a means of communication and not preservation.

    And what if we do manage to preserve an entire generation's worth of media -- what value could such rough add? It simply becomes a massive corpus of junk by the next generation's digital archeologists. They'll surely find their diamond, but it'll come at great expense.

  31. Resurrect COM-PRIV by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    THE most effective organ critical to the development of INTERNET is missing. Resurrect and revive it.

  32. Re: Vint shoves greased up yoda dolls in his gay a by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    It's quite old-skool, actually.

    Looks like he put some real effort into it, too.

    I'm actually kinda almost just about very nearly sort of borderline impressed.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  33. Re: Some files, yes. Personal AOL messages? No. Li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Email is plain text and one of the easy problems surely? I have 25 years of sent and received email accessible (now in Maildir format via IMAP, converted from Mbox around 12 years ago) back to when I started using it.

  34. Cliff Stoll asked I do the same on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Thanks! Now it's your turn: Go forth & make our networked community friendlier, stronger, more trustworthy, & more useful. Best wishes, -Cliff" - by Cliff Stoll (242915) on Friday June 06, 2014 @03:12PM (#47182047) Homepage

    See subject: He's an inspiration of mine & I did via -> APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    FREE & adds speed, security, + reliability, doing more with less, more efficiently vs. browser addons & locally installed DNS servers @ home + fixes DNS' redirect security issues - obtaining its data vs. online threats & adbanner blocking from 10 reputable sites in the security community - using something you already have vs. "bolting on browser addons 'MOAR' that's usermode slower & increases messagepassing, cpu + ram overuse overheads & actually SPEEDS YOU UP 2 ways (adblocking + locally cached in RAM favorites placed @ the TOP of hosts for fastest resolution speed) whereas by way of comparison other "so-called security 'solutions'" SLOW YOU DOWN!

    * :)

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    ---

    "The premise is quite simple: Take something designed by nature & reprogram it to make it work for the body rather than against it..." - Dr. Alice Krippen: "I am legend"...

    APK

    P.S.=> By "yours truly" - "The Lord of Hosts" so-to-speak:

    PERTINENT QUOTE/EXCERPT:

    "The image this title brings to mind is of a mighty military commander, one who can at a mere word summon rank upon rank of protective power" from https://answers.yahoo.com/ques... & That word = hosts!

    (Accept NO substitutes!)

    ...apk

  35. Re: the man sold his soul to google a long time ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much. An army of Chinese and indian slaves run the internet for the bankers

  36. 20 years old digital media unreadable? by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    I have plenty (a majority I would say) of 30+ year old Apple II disks that are still readable.

  37. Re:Vint shoves greased up yoda dolls in his gay as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I called it "Bizarre offtopic obscene homophobic rambling spam" which admittedly isn't 100% accurate but comes fairly close.

  38. no address to reply by Skapare · · Score: 1

    no address to reply? my internet design change .... ALL communications must be replyable.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  39. One Year Late by speedplane · · Score: 1

    Why is the letter dated September 10, 2014?

    --
    Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    1. Re:One Year Late by speedplane · · Score: 1

      He also has two versions of the letter:

      http://img.deusm.com/informati...
      http://about.lettrs.com/wp-con...

      Smells fishy.

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
  40. futurism by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

    Letter was dated 2014, did anyone notice? But it reads like "2014" is just a typo, and it should have been 2015. Had me wondering if we were being fed old news.

    He wants some futurism? Hmm. The first question is whether any small group will take over control of our networking, or is that impossible? I think it is impossible, but that won't stop control freaks from trying. Since it is impossible, copyright as we know it will wither. Next, one of the things that divides people into nations is language barriers. Advances in automatic translation will erase that barrier. Also, the dominance of English will grow. The nation state will weaken further. Nations used to be much more jealous about citizenship, insisting that anyone who emigrated was practically a traitor, and never allowing dual citizenship. Now, the attitude is more relaxed and dual citizenship is fairly common. Right now, we're in a minor backlash against science and merit, with the Republicans in particular encouraging this backlash as it makes propaganda easier to pull off. I don't think it will last as information becomes ever easier to store and retrieve, and with increasingly sophisticated educational aides, everyone will get smarter.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  41. IPFS by JigJag · · Score: 1

    I found this free/open source new protocol that aims at filling the gaps that HTTP has in terms of permanence and security of data. Loosely based on DHT and Coin mining, it allows for website to become P2P instead of centrally served.

    The protocol is called IPFS and the site where you can get more information is http://ipfs.io/

    --
    "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
  42. Re:Seriously? - X1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My work involves a lot of thought about digital official government records archiving. I think Vint needs to visit archives.gov because they have a pretty good handle on the tech side of things. They are really just hampered by the sequester funding approach.

    Commercially I use X1 (x1.com) that can read back to my Word for Windows 1.0 files from 1990. It can also deal with all the old formats of WordPerfect, Lotus 1-2-3 and Excel.

    So my answer to Vint is virtual machines that emulate the older environments and applications software in their own sandboxes (it would be nice to have the manufacturers agree to let people do this) and what X1 does which is file readers that can provide search and indexing.