Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Sued For Scanning Direct Messages

JustAnotherOldGuy writes: Twittter is facing a new possible class action suit that accuses the company of violating user privacy. The lawsuit states that the company has been "systematically intercepting, reading, and altering" direct messages, most likely a reference to Twitter's long-standing practice of automatically shortening and redirecting any in-message links. The practice could be used to monitor or redirect any URLs included in a direct message, although it's generally seen as a benign extension of the company's broader link-shortening systems. In a statement to USA Today, Twitter, to nobody's surprise, insisted that the allegations are "meritless."

4 of 80 comments (clear)

  1. Facebook too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Facebook is being sued over the same practice, as well as for taking it a step further. If you mention a business's Facebook link (and possibly their independent website URL) in a private message, that mention gets counted as a "like" on the business's Facebook page. So not only were they scanning PMs, they were representing endorsements that didn't exist.

    This kind of shit is what you get when you use a huge advertising platform as your "private" communication hub.

  2. Workaround by jdavidb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I haven't used twitter in five years and in that time they haven't intercepted, read, or altered any of my messages.

  3. User privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that, like, still a thing?

  4. Re:s/shortening/elongating/ by citizenr · · Score: 3, Informative

    the correct term is tracking engagement

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.