Slashdot Mirror


Advanced Civilizations Probably Don't Exist In Our Galactic Neighborhood

schwit1 writes: New observations of the best candidate galaxies now suggest that advanced civilizations are very rare or don't exist in the local universe. Researchers looked at several hundred nearby galaxies that emitted a high amount of mid-infrared radiation (abstract), which could possibly be produced as the waste heat from civilizations using energy on galactic scales.

They found: "The presence of radio emission at the levels expected from the correlation, suggests that the mid-IR emission is not heat from alien factories but more likely emission from dust — for example, dust generated and heated by regions of massive star formation. As Professor Garrett explains: 'the original research at Penn State has already told us that such systems are very rare but the new analysis suggests that this is probably an understatement, and that advanced Kardashev Type III civilizations basically don't exist in the local Universe.'"

Obviously, the uncertainty of these results is quite high. Nonetheless, the results indicate that either humanity really is the only intelligent species in this part of the universe, or advanced civilizations are far more efficient in their use of energy than is reasonable to assume.

21 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. Evidence of the Great Filter? by cunniff · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Planets are common. Planets within the habitable zone look like they are common. So, is this evidence of the Great Filter - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ?

    1. Re:Evidence of the Great Filter? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My personal opinion is that life is really, really, really, REALLY rare. It only seems like it ought to be common because of the Anthropic Principle. We're can observe ourselves and thus it seems like life is easy. But everything would be exactly the same if we were completely unique in the universe. In fact, if the universe were cyclic and it took 1e1035 universe cycles for life to happen, things would look exactly the same. We simply have no basis for knowing how probable it is. Given how insanely complex we are, I suspect that it's exceedingly rare.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Evidence of the Great Filter? by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if life isn't rare , theres no guarantee that the random steps that led to a human civilisation that can create radio signals, ie:

      life -> multicellular life -> dinosaurs -> asteroid impact -> mammals -> apes -> humans -> civilisation -> farming -> nation states -> discovery of coal seams -> metal refining -> industrial revolution -> electronics revolution

      would ever happen anywhere else either in another order or at all.

      There may be plenty of life in the universe but I suspect the number of technological civilisations is tiny.

    3. Re:Evidence of the Great Filter? by kat_skan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Even if it isn't rare, and human-like civilization also isn't rare, there's still no guarantee that we would have heard from them by now. Our own radio signals have only reached a tiny fraction of our galaxy, which is just one out of hundreds of billions. The Universe is just so stupefyingly, mind-blowingly enormous it's hard to say how common advanced civilizations are based on evidence from the scant few decades we've been listening for them.

    4. Re:Evidence of the Great Filter? by invid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A good candidate for the filter is the ability to do math. Think about how few humans can even do calculus. We might discover the universe filled with semi-intelligent species with number systems with only 3 numbers: one, two, and many.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    5. Re:Evidence of the Great Filter? by meglon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. Because we haven't seen them up to now, with our rather primitive, blind searching doesn't mean they're not there, just that we haven't seen them. Takes a great deal of arrogance to think we've seen all, done all, and nothing new will ever be. 35 years ago (when i was in college... how depressing) we were still trying to figure out if quasars were in our galaxy with an unknown reason for their massive redshift, or outside our galaxy with an unknown reason for their massive energy output.

      Whether life (intelligent, technologically advanced civilizations) is common or rare, the simple fact is we're not going to have a definitive search done for them in a just few decades, and the fact we haven't seen them really means nothing at all.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    6. Re:Evidence of the Great Filter? by gizmo2199 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even within our own human population it seems that only a relatively small number of people have allowed us to advance past the age of agriculture, into the age of electronics and interconnected networks.

      I don't think that's true at all. Anyone who studies technological advancement, or the philosophy of science, can tell that it's a heuristic process. In other words, it's the result of many, sometimes "average" people taking a crack at a problem over a long period of time, until someone is finally able to put all that work together to get a solution.

      The oft-cited "genius" making a technological breakthrough by himself is really just a myth.

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
  2. Why assume inefficiency? by Mab_Mass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is this huge assumption that alien civilizations will be emitting large amounts of waste heat. What happens if they are just more efficient than us?

    1. Re:Why assume inefficiency? by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Efficiency can only get you so far. You use enough energy, you will get waste heat as entropy, and entropy is inescapable. Of course, they might use hyperspatial redirection or subspace quantum oscillation phase modulation or something to make it look different to us or send it to another pocket dimension, but chances are, we'd have some indication of a Type III civilization.

      What we should really be calling the summary out on is the fact that they equate a Type III civilization with an "advanced civilization". Yeah, it's advanced all right, but the bloody United Federation of Planets would only be something like a Type II. You have to control the energy output of an *entire galaxy* to be a Type III.

    2. Re:Why assume inefficiency? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This analysis seems to be completely lacking. They're looking at waste heat and saying "well, there don't appear to be any Type III civilizations around here". Then they say that humans are the only "advanced species" around here. Ok, even if we assume that Type III aliens are this inefficient with waste heat, this just doesn't make sense. On the Kardashev scale, humans don't even place! We are not an "advanced species", because we haven't even made it to Type I, let alone II or III. What about Type I or II civilizations? This analysis has no way of determining if any of those are nearby. Type I civilizations would be completely invisible to us from a distance, and even Type II civilizations would probably be very difficult to spot. A Type III would be easier, since that's a civilization that uses the entire energy output of a galaxy, but really that kind of civilization is rather difficult for us humans to even comprehend.

      Just for reference, the civilization depicted in Star Trek: TNG, with warp drive and a Federation spanning a good chunk of this galaxy's quadrant, is still only a Type I civilization. The episode where they found an abandoned Dyson Sphere (the one with Scotty) showed a Type II civilization, but it's unlikely a real Dyson Sphere would even look like that; it probably wouldn't be able to hold itself together; a real one would be lots of separate pieces orbiting in formation.

    3. Re:Why assume inefficiency? by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think even the United Federation of Planets qualifies as Type II. They haven't harnessed the entire energy output of a star. The engineering implications of that are mind-boggling; we've dreamed up Dyson Spheres, but those really don't seem realistic, unless we can somehow invent "scrith".

      Our current civilization doesn't even place on the scale. We're probably like a Type 0.5 at best.

  3. "indicate that either humanity really is the only" by Gaygirlie · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mmmno. The research doesn't indicate anything like that at all. They were looking for civilizations that harness energy and resources at galactic scales, ie. Kardashev III - level civilizations. Mankind haven't even reached Kardashev I yet. The submitter didn't understand what they were reading and jumped to conclusions.

  4. Shouldn't it mean "Didn't Exists"? by dmomo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...as of thousands to millions of years ago, anyway? Speed of light, and all.

  5. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is known that there are an infinite number of worlds, simply because there is an infinite amount of space for them to be in. However, not every one of them is inhabited. Therefore, there must be a finite number of inhabited worlds. Any finite number divided by infinity is as near to nothing as makes no odds, so the average population of all the planets in the Universe can be said to be zero. From this it follows that the population of the whole Universe is also zero, and that any people you may meet from time to time are merely the products of a deranged imagination.

  6. Re:For how long are we "advanced" enough by war4peace · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm no expert, but I remember reading that digital communication is virtually undetectable at galactic distances, because it fades way more quickly and becomes indistinguishable from background noise.
    About the heat emissions... dunno what to say. An advanced civilization might be so thinned out, galactic-wise that it would emit an insignificant amount of heat. Or it could be a race which doesn't reproduce easily and lives for a long time, e.g. a couple million sentient beings per planet, who need very little in terms of energy. The possibilities are limitless.

    Just wondering... how much heat does mankind generate? Can someone 1000 LY away detect our heat emissions?

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  7. The night is still young... by no1nose · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps intelligent civilization will originate from Earth and spread across the Universe. Everything has a beginning.

  8. Re:Strange point of view by Grishnakh · · Score: 3

    You can't escape waste heat; it's part of entropy. Unless maybe you open a subspace portal or something like that, but obviously our understanding of physics doesn't allow for anything of that sort.

    This is the problem with trying to understand hypothetical advanced civilizations; if any really exist, most likely they're figured out things in physics which we still have no clue about. We only started figuring out quantum mechanics about a century ago, and without that we wouldn't have semiconductors, including microchips and LEDs. We've barely even gotten off our own planet.

  9. Re:For how long are we "advanced" enough by shess · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm no expert, but I remember reading that digital communication is virtually undetectable at galactic distances, because it fades way more quickly and becomes indistinguishable from background noise.

    Nah, it's worse than that. Spectrum is finite, so the incentive over time is to use interesting encoding techniques to smear the data across the available spectrum. If you don't know the protocols, a given frequency mostly looks like noise in the time domain. And there are similar incentives to fill up the frequency domain. And there's incentive to use lower power, so that more transmitters can share the frequency, so those are all going to merge into a mess, too.

    Basically, by design our radio output is tending towards noise which will be impossible to differentiate from a light year away.

  10. Re:News? by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's kinda hard to have evidence of aliens if you never bother to leave your own planet, or send any probes beyond your own star system. Basically, such evidence would require the aliens to travel here to visit us. If there's any aliens out there in nuclear-powered generation ships or whatever, there's no way for us to see them until they're in orbit around our planet.

    There's a whole galaxy out there we haven't explored, plus billions more galaxies beyond that. Just because we don't have reliable evidence of aliens visiting us here on Earth (aside from things like Roswell and cattle mutilations and claims of abductions) doesn't mean there aren't any out there anywhere; it's ridiculously arrogant and stupid to even think that. There could be aliens with a civilization similar to ours on one of the planets at our nearest neighbor, Alpha Centauri, and we wouldn't know it because we have no way of seeing them. Maybe they're technologically where we were in 1830 and haven't developed radio yet, or maybe they're 150 years ahead of us and have gone to spread-spectrum communication so their transmissions just look like noise to us and we missed all the detectable stuff.

  11. timelines make this rather not useful. by sdinfoserv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All this really says is that civilizations emitting IR were not found in Y regions of the galaxy at time X in history.
    Since these regions are different 'light years' away in distance, what reaches us is not the current state of what's going on there.
    An advanced planet 500 light years from Earth looking today for other advanced race would not find us since 500 years ago we were not creating IR signatures.
    Likewise, if we found such a signature, the possibility exists that during the time the IR got here, that civilization ceased to exist.

  12. Re:Evidence of error? by qeveren · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How do we even know the warm dust isn't the substrate for an advanced civilization?

    --
    Don't just stand there, get that other dog!