Slashdot Mirror


Robots' Next Big Job: Trash Pickup

Nerval's Lobster writes: You've heard of self-driving cars, fast-moving robots, and automated homes. Now a research group led by Volvo, a waste-recycling company, and a trio of universities in the United States and Sweden want to bring much of the same technology to bear on a new problem: trash disposal. Specifically, the consortium wants to build a robot that will collect trash-bins from in front of peoples' homes, carry those bins to the nearest waste-disposal truck, and empty them. While that's a pretty simple (although smelly) task for a human being, it's an incredibly complex task for a robot, which will need to evaluate and respond to a wide range of environmental variables while carrying a heavy load. An uneven curb, or an overloaded bin, could spell disaster. Hopefully Volvo's experiment can succeed in a way that some of its other self-driving projects have failed. It's struck me, too, how the trash collection vehicles that come by my house are mostly piloted robots already; the humans are there to deal with problems and control the joysticks, but hydraulic arms lift and empty the garbage containers themselves.

112 comments

  1. Maybe for urban areas... by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but in suburban and rural areas this really wouldn't be that necessary. As long as there's room for a standardized bin to be wheeled to the street by the tenant or resident of the property then the trash truck is capable of automatically picking up the can and dumping its contents so long as the driver stops the truck at the right spot.

    There are still some places where two or three men work each truck, where one drives and one or two manually dump the tenants' or residents' own cans instead of a standardized can supplied by the municipality, but I suspect those are more due to negotiated rules between the unions and the waste management services; the unions want to keep their people employed and the service doesn't want to spend $300,000 per truck to replace their old manual truck that still run with new automated trucks, so they keep the existing system in place.

    Makes me wonder how easy it would be to automate trash collection from high density areas though, where each building and possibly each floor would have its own unique method for placing trash for collection. It might require standardization, to a degree, on the part of the residents.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice job there layoff the people who know how to relay gum up the works I hope the to it first on the rich parts of town.

    2. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

      AI pretty much agree. The process is already pretty automated as it is. Truck comes by every Thursday and robotic arms already grab and empty the bin.

      The pace at which the driver can move from house to house is pretty impressive. Our entire street doesn't take more than a few minutes. I honestly don't see It getting much more efficient.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    3. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      There are still some places where two or three men work each truck, where one drives and one or two manually dump the tenants' or residents' own cans instead of a standardized can supplied by the municipality

      The City of Atlanta supplies standardized cans but still has guys on the truck manually emptying them. Maybe that's why trash pickup costs almost $50/month (for a single-family residence) here.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by TWX · · Score: 1

      That seems weird. Our standardized cans for recycling are too large and heavy to be manhandled when they're full. The trash here is picked up from the alley, in cans that are very, very big and definitely not man-movable.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The process is already pretty automated as it is.

      I get the feeling that the author of TFA doesn't really know the state-of-the-art in trash disposal. Unless you can replace the driver, the process is not going to get much more efficient, and I don't think a 5 ton garbage truck in a residential neighborhood is a good place to introduce self-driving vehicles.

    6. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by plover · · Score: 2

      The outlier that still amazes me was featured on Mike Rowe's "Dirty Jobs" show, where a trash collector in New Orleans uses a canvas sack. He negotiates a tiny staircase to climb or descend to a shop, dumps their trash into his tarp, then hauls the tarp back down to the truck where he empties it. It looks unchanged from the founding days of New Orleans.

      Could this be automated? There isn't currently space in the alleys or in the buildings for the trash cans themselves. It would require the city to change how trash collectors operate.

      --
      John
    7. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      classic youtube
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FryTj_5uSA

    8. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      I pay $26 a month for once weekly trash pickup, and it is done via machine truck with only a driver using those standard large cans.

      That $26 also covers yard debris removal and once a month bulk collection removal. It also includes every other week recycling removal.

      I honestly can't complain... For $300 a year, an incredible amount of waste, both trash and recycle materials, is removed from my home with the only effort on my part to put it in the back drive way either in one of the large bins, or on the ground near one...

      I could be mistaken, but that strikes me as a bargain...

    9. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Likewise... While two people could lift one of our cans while full, it would be a heck of a task, they are 52 or 56 gallon cans that are heavy as heck when full of trash...

      The robot truck picks them up like they are toys however.

    10. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      i'm all for it if they can stop running over my lawn in the alleyway. or at least alternate, they never seem to run over the lawn of my neighbor across the alley. ever.

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    11. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Our cans -- for both trash and recycling -- are "herby curbys," so they're (just barely) small enough to be wheeled or dragged around by a person, but probably not lifted. There are always three guys on a garbage truck: one to drive, and two to grab cans from the curb and put them on the lift to be dumped in the truck. The crew works both sides of the street at the same time, which is why there are two guys in the back, not one.

      Maybe "manually" was a poor choice of words since a machine actually dumps the can, but the process isn't totally automated such that the truck only needs a driver, either.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Though our county service still uses the 2 men on the back of the truck method, it is now providing a standard trash can. If a marker were placed on the can next to the handle in the back, it shouldn't be TOO hard to get a grappler to find it's way to the handle (much like the automated charger we saw on /. a month or two ago finds the charge port). That would at least simplify the problem to be a matter of making sure the handle faces the street.

    13. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by hannisingh0001 · · Score: 1

      No Robot works as according to human understanding. If someone made a one of them. So, I thought that would be the masterpiece now. Bcos many of huge technology have made across the world. But human can't control as well if there is self-driving cars, fast-moving robots, and automated homes. Machines will help a lot to live better life with safety. So, Looking for safety of home, vehicle safety devices with key code. http://www.locksmithsinscottsd...

    14. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by operagost · · Score: 1

      That's a flat-out ripoff. We have people in my town who claim that our private trash pickup companies are somehow a menace to our roads (we have three or four who serve the area). They'd like to get a municipal contact, and claim it won't cost any more. I current pay $87 every three months. What do you think the chances are of that one monopoly company NOT jacking up the rate by the first contract renewal?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    15. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by andy+carrol · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about you dear these robots are just for showcase not use for real life. As according to the theory when robots do the task in the world then they can be evolve and they can destroy the human.

    16. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      The process is already pretty automated as it is. Truck comes by every Thursday and robotic arms already grab and empty the bin.

      Our semi-rural area is kind of weird. While our recycle bins are provided by the disposal company and are emptied by a semi-automated truck in the manner you describe, our garbage pickup (run by that same company) involves a guy on the truck picking up our (self-provided) trash cans and dumping them into the truck manually.

      Actually half the time it appears the poor guy driving the truck is doing it all - driving the truck, getting out, running to the curb, dumping the can, then getting back into the truck to drive it another few hundred feet to the next house. I hope he's well compensated on those days.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    17. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are still some places where two or three men work each truck, where one drives and one or two manually dump the tenants' or residents' own cans instead of a standardized can supplied by the municipality

      The City of Atlanta supplies standardized cans but still has guys on the truck manually emptying them. Maybe that's why trash pickup costs almost $50/month (for a single-family residence) here.

      Why don't you decline the service then and handle it yourself by driving to the dump every week?
      Or move to a place that doesn't mind if people let flies and maggots accumulate on their trash in their own yard, aka not require trash service?

      How much do you think having someone cart away your filth every week to a designated dumping ground is worth? Do you think you can do it better/faster/cheaper? Then go into business and do so.

      Otherwise, please suck it up and let the rest of us enjoy civilization.

    18. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      That's a flat-out ripoff.

      No kidding! And it's even worse than the situation you're talking about for your town: in Atlanta, trash pickup is run directly by the Public Works department. And it's billed as part of the property tax, so if you don't pay it they can foreclose on your house.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    19. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      We have standardized bins for compost items (food waste, cat litter, etc) and when they are aren't very full the person empties it into the truck themselves. When it's heavy they use the lifter at the back of the truck. While the lifter is quick it's quicker still for them to dump it themselves.

      They are probably paid so much for doing the route or at least a certain minimum number of hours and when they are done their route they can go. I know that the people that deliver mail to the community mailboxes in Canada are paid for 7.5 hours a day no matter how long it actually takes them to do their route. Nice in the summer when mail volume is low. Sucks in December when they are pulling 14-16 hour days, six days a week. I've even seen them deliver parcels on Sundays just so that Monday was a tolerable 14 hour day.

    20. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by TWX · · Score: 1

      It's not all that different in high-density cities like New York. In some buildings garbage men still climb stairs up to upper floors to grab plastic bags of garbage left out in the hall by the tenants of the floor, haul them down to the truck, and go back up for more again.

      That's part why I don't know how good robotics would be for this unless they're willing to also modify how the trash gets accumulated in the buildings to start with, and the more consolidation done in each building, the easier it is to pick-up without using advanced robots.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    21. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by TWX · · Score: 1

      Here, the claw is two clamshell halves with rubber pulled from two points. As the clamshell closes the rubber, not the metal, grabs the barrel. The arm lifts it and as it pivots over the truck right behind the cab the lid falls open from gravity and the contents spill into the truck. The truck then presses the contents back from the cab to the back of the hopper, so that the same hydraulics can also dump the truck when they get to the landfill.

      It's very efficient. There's enough play in the claw that it doesn't have to stop perfectly positioned next to the can, and often the claw is on a horizontal track, so one stop could collect two cans without moving the truck if they're close enough together. The cans are fairly durable so the beating they take doesn't destroy them very quickly, and the truck can dump a load in a second.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    22. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Yep. The exception I see is that sometimes the dude has to hop out when there is a car too close and he needs to drag it out in the street. Autonomous trash trucks won't handle that.

    23. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Yep. The exception I see is that sometimes the dude has to hop out when there is a car too close and he needs to drag it out in the street. Autonomous trash trucks won't handle that.

      Sure they will. They just won't pick those cans up. Then it will be up to the owners of the cans to work out a solution with their neighbors to ensure that there's enough space to position the can for pickup.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    24. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by swillden · · Score: 1

      There are still some places where two or three men work each truck, where one drives and one or two manually dump the tenants' or residents' own cans instead of a standardized can supplied by the municipality

      The City of Atlanta supplies standardized cans but still has guys on the truck manually emptying them. Maybe that's why trash pickup costs almost $50/month (for a single-family residence) here.

      Why don't you decline the service then and handle it yourself by driving to the dump every week? Or move to a place that doesn't mind if people let flies and maggots accumulate on their trash in their own yard, aka not require trash service?

      Or get the city to improve their trash collection process to use fewer people and cost less money. The service in my town costs $15 per month for weekly pickup. No flies and maggots, no trash accumulation, and less than one-third the price. $50 per month is outrageous.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    25. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "standardized bin" you speak of. I assume it's provided to you at no cost ? If not, I hope you have the option of using your own containers?

      Little line-items like this are exactly why I'm pushing to get as far from the HOA lifestyle as possible. I own a dozen containers already, I don't see why I need to buy another to be able to provide garbage to a (same cost as every competitor) specially-chosen waste disposal utility hand-chosen by a town because they will standardize. Let me keep my low property taxes, you keep your bin which matches your neighbors'.

      I think this will require a bit more tech in in the old/real suburbs, where people can't afford (or can't stand) excessive standardization...

    26. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Looks like Joe_Dragon's forgot his password.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    27. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but in suburban and rural areas this really wouldn't be that necessary. As long as there's room for a standardized bin to be wheeled to the street by the tenant or resident of the property then the trash truck is capable of automatically picking up the can and dumping its contents so long as the driver stops the truck at the right spot.

      There are still some places where two or three men work each truck, where one drives and one or two manually dump the tenants' or residents' own cans instead of a standardized can supplied by the municipality, but I suspect those are more due to negotiated rules between the unions and the waste management services; the unions want to keep their people employed and the service doesn't want to spend $300,000 per truck to replace their old manual truck that still run with new automated trucks, so they keep the existing system in place.

      Makes me wonder how easy it would be to automate trash collection from high density areas though, where each building and possibly each floor would have its own unique method for placing trash for collection. It might require standardization, to a degree, on the part of the residents.

      Non of you guys have to contend with snow storms, snow banks, and just poor access to the curb in winter. As well, the problem of car owners deciding to park between what is the bin and the automated truck with the bin-lifter.

      Solve the ice and snow problems first.

    28. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are still some places where two or three men work each truck, where one drives and one or two manually dump the tenants' or residents' own cans instead of a standardized can supplied by the municipality

      The City of Atlanta supplies standardized cans but still has guys on the truck manually emptying them. Maybe that's why trash pickup costs almost $50/month (for a single-family residence) here.

      Why don't you decline the service then and handle it yourself by driving to the dump every week?
      Or move to a place that doesn't mind if people let flies and maggots accumulate on their trash in their own yard, aka not require trash service?

      Or get the city to improve their trash collection process to use fewer people and cost less money. The service in my town costs $15 per month for weekly pickup. No flies and maggots, no trash accumulation, and less than one-third the price. $50 per month is outrageous.

      Providing unconnected figures is meaningless in a vacuum. How much do you think a dozen eggs and a quart of milk should cost? Should it cost the same in Atlanta as it does in Alaska, Hawaii, or a big dairy state like NY? How about on the space shuttle while in orbit?

      I'll bet the price of a house where you live is half the price of downtown Atlanta too, which is way less than half of what it is in downtown NYC.

      Your problem is assuming you know the "correct" cost/value of trash pickup in Atlanta, despite not living in Atlanta, because your cost is lower. You don't specify where you live though. Downtown Atlanta is denser than the burbs, much less rural ButteFuque Nevada. That impacts the cost of wages, equipment, safety standards and emission/disposal costs.

    29. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Or get the city to improve their trash collection process to use fewer people and cost less money. The service in my town costs $15 per month for weekly pickup. No flies and maggots, no trash accumulation, and less than one-third the price. $50 per month is outrageous.

      Providing unconnected figures is meaningless in a vacuum. How much do you think a dozen eggs and a quart of milk should cost? Should it cost the same in Atlanta as it does in Alaska, Hawaii, or a big dairy state like NY?

      Sure, costs vary. But 3X, for the same service in roughly the same context (single-family house), indicates a problem.

      I'll bet the price of a house where you live is half the price of downtown Atlanta too

      No, housing prices are pretty comparable.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    30. Re:Maybe for urban areas... by mc551995 · · Score: 0

      Robots are the better future for us. We can't live without this technology. So, be with it and welcoming the future.

  2. Ignorance is bliss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get that past the unions and city contractors.

    1. Re:Ignorance is bliss by TWX · · Score: 2

      If the union leadership is smart they'll see that the automation is coming regardless, and will work toward a solution that slowly replaces workers as they retire with mechanization instead of one day the parent organization lays-off the entire union when the brand new fleet of autonomous machines appears. The Union can also migrate toward organization of the maintenance staff that take care of the machines, which will require their own specific kinds of maintenance, and are also probably somewhat better paying jobs that simply operating the trucks are.

      Some unions over time have had the foresight to do this while others have not. It's bad for a society to have a lot of unemployed, probably worse than having inefficiency in the system due to outmoded practices.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re: Ignorance is bliss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporate America doesn't care.

    3. Re:Ignorance is bliss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't imagine this being a concern in New Jersey. Trash is largely privatized across mafia concerns, rather than unions. Or am I repeating myself?

    4. Re:Ignorance is bliss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But think of all the time that these laidoff workers will have to innovate and create jobs and stuff now that they don't have to pick up garbage. Er....something like that.

  3. Yeah, but... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From TFS:

    It's struck me, too, how the trash collection vehicles that come by my house are mostly piloted robots already; the humans are there to deal with problems and control the joysticks, but hydraulic arms lift and empty the garbage containers themselves.

    Where I am, the human drives the truck, gets it lined up with the can, etc. If some asshat homeowner puts the bin out too far from the curb, or turned "wrong" (sideways or backwards or not mostly square to the road), said worker has to hop out and get the bin in position for the arms to grab, slaps teh big red button on the side of the truck, and the hydraulics/mechanics/robotics take over from there.

    The human is still needed for the fuzzy logic stuff - driving, checking distance of the bin to the road, orientation of the bin, etc - but with a halfway considerate homeowner they don't need to get out of the truck that often. Big change from the "hop out, toss 2 full cans up and dump 'em in, compact it, head to next set of cans" model that was around a few years back...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by CastrTroy · · Score: 3

      You pinpointed the reason this will never work. It's too much trouble for the home owner. We can't even get people to recycle and compost in my area, because the people who own the houses would rather just throw everything in a single bin. Having automated pickup is going to cause so many more problems. If the trash doesn't get picked up because the robot didn't like the orientation of the bin, do you have to wait another week for the garbage to get picked up? What happens when you have a little bit more garbage than usual and you can't fit it all in the standard bin?

      We actually have the mechanical arms and standardized bins for compost, and they never use them. The guys doing the pickup have figured out it's much easier just to do it by hand. They can get the route done in less time and have more time to enjoy themselves.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just roll it back against the curb. How hard can it be? I've never seen anybody in my neighborhood screw that up.

      Where I live there are two trucks - one for the normal bin and one for the recycle bin. I try to help out the drivers by leaving a few feet of space between the bins so they don't have to aim as carefully. It's still dark when they're working.

    3. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck fuckity moron shit balls!

      Grow up.

    4. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know these bins and automated arms already exist right? and they aren't causing near as many problems as you seem to think they are.

      Perhaps you should leave the basement and see what the world is like before assuming everyone on the internet is stupider than you...

      p.s. I live in an area with snow, frequently snow banks of hard packed snow 3-4 feet tall on the side of the road... trash cans simply get put on the driveway which has to be cleared any how to get in and out of the driveway.

    5. Re:Yeah, but... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Not where I am, if you don't put the can out properly they don't pick it up and you are stuck until next week. People figure it out real quick!

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    6. Re:Yeah, but... by c · · Score: 1

      What happens when you have a little bit more garbage than usual and you can't fit it all in the standard bin?

      Places with recycling programs have a worse problem.

      Our previous municipality did curbside recycle sorting. We'd put stuff out already separated (although I suspect this wasn't a common practice; we just had extra bins), but they still had to dig through and pull out non-recyclables and handle mixups, plus plastic bags were handled separately, not to mention broken down cardboard boxes.

      Our current municipality just wants everything in clear bags, except plastic bags are in a separate bag, and large cardboard gets bundled separately; detailed sorting happens at a different facility. I don't expect we'd ever have a composting program (we're rural), but a single compost bin would be trivial to automate compared to a decent recycling program.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    7. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You aren't wrong, but you are a total douchebag,

    8. Re:Yeah, but... by sjames · · Score: 1

      If you don't orient the can reasonably properly, it gets left there. You will have to store it till the next pickup. Eventually, the smelly garbage encourages you to try orienting the can properly.

    9. Re:Yeah, but... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      There are no 'precise specfications' for alignment. There is printing on the bin that says 'This side toward street'. My trash has been picked up this way for more than a decade, never seen any problems with it, even in snow.

    10. Re:Yeah, but... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      You don't live in my area. Based on the smelly crap that gets left, even with human workers, the people clearly don't have a sense of smell.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    11. Re:Yeah, but... by jay+age · · Score: 1

      Actually, I always though that would be a great use for robots, trash separation.

      As you say, you just don't get the people to recycle properly. We're likely to never get them to do it, so why not instead try developing robots with advanced vision and other sensors to recognize different types of trash, and nimble "hands" to sort them as they enter waste processing plants?

      It is certainly a hard problem both from SW and HW point of view, but worth solving.

    12. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're system can't deal with the fact

      "your".

  4. Stupid Humans and Trash Management by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Since majority of the people in my apartment complex are STUPID when it comes to the recycling and garbage dumpster (i.e., posted signs routinely ignored), the leasing office hired a contracting firm to have several people sort, breakdown and distribute the contents of each dumpsters in the morning hours. Recyclables go into the recyclables dumpster, garbage into the garbage dumpster, and inappropriate items (i.e., one-gallon bottle of motor oil or piss) are dealt with in an appropriate manner. Looking forward to that extra surcharge to sewer and garbage bill.

    1. Re:Stupid Humans and Trash Management by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer it if they'd figure who the shitbird is who keeps dumping trash in the glass recycling bin and deal with him directly.

      I mean for fuck's sake, the glass bin is *right next to* the the goddamned trash bin.

      I can almost understand the laziness that keep people from sorting thier trash and recyclables, but for the love of Cthulhu, if you're not going to, at least put your goddamned trash in the trash bin so that the rest of us don't have to suffer your stupidity. Seriously, I'm about the laziest person in the world, and even I manage to sort my shit into the correct bin.

    2. Re:Stupid Humans and Trash Management by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      My apartment complex has 320 units, 600+ tenants, 20 dumpsters and four homeless scavengers on bicycles. Unless they put video cameras on all the dumpsters, it's very difficult to determine who is doing what with their trash.

  5. It could work on my street by Rob+Lister · · Score: 1

    It could work on my street, mostly. I live on a street with a court and at the end the truck typically has to reverse/forward/reverse/forward to get in a position where the hydraulic lift can pick up my container and get it dumped. There are situations where the containers are not properly positioned (backward, sideways, obstructions, etc) and make it impossible for the truck to get to the container and they guy will actually get out and re-position the container so as to get at it. But since the city is the one picking it up, they could just forego getting those. The owners will quickly learn their lesson. Or sue city hall.

  6. Pixar to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Robots' Next Big Job: Trash Pickup

    That's not a big job, that's a cosmic job! Wall-E and EVE will have to screw a lot of robo-kids together to amass an army of cleaners which can cope with such a herculean task ... so we may sit.

  7. They've already taken... by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

    digging ditches for a living. See Bertha Seattle.

  8. robot arm in truck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the newest garabage trucks had an arm on the truck to pick up the garabage can. The arm is controlled by the driver, with a joystick. Is the purpose to keep the human from having to push the bin out to the curb?

    1. Re:robot arm in truck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lazy morons is the simple explanation I believe (at least for the most part). Yes the trucks with a robotic arm have definitely helped decrease the manual labor on the garbage trucks end but a lot of people fail to place the standardized cans in the proper location/orientation and there are probably still more complaints about the fact that they have to wheel the bins out to the curb. The intent here seems to be to take the homeowner out of the loop as well.

  9. City of Walla Walla - Garbage Collection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The City of Walla Walla seem to have got that up and running 5 years ago
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWTbsHVCawQ

  10. UrbanMech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They'll have to call it the UrbanMech...

  11. Just tell the robots by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    "... or you don't get no spending cash"

    Presumably robots can't talk back anyway.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    1. Re:Just tell the robots by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Yackety yack!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  12. Oh No! by PPH · · Score: 1

    Now there's no hope of Slashdotters ever getting a date.

    Robot sidles up to some suitably trashy female in a bar: "Say, baby (beep). Do (click, click) you come here often (modem noises)?"

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  13. might not work in bigger cities. by nimbius · · Score: 2

    from tfa the mockup shows a typical suburb, but in a city collecting trash is much more complex. offices and apartment complexes often store their dumpsters in the buildings parking garage or in a tight alleyway. garbage trucks cant get to them directly, and so rely on smaller positioning vehicles to take the dumpster to a location the truck can safely reach. on large streets, dumpsters can take up an entire lane of traffic or parking while waiting for a garbage pickup. at the end of the day, positioning vehicles return the dumpster to its original location.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:might not work in bigger cities. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Not "might not". Will not, can not, was never going to except in the mind of the idiot who thought it would. And it won't work in suburbs either.

      Any marvelous technology which assumes the world will be redesigned around that marvelous technology is not marvelous technology. It's crap, and will never happen.

      It's a designer or a futurist telling us how they've come up with a really elegant solution, and then complaining the world is too disorganized for your elegant solution to work.

      Now, if we could just come up with an elegant solution to the fact that every posting from Nerval's Lobster links to Dice.com because he's apparently a paid shill they refuse to acknowledge.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  14. Public Safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many robots are going to notice living beings or formerly living beings in trash cans before disposal?

  15. Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I live in an urban area, and unfortunately there has been an influx of hipsters over the last three or four years. If you aren't aware, hipsters tend to not have kids. Instead they own dogs. Not just one or two dogs, but sometimes three or four dogs. Since they live in loft apartments without yards, they just let their dogs shit outside. Being the products of suburbia, these hipsters tend not to know how to do something as basic as pick up dog shit with a scoop, or even a bag over their hand.

    So our public areas are now covered in dog shit. It's all over the place. It's on the sidewalks. It's on park benches. It's hidden in the grass. It's tracked all over the place by innocent victims who accidentally have stepped in it.

    Getting these hipsters to clean up their dogs' shit isn't going to happen. I'm not even certain that they can bend down that far, given how tight their jeans are, especially on the men with the fanciest artisanal moustaches. They won't give up their dogs, either, because these are their "fur babies".

    We need robots that could come along and automatically clean up the dog shit that's all over the place. Then it can dispose of it by sneaking up behind these hipsters, and smearing the shit all over the backs and clothes of these hipsters.

    Those are the kinds of robots we need!

    1. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      timed honored solution to that problem. shoot their damn dogs

    2. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by TWX · · Score: 2

      All the world seems in tune on a spring afternoon
      When we're poisoning pigeons^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcanines in the park
      Every Sunday you'll see my sweetheart and me
      As we poison the pigeons^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcanines in the park...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't possibly be a real person! It's like a caricature of someone so destroyed by that which they hate, that they become an even greater evil. Your hatred of hipsters has caused you to become a vile, filth-spewing menace to polite society.

    4. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by TWX · · Score: 1

      You can't possibly be a real person! It's like a caricature of someone so destroyed by that which they hate, that they become an even greater evil. Your hatred of hipsters has caused you to become a vile, filth-spewing menace to polite society.

      Penny Arcade had something to say on this kind of thing. Sad thing is that they're right.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People hate you and your kind because you let your dogs defecate all over the place. It's a behavior that is sub-human, unsanitary, and not acceptable in any civilized society.

    6. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by sconeu · · Score: 1

      +1 classic Tom Lehrer

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    7. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here.. we have bylaw officers. They write tickets, and from the sounds of it, their salary would be 100% paid, maybe even 10x over, by these tickets.

      Once a few $400 tickets are had, word gets around too.

    8. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the dog's fault - shoot the goddamned hipster owner instead.

    9. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      shoot the goddamned hipster owner instead.

      Slavery is detestable, to be sure, but the problem isn't hipster owners. The problem is hipster owners who let their hipsters outside and don't clean up after their mess. If they keep their hipsters indoors and train them well, they'll eventually mature into productive adults at some point in their 30s or 40s.

    10. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by jbengt · · Score: 1

      I live in an urban area, and unfortunately there has been an influx of hipsters over the last three or four years. . . .Getting these hipsters to clean up their dogs' shit isn't going to happen. It's all over the place.

      B.S. I grew up in an urban area and lived there for decades. I can tell you unequivocally that the dogshit was there before the hipsters arrived.

    11. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting these hipsters to clean up their dogs' shit isn't going to happen
      This is an *easy* problem to fix.

      Dead easy. Sweet talk your local police dept. Have them send someone out for a day or two. Hand out a zillion fines for littering. Problem is cleaned up PDQ.

      Problem comes up again sweet talk your local police again.

      They are littering plain and simple. For dog shit the fine is probably higher.

    12. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by Toshito · · Score: 1

      Being hipsters, I'm surprised they didn't pick up their dog's poop before it was cool.

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    13. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preach it brother!

      I live in N. Hipsterville myself. Plenty of couples pretending to be mommy and daddy. I don't have a dog; don't want a dog because they're filthy. My problem is I live near a parkway where everyone feels obligated to "exercise" their dog. So the ones that do pick up, will throw their dog shit in my garbage cans so that I get a nice little surprise when I open it to drop my garbage.

      You'd think that a garbage can couldn't get any more foul than with garbage in it. Well i learn differently.

    14. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shoot the goddamned hipster owner instead.

      Slavery is detestable, to be sure, but the problem isn't hipster owners. The problem is hipster owners who let their hipsters outside and don't clean up after their mess. If they keep their hipsters indoors and train them well, they'll eventually mature into productive adults at some point in their 30s or 40s.

      I always point out to dog owners that their dog's love for them is nothing more than Stockholm Syndrome. They own a pet, a social animal, that they then deprive of the companionship it so desperately needs. Keep said animal in isolation for at least 8 hours a day. The same animal is only fed when an "owner" is around so that they are associated with food (meaning good things). All so that the owner can have someone love them.

      And those are the good owners.

      I don't like PeTA in the least, but I think they're right on this one. We shouldn't own pets for our own pleasure.

    15. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      murder is wrong, even of hipster trash, but mashing a hipsters face in their own dog's feces may not be so wrong. what are they going to do, try to beat you up with bean sprout, cauliflower, and ramps fed muscles?

    16. Re:Pick up dog shit in urban areas. by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      Wow, I would give you a million mod points if I had them. Best post ever.

  16. Will it be followed by a robot cleanup crew? by jandrese · · Score: 1

    Trash collection is notoriously messy. There are few standards that people have to follow with packing their trash can and place it on the curb. Even if they do follow directions, there are a lot of factors to account for. This is a hard problem for robots, and they're going to get it wrong sometimes. Are they going to include a cleanup robot that will follow the truck and pick up any messes?

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  17. Unfair by vikingpower · · Score: 2

    Where I live (a rather affluent suburb of Vienna, Austria) trash collection is done by unskilled, lowly-educated workers who don't have much chance at any other type of job. I would hate to think of these poor people being pushed out of about the only job they could get by... robots.

    There definitely is an ethical side to employing - or not employing - robots. I truly do hope we get that one right, for once.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Unfair by Rob+Lister · · Score: 1

      So ... charity?

    2. Re:Unfair by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Where I live (a rather affluent suburb of Vienna, Austria) trash collection is done by unskilled, lowly-educated workers who don't have much chance at any other type of job. I would hate to think of these poor people being pushed out of about the only job they could get by... robots.

      There definitely is an ethical side to employing - or not employing - robots. I truly do hope we get that one right, for once.

      Don't worry. If /. has taught us anything, it's that there will be plenty of jobs services those robots to replace the ones they take away.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    3. Re:Unfair by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, soon enough your job will be outsourced to high productivity systems, robots, etc;
      This change and pace of technological change is inevitable, and is what should really be discussed now while we still have a chance.
      There seems to be this smug self importance to many that post on this site thinking they can't be touched by the oncoming wave.

      They are planning on having computer systems do air traffic control. No that won't remove all the human jobs in that area, but most of them. Pilots? Fast-Food cooks and cashiers? Trash collectors?

      When self driving tech really gets going in 10-20 years from now think about how many delivery and driving jobs will disappear?

      When agriculture harvesting tech really gets going think about how many immigrant farm workers will be out of work?

      The real question is, how will human society deal with millions or billions permanently out of work?

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    4. Re:Unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately the proposed upgrades would only shrink the workforce, for now. Slightly. Absolute zero is some entitled 1%'ers fantasy. Even edge-to-edge solo robo is a long time before being cost-efficient. They won't be deployed any time soon; even the hydraulic arms aren't universal yet.

      The biggest culling from the paycheck club already happened.

    5. Re:Unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same arguments have been brought up at the advent of every piece of automation that has come into being (cotton processing, sewing, crop harvesting, manufacturing, buggy whip manufacturing, etc) and yet somehow society has adjusted each time improving quality of life for everyone. I'm sure there is some tipping point where the the created issues outweigh the benefits but if the past few hundred years is if any indication we humans are REALLY bad at predicting that point.

    6. Re:Unfair by ibpooks · · Score: 1

      In addition to the parent's point, humans picking up the garbage provides a much better service than the robot trucks. I don't have to worry about fitting everything into the uniform sized plastic bin. I can pile whatever oddly shaped boxes, cans or large items by the road, and the humans can deal with them quickly and efficiently. I don't really care if it makes trash hauling slightly more expensive, it makes my job of taking out the trash much easier. I live in an area where humans pick up the trash, and basically whatever I can drag to the curb, they will throw in the truck. It would be such a pain in the ass to try to smash boxes or break up old furniture to fit inside the can. Let the hydraulic ram on the truck do that.

    7. Re:Unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I hate to think what missed opportunities you have BECAUSE these people are doing low end labour, instead of doing what they are capable of.

      Low end work should go to the robots, and we should implement guaranteed basic income, and then eventually, people could be doing what they WANT to do instead of what they HAVE to do.

      We'd have more painters, musicians, scientists, educators, and doctors, and less ditch diggers and garbage men in that kind of world.

    8. Re:Unfair by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Trash collection is a smell, undesirable job. If you're doing a make-work program, why not make it something pleasant?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    9. Re:Unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same arguments have been brought up at the advent of every piece of automation that has come into being (cotton processing, sewing, crop harvesting, manufacturing, buggy whip manufacturing, etc) and yet somehow society has adjusted each time improving quality of life for everyone. I'm sure there is some tipping point where the the created issues outweigh the benefits but if the past few hundred years is if any indication we humans are REALLY bad at predicting that point.

      Fair enough.

      That said, technology has been accelerating & I suspect that we are beginning to reach levels of automation that are wildly beyond the ability of society to adjust to easily. I wonder what the unemployment rate will be in 2050.

      IMO, we should be trying to figure out what a society with very low employment would look like & how we could transition to it.

      I'm not advocating it, I just suspect that's where we're headed in the next 50 years, so we should have a better response than "let 'em starve" (or let them die from easily curable/preventable illnesses).

      Anyways, I hope I'm wrong. Otherwise things are going to be very, very nasty.

    10. Re:Unfair by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Who says that any trash collector could be educated to be a "painter, musician, scientist, educator or doctor" ? That is quite a bold assumption, sirrah!

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    11. Re:Unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Football player: Guy who runs around at top speed on a field getting crashed into by huge men.
      Baseball player: Guy who hits a ball with a bat and has to run around at top speed while people try to touch him with the ball later.
      Astronaut: Guy who rides around in a cramped space station enduring nauseating weightlessness, cramped living quarters, separated from certain death by a thin wall of lightweight material.
      Software engineer: Guy who spends hours sitting in front of a computer deciphering the arcane scrawlings of a UX "expert".
      Dentist: Guy who has to mess around with peoples' nasty-ass teeth and explain to them like children why their breath smells like ass.
      Rock musician: Spend all your money on gear, play in bars trying to get someone's attention, get odd looks from family, no love from girls.

      These are the pleasant jobs that people practice all their lives (and spend big for educations in most cases) for. If you want to be more than a garbage collector, you have to work for it.

  18. Re:Robot's next big job: a donkey bot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's bone.

  19. GIF is relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:GIF is relevant by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Thanks that was funny.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    2. Re:GIF is relevant by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      As funny as that was, the problem there was the homeowner placed the bin facing the wrong way. That's trivially easy for a human to identify and correct, but for an automated system somebody has to think through how to deal with all the permutations of that problem and include a solution in the operation logic.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re: GIF is relevant by slick7 · · Score: 1

      That's trivially easy for a human to identify and correct, but for an automated system somebody has to think through how to deal with all the permutations of that problem and include a solution in the operation logic.
      Circular cans! Who'd da thunk it? A detent to orient the lid.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    4. Re: GIF is relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell yes, a circular can. Put something on it so the robot can pull the lid off, dump the can, and put it back on.

  20. This Has All Happened Before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First we built the Cylons to perform tasks that were too 'dirty' for man. Then we programmed them to fight our wars for us.

  21. Life is not fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is only an ethical issue if your a hardcore capitalist. Automating trash collection does not lesson the worlds ability to feed/cloth/support the worlds population. It just pushes economies into historically corrupt centrally planned systems. Once you make the decision that your paying low education workers regardless of their efficiency there is no reason to have them do demeaning jobs like trash collection. They could be doing an infinite number of other things that your unwilling to pay for.

  22. Surprised by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    I was shocked to see a garbage truck that had the ability to rip washing machines, mattresses and old cabinets and pull in the shards. It did have human workers but that truck was designed to get rid of anything that a home might have with ease and efficiency.

    1. Re: Surprised by slick7 · · Score: 1

      ...but that truck was designed to get rid of anything that a home might have with ease and efficiency.
      Kids, mother-in-law, too many cats next door...

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  23. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My city uses prisoners to dump the cans, while a guard of some kind drives the truck. There could be some downsides to this, but it gives the inmates something to do rather than hang around the jail.

    I've lived here for 20 years and have yet to hear about any trying to escape, so there must be a nice incentive to do the job.

  24. Who's going to work on them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my area I see the same trash company advertising for diesel mechanics all the time. I pointed this ad out to my brother who happened to be looking for a job as a diesel mechanic. It turns out that when you work under a trash truck that all of the assorted goo from the trash pickup from the last week is falling down on you. Of all the other goo from a normal truck, trash truck goo is about as bad as it gets.

    So... of the high tech technicians that would be working on robots, who do you think they will find to work on trash robots?

  25. garbage by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It's struck me, too, how the trash collection vehicles that come by my house are mostly piloted robots already; the humans are there to deal with problems and control the joysticks, but hydraulic arms lift and empty the garbage containers themselves.

    Piloted robots? You mean machines? By that logic the self-driving car has been here for a century, since you don't have to put your feet through the floor and push.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  26. +1 Artful Double-Entendre by Lotharus · · Score: 1

    No mod points... Nice work!