Slashdot Mirror


Lenovo Collects Usage Data On ThinkPad, ThinkCentre and ThinkStation PCs

New submitter LichtSpektren writes: Following up Lenovo's blunders regarding the Superfish malware and altered BIOS, Michael Horowitz at ComputerWorld reports that a refurbished ThinkPad he bought includes Lenovo spyware under the guise of "Customer Feedback". After some digging around, he found the following in a support document: "Lenovo says here that all ThinkPad, ThinkCentre and ThinkStation PCs, running Windows 7 and 8.1, may upload 'non-personal and non-identifying information about Lenovo software application usage' to 112.2o7.net."

134 comments

  1. Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Didn't we all agree the other day that ThinkPads are for running Linux?

    1. Re:Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why do they ship with Windows?

    2. Re:Windows? by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

      For the same reason they ship in styrofoam. You want something nice and bloaty with no real substance to keep it safe.

    3. Re:Windows? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      For the same reason they ship in styrofoam. You want something nice and bloaty with no real substance to keep it safe.

      Packing peanuts for your disk sectors!

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    4. Re:Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Didn't we all agree the other day that ThinkPads are for running Linux?

      We sure did. I can attest: T-series Thinkpads are *excellent* for that. As far as Windows goes, we've already been hearing about the phoning home it's doing in Windows 10 and the hotfixes for versions 7 and 8. The best thing you can do with a Windows PC: install Linux and run that instead.

    5. Re:Windows? by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Ill have to remember that one!

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    6. Re:Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck with that, drunk ass Grandpa!

    7. Re:Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Didn't we all agree the other day that ThinkPads are for running Linux?

      We sure did. I can attest: T-series Thinkpads are *excellent* for that. As far as Windows goes, we've already been hearing about the phoning home it's doing in Windows 10 and the hotfixes for versions 7 and 8. The best thing you can do with a Windows PC: install Linux and run that instead.

      Spot on. Some variants even come with a customized version of Ubuntu pre-installed, which uses some binary blob drivers that are actually inferior to the Linux native ones. Then you wipe and install your $favorate_distro knowing that the hardware will be well supported. I don't know whether they still sell the models any more. Back then I chose them for excellent Linux compatibility and no MS-tax.

      Also their form design is fairly friendly to lightweight DIY repair. It's easy to tear down and put back. The keyboard can be easily detached and replaced. At least easier than with HP or Dell...

      But they seem to be going down the crap road in recent years, and Linux hardware support has progressed so much that most hardware now works "out of the box", so they're losing that advantage. There's no point of supporting this leech company any more.

    8. Re:Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why do they ship with Windows?

      Because people will pay for windows even if they're not going to use it at all. So why to stop this profitable business if nobody objects?

    9. Re:Windows? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Sod Linux I have Android running on mine :)

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    10. Re: Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't 112.207.net the M$ analytic domain?

    11. Re:Windows? by steveg · · Score: 1

      Paying for Windows is cheaper than not paying for Linux.

      If they pre-installed Linux on it, they wouldn't have any bloatware available to defray the cost of the installation.

      I don't know about Lenovo, but back when you could still get Linux pre-installed on a Dell, it cost more than the same hardware with Windows. Bloatware companies pay the vendors to include their crap, and it more than pays for the Windows license.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  2. Why do they think this is okay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't Lenovo read the news? There has been a big on big spying organizations lately... Don't they have to know that eventually they're going to be caught doing this eventually and there will be negative coverage? That the more they do this, the more of a reputation the company gets that Lenovo == spying on you?

    Doesn't this deter corporations who may have trade secrets or other concerns about security from bulk-purchasing Lenovo in the future? Doesn't it turn their brand into shit? Do they really want to see #fuck-lenovo-spyware trend on Twitter?

    (You know what to do.)

    I don't get the calculus they're making. What returns do they get vs. the costs when they get called out for doing this?!

    1. Re:Why do they think this is okay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i things do this to their users all the time, and nobody raises an eye. Even when it turns out there was tracking going on even with the GPS subsystem turned off a couple years ago, nobody batted an eye (some even came to defend it).

      Big businesses are finally realizing that there's a lot of shit you can get away with if you either hide it from your users (thing about it: Volvo is a multinational corporation with many 3rd party repairmen that could have easily noticed a problem, but it took over 5 years. Imagine what a locked down hardware/software combo could hide?

      So to answer your question, they have nothing to lose. The fine they get slapped with will be 1-10% of their profits, and the publicity of "oh, we're sorry, we won't do it again" will make that up in spades.

    2. Re:Why do they think this is okay? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Volvo or Volkwagen? What's happened with Volvo?

    3. Re: Why do they think this is okay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because if everyone is spying on you it doesn't matter anymore! NSA (and others intelligence agencies as well) is spying on you, Google collect your data, Apple too, Sony, Toshiba, Samsung and VISA and Mastercard and your local grocery store. Everybody out there is trying to collect as many informations they can, because you are a walking bag of money and everything you buy, eat, read, watch and desire can give them hints on how to grab that money. Peace.

    4. Re: Why do they think this is okay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing about it!

    5. Re:Why do they think this is okay? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Lenovo read the news?

      yeah two years ago they hopped in their time machine to read yesterday's news

    6. Re: Why do they think this is okay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Chinese military says "do it for our chilren"

    7. Re:Why do they think this is okay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be 'Noxwagen' now I think

  3. no more lenovo stories... we get it... don't buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    don't buy lenovo... we get it.

  4. Dirty move by Lenovo by acoustix · · Score: 2

    I realize that most business models are usually wiped/imaged anyway, but this is more disgusting behavior by Lenovo. Stuff like this will keep me from buying and recommending their products.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Lenovo didn't do that already with their adware?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      according to whois, that ip belongs to Adobe.?!

    3. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by mc551995 · · Score: 0

      I never use Lenovo laptop in my whole life. I must say ek try tho banta hai boss.

    4. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by Ravaldy · · Score: 0

      It would appear their Thinkpad aren't affected (not sure if I read that correctly). If true that provides some relief since I've been buying nothing but Lenovo laptops as I found their build quality to be superior. On a side note, we RE-IMAGE all laptops with our standard corporate setup so this is more or less an issue.

      My question to companies that do this is: WHY? Is there not enough money in the sales of the hardware?

    5. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They seem to be using Omniture as their spyware toolkit. I don't know what the Windows version of Omniture collects, but the Android version at least tries to squeeze every piece of information of the device. And they actively try to enforce application developer to track every click on screen. Of course, as part of Adobe family of quality software, it is buggy as hell, so it can be exploited at will.

    6. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would appear their Thinkpad aren't affected (not sure if I read that correctly).

      The title, it's there for you to read.

    7. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by khellendros1984 · · Score: 2

      WHY? Is there not enough money in the sales of the hardware?

      PC hardware is fairly low-margin and has been for a long time. Manufacturers look for anything they can find to bump their profits up. Often that includes a bunch of "trialware", "partner offers", and other crap preloaded on the machine. There's been a certain amount of backlash from customers about easily-visible adware like that, so it makes some sense that Lenovo would try to get the same benefits by hiding it on the computer instead.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    8. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone does this kind of crap, its just Lenovo are the ones getting caught.

      I wipe every machine I buy, regardless of where it came from.

    9. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by FranTaylor · · Score: 2

      I realize that most business models are usually wiped/imaged anyway

      how many times do I have to post this link:

      https://thehackernews.com/2015/08/lenovo-rootkit-malware.html

      "Lenovo Caught Using Rootkit to Secretly Install Unremovable Software"

    10. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 2

      I realize that most business models are usually wiped/imaged anyway, but this is more disgusting behavior by Lenovo. Stuff like this will keep me from buying and recommending their products.

      I know it's cool to get outraged, and I'm certainly not comfortable with spying in general, but I actually read the article and it's kind of weird.

      It's repeatedly iterated that the feedback tool gathers information on Lenovo's own software only. Lenovo business machines don't ship with much. There's a more flexible power-manager, a tool that checks if your hardware is falling part (does memory tests, hard drive SMART tests etc periodically), and a tool that makes it easy to download updated drivers and BIOS. There's typically not much that has what you'd think of as "data".

      Sure, it's valuable to Lenovo to know how many people disable the scheduled hardware tests, or opt to remove the bundled AV software immediately upon install. It's valuable to them to know how often people use their System Update to keep up-to-date, and how often all of this stuff simply doesn't work. Even knowing the average user's preference in power management settings is useful.

      While it's entirely possible that this is also gathering things it shouldn't, by and large this all seems a case of "should not care".

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    11. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      It would appear their Thinkpad aren't affected

      Just checked my Thinkpad, it's infected. OTOH now I know about it, removal instructions are pretty straightforward, run taskschd.msc, open the Lenovo | LSC entry, delete the three "Lenovo Customer Feedback" entries.

    12. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Lenovo isn't the only one doing this, it's standard industry practice. Back in the bad old days software would crash a lot, and a lot of it was never used anyway, and developers were largely clueless about how it. Hence the rise of "value added" bloatware, offering features that no-one wants. By sending back a bit of telemetry the manufacturers soon realized that people uninstall or disable most of it, so started to cut down. Lenovo is actually one of the best in this regard - their business machines are relatively bloat free.

      While I personally would disable this stuff, it is unfortunately the price we pay for modern tech. As a developer I can tell you that having some telemetry feeding data back, anonymous data, is incredibly helpful and produces better products. What we need to is to have a more open discussion about it, and be really clear about exactly what data is transmitted and how it is protected.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's valuable to Lenovo to know how many people disable the scheduled hardware tests, or opt to remove the bundled AV software immediately upon install. It's valuable to them to know how often people use their System Update to keep up-to-date, and how often all of this stuff simply doesn't work. Even knowing the average user's preference in power management settings is useful.

      There's no question this data is of value to them. It's also none of their goddamned business.

    14. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Good to know. I checked and ours don't have them because of the corporate image we slap on it.

    15. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      While I personally would disable this stuff, it is unfortunately the price we pay for modern tech.

      That's the point... it shouldn't be the price we pay for modern tech. It's truly sad that I have to treat every piece of software or hardware as the enemy these days, and have to set up my firewall to prevent all outgoing traffic that I don't explicitly authorize.

    16. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      I was surprised to find it on mine, it's a business laptop which, so far, hadn't been infected by any of their other stuff. I guessed they didn't want to annoy their business customers, and since they're being paid a premium for the device they don't need to subsidise the cost with bloatware.

    17. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They insisted that Thinkpads were unaffected, and if you were recommending any of their products other than Thinkpads then you weren't thinking straight anyway.

    18. Re:Dirty move by Lenovo by axlworldstore · · Score: 1

      There is lot of model in the world which we never know about that. But This company has manufacture lot of products in market. According to a hardware engineer they manufacture good but this sales going to be down bcos they are not providing hardware warranty like Dell or Toshiba

  5. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's fantastic news. Next up: all EULAs say the software enclosed within is not fit for any purpose and may send your data up to Mars - news for nerds.
    You truly care about security but absolutely need Windows on the host? Wipe the preinstalled software, install a fresh copy, put a firewall+AV on it, don't allow unknown traffic to go out, and that's it.

    1. Re:lol by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      That's fantastic news. Next up: all EULAs say the software enclosed within is not fit for any purpose and may send your data up to Mars - news for nerds.

      Slashdot, Sept 22, 2020

      New startup Yoyodyne Industries releases rock-solid server OS with liberal EULA, quickly rises to 94% market share.

  6. Open Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where is all the open-source "libre" hardware that we were promised 2-to-3 years ago?

    Everything is so locked down, controlled, monitored, and back-doored these days (thanks, smartphones!). Almost every new computer has Intel's AMT integrated into it—a complete computing system within a computing system; it has its own operating system and its own non-volatile ("hard disk") storage, and it's own RAM, and it can access the rest of "your" system even when it is supposedly turned off (though still connected to power, obviously).

    We're totally fubarred.

    What happened to the ARM-based netbooks? What happened to the OpenMokos? What happened to the novenas and the open systems-on-a-chip? All we have is the incomplete Neo900 fanboy club, and FSF's lauded Gluglug x200 junk.

    There is no competition in hardware, anymore. At best, we've got China's Loongson, and even if that shit could be imported from behind the new iron curtain, it's probably backdoored just the same by the "People's" Republic of China.

    We're totally screwed.

    Computing is junk. Ted was right; bomb the lot.

    1. Re:Open Hardware by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

      Where is all the open-source "libre" hardware that we were promised 2-to-3 years ago?

      Software programmers usually don't require very much beyond decent computers and sufficient time. Hardware designers ultimately require silicon fabs - it's expensive to even get production time in one, never mind to own one. And if you end up with a serious bug that didn't show up until the first chips came off the line, then it's big bucks all over again to fix it.

      I have the utmost respect and admiration for those who donate their time and effort to create libre software, and I would never expect them to magically come up with the funds to create open hardware to go along with it. If you're so keen on libre hardware, why don't you get involved, do some research, and maybe start a crowd-funding effort?

      There is no competition in hardware, anymore.

      There is no real competition anywhere anymore, at least among large corporations. The best you'll find is 'co-opetition'. Why? Because so many people keep supporting broken models of governance, (if they bother to think about such things at all), and they keep bending over and lubing up to make it easy for multi-nationals to have their way. They have a captive market, (courtesy of our indifference), so it's both easier and cheaper for them to dispense with real competition altogether and just pay lip service to it instead.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    2. Re:Open Hardware by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      Software programmers usually don't require very much beyond decent computers and sufficient time.

      Knowledge and experience with hardware stuff like NUMA, RDMA, etc. are necessary for server software developers today.

      There is no real competition anywhere anymore, at least among large corporations.

      I'm looking at the newegg.com website right now

      in mini-pc systems there are 9 different vendors
      in laptops systems there are 36 different vendors
      for chromebooks there are 8 different vendors
      for desktops there are 40 different vendors

      this is just the newegg web site

    3. Re:Open Hardware by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      What happened to the ARM-based netbooks? What happened to the OpenMokos? What happened to the novenas and the open systems-on-a-chip? All we have is the incomplete Neo900 fanboy club, and FSF's lauded Gluglug x200 junk.

      Intel knows all about their competitors. They aggressively lowered prices and cut deals and elbowed their way in. Lots and lots of Windows apps will never ever run on anything but x86. There is just no way that ARM can match the value for the money, even if they gave away the chips for free.

    4. Re:Open Hardware by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Where do those "vendors" get their merchandise. (Not that you're necessarily wrong, but your figures are just the first step in the argument. And aren't an argument that addresses the point of the g.p.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  7. And they own Motorola now by surfdaddy · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately I really like the Moto X, but after Lenovo's privacy issues and cavalier attitude, I'm not going to be considering any Motorola products, either. We need to punish companies that treat us like this.

  8. Who's left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What IT professional is still willing to purchase any Lenovo product, be it for personal or enterprise use?

    1. Re:Who's left? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 2

      My employers. The hardware's decent, and they reimage every machine before it's delivered to the office. It's not like one corporation's going to care what another corporation does if it doesn't cause a practical problem (read as: cost them money). An amoral entity can't take a moral stand.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    2. Re:Who's left? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      An amoral entity can't take a moral stand.

      So if a corporation doesn't want its internal data transmitted to Lenovo, that's a moral choice? Sounds like a business choice to me.

    3. Re:Who's left? by FranTaylor · · Score: 2

      My employers. The hardware's decent, and they reimage every machine before it's delivered to the office.

      he he he, they think they are so smart:

      https://thehackernews.com/2015/08/lenovo-rootkit-malware.html

      "Lenovo Caught Using Rootkit to Secretly Install Unremovable Software"

    4. Re:Who's left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An amoral entity can't take a moral stand.

      Of course they can, Hobby Lobby proved that. Praise be, and pass the collection plate at your employer! They need to pay for more of these Chink laptops with god-knows-what permanent rootkits installed on them.

    5. Re:Who's left? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Hobby Lobby's privately held, and primarily by a single family, to a degree that it's difficult to separate the stance of the company from the collective stance of the family members. It's not a good example of an amoral entity.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    6. Re:Who's left? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      LSE's only present in certain models of computer. None of the models in our ordering list are in Lenovo's list.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    7. Re:Who's left? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      An amoral entity can't take a moral stand.

      Apparently not anymore, anyway. Here is a document from ancient history:

      http://www.hpalumni.org/hp_way.htm

      "HP and the HP way"

      We have trust and respect for individuals.
      We focus on a high level of achievement and contribution.
      We conduct our business with uncompromising integrity.
      We achieve our common objectives through teamwork.
      We encourage flexibility and innovation.

      You will recall that HP became an industry leader with these MORAL stances.

    8. Re:Who's left? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      so you actually trust what lenovo tells you, after all this?

    9. Re:Who's left? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      I feel like I already covered the "business choice" aspect. Leaked internal data is likely to be considered a practical problem, since it's likely to eventually cost the company money, in one way or another.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    10. Re:Who's left? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      That's called "marketing". It's bullshit. A publicly-owned company will say anything if it's not illegal to say and they think it will help move more product. That's all the weight that I'd put behind their statements. Even if individuals in leadership of the company make a morally-backed statement on its behalf, it'll renege on it as soon as there seems to be more profit in doing that than in aligning their behavior to the message.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    11. Re:Who's left? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      I feel like I already covered the "business choice" aspect.

      You keep buying computers from a company that uses every trick in the book to slurp your data out of your computer. For the time being you've been able to keep ahead of their behavior. But how long will it last? Is it a "moral" choice to decide that it's not worth the risk anymore?

        What will you say WHEN (not if) you get an email from a security researcher who just found your company's internal data on a chinese server?

    12. Re:Who's left? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Personally? No. We'll see if my employer does next time they select new hardware. On the other hand, LSE's actions are detectable, and its presence can be detected through its actions on the Windows filesystem. I'd argue that no one needs to "trust" Lenovo at all; absence of the rooted firmware should be possible to verify (for instance, by mounting the drive in another vendor's hardware and doing a Windows system file check).

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    13. Re:Who's left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hobby Lobby's privately held, and primarily by a single family, to a degree that it's difficult to separate the stance of the company from the collective stance of the family members. It's not a good example of an amoral entity.

      Are they incorporated? Publicly traded is irrelevant.
      Are corporation people (citizens in terms of legal rights)?
      It enslavement of people illegal?
      The Hobby Lobby is free to come up with its own belief system and shouldn't be forced to obey the shareholders beliefs.

      But F'em if they want tax incentives, because once that happens they are federally funded, because those funds come through the federal government since the city gets funds from feds.
      http://www.havasunews.com/news/council-to-consider-in-tax-incentives-for-hobby-lobby-group/article_c4c88c37-61e9-5641-8697-7c8be76d6a54.html

    14. Re:Who's left? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      Personally? No.

      if you bring your laptop home with you, pull out the battery and put it in a faraday cage before you bring it into your house.

    15. Re:Who's left? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, LSE's actions are detectable

      They've probably already moved on to another technology to slurp your data. it won't be reverse engineered for a while. Your boss can continue to keep his head in the sand at least for the time being.

      by the way, you know that your boss has a whole lot of YOUR personal information in his servers?

    16. Re:Who's left? by FranTaylor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Somehow, we got into a discussion of the responsibility of management. Holden made the point that management's responsibility is to the shareholders – that's the end of it. And I objected. I said, 'I think you're absolutely wrong. Management has a responsibility to its employees, it has a responsibility to its customers, it has a responsibility to the community at large.' And they almost laughed me out of the room."

      - David Packard

    17. Re:Who's left? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely (well, in the literal sense, my boss doesn't, but the company certainly does). The company MitMs all SSL connections (certs are installed into all browsers that mark the company's CA as trusted). They could easily grab my login info for any site I connect to using a computer connected to the company network. That's not even getting into the tax + pay information, my address, phone number, and social security that the company has access to. What's your point? The situation will be similar nearly anywhere.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    18. Re:Who's left? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      I don't know; what will you say WHEN the same happens to you? My employer cares about their data; it keeps them in business. If I'm working for a company that proves incapable of staying in business, I'll find a new employer. If my own information is leaked in a way likely to cause me some form of harm, I'd seek legal counsel to explore my options in that direction.

      "Shit happens". If I worry about everything that every company in the world does wrong, I'll quickly find myself completely unable to function in any meaningful way in society. Sure, I can avoid Lenovo hardware on my own, request Apple hardware for my workstation, install FreeBSD or some other OS that they likely haven't tailored spyware for, etc....and then still lose my bank information to the hacked terminal at the grocery store. To cut to the chase: What is your point?

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    19. Re:Who's left? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      The situation will be similar nearly anywhere.

      Not for companies that don't use Windows for critical IT services

    20. Re:Who's left? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      You mean except for all that Linux-based technology to slurp your data that Lenovo installed that no one has discovered yet, right? ;-) Linux is a great tool, but it's neither infallible nor impregnable. The same applies to any other OS that you could conceivably be talking about.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    21. Re: Who's left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux has a much much much lower malware rate.

    22. Re: Who's left? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      You'll get no argument from me on that point, since it's statistically true. FranTaylor, in a different part of this thread, said something about a Lenovo data breach being a "WHEN (not if)" situation. I'm just pointing out that they can't have it both ways. That is, Linux can't be the malware panacea at the same time that a malware data breach is a foregone conclusion.

      If we're talking about a BIOS-level rootkit though, a secure OS will only be of limited help, and if it were Lenovo's goal to deploy data-gathering software into a Linux system, I don't doubt that it would happen and be just as devastating as it would on Windows.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  9. The average joe vs an enlightened user by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    These companies already know that a computer savvy user won't touch their junk with a 10 ft. pole, while the average Joe doesn't seem to care.
    You could say the average user today is akin to the Indians, will trade away things they don't fully understand like privacy and personal info for a few virtual beads and trinkets.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:The average joe vs an enlightened user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol "enlightened" apparently means "living paranoid under every rock you can find" in your little world huh?

    2. Re:The average joe vs an enlightened user by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      "not wanting your personal data transmitted to Lenovo" apparently means "living paranoid under every rock you can find"?

  10. Slow news day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Breaking news: Lenovo customer feedback software uses Adobe Analytics to analyze customer feedback (http://www.2o7.net)

    Nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:Slow news day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. You're part of the problem; it's useful idiots like you that make such brash behavior "acceptable" in the first place.

      Please, just remove yourself from our society.

    2. Re: Slow news day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No!! NEWS to see here, Pay Attention!

      Some of us work for a living, and this is news on a brand I use to recommend.

      Go back under your bridge, refresh monkey!

  11. Not personally Identifiable; Bullshit it isn't by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 2

    Do these guys not know about information theory or do they simply not care? Give a good demographer a few tiny tidbits (IP Address is often enough) and they have all the personally identifiable information they need. Maybe not enough to convict someone but well enough to be very very sure as to who it is.

    People keep talking about utilities such as ad block and VPNs as being about cleaning up the browser and running torrents but these tools are also about cutting off the marketing and demographics folks from our private lives.

    So when the MBAs at Lenovo think that we won't mind, they are wrong, not only wrong that I won't buy their products but that as a computer person I will strongly recommend that no company I work for get them or any person that I know.

    So they pull this stunt, for what, a few extra dollars for some marketing sleazebags? This won't stop everyone from buying their computers but by this point I doubt that few /. users will be buying their products. Even this tiny fraction of their customer base must be worth more than whatever tiny gains they made.

    This is a classic example of spreadsheet thinking combined with a stovepiped company structure. The people who implemented this probably made their tiny corner of Lenovo look good on a spreadsheet while not really caring about the big picture because that wasn't their job in their little stovepipe. Even now as the company takes a hit they are probably fighting any attempts to cut them off from this information and potentially this tiny revenue stream.

    1. Re:Not personally Identifiable; Bullshit it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lenovo has been in my shit list since the pass recent 6 months or so, since the superfish news broke.

      My influence, both at work, and in personal life (with friends, relations, etc), has already cost them about 6 laptops worth of sales. May be small amount only, but if enough people end up doing this, it will add up.

      So, do your part, make sure Lenovo understands it the only way they will. Hit them in their wallets.

    2. Re:Not personally Identifiable; Bullshit it isn't by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      This. Anytime someone is claiming that information collection is OK because it's "not PII" and/or it's "anonymized", they are either lying or deeply misunderstanding the problem.

    3. Re:Not personally Identifiable; Bullshit it isn't by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      It is probably a mixture of both, plus some. The guy asking for the data believes this, the guy collecting the data doesn't, and the guy approving it is smart enough to think it through if he could be bothered.

  12. Don't Forget Pokki by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

    Their PC line also tends to have Pokki Installed, which screws with windows 10 installs and loves to drop adware every time it updates.

    1. Re:Don't Forget Pokki by NIK282000 · · Score: 1

      Dear sweet merciful crap. Someone bought an acer for work that had "Pokki" on it, everyone else thought it looked like a perfectly legit bit of software to have on a new computer...

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  13. Removal instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take the "last measure" against the spyware using this Removal tool

  14. Still? by CBob · · Score: 1

    They've been doing this for years. At some point after IBM sold off the brand, some DoD folks (and others) reported the PC's were now calling home to the other side of the Pacific.

    1. Re:Still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      207.net is Google though

    2. Re:Still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      207.net is not 2o7.net though, you see mon?

  15. Outgoing White Listed Firewall by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I don't have a Lenovo, this sort of thing is why I have set a firewall on my MacBook to block all outgoing requests unless they are whitelisted by me. It was a real eye opener when I first saw the number of applications that were phoning home without me knowing.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Outgoing White Listed Firewall by FrozenGeek · · Score: 1

      That should work well enough to block third-party apps from phoning home. If the manufacturer wants the device to phone home, a firewall on the device probably won't be effective. To be effective, you need the firewall to run on a separate device (ideally manufactured by someone other than the manufacturers of your computer and OS).

      --
      linquendum tondere
    2. Re:Outgoing White Listed Firewall by antdude · · Score: 1

      I do this in Windows with Norton, Outpost Firewall 2009, etc., but now I use Mac, iOS, Android, and Linux. What are the good easy firewalls to use for them? Basically, their alerts should appear when connections are made to ask me what to do.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:Outgoing White Listed Firewall by ki85squared · · Score: 1

      When I had a Mac, I used Little Snitch, which does exactly what you're describing. https://www.obdev.at/products/...

    4. Re:Outgoing White Listed Firewall by chihowa · · Score: 1

      You're completely correct, but testing with Little Snitch shows that Apple is fairly well behaved in this regard. At least for now.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    5. Re:Outgoing White Listed Firewall by chihowa · · Score: 1

      As mentioned, Little Snitch works well on a Mac. The last time I used iOS, I used Firewall iP. It required a jailbroken phone and I don't know if it's still maintained.

      I've never found an interactive egress firewall for Linux or Android, which always surprised me.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    6. Re:Outgoing White Listed Firewall by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Be careful about trusting firewall software that runs on the machine you use for other purposes. Operating systems and specially designed applications can and do route around those firewalls.

      What you need is a standalone firewall that protects your entire LAN. Preferably not one of the premanufactured "appliance" firewalls. With an obsolete computer and a moderate amount of knowledge, you can put together your own standalone firewall that is much more trustworthy.

    7. Re:Outgoing White Listed Firewall by antdude · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I wonder if there are any free ones.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    8. Re:Outgoing White Listed Firewall by antdude · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Darn for iOS software (old and requires jailbreaking) and not free for Little Snitch.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re: Outgoing White Listed Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Create your own. It's not hard really if you have some nix experience. Download openbsd. Enable PF. Read the walk thru and write your firewall rules. They have plenty of guides out there to get you started.

      I have my openbsd firewall sitting on a 2008 HP desktop with 1gig ram. I turned the machine into a fully functional firewall, DNS server, DHCP server, and ntp server.

    10. Re: Outgoing White Listed Firewall by chihowa · · Score: 1

      A dedicated hardware firewall gets a little awkward when you're traveling with a phone or laptop. Sometimes, you just have to settle for a software firewall on your device.

      Writing an interactive egress firewall for Linux shouldn't be hard and I may get around to doing that someday. But on Linux the OS and most apps are pretty well behaved, so there's not an urgent need to keep an eye on their every connection attempt.

      Android is another story, with both the OS and the apps constantly phoning home and making connection attempts. I have no idea how to even begin to shoehorn an egress firewall into Android, so the best that I can do now is block per-app with AFWall+.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  16. Bye bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to buy from Lenovo because their budget notebooks have good Linux compatibility. They come with a crap version of Ubuntu pre-installed, and I can simply wipe them with my distro, and everything works by default.

    Not any more. Even if I don't buy the crap pre-loaded with Windows 7/8, this kind of aggression against other customers is beyond toleration.

  17. Aw crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, look, that 250 gigabytes of Brazilian tranny porn was downloaded by my roommate. Yeah, that's it.

  18. Perhaps not that unique... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    fresh copies of Windows 7 Professional

    Fresh copies of the lenovo preload... And refurb may mean they were sloppy about OOBE and not presented the client with the ULAs

    Either way, this is not particularly unique to Lenovo. MS also has an identical 'customer feedback' telemetry (also not good). While it's good to complain, there's an added suggestion that Lenovo is uniquely being bad and coming up with conspiracy stories about how it's Chinese spying or some such complaint.

    I want to see *all* the vendors put under this scrutiny (Dell, HP, Apple, MS). We already know MS runs afoul of the same BS, what do we think the chances are for the other vendors?

  19. 207 is Adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2o7.net is Adobes spy-ware product "omniture", this domain is a shit attempt to fool IDS by labelling requests 192.168.1.2o7.net, so amusingly this Chinese latop went and saw the Americans for their spying needs and good ol adobe stepped up.
    Americans love spying, look at their tech industry, its based on it.

  20. Not on my laptop! by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lenovo Collects Usage Data On ThinkPad, ThinkCentre and ThinkStation PCs

    See, this kind of crap is why I always wipe new laptops and install a fresh copy of Windows 10.

    What?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Not on my laptop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should stop buying shitty laptops?

    2. Re:Not on my laptop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. You can trust Windows 10 to not do anything funny with your personal information!

    3. Re:Not on my laptop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh much?

  21. What'a next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will I be reading about next? Lenovo collecting user data on Hawlett-Packard Pavilions and Envybooks, Asus Zenbooks or maybe Acer Aspires?
    Also, does Lenovo have any mobile phones? Were those tested for anything yet?

  22. Peoples (I)Republic(A)ofChina(Y) by slick7 · · Score: 1

    I think I'm glad I didn't buy a Chinese version of an IBM idea. I have a Toshiba, ha ha ha, what irony.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    1. Re:Peoples (I)Republic(A)ofChina(Y) by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      You can take the laptop out of China, but you can't take the Chinese out of the laptop.

    2. Re:Peoples (I)Republic(A)ofChina(Y) by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can take the laptop out of China, but you can't take the Chinese out of the laptop.

      The main problem with Chinese laptops is that an hour later you want to buy another one.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:Peoples (I)Republic(A)ofChina(Y) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why blame them when it is the Republicans that forced them to do this. Forced them to.

  23. 2o7.net is Omniture/Adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    2o7.net is Omniture/Adobe

    http://www.adobe.com/investor-relations/omniture-acquisition.html

  24. Few posts back people recommended Lenovo for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People seem to have zero memory from one moment to the next. Despite the awful things that Lenovo does (like digital locks on there wifi cards so they can make a profit off repairs/parts at a later date) and spyware riddled PCs- even going to the extent installing a rootkit via the BIOS people continue reccomending/buying them. It's not just non-technical users either.

    And HP, Sony, Apple, Toshiba, and Dell are also guilty of many of these malicious deeds as well. Even companies like System76 aren't innocent. They're pushing proprietary crapware on users knowing full well it came be properly supported or supported going forward.

    I can name all of *TWO* companies I'd trust to deliver. One is Mini Free and the other is ThinkPenguin. The rest are pretty much run by naive persons or con-artist jack asses taking advantages of innocent people who don't know better. There is something to be said when a company refuses to ship stuff with malicious features despite there being demand when they *know* it'd put more money in there pocket. That's Mini Free and ThinkPenguin. Both have shown that they're concerned about privacy, security, and giving people systems that aren't going to have support discontinued a year after the systems/hardware has shipped.

  25. Surprised? by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    You all probably carry a cell phone which tracks everything you do, where you are what you click and what apps you run. Additionally those apps from various vendors do everything they can to obtain more information about you and your habits. Users of Windows software for years have had "send anonymous data to Microsoft to improve our products." While the intent may be noble, it's veiled at creating information about you, marketable information that they can sell or use for competitive advantage. There's no difference here. Of course you can re-image the system and move on without the Lenovo tracking but if you're on Windows, there's tracking going on. Linux and others not so much.

    So don't be surprised if any consumer product, even your thermostat tracks you.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:Surprised? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      You all probably carry a cell phone which tracks everything you do, where you are what you click and what apps you run.

      Many of us are running cyanogen or similar where the user has control over all that stuff.

      Users of Windows software for years have had "send anonymous data to Microsoft to improve our products."

      If you have a snapshot VM Windows image saved, you can roll back after every use and the OS doesn't remember what it did.

      marketable information that they can sell or use for competitive advantage.

      Humans are inevitably surprised when they discover that humans behave like humans.

    2. Re:Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cyanogen collects statistics as well, until you find the option and turn it off. Everybody collects your data.

    3. Re:Surprised? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      until you find the option and turn it off.

      Gosh, can you recommend a university where I can learn how to find this? My wife is not a computer expert, and she found that option on her own a couple of hours after the UPS delivery.

      Everybody collects your data.

      you just pointed out that cyanogen doesn't do it if you can find the option.

    4. Re:Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With attitudes like yours it is no wonder that everybody feels they have a right to spy on you until you tell them individually to stop.

    5. Re:Surprised? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      ONCE AGAIN WORLD DOMINATION IS MINE. Yes indeed, all bow to the one who can convince massive corporations to fall on their own swords.

    6. Re:Surprised? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      You all probably carry a cell phone which tracks everything you do, where you are what you click and what apps you run

      Mine doesn't. Or, at least, it doesn't let anything phone home with that information.

  26. Mozilla does it, Microsoft does it, why not Lenovo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called telemetry. The days when phoning home and privacy violations were associated with malware are over. Now everybody does it. For the user experience, we're told.

  27. The power of a boycott by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Well known to modify company behavior, but difficult to implement.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  28. Why is this insightful and not funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some things in the body

  29. Re:collecting is for cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they call you sexconker because your balls shattered when you were a wee lad?

  30. Abandon all hope. by devslash0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The worst part is that they like to switch back to their 'preferred settings' once in a while, ex. during updates, without you knowing. You may think that once you follow that clever removal guide you are done. You are not. It requires constant vigilance. The first law of IT Security: "If someone can run his program on your computer, it's not your computer anymore." Will we live to see the day when we are back in control of our data and devices?

  31. missing 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, I assume for their customers on Windows 10 they have to buy the usage data from Microsoft.

  32. Yea another wonderful China success story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When IBM ran things it was a better computer and had far more professionalism built into the computers. These days I would not give a Lenovo a second look when buying a PC. In fact these days I tend to buy a notebook wipe the drive, buy Windows if that's what I am installing and skip all the crapware. Install drivers and that's it. Totally, you have a way better performing PC and far less problems. Actually some of the "value added tools" could be useful if they were actually developed with productivity in mind and not collecting data or poorly updated or crashed a system. Does anyone at these companies actually use their own out of the box device?
    Probably not so they don't experience what we experience when starting up a new Lenovo. Let's not also forget the crapware compounds if you buy from a Best Buy because they add their own flavor of junk to the system. Best place for a PC buy is Microsoft store with its Signature (no bloatware) systems. Much improved over a retail purchased.

  33. Re:Few posts back people recommended Lenovo for Li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, our memory works. Name a line of laptops that has better quality than Thinkpads and has a company backing it that can supply a large organization. Apple doesn't count, they're far too expensive and harder to control in a corporate world.

    Lenovo has the best in a sea of bad options. They are few good companies anymore, only some of the little ones, but they're too little.

  34. Blue Meanies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank the selfless and thoughtful marketeers who saturate the media with this information to help me select the proper laptop. Is a Skylake Xmas on the horizon? Of course now I have to buy 3 delicate flower laptops to replace the one Thinkpad.

  35. Re:Mozilla does it, Microsoft does it, why not Len by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    The days when phoning home and privacy violations were associated with malware are over.

    No, they're not. I consider all applications that so this in a way that I can't disable to be spyware. It doesn't matter what the overt purpose of the software or who made it is.

    Applications that phone home by default but let me tell them not to aren't quite spyware, but are certainly malware.

  36. We need to be our own Man in the Middle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We ( consumers ) need our own device to plug in-line into our ethernet ports ( and perhaps include wifi which could also work around those bloody Broadcom chips ), to snoop on who our computers are communicating with. Given that manufacturer's malware could be in the BIOS itself, we can't even trust TCPDUMP+WIRESHARK to see all the packets. Maybe one of the higher end Raspberry PI-like devices with two gigabit ports and wi-fi would serve.

  37. Looked into it: it's mostly harmless by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

    What this customer feedback tool actually does is update entries from the "event log" called "Lenovo-Customer Feedback".
    If you open the Event Viewer you will see entries with a large hexadecimal string. This string is simply the text representation of the bytes of a gzip compressed xml file.

    The contents of this XML file looks like this:
    <root>
    <events>event1</events>
    <eVar20>Open</eVar20>
    <visitorID>aca1232d265941f7ae2259e402ab350c</visitorID>
    <eVar1>aca1232d265941f7ae2259e402ab350c</eVar1>
    <eVar2>N</eVar2>
    <eVar3>System Update</eVar3>
    <eVar4>2015-09-23</eVar4>
    <eVar5>5.7.0.6</eVar5>
    <eVar8>20AL00FGMH</eVar8>
    <eVar9>Think</eVar9>
    <eVar10>ThinkPad</eVar10>
    <eVar11>X240</eVar11>
    <eVar12>Windows 7 Professional</eVar12>
    <eVar13>US</eVar13>
    <eVar14>en</eVar14>
    <pageName>System Update</pageName>
    <timestamp>09-23-2015 19:54:13 PM</timestamp>
    <reportSuiteID>lenovoappssystemupdateprod</reportSuiteID>
    <serverUrl>http://lenovoappssystemupdateprod.112.2o7.net/b/ss/lenovoappssystemupdateprod/6</serverUrl>
    <assemblyName>Lenovo.TVT.CustomerFeedback.InnovApps</assemblyName>
    </root>

    The value aca1232d265941f7ae2259e402ab350c is a unique ID created for the Lenovo application for the user running it. This key is stored in the registry at:
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Lenovo\MetricCollectionSDK\UserAppIDs
    Removing it will give you a new key when events are logged.

    The server URL is the server where this data will be posted to. The kind of things logged appear events for the various Lenovo tools, like starting and which Lenevo system update you installed. (Along with data about your hardware/OS).

    Logging of events is also controlled via the the registry at:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Lenovo\MetricCollectionSDK\ReportSuites
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Lenovo\MetricCollectionSDK\ReportSuites
    You can change the "ReportMetrics" setting for each entry to disable it, but I do not know for how long as this data might be overwritten when a new MetricCollectionSubscription.xml file is downloaded from the Lenovo servers (this is stored in C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Local\Lenovo\MetricCollectionSDK )

    There is also a unique machine id stored at:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Lenovo\Customer Feedback
    This one is generated when it does not exist, and is included in "Lenovo-Customer Feedback" event entries for OmnitureSiteCatalyst. I do not know when these event entries are created .
    These entries contain XML data like this:
    <root>
    <visitorID>10e7794c7d254b4784e77df5c37963e7</visitorID>
    <eVar12>224d213ffaa14c5aa0d638b2e3a19c72</eVar12>
    <reportSuiteID>lenovotvtlenovosolutionscenterprod</reportSuiteID>
    <serverUrl>https://s.lenovo.com/b/ss/lenovotvtlenovosolutionscenterprod/6</serverUrl>
    <sc_xml_ver>1.0</sc_xml_ver>
    <pageName>lsc</pageName>
    <timestamp>2015-09-12T21:35:09.2631913+02:00</timestamp>
    <events>event11</events>
    <eVar1>20AL00FGMH</eVar1>
    <eVar2>2.8.005</eVar2>
    <assemblyName>Lenovo.TVT.CustomerFeedback.OmnitureSiteCatalyst</assemblyName>
    </root>

    So the collected data looks mostly harmless and somewhat anonymous, as fa