Slashdot Mirror


OPM Says 5.6 million Fingerprints Stolen In Cyberattack

mschaffer writes: The Office of Personnel Management data breach that happened this summer just got a little worse. The OPM now says that 5.6 million people's fingerprints were stolen as part of the hacks. The Washington Post reports: "That's more than five times the 1.1 million government officials estimated when the cyberattacks were initially disclosed over the summer. However, OPM said Wednesday the total number of those believed to be caught up in the breaches, which included the theft of the Social Security numbers and addresses of more than 21 million former and current government employees, remains the same."

21 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Credentials by Isarian · · Score: 4, Informative

    And this is why fingerprints are NOT good credentials.

    1. Re:Credentials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not really, all credentials can be stolen or copied. Fingerprints are just very difficult to change once they have been compromised. That's why that are bad credentials.

    2. Re:Credentials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The OPM is emailing the people affected, advising them to change their fingerprints.

      The advice comes with guidelines for proper fingerprint security, such as having a fingerprints at least ten digits long, with at least one loop, one whorl, one arch, and one "special character". Also, it's recommended to never re-use your fingerprints for multiple sites, and to change your fingerprints at least once every 90 days, being sure to never re-use any of your last ten fingerprints."

    3. Re:Credentials by avandesande · · Score: 2

      it's only a matter of time before someone figures out how to print fake finger prints as some sort of stamp, or at the very least transfer them to gummy bears.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  2. If you are going to steal... at least mess up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    In stealing the real finger prints. Should have randomly wlked the databases and reassign all finger-prints (even better individual fingers) to other persons, also other info (partial phone numbers, name, dates, what not) . So database would be worthless - trancate the SQL database logs a few times to be sure. :)

    See if the backup actually works or not. :)

    If you do not restore your database, how do you know it works??

  3. Fingerprints should.... by mark-t · · Score: 2

    .... only tell you who you can reasonably expect someone to be, but should not be relied on to tell you who somebody actually is.

    Relying on any so-called completely unique feature of every human being that may be currently impossible or at least extraordinarily difficult to replicate makes the implicit assumption that no technology could potentially invented that will make forging it possible or viable.

    1. Re:Fingerprints should.... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Fingerprints are pretty trivial to forge. Back in elementary school, we used to slack off by covering our fingertip, palm, etc. with Elmer's glue, letting it dry, and then peeling it off. Formed a surprisingly detailed 'negative' of the skin that it dried on. Since the glue was water based, you could then apply a layer of rubber cement to the 'negative' and get a sticky rubber 'positive' that you could wash the glue off.

      Obviously, the point of the exercise was not to evade biometrics, it was just something more interesting than what we should be doing, doable with the supplies available; but making relatively precise molds and then fabricating thin patterned membranes that can be applied to mask an individual's real fingerprints isn't rocket surgery.

      They still have some forensic value because of how many crimes are unplanned or poorly planned, and how careful you have to be to avoid slipping up; and because if you are being fingerprinted in custody your fake prints are going to have to withstand greater scrutiny; but for a biometric login, which usually happens under limited physical security and only tests against the sample you provide, not the hundreds you leave on every surface throughout the day, they are getting pretty tepid.

      DNA is more challenging to fake, especially if they want enough to plausibly plant into what looks like a real biopsy or fluid sample; but has the same "faking is the easy part; not shedding some of the real thing is the hard part" limitations. Even if you sidestep the difficulty of synthesizing by assuming that the person being impersonated is your accomplice, best of luck to you not shedding some of your own DNA.

  4. SOMETHING MUST BE DONE! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I demand that we vigorously close the barn door by implementing a robust biometric authentication infrastructure to prevent this from happening again!

    1. Re:SOMETHING MUST BE DONE! by bobdehnhardt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Be sure to include DNA from the horses that have already left...

  5. Everyone, it was everyone by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This same song-and-dance seems to play out with every big hack now:

    Week one:
    "It was just a few people who had some data limited compromised"

    Week two:
    It was just a few people who had most of their data compromised, but not their passwords

    Week three:
    "It was a lot of people, who had most of their data compromised, but not their passwords"

    Week four:
    "They got everything on everyone"

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  6. NOT Stolen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This can't be stealing - the originals are still there !

    It's just that they made a copy of the data.

    --- RIAA

  7. Re:No problem by k6mfw · · Score: 2

    Just change the fingerprints on all accounts and you're safe again.

    That is a totally ridiculous solution and yet it seems so reasonable (I'm sure someone will say, "it is the only way to be sure.")

    With impending guvmint shutdown sometimes I wonder who's minding the store? There's gotta be a "In Soviet Russia" answer to this one.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  8. That's just great... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Chinese have my background investigative report and my fingerprints for my government job. Next they will be shutting down the government for no reason.

  9. SF-86 forms by OffTheLip · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Very detailed histories of a persons family, including SSN's, were part of the heist via Form SF-86. Being a longtime defense department contractor whose security clearance details were likely compromised I am pissed. The forms included personal info from friends gracious enough to vouch for my veracity as a trusted agent for the US government. We were expected to protect paper and electronic copies of this form as we would other sensitive data. The joke appears to be on us.

  10. Infamous last words by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can have my fingerprints when you pry them from my cold, dead.....oh.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  11. No problem by Ashenkase · · Score: 2

    Just reset your fingerprint, this time please use numbers, letters and other symbols.

  12. Maybe I'm nuts.. by TrimTabTim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ....but over the last years, I've started to really cheer in glee every time there's a horrible breach of sensitive data.

    Only after a percentage of people are thoroughly harmed and screwed by the escape of sensitive information, will the world realize that there simply is no sound way to keep secrets safe. It is a logical fallacy for one to think they can make a system that is perfectly secure as every measure has a countermeasure

    Therefore, the only option that will remain after a sufficient number of people get fleeced, fucked and flogged will be to never collect it in the first place. To collect it, is to invite evil-doers to an all you can eat buffet.

    So celebrate the evil blackhats of the world!! Huzzah! For us to see progress, they must steal their billions, destroy lives, maim murder and pillage! Sure, we technology buffs understand risks and speak loudly about the NSAs, Facebooks and all the other "user abusers" of the world. But we clever geeks can never convince the masses to change their ways because our message is inconvenient.

    No sir. Until enough good people are fucked, the assholes of the world will keep winning the minds of innocent fools with lies like "If you've done nothing wrong you should have nothing to hide". How about this one, "We collect your information in order to better serve you". Orwell is spinning in his grave.

    Ending my rant: Good people need encryption and privacy the most, but they won't realize this until they've been burned by fire. So burn baby burn.

  13. How to fake fingerprints by __roo · · Score: 2

    How to fake fingerprints, in case you want to know what to do with them.

  14. OPM Says 5.6 million Fingerprints Stolen... So? by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 2

    So what? It's not the person, it's data ABOUT the person -- in other words, metadata.

    And everyone knows that metadata isn't real data; that's why the government is busy collecting so much of it.

    ------

    (Yes, I realize metadata would be where you actually found those fingerprints. But look-- soon you'll be able to find them everywhere!)

    ((And besides, I thought "privacy was dead, get over it."))

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  15. Re:I'm anonymous! And so is my wife! by fisted · · Score: 2

    A lot of climbing provides a reasonable workaround

  16. If you must, then it should be vein scan by markdavis · · Score: 2

    >"OPM Says 5.6 million Fingerprints Stolen In Cyberattack"

    Which is why fingerprints and DNA should *NEVER* be given, taken, or stored as biometrics.

    Deep vein scan. THAT is the only reasonable biometric. It is of almost no value if stolen, can't be misused easily, isn't left all over the place like fingerprints and DNA, is quite unique, contains no sensitive information about the person, is very difficult to fake, can't be easily collected or read without the user's knowledge, is fast and easy to collect and also to use.