Slashdot Mirror
Intel Launches SSD DC P3608 NVMe Solid State Drive With 5GB/Sec Performance
MojoKid writes: Intel just launched a new NVMe-based solid state drive today dubbed the SSD DC P3608. As the DC in the product name suggests, this drive is designed for the data center and enterprise markets, where large capacities, maximum uptime, and top-end performance are paramount. The Intel SSD DC P3608 is somewhat different than the recent consumer-targeted NVMe PCI Express SSD 750 series, however. This drive essentially packs a pair of NVMe-based SSDs onto a single card, built for high endurance and high performance. There are currently three drives slated for the Intel SSD DC P3608 series, a 1.6TB model, a 3.2TB model, and a monstrous 4TB model. All of the drives feature dual Intel NVMe controllers paired to Intel 20nm MLC HET (High Endurance Technology) NAND flash memory. The 1.6TB drive's specifications list max read 4K IOPS in the 850K range, with sequential reads and writes of 5GB/s and 3GB/s respectively. In the benchmarks, the new SSD DC P3608 offers up just that level of performance as well and is one of the fastest SSDs on the market to date.
Solid state cows don't sound like they'd taste good with A1, so I am 100% against this idea.
I have a feeling that you might not be in the target market for this particular item.
That was supposed to be consumer cheap and datacenter fast and durable?
I don't know what market this thing is for, maybe the host caching or db stuff.
Total Bytes Written(TBW), the finite total life of the flash drive, and price are the big factors with SSDs.
Two months old - Current wear leveling count 12 : Hmmm, I'm not sure that is enough.
From the specs: Rated for up to 3 DWPD (Drive Writes Per Day) over 5 years. So thats roughly 365x3x5 = 5400 total drive writes, you are currently at 12/60 = 1 drive write per 5 days, do the math assuming same size disk and this will last you 74 years...
People often comment that only a datacentre or intensive database operation needs this kind of speed, but virtualization another application where IOPS are important.
I recently put together a small ESXi server with a couple of Intel 750 Series PCIe SSD's for VM storage, rated at 460,000 random read, 290,000 random write (4k) IOPS. Even with multiple VM's running, the responsiveness is like nothing I've experienced before.
... on high capacity SSD's being over what you'd pay for an equivalent amount of storage on a hard drive is the single biggest issue with flash storage, in general.
There's a bit of an exponential curve where high capacity SSDs get much more expensive. Smaller SSDs are dirt cheap.
Until that issue is settled, SSD's can really only replace the floppy, IMO... but not the hard drive.
That battle is over. The SSD has ALREADY replaced the hard drive. We haven't bought a new computer with a spinning platter in our office in probably 3 years. We're a small business without huge data needs and our one server, built circa 2011, currently has a 4tb ZFS pool, and about 1/2 of that is snapshots and workstation backups (for which speed doesn't particularly matter). Next time I build a new server (another year or two I would guess), I'm expecting to put in only SSDs, because why not? A 1tb SATA SSD can be had for less than $400 today. I'll keep platters in the backup server.