Slashdot Mirror


Does It Make Sense To Hand Make Printed Circuit Boards?

An anonymous reader writes: A Hackaday author told the hackers that it isn't worth making your own PC boards anymore. Good tools, fast shipping, and cheap manufacturing capacity means that spending a day making a board that is much worse than a 'pro' board just isn't worthwhile anymore. The reaction was worse than when Kirk told the Star Trek fans to get a life. Although there have been some who agree, many of the readers have taken it as an affront to their very way of life.

196 comments

  1. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It doesn't take a day to make a PCB. Show me a place where I can order a PCB and have it in my hand within an hour.

    1. Re:Yes by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How often do you need it within an hour? If you're prototyping, then breadboards are usually fine. I'm a bit surprised that this is news: it was the advice almost ten years ago last time I did anything that required producing circuit boards. If you actually need a PCB, they're cheap to get professionally made and delivery is often next-day (or longer if you want to pay even less). Only make your own if speed is far more important than quality, and your time is cheap.

      Of course, that assumes that you're making a thing because you want thing. If you want to hand-print PCBs because you want to learn a craft as a hobby, then by all means, do so and have fun!

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Breadboarding works for hole-mounted stuff. I haven't done that in 10 years. I need a PCB within an hour so that I can build two or three prototypes within a day.

    3. Re:Yes by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      There are also those chain-link boards that you can build on if you need a quick simple prototype. That's an easy way if you just want one or two circuits for your personal use. Etching a board from scratch is often quirky since you discover that you need "yet another component" that you didn't plan for.

      If you have a good circuit that you have tested then you can use Eagle to cad it and order more boards if you need a small series of devices.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re: Yes by geoskd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Breadboarding works for hole-mounted stuff. I haven't done that in 10 years. I need a PCB within an hour so that I can build two or three prototypes within a day.

      Then you want these.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    5. Re:Yes by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

      I am usually only making one copy ever. Doing it on a perfboard (for hole mounted stuff) or etching my own PCB is much faster than ordering a PCB (and actually having the layout in a format that the company accepts) and waiting a few weeks for it to arrive.

    6. Re:Yes by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How often do you need it within an hour?

      Who is the target market? Think about who they were talking to and where it was posted. This is hack-a-day. A site for people who build things often because they need something now or put together items they have at home instead of buying something from the store.

      There's no doubt that a professional board house is a great thing, and I have no problem ordering something 3 weeks out for a project where I carefully build and select parts, but not all my projects were like that. Just the other day I made a board for someone who needed something the following week, except all the suitable components in my parts bin were surfacemount. I couldn't breadboard that, at least not in a way where it would last more than a few days.

      The problem was not the fact that the HaD author pointed out that PCBs can be manufactured at great cost and quality. It's the elitist way the article was written telling people off for daring to hack something together themselves. "I don't make my own PCBs anymore and neither should you."

      I just typed this on my Surface. I don't use a desktop or a mac and neither should you. What kind of result do you think that comment would get on Slashdot?

    7. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

      Not only that, PCBs prototypes are expensive even if you are willing to wait for a day or two.

      I have took the time to tweak and polish our process, so I can have prototype PCB etched in very short time while still achieving repeatable quality, comparable with commercial products. Having that option is golden so I can play with various options and immediately see what works and what doesn't and where lie unfoseen problems before I shell $$$ for end product. Often end result is good enough to skip that step completely. I can leave the board as it is, so it lives in actual application and then eventually after some time make additional tweaks that might be needed for v2 of the board that might be manufactured at some qty.

      I will even have metalisation, solder mask and white silk soon. Until then, at least metallisation improvisation is doable - it is easy to adapt simple up to two layer PCBs so that they can be done effectively by DIY method...

    8. Re:Yes by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Try to do touch-related stuff on a breadboard. I dare you. Even if you do the actual sensor on a PCB, the parasitic capacity on the various wires will drive you nuts, not to mention that you have to painstakingly ensure the key wires don't run to close to each other, to cross each other and $deity help you if you should dare to move the board an inch.

      Another thing you do not necessarily want to do on breadboard is some of the more timing critical SMD shit. No, breakouts are not always an option.

      Considering how cheap the various parts are by now and that you can actually (some equipment, skill and training permitting) go from design to ready-to-test board in about an hour or two, depending on how complicated your design actually is, this means that yes, there IS still a reason to do your own PCBs. I prefer to test on breadboard, too. But there are a few things you simply can't do on it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Yes by mvdwege · · Score: 0

      No, the problem is that some people can't read, and yet persist in proclaiming that their half-cocked understanding of an article they maybe half read is correct.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    10. Re: Yes by bjwest · · Score: 1

      If you're prototyping, why in hell not use "hole-mounted stuff"? In the time it takes you to solder on two or three surface mount components, you can have the whole circuit breadboarded up and smoke flying. You can then replace the component that the smoke escaped from and move a wire or two to keep that smoke in. No need to design a complete new board and wait for it to be etched or, worse, ordered and delivered, for each prototype. That's what breadboards are for, for Christ’s sake.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    11. Re:Yes by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " If you're prototyping, then breadboards are usually fine."

      Not in this day and age of surface-mount components, they are not.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re: Yes by Khyber · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "If you're prototyping, why in hell not use "hole-mounted stuff"?"

      Because the capacitors with the uF ratings I require are SUB MILLIMETER and SURFACE MOUNT *ONLY.*

      Because the ceramic high-wattage resistors I use are SURFACE MOUNT ONLY.

      Because the LEDs I use are SURFACE MOUNT ONLY.

      Because you can't hole-mount a BGA package without adding in another component and thus forcing you to redo all your damned math to take into account the added resistance of a connection adapter.

      Because most breadboard designs are garbage.

      Because breadboards aren't made of metal like MCPCBs and are thus useless for my high-heat design work.

      Because it's 2015.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    13. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has nothing to do with being politically correct, and everything to do with being a decent, accepting, and kind human being!

    14. Re:Yes by amalcolm · · Score: 2

      Who doesn't accept Gerber format?

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    15. Re:Yes by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      surface mount IC's

    16. Re: Yes by DrLang21 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you saying that you craft your own PCBs that can take a BGA package? You are either insane or a genius.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    17. Re: Yes by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If you're prototyping, why in hell not use "hole-mounted stuff"? In the time it takes you to solder on two or three surface mount components, you can have the whole circuit breadboarded up and smoke flying.

      You must be either the worst SM component worker or the best through hole worker in the world.

      I've been working with Surface mount for several years now, and while different, I haven't seen that wild ratio of work speed you claim.

      The main reason to shift to SMT is that there aren't all that many non SMT active components available any more.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re:Yes by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I am usually only making one copy ever. Doing it on a perfboard (for hole mounted stuff) or etching my own PCB is much faster than ordering a PCB (and actually having the layout in a format that the company accepts) and waiting a few weeks for it to arrive.

      I haven't found their one-off boards to be all that inexpensive either. And then there is rework.

      We're makin' stuff!

      And the answer to the submitter of the article is that yes, it makes no sense to hand make PC boards. Nor does it make sense to make things at all. Just be a good consumer and purchase things to keep the economy strong.

      Meanwhile, I'll make my own at home. I don't care if it makes sense to him.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or get a single board without needing to pay for ten or more.

    20. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, if you are using these SMT components, you need a SMT assembly line and oven to build you design. So unless you have the money you need someone to build it for you. I doubt you are manually building a custom assembly and using BGA and doing it all by hand.

      So custom hand made boards for use with non SMT components are a thing. Plus not everyone lives in your little first world. The world is larger than that and there is a demand for old school electronics still.

    21. Re:Yes by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      " This is hack-a-day. A site for people who build things often because they need something now or put together items they have at home instead of buying something from the store.

      Since you don't know the Hack-a-Day target audience at all, you should probably refrain from commenting about articles found there until you do some day. Today I'm hacking together an oscilloscope ... tomorrow I'm hacking together a Logic Analyzer! Just because you read about Rome in a day, doesn't mean it was built in one.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    22. Re: Yes by WillRobinson · · Score: 2

      No, you do not need automated assembly for smt, or even silk screen solder paste. We do it here daily by hand for space level stuff.
      Small air powered dispensers, and a oven is all you need.

    23. Re: Yes by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're prototyping, why in hell not use "hole-mounted stuff"?

      Many modern ICs are only available in SM packaging.

      In the time it takes you to solder on two or three surface mount components, you can have the whole circuit breadboarded up and smoke flying.

      No. Get some solder paste, and a reflow oven (a $29 toaster oven from Walmart works fine). Surface mount is much faster than through-hole because you you just place the parts on the board with tweezers and pop it in the oven.

    24. Re: Yes by necro81 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also these, from Adafruit. Depending on the size, they only cost about $1 apiece. That's expensive for production but, if your time is worth anything to you, is well worth it for prototyping.

    25. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exercise your 2nd amendment rights and eat a gun.

    26. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it has *everything* to do with being politically correct.

      Political Correctness is, in simple terms, the simple act of treating others with the same respect you demand for yourself.

    27. Re:Yes by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You realise that articles of interest posted, and the mindset of readers are not the same things right? Or I suppose everyone on Slashdot is a veteran C++ coder who hates Java?

      There are countless examples on HaD of where people have quickly built stuff out of need, want, or just plain lazyness and not wanting to leave the house. Just because Rome wasn't built in a day doesn't mean everyone is happy to sit around and wait a century.

      Actually thanks for posting those links, scrolling down you can see plenty of examples, i.e. someone needed a logic analyser. Did they go out to Seed studios and buy one for $30? Why not. It's cheap, capable and would be here in a few weeks. No one guy pulled a microcontroller out of his parts bin and made one right there and then. Thanks, you really schooled me on the type of people hackers are.

    28. Re: Yes by Khyber · · Score: 5, Interesting

      All you need is a good printer with high-DPI for mask printing, and a proper technique that involves pre-tinning the BGA pads on the PCB, then setting your BGA part on the board and heating up the board to reflow the solder. The component will align itself without shorts due to surface tension from the solder.

      I've done plenty of memory stick and GPU mounting/re-mounting work.

      I work with traces in the single-digit micron range working on repairing LCD screens.

      It's not that difficult.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    29. Re: Yes by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "As far as I know, if you are using these SMT components, you need a SMT assembly line and oven to build you design."

      No, you don't. Not even close. You can do just fine with a 600/1200w hot air gun from harbor freight and some flux-core solder from radioshack. Or you can build a wire pen for finer lead work.

      And not all surface-mount stuff requires hot air reflow techniques. I can hand-solder 2mm micro-capacitors using a soldering iron with a pencil-thickness tip.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    30. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or a liar

    31. Re: Yes by Khyber · · Score: 2

      Hell, I don't even use tweezers. Most SMT components are so lightweight that simply pressing on them with your finger so it stick to it then pressing them to the paste affixes them in place for oven work.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    32. Re: Yes by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah I started buying a whole series of those. When you look at the insane number of different footprints you would need to have quite the home hobby shop warehouse for all the adapters needed, not to mention the cost of those adapters are often higher than the cost of the part to begin with and don't even get me started about their sheer size.

      They are great for quick temporary prototyping, but not so good for a quick once-off build.

    33. Re: Yes by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, if you are using these SMT components, you need a SMT assembly line and oven to build you design. So unless you have the money you need someone to build it for you. I doubt you are manually building a custom assembly and using BGA and doing it all by hand.

      I do it using a small syringe to dispel solder paste and a toaster oven hacked with a temperature controller. For anything where a pin is showing you can do it with a soldering iron and no special equipment is required.

      So custom hand made boards for use with non SMT components are a thing. Plus not everyone lives in your little first world. The world is larger than that and there is a demand for old school electronics still.

      They are a thing of the past. Most third world shitholes these days will still produce things with surface mount designs for the simple reason that by choosing through-hole design you're are extremely limited in your product choice, and are often paying a premium.

    34. Re:Yes by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "You realise that articles of interest posted, and the mindset of readers are not the same things right? Or I suppose everyone on Slashdot is a veteran C++ coder who hates Java?"

      You make a great point. Readers flock to the site because their interests are in direct opposition to the articles posted there! The fact that you drew such a ridiculous inference about my positions on C++ and Java cuts to the core of your idiocy, in the same way that you wrongly inferred that Hack-a-day meant things you hack together in a day.

      "No one guy pulled a microcontroller out of his 'parts bin and made one right there and then."

      You should probably read what you use as a reference before using it to make (or in your case break) a point: "[Joonas] was able to capture PS/2 signals with his logic sniffer, so we’ll call this project a success. However, there were a few problems that made this project a little more trouble than it was worth: there is no easy way to turn a serial dump into a binary file, Putty didn’t allow suppressing output to the terminal, and Mac serial ports twinkling above 115.2 kbps don’t work natively." - [emphasis added] Those problems aren't solved in a day buddy.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    35. Re:Yes by shaitand · · Score: 1

      That would work if anything came in a form you can breadboard anymore.

    36. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if you are up to nefarious things, I am sure.

    37. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those only go so far. For low-speed stuff, sure.
      Big honking pins on an adapter complete undo one of the benefits of having short surface mount leads, i.e. lower parasitic inductance.
      Course if you were using a breadboard you'd know how unsuitable they are for certain things, which is why you'd need prototype pcbs in the first place.

    38. Re: Yes by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It works, I've done it, learned how on youtube. Even without BGA there are still easily to hand soldier chips.

      Finding ANYthing even remotely modern that will go in a bread board... forget it.

    39. Re: Yes by shaitand · · Score: 2

      You've been misinformed. You can use a toaster oven or a hot air rework station. It'll run about $200.

    40. Re: Yes by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there just isn't much there.

    41. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Only make your own if speed is far more important than quality, and your time is cheap.

      If the prototype works and gets the job done then quality is sufficient.
      If your time is sufficiently expensive, then having a PCB made in a couple hours in-house makes more sense than waiting a day or three or seven as a part of someone else's batch.

      Personally I haven't made my own PCB in over ten years, I don't have that many electronics projects that I need "today" and it's nasty work. :)

    42. Re:Yes by kheldan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Been working in electronics for >30 years.

      If all you need is a simple PCB (even 2-layer with plated-through holes is not that difficult) with no silkscreen or soldermask, and you're willing to have the chemicals and a PCB drill press with appropriate PCB drills on hand to do it, then it's very convenient. If you want silkscreen and soldermask, then it's going to be fairly time consuming and require quite a bit more equipment. If you need more than 2 layers, you're having a fab house do it for you, unless your need is so frequent and regularly urgent that you can justify the huge expense; at this point you are a fab house. Of course in this day and age, you can build almost anything you want and never have a single through-hole on a PCB (with the exception of vias); if it's a single-layer board then you don't even need vias in the first place and are just etching; if you're willing to put up with the relatively low-quality results, there's the toner-transfer method. As with most things it all should be dictated by need. Unfortunately governments would just as soon take everything that's not a common household chemical out of the hands of common citizens, so I'm not very surprised that there's someone trying to discourage people from manufacturing their own PCBs.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    43. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For christ sake you're doing it all wrong! If it's not handmade from scratch it aint up to snuff

    44. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a rapidly changing design? For example if you need to test reflections and how they are effecting your circuit, if you need to make a minor change do you want to have to wait 2 days (with fast shipping) if you find that you had a minor miscalculation or forgot something minor. I've heard about real world designs where a company printed a pin to low that needed to be set high. (because they missed a footnote in the datasheets) a simple test print of the schematic would have saved them a lot of headaches and money. Unless someone wants to develop a cheap yet "professional" method of getting a test print board rapidly then we are just going to have to use what is available to us. Though I will coincide that the technology has advanced to such a state that now it is good enough for anything after the prototype stage to be contracted out.

    45. Re:Yes by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I have looked at making pcb for projects, and mostly concluded that the time and cost to get started, chemicals or equipment etc wasn't really worth it. I think, in the end, it depends what your goals are.

      If all you make are one-offs, and want to iterate quickly, and do a lot of it, then maybe it makes sense for you. If you can't do prototypes on breaboard or other (I like breadboard layout PCBs myself) then maybe it makes sense.

      However, as someone who only has the occasional need, or who wants to prototype a couple, then order 20 of them. I was working on a home automation project, perfect example, because once my design is fully prototyped, I want to send off and have a bunch of them made, because I need at least 2-3 for each room of the house.

      I am not making those pcbs by hand, and I don't make pcbs by hand now, so, it really doesn't make sense for me to start.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    46. Re: Yes by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

      No. Get some solder paste, and a reflow oven (a $29 toaster oven from Walmart works fine). Surface mount is much faster than through-hole because you you just place the parts on the board with tweezers and pop it in the oven.

      Heck, I do all of my SMT soldering with my trusty Hakko iron, although I'll use a big ugly heat gun for removing IC's. With a reservoir tip on my iron, (and lots of resin paste), I can even solder fine-pitch quads. If I was producing a lot of stuff I'd go with an oven, but in low volumes I do fine with just an iron.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    47. Re: Yes by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, if you are using these SMT components, you need a SMT assembly line and oven to build you design.

      Syringe of solder paste and a toaster oven (we didn't even bother with the temperature controls, just leave it in until the last of the paste melts).

    48. Re:Yes by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Aren't these questions addressed by using an FPGA? Small or big projects are easily prototyped on mine, and verilog is such a simple language... and breadboards for whatever i/o and support circuits, voila! your working prototype is ready for whatever pcb it wants. And that gets printed or sent out. No waiting, no mess, no fuss.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    49. Re: Yes by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Mounting a BGA is one thing (probablly easier than mounting a QFN), fabbing a PCB to mount one on is quite another. It's not so much etching the pads for the chip (BGA ball pitches at least for FPGAs are often larger than QFP or QFN pitches), it's making the connections to get the inner pads of the BGA out. That means lots of really small vias and for all but the smallest chips more than two layers.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    50. Re:Yes by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      However, as someone who only has the occasional need, or who wants to prototype a couple, then order 20 of them. I was working on a home automation project, perfect example, because once my design is fully prototyped, I want to send off and have a bunch of them made, because I need at least 2-3 for each room of the house.

      I am not making those pcbs by hand, and I don't make pcbs by hand now, so, it really doesn't make sense for me to start.

      For certain, the more boards you need, the more sense it makes to have a board house do them. The cost per board plummets.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    51. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately governments would just as soon take everything that's not a common household chemical out of the hands of common citizens,

      And many things that are common household chemicals. For example, it's possible to make explosives from nail polish remover and disinfectant (although they'll need to be concentrated somewhat first), or with products available at a garden supply store, or poison gas from bleach and toilet bowl cleaner. Although these days a lot of common household chemicals have been reformulated to be "safer" or "more environmentally friendly" (and more expensive).

      And of course, the mantra of "educational" shows everywhere: "Don't try this at home." (Okay, there's some liability deniability there too.)

    52. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Or I suppose everyone on Slashdot is a veteran C++ coder who hates Java?

      Nope. I'm a *novice* C++ coder who hates Java!

    53. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Political Correctness is, in simple terms, the simple act of treating others with the same respect you demand for yourself.

      No, it is the simple act of making others conform to how you think people should be treated.

      Why do you get to tell ME what's "correct" and not the other way around?

    54. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As far as I know, if you are using these SMT components, you need a SMT assembly line and oven to build you design."

      No, you don't. Not even close. You can do just fine with a 600/1200w hot air gun from harbor freight and some flux-core solder from radioshack. Or you can build a wire pen for finer lead work.

      And not all surface-mount stuff requires hot air reflow techniques. I can hand-solder 2mm micro-capacitors using a soldering iron with a pencil-thickness tip.

      Except RadioShack no longer exists. :( So if you run out of solder I guess you head to the local hardware store and hope they have some, or you'll have to wait a day or two to order online.

    55. Re: Yes by Khyber · · Score: 1

      QFNs are even simpler than BGAs as you've got one MASSIVE central thermal pad to solder and a few pads around the edges to solder. Hot air soldering iron gets the job done in about 15 seconds.

      Making the connections is indeed the issue. Some BGAs are so dense that you need a minimum of 4 layers to get the reliable separation required for clean signals down-trace.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    56. Re: Yes by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Radioshack does indeed exist. Many stores just became combo RadioShack/Sprint stores. Sprint gets one half, RS gets the other. Stil got the big drawer full of components, with a rack of solder and irons right above it, as usual.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    57. Re: Yes by geoskd · · Score: 1

      Course if you were using a breadboard you'd know how unsuitable they are for certain things, which is why you'd need prototype pcbs in the first place.

      Anything that would cause issues when done on a breadboard is going to have just as many issues with a home-etched PCB.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    58. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not need silkscreen and you probably do not really need soldermask. If your home method does not suck then you probably do not need electrical testing too. A visual check is enough.

    59. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you aren't really making PCBs, you're making decorations.

    60. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are either insane or a genius.

      Or quite possibly both. :-)

    61. Re: Yes by samwichse · · Score: 1

      They closed both stores near me :(

  2. Yep by stooo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, most times it doesn't make sense any more to make PCBs in house.
    Two exceptions : very fast manufacturing is needed, or for hobby use.
    But even for hobby, it's better to wait 5-30 days and pay the few euros for the boards.

    --
    aaaaaaa
    1. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait 5-30 days

      Fuck that, glory to perfboard, death to SMD.
      A botched PCB is horrible while a perfboard can always be fixed, also upgrading a PCB several times like that would mean waiting months.

    2. Re:Yep by garry_g · · Score: 1

      There's enough manufacturers in Europe that offer a 1-2 day turnaround time ... of course that service costs more than if they can pool your order with others ...

    3. Re:Yep by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      wait 5-30 days

      You nailed that one right there. 5-30 days. It may get here sometime in the next month. You can't plan for this. Don't think of having your project ready on any given date. You may have just pulled those numbers out of your arse but this is exactly why I often still make my own boards, because none of the hobby paneling companies can offer consistent delivery dates. OSHPark has been better than most with narrowing it down, but for the longest time it has been "You'll get it when you get it" and that is often not good enough.

      For any larger project I buy my boards.
      For any smaller hacks where I have parts in my parts bin or can get it from the local electronics store I build my own.

    4. Re:Yep by stooo · · Score: 1

      >>You can't plan for this. Don't think of having your project ready on any given date. You may have just pulled those numbers out of your arse

      For hobby, I'll just wait, usually. If I need the boards faster, I use a pro service, with guaranteed delay. Eurocircuits for example is good, fast, and reasonably priced here in Europe.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    5. Re: Yep by amalcolm · · Score: 0

      Blockbuster = shitpile ... I'll wait for the next European independent film thans, of a Hollywood one conceived in the UK

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    6. Re:Yep by amalcolm · · Score: 2

      Try PCBWAY in china. Amazing price, quality & delivery

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    7. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either I am looking or the wrong thing, or I absolutely can't see how 27 EUR could be considered "reasonably priced" when all components together for a lot of the simple things cost 1 - 5 EUR!
      A PCB that makes up 80% to 96% of the overall price just isn't very useful except for really complex things where you have no choice.

    8. Re:Yep by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Then stop moving here and infecting us with your bs.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    9. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The europoors are getting angry. At least this will distract them from their immigration problem for a few minutes.

    10. Re: Yep by MightyYar · · Score: 0

      I agree. My farts smell much better when I watch independent films. But then, my farts smell much better than everyone else's inferior farts all the time.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:Yep by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Yes, most times it doesn't make sense any more to make PCBs in house. Two exceptions : very fast manufacturing is needed, or for hobby use. But even for hobby, it's better to wait 5-30 days and pay the few euros for the boards.

      So I'm just starting to get into doing some boards, and I'll certainly be doing the initial stages myself until I get the circuits/etc right - then, and only then, would I consider sending it off to someone else to be made.

      And yes, I've computer designed a few before; still getting the hang of it all so I don't trust the design will be quite right yet either. But as I said, I'm just getting into it. Someone that has more experience and trusts their computer designed boards probably wouldn't have that issue.

      (Thus far, I've designed several cables on my own, and a couple boards with some help.)

      All said, for hobbyists...it'd probably be 50/50 overall. If you have time but not budget, it may still be better to just do your own boards. A fab house really only helps if you have a sufficient budget to pay someone else to make the boards for you. If you don't, and time is not a big consideration, then making them slowly on your own will certainly be the right thing to do.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    12. Re:Yep by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You nailed that one right there. 5-30 days. It may get here sometime in the next month.

      I've used Express PCB for about ten years or so now. Free schematic software, free board layout software, and they ship the next day. I've had boards in two days. It's $51 for three boards in a size similar to a BeagleBone or Pi.

      I also have the chemicals etc to do homemade boards. I haven't used any of it for a very long time. It was fun to see the board you make etch, but it is more fun to show someone a project that looks professionally made.

      Yeah, you get a fixed size board for that price, but you can build prototypes on that and then order the specific size you need when you finalize the design. And yes, I have a few drawers with breakouts and proto boards in them for quick tests.

  3. He has got some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, he has got some points... i too hate making my own PCBs (i'm not a young enthusiast anymore).
    Most of what i make are only prototypes useful to me only and it is a huge waste of time to:
    1) create the layout via software (maybe i also need to create my own components before because i can't find a library with all the ICs/components that i need)
    2) go through all the lengthy steps to make a real PCB out of it
    3) get rid of the chemicals once done paying attention to not ruin anything (i ruined a whole wall one day when i was a teen at my first attempts...)

    There is a good, although a little bit forgot, alternative though... it is called "wire-wrapping".
    Yes, it is not as beautiful as a specialized PCB, but if you have the correct wires and tools it becomes quite a fast process.
    You don't need to use any software for the layout. Did you f*ck something up? No worries... just unwrap and fix the mistake! It is strong enough to be usable in real-world scenarios.

    Of course, if you need to make several copies of your board... then the PCB is the way to go. But if you only need one damn copy or you are just prototyping... then wire-wrapping makes a lot of sense.

    1. Re:He has got some points by stooo · · Score: 5, Informative

      a good modern alternative to wire wrap for SMD components :

      http://elm-chan.org/docs/wire/...

      Used that for some very fine pitch, nice results for one-offs.

      I recommend experimenting with different wire thickness and insulations (some enameling is made to be burned off when soldering, and there's an optimal diameter around 0,3mm)

      --
      aaaaaaa
    2. Re:He has got some points by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I have resorted to prototyping boards for one-off builds. In the event I need something more then it's some CAD work in Eagle and order a set of boards.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    3. Re:He has got some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, very interesting.

    4. Re:He has got some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wire wrapping only works for lower frequency signaling due to the capacitance of the connection (not to mention the variability). The higher frequency signaling used by modern CPUs requires wave soldering.

      If necessary, you can run a one off, hand made PCB through wave soldering pretty quick.

      Wire wrapping (for best quality) also requires special sockets with longer pins (with a square cross-section). This means that your prototype will be a lot thicker than a that made from a PCB.

      If your prototype needs to be nearly the same physical height as production, then PCB is it. Of course the surface area will still be a lot bigger than production, but that will be true of wire wrapping as well.

      .

    5. Re:He has got some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) get rid of the chemicals once done paying attention to not ruin anything (i ruined a whole wall one day when i was a teen at my first attempts...)

      Anyone that knows what they are doing uses cupric chloride. There are no chemicals to clean up if you use this as the bath is self sustaining and will last essentially forever.

    6. Re:He has got some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats a nice technique.

      what people fail to mention often enough in this thread is the inherent cost of bringing
      up a windows machine, re-learning how to use that god awful software,
      finding and/or constructing all the pad layouts, checking your work 3 times
      to make sure you dont have the parts upside down, etc etc

      then you get to wait for your boards and stuff them.

      a great process for quantity 10 of a mostly settled design. pretty crappy for just playing around

      i just need 100 wires to knock something out. its easier and far more pleasant to sit down with some 26ga
      wire and a soldering iron.

      so this looks perfect, since using through hole parts pretty much limits you to parts available
      10, 15, 20 years ago, or dealing with adapter boards.

      so, unforunately the article was a little impenetrable -

            i understand about the ptfe, totally agree. but i've never used a wire pen. does it have a strip and cut function
            in the tip?

            related - i've worked alot with enamel wire for inductors, but termination is the hard part...so stripping and tinning
                all those short runs and having such a pretty layout seems nearly impossible..there has to be a trick that i was
                unable to extract from thepost

          are there issues with the fact that the packages are only tacked down in a couple places? do you try to
          hit 4 spots to give it some stability? i can imagine making a wrong move and seriously screwing things
          up

          it would be easier if the leads weren't on the pcb/kapton..i almost want to flip the parts upside down and
          epoxy them to a non-conductive board...except the the leads would get screwed up

      anyways, thanks for posting that, its a cool process to think about

            is there a youtube video?

  4. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would it be like...

    Handwriting a letter?
    or...
    Sending that letter through the post? ;)

  5. Hm? But most comments AGREE with the article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The reaction was worse than when Kirk told the Star Trek fans to get a life." Really? From what I can tell, it's only a small minority of the commenters who were outraged.

    The rest of them seem to agree, and post their experiences with using various custom PCB services, software, etc.

    1. Re:Hm? But most comments AGREE with the article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One angry comment on Twitter is clearly COMMUNITY OUTRAGE these days.
      Don't you watch CNN?

    2. Re:Hm? But most comments AGREE with the article! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just like with ST-Fans, where the majority didn't give a shit about Shatner's comment and a few basement dwellers caused a stink.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Totally not worth the trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nope, not worth it by a long shot.

    It's fun to try If you want to understand the PCB etch process, or if you absolutely need a PCB right away.
    But the results are quite frankly terrible compared to paying $10 for 5 boards from china.

    The main issues with home made PCBs is
    - Drilling the holes dead center
    - No plated through holes.
    - 2 layers can be a bitch to align
    - No solder mask.
    - Side etching of the thin tracks.
    - The many many hours of time it takes verses just paying the $10 and waiting 2 weeks.

    1. Re:Totally not worth the trouble by jabuzz · · Score: 2

      Add to this the cost of the equipment to make the dam thing. You will need light boxes, developer, and etching tanks, and that does not include the cost of the chemicals. Also add in the cost of the drill and bits. You result will also not be tin plated either unless you spend even more. The end result is while it might be more expensive to get one made, you don't have the cost of capital deployed required to make one. So you are going to have to do lots of PCB's to make it viable anyway.

      I have made PCB's in the past, but today even though I have all the kit I would just order one up. Maybe it is because I have more disposable income than in the past, but the difference between a DIY board and a properly made one makes getting a professionally made one a no brainer in my view. The other thing is that once you go down that route you open up your options. Want a three layer board with a ground plane for example, no problem, try that DIY.

      All that said I have a notion that a laser cutting/engraving machine could be used to make single sided PCB's to a high standard in a one stop process. Basically etch the copper away and "drill" the holes with the laser. You could probably do something similar with one of those cheap milling machine things as well.

    2. Re:Totally not worth the trouble by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't make my own PCBs. I do surface mount stuff and I like going for small sized. Lots of tiny vias, tiny component pitches, double sided, and of course a solder mask.

      I know people who do make PCBs and they of course use it for big fat coarse things. You can do coarse pitch surface mount without a solder mask. That removes the need for holes, too and if you're size is large you can get away with single sided + a few jumpers too.

      - Drilling the holes dead center

      Etch a dot out of the middle of the pad. The drills self-align.

      - No plated through holes.

      Use rivets, or chemical plating:
      http://www.instructables.com/i...
      or electroplating:
      http://www.thinktink.com/stack...

      - No solder mask.

      There's spray, but apparently film is easier to use:

      http://www.instructables.com/i...

      Here's what a home made PCB can look like if you take it to the max:

      http://kavionic.com/blog/Makin...

      So it's actually amazing what you can do at home, and the top-end PCB home brewers can actually produce some pretty professional PCBs. No way I'm investing the time and money into that proess though.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Totally not worth the trouble by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      While I agree with your conclusion, for the most part, I disagree about the cost of DIY equipment. If you are complaining about the cost of PCB-making equipment, you haven't discovered toner transfer yet. If you have access to a laser printer and a decent drill press, the only special equipment you need is a clothes iron from Walmart, or a garage sale. Either way, under $10.

      You'll want to google it, of course, but the short version is that your print your design mirrored on clay-coated photo paper, then press it to your board, use the iron to melt it to the copper, then use hot water to remove the paper. Now you have durable etchant resist on your board and can etch as usual. Personally, I never use tanks, I just dip paper towels in etchant and gently wipe the board until the uncoated copper is gone.

      For the second layer, you drill at least a few holes first and use pins through them to align the second paper. You can use the same method to make 3 and 4 layer boards, just by stacking a single sided board on one or both sides of the center double sided board. No blind vias with this method, of course. If you have problems with connections to the middle layers, drill the outer layers somewhat oversized to leave exposed copper for the solder to find. (Actually, design with larger drill holes, and drill the center board undersized.)

      I don't have a laser, but CNC milling isn't as useful as you'd hope, at least not with cheap machines. Carbide endmills don't usually come in sizes small enough to run a trace between two pads, for example. You can use a hemiconical engraving tip with a sharp angle where the width of a shallow cut is very narrow, but then you need to make sure that your board is REALLY flat and your machine is REALLY square.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    4. Re:Totally not worth the trouble by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      It's fun to try If you want to understand the PCB etch process, or if you absolutely need a PCB right away.
      But the results are quite frankly terrible compared to paying $10 for 5 boards from china.

      Another thing that's in play here, is I think there's been a shift in (for lack of a better term) "project management" by hobbyists. When I was younger, it seemed most hobbyists (regardless of the hobby) had several projects on the bench at any given time... long term ones, short term ones, one where you were waiting on parts or that you really shouldn't tackle the next step until you'd gotten that new whatever or gotten around to cleaning and precisely adjusting that old whatever. But along with the decreasing attention spans of the general public, the hobbyist attention span has decreased as well - and there also seems to be increased serial monogamy and obsession with completing the One True Project. This shift means they can't wait two weeks for a board from China.

  7. For learning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... the best way for us to learn the basics is to learn by doing. Everyone forgets what its like to start from scratch. When we pontificate from our position of knowledge we often forget the struggle and cost of learning along the way and for us to deny future generations that is stupid.

    1. Re: For learning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You miss an important aspect: in this day and age, acquiring non-mainstream knowledge that is outside the market's requirements and outside the accepted channels is highly suspect. This is the post-9/11 world. We must accept that we're all potential terrorists and should endeavour to keep our profile low. Mediocrity and conformity mean safety.

  8. Not as fun. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a strong sense of accomplishment if you are able to do things from scratch, or closer to scratch, where you are involved in more of the process. Saying I need a board with this spec to a vender and get an overnight shipping, vs. actually designing it yourself, printing it out.

    Efficiency isn't always the goal. Efficiency is boring, because it is about standardizing the process, it is about taking joy out of learning and just focusing on mass production. Building experimenting and learning have value as well. If you make your own board you get a good feel on how things are setup and working, if there is a problem you can more easily diagnose problems, and you really learn what is happening.

    Of course if your boss's Business school didn't cover Business ethics in nauseum, like mine did. that may not be the best argument. However you can bring up the efficiency of being able to print multiple per day allowing your development time to increase as you can try multiple versions per day, and the cost of man hours will be less than the cost to of the equipment.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Not as fun. by iTrawl · · Score: 1

      You can only have so much fun and learn so much before it gets boring and you need to move up a level (level up?). The next level might be less fun if you have to continue making the boards yourself.

      Building a computer one resistor at a time is fun, unless you have to do it over and over again.

      --
      "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
    2. Re:Not as fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is much like cooking.

      For example many dishes call for a tomato sauce. Many cook books go thru huge lengths to make your own. I use Alton Browns advice with most of them. I buy a jar of Classico that is close to what I want. Toss in a few extra spices. About the same cost and it is already 2 hours 'done'. But if I am looking for a particular type of tomato then that does not work. 99% of the time though it works. After your about 5th round of making a tomato sauce it is work. When you want to play with a new meal you are trying out spending 2 hours making yet another mashed up tomato sauce is boring. You need to pick when you want to shortcut and not.

      If you are waiting 5-10 days on parts then waiting 5-10 days at the same time to buy the board is no big deal. But if you want it done now and already have most of the parts then yeah maybe etch your own.

      It is about trade offs and what you are trying to do.

    3. Re:Not as fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Building a computer [theregister.co.uk] one resistor at a time is fun

      Obviously it's all about the building, since what you end up with is huge, slow, and expensive! :)

  9. Not that much effort by gweihir · · Score: 1

    I do laser-print on good-quality paper, directly onto photo-resist (no oil, film, etc.) and what takes longest is the exposure and quality is very good. Sure, double-sided or multi-layer or large and complex I would have manufactured fore me, and standard-things like SOP/SSOP adapters I have on stock, they are just so cheap on Ebay. The other alternative for more complicated circuitry is to use transformer wire and proto-boards and I made very good experiences with that for all sorts of circuits.

    Still, PCB-making is a valid skill to have in ones toolbox.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Not that much effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, PCB-making is a valid skill to have in ones toolbox.

      Just don't tell Sangamon Taylor.

  10. It depends by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    Single side PCB can be made easily with a laserjet printer and a laminator. Doing double side boards and getting proper alignement is a bit more tricky: however if you can do them, through holes are to be soldered by hand. Probably it is wiser to have double-sided boards manifactured somewhere.
    However I must say that I seldom make anymore my PCBs: Manhattan-style assembling is very effective for most circuits I build.

    1. Re:It depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it has that name! I've been doing "Manhattan Style" for over four decades. (Analog.) I've always heard it referred to as "Dead Bug Construction".

      A few tricks- don't use Superglue, at least not at first. Use Candle Wax. Easier to move things around as the circuit develops. Use Epoxy for things like Switches or Pots that get twiddled a lot.
      Scrap Ribbon cable is your friend for making closely spaced solder joints.
      SMDs are not a problem- solder leads to the SMDs, and then proceed as usual.
      Since there are no Electrical through-holes, the Baseboard can be anything. I've got some fine Vintage Teak Plywood. Even better is Bruynzeel Mahogany Ply, which varnishes beautifully.
      The usual Caveats apply- keep Signal leads well away from Power leads, and if using Colored wiring, stay to a System- Red for B+, Black for Ground, Green for Signal, Brown for Control, etc.
      The concept of Single-Point Grounding is easy to implement- any old Copper Penny will do.
      Cut Aluminum sheet to fit for Heat Sinks. In a pinch, cut up a Beer can.
      For off-board connections, don't use Binding Posts, use Fahnestock clips. ~15 cents apiece in quantity, and some will take a Banana Plug.

    2. Re:It depends by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "SMDs are not a problem- solder leads to the SMDs, and then proceed as usual."

      Yea, you try that with thermally-sensitive things like high-power LEDs and see how long that prototype lasts.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:It depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yea, you try that with thermally-sensitive things like high-power LEDs and see how long that prototype lasts."
      I'm actually doing these kinds of things, right now, with those "high-power LEDs" of yours. (This Post is sponsored by the first AC in this thread.) The right amount of Heat, the right amount of Flux, the right amount of Solder, and the right amount of Time... I can solder Metallic Eyelashes together. There is no Interest or Markets for this, however.

      You have absolutely no concept of what "Prototyping" involves.
      Prototyping involves Failure, for much of the While.

      Yet for Prototyping Successes... I've done that, many times over the Decades, and then I let Others take the subsequent Profit. So what?
      I'm already Reasonably Wealthy.

      Now, the Trick for stringing four "high-power LEDs" together, is in matching the Forward Conductances, so that the nominal ~12.8VDC load is distributed equally among them. (Heat Sinks are trivial without Resistive Losses.)
      I then use a Low-Dropout 12.6VDC Regulated Bus for the Lighting Bus Standard, and then... Bob's Your Uncle.

      Another Trick, of course, is translating what happens in the Lab, to what happens on the Shop Floor.
      I'm not interested in that.
      I Prototype.

    4. Re:It depends by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "I'm actually doing these kinds of things, right now, with those "high-power LEDs" of yours."

      I guarantee you are NOT working with anything CLOSE to the power range I'm working on. Even then - you aren't soldering a lead to the thermal pad of a 1W LED and getting it to operate at FULL DRIVE for more than a few seconds before it burns itself out. You've just totally screwed the thermal profile of the LED. There's a reason it has a huge 5x7mm pad and not a tiny-ass leg like your cheap-ass 5mm 'High power' LEDs.

      Go mount a tiny leg to an MK-R and drive it full power, and try using that tiny leg for a heat transfer mechanism.

      You're so full of shit.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  11. Needless assumption by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    The author assumes the goal is to get a working board. Not so, the goal can be to teach yourself and build your own skills. However, an article like this is clickbait and will make a lot of money in ads, so it pays to piss people off and then reap the rewards. Hell, it was just featured on Slashdot, wasn't it?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Needless assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The author assumes the goal is to get a working board.

      Shocking.

    2. Re:Needless assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he doesn't, he spends most of the article addressing people who want a working board (most people, even hobbyists, most of the time). Then, addressing the minority who are self-producing PCBs to learn or for handmade crafting kudos, he says, "by the way if you're doing this to learn then go ahead".

    3. Re:Needless assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The author assumes the goal is to get a working board. Not so, the goal can be to teach yourself and build your own skills.

      Yes... teach yourself how to make a WORKING BOARD, and building your skills in how to make a WORKING BOARD.

  12. Spockism by dcw3 · · Score: 0

    The needs of the few outweigh the mass production for the many.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  13. Worth doing... once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one of those things that is worth doing once, if only to understand why you don't want to do it again. It's like being able to do calculations without a calculator (or computer). It's important that you understand how to do so, but it makes no sense to do so on a regular basis.

    Also in this category: A wise man moves between zero and one pianos in his lifetime.

  14. Those chemicals have never really appealed to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been doing electronics as a hobby for 5 years or so. I'm 27 years old so pretty much the entire time I've been interested in electronics cheap hobby PCB manufacture has been available.

    For prototyping, I use breadboard. To be honest the PCB etching has never really appealed. You have to mess around with laser printing, chemical etching, drilling holes, larger track sizes and single side only unless you can do your own PTH. If it's something I really want to keep, but don't want to do a PCB I just transfer it from breadboard to this : http://www.adafruit.com/products/571

    At this stage I'm designing circuits to sell with several hundred components on each, so it's easier just to design the circuit in Eagle, do the ERC and DRU checks then forget about it for two weeks while the boards are shipped from China. If I were etching this I would have to do the board layout twice and could encounter different problems on each. It saves my spare time for doing other stuff.

    I think the only downside to the PCB from China method is that PCBs larger than 10x10cm become an order of magnitude more expensive. Still, it forces you to really check all your designs properly when you encounter the inevitable horror of receiving a board you designed with incorrect footprints or electrical errors.

  15. He's right... by Alioth · · Score: 1

    He's right, sort of.

    I still occasionally make a PCB if I need one quickly. Most low cost board houses will take 4-6 weeks to turn around your board, if I need one for something I'm doing this weekend, I'll hand make it. I started out making 2 layer boards they are nowhere near as hard to make as he says (at least using a toner transfer process - I've never made PCBs using UV/photo processes). I've handmade PCBs using toner transfer for 0.4mm QFP devices.

    The real issue for me is I usually want to make 4 layer+ boards with a proper ground and power plane, not only does it make routing vastly easier, but for what I'm doing I end up with a circuit that performs a lot better, too. For those there really isn't a good alternative to going to a factory. Fortunately there are quite a few low cost choices for 4 layer boards now.

    1. Re:He's right... by Orgasmatron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I second the toner transfer method. From the comments here, it doesn't appear to be anywhere near as popular as it should be.

      It works great with through-hole and surface mount devices, it requires no more special equipment than an $8 (clothes) iron from Wal-mart, and 2-layer boards are no problem. Not exactly easy, but certainly not hard either.

      If anyone is interested, buying a bag of "transistor sockets" off ebay is a good investment. They are solderable hollow tubes with a lip on one side. You press them in and solder to both layers and have a very robust via. You can solder and unsolder a leg there without disturbing your via.

      To be honest, I don't do it very often any more. I think I do more PCBs by hand with a sharpie now than I do using laser toner, but that number is small too. I rarely need a board right away, and I very rarely need just one board. For me, I tend to need a half dozen of something, eventually. Like 12v battery pseudo-UPS boards for my home's Raspberry Pi sensor network, or G-M tube alarm boards for a vehicle fleet.

      I tend to design the PCB directly, then build the prototype on a solderless breadboard using the netlist, feed corrections back to the design, then send it off for fabrication with oshpark.

      To do that, you need a good collection of SMD to 0.1" carriers. Carriers for most packages are readily available, but I've had to make a couple myself (by drawing up the footprint and pins and sending it off for fabrication).

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
  16. Why not wire wrap? by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    If all I need is one or two boards, I just wire wrap. I have no idea why so few people talk about this in the maker community.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Why not wire wrap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now get a robot to wire wrap the board for you from a schematic. That would be a little more interesting.

    2. Re:Why not wire wrap? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why so few people talk about this in the maker community.

      Probably because so much is done with SMT components now. There are plenty of components that aren't even available in through-hole packages.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    3. Re:Why not wire wrap? by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      SMT is a challenge for DIY regardless of what technique you use, especially if your eyesight is not excellent and your hands are not very steady. I use SMT to through hole adaptors.

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    4. Re:Why not wire wrap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple i quite like wire wrap BUT the sockets cost an arm and a leg hence i have not been able to do it for years, proto-board for me,
      BUT just moving from 8 bit micros ( pic etc ) and pic32 on modules ( for through hole mounting ) and starting to play with 68030 and am presently using wire-wrap wire and perfboard, the performance etc WILL be poorer han a proper pcb OR decent wirewrap sockets but it is 'affordable' like a lot of hobby level people i get
      a large percentage of my parts from scrap and having a low income cant afford factory pcb's allthough i am now considering it due to the complexity of what i am building making mistakes both more likely AND harder to put right.

  17. Kirk? by Coisiche · · Score: 4, Funny

    The reaction was worse than when Kirk told the Star Trek fans to get a life.

    Shatner surely. It would all be a bit meta for James Kirk to decry Star Trek fans.

    1. Re:Kirk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It would all be a bit meta for James Kirk to decry Star Trek fans.

      Not for Evil Kirk!

  18. Because it Works! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1) Learn to use CAD Package
    2) Spend two weeks laying out a board using said CAD package when doing the job by hand would take a couple of days
    3) Email design to PCB house in China
    4) Wait six weeks
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    5) Wait in for DHL delivery, driver sticks a card in the mailbox and never rings the bell
    6) Go to DHL depot and collect parcel of PCBs
    7) Open box to find that you've designed one side of your PCB in mirror image and all your boards are trash
    8) GOTO (3)

    Or, design on a piece of paper and etch it yourself using ferric chloride.

    1. Re:Because it Works! by garry_g · · Score: 1

      You're doing it wrong.

      1) Learn to use a PCB Design CAD Tool that let's you actually do the electronic circuit and provides all the layout items for you
      2) send it off to a DECENT PCB house
      3) wait 1-14 days depending on how much you are willing to spend
      4) get professionally etched PCBs back, with decent through-connections, dual or multi-layer, stop mask, etc.

      Of course, even this process won't keep you from making stupid mistakes. Just as you can do stupid mistakes if you etch it yourself. But as for the mirrored reverse side - any DECENT PCB house will notice as the drill holes won't match up. They'll contact you, or correct it for you.

    2. Re:Because it Works! by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      3) wait 1-14 days depending on how much you are willing to spend

      I'm not willing to spend more than 3x the cost of the components that are going on my board. Know of any "decent" PCB manufacturers that'll make a board for less than that (including shipping) and get it here before I can draw the thing with a sharpie and wipe it off with some etching solution?

    3. Re:Because it Works! by garry_g · · Score: 1

      All the PCBs I've needed to date I wouldn't have been able to prepare without decent (read: pricey) equipment ... double sided, through-contacts, partly 2 leads between 2.54mm spaced solder pads ... no way you'd be able to come even close to the quality (and reliabilty) with a sharpie ... get to SMD, and you're f'cked trying to do it at home at ANY reasonable cost ...

  19. Jay Leno and the American motor cycles. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Jay Leno is more widely known as the stand up show host and less widely known for his motor/motor cycle collection.

    But he also wrote a more serious column for Car and Driver. He once talked about the decline of American motor cycle industry. Famous names like Indian Chief etc and how they all foundered. Basically they produced machines which were difficult to maintain at good condition. Every three thousand miles people had to disassemble the cylinder head and decarbonize them and reset the valves and timing etc etc. The honchos in the companies were proud their customers like to get their hands dirty, they like working on these engines. Jay Leno said, "no, we don't like messing with these engines. We want to ride and have fun. But it was impossible to get good performance without doing all these things. We were forced to do it because your engines were crappy". When Honda and Yamaha started making reliable machines that delivered good performance for long times without these messy requirements, they just ate the lunch of the old style American motorcycle manufacturers. Only Harley survived, but it was touch and go for even for them.

    People like making things that work. Ages ago the only way to do it was to make your own PCB. Now a days with one day turn around, most people would like to outsource making the pcb to make sure there are no accidental contacts, no mistakenly erased and redrawn line not making full contact, making sure all the holes are drilled all the way through and there is no delamination etc. Hand made PCBs are the equivalent of your motorcycle rider decarbonizing the engine head instead of riding fast on the wide open highways of America.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Jay Leno and the American motor cycles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nailed it.

    2. Re:Jay Leno and the American motor cycles. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      These days it's pretty difficult to make a high quality engine that is reliable and meets all emissions standards without CNC and other advanced manufacturing techniques. Similarly, it is getting harder and harder to make PCBs when parts are getting smaller. We are already at the point where there are lot of useful chips that only come in no-lead packages, making them very time consuming to solder by hand. Most semi-serious hobbyists are moving to cheap ovens and PCB manufacturers that provide stencils.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  20. PC boards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Hackaday author told the hackers that it isn't worth making your own PCB boards anymore.

    FTFY

    1. Re:PC boards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you think they meant to say

      A Hackaday author told the hackers that it isn't worth making your own printed circuit board boards anymore.

      ?

    2. Re:PC boards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PCB = printed circuit board. PC boards is also acceptable. PCB boards = printed circuit boards boards is redundant. Your fix is stupid.

  21. Besides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He uses old school etching.

    People in the known, will be using muriatic acid with perroxide hydrogen (both common, and easy to recycle after use).

    There are also UV sensitive films that can be applied on the copper with a hair drier. And those are by themselfs etched by caustic soda (another easy to recycle chemical).

    But, i'm not an expert, so check your recycling and chemical wasting guidelines in the area you live on.

  22. Get a cheap CNC milling machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Downside is you need to prep artwork for where the tracks get cut, but no big deal in Inkscape or the like. And you'd have to create artwork whichever method you use.

    It has the additional advantage of drilling the holes spot on, plus you can cut the board to any desired shape.

    Doubled-sided boards aren't hard to align - just reference off the holes you've already drilled.

    Very thin tracks can be done with a pointed dental burr. You can even go between IC pins with a bit of care and attention. 0.8mm pear-shaped work well. They're very cheap, but HSS versions don't last forever. Also expect to break a few if you try to go too fast - 10mm/min is about the safe limit @ 2500rpm.

    If you can't afford a machine up front, join/form a hackerspace. Loads of additional uses for a tabletop CNC as well...

    Of course, it's still not as good as a proper PCB, but it's a good option for one-offs or testing out a board before ordering a batch.

  23. IUTBAESD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (I Used To Be An Embedded Systems Designer)

    This is nonsense, we (typically the royal we) could have an idea netted, fabbed, populated (tweezers, paste dispenser and a steady hand) and in front of a software engineer by lunchtime. We had some nice gear like CNC PCB mills, spray etchers and computer controlled re-flow ovens but there is nothing that couldn't be done at home with acetate and a pizza oven.

    As an aside, sending stuff out for assembly isn't always a walk in the park, we had some custom dev boards come back from India where they had decided to re-drill all the through-plated holes for the header pins because the ones they had on the self didn't fit. We had to go back and top-solder ~200 pins a board to get them working.

  24. Darkrooms by jrumney · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Making your own PCBs makes as much sense as developing your own photos ever did. People do it because they like doing it, to learn, or to mess around with the results for fun/art. No one makes their own PCBs out of necessity or efficiency.

    1. Re:Darkrooms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making your own PCBs makes as much sense as developing your own photos ever did. People do it because they like doing it, to learn, or to mess around with the results for fun/art. No one makes their own PCBs out of necessity or efficiency.

      You need a marker or transfer label (for the design), a virgin (blank) PCB and some Iron chloride. It's not that difficult, I use to do this all the time in highschool at the age of 13 and 14

  25. Wrong Writer Attitude by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm one of the people who reacted negatively to that article and you draw the entire thing in the wrong light. I don't react negatively to someone pointing out the great cost and quality of pre-fab PCB houses. I use them a lot for many projects. However I lost it when I got to the bit which said:

    But I never do that anymore. It simply isn’t worth it. You shouldn’t either.

    What the heck does this self-important know it all know about my projects and what I should be doing with them? He doesn't know how soon I need them, how big they are. He doesn't know if it's a 1x1" board where the cost of manufacture is dwarfed by shipping costs. He doesn't know if I live in Shenzhen right next to the manufacturer or on a small Pacific island which only gets mail every 2 months.

    It is even worse considering the crowd he is pandering to. Hack a day is filled with people who do things because they need something fast, now, just something quick that will work, or need something they can make out of the crap they have lying at home because they couldn't be stuffed going to the store. He even knew this:

    Don’t get me wrong. No one that reads Hackaday needs to be told why someone wants to build something even though they could buy it somewhere else. I

    .

    There is nothing wrong with buying PCB houses if you have a project where it makes financial sense to do so and you're happy to wait 2-6 weeks to get the resulting board. I hate making circuit boards. Yet I still make them myself because the conditions of what I'm doing call for it.

    By the way I am writing this from a Surface tablet. I'm not using a desktop right now, and neither should you. What would you think of a Slashdot article like that? Praise the author for his ability to chose something that suits him?

    1. Re:Wrong Writer Attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fell for the click-bait. The writer needs eyeballs, and the best way to get them is to come across as a know-it-all better-than-thou type. It worked. His mandate was met.

    2. Re:Wrong Writer Attitude by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      But I never do that anymore. It simply isnâ(TM)t worth it. You shouldnâ(TM)t either.

      What the heck does this self-important know it all know about my projects and what I should be doing with them?

      Exactly. It's not about whether the opinion is right or wrong - it's about the lecture. Most grown people don't want to be lectured about what they "should" or "should" not do. Maybe people disagree with the logic, or have different goals. Maybe they want to simply do something somebody else thinks is irrational.

      I had enough lectures when I was a kid. I'm grown now and don't usually put up with it when people lecture me. (But I try to keep my emotions in check and not get in a big fight with them; instead, if they don't stop it after I let them know they are bothering me, I try to just get away from them without debating it further.)

    3. Re:Wrong Writer Attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must hate watching TV or reading the newspaper where people tell me all the time what to do, what to think, and how to act. Since I grew up, I learned I can evaluate the merits of what they are saying and make my own decision. I don't think the surface tablet analogy is fair. Plus, did you read the whole article? He says there are some cases where it makes sense (fast turn prototyping or if you just want to do it because that is what gets your geek on) but if you want the end result, it is cheap and easy to get nice boards made now. So your analogy should be something more like: I'm writing this post on a computer instead of sending it via morse code. You should too! Well, yeah. Which doesn't mean a lot of hams don't LIKE to use morse code. It just means that it might not be the most efficient way of reaching an audience. Honestly, though. Having such a visceral reaction to someone "telling you what you should do" (in a pretty unoffensive way, IMO) is a sign you should be looking at how you feel about yourself. Oh cr@p, now I've told you what to do too.

  26. Hand crafting by CaptainOfSpray · · Score: 1

    I hew my one-bits out of the living face of Chaos. I thought everybody did that.

    --
    "Cock Up Your Beaver" does not mean what you think. This sig is intended to clog filters and annoy do-gooders
    1. Re:Hand crafting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You don't create your own Chaos by force of will? And you call yourself a hacker? Shame on you. Shame!

  27. Wha??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The entire point of building your own board (other than the sure joy of learning and building) is to not be subject to the whims of a handful of global manufacturers.

    Only an asshat would suggest makers stop making. What the hell

  28. wire wrap by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone wire wrap any more?
    Today I spotted a wrapped board in my dad's workshop, he's 88.

    --
    Go well
    1. Re:wire wrap by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Last time I did was in 20th century. First wire everything with blue wires. Fixes are then done with red wires. Now what can be ironic is when all is said and done after thorough troubleshooting/correcting mistakes, is the final product has 90% red wires.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    2. Re:wire wrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Doesn't anyone wire wrap any more?

      Phoebe Cates walked in on me while I was wire-wrapping... :-P

  29. By all means send your designs to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody is keeping a copy and reverse engineering what you're working on. Nope.

    1. Re:By all means send your designs to China by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      There are lots of great PCB manufacturers in the US, and if you want 'em fast, that's the way to go.

  30. There's one thing DIY wins at... by dohzer · · Score: 1

    ... and it's known as time.
    You can't do SMD easily with a breadboard.
    And you can't have every breakout board at your fingertips with the crazy packages they invent on a daily basis.
    Sometimes custome copper is a necessity.

  31. Next they are going to tell me... by frnic · · Score: 1

    To quit making my own IC's. I just perfected using mini ice cube trays to place the components into and pour in a potting ceramic. Works great!

    1. Re:Next they are going to tell me... by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Doping the silicon with a pipette and a microscope is time-consuming, but worth it!

  32. There are still reasons to do it yourself by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They just get fewer. A decade or two ago, doing your own PCBs was pretty much a requirement if you wanted to work with PCBs and wire-wrapping or pre-made hole boards were not cutting it for you. Today, for most applications you can easily and rather cheaply buy PCBs that are usually superior in quality and also usually more likely to work as designed.

    There are a few reasons I still do my own PCBs from time to time. Mind you, the applications get fewer and I think the last time I actually etched one has been at least 6 months ago.

    - You wanna.
    Always a good reason. You want to do it because it's for something special, maybe a gift or something where hand made from start to finish actually means something. Sentimental value and all that. Also, it's fun. At least the first couple dozen times, then it just gets boring.

    - Security/secrecy reasons.
    There are always those designs you can't give to someone else. This is less a concern for most people, but there are applications where I certainly wouldn't want the design to go to some Chinese company before I can present it at the next Security Conference. Because I wanna make the speech. ;)

    - Time
    Yes, overnight is possible. Expensive (around here overnight costs upwards of 50 bucks for a simple PCB), but possible. Still sometimes too slow if you need it NOW. Or if you can't wait the 4-6 weeks that the budget price could get you. Because ...

    - Some designs can only be tested on a PCB
    Especially touch designs are extremely hard to test sensibly on a breadboard because their behaviour depends highly on the layout of the PCB. Other times you're running into timing issues if you're working with very fast switching signals. Breadboards simply don't cut it with all applications you may encounter. More and more "modern" designs (wireless devices, PC components, etc) can hardly be remodeled on breadboards.

    As soon as the design is done and I need a batch of PCBs, there is no question about whether I want to do them myself or whether I want them to be done by someone who can crank out a few dozen per batch. Designing can actually still mean etching your own. Not as much as it used to, but there are still applications that give you an excuse to indulge in your rubber glove fetish.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. No. by pz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The beer-free tools for PCB creation have become incredibly good recently, with the exception of autorouting which is still not so great at the inexpensive end of the market.

    Small-quantity PCB services are ridiculously inexpensive at often only a few dollars per board, delivered.

    Component pitch has shrunk to the point that making fine lines for most chips is really hard with hobbyist etching tools. Forget vias.

    So when are DIY PCBs useful? Maybe with single-sided surface mount boards that have medium-pitch components when board quality isn't so important, and you need it in hours, not days-to-weeks.

    When does that happen? Never, for me. Really, never.

    Add in the storage and surface areas required for the chemicals and processing, the setup/cleanup time, the toxicity of the chemicals, and there's a very good reason I have not ever, not once, even considered making my own PCB.

    When I need to prototype circuits, point-to-point works really well, and using SMT adapters that are also ridiculously inexpensive. And even then, the battles you have to wage with noise coupled with the really inexpensive costs of professionally-made boards make it almost not worth constructing point-to-point (and in my experience, breadboards universally suck).

    So should you make your own PCBs? If the making of the PCB isn't an end until itself for the pleasure of constructing the board, then the answer is, "no." If you like playing with resist layers, electroetch, and stuff like that, then sure. I mean, you could wind your own resistors, too, if you really wanted to. And there's a fellow who makes his own tubes, too (he's amazing, and I admire the skill). But buy your PCBs, don't make them.
     

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and there's a very good reason I have not ever, not once, even considered making my own PCB.

      You admit you have no idea what you're talking about, yet you can't help but climb on your high horse and tell all those who do that they're wrong?

      No simpler way to say it, man. You're an idiot. Please shut up now.

  34. I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Privacy is constantly under attack. Unless you want your name, address, phone number, purchasing history, etc. etc. in some database that will be farmed by some government 3 letter agency, then you have all the reason in the world to make your own boards.

    There are lots of people that would be willing to pay YOU to make boards for them as long as it was paid in cash and Anonymous, just to avoid those abuses.

    1. Re:I disagree. by src1138 · · Score: 1

      Wow. You must be making some serious stuff to be interesting to government agencies. You think they don't already know this stuff about you?

      I wouldn't want to bother making stuff for an anonymous client anyways - I would think they were up to no good or overly paranoid and delusional. Got better stuff to do, like post snarky comments.

  35. Hobby how you want to by goodmanj · · Score: 2

    Making your own circuitboards is almost never the best option. But making your own cloth with a hand loom is almost never the best option either, and people do that for fun all the time. If you're taking advice from a Hackaday author, you're probably a hobbyist, and you can hobby however you want to.

  36. Keep the craft alive ... by MacTO · · Score: 1

    Does it make sense? Not really. As the HaD author pointed out: creating your own boards is more hazardous, offers fewer options for multilayer boards, and is less precise.

    On the other hand, we are talking about HaD. If the point was to get a device that does what we want of it, we could buy almost anything off the shelf and sites like HaD would have very little rational for existence. More critically the environment of learning, creativity, independence, and (insert your motivation to make/hack/DIY) would have very little rationale.

    1. Re:Keep the craft alive ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh. You have to pick your battles. Even the auther says: if you want to make the PCB for the sake of it.... But where do you stop? Are you not a hacker if you use an Arduino? A MPU? An FPGA? Store bought transistors? If your project is to go to Disneyland, you don't need to build your own car to do it. So if I want to develop a new IoT device, why should making my own PCB be part of it? We all use tools and built up layers of abstraction. I think the point is: are you making boards when you should be making circuits? And I agree.

  37. Craftmanship, learning, and understanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha! I didn't read the article, but I have my opinions too. I call BS. These articles pop up now and again. As technologists, DIYers, and Hobbyists, there are all varying degrees of need. I make double-sided PCBs at home in my basement because I can do it in 2 hours. Sure, it's not going to look great, but I'm not selling the thing. I'm making it for myself. Just like J.G. Wentworth: It's my PCB, and I want it now. I don't want to wait 1 or 2 weeks, and I definitely don't want to spend $20 on something that I could do for $2.

    Plus...there's an art to this process. It's not hard, but it does require some experimentation. I'm proud of myself for knowing that I can do it.

    1. Re:Craftmanship, learning, and understanding by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Not sure if this is relevant but here goes: I was thinking about my early days in electronics, and learning craftsman skills (or learning how not to?). I built a shortwave receiver kit from Radio Shack using one of those 200W Weller soldering guns (yes, shaped like a pistol, big and fat, and not temperature controlled). Solder points were large blobs but the radio seemed to work ok. Easily pick up WWV and also listen to ship-to-shore radiotelephone in the 2MHz bands from stinking rich families in their boats near San Pedro, I was in Northern Calif. Radio was a "desk set" but power for it was 12VDC. I thought this would be cool to have a HF receiver in the car. My mom let me mount one of those long CB whips on the bumper, but had no idea how good or bad because in those days spark plugs and points were immensely noisy so all I heard was static on the radio. Overall I had fun learning.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  38. Don't forget surfboards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These little boogers are handy. I don't like wire wrap any more; just get me a way to mount all the SMT chips on little boards connected with wire....

  39. It hasn't made since for a decade or more.. by xtal · · Score: 2

    I don't do much of this anymore, but I have designed hundreds of commercial boards and likely into the thousands of prototypes.

    In the late 90's people used routers and crude lithographic techniques; these got better, but the online services scale nicely, and if you add up all the costs, it's almost insane to try and do it yourself. Why?

    For entertainment purposes - that's different - but there hasn't been a commercial case for some time.

    In fact, they're so cheap now, what hands on work I do, I just spin a PCB even for prototype purposes.

    --
    ..don't panic
  40. It is engineering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In engineering, the answer is _always_:
    It depends....

    If I only need a few, they are fairly simple, and they are 'blocking' my critical task... it is ALWAYS faster to make them myself and be done vice spend days running thru the purchasing department's crap procedures.

    Also, if you count the people who are also 'blocked' waiting on the boards... it is WAY CHEAPER for me to make them too. No matter what my hourly rate is.

    if I need a medium volume of the boards... sure, outsource them.... and production? I would never let a hand-made board leave the loadingdock for delivery to a customer.

    My 2 cents...

  41. Hobbyists/Enthusiasts by xenotransplant · · Score: 1

    Look at hot-rodders. Does it make sense to rebuild and blueprint a1939 flathead v8? No. It makes absolutely no sense at all. Yet people do it. Because it is their passion. Does it make sense to spend $600-$1000 building a custom water cooling loop on my home pc? Nope. I still do it though.

  42. Hipster Makers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will be the next front of "authenticity" among hipster makers.

    Hipster makers will have been making their own boards since before making your own boards was cool.

  43. good reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be able to understand - learning has value. If you want someone to masterfully understand computers, have them make one from scratch.
    Economics - if nobody makes them, then the vendors prices will go up and the quality will go down.

  44. Now if we could do this for enclosures by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    IMHO, one big missing piece to ultra-short-run production of electronic products is the ability for a DIYer to make production-quality enclosures in small quantities that aren't stupid expensive. I had (and still have) high hopes for 3D printing to solve this but current technology is slow and prone to mid-print failures. Plus, the results are lacking in appearance of a finished product.

  45. Circuit printers? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    How about the various circuit printers that are coming on the market now, like the Argentum or the Voltera? They're not cheap ($1500-2000), but they're probably a lot faster/cleaner/more precise than trying to etch it yourself. Voltera is capable of printing pseudo two-layer PCBs, since it has both a conductive solderable ink, and an insulating ink ink: when a trace needs to cross another, it uses the insulating ink to create a bridge, and then prints the second trace crossing over the first.

  46. Mechanical etch is the answer ! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its quite easy with Protomat (LPKF) and also, if one assumes that he makes not only protos but also "test runs" lets say 5..20 units, Protomat is very useful for patching factory-pcbs.
    Double sided ? I have used fine soldered wires instead of the conductive glue and other junk. And actually, it takes only 30 minutes to add jumper wires (vias) to medium sized board.

    So, if you can afford, Protomat is good. But dont use anything without tool magazine. Because then you have to babysit the machine and its horribly boring. Otherwise, leaving Protomat to mill a pcb for 2-4 hours is no problem, when you have experience. And the only babysitting needed is flipping the board for milling reverse side. They have a conductive epoxy for filling vias too, but its quite limited and fragile, although its usable in some situations (havent used it for many years but it has saved me sometimes in the past)

    But anything which involves chemistry... NO and if you hope to make vias in home, then NO NO NO. Its either absurdly expensive (LPKF via plating) or very messy and hard to maintain and chemicals will have limited lifetime. Or both. Of course, its fun to try etching and plating but if you need a pcb fast, then dont mess with chemistry !

    I happen to own small PCB factory, and we have full-time chemistry engineer taking care of solutions. Hard and expensive work, nothing hobbyist-grade there !

  47. yes and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, Sr PCB Designer here... 23 years in the industry. for ANY company no of course it doesn't makes sense and the bennies from a fabricated board are always going to outweigh doing a handjob. Even a 2-4 layer protomat style quick job is better than a hand etched board.

    for a hobbyist the ACT of making one themselves is as important as the end product. It's about doing it all themselves.. Hell I have done them by hand myself because *I* wanted to make the board not send out Gerbs and have it show up on my doorstep 3-4 days later.

  48. No, because TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it make sense for TFA to post a link to some good PCB printing online services?

  49. If you don't mind the turnaround wait... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    ... then you may as well outsource your PCB creation.

    But I see the factor of a delay as less of a matter of whether or not one *NEEDS* to have it done quickly and more simply a matter of whether getting it done right away is simply something that they might *want*.

    But what would bother me a lot is if people didn't have a choice... or if any so-called choice was actually a non-issue because only one of the options is actually both practical and readily available to them.

  50. For amateurs, it's the making not the having. by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    The guy who said this seems to be disconnected from the "maker" world. Amateurs make stuff in the full knowledge that it would be cheaper and faster to buy a ready-made pruduct that would (probably) have more features, be more reliable, DEFINITELY have a better quality enclosure and in all likelyhood be smaller, too.

    But that's not the point. Amateurs make stuff: electronics and software because they like it. They know that there are alternatives that are better but there's no fun in that. There's no satisfaction in the knowledge that something is your own work, possibly your own design and in the true spirit of ameteur-ism, completely undocumented and an utter mystery to anyone else who would ever try to work out what it does, or how it does it.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:For amateurs, it's the making not the having. by beheaderaswp · · Score: 1

      Additionally, if I'm engineering a radio system, I want to know every solder joint in the system.

      If I'm selling a system- it goes to the customer with off the shelf components.

      --
      Another consultant who stuck it out.

      "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    2. Re:For amateurs, it's the making not the having. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but where do you stop? So it isn't a maker project if you buy resistors at Radio Shack? Or active devices? What about ICs? Oh no! You bought your CPU already made.... sniff sniff... well, I guess that's ok for someone of your limited ability..... I mean seriously, is it the making of the board or is it some maker ritual to get FeCl3 stains on your fingers (mentat stains, maybe). What is the magic about the PCB that you can buy other things that you can get better but not the PCB. Besides, did you read the post? The guy clearly says some people want to do it for the challenge or the learning and that's fine. But by your logic, if I want to go to Disney, I should first build a car to get there.

  51. Ahem... by beheaderaswp · · Score: 1

    Look at all the super low member numbers in this thread....

    We are showing our age boys!

    I'm actually running out of 70/30 BTW.

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    1. Re:Ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, the high-number members can't do anything if it's not software with a drag-and-drool IDE and 50 GB worth of PHP or JavaScript framework.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go mix up another batch of clay and carbon powder for these resistors I'm making, then separate out some more mica layers for the capacitors.

    2. Re:Ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You finished drawing out your copper wire? Awesome!

  52. ExpressPCB by msc.buff · · Score: 1

    I use their board service and their software and it works great for my little project boards. I can work something up over the weekend, get my order in on Monday, and by Friday I have my boards.

    http://www.expresspcb.com/

    I haven't used them in a while but when I checked their link it looks like they updated the software so I will have to check that out.

  53. Board Printing with Pick and Place is the Future by Kagato · · Score: 1

    One of the Tech Crunch 2015 winners was Voltara V-One. Target price is sub-$2k (eventually) for a machine that will do 2-layer PCB printing, insulation curing, solder paste dispensing and reflow. Might be expensive for the home user, but I can see Maker workshops installing them.

    It's not even the first PCB printer, there are several on the market already in the $3K range.

  54. Not if you want it made here. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    No thanks, but I'm not handing anything off to China given their predisposition to copy anything you hand them - and make their own knockoff.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  55. No one answer by src1138 · · Score: 1

    In my experience, it's kind of fun to start off making a few PCBs and wire-wrap boards - I learned a lot by doing it. After a while I got tired of it and only do it occasionally, but now usually do breadboard>proto-board/wire-wrap>PCB house. I'll sometimes substitute a home-made PCB (sometimes just a few discrete modules to plug in) for the proto/wire-wrap if the layout is too messy otherwise.

    I wouldn't knock it - it's kinds fun to make artistic traces and make the board itself a functional work of art.

  56. give it away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to give your prototypes away to whomever is going to produce your board, by all means, eliminate the need for corporate espionage by publishing your work.

  57. It's like Calculus by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    If you aren't learning it, 'hands-on', then you're not really soaking the concepts into your brain.

    Calculus– Use pencil and paper. Lots of paper.

    Circuits –Yes, bread-boarding is fine, but when you want to prototype, tightly integrating the components, w/soldered connections, then you should go through the process and do it for yourself. At least once.

  58. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cost of doing it by hand adds up quickly. You can get per board costs so low that just to buy the chemicals and equipment can easily be 5x.

  59. Yes, it is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In these days, constructing a homemade circuit board is a relatively simple and straightforward task. With some basic tools and a few hours to spare, anyone can build their own circuit board. see here: http://www.syspcb.com/News/329.htm

    But if your PCB is for business use, not just for hobby, get PCBs from PCB manufacturers is a better idea.

  60. All depends by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    Like a lot of questions, it all depends.

    If you are more interested in the results and have the time needed, and the money, then ordering circuit boards is now reasonable to be considered. But there are many things to consider. Making your own, if you can do it reliably and quickly, can definately be good.

    Particularly, if the order has a minimum quantity and you need more testing to be sure you will not have to throw them away! Like I had to once, when prices were $400 each for minimum 100. 8-(