Slashdot Mirror


BlackBerry Launches Android Smartphone

wiredmikey writes: In an attempt to come back from the dead, BlackBerry announced plans to sell an Android-powered smartphone. The struggling Canadian smartphone maker said it would begin selling "Priv," described as "a flagship handheld device that will run on the Android operating system with BlackBerry security," expected to be available later this year. The company isn't giving up on its own operating system, and will continue to develop and enhance its BlackBerry 10 platform, which currently represents less than one percent of smartphone users.

127 comments

  1. 6 years by danbob999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They are 6 years too late.

    1. Re:6 years by narcc · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It was a stupid idea then, and it's a stupid idea now. "Hey, let's toss out every advantage we have and become another me-too player in a crowded market!"

      Android hasn't exactly been a path to success for anyone but Samsung. Their own OS, QNX, is superior in just about every way imaginable, including development tools.

      The board should have fired Chen just for suggesting they do something this foolish.

    2. Re:6 years by iONiUM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree, I think it's a very smart idea. Regardless of whether QNX is superior or not technically, it no longer matters. They've lost because people want to use what is popular (and has apps), and Android and iOS are it.

      If they can take Android, which is open source, and create their own fork of it which is proven to be much more secure yet can still use the Android app eco-system, it could very well be a big hit when combined with good QWERTY phones.

      As such, I agree with the OP, they should have done it a long time ago, and I think it's too late now.

      DISCLAIMER: I've had a BB Z10 and Q10 since they came out, and love the keyboard, but I also have a Nexus 5 which I use almost exclusively because of all the problems I have with the BB phones.

    3. Re:6 years by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Um, did you even read the summary? They're not tossing out BBOS, this is in addition to it. Moreover, it's not "me-too", they're supposedly adding BB security to Android, to make this more than just yet-another-Android.

      Now of course, I'm rather dubious that their efforts are going to pan out here, but just going by the summary, it's certainly not a case of "let's toss out what makes us unique and become another me-too player in a crowded market".

      Finally, their big "advantage" (the BB OS and ecosystem and such) doesn't seem to be much of an "advantage" if they're "struggling". If it was such an advantage, they'd have a strong business, even if it doesn't have the most marketshare. There's lots of companies that have very strong and profitable businesses catering to niche markets (such as government). BB doesn't seem to be one of them. Maybe it's just time for them to throw in the towel.

      As for Android being a success, those other companies are still making a profit, are they not? They might not be making Samsung profits, but most of them I presume are making some kind of profit, or else they'd be throwing in the towel too.

    4. Re:6 years by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      Android hasn't exactly been a path to success for anyone but Samsung.

      It's one thing not to succeed in the smartphone market. But companies who didn't succeed, such as Sony, HTC, LG, at least didn't have to develop and support a full operating system. So they lost a lot less focus than Blackberry.

      Their own OS, QNX, is superior in just about every way imaginable, including development tools.

      When did they get multitouch? WiFi hotspot? Back and front camera support? GPS? [insert any feature here]? That's right, the answer is always at least 6-12 months after the competition.
      People don't care about the OS kernel used. They care about features they see and application support. No matter how great QNX is for a nuclear power plant, it failed in the smartphone market, partly because it failed to attract developers.

      They better be a me-too player, than not be a player at all. Have they been a player in the past 3 years? I don't think so. When is it the last time you have seen someone using a Blackberry?

    5. Re:6 years by mcrbids · · Score: 2

      Regardless of whether QNX is superior or not technically, it no longer matters. They've lost because people want to use what is popular (and has apps), and Android and iOS are it.

      I'm just glad that, a few years ago, when Windows/OSX ruled the roost, that the hairy hippies didn't say this about Linux. We can crow now, that Linux is installed on more devices than any other kernel or O/S, but Linux wasn't always such a sure bet.

      Diversity is good. I welcome it. I'm hoping they digest the Android ecosystem and learn to use it to strengthen QNX.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    6. Re:6 years by acoustix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If they can take Android, which is open source, and create their own fork of it which is proven to be much more secure yet can still use the Android app eco-system, it could very well be a big hit when combined with good QWERTY phones.

      Here's the problem: Android isn't 100% open source (at least the way I understand it). The first part is obvious: Google Play Services. This is not open source, but it is needed to run many of the apps. (this is also why I can't run some of the Android apps on my BB Z10) There are also many binaries included in the Android OS where there is no code available. Because of that BlackBerry (or any other company) cannot guarantee the security of the device running Android. So they cannot have a secure device like a BB10 device.

      BlackBerry is doing what some of their supporters want: Great hardware (which is what BB is known for) running an OS with tons of apps.

      BlackBerry will continue to develop the BB10 OS because they have many customers that demand it.

      My disclaimer: I've had my Z10 since launch and I still love it. The BB10 OS is very well designed, fast and secure. I love it.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    7. Re: 6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They need to port Android onto QNX.

      Kick out the Linux bullshit and hobbiest crap and put a real RTOS under Android. Then see how responsive it becomes. Enjoy the containerisation which just works, and restartable device drivers. Enjoy the lack of churn and petty politics.

      And enjoy the security and amazing efficiency of QNX.

      Step 2. Google buy BlackBerry.

      Step 3 (dream): Open Source QNX.

    8. Re: 6 years by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      Why would a phone requires, or even perform better, with a RTOS? The phone radio already runs some RTOS. The main CPU can run Linux or iOS just fine.

    9. Re: 6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QNX is not for nuclear power plants.

      QNX is very much for embedded systems where footprint counts. It is light on memory, light on overhead and context switches quickly. It's better than Linux in a great many ways, and supported containers long before Linux.

      It's POSIX compliance is excellent (very easy to port glibc targeted C code) too.

      They aimed at automotive nav/ent systems for a long time which made it hard as nails, but had a licencing model that didn't work for mass consumer markets. When I evaluated it, they wanted a $12 per device royalty, more than the cost of the chip it would run on!!!!

    10. Re:6 years by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      You'll have to forgive narcc. He is understand the delusion that RIMM can do and has never done anything wrong. Saying something like then Playbook was incomplete when launched is a heresy! Heresy!

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    11. Re:6 years by gmack · · Score: 1

      Maybe not. I finally gave up and bought a phone without a physical keyboard and I HATE it. Everyone tells me I'll get used to it, but that never seems to happen.
      The Android Space is now dominated by phones that all look the same, act the same and have the same features and the only thing that changes is the size and the phones I loived were the first victims .

      If Blackberry gives me an Android phone with a keyboard I'm there in a flash.

    12. Re:6 years by danbob999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The BB10 OS is very well designed, fast and secure.

      How do you know how secure it is?

    13. Re:6 years by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      "Under the impression" I mean to say

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    14. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their own OS, QNX, is superior in just about every way imaginable, including development tools.

      Doesn't matter if people don't buy it. Beta was superior to vhs too. And linux is superior to windows in every way imaginable - including word processors even. And still, the majority doesn't want it. The only reason it doesn't disappear as a desktop os is the free development - so no sales needed to stay alive. Blackberry is not so lucky, so they bet on two horses now. If one fails, they have the other one...

    15. Re: 6 years by narcc · · Score: 1

      No. They need to port Android onto QNX.

      Something related happened. You can run a wide variety of Android apps on BB10 -- it even includes Amazon's app store.

      Step 3 (dream): Open Source QNX.

      It happened once. It was such a hopeful time...

    16. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you think Linux has achieved; Linux is about freedom, but on virtually every such mobile platform on which it's installed, it's nearly impossible for the user to exert any sort of meaningful control (at least without resorting to dubious guerrilla tactics).

      Linux, Windows, QNX, iOS.... WHO CARES?! The result is the same: A walled garden that is both badly designed and constructed, and there's nothing you can do about it, because you cannot afford the permits to fix it.

    17. Re:6 years by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Oh fuck off. QNX isn't even the most prevalent RTOS out there. It's an outdated OS that BB has utterly mismanaged, along with everything else.

      At this point, it is completely irrelevant what BB does. In fact, it's been completely irrelevant for half a decade now. The company was fucked five years ago, it was fucked four years ago, it was fucked three years ago, it was fucked two years ago, it was fucked last year, it's fucked this year, it will be fucked next year, and probably in the next year or two will transform itself into a patent troll.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    18. Re:6 years by strstr · · Score: 0

      The real reason android sucks is the apps chew up 10x more cpu cycles to run with the shitty ass java backed system they use. The result is the os, apps, and experience is worse and slower than on competing systems like iOS or even Windows.

      Google makes bad design choices and the OS needs to be scrapped and redone.

      The reason why Android is good, is the apps and linux underneath it.

      Alternatives? I don't consider iOS an alternative because its closed app market place with restrictions on software design forced down developers throats which amounts to censorship and crippling of apps. Windows 10 Mobile is looking interesting, so is the prospect of full blown Windows 10 Pro phones. :)

      I already liked MS software from the days of owning a zune which is where all the ideas for metro and windows phone came from. The reason I will switch is for the speed improvements, more responsive apps, and hopefully more power user apps. What I will likely give up initially is app support .. which is why I haven't been able to switch yet. Will reevaluate once Windows 10 makes it onto more mobile devices..

      obamasweapon.com

    19. Re: 6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An RTOS makes smooth animations easy, supports glitch free audio and perfect video, and can support cheaper hardware.

      For example, the rPI had to use the ARM FIQ, somewhat outside the Linux kernel system, to try and meet latency requirements of that chip's USB cheapo controller. That chip was probably designed for an RTOS on the ARM, or a dedicated service loop - not Linux with crazy unbounded latencies all over the place.

    20. Re:6 years by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, Android and iOS were well-behind BB for years in terms of features, with few exceptions.

      Yeah right... I should have specified features people care about. Not "features" such as requiring a Blackberry phone in order to be able to receive emails on a blackberry tablet.
      I've never head anyone in the past 6 years tell me "I wish that Android/iOS had feature X just like Blackberry".

      Which is odd, as developing for BB has always been easier than developing for Android.

      Maybe it is. Maybe it isn't. You surely are no authority in the mater. But the fact remains, there are almost no developers on Blackberry and this is what matters.

    21. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the sort of up-your-self thinking that causes these companies to crash. The reality is they totally missed what was going on in the smartphone market, even for years after Apple had shown everyone what their vision was. If you are that late to the party, then, like Nokia/MS, believing you'll just be able to waltz in with your own platform and carve out a segment is pure hubris.

      Android could have been a lifesaver for Nokia and BB. There is plenty of need for a decent handset manufacturer to get in there and put some real effort into the UI, legacy support, and implementing new hardware features in a way that works well (which Apple is good at). If any of the big players had done that they could easily be beating Samsung and eating into Apple's share right now.

    22. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know how secure it is?

      Please list known security issues with the platform.

      Boom.

    23. Re: 6 years by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      Linux is already an RTOS, and properly configured has absolutely no problem supporting glitch free audio and video sans frame drops. That being said, it is soft realtime rather than hard realtime. You wouldn't want a hard realtime system for an Android device,as there is not an infinute amount of RAM and CPU, and it would be too easy to lock out functionality by overtaxing the scheduler.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    24. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think it is too late? Late for poseurs and wannabees. Too late for them.

      I have been surrounded by iphoneatics and people with bigger and larger tablets you need two pairs of cargo pants to wear them, the second one for your brain in case it ever needs to multitask. Sure it'll fit, if you don't drop it on the floor.

      You'll be like the rest of the phoneatics, mesmerized by the glow, which you will need since it's too dark where the sun don't shine. And guess where your head is at.

      So please BB, make a phone for the rest of us that aren't thrown by the shiny shiny or the price. Or the long lines. Because WE know who Big Brother really is. He's up there in the icloud.

      Go ahead and buy the new model, with the gorilla glass and chinese-made parts. But don't forget to sign up and have an account. You know resistance is futile. But not smexi.

    25. Re:6 years by c · · Score: 1

      I disagree, I think it's a very smart idea.

      Depends on whether they approach it from a software or a hardware angle.

      It they go software and heavily skin Android to give a BB-like experience... not such a good move. If people wanted a BB skin with Android apps, BB wouldn't be in the situation they're in.

      If they approach it from a hardware angle, they could do very well, especially with the keyboard phones. But if they do well then they do risk the knock-off manufacturers trying to undercut them.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    26. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm sorry, but Android and security don't exactly go hand in hand.

    27. Re:6 years by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      . They've lost because people want to use what is popular (and has apps), and Android and iOS are it.

      That is NOT why they lost. They lost because BlackBerry Server was stupid expensive, and each unit licensing was even more expensive.

      They could have killed everyone by giving the server away, and charging for "enhanced" features that a few people might have wanted. But they didn't and that is the end of that story.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    28. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be such a "Priv"

    29. Re: 6 years by adolf · · Score: 1

      I suppose then that it should be easy to fix the Android audio latency problem.

      But it's still not fixed.

    30. Re: 6 years by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      A SlashID as low as yours, and you haven't yet figured out that nothing is easy?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    31. Re:6 years by Prune · · Score: 1

      Google Play Services. This is not open source, but it is needed to run many of the apps. (this is also why I can't run some of the Android apps on my BB Z10)

      I can't tell if you're trolling, but you can run Google Play Services on BlackBerry (I'm running them on my Passport, for example, along with dependent apps like Snapchat, or even the Google Play Store). Regularly updated patched versions of the Google services are in the top post at http://forums.crackberry.com/a...

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    32. Re: 6 years by Prune · · Score: 1

      Now that you can even run Google Play Services on BB10, the only Android apps that don't work are ones that use native code.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    33. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no known issues because no one uses it.

      Boom.

    34. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary, Android and iOS were well-behind BB for years in terms of features, with few exceptions.

      And that exhaustive list you provided was quite convincing. Oh wait...

    35. Re: 6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also have a Z10 phone. Love it. Everything just works like it should. The "hub" is great. Travel integration just works. Android apps run ok, and can be downloaded through amazon app store or sideloaded - though I have not had need to do that.
      Multitasking really works. Stream pandora, use web browser, no hiccups.
      Everything works really well.

    36. Re: 6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, BB still sells into govt in a big way. Very secure platform.

    37. Re: 6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All things that 99.9% of consumers could care less about (yes, *could care less* is used purposefully).

    38. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Their own OS, QNX, is superior in just about every way imaginable, including development tools.

      If you really think that then you're an ignorant idiot that has no idea what they're talking about. And the best part is that you probably said that with a straight face. You could at least Googled it so you wouldn't look like a fool.

    39. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking idiot.

    40. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a stupid idea then, and it's a stupid idea now. "Hey, let's toss out every advantage we have and become another me-too player in a crowded market!"

      Android hasn't exactly been a path to success for anyone but Samsung. Their own OS, QNX, is superior in just about every way imaginable, including development tools.

      The board should have fired Chen just for suggesting they do something this foolish.

      For those that don't know, the Blackberry development suite consists of Eclipse and Cascades (a version of QT that's so old that it's not even supported anymore) So you're either:

      1) Lying
      2) Ignorant
      3) Completely fucking stupid
      4) All of the above

    41. Re:6 years by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      How do you know how secure it is?

      Please list known security issues with the platform.

      Boom.

      Any platform is only as secure as it's known to be, and that security opinion varies on who is making it.
        - End user knowledge of security flaws.
        - Manufacturer/Developer knowledge of security flaws.
        - Cyber-criminal knowledge of security flaws.

      If you're an end user, you don't know that Blackberry is publicly listing all known flaws. There are likely a bunch more that are not disclosed for security reasons until they can be patched. So asking someone to produce a list of flaws, and calling the absence of a list of issues proof of the platform's security is fucking bullshit.

      If you're the company responsible for the OS, you're not going to know about all security flaws that may be getting exploited. You have the ones you find in testing, ones reported by end users and White Hats, and maybe you have a mole or other "ear to the streets" with info on what's being exploited.

      If you're the hacker, how do you know all the flaws you're aware of and the perceived "level of difficulty" are true? There can be flaws that are undiscovered or only known and exploited by certain individuals or teams that would make your malicious activities much easier if you were in the know, too.

    42. Re: 6 years by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Not big enough apparently, or else they wouldn't be headed for bankruptcy.

    43. Re: 6 years by adolf · · Score: 1

      I was doing low-latency audio on Linux with machines barely a tenth as powerful as my quad-core Android pocket computer over a dozen years ago.

      It's a solved problem. Except, somehow, it's not.

      The mind boggles.

      Or maybe Android is just inherently fucked: A proof-of-concept that should never have gone mainstream, but which instead should have been studied and learned from as a laboratory curiosity. (Like Plan 9, for example.)

      I just bought my lady-friend a new Nokia 635 phone that runs some manner of Windows. It's smooth like butter compared to my Samsung Galaxy S5.

      The Nokia was $40, shipped, and has no contract.

      My S5 was $750, off-contract, in June of this year.

      And maybe -- just maybe -- the little Nokia is able to be so cheap and smooth because it runs native binaries, instead of a hacktastic JVM clone which should produce native machine code that works just as well as a real optimizing C compiler, but just never seems to be able to actually accomplish that.

      Brb, my S5 is sluggish. Maybe I should run fstrim on it again because Android still hasn't gotten that part right -- even though it was allegedly fixed a long time ago in 4.3.

      I've been on /. long enough to realize that nothing is easy, especially when neglects to learn from the past. And I've been using Android long enough to realize that Java still sucks for user-interactive tasks, just as it has for about the past twenty fucking years.

      I remember when I had a first-gen iPod Touch when it was still a hot ticket (got it "free" from Netgear as a rebate for a switch I bought at work). A few months or a year later, VZW begins their DROID push, and not long after that I got myself an OG Motorola Droid. The Droid had clearly superior basic hardware: 4x the RAM, a better CPU, a better GPU. It was a flagship device for both Motorola and Google as it was the first to run Android 2.0.

      And Google's own gilded 3D app, Google Earth, was vastly smoother and more responsive on the plainly-inferior and physically smaller iPod.

      There's no excusing this shit, unless the excuse is "because Linux and userland JVM instead of native binaries on FreeBSD-based Darwin," and that's just more evidence that Android is an experiment that should never have left the lab.

      Yeah, nothing is easy. I get it.

    44. Re:6 years by davester666 · · Score: 1

      First, QNX isn't BlackBerry OS
      Second, the tools for QNX are not what you use to create apps for BBOS.
      Third, effectively, nobody is making apps for BBOS. Wouldn't surprise me if there are more apps for it using the Android shim layer than there are native BBOS apps.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    45. Re: 6 years by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "I was doing low-latency audio on Linux with machines barely a tenth as powerful as my quad-core Android pocket computer over a dozen years ago."

      So you agree with me then. The problem isn't with Linux.

      "Or maybe Android is just inherently fucked: A proof-of-concept that should never have gone mainstream, but which instead should have been studied and learned from as a laboratory curiosity. (Like Plan 9, for example.)"

      That is throwing the baby out with the bathwater, and the mother too! I had to Google to see what this "problem" even was. I was a pre-order customer for the initial Android phone, the T-Mobile G1. I've had tens of phones over the years. I have never had any real issues with any of them. Googling suggests that the "big issue" is that some games aren't available for Android. Obviously, you also wouldn't want to use it as an effects processor on stage if you are a musician like myself. Well, no shit. Android is awesome as far as I'm concerned. "Smooth as butter" as you say on my $40.00 Moto e. Bringing up the Galaxy cost is so far off the reservation it isn't funny. That is hardware cost, not software cost. It does however bring up a point. When you target hardware you control, such as Apple, or have the OS developers working closely with you for monetary gain, ala Nokia you are going to have it much easier. Android runs on hundreds if not thousands of platforms. In that case, your mileage is going to vary widely.

      I'm glad we agree nothing is easy. The best way to deal with the complexity is to focus on issues that matter. Getting games on Android is a non-issue. There's a Nintendo for that :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    46. Re:6 years by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe not. I finally gave up and bought a phone without a physical keyboard and I HATE it. Everyone tells me I'll get used to it, but that never seems to happen.

      You don't even like not picking your finger up between letters mode? Whatever that's called. That's the one thing that's finally got me over the physical keyboard. Just swipe words. It's actually faster, once you get good at it. One day we'll have touch screens that form raised areas and then you'll be able to have both in one thing, it'll be glorious.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    47. Re:6 years by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      > Please list known security issues with the platform.

      Using your logic, this means my C-64 is the most secure platform of all.

    48. Re:6 years by I+will+be+back · · Score: 1

      No hacks available.
      BTW, it wasn't taken on any Pwn2own

    49. Re:6 years by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      They didn't hack Firefox OS, Meego, Tizen and Bada either I guess. Nobody care about OS nobody uses.

    50. Re:6 years by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Upgrade to the Passport, i get 3 to 4 days charge and the keyboard is great.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    51. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the OS has passed multiple validation tests required to work in regulated industries and government such as the defense industry. Other mobiles have as well, but more lately, and not for as long or many as BB10.

      This won't settle the dispute as to who is most secure, but at least Blackberry puts their phones to the test, well over earlier iPhones and generic late model Androids, or untested Firefox OS.

    52. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And iOS? 4000+ malware apps discovered in the App Store and countless security issues cropping up - the latest being 2 lock screen bypasses.

    53. Re: 6 years by adolf · · Score: 1

      But you do realize that there are people using iPads and iPhones and (gasp) iPod Touch devices in professional music, don't you? Even live, on-stage.

      So, no, it's not obvious that you wouldn't use a handheld computer ("phone") on stage. But nobody does that with Android devices because the audio latency is shit.

    54. Re: 6 years by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "But you do realize that there are people using iPads and iPhones and (gasp) iPod Touch devices in professional music, don't you? Even live, on-stage."

      I realize that lots of people aren't very smart, yes. The word professional doesn't mean what most people think it means; as you are likely aware it really just means they are getting paid. Competent musicians are not using them. There are plenty of incompetent professionals. There is an old and very wise saying: "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should". In any case, you can lament all you want over the "big" issue. The 99% of the world that doesn't care if they can play games or aren't pretending to be competent musicians will go on just fine with Android as it is now. If they make it better, great. If they don't? meh.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    55. Re:6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the problem: Android isn't 100% open source (at least the way I understand it). ... So they cannot have a secure device like a BB10 device.

      Why not? Perhaps they could run Android in a virtual machine or something of that nature for its apps, but use their own native BB programs for providing email or whatever else needs to be secure. For the minimal native BB apps needed, maintenance needn't be as expensive as for maintaining a general-purpose system, though it would still cost somewhat more. Of course, that's not what's being suggested, but it still seems like it's possible to do.

  2. No word on if it has a removable battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Day one purchase if it does.

    1. Re:No word on if it has a removable battery by acoustix · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately BB is moving away from removable batteries. I believe the Z30, Classic and Passport all have non-removable batteries.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    2. Re:No word on if it has a removable battery by bob_super · · Score: 1

      I need removable battery less than I need a physical keyboard.
      Can't wait...

  3. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does Blackberry even still exist?

    1. Re:Why? by dejitaru · · Score: 1

      Because the corporation has not been dissolved?

    2. Re:Why? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Because you don't want one; which explains a lot.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  4. What Happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened to Blackberry that caused them to go from technology pioneer and market leader to being so clueless and completely blind to the market that it took them literally years to realize that the world had left them behind?

    I can understand year one. Year two is hard to understand. Year three? Year four? WTF? Year five? Are you fucking kidding me?

    How can you double down on ignorance five times over?

    1. Re:What Happened? by narcc · · Score: 0

      Because everyone with even a tiny bit of technical knowledge knows that Android is a terrible platform. It sucks for users and sucks for developers. Had there been any other "free" alternative, you'd likely have never heard of it.

      They have a vastly superior platform. Why toss that out for third-rate garbage?

    2. Re:What Happened? by Notorious+G · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It basically boils down to arrogance. I was a IT consultant and went on site to Blackberry offices in the 2008-ish time frame. They were building new office space like a dot-com era venture funded business on crack and insisted it was all going up from there.The iPhone had come out and was eating the market alive and BB execs I talked to considered it little more than a fad device for consumers that would never penetrate the business market. R&D pretty much stagnated as they decided the BB was so damn good it pretty much could not be improved. But what really did them in was apps. Ever try to write a BB app? It was frigging impossible to get it done. The API was poorly documented and often just flat out wrong. There was the public API and a API the internal BB developers used that legend has was much better. I don't know how much I really believe that but I can tell you for sure BB development sucked. Apple had it right, make app development easy and well documented. As far as I know, BB still has not learned this lesson.

    3. Re:What Happened? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      What happened to Blackberry that caused them to go from technology pioneer and market leader to being so clueless and completely blind to the market that it took them literally years to realize that the world had left them behind?

      The market changed from a B2B market to a B2C market. Blackberry was very good at marketing to businesses, but had no idea how to market to consumers.
      When the iPhone came out, Blackberry sales initially increased, but eventually even business people favored the consumer devices.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:What Happened? by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They have a vastly superior platform. Why toss that out for third-rate garbage?

      Well, it's pretty simple really:

      Android = profitable (at least for Samsung, they're making a killing)
      Blackberry/QNX = unprofitable

      It doesn't matter how "superior" your product is if you can't get anyone to buy it and you can't make enough money to keep the company going.

      It seems to me they (and you) have made the classic mistake of thinking "superiority" will cause a product line to dominate the market, when in fact it's bang-for-buck which does. It doesn't matter how great your product is; if it costs too much and there's a much-cheaper alternative that seems almost as good, people are going to flock to that. That's exactly what happened with Android. Apple/iOS was there first, but it cost a small fortune (remember how much the first iPhones cost?). Then Android phones came out, they looked much like iPhones but were a lot cheaper (and also didn't have a my-way-or-the-highway bent like Apple devices), so now Androids utterly dominate the market, even if they aren't the most profitable. Then there's BB, which mainly just catered to government and big corporations because of the secure email tie-in, and they've been passed up by cheaper and more functional (in most ways) devices that have the whole app-store advantage.

    5. Re:What Happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same thing happen to IBM with OS 2. They banked on the expectation that their OS was superior to Microsoft Windows, but Windows had more applications, and ran one clone PC.

    6. Re:What Happened? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Ever try to write a BB app? It was frigging impossible to get it done.

      I have. From OS5 through 10. Even OS5 development was easier than Android.

      As far as I know, BB still has not learned this lesson.

      As of OS10, things are dramatically better. Android development, however, still sucks. I don't think it was the tools.

    7. Re:What Happened? by jammz · · Score: 2

      Android isn't actually profitable. At least, if you're talking about the smartphone segment, Apple takes 93% of all profits. Samsung only takes roughly 9%. Do you know why those numbers don't add up to 100%? Simple: other smartphone vendors make nothing or lose money on their devices.

      The critical and classic mistake so many Android fanboys make: they think market share matters. Business is about money and profit. Right now, virtually the entire smartphone business worldwide, belongs to Apple because they earn the overwhelming majority of the profit.

      Source: http://bgr.com/2015/02/09/appl...

    8. Re:What Happened? by Scoth · · Score: 1

      There are several articles out there that detail the rise and fall of RIM/Blackberry. The basic idea is that Mike Lazaridis and other executives refused to allow the devices to develop beyond excellent email machines with nice keyboards, and completely missed the boat on the kind of developments that people came to expect of not just smartphones, but cell phones in general. Cameras, music players, larger screens, even good web browsers. They also completely missed the BYOD culture - if a person is buying one device for both personal and company use, they aren't going to buy the corporate-focused one that isn't much fun. They're going to buy the Android or iPhone or something with good app support that also happens to talk to Exchange.

      By the time they started grudglingly adding some of these features, it was already angling towards too late. By then iPhone and Android (and Windows Phone) were offering near-desktop-levels of web browsing support, decent cameras, every kind of music and video playing you could want, while the Blackberry devices hadn't really changed all that much.

      Meanwhile they were at least making enough money on paper with existing contracts to at least stay afloat, which really just led to more head-in-sanding.

    9. Re:What Happened? by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Has the price of iPhones changed...?

    10. Re:What Happened? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about profit on apps, or profit on the phones themselves? It's pretty well-known that Apple makes a lot more money in its app store than the Android app store brings in. But that's irrelevant to the phone makers, who don't get any money from that.

      I've heard this thing about other Android phone vendors losing money on their devices before. The problem with this is: why would they continue making and selling phones if they're losing money on them? Either they're making money on them somewhere else, or there's something wrong with those numbers, or they all really think their fortunes are going to turn around any day now and they'll be as successful as Samsung (yeah right). Something's wrong here. As you said, business is about money and profit: companies rarely continue to sell stuff at a loss; they might do it for a bit to try to build marketshare and reputation, but for only so long (unless they're making money somewhere else, like the razor-and-blades business model where you sell consumables for inflated prices to more than make up for the "loss leader"). One Android phone maker selling at a loss trying to build their presence in the market is believable; all of them (except Samsung) selling at a loss is not.

    11. Re:What Happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever try to write a BB app? It was frigging impossible to get it done.

      I have. From OS5 through 10. Even OS5 development was easier than Android.

      As far as I know, BB still has not learned this lesson.

      As of OS10, things are dramatically better. Android development, however, still sucks. I don't think it was the tools.

      Lies. BB development is based on J2ME and is absolutely horrid. It doesn't even provide an API for parsing dates. It's like being in '95.

  5. BlackBerry security by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

    *Offer not valid where prohibited by law*

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  6. How sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The maker of the most secure mobile OS is forced to sell a phone using the least secure mobile OS in order to stay relevant.

    1. Re:How sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they stuck to their guns and not backdoored their own services, I'd have a better view of them as a company. The best review of a smart phone that I've seen is the police stating that they are having a hard time unlocking iPhones and are asking Apple to assist them, without much to show for it.

      The right to privacy is important. I don't have anything of value in my car, but I still lock the doors. I don't expect others to get into it without showing that they did. The same with the home, rooms, and computers or mail.

    2. Re:How sad... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Android is only as secure as the phone maker allows. If they keep up with patches and push these out to customers' devices promptly, Android can be quite secure. If they don't bother making any updates after the phone ships (sadly the case with some makers; HTC, I'm looking at you, you fuckers), then of course it's as secure as a sieve. That's the "problem" with Android: it's in the hands of the phone makers, and some do a much better job than others. It's not like the old days with Microsoft, where the OS vendor was the one responsible for this stuff. The vendors have all the source to the OS, and they have total control over what goes into the OS build, and when updates are issued.

      So if Blackberry's Android devices are insecure, it's their own fault for doing a shitty job. If they can handle owning and maintaining their own OS (QNX), surely they can devote sufficient resources to staying up-to-date with Android patches.

  7. 1% of a huge number is still pretty large by pz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The closing sentence in the summary suggests that the BlackBerry 10 is a losing proposition because it represents less than 1% of the market.

    The mobile phone market is so enormously vast that 1% of it would still be quite large, thankyouverymuch. Nearly everyone in the US has a phone. Let's use round numbers: say we have 300,000,000 phones in the US. 1% of that would be 3,000,000 phones. Each phone has an expected replacement cycle of 3 years, so the sales should be about 1,000,000 units per year.

    Please show me a single manufacturer that would not be jumping out of their pants to move a million units a year. Heck, there probably aren't that many manufacturers that COULD deliver at that level.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:1% of a huge number is still pretty large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 million units a year is about 50million in profit because the margins are about $50 per handset. Hardly enough to pay the staff when you are losing billions every year.

    2. Re:1% of a huge number is still pretty large by danbob999 · · Score: 4, Informative

      They don't have 1%. They have about one third of it. They have 0.37% of smartphones, or 0.27% of phones sold in 1H2015.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      If they could still keep this market share they could be fine. But they are loosing both market share and absolute sales every quarter. Mostly because they still have contracts with some slow-moving corporations, all of which are looking to switch.
      Their other problem is that it can be worth it to develop phones for only 0.3% of the market, but it's not worth it to develop and support an OS for them. Switching to Android could make sense. Only, it's too late.

    3. Re:1% of a huge number is still pretty large by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You have a good point here, but on the other hand, TFS itself said that Blackberry is "struggling". There's lots of companies that sell much less than 1M units a year which aren't "struggling", they make enough profit for the size of their company. It sounds like 1M units a year simply isn't enough for BB to stay profitable. If they're so large they have their own OS team (QNX) and R&D teams, that might not be enough volume for them to stay profitable. Worse, if their marketshare (and absolute unit sales) are trending down instead of up (or at least steady), due to everyone moving to Androids, then that doesn't bode well for them.

    4. Re:1% of a huge number is still pretty large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > they are loosing both market share and absolute sales

      What do you mean by market share and absolute sales that aren't tight? I've never heard it put that way before.

    5. Re: 1% of a huge number is still pretty large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BlackBerry has tight control over their hardware and ecosystem, so I think he is just trolling.

    6. Re:1% of a huge number is still pretty large by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      They are way, way, way late switching to Android... that ship has sailed and it is just a flailing carcass waiting to die...

    7. Re:1% of a huge number is still pretty large by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      On every quarter, they have less sales than the quarter before. Their market share is decreasing even faster.

    8. Re: 1% of a huge number is still pretty large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be lost market share. He said it was loose. I have an MBA and have never heard that term before.

    9. Re:1% of a huge number is still pretty large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      they aren't losing money. they are turning a profit.

    10. Re:1% of a huge number is still pretty large by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      They used to own essentially the whole market. They now have 0.5% marketshare. Their revenue has been in freefall since 2011, and quarters with profits have been few and far between. If that's not struggling, I don't know what is.

      That said, it looks like their revenue and marketshare is starting to stabilize, and they may be able to keep going as a boutique Android vendor. But they're essentially irrelevant to the market, with no influence on it. That's not really success, that's just life support.

    11. Re: 1% of a huge number is still pretty large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I think you're a cunt.

    12. Re:1% of a huge number is still pretty large by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      They sold off lots of assets. They created a positive cash flow, which is not the same thing as turning a profit. They will almost certainly lose money next year.

      Chen has been playing a smoke and mirrors game, but already in the last few weeks dropped the biggest hint, that BB is somehow going to use its patent portfolio, and we all know what that means.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    13. Re:1% of a huge number is still pretty large by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      don't worry, stick to your whatever-gadget.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    14. Re:1% of a huge number is still pretty large by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      that's just life support is okay with us. We won't be chasing those figures that seem all-too-important to bean counters and Wall Street. Go ahead and say, Too late the hero You probably use a gadget that does the job. And we'll be fine too...over here.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    15. Re: 1% of a huge number is still pretty large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIM employee much?

  8. And the wind cries Mary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the reason? Is this surrender? White flag? To what is BB surrendering? What's left? Apple? Will it go Android? Should it? Could it? Call in and let us know.

  9. Stylish hardware by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    Blackberry makes some stylish hardware, so it could be a good move.
    Move into a new market, while not leaving your old market.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Stylish hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Porsche design is there as well. Here before you get dazzled from other people who know design: "Porsche design blackberry" paste those words in your images.google.com search. And "Honey I'm going out for a sec, need anything?" simply because you don't type your credit card info for anything

  10. Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Case in point, trying to service a buddy's Android 4.1 phone. It can't manage application permissions, it would need Android 4.3 or 4.4 for that (even if needing some rooted app) and it's stuck till end of Earth on 4.1. What a pile of garbage. The need is to run a chat/VoIP application, but they demand access to contacts i.e. uploading the phone directory to unknown third parties. (App still not installed). Fucking absolutely ridiculous.
    So even if Android Turd Sandwich, Android Fellatio or Android Mothership have mended their way, why trust them? A fork with built-in security might be better.

  11. Play Services by xombo · · Score: 1

    They would have been a lot smarter to have implemented Play Services or gotten their Android runtime Google Play certified so that it could run normal Google apps. That was really the main deciding factor for me to not get a Blackberry Passport---it simply won't run Google Play Services-dependent apps (though all other Android apps worked when sideloaded). Things that relied on Google Maps or any of the Google ID authentication failed to work, which is surprisingly a lot of apps. Simply improving their Android app runtime and getting that elusive Google Play store icon on their screen would have been a huge opportunity. So few BBRY users are even aware the Android runtime exists, so getting a direct Google Play store icon would be a huge a revelation to them.

    1. Re:Play Services by Prune · · Score: 1

      it simply won't run Google Play Services-dependent apps (though all other Android apps worked when sideloaded)

      Can't tell if you're trolling or just ignorant. Google Play Services and dependent apps run fine on BB10 (I'm running them on my Passport, along with the Google Play Store). Regularly updated downloads for the patched versions in the first post at http://forums.crackberry.com/a...

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    2. Re:Play Services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are a lot of blackberry owners that don't care about the android runtime. we prefer not to run android apps.

      if i wanted android, i would have bought an android.

      if i could delete the amazon app store and the runtime i would in a heartbeat.

    3. Re:Play Services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it simply won't run Google Play Services-dependent apps (though all other Android apps worked when sideloaded)

      Can't tell if you're trolling or just ignorant. Google Play Services and dependent apps run fine on BB10 (I'm running them on my Passport, along with the Google Play Store). Regularly updated downloads for the patched versions in the first post at http://forums.crackberry.com/a...

      You keep calling people ignorant or trolls on this point, when it is fairly obvious that they are asking for official out-of-the-box support, not something that requires a lot of patching with 3rd party APKs you need to trust. It's fine that you like your hacked version, but people should still be allowed to ask for official and verified support from Blackberry.

    4. Re:Play Services by xombo · · Score: 1

      It's true. I went through all the hoops trying to get Play Services to work properly with apps like Gmail and Google Maps on the Q10 and it just wouldn't work properly. Apps would constantly crash and I'd get errors that the Play Services Framework had stopped. It was ridiculous. I don't think it's asking too much to get the Play Store and all associated services working on their runtime, out of the box.

  12. Canadian Technology! by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    I still remember in the old days the CEO/founder guy would hold up a new Blackberry model to the audience and yell,

    "Canadian Technology!"

    and the crowd would cheer.

  13. Should have done this from the get-go by DrXym · · Score: 1
    Blackberry should have gone with Android from the get go. They could have produced a security hardened version of Android where personal apps and business apps resided in separate personas protected from each other. This was a strong and compelling option for companies that wanted BYOD but without the risk. They could have thrown in their software stack too and their own front end and would have made a lot of money.

    Now they're belatedly bringing out devices that run Android but it's basically just Samsung and KNOX under the covers. It's probably too little too late. I wouldn't be surprised if Samsung buy Blackberry outright and use the brand to sell a bunch of security hardened phones.

  14. Blackberry lies by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    I recall, prior to the launch of BB10, a spokeman doing a presentation on a stage in Toronto.

    "We're being careful, we're not going to screw this up, we're not going to promise anything we don't deliver and deliver on schedule. We know if we do, we're done."

    Then they cancelled BB10 for the Playbook, broke the BlackBerry Bridge, failed to make the Blackberry server component more administrator-friendly, and modified their phone interface to make it less useful than it could have been.

    They lied, and they have no credibility as a result.

  15. Well they have to do something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your going to stay alive in the market you have to be willing to accept what is working and change. Obviously they can't run IOS, they can't run some security riddled China OS and they surely won't run Windows Mobile which is circling the drain itself. If they can make Android fit with security which is sort of a questionable fit. They may find a niche to stay in business. Although its very much a if at this point and my question is. Who are they going to market this phone too?

  16. Re:Not "great" by dejitaru · · Score: 0

    But does trump use an Android or a Blackberry? THAT'S the real question

  17. Physical Keyboard by dejitaru · · Score: 1

    Regardless of what people think of blackberry, I think that this method might help them. Android is a very popular (as in 89% of the world market popular), and the fact that they are giving you an android with a slide-out blackberry keyboard allows them to enter into a niche market for people who want a real qwerty keyboard. Practically every other smartphone developer has dropped their physical keyboards a few years back. I know because I tried looking for one for one of my family members as a christmas present a couple years ago, but couldn't do it because I would have to buy a 3 year old device.

    1. Re:Physical Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I had mod points. Android is fantastic but there's gotta be a market for those of us that still want phones with keyboards. It's a good move, and it might pay off for them if they do it right.

  18. In an attempt? Look again by Provocateur · · Score: 0

    (Had to repost. For some silly stupid reason the new slashdot logs you in, but posts your comments as ac. stupid untested beta creeps)

    You think it is too late? Late for poseurs and wannabees. Too late for them.

    I have been surrounded by iphoneatics and people with bigger and larger tablets you need two pairs of cargo pants to wear them, the second one for your brain in case it ever needs to multitask. Sure it'll fit, if you don't drop it on the floor.

    You'll be like the rest of the phoneatics, mesmerized by the glow, which you will need since it's too dark where the sun don't shine. And guess where your head is at.

    So please BB, make a phone for the rest of us that aren't thrown by the shiny shiny or the price. Or the long lines. Because WE know who Big Brother really is. He's up there in the icloud.

    Go ahead and buy the new model, with the gorilla glass and chinese-made parts. But don't forget to sign up and have an account. You know resistance is futile. But not smexi.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  19. In other words security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies don't get security.You can't build a secure phone. Period. You might be able to design a more secure and privacy friendly messaging device, but it's a hard problem to solve. Android is hardly a "secure" or securable platform and the phone tech that one has to built off is deliberately insecure. Cellular tech is designed such that any cellular device informs the towers where one is at all the time. It needs this information to communicate. It can't send large amounts of data (ie voice communications) to every device in a given region.

    The only way to thwart this would be a paging-only receiver chip. The actual modem chip used for two way communications would need to be separate and it would be critical that power got cut to this chip whenever not in use. They'd still know where you were when you were making or receiving calls. Sending and receiving messages could be a little more complicated if not used with voice to reduce the level of tracking possible. For example you could send a message and that message could be queued for later delivery at a time and place which is specified thus eliminating an adversaries ability to know when your away from your office or house short of your consent anyway to 'send now' (and reveal your location) or 'send later at a more privacy convenient time'.

    I always think the blackphone and similar efforts are little more than fraudulent or at least taking advantage of unsuspecting users. They're not releasing full code and they are building off platforms which can't be secured (both hardware and software).

  20. So What Happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever try to write a BB app? It was frigging impossible to get it done.

    I have. From OS5 through 10. Even OS5 development was easier than Android.

    As far as I know, BB still has not learned this lesson.

    As of OS10, things are dramatically better. Android development, however, still sucks. I don't think it was the tools.

    So, what happened? Superior technology. Easier to write apps, you say. Yet iPhone but a boot across Blackberry's throat and Android rolled over them both like a column of Sherman tanks!

    Why didn't app makers flock to Blackberry?
    Why did Blackberry refuse to offer an alternative with a bigger screen and touch?
    Why, in your opinion did Blackberry allow themselve's to have their hats handed to them, despite their supposed superior platform?

    Six years too late and SOOO many dollars short, they decide to try to engage with an Android phone in a market absolutely flooded with CHEAP as dirt Android phones.

  21. No by GrahamJ · · Score: 1

    They didn't launch it. Nice clickbait.

  22. I like my Q10 by thogard · · Score: 2

    I bought a Q10 a few months ago after years of trying and then abandoning other smart phones. I managed to use it without signing up for any accounts for several weeks. I can run android apps on it without rooting the thing. You can port QT apps to it with ease.

    My phone uses MY servers for its data not someone one elses. That data link is fully encrypted and under my control.

    BB apps make more money for most app developers than iphone and android apps.

    The main problem with the thing is they managed to screw up the "screen lock/power" button so the thing turns off in my pocket. The thing has 39 buttons so they should drop pressing the top button to power off and require something like the top button and hold down "P" to power down and top button and "U" to unlock. I don't know how they could screw up something that has been well know for so long.

    1. Re:I like my Q10 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My phone uses MY servers for its data not someone one elses. That data link is fully encrypted and under my control.

      You do realize that AOSP includes a non-google-play email client (called "Email") which speaks standard protocols and doesn't call home to tell Google what you're up to, right? An Android phone without google play services is still useful. Android also includes IPSEC support, but of course you can use encrypted protocols for email without configuring that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:I like my Q10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have NEVER shut down my Q10 by mistake. How the fuck are you pushing the top button for 3 seconds by mistake??? I think it's a YOU problem.

  23. this will not end well.... by smash · · Score: 1

    ... there are 2 ways you can compete in the marketplace - value (i.e., offering something that is worth buying because it offers something you can't get elsewhere) and price. Unless Blackberry are going to offer something useful that other Android OEMs can not offer, they're going to have to compete on PRICE. When they're broke, against the manufacturing might of all the cheap android OEMs in China.

    2c. They're toast.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  24. Um... doesn't Blackberry by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    have replacements handy for anything that matters? The browser is Open Source. The messaging apps are what make blackberry blackberry, so they could give a *bleep* about losing those. I suppose there's google maps. But google makes that available because the positional data is too valuable to give up. I guess you'll lose that awesome mid-90s style music player.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  25. About damn time by robbiedo · · Score: 1

    I just want a Blackberry Classic running Android and MobileIron for 8-12 hours a day. Is that too much to ask?

  26. No wonder... by DirtyAmish · · Score: 1

    I just noticed/read that Blackberry is Canadian. That explains a lot. :-)

  27. blackberry..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol...

  28. Every keyboard user will want one. by Fencepost · · Score: 1

    My wife finally gave in and is using a touchscreen-only model now, but only because there were no viable choices with keyboards and even now she still uses a stylus for most things including text input. It makes me nuts but I'm not going to successfully smack the stylus out of her hand any more than you could smack the cigarette out of the mouth of a smoker.

    If Blackberry brings this out with 5.1 Lollipop or even manage to get Marshmallow on there, it will be the ONLY current keyboarded Android phone from a major vendor, the only available keyboarded phone with a screen over 4", one of two phones with a screen higher than VGA's 640x480 (the other is an LG from 2013 with 800x480 and Android 4.1.2). It may be a niche market, but if the phone as released doesn't outright suck it will be a niche market that Blackberry will own. If it's unlockable and can get updates in the future that'll just cement its potential for success even if BB doesn't do well with the OS.

    IIRC, I saw some discussion that a leaked preview pic had a T-Mobile branded app icon which indicates that it's going to be GSM/LTE and likely will work just about anywhere in the world.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion