Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Make Windows Update Install Only Security Updates Automatically?

An anonymous reader writes: After the news earlier this month about Microsoft forcing the Windows 10 upgrade on people who don't want it, my sizeable extended family has been coming to me for a solution. They don't want to be guinea pigs this early in the Windows 10 release cycle, but it looks like Microsoft may not be giving them a choice. My reading of Woody Leonhard's advice is that the only way to ensure the upgrade doesn't happen is to disable Windows Update, but that seems extreme. I want my family to install security updates, but I don't relish the idea of explaining to them how to install just those and hide the less-desireable updates.

The ideal solution would be to have only security updates install automatically, but it looks like it's easier said than done. I've looked at third-party tools like Autopatcher and Portable Update, but a security-only option doesn't seem to be very standard. From what I've read, Microsoft doesn't even package security updates separately, sometimes mixing merely Important and Recommended updates in the downloaded CAB file. I wish I could get them off Windows, but it's not an option. They use Windows at work or school, and don't want to go through the process of learning another OS. Maybe the current situation with Windows 10 will convince them eventually, but they need something now. I would really like to come up with a solution before the next Patch Tuesday on October 13. Do any of the more knowledgeable Slashdotters out there have any advice?

288 comments

  1. Fail idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If any number of people did this, then Microsoft would just push a "security" update that offered you Windows 10 or installed spying on the basis that they could somehow offer you more security. "KB6666666 - improve security by making windows phone home at every opportunity"

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Fail idea by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2

      Isnt this what they did for the notification anyway?

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:Fail idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Isnt this what they did for the notification anyway?

      I don't remember, because I have long had a habit of just installing all the updates. The only reason I didn't have them set to install automagically is that I didn't want them downloading when I was trying to use my connection. Now, of course, I read the descriptions.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re: Fail idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Now, of course, I read the descriptions.

      Don't worry, Microsoft has a solution for that: with Windows 10, they simply don't offer descriptions. They've also started bundling feature updates and security updates into single patches. Probably. From what people have been able to determine that existing patches do.

      There's no reason they can't decide to start doing that for all updates. Will KB414140 force you to install Windows 10? Include telemetry? Fix a zero-day exploit that's being actively exploited? All of the above? Who knows!

    4. Re:Fail idea by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's time to start asking the question about "security" updates - is it for you or for Microsoft they improve the security?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:Fail idea by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      It's time to start asking the question about "security" updates - is it for you or for Microsoft they improve the security?

      That is like asking if a Prisons "security" updates is for the benefit of the inmates.

    6. Re: Fail idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There's no reason they can't decide to start doing that for all updates.

      There might be. For instance. Microsoft might have contractual obligations to release those patch descriptions publicly for Windows 7. They've kept whole operating systems going past EoL to handle government contracts before.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re: Fail idea by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      There's no reason they can't decide to start doing that for all updates.

      There might be. For instance. Microsoft might have contractual obligations to release those patch descriptions publicly for Windows 7. They've kept whole operating systems going past EoL to handle government contracts before.

      As far as I know, the US Navy is still paying $9,000,000 a year for XP support, but that is set to end in June of 2017.
      XP Point of Sale systems support also ends in 2017.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    8. Re: Fail idea by FeriteCore · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They already do this by offering totally meaningless descriptions. Reading descriptions does no good when they contain no actual information.

    9. Re:Fail idea by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      Isnt this what they did for the notification anyway?

      Almost but it wasn't a security patch.

    10. Re: Fail idea by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Most of the descriptions I have bothered looking at have language in it describing the type of security blunder- i.e execute code remotely- and a link to a more thorough explanation.

      Did this change with windows 10?

    11. Re: Fail idea by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    12. Re: Fail idea by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Why would a contract to provide extended service (no doubt for a hefty fee) to party Y oblige you to provide it to party Z?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re: Fail idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why would a contract to provide extended service (no doubt for a hefty fee) to party Y oblige you to provide it to party Z?

      There are multiple reasons to want the patch to be publicly available. One of them is just to reduce the PITA factor.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re: Fail idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the descriptions I have bothered looking at have language in it describing the type of security blunder- i.e execute code remotely- and a link to a more thorough explanation.

      Well, for Windows 7...

      Security Update for Windows 7 (KB3069392)

      With no blurb of what security blunder it was. Just generic text about what security updates mean. Going for more information and...

      MS15-072: Vulnerability in Windows graphics component could allow elevation of privilege: July 14, 2015 -- https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3069392

      Well, that's more useful...I guess. Honestly, though, the security update information has been obfuscated into a generic text, and you have to click "more information" on a couple links every month to get anything really useful out of the situation. And the information itself is still pretty vague. That's fine, I guess.

      The real problem is the mis-classification of updates to make them Critical/Urgent vs Important. Honestly, that MS chose to fundamentally break security updates for their own selfish ends really is such a fuck up I don't see how anyone can even trust any of the information they provide because they've proven they're tainting their own results.

      In short, the real answer is to dump Windows.

      PS - Linux distros do a pretty shitty job on giving you info on updates too. Even checking changelogs will sometimes only give you a vague "update ABI" or "sync with upstream" or such. But it's yet to be the case that I've ever gotten a security update or an update of any kind (no real distinction is made) for an outright "telemetry data" logger. The closest example was Ubuntu's desktop search which (1) was reported about early on, (2) was readily avoidable, and (3) was eventually removed. Not that that sets a good example, but if MS actually were to take steps to remove this whole "telemetry data" logger and make a promise (as empty as it inherently be given CEOs can change) then there'd be reason to consider Windows again.

      PPS - Most people avoided Unity anyways which was why (2) was a big inherent workaround. The same can't be said for Windows.

    15. Re: Fail idea by fox171171 · · Score: 1

      They already do this by offering totally meaningless descriptions. Reading descriptions does no good when they contain no actual information.

      Almost every one I have ever read said something like "A security issue has been identified that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to compromise your system and gain control over it."

      Nothing new. Just now Microsoft is the attacker who intends to gain complete control of your computer.

    16. Re:Fail idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If any number of people did this, then Microsoft would just push a "security" update that offered you Windows 10 or installed spying on the basis that they could somehow offer you more security. "KB6666666 - improve security by making windows phone home at every opportunity"

      Exactly. This is why you don't use Windows 10 ever, and why you can't trust Microsoft at all. It is not an accident, and it is their intention to spy on you in plain sight.

      Even this site has two update URL's commented out by default with hashtags in the hosts file blocklist.
      https://gitlab.com/windowslies/blockwindows

      Specifically here: https://github.com/WindowsLies/BlockWindows/blob/master/hosts

      This only happened in the latest update. The one before it they weren't commented out. It defeats the purpose, so why are they there now?

      I do notice that when I block those hosts upstream from one 8.1 machine... that machine spams trying to connect to Redmond, WA (*.*.*.153) infinitely even with the hosts file present on the machine itself.

      You can not trust Microsoft. This is one global public backstab too many. Maybe use Windows for games, but don't ever trust it for anything else. Use Linux for anything but Windows games until all game companies compile for Linux like they do for PS4. The PS4 uses a forked BSD kernel so obviously it's extremely doable to port to Linux too. Why don't they? Ask Microsoft. They may tell you it's to stop terrorism who knows. Whatever it is, it will be a lie.

      http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8000075&cid=50511399
      http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7988275&cid=50494871

    17. Re:Fail idea by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If you trust Microsoft, then just apply the updates and let them spy on you. There's a bunch of people here who claim that this is actually good for you, and that MS is just making sure they understand customer usage better and can improve their software with this information.

      If you don't trust Microsoft, then what the heck are you doing trusting their operating system to protect your critical data and privacy?

    18. Re:Fail idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you have to do to disable this is make a workgroup/local area network.

    19. Re: Fail idea by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      You have to go through an extra level of indirection, if you go to the description it's always something like "This fixes some stuff", but if you then follow through to the KB article you usually get the details of what's actually being done.

    20. Re:Fail idea by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      It's Microsoft servicing their customers in the sense of "the farmer brought in a bull to service his cows".

    21. Re: Fail idea by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, Microsoft has a solution for that: with Windows 10, they simply don't offer descriptions. They've also started bundling feature updates and security updates into single patches.

      Are linux distributions any better? I can't seem to remember if I got a detailed report of what is fixed or will be changed when I last did an apt-get upgrade.

      Should I care what's being updated on my OS? Yeah. Do I? No, not really. I usually have more important things to do then to read multiple change log for the one or two things buried that might have an effect on me.

    22. Re:Fail idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does it matter? If Bill Gates was still running the show, the security fixes would be a selling point for Windows 11, and Windows 10 would be left unpatched. Be thankful for what you're getting, or get/evangalize an open-source solution instead. I hate to evangelize open source to Windows users because I end up getting kicked in the teeth for some reason, but the mobile-wannabe Windows has me thinking that I have to do it anyway, for their own good and my own good as well.

    23. Re: Fail idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one difference is that if you upgrade Linux and there's an issue you can just (e.g.) restore your root partition from backup (or upgrade by dual booting and revert the same way). I understand that if you upgrade from Win 7 to Win 10 then your W7 license key is invalidated by the upgrade so you just can't go back even if you have a full backup.

    24. Re:Fail idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. If you trust Microsoft, then just apply the updates and let them spy on you. There's a bunch of people here who claim that this is actually good for you, and that MS is just making sure they understand customer usage better and can improve their software with this information.

      If you don't trust Microsoft, then what the heck are you doing trusting their operating system to protect your critical data and privacy?

      Movie about Microsoft, using fictitious name: Synapse. Clever name because of what synapses are. Great movie, if only it wasn't based on a real story. :(
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0218817/
      Title: Antitrust (2001)

      The "settled" Antitrust case.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.

      Now? Windows 10 is the ultimate global backstab in the history of Earth. They took your money and scoffed at your trust then made their primary "product" into a "service" that is literally global spyware in totality. The whole planet (anybody with 7/8/8.1/10) giving Microsoft access to their PC files, keystrokes, voice, and traffic. Meanwhile Bill is showing 79.2 billion USD in "net worth" and he's working on toilets in Africa.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesson_of_the_widow's_mite

      Upon 3 witnesses.
      http://www.drbo.org/x/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=19&l=24#x
      http://www.drbo.org/x/d?b=drb&bk=48&ch=10&l=25#x
      http://www.drbo.org/x/d?b=drb&bk=49&ch=18&l=25#x

      "And again I say to you: It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of heaven."

    25. Re: Fail idea by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I understand that if you upgrade from Win 7 to Win 10 then your W7 license key is invalidated by the upgrade so you just can't go back even if you have a full backup.

      Incorrect. Your old key continues to work and you can restore from backup or reinstall your old OS. Legally you're not allowed to upgrade to W10 and then use the W7 license for another computer, a VM, etc. But if you decide W10 isn't for you you can go back to your W7 license. It's the same thing as it's always been for commercial software upgrade licenses.

  2. easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install Ubuntu.

    1. Re:easy by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Or CentOS.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:easy by jmccue · · Score: 2

      Or Slackware -- just about any distro would make a good replacement for most people, but the few times I did that, all I heard "not like windows, windows is better" and the whining begins :) Now I do not care what people want to run, just do not call me.

    3. Re:easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest killing yourself.

    4. Re:easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you practice what you preach first...

  3. Make Windows Update Install Only Security Updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know of many small companies (up to 10 people) which use this method.

  4. simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Disable updates on Windows XP, or don't install any Microsoft (or American) software.

    1. Re:simple by klossner · · Score: 1

      There hasn't been an update to XP since 2014 April 8.

    2. Re:simple by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Bull. I update Windows XP just this week. I hacked the registry to make the OS think it's an embedded ATM machine.

      Microsoft is still supplying security updates for those machines.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:simple by Immerman · · Score: 1

      That's what makes it so simple!

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    4. Re:simple by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Did you actually hack the registry or apply a .reg file someone else already figured out
      (patched)?

      I mean the distinction is about as much as saying you hacked into a website when you deleted the file name in the address bar and was presented with a directory listing verses gaining admin privileges and locking all the registered users out or crediting them as having already paid for another year of access. One is a hack, the other is piss poor administration by the website. can you guess which is which?

    5. Re:simple by Cito · · Score: 1

      You can still keep XP updated weekly just about.

      You just change

      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\WPA\PosReady]

      "Installed"=dword:00000001

      and you will get latest windows updates for XP. By getting the updates the military and atm machines get :P

      I have an old fileserver with 8 shared hard drives ive just been too lazy to install anything else on it, as I have 2 linux boxes and a gaming box. plus laptop/tablet.

      so I just plugged all my extra hard drives into the xp and shared them all on lan. and run utorrent 2.2.1 the last version the original open source devs worked on before the company was sold. And I set it in options to run as a "web server"

      Now being lazy I can lay in bed on tablet and use the internal web to download torrents into fileserver and stream movies across lan in bed

    6. Re:simple by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Did you actually hack the registry or apply a .reg file someone else already figured out
      (patched)?

      I applied a hack as suggested elsewhere. I'm a retired IT guy and I'm pretty good, but not good enough to hack the registry on my own.

      --

      Here's the hack.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  5. Sorry Friend by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful
    When you opt for the Windows experience, you gonna get whatever experience they want you to get.

    But any way I know of of blocking any updates blocks all of them. like pulling the cable or disabling wifi.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Sorry Friend by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      When you opt for the Windows experience, you gonna get whatever experience they want you to get.

      But any way I know of of blocking any updates blocks all of them. like pulling the cable or disabling wifi.

      Sometimes you do not opt, but you get a mandate from above (say, current company merges with another one that has a bunch of windows systems to support). At this point we can try be professionals and do the best effort possible, or simply throw a tantrum and leave Windooze doesn't wanna play nice with you.

    2. Re:Sorry Friend by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      When you opt for the Windows experience, you gonna get whatever experience they want you to get.

      But any way I know of of blocking any updates blocks all of them. like pulling the cable or disabling wifi.

      Sometimes you do not opt, but you get a mandate from above (say, current company merges with another one that has a bunch of windows systems to support). At this point we can try be professionals and do the best effort possible, or simply throw a tantrum and leave Windooze doesn't wanna play nice with you.

      Right, just like I said - and your company better hope that the enterprise edition of Wondows 10 doesn't phone home with sensitive documents.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Sorry Friend by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      When you opt for the Windows experience, you gonna get whatever experience they want you to get.

      But any way I know of of blocking any updates blocks all of them. like pulling the cable or disabling wifi.

      Sometimes you do not opt, but you get a mandate from above (say, current company merges with another one that has a bunch of windows systems to support). At this point we can try be professionals and do the best effort possible, or simply throw a tantrum and leave Windooze doesn't wanna play nice with you.

      Right, just like I said - and your company better hope that the enterprise edition of Wondows 10 doesn't phone home with sensitive documents.

      Well, like everything. You presume a risk, and you try to mitigate it. Shit happens, you fix it. It is not the technical challenges or the fact that you have to work with shitty software that makes a job shitty, but the work culture, schedules, etc. You take the good with the bad, and the bad with the good. You weight your options while always acting professionally.

      Again, it is not what *you* opt, but what your tasks entail.

  6. Goodbye yellowbrook road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The fantasy was fun while it lasted, but Microsoft has become the enemy. My solution was to disable all updates on the Windows rig (running 7) and turn it into a glorified console. Then I got a mac.

    1. Re:Goodbye yellowbrook road by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      I got sad news for you dude. Microsoft was the enemy at least two decades ago or more. You're just now noticing today because you finally got computer literate enough to see their blatant and stupid evil.

    2. Re: Goodbye yellowbrook road by GrantRobertson · · Score: 1

      In about 1994 I tore a picture of Bill Gates out of a magazine and stuck it to my cubicle well with red thumbtacks, right in the eyeballs. That should tell you what I think of him and Microsoft.

      However, I still use Windows because there is certain software that just isn't available for Linux and I can't stand using a Mac. I have only been able to "survive" because I used to be a network manager. Now I am seriously considering switching to Linux for my "daily driver" and using Windows in a very controlled and isolated virtual machine for all the stuff I use that only runs on Windows.

  7. I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux as an alternative OS, but then I remembered how I was treated like a filthy guinea pig when Debian decided to transition to systemd. When I upgraded my Debian testing (which, contrary to its name, has little to do with testing and has historically been far more stable than even the stable releases of other Linux distros) workstation and systemd was unexpectedly installed, everything went to hell. My workstation wouldn't boot, the error logging was all fucked up, and all I found when googling for help were many other complaints about various problems from many other victims.

    Knowing how frustrating it can be when an operating system provider ends up trashing an existing installation through what should be routine updates, I realized that I could not possibly recommend Debian. Perhaps the submitter could do what I did: switch to FreeBSD. It's a mature, reliable, robust operating system that can still run a wide variety of the software that runs on Linux. Its developers care deeply about not damaging existing installations. FreeBSD has shown itself to be the future.

    1. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Knowing how frustrating it can be when an operating system provider ends up trashing an existing installation through what should be routine updates, I realized that I could not possibly recommend Debian. Perhaps the submitter could do what I did: switch to FreeBSD.

      Well, there's also switching to Linux Mint, which is what I suggest at this time. I'll probably keep advocating that at least up until they decide what to do about systemd in the long term. Hopefully, longer.

      FreeBSD has shown itself to be the future.

      It's not even the present if you want a decent nVidia driver or if you want to run vmware, which I still use to handle some cases that make KVM shit itself. Other than that, I have nothing against it, but that's enough to make it a show-stopper for me. Linux also runs on more hardware, and I prefer to have more or less one OS on everything for my convenience. My router runs Linux, my NAS runs Linux, my desktop (not the gaming one, but anyway) runs Linux, my handhelds even run Linux, albeit a kind of wacky version thereof. Oh yeah, got a fire stick coming, that runs Linux. All my game consoles with ethernet ports run Linux when I want them to, except for the 360... which I am probably about to donate to someone who lost all their shit in the recent fires. Guess I should put the screws back in it just in case they ever drop it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might also consider NetBSD. It runs on everything, and you can configure it to work pretty much like FreeBSD..

      NetBSD went through their own startup process controversy a few years ago, when they switched from traditional rc to a set of scripts under rc.d.

      There was a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth in the run-up, but after they implemented it, there was really no problem. It allows you to start and restart services in any order, preserving dependencies without special script renaming, binary configurations or runlevels. It's a straightforward solution that works well, does what it's supposed to do, and nothing more.

    3. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps you could provide some constructive advice that falls into his requirements - NOT CHANGING OS. I know, Windows sucks, blah blah blah, but the submitter is not asking for your opinion on whether Windows sucks and he should switch. Switching is not an option NOW and he needs advice on securing it NOW.

    4. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      The first paragraph is a fallacious appeal to antiquity. Those 'old school' desktops are what allow people to create the content for those idiot consumption devices you love so much. Btw, 'multiple core design' was a thing long before social media and smartphones.

      The second lacks examples. 'Social media' is hardly an enterprise solution for mail, and it comes with a boatload of negatives regarding privacy and security. Sure, email is not usually crypted, but at least the server is under local control and runs on the localnet, keeping private corporate matters private. About the only thing 'social media' messaging is good for is browser tracking, ads, and broadcasting of narcissistic histrionics.

      The last paragraph is not an argument. It's an emotional appeal. The irony, here, is that those social media services you think are so hip run on such data centers. Those 'old school' servers are what allow people to create and run the services those idiot consumption devices you love so much depend on.

    5. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ps3, ps4, wii u all run a custom FreeBSD.

    6. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by rl117 · · Score: 2

      nVidia do provide a FreeBSD driver. (I wish AMD did the same, since the xorg drivers are currently not supporting the latest cards.)

    7. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You do know where you are, right? It's traditional that any question about Windows is, invariably, responded with suggestions to change operating systems. I'm pretty sure some of us change our operating system more time than we change our man panties. Either way, no matter what OS question is asked in here, somebody will suggest changing it - and be adamant about their choice.

      This hasn't changed in all these years. It's not going to change now.

      I mean, I'm in another state, connected to my box at home (which is currently running Lubuntu), through VNC, using a live disk on this laptop, and using a fresh image of GhostBSD in a VM on the desktop that I'm remotely connected to. You sure as shit shouldn't expect rational responses (or help - of any kind) from us. I even configured SAMBA on the remote box... From here... In a Virtual Machine...

      Niagara Falls is just up the road. There's a football game going on I understand. I'm in my hotel, eating cold pizza, and geeking out. And this is VACATION.

      Seriously... I'm the more sane one around here. Do you *really* expect rational responses from us? Really? Or did you just want to complain and be a member of the 'in' crowd for a few seconds?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      it may have had the slight advantage of not being developed by a narcissistic aspie kraut wanker with a reputation for never finishing things before chucking them over the wall and getting out the next toy..

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      nVidia do provide a FreeBSD driver.

      When Ubuntu and Debian went systemd I looked into FreeBSD and found that the FreeBSD driver lags considerably and generally doesn't work as well as the Linux driver. So I decided to stick with Linux for my desktop Unix needs. I may explore FreeBSD for headless servers in the future, but I have a Debian system with systemd pinned away which is still working OK for me.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by rl117 · · Score: 1

      I'm in pretty much the same situation. Server-side, I'm now 100% FreeBSD; client-side I'm using a mixture of MacOSX/Windows/FreeBSD/Linux (Debian unstable w/ pinned sysvinit) but ideally I'd like a FreeBSD or Linux desktop with full graphics support. I currently have an AMD R9 390 GPU which would be excellent were it not for the lagging driver support on both platforms. I've been playing around with a few minor Linux distributions; shame all the mainstream ones are no longer suitable.

    11. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a nickel, kid. Get yourself a real computer.

    12. Re: I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I switched to Kali Linux.
      Now when I need to use Windows I just break into my neighbors wifi and take control of their Windows.

    13. Re:I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you might be talking about Theo, but he's not German.

    14. Re: I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netbsd even runs on my abacus.

    15. Re: I was going to suggest Debian GNU/Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the consumption devices are not idiotic. It's the people who believe that somehow social networking and other outlets for immature minds with limited attention spans somehow have anything to do with business besides marketing to other narcissists.

  8. Sorry, but you're screwed by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You'll get what Microsoft wants and like it, or not - they don't care about your preferences anymore.

    If you want to send them a message, stop buying their software. This is a less painful option than it used to be, believe it or not.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Sorry, but you're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pretty happy with Mint 17.2 XFCE so far. Everything autodetected. The problems I expect to see:

      No Turbotax
      Gaming (yes, WINE, etc. etc.)

      For document creation, photo editting etc its fine.

    2. Re:Sorry, but you're screwed by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      LOL

    3. Re: Sorry, but you're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop buying their software? Windows 10 is free, nobody has to buy it.

    4. Re:Sorry, but you're screwed by LVSlushdat · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'll get what Microsoft wants and like it, or not - they don't care about your preferences anymore.

      If you want to send them a message, stop buying their software. This is a less painful option than it used to be, believe it or not.
      --

      Not only stop buying, but STOP USING their software.. The reason Windows 10 is free is because YOU ARE THE PRODUCT that MS is *selling* to
      anybody with the right # of $, plus I have to imagine they're in tight with the NSA, since the NSA needs to fill that giant datacenter in Utah, and what better
      data than EVERYTHING you type, say and see on the computer that *used* to be YOURS and now belongs to MS.. Its a proven fact that 10 keylogs and captures large quantities of video/audio from any microphones/cameras on said system.. I used/admin'ed Windows for over 25 years (1991-2010) and when I retired I swore I'd quit using MS products and stay on Linux. It pains me to see how Americans have become nothing but lemmings running full-tilt off the cliff when it comes to computers... I have no fear either, that *if* enough of us non-lemmings skip sucking on MS's tit, and instead use of the many Linux/BSD distros, it won't be long before we're branded terrorists by this "government".... Hope I'm dead and buried by then (65 now..)

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    5. Re:Sorry, but you're screwed by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Forgot to say "AND FORWARDS IT TO MS".... Wish the FUCK /. would get an "edit-comment" thingie...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    6. Re:Sorry, but you're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ignore the confinement, bad food, and occassional beatings and rape, prison is pretty awesome!

    7. Re: Sorry, but you're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep your Windows drive and swap when you do taxes once per year.

    8. Re:Sorry, but you're screwed by imboboage0 · · Score: 1

      Alas, burned by the preview button.

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    9. Re: Sorry, but you're screwed by binarylarry · · Score: 2

      Bro, you also forgot to change MS to M$!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    10. Re:Sorry, but you're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Those are the two that held me back. Eliminated one by using TaxAct's online filing. Very solid alternative to Turbotax imho (and 40 bucks cheaper).

    11. Re:Sorry, but you're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish the FUCK /. would get an "edit-comment" thingie...

      Why? So we can no longer laugh at your expense for the stupid things you say and do?

    12. Re: Sorry, but you're screwed by geoskd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Stop buying their software? Windows 10 is free, nobody has to buy it.

      Just because you didn't give them money up front, doesn't mean there aren't other costs associated with using the products. One has to ask how long before microsoft starts selling advertising services to customers that can't be blocked because its the OS that’s feeding you the ads? Only way out is to buy enterprise edition? Guess what, that costs $200 per seat, and unlike past generations of PCs, when you buy a PC now, you're getting the free version of windows, so now that $500 PC is actually going to cost you $700 to get what you used to get. You as the tech support guy need to warn your friends and family that this is what they have signed up for with windows 10. Beyond that warning, refuse to support it, and tell grandma that you would be happy to install Ubuntu or Debian, or some other such that really *is* free.

      As long as you keep trying to do free tech support for microsoft, they're going to keep shitting on people like you. If the product doesn't work, why are you fixing it for microsoft? tell the people that if they have trouble they need to contact microsoft for tech support, and when microsoft refuses, that's when you offer one of the Linux variants.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    13. Re:Sorry, but you're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just out of curiosity, why don't you just use turbotax's website? It's just a bunch of forms anyway. Even on my Windows devices I never had to download anything.

    14. Re: Sorry, but you're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Patently false. It is free for one year to those who validly bought Win 7/8. It reatails for $119/$199 for Home or Pro if you need a fresh license.

    15. Re: Sorry, but you're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the author explained, he has retarded relatives; they won't move away from Windows 10, and probably don't even understand the implications of using Windows 10.

      Giving the answer "Abandon them" is a valid one, but not necessarily an acceptable one. I feel (almost) the same way about suicides, the mentally ill, gun zealots, anti-gun zealots, Republicans, Democrats, Communist/Anarchists, Deists, and fetuses. Some people "Can't give you up" even though they're both guys.

      I will say "avoid competence in Windows products" its not a professional attitude to take for people who are elbows deep in the muck that is computer industry.

    16. Re:Sorry, but you're screwed by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      If we ignore the datamining and forced updates, which are two things that most people are actually fine to put up with, Windows 10 is pretty awesome OS.

      Smooth, fast, runs all the apps, has premium drivers.

      Should have been modded "Insightful +5".

      The forced updates will mean that if MS fucks up, they pull the plug on the majority of the world's computing infrastructure. Teehee, guess how thorough those patches will be tested? Pretty thorough is my guess. And since everyone has the same environment, barring drivers and antivirus software, this should take less effort than it used to. So, I don't think more than 1% of the population will care. This could change when MS actually does kill off everyone's installation, but I'm prepared to wait and see on this one.

      For most people continuous updates will be a huge improvement because botnets will have a smaller attack surface. If they *do* find a vulnerability it will affect everyone, but it will also very likely be patched rapidly and rolled out right away. Security researchers will find their work easier too: they just have to deal with one version of the OS, and not with all of the subversions.

      The datamining is my biggest issue, but I'll just have to find a way to patch the ethernet driver to drop selected packets, if the antivirus tools won't give me an option to block the telemetry from phoning home. I guess we'll see "phoneblockers" popping up this year, or next year at the latest.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    17. Re:Sorry, but you're screwed by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Or just use the excell form that are out there with all the math embedded in the forms already. They work great and work in open office as well.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  9. Server and SCCM? by buckfeta2014 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    SCCM can push patches whenever the admin feels like it... maybe this would work for you? Although it would require setting up the server somewhere.

    --
    Buck Feta. You know what to do.
    1. Re:Server and SCCM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That only works if you reverse engineer every patch, to see what it does. Then Microsoft makes that update a requirement for all there software and further updates, and bundles the update with all there applications, and compliers, so it will be folded into every program compiled with a Microsoft complier.
      .
      Company software choices are getting a lot simpler: if you need to have information on your computer that should not be made public, you can't run any Microsoft software. I don't even need to show that another OS is better of cheaper, I just ask legal if what MS does is compatible with the NDA's we have signed, and I get a blank check to look for alternatives. Thankfully Autodesk is also switching to annual licences, so no loss of investment if we try alternatives for a while.

  10. Re:Make Windows Update Install Only Security Updat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's nice that you know someone who did it. It only counts as information, though, if you actually tell us how.

  11. run and hide by denbesten · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unless you wish to become the IT department for your sizeable extended family, don't touch this. The moment you take over patch management is the moment that others (Microsoft, Geek Squad, MS Fixit, etc.) cease being able to fix minor problems when their PCs go goofy.

    If you do want to become the IT department, look into Microsoft's Enterprise solutions. They continue to allow personalized patch management there.

    1. Re:run and hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No - all you can do is delay.

      Not refuse.

    2. Re:run and hide by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I'm responding to echo this sentiment too. Yes, don't touch this at all! Of the advice I can offer for Windows users is this, make damn sure you get a full nightly BMR backup. I highly recommend a Veeam Endpoint Backup as it's FREE, simple to setup and can target local, attached storage, or a NAS drive as the target. While Windows Professional, Ultimate, and Enterprise offer BMR, its backup program has been deprecated by lack of 4k sector support of drives; even 512e is a fail in this regard. Anyways, should shit hit the fan from a botched update, you now have a way to perform a full restore from a bootable USB thumb drive, pick your restore point, and sit back with a beer and relax and the full recovery takes place.

      Your other option is to go Apple OSX and rely on Time Machine for backups. No, I'm very serious. I'd get my father to go Apple if it wasn't for the fact he loves his Flight Sim games.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:run and hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not get him an Apple desktop/laptop, and only setup his PC to run games?

      The hackers break in, there's no personal information (other than what's in the game), no bank accounts, no tax returns, photos, etc..

    4. Re: run and hide by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Thought about it, but It needs to be as simple as possible. Aside from my own mother using it often, it takes her some time to realize the monitor is in standby, so proceeds to push the power button on the PC when it just needed to be woken up via the mouse *facepalm*. Adding more complexity isn't the answer such as throwing in a KVM with a shared home office space.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  12. Just do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://winsupersite.com/windows-10/how-stop-windows-10-upgrade-downloading-your-system

  13. Re:is this an article or quesiont ?! by Cassini2 · · Score: 1

    It's a question without a good answer. There doesn't appear to be a "permanently prevent Windows 10 upgrade" switch anywhere.

    This could be a business opportunity. Write a piece of software that automatically finds and suppresses any attempts to update to Windows 10.

  14. Windows 7 EOL is coming soon by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Informative
    According to microsoft policies Windows 7 is already out of mainline support. It will have extended support till 2020. But according to its own policies, win7 should be getting only security updates, no "improvements" nor "enhancements". So in a just and fair world, you should get only critical security updates alone for Windows 7.

    But, as Scar told the mouse, "Life isn't fair, is it?".

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Windows 7 EOL is coming soon by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

      That Win7 EOL is "coming soon" is a pretty good exaggeration. Very soon now Ubuntu 15.10 is being released, you'll have 16.04 LTS, 16.10, 17.04, 17.10, 18.04 LTS, 18.10, 19.04, 19.10 and 20.04 LTS before Win7 expires. Ten distro versions and three long time support releases later, a lot could change between now and then. I switched to Linux back in early 2007 because Vista was terrible but returned to Win7 in late 2010 mainly because of gaming. And I do have a laptop upgraded to Win10, unlike Vista it's not a bad OS except it comes with too many bundled privacy invasions. The OS is stable, the drivers work, IO handling seems faster, technically I haven't found any reason not to upgrade.except the anti-features.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Windows 7 EOL is coming soon by LVSlushdat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to microsoft policies [microsoft.com] Windows 7 is already out of mainline support. It will have extended support till 2020. But according to its own policies, win7 should be getting only security updates, no "improvements" nor "enhancements". So in a just and fair world, you should get only critical security updates alone for Windows 7.

      But, as Scar told the mouse, "Life isn't fair, is it?".

      WHO THE FUCK CARES if it gets no "improvements" nor "enhancements"... 7 was the last tolerable Window s version, and if you can keep that insidious "telemetry" crap off of it, it should be good for the next 5 years or so, if for *some* reason you HAVE to stay on Windows...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    3. Re:Windows 7 EOL is coming soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that it[Win7] has been getting the telemetry that plagues Windows 10 as backported patches.

    4. Re:Windows 7 EOL is coming soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats actually a GOOD move - i do not want any "new features" anyway!

    5. Re:Windows 7 EOL is coming soon by caseih · · Score: 1

      Sounds great to me. I don't need any improvements or enhancements. Nice to know I can keep Windows 7 around for another 5 years. After that maybe Wine will be good enough to run the few windows apps I might want to use. Or ReactOS. ;)

    6. Re:Windows 7 EOL is coming soon by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      That's alright. My Windows 7 is running fine and I am definitely not looking for anything else than security updates.

    7. Re:Windows 7 EOL is coming soon by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Win 7 SP1 EOL has already passed, it's in extended support meaning you have to pay them to fix anything about the OS. They'll release security updates but if your hardware doesn't work or the software doesn't do what it's supposed to do, they won't fix it nor will any new features be added.

      Ubuntu support is a lot more extensive since it will fix software issues and integrate new features from upstream libraries for the extent of the support life. Plus you can still buy support for very early Ubuntu versions if you want too.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    8. Re:Windows 7 EOL is coming soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Run your work and personal stuff in Linux, only run games with Windows 10 (or buy a console). I don't understand why people find this such a difficult concept.

    9. Re:Windows 7 EOL is coming soon by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      Hell, you can run games fine on Linux most of the time now. Was playing Rust earlier today, been playing Shadow of Mordor before that, etc. Well over half of my Steam library is Linux games, and the smaller portion that isn't is largely much older former AAA titles that are mostly fun for how graphically impressive they were (so it's no big loss if I can't play them now). Some of those titles run fine in Wine but are extremely glitchy in modern versions of Windows, even . . .

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  15. Threat Model Failure by Gim+Tom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The "conventional wisdom" of having automatic updates on is to keep the huge ecosystem of windows desktops and laptops at least reasonably up to date, especially as to security issues, and this has to some extent worked. However, this new policy of trying to cram windows 10 down everyone's throat is beginning to have the opposite effect. Many people I know, myself included, have disabled automatic updates and more will follow. I have been asked many times how to stop upgrading from Windows 7 to Windows 10 and about the only answer I can give is either to turn automatic updates off or switch to Linux. Since few people are willing to move to Linux this change by Microsoft is actually increasing the threat from people using windows platforms.

    Now in Windows 10, with no indication of what a given update may contain or do it opens the door to just about anything on those machines. Somehow this makes me think of the recent unpleasantness that Volkswagen has unleashed upon itself. Just trust me to do the right thing. I am not a great admirer of Regan, either as an actor or politician, but one thing he said was on the mark. "Trust but verify."

    1. Re: Threat Model Failure by garethjrowlands · · Score: 1

      If the corporation that writes your OS or browser wants to be evil, it is very hard for an individual to stop them. Think of all the people using Chrome - the auto update ship has already sailed. The situation is not significantly better in Apple's ecosystem either. The VW thing actually offers hope: regulators *can* make a difference. And the quality of the regulator matters (it's a feather in the cap for the US and a frying pan in the face for Europe). Do you think individuals should be doing their own emissions tests on their cars? Do you read the Chrome source and build it yourself? I don't.

    2. Re:Threat Model Failure by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am not a great admirer of Regan, either as an actor or politician, but one thing he said was on the mark. "Trust but verify."

      Although, according to Wikipedia, Trust but verify was originally a Russian proverb taught to Regan by an adviser:

      Suzanne Massie, a writer on Russia, met with President Ronald Reagan many times between 1984 and 1987.[1] She taught him the Russian proverb, "doveryai no proveryai" (trust, but verify) advising him that "The Russians like to talk in proverbs.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:Threat Model Failure by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info! I knew it was from a Russian saying, but had never looked into it deeper than that.

    4. Re: Threat Model Failure by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Do you think individuals should be doing their own emissions tests on their cars?

      Depends. Before getting my car to the inspection, I measure the CO level and adjust it so it is below the allowed maximum. I guess with newer cars you do not need to do that, they adjust themselves automatically (well, most of the time, anyway).

    5. Re:Threat Model Failure by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Also, this will most likely extend the life of Windows 7. If people disable updates, then who is going to care when Microsoft stops providing new updates? Updates will be disables anyway.

    6. Re:Threat Model Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run WSUS. Problem solved.

    7. Re:Threat Model Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Windows 8.1, and I'm very happy with it thankyousomuch.

      It took me about six minutes, once it started annoying me enough, to find out how to shut up the Windows 10 upgrade nagware once and for all. Just for you, here's the answer. It hasn't bugged me since.

  16. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My reading of Woody Leonhard's advice is that the only way to ensure the upgrade doesn't happen is to disable Windows Update, but that seems extreme. I want my family to install security updates,"

    Well then. Just disable windows update.
    And educate them on not running anything from random website.

    And anyway if they are mainly using it for email, some video/streaming, libreoffice or whatever, there's no reason for them to have anything weird, don't they?

  17. Downloading != Installing by sanf780 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let us assume Windows is downloading Windows 10 automatically, even if you did not reserve it. Do you get Windows 10 installed by doing the typical "You need to restart your computer in order to get security updates"? If that is not what happens, then the only thing wrong is downloading 3.5GB worth of unwanted data. It is still wrong, though. I do not think people are installing Windows 10 without ever clicking on YES somewhere. I am sure it is the user's fault if they click. It is always the user's fault if they install unwanted/malware software that was bundled with other software by clicking a YES button.
    So, do not spread wrong rumours, pretty please. I have not heard of anybody installing Windows 10 without his/her consent.

    1. Re:Downloading != Installing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give this man a cookie.

      Moreover, I doubt that you could accidentally trigger a Windows 10 upgrade if you use Windows 7 as a regular (i.e. non-admin) user.

    2. Re:Downloading != Installing by ITRambo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You are incorrect. I have a couple of customers that had Windows 10 install automatically while they were away. They claim to never have authorized this. One of my own workstations kept trying to install Windows 10 as an update for Windows 7 Pro, until I turned off Automatic Updates. A second identical workstation hasn't done this. It may be random. You have too much faith in Microsoft software being infallible. All software is buggy. You don't need to click YES this time around. PC's having Windows 7 replaced with Windows 10 with no user input is real. On the other hand, I've had a couple of customers that had broken Windows 7 installations. After making drive images, I got their okay to upgrade to Windows 10. In each case the PC ran much better and the problems. broken IE11 for one, were fixed. So, Windows 10 is a mixed bag. I like it when it's not being force fed.

    3. Re:Downloading != Installing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then the only thing wrong is downloading 3.5GB worth of unwanted data

      And this is the problem. Not everyone is on unmetered or cheap internet access. Having shit like this forced on them costs them money.

      My parents are in the middle of a house move, currently staying in temporary accomodation until their new place is ready. The only option for them right now is PAYG mobile broadband at £10 per GB.
      So it's a toss up between disabling windows update for them and risk a couple of weeks without security updates, or spend £35 downloading something they don't want.

      If anyone from Microsoft is reading this.. FUCK YOU. Go fuck yourself with a big,long, splintery wooden stick.
      Didn't anyone there engage a single braincell before pushing this shitty act of desparation through?

    4. Re:Downloading != Installing by JimMcc · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately many users just click on the ok button, or whatever button they think will make the dialog box go away. They are more intent on consuming the content then on what is actually happening on their system. My wife is a perfect example; despite years of my trying to get her to ask about dialog boxes that pop up that she doesn't understand, she still just clicks ok and moves on. Sometimes she'll comment about why does this keep happening, but generally she just wants her Faceballs access to continue without interruption. Sadly, this is most likely the norm.

    5. Re:Downloading != Installing by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      You have too much faith in Microsoft software being infallible.

      I'm pretty sure *no one* thinks this. :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    6. Re:Downloading != Installing by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      I have a 10 gb limit before I start having my Internet throttled. Two windows 7 machines on it can take 70% of my monthly connection and those are the least used machines (one doesn't even have a keyboard attached. Having MS enforced downloads of Win 10 that I ABSOLUTELY DO NOT WANT AND WILL NOT USE take most of my months Internet away from me would be beyond annoying. Didn't the XBox always on Internet connection debacle teach them anything?

    7. Re:Downloading != Installing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbass. These idiots don't know what they are doing. They did authorize the upgrade. They just don't know they did. That's how clueless they are. Just as bad, you believed them. I suppose in your book the customer is always right.

    8. Re:Downloading != Installing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Within Windows update, when first opened, it will ask you if you want to install Windows 10 or proceed to normal updates. When you select normal updates, Windows 10 is in the optional update category and has to be manually selected to be downloaded. The customers likely were not paying attention to what they were doing and clicked select all in the optional category when doing an update.

  18. Stop installing updates use windows for games only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn off all the services you don't need (Its not as easy anymore since Microsoft stopped documenting dependencies properly after Windows XP but give it a try). Use this semihardened machine for games ony and use another machine running Linux,BSD or OSX for work,banking and anything of importance. Windows is basically a gamingplatrom now so use it for that ONLY. (execpt the games you can get on "non toy" platforms that is.

  19. It will NOT install automatically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    MS forcing the download is NOT the same thing as forcing the upgrade.
    Of course someone could accidentally click Install, but it won't do it automatically.

    Second, just go into Windows update and uninstall and hide all the updates you don't want, including the 'Windows 10 Upgrade'. Done.
    Now you can forget about it and rest easy.

    1. Re:It will NOT install automatically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...rest easy knowing all your keystrokes are getting logged onto Microsoft's servers. Whew, that's a relief.

    2. Re:It will NOT install automatically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you "uninstall and hide the updates you don't want" when Microsoft doesn't bother to add a meaningful (and complete) description to the updates? And don't even start on merging multiple changes into a single update. Keeping Windows secure is getting more manual and much more time-consuming than my boss is willing to pay for. Microsoft has single-handedly destroyed there consumer AND commercial market, at the same time. Well done. customers can add there problems to the Microsoft support form, and switch there computer off until at least 2025.

    3. Re:It will NOT install automatically by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      ...until the next patch that will reinstall it and reactivate everything...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:It will NOT install automatically by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Or not.

      Any reason beyond out of control paranoia why you'd think Microsoft would do something so outrageously destructive? Remember: forced updates mean forced incompatibilities. A sizable minority of the population will find their PCs unfit for purpose the moment Windows 10 is installed on it.

      The lawsuits would bankrupt Microsoft in a matter of weeks.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  20. Install Linux by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The slashdot knee-jerk response is "Install Linux". But it might actually be time to have that conversation. You don't feel your OS vendor has your best interests in mind and is trying to jam some crap you don't want down your throat. Do you stick with them because they're familiar or do you switch vendors? The answer is going to be different for everyone. My parents use their computer as a dumb terminal to the internet, use OpenOffice.org for the few documents they do write and they aren't gamers. I could switch them to Linux and they'd never notice the difference. People with a lot of games, photography professionals who have to run Photoshop and people who do video editing might have a different answer.

    Of course, you don't have to install Linux. Maybe some people would be happier with Apple. You run into a lot of the same problems with them -- Apple looks out for Apple. I got tired of beating my head against my computer to make it work in the mid 2000s and ran Apple hardware for nearly a decade. You plug their shit in, it just works. It's tempting. But even more than Microsoft, their software thinks it knows how you should be working and it's difficult or impossible to do anything differently. You start banging your head against your computer again, and at least with Linux when you do that, you damn well can make the system do what you want it to. Apple's gaming scene when I was using them was only marginally better than Linux's -- you could make a couple of big MMOs and some decade-old games work with their systems.

    You could also go with FreeBSD. I don't know a lot about them, but with the whole systemd debacle, a lot of people are moving in that direction now. I'd have to set it up and run it for a while before I could recommend it to relatives.

    So that pretty much leaves me with Linux. If you're moving away from Microsoft because you don't like their agenda, you probably don't want a commercial distribution of Linux, either. Find one with an active community that has politics you like and go with them. Or just decide that maybe you can put up with Microsoft's bullshit after all. That's your choice, right there, and you should be able to talk intelligently with your relatives about it.

    You don't have to stay there once you make that move, either. I've just about eliminated all the Apple stuff I had going on -- my old Core 2 Duo Macbook is running Linux and my destop dual boots windows and Linux. I'm still booting back to Windows for the games collection and because getting files off my Android phone is easier with Windows. I prefer Kdenlive in Linux for editing my GoPro videos, but I mostly just clip a bit off the front and back of the video and tweak the contrast and sharpening.

    The point is that for all these things you always have that choice. Live with your current vendor's bullshit or find some vendor whose bullshit you can tolerate.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Install Linux by LVSlushdat · · Score: 2

      NO KIDDING!! I'm a retired Linux/Windows admin, and I run a tiny local business doing "Windows Janitorial Services" and "upgrading" systems to Linux. The "company" is me and two other guys I knew from my last company prior to retirement. I started the "Linux upgrade" thing with several neighbors who had gotten their older XP systems munged up with a large amount of malware, and had no recovery disks. I gave them a choice: Linux or a new system, as I didnt think they'd appreciate a bll for umpteen hours of cleanup when in their case, it was a "nuke/repave" the system. I gave them an Ubuntu LiveCD and had them run on it a few days.. They approved the install and word spread.. Since this first one around 2010, I've done over 30, all by word of mouth.. Now I'm getting calls about the privacy implications of Windows 10 on a new system the caller just bought.. Once again, the olde "LiveCD" for a couple of days to see if they can do their system use-case on Linux.. So far, I've upgraded several brand new systems that came with 10, and the owners have been quite happy with it.. I suspect as more and more people understand the privacy implications of Windows 10, I could have more business than I know what to do with...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    2. Re:Install Linux by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm still booting back to Windows for the games collection and because getting files off my Android phone is easier with Windows.

      I use ES File Explorer on my Android devices, it has pretty good network file share support. Some Android distributions can also be twiddled to mount smbfs and nfs directly. And finally, you can also just run a samba server on Android.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Install Linux by JimMcc · · Score: 1

      Sadly, this isn't always an option. For users who's only use of a computer is watching cat videos, doing email, etc., sure this option is a good one. But some of us have Windows forced down our throats due to applications we are required to run. I'm a marine electrician and virtually all of the diagnostic and configuration tools that various vendors provide require Windows. As a side line I do vinyl graphics work and the only reliable and realistic solutions run on Windows. I'll admit that I haven't tried Wine in a few years, but last time I tried it Wine still wouldn't run outlier applications and even some that it would run didn't run reliably. If you're futzing around on your desktop, or working on hobby use, that's fine. But if you are doing professional work in an industry with predominantly Windows only tools, and you are billing for your time, you need to be cost effective and reliable to be competitive. That means that you must have at least one machine, or VM instance, which runs Windows.

    4. Re:Install Linux by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      The slashdot knee-jerk response is "Install Linux". But it might actually be time to have that conversation.

      The time to have that conversation was back when Windows ME was launched, or even Windows XP.

      We are way, way past that point now. For all the "OMG M$ is the evilz!" nonsense, Windows 10 is one of the nicest Windows launches they have had. It takes much of what was great about 7 and combines the improvements from 8 and puts them together.

      Linux might have had a chance 15 years ago to take a decent share of the desktop market. That ship has sailed...

    5. Re:Install Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody already use Linux cell phones, Linux tablets and Linux routers. Moving to a Linux desktop/laptop PC is the logical next step.

      Linux is not a problem for old people either. These are the people who invented the computers and spacecraft and satellites 50 years ago - of course they will be able to use a modern computer.

    6. Re:Install Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, the Linux ship sailed away many years ago and left MS far behind. Desktop systems is a small unprofitable niche market. Linux runs on everything else and that is where the real money is.

    7. Re: Install Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious, ES File Explorer - not open sourced, China based, probably never considered the permissions it uses, and you're posting about in a Windows privacy thread. The irony is overflowing.

    8. Re:Install Linux by temcat · · Score: 1

      I'd like to. Still no OSS or proprietary GUI-based FineReader equivalent ready for serious work (with area selection). The CLI FineReader Engine doesn't cut it. This is the only thing that prevents me from fully switching to Linux for work needs.

    9. Re:Install Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone provide a reasonable explanation as to why there are technical folk, in the wild, installing and encouraging the use of OpenOffice.org anymore? Inquiring minds want to know.

    10. Re: Install Linux by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hilarious, ES File Explorer - not open sourced, China based, probably never considered the permissions it uses,

      Ever considered AppOpsExposed? Also, I don't keep secrets on my phone, or in Chrome, etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Install Linux by Endymion · · Score: 1

      That's what you get when you buy a product that depends on a single vendor for its mission-critical supply chain.

      As you are a marine, you should be concerned about how much of your ability to function as an armed force depends strictly on a single vendor. Engineering fields and especially defence suppliers traditionally required a second source for any mission-critical parts.

      Then again, what do I know. Given that the armed forces seem to be fine depending on China for most military hardware, what's another Sword of Damocles hanging our head?

      --
      Ce n'est pas une signature automatique.
    12. Re:Install Linux by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've been having that conversation more often recently, not because I think I should (I don't keep track of what goes on in the Windows world), but because people who know I run Linux have been approaching me. My advice remains the same:try switching to open source apps first (LibreOffice, etc.), and make sure you're comfortable with them before you even think about switching the main OS. A few people are so mad about Win10, though, that they've been insisting on more. So then I say, "get a live CD or thumbdrive system, and seriously, try it before you commit."

      They're honestly stunned that I'm not trying to proselytize the system I use and persuade them all that they should convert immediately. But honestly, the ones who try it my way, and still end up deciding to switch tend to be a lot happier. As do the ones who end up not switching. It's a win all around!:)

    13. Re:Install Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's still not that time yet.

      You say install linux.

      Ok. Which linux? Ask 100 'linux experts' that question and you'll get at LEAST 15 different answers.

      And that's unacceptable. People don't want to spend their time fucking with the os like you do. They don't give a damm about the os.
      They just want it to run the shit they wanted. and that's NOT linux yet.

      Should be. There's been enough years go by now. But no.
        still a giant clusterfuck of versions and incompatable programs. substandard 'RTFM NOOB!' help and way too much conflicting or outdated information.

    14. Re:Install Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are way, way past that point now. For all the "OMG M$ is the evilz!" nonsense, Windows 10 is one of the nicest Windows launches they have had. It takes much of what was great about 7 and combines the improvements from 8 and puts them together.

      You sound like another Microsoft fanboy to me. Windows 10 still doesn't fix the start menu, even though they have been pretending they were going to do that ever since Windows 8.1. Sure, you can get rid of the terrible start screen, and even the just as terrible mini start screen on the side of the start menu. Then you can disable all the useless stuff on the start menu, and end up with a lot of blank space - and still have NO WAY to add shortcuts or folders (sub menus) to it.

      Windows 8.1: Now you can boot to desktop, so you'll never see the much hated start screen. And we added the start button back - but when you click on it, it will show the start screen that we just promised you will never see.

      Windows 10: Now you can click the start button and get a useless gray rectangle, that you can't add any shortcuts to.

    15. Re:Install Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beating your head against an Apple computer because you can't do what you want with it? Either you can't tell the difference between a phone and a general-purpose computer or you're flat-out lying.

      You can do whatever you like with Mac. I'm a developer - I install what I want and I use whatever software I please. No controls, no restrictions, no checks on what I'm doing, no "authenticity" checks on software, no sneaky upgrades. It's a real and viable alternative to Windows. I'd be laughing at the all pain MS customers have been through since the Win8 debacle, except that our products are cross-platform and we've had to experience it all first hand. What I can't understand is that so many people have the choice to move, but keep accepting all the garbage MS forces on them. It's like some kind of Stockholm syndrome.

    16. Re:Install Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moment Microsoft started these shenanigans where they mis-classify their updates to sneak past a user's preference was the moment they lost all credibility.

      Say what you want about Windows. Nobody liked Windows because it was Windows. Everybody uses it because they need to run certain programs. Even people that hate it kinda arranged themselves with it - not using any bullshit functions like libraries (that virtual directory crap), the included media player and all that other crap.

      But when "I don't want to use this part" became "I don't want to use it but I can't be sure anymore whether it gets sneaked behind my back" this whole business turned into outright hostility towards the user. And this may indeed be the moment to re-evaluate your application choice so that Windows is not a requirement anymore.

    17. Re:Install Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a marine electrician

      As you are a marine, you should be concerned about how much of your ability to function as an armed force

      [laughs]

      Marine: (adj) Of, or pertaining to, the sea (marine biology, marine insurance.)

  21. And I want a unicorn... by JacobA.Munoz · · Score: 1

    "They use Windows at work or school, and don't want to go through the process of learning another OS"..

    So, in other words - they are lazy. Sorry, I have no sympathy for them - if they're not willing to learn, just take their computer away. They're asking you to do something you can't, and probably shouldn't waste your time bothering to. They can't be bothered to learn how to use a secure OS, so why are you trying to bend time and space around to make them happy? Show them how to use Linux Mint, it's NOT that hard - their heads won't explode. And if they continue to complain that they "don't get it, and want windows back", do yourself a favour and hand them the install CD and walk away... Sometimes you need to just let people deal with their own computer problems. We all know for a fact that Microsoft will not be going out of their way to make you and your family happy, so get a different product.

    1. Re: And I want a unicorn... by JacobA.Munoz · · Score: 1

      Sorry Anonymous Coward - but I did, and my 66 year old dad is perfectly happy and prefers it to Win 7. So, yes it is a realistic scenario, and I'm very sorry that you weren't able to understand how to use a standard desktop OS in 2015.. Maybe you should call my 92 year old grandma for tech help.. She's using Linux Mint "en Espanol!!" :)

    2. Re: And I want a unicorn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux users don't think that's a realistic scenario either, which is why popular desktop distributions have been shipping with graphical package managers for well over a decade. Many of the modern ones are on par with "app stores" in terms of usability.

      If we are going to insist upon stereotypes here, those parents and grandparents probably won't be installing their own software anyway. If you are installing the software for them, why would they care if you are using a graphical installer or a command line utility?

    3. Re: And I want a unicorn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true MS shill, who obviously never used Linux - except for his cell phone, tablet and router of course...

      BTW, do you really think that the people who invented computers, rockets and spacecraft half a century before you were born, won't be able to use a modern computer?

  22. Huh by koan · · Score: 2

    First, if they are moving from 7 to 10 they are learning a new OS, and if they are on Win8 they have already been under the auto update yoke.

    Second, they are more likely locked into a program rather than a OS, consider what it is they have to run on Windows, is there an equivalent in Linux?

    If so, the "learn a new OS" complaint (while valid) isn't as hard as they might think these days, there is a sort of "start button" and there is a menu and it should not be that difficult.

    The main thing I would stress, if they are on Win 7, is why update? Does it do what you want? Then leave it be and in time there will be a solution offered to make win10 more palatable for them.

    Too many people got caught up in the "free upgrade" and I already hear complaints on the gaming servers, lots of regret there and very few "it's better stories".

    The whole Win10 thing seems like MS making it easier for themselves while beating up and robbing their customers (of personal data).

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the biggest problem in linux is upgrading is difficult:

      - fedora: i need to support every 6 months to do a transition. or the computer ends up with a really old browser/libreoffice blah family/friends end up with a really old linux distro 2 years from now (office/web)

      - rolling release distros: too much breakage for your average joe.

      is there a distro that REALLY separates userland software updates from system updates? AKA: old stable kernel and drivers and no improvement in DE (old gnome/kde/whatyouwant) vs shiny new office environment (real userland)?

    2. Re:Huh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      First, if they are moving from 7 to 10 they are learning a new OS

      In what world? For the basic user very little at all has changed between 7 and 10. The interface looks a tiny bit different, "All Programs" is now called "All Apps" in the start menu but otherwise there's absolutely nothing about windows 10 that needs "learning".

      Windows 8 needed learning but they've backed off from that interface.

    3. Re:Huh by AntiSol · · Score: 1

      The machine I'm typing this on right now originally had Ubuntu 8.04 installed. It's now on 14.04. I have upgraded it each time a new LTS release has come out. I've upgraded 3 times in ~6 years and these were all more-or-less hassle-free. Nothing broke, all my software stayed intact.

      Another machine I upgraded from 8.04 32bit to 10.04 64bit without losing any user settings, though I did have to reinstall all my software. This was made easier by the fact that i use a separate partition for /home.

      Choose a distro with LTS releases. Upgrading every 6 months is insanity.

    4. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So small changes don't count, right?

      Based on your logic, they could just as easily switch to a Linux distro with a windows-lookalike theme.

      The interface looks a tiny bit different. "Control Panel" will be called something like "settings" or "preferences". Instead of "App Store", it's "Software Center".

    5. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The interface looks a tiny bit different, "All Programs" is now called "All Apps" in the start menu but otherwise there's absolutely nothing about windows 10 that needs "learning".

      Who uses "All Programs"? That folder should be named "Programs you haven't yet added a shortcut to, because you haven't used them yet".

      Now, how do I add shortcuts to the Windows 10 start menu? How about folders / sub menus?

  23. Little Snitch ... by swell · · Score: 0

    L.S. (also Hands Off!) is a small utility program that runs on Mac OS. It can prevent anything on your Mac from 'phoning home', even itself. No more annoyances of software auto-updating to bring you the latest adware or otherwise crippled updates. You can run Adobe, Apple and Microsoft software without their constant reports about your activities. It can prevent the many parts of OS-X from connecting to Apple's scores of internet resources ... Ah, but do you know what those BSD/OS parts are doing and why they are connecting? Not likely, so it may be best to let the operating system just do its thing.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  24. They need educatiing... by CaptainOfSpray · · Score: 3, Informative

    They "don't want to go through the process of learning another OS".

    What do they think moving to Win 10 will be like?

    Move them to Linux Mint Cinnamon, that's more like what they are used to than any of Win 7, Win 8, or Win 10.

    --
    "Cock Up Your Beaver" does not mean what you think. This sig is intended to clog filters and annoy do-gooders
  25. Too bad, so sad. by grub · · Score: 1

    If they come to you for advice and that advice is to ditch Windows, then you are not obligated to help them with support.

    I've taken that hardline approach for years and flat out refuse to help by saying, in essence, "I don't use it, I don't know it."

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Too bad, so sad. by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Being a retired admin, THAT is my advice to all who ask... Get the F**K OFF WINDOWS!! Linux is NOT hard....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    2. Re:Too bad, so sad. by ledow · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      I treat Apple products just like this. You chose to buy that stuff, if you asked me I would have told you not to, I could supply enough reasons to justify that claim, but yet you still went down that path.

      When I was self-employed, my mantra was "I charge prices relative to the amount of my advice that you ignored, and the amount of stupidity you deployed". It tended to work. When people made bad decisions, I charged a lot more for the cleanup and they learned not to make bad decisions (or to fix it themselves when they did).

      It's getting harder and harder to support MS stuff, especially for the home, and no matter how many times you tell people not to upgrade, they do it "just because" or "to get rid of the message". The fallout from that is their problem, as hard as that is. Especially if they've been warned about that, had those things happen in the past, etc.

      The longer I stay in IT, the less I want to deal with people's home problems. At first, I made a living just fixing people's PC's. Now I spend so much time fighting it as part of my job (with responsibility and liability should I not get it done right), that the last thing I want to do is sort out other people's PC's too.

      It's a sad state of affairs that computing is such a commercialised environment that it's got that bad, and that it's just not worth the time and effort to clean up.

      And though I use Windows at home, it's Windows 7, with updates disabled, behind a decent firewall to prevent accidental updates. And that's mostly for games and all the real work is inside VMWare VM's on that machine.

      Sorry, people. You've been trained into - and sold - a system which is being slowly turned into a cash cow under Microsoft / Apple's control. Home users will have to follow or deliberately do something different to everyone else. Businesses too. Remember all those times that your IT guys told you it didn't HAVE to be a Microsoft system but you were reliably informed by some business trade mag that it was the defacto standard and you couldn't live without it? This is the price.

      I actually still enjoy working on Linux systems. They do what I tell them. Of course, I don't have systemd and some other shit, including most of the modern GUI's, installed on them because the creep is even there too. But Windows I get to my config (which involves turning all this shit off), and then I leave it like that and don't tinker unless something breaks. It's a sad state of affairs.

    3. Re:Too bad, so sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who said linux was hard?...linux is useless for 99% of people using anything mainstream, yes there are linux version of most popular programs, but they are versions of not the exact same thing.

    4. Re:Too bad, so sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're an idiot.

    5. Re:Too bad, so sad. by spiffyspiff · · Score: 1

      you are spot on, 100% correct.

      Me? I've switched off updates on Win7 and run it in a VM with no network connection and only for Adobe CS6. End Of Story.

      It's a very sad state of affairs.

    6. Re:Too bad, so sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox and Libreoffice are identical on Windows and Linux which covers 99% of mainstream use. Namely, browsing Facebook and printing letters.

    7. Re:Too bad, so sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree with ledow. Why is he an idiot? Even for commercial use Windows it getting too hard to support. Install the same OS and applications on 10 boxes, and all 10 will have different problems. I have setup network booting, so every users has the option to run a fully working Linux image, until I have time to look at there latest Windows problem. The servers already run Linux, and most software is opensource. The Linux image comes with a lot more software thank most uses have on there local Windows drive. I also make regular images of the local Windows drive (for Linux). Disk-space is cheap and in case of problems I can just revert every sector on the drive to what it was a few weeks ago. User files should not be stored locally anyway.

    8. Re:Too bad, so sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And my advice to you is to go fuck yourself. Linux is certainly harder than Windows and OSX. Partly due to bad design and partly due to the lack of effort from volunteer staff. If that were the only problem, you'd see more people adopting Linux.

  26. I'm perfectely happy with Windows 7 by Psychotria · · Score: 1

    As far as Windows goes I am happy to tolerate it for the games that I play that do not have a Linux port yet. So there is no way in hell I am upgrading to 8 or 10.

    Using this: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-...

    I am fairly confident that those fuckers can't force something onto me I don't want (especially since I compiled it with TDM-gcc

    C:\Users\Pyshcotria\Code> checkversion.exe
    Windows10YoureFuckedOrGreater
    C:\Users\Pyshcotria\Code>

    Seems fine

  27. Linux - forced updates?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But isn't systemd a forced update that fixes problems that didnt exist, and introduces a new set of operational challenges?

    1. Re:Linux - forced updates?? by present_arms · · Score: 1

      Don't know, I don't run a systemd infected Linux

      --
      http://chimpbox.us
    2. Re:Linux - forced updates?? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Sure, and if you don't like that behavior, find a distribution that doesn't jam it down their user's throats. There are plenty that didn't. A lot of them aren't as shiny as some of the distributions that did, but that's also a trade off you make, isn't it?

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    3. Re:Linux - forced updates?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what, no distribution is forced to please you with everything you want or don't want. People spend their time doing stuff they want, and if they don't offer the exact combination of free software packages that you want then (seriously) go and make your own distro that does. They don't owe you anything. You can sit here and complain all day long that all the distros are "forcing" systemd on you. No, they do what they want to do and you either accept it or you don't. If they don't want to spend their time making their distro work without systemd then that's their decision.

    4. Re:Linux - forced updates?? by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      For me, it's been an optional update that fixes minor problems, and hasn't introduced any challenges. But I'm foolish enough to run boring-old Debian instead of whatever hot, new flavor of the month is out there. Debian made the glibc transition painless while the rest of the Linux world was screaming, and they seem to be doing the same with systemd.

    5. Re:Linux - forced updates?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Few of us, particularly the more advanced users, want to play the distro hopping game. Linux sucks. The kernel, yeah, it's adequate, but the actual desktop environment is still like a partially aborted fetus.

    6. Re:Linux - forced updates?? by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      Obviously not running testing...

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    7. Re:Linux - forced updates?? by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Funny, that's exactly what I am running.

      (If you're referring to the recent libg++5 transition, that was a little tricky, I admit. I had to stop doing updates for a while, till things got sorted out, but that only seemed to take about a week. And had nothing to do with systemd.)

    8. Re:Linux - forced updates?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isn't systemd a forced update...

      There are no *forced* updates for any Linux distro.

    9. Re:Linux - forced updates?? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that's true. Last year I was in a job that was maintaining some decades-old X11 apps. Shit honestly hasn't improved since when those apps were written. There are still half a dozen or so competing widget sets, all of which suck (Yes, Even Qt, although Qt sucks a good bit less than everything else I looked at.) If you're concerned about performance sending graphics across a network, there are two or three X11 extensions to do things like double buffering and pixmap caching. They mostly seem to be unmaintained and undocumented. And nearly everything is written in moldy old C.

      And yes, I could start a widget set project or something to try to rectify the situation, and then we'd have one more competing widget set that probably sucks. The programming's really not that hard once you start learning your way around the various tools, but it is pretty tedious and writing even a widget set is a fairly large undertaking with no guarantee anything you do will ever be adopted by anyone.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  28. Re:is this an article or quesiont ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I did was to uninstall the update that pushes the Windows 10 notification, can't recall which KB it was, but you'll find it.
    Then I found out that Microsoft pushed the spying software of Windows 10 through updates to Windows 7 and Windows 8 too.

    Forbes had a simple guide to how you get rid of them.

    Doesn't prevent Microsoft form putting out new updates that pushed Windows 10 or spies on you.

  29. You want to use Windows in a manner that... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ... Microsoft does not want you to use Windows. ... FAIL

  30. Zorin OS for Windows users by nickweller · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Zorin OS is a multi-functional operating system designed specifically for Windows users who want to have easy and smooth access to Linux."

    1. Re:Zorin OS for Windows users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Doesn't support HiDPI. Out of luck on 4k monitors. Tried it two days ago :-(

    2. Re:Zorin OS for Windows users by nickweller · · Score: 1

      What a coincidence ..

  31. Extreme perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have several Win7. We created a domain with server 2012. We keep the server off most of the time. We get updates through windows updates, however Ms doesn't push win10 to it's corporate (DOMAINED) customers.
    Hope that helps!

    1. Re:Extreme perhaps by ledow · · Score: 1

      No. But it does push Windows 8.0 and 8.1 update prompts still. And "security" updates to improve their telemetry on those systems still. And all kinds of junk masquerading as a necessary update.

      Honestly, I have to decline more updates than I accept, especially when you include the application updates too.

      I don't see the solution to MS forcing an option you don't want and they could easily provide ways for you to exclude as being to use more of their software on more machines.

  32. Are security updates really necessary? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    I found throughout the decades that the best computer security is provided by using common sense and being informed on things related to computers. While security updates are mandatory for most people (I guess), I think there are people who can get by just using their knowledge of IT and common sense. In any case, this has worked for me my whole 40+ years long life, more than half of it involved with computer tech.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  33. The early days on win update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we are going back to the win2000 era? Doing a 15-year-step back?

    Its like being in the early days of win update, where like every other update bricked your PC - the only solution was to completely turn off winupdate.

    M$ forcing ppl to some shit. ppl disable shit and in the long term ppl suffer, because some of the big pile of shit was actually a little useful and now they run a vuln machine and do not care.

  34. Corp version? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Can't you pick and choose updates with the corp version? Only home edition forces them on you.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Corp version? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can't you pick and choose updates with the corp version? Only home edition forces them on you.

      You can pick and choose updates in the home version, too. By default, you get all updates, including recommended ones. But you can tell it to just notify you and not download or install updates. Then you can run windows update manually, and click on each patch, then click the link for more info, then read about it in your web browser. If you don't want an update, you can hide it in windows update, and it will no longer appear and you will no longer be nagged to install it. All very straightforward, except that useful patch descriptions aren't actually given in the windows update app, you have to keep going to the browser. And microsoft will no longer give you that information without enabling javascript for their domain, their basic site functionality now requires javascript, either because they want to run malicious code on your PC or because they are completely incompetent and forgot how to put content into a webpage without javascript, take your pick.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Corp version? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I don't have much experience with Windows 10 yet, but I installed the "Enterprise" version on a VM at work last week and it doesn't seem to allow picking and choosing of updates, at least when operating as a standalone workgroup machine.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  35. Windows 10 wasn't complete by JimDarkmagic · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 as released in June 2015 wasn't complete. They were probably trying to rush it out for back to school or some other milestone date because their original launch period was fall. They're adding missing features and fixing broken features that shipped with RTM code. Windows is never "done" - they always refine shipped features, add security updates, and add new features as the tech market develops over time, but 10 didn't even meet the "done" of past releases. MS would figure out what features to add to the OS and work on it until all those features were in; maybe not perfect but, all there. Win 10 didn't even match that, where the missing features are being released at the end of the year in a "Threshold 2" update. And those TH2 features will probably be half-baked too, requiring more stability updates. But that, along with the "you take all the updates because we said so and no, we won't give you patch notes," is part of Windows as a Service. Like modern video games, you get a mostly functional product on disc that requires a lot of patching on day 1 and maybe a multi-player mode to be added later.

  36. Re:is this an article or quesiont ?! by gonz · · Score: 1

    It's a question without a good answer. There doesn't appear to be a "permanently prevent Windows 10 upgrade" switch anywhere.

    If someone made a tool that lets me use Windows 10 with security updates but without spying or cloud or unwanted upgrades, I would pay for that. I don't see any technical reason why a 3rd party can't provide that. When Windows 8 messed up the start menu, tools like Classic Shell stepped in to fill the gaps, with huge popularity, and I think those download statistics were actually persuasive to the "data driven" business strategizers at MS.

  37. WSUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't know why this got modded down. It is a pretty good solution.

    Many people would probably balk at the domain recommendation, but you don;t have to join a domain. You can point workgroup computers at WSUS as well. These computers get their updates solely from WSUS and you can pick and choose which updates to push.

    But, there's probably other ways as well. I haven't looked into exactly how it works, but Microsoft is not pushing the Windows 10 offerings to Windows 7 Pro computers joined to a domain, even without WSUS.

    What I'm seeing is that the corporate, domain joined, machines don't get the telemetry updates or the Windows 10 updates offered to them at all. So, there's probably a registry change that would cause Windows Update to skip you personal machine for Windows 10 roll out.

    1. Re: WSUS by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      It's basically saying roll your own windows distro.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re: WSUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The downside here is the $550 price of the Server license they'll need to run WSUS.

    3. Re: WSUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P2P + official hashes from MSDN available to everybody + vlmcsd.

      Pirating a server OS is pretty much a no-brainer when MS fucked up your desktop THAT badly that you have to. Fuck them.

  38. Windows all the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have made the mistake to put them on Windows. And you will have to play by the rules. When you use Windows you have surrendered your computer and the way you use that computer to Microsoft. The only advice I can give you is to just follow some Yoga course to release your anger, or to make the switch to a more free and open alternative.

  39. MBSA, some scripting, wget by vbraga · · Score: 1

    Download MBSA, run it every night, check the missing patches, download and install them.

    MBSA => "The Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer provides a streamlined method to identify missing security updates and common security misconfigurations. MBSA 2.3 release adds support for Windows 8.1, Windows 8, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Windows Server 2012. Windows 2000 will no longer be supported with this release." (http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=7558)

    Get it, write some PowerShell to run it, parse the XML it generates and install the missing patches. This allows for minimal, security-only, updates.

    --
    English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    1. Re:MBSA, some scripting, wget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent, I'll give Grandma a call and tell her to whip up a quick script to do that. Then no more support calls from her...thanks!

  40. Is your family short on disk space? by garethjrowlands · · Score: 1

    Unless your family is really short on disk space, downloading Windows 10 is not a problem. Your family does not have to install it - that's different to downloading. If they install it sometime in the next year, it will still be free. Even now, it is faster and more secure than 7. My guess is it'll soon be more stable also.

    1. Re: Is your family short on disk space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "[Windows 10] Even now, it is faster and more SECURE than 7."

      How much does Microsoft pay you and does the NSA also send a check or is it straight from MS?

  41. Forced Upgrades In The Wild? by mrmunk · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen any forced upgrades in the wild. Not saying it doesn't happen but of the 150 or so Windows boxes on my network (about 70% Win7 and 30% Win8) I haven't seen a forced Win10 install - plenty of requests but no forces (some BYOD have upgraded and no issues yet). Just wondering what the settings are on those boxes that were forced and how the forced upgrade looks (acts). Anybody have that experience? And yes I would prefer an all Linux net but it's not going to happen with a slew of BYOD in use and the array of mandatory software in the industry that doesn't behave outside of Win.

  42. DisableGWX by Deathlizard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First off, If there's no reason not to upgrade other than FUD, then they should update. 7 only has a little more than 4 years left and is already in extended support and windows 8/8.1 interface is crap vs 10. If they're worried about being spied on stay with a Local account and don't setup a Microsoft account. It will only take the same telemetry that they've been doing since the customer experience program in vista, which you can then turn off. That being said MS shouldn't have started downloading the OS on PC's without explicit reservations but even that can be disabled.

    Easiest method to disable windows 10 from updating is to use the DisableGWX Policy setting. This site's Method 3 will walk you through setting the registry key. Microsoft Also has some other blocking methods as well.

    If you just want security patches from that point forward go to windows update settings and uncheck "give me Recommended updates the same way I receive important updates"

    1. Re:DisableGWX by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First off, If there's no reason not to upgrade other than FUD,

      Look, shill, Microsoft actively spying on users isn't FUD. It's not a fear, because they're doing it. It's not uncertainty, because they're doing it. And it's not doubt, because they're doing it.

      Easiest method to disable windows 10 from updating is to use the DisableGWX Policy setting

      That is not the question, which the summary makes obvious, since the poster mentioned Windows 10 attempting to install itself. Clearly they want to avoid Windows 10.

      If you just want security patches from that point forward go to windows update settings and uncheck "give me Recommended updates the same way I receive important updates"

      The problem, as I pointed out in the top comment in this thread, is that you cannot trust Microsoft not to put other things into "Security Updates". This is especially true on Windows 10 where they are providing less information about what is actually in patches than literally ever before, as pointed out by a comment in that part of this thread. So no, that doesn't work.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:DisableGWX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe your laptop drivers aren't Windows 10 compatible.

      Or your laptop overheats during the upgrade process

      Or your laptop doesn't have the spare harddrive.

      How many people have a laptop with two video cards, one low power and one high power?

    3. Re:DisableGWX by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      First off, If there's no reason not to upgrade other than FUD,

      FUD? ARS Technica is not known for publishing FUD.
      And here's a nice traffic analysis of what Windows 10 sends to Microsoft in its IP packets.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    4. Re:DisableGWX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most clear evidence that you're a Microsoft shill is the fact that you didn't even attempt to answer the question asked.

      I can only assume you spend the rest of your workday giving useless suggestions and marking them as answers on MSDN.

    5. Re: DisableGWX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer is:
      1) untick "Give me Recommended updates the same way I receive Important updates".
      2) Uninstall the update that installed GWX
      3) I you want to be really nice and future-proof, uninstall also all the recent telemetry and upgrade-related updates
      4) check for new updates
      5) hide all the updates you uninstalled

      That will NOT provide total security forever, and this will not disable all non-security updates. But for now and for observable future, that will get your relatives off you.

      Personally, I do not believe that Microsoft will ever push "offers" as security updates in Win7/8, but don't tell that to "theorists".

    6. Re:DisableGWX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ars Technica is Apple fanboy and will take any opportunity to shit on anything else that it can.

    7. Re:DisableGWX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Easiest method to disable windows 10 from updating is to use the DisableGWX Policy setting

      That is not the question, which the summary makes obvious, since the poster mentioned Windows 10 attempting to install itself. Clearly they want to avoid Windows 10."

      Actually it is the answer to the question. Just not stated well. If you follow the link you'll see the instructions are to remove the Upgrade to Windows 10 prompt / app; Thus Windows will stay at the current version installed on the machine.

  43. Six Installed Per Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're doing six installs per year? What kind of anecdote is this? In terms of business that doesn't even count as a statistical anomaly. Six installs per year literally nothing. I've done ~50 Windows 10 upgrades in the past two months and I don't regard that as a meaningful number.

    What kind of business does this sort of ultra low volume and has three staff members?

    1. Re:Six Installed Per Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Six installs per year literally nothing.

      No, ZERO installs per year is literally nothing.

    2. Re:Six Installed Per Year? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      What kind of business does this sort of ultra low volume and has three staff members?

      Nokia, Blackberry?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  44. LMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You people are like a sick parody of infowars, except everything they claim about Obama, you guys claim about Microsoft.

    Face it - there will ALWAYS be someone you feel inferior to and want to hide your insecurities from. Step one is to admit you have a problem and realize nobody cares about your porn browsing habits.

    Now as for being realistic - Windows 10 will not install itself if you don't tell it to. FFS, that is the most misguided interpretation of anything I've seen on Slashdot for weeks and is worthy of one of the independent-gamergate-neckbeard-spinoff news sites.

    You seem to have conflated "Windows 10 files preloading in the background" with "Bill Gates bogeymen will emerge from your closet and install Windows 10 through a virus-infected firmware update to your motherboard"

    Get a grip.

  45. Asking this community for help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in the same boat and would like a real answer as well.

    I purchased a computer with Windows 8.1. It's a productivity computer and therefore like to exercise some level of control over it. I would like to KEEP Windows 8.1 on it so that, if nothing else, I can avoid resolving incompatibilities in drivers and programs when I should be getting work done. I don't think that it's unreasonable for me to apply security patches to this version of Windows, as released by Microsoft, without being forced into a full OS upgrade.

    I manually install updates but immediately cancel when it says it's updating to Windows 10. This status may be a generic indicator and let me sidestep the real OS upgrade later in the process. I don't really want to find out.

    It figures that asking this question on Slashdot would get you any number of lectures on how you're getting what's coming to you and/or how switching to Linux would fix everything. Criticism, sure.. Help, no thanks!

    Best of luck. I think you're better off checking a dedicated Windows forum than asking here.

  46. WSUSOffline by Epsillon · · Score: 1

    Have a look at WSUS Offline. It does more or less what you're asking for, although you do have to run the collector and client manually every post patch Tuesday.

    --
    Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
    1. Re:WSUSOffline by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

      Exactly, this. It allows you to blacklist updates. You then create an update DVD which you use on the clients, or you start the updater from a network share.

      Or set up a WSUS server and do not approve the updates responsible for the W10 upgrade (of course not practical for a single private computer, but maybe an option for a school - although I'd hope you'd already have something like that running there...).

      Someone else created a script which disables all the currently known telemetry/W10 updates for the Windows online update service. Problem is that these updates sometimes get replaced by a newer update, so you'd have to add updates as they appear (by which time they might already have been automatically installed...).

      http://forums.mydigitallife.in...

      So some way of updating AFTER the patch day is better, I think.

    2. Re:WSUSOffline by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Have a look at WSUS Offline. It does more or less what you're asking for, although you do have to run the collector and client manually every post patch Tuesday.

      No, there is no more patch Tuesday. And also no, because you cannot trust Microsoft not to put spying or Windows 10 "upgrading" into a security patch.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:WSUSOffline by Epsillon · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes there is. September's happened just when it should have. I don't particularly care what they say about WinX, 7 still gets updates on patch Tuesday, which is what we're discussing here to stop the GetWinX crapware getting in.

      WSUSoffline is *NOT* WSUS. It's a custom set of scripts that automates download and installation of critical Windows patches that are deemed to be security essential by the WSUSoffline community. It even runs the collector on Linux - I have it set up as a cron job. You can blacklist patches by kb reference number if they make a mistake.

      The whole point was updating fresh installs before letting them go online. It accidentally created the ideal update method for dealing with this crap as a side-effect.

      --
      Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
  47. Forced upgrade? by bandwidthcrisis · · Score: 1

    Microsoft forcing the Windows 10 upgrade on people who don't want it

    That's was a forced download, but not a forced install, wasn't it? I'm still seeing that little icon waiting for me.

  48. I am Windoze free at last! by rajafarian · · Score: 1

    Have had it since WFW 3.11 in '95 and survived the many flavors of Winders so I could play games although I dual-booted with OS/2 then Linux. Steam has enough games to keep me busy for a long time. Bye bye M$!

  49. Windows 7 to Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, if they are moving from 7 to 10 they are learning a new OS

    In what world? For the basic user very little at all has changed between 7 and 10. The interface looks a tiny bit different, "All Programs" is now called "All Apps" in the start menu but otherwise there's absolutely nothing about windows 10 that needs "learning".

    To the extent that they're moving from Windows 7 to Linux, the learning curve may be less than that from Windows 7 to Windows 10. Things are less screwed up in the user interface, and probably more familiar to a Windows user.

    If they're moving to a KDE or xfce distribution, there might be a (very small) learning curve. It might take longer if there's a highly customized xfce configuration (as we have). Similarly for Gnome distributions. Of course, I agree that the learning curve for Unity is quite long, and might require as much as a whole hour. Oh, and you can change the user interface later, if you want.

    1. Re: Windows 7 to Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the learning curve for unity is very short. You use it for 5 minutes and you say "fuck this shit." Lesson learned.

  50. Suck it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's somewhere in the small print: you gotta suck it up.

    Or change your software provider. I've heard that this linux thing is better in that regard.

  51. something easy by spaceman375 · · Score: 1

    Give them each a fairly sizable usb stick. Make it boot linux with persistence. Linux mint or linux lite would be my choices. Set their computers to boot the usb stick first. If they have any problems, they can just pull the stick and have their windows back. Tell them the truth - Linux is free, has regular updates, is so unlikely to catch malware that people generally don't install anti-virus software, and is closer to what they are used to than windows 10 is. If it's a fear of changing brand names, the requisit car analogy would be along the lines of "When all you've driven is fords, switching to a chevy may be less painfull and more rewarding than you think."

    --
    On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
  52. Microsoft already has a solution for this... by sweet+'n+sour · · Score: 2

    Microsoft has two versions of Windows 10 for volume license users: CB and LTSB.

    CB (Current Branch) is the same as what the home users have to deal with.
    LTSB (Long Term Service Branch) however does things differently.

    "For example, systems powering hospital emergency rooms, air traffic control towers, financial trading systems, factory floors, just to name a few, may need very strict change management policies, for prolonged periods of time. To support Windows 10 devices in these mission critical customer environments we will provide Long Term Servicing branches at the appropriate time intervals. On these branches, customer devices will receive the level of enterprise support expected for the mission critical systems, keeping systems more secure with the latest security and critical updates, while minimizing change by not delivering new features for the duration of mainstream (five years) and extended support (five years)."

    Source: Windows 10 for Enterprise: More secure and up to date
    https://blogs.windows.com/busi...

    The only other solution I can think of would rely on setting up a WSUS server, and managing the updates from there. The OP would then just need to change some registry settings on his family's computers to point to his WSUS server for updates.

    Instructions: Configure Automatic Updates using Registry Editor
    https://technet.microsoft.com/...

  53. Re:Fail idea - I don't do Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I tell people that I don't do Windows. End of story. If they want me to help them, then they have to start by buying/installing a quality system, be it Apple, Linux or BSD. If they insist on using Windows crapware, then they are on their own. I don't want to waste my time with it, for the same reason that I don't want to maintain someone else's Trabant or 1960s VW Beetle.

  54. Re:Fail idea - I don't do Windows... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    So, in other words, because you're incompetent at Windows, Trabant, and 1960s VW Beetle.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  55. Just do it. by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    Hi. I'm mostly a Mac and Linux guy, but I have a Windows box I use for gaming. Windows 10 is a fine product: it's a nice extension of the Windows 7 experience, with better security, good speed, and some nice features. As you say you're not going to be able to get your family off Windows, they should be running 10, with all the updates. Trying to stick with 7 (or god forbid, XP), they'll have more incompatibility issues going forward rather than less, and picking and choosing Windows updates is more trouble than it's worth.

    If you tell them to buck the trend and set up something weird, they're going to ask you to deal with the consequences.

    1. Re:Just do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the beauty of Linux you can run it off of usb and dvd's. Windows enterprise has the "Windows to Go" but you need 16GB stick to do so but there are some limitations. Not a fan of linux being internet dependent but I can always use open source tools to create my own Distro with all updates and applications that are already installed.

    2. Re:Just do it. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 is going to get security fixes until some time after I need to replace my laptop. Moreover, lots of people are sticking with Windows 7, which means that software and hardware vendors are going to have to support it for a long time. There's absolutely no rush to move off 7.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  56. How to disable GWX and Telemetry by Yer+Mum · · Score: 4, Informative

    The three registry keys to disable GWX and the GWX advert in Windows Update are these...

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\GWX]

    "DisableGwx"=dword:00000001

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate]

    "DisableOSUpgrade"=dword:00000001

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\WindowsUpdate\OSUpgrade]

    "ReservationsAllowed"=dword:00000000

    Then open an elevated command prompt (search for cmd in the start menu, right click and Run as Administrator) and uninstall the following telemetry KBs...

    wusa /uninstall /kb:3068708 /norestart
    wusa /uninstall /kb:3022345 /norestart
    wusa /uninstall /kb:3075249 /norestart
    wusa /uninstall /kb:3080149 /norestart

    In Control Panel > Windows Update > Change Settings, untick "Give me recommended updates the same way as I receive important updates" as some optional updates have been used to send down unwanted GWX/Telemetry updates.

    Also in Control Panel > Windows Update, search for updates, then view the optional ones, then hide three of those KBs above (3022345 shouldn't appear as it's superseded) by right-clicking on them and choosing the hide option.

    Now reboot the computer, search for CEIP in the start menu, run it, and change the setting to disable telemetry to MS.

    If the C:\$WINDOWS.~BT then your computer is downloading Windows 10 in the background. Search for CleanMgr in the start menu and run it to remove the "Windows Update temporary files" category. Although that may unhide those three KBs above and you many need to rehide them.

    Telemetry info from http://www.ghacks.net/2015/08/28/microsoft-intensifies-data-collection-on-windows-7-and-8-systems/

    Unless MS send a recommended update which adds more GWX or Telemetry stuff to Windows 7/8, your extended family's computers will look after themselves from now on.

  57. oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not yet a fan of Linux or BSD but slowly becoming one. Yes, everything runs on windows, but, see what type of programs they need and maybe there are some alternatives on Linux or BSD Distro's. Or they could run Windows(no internet access) as guest under Linux(internet access) VM Host and I'm thinking about doing the same thing.

  58. OS patches are over-rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a relative who is still using Windows XP. He restricts his browsing to reputable sites and has his Windows Firewall activated in addition to being behind a router which protects him from direct intrusions from outside the home network as well as from within.

    OS patches are necessary for school (esp. post secondary), work and other 'public' environments (laptops at cafes etc)

    Beyond that, it's overkill. The majority of home compromises come from attempts at viewing pornography, downloading pirated software and being tricked by false system scanners running in a browser window convincing the operator to download something to fix a non-existent problem.

    Education is the best tool. I've been using PCs for 30 years without anti-virus software, from MS-DOS, through WinDOS (9x/ME) and the NT/modern Windows kernel based systems. Though once in a while I'll download software, run a scan, find out I have nothing and remove the anti (virus/malware/etc) software.

    1. Re:OS patches are over-rated by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I prefer to use a computer where it is safe to view porn sites.
      You can get owned by a html mail or an advertisment on a trusted website.

  59. Re:What about China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Write off the country with the largest pirated Windows install base? What exactly are they writing off?

  60. Just hide the update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this even a serious submission? Have you ever used a computer before?

  61. Agreed, decent piece of work... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: It's pretty ok & does the job well enough!

    * Personally, I'd like it better were it GUI, but character mode/DOS mode/tty (whatever you want to call it) works...

    APK

    P.S.=> The dev keeps up on it too, regularly updating it as is needed (another nice thing)... apk

  62. Re:Make Windows Update Install Only Security Updat by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    Isn't what the settings in the "Windows Update" control panel are for? Have "important updates" install automatically, and don't tick the "recommended updates" check box.

  63. Re:is this an article or quesiont ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone made a tool that lets me use Windows 10 with security updates but without spying or cloud or unwanted upgrades, I would pay for that

    For that matter, if Microsoft offered Win10 with a Win7 upgrade policy (user-controllable, individual updates can be deferred, and all telemetry including error reporting can be turned off), I'd pay a premium for that. As of now, the closest thing is Enterprise LTSB, and it's not available for purchase by individuals. How fucked up is that?

  64. Simple Solution - Borrow Linux YUM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically the "Inmates are running the Asylum at Microsoft right now.."

    So do what Linux did.. [disable, cripple, hobble, remove Windows Update].. begin downloading and "vetting" or certifying the legitimacy of individual Windows Patches and put them in a distributed "repository" system.. put the choice back in the hands of the people.

    There is already a system for doing thing.. like DNS.. "people" not "marketing droids at Microsoft"... long ago began work on something Microsoft tries to emulate today.. a [Package Manager] and a ssytem for distributing and applying packages [YUM].

    Then you can do so many things Microsoft is still trying to play catchup on.. like ensuring 'dependencies are met'.. like roll fowards, backwards.. rebuilding.. chain of authority.. versioning for architectures.. personal repositories.. business repositories.. optional repositories in addition to primary..

    This "Ring STUID.. Ring LUDRICIOUS" stuff is just Microsoft trying to copy Linux.. plain and simple.

    Its time to just [stop] Microsoft from running (ruining?) things.. and take back control.

  65. They have lied before... by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    I believe that, in the past, Microsoft lied about certain updates as to whether they were vital security updates or not,
    They could just as easily lie in the future and force down something that helps them keep a better eye on us but label it as vital security.

    Any non-IT person would normally be well advised to have the system automatically install security updates. Those of us who are may have to trust MS as our particular area of expertise does not include what "this" update is supposed to fix. Does everyone here check everything anyway? Life is busy...

    I have come across so many idiots who think that all you need is education and caution and you don't need A/V. Please keep it up guys. it's sometimes really funny.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:They have lied before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Windows 10 update is in the optional updates category (not automatically downloaded), the people complaining are blaming Microsoft for their inability to read when they clicked on "select all" in Windows Update.

  66. I just gave up on those who didn't convert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need help? Too bad. It's your own undoing. I don't touch Microsoft Windows and know nothing about it. Linux Mint Cinnamon isn't exactly significantly different conceptually and if nearly everybody around me has converted to one version of Linux or another certainly you can too.

  67. Not happy with 10 by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

    I installed 10 on a laptop. When setting up it gives an option to opt out of auto update. But... auto updates anyway. What scares me is that I learned long ago not to install most optional updates. Video drivers usually don't work. Lan drivers usually don't work. For the lan, you have to dig out the mobo software and reinstall it. Then get on line to get video drivers. Not fun.

    As far as the 8 metro screen. How is it, after all this time, no one seems to know how or even that you can shut it off. I didn't like it. I disabled it. The only thing 8 screwed up, IMO, is the start menu. Which classic start fixed. Of course, 10... removed it. So here we go again.

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  68. Security from Who? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1, Informative

    The only real way to protect yourself is external to Microsoft software, such as at the router. The router will not know if it is a security update or a simple "lets beta test the next release on the non-commercial chumps" software release. But the real issue is who are you concerned about security protection from? The only evil doers who have ever done me real harm are Microsoft themselves, back in XP SP1 days they rewrote my NIC EEPROM during a "security update" so that it would come up in an illegal default state and not work properly in Linux (and temporarily reset the NIC state to ordinary defaults when Windows was booted). I have to question who I'm trying to protect my system from, and the biggest evil out there seems to be Microsoft. So I no longer accept any Microsoft "security updates".

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  69. Use Enterprise version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If staying on Windows is a must, simply get the Enterprise version. It allows to manage the updates the updates the way it was in Windows 7.

  70. Re:is this an article or quesiont ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0) Set up Windows 10 with local accounts, not a MS Account. Use OneDrive (if you must) over a browser connection rather than by direct access in Windows. Go through Windows preferences (in any version, but especially 10) to turn off whatever communication you don't need. Your Internet usage will drop dramatically. Understand that there's a small chance MS will ignore or override some of those settings at one time or another, so check them occasionally, but don't panic.
    1) When using Windows 10 (also 8 and 7, if you're paranoid enough), simply disconnect from the network or use "airplane mode" when not doing something that requires network or internet access. Use non-MS stand-alone (not cloud-connected) software where feasible.
    2) With Win 7 at least, you should be able to set up firewall rules that prevent access to or from known MS collectors. Should also work in 8 and 10, but may be better hidden. Yes, that works only as long as MS doesn't change the name or address, but it works until then.
    3) If you need access to the internal network, such as for a shared printer or access to a local server, block the MS collector addresses at the Internet access point's firewall.
    4) Switch to Linux. Understand that a whole different set of tweaks will be needed, and some Windows stuff simply will not work there even with shims like Wine. And with most flavors of Linux you will have to take care of yourself rather than having Big Mama Microsoft to lean on (if you dare). And Linux changes faster than Windows (no more install XP and use forever).

    TANSTAAFL

  71. As easy as pie. by westlake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What do they think moving to Win 10 will be like?

    A piece of cake?

    In Steam's August Hardware and Software Survey,16% of Steam gamers were running 64 Bit Win 10, a bare 0.92% Linux. Steam Hardware and Software Survey: August 2015

    Worldwide usage of Windows 10 in its first calendar month (August) was 4.9% compared to 1% for Windows 8 and 4.1% for Windows 7 after their first complete month.

    Windows 10 first month worldwide usage well ahead of that recorded by Windows 8

    1. Re:As easy as pie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Your figures don't support your thesis.

    2. Re:As easy as pie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That has more to do with lack of knowledge that there's an alternative than not. Windows 10 for Steam's not exactly a good thing for Valve, mind. Microsoft's been trying to cut off their air supply for a bit now. Now why aren't they flogging alternatives? They are- the thing is, the preferred one there wasn't ready until right around now anyhow.

  72. FYI: List of Win10/Telemetry updates by Beeftopia · · Score: 2

    Just an FYI, as this is a Windows update thread which is trying to avoid Win10 nagware + telemetry. These are the updates I've identified so far. Feel free to add/update the list:

    KB 2952664
    Compatibility update for upgrading Windows 7
    https://support.microsoft.com/...

    KB 2976978
    Compatibility update for Windows 8.1 and Windows 8
    https://support.microsoft.com/...

    KB 3022345
    Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry
    https://support.microsoft.com/...

    KB 3035583
    Update installs Get Windows 10 app in Windows 8.1 and Windows 7 SP1
    https://support.microsoft.com/...

    KB 3068708
    Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry
    https://support.microsoft.com/...

    KB 3075249
    Update that adds telemetry points to consent.exe in Windows 8.1 and Windows 7
    https://support.microsoft.com/...

    KB 3080149
    Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry
    https://support.microsoft.com/...

    1. Re:FYI: List of Win10/Telemetry updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many more http://techne.alaya.net/?p=124...

    2. Re:FYI: List of Win10/Telemetry updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that the list of KB items is constantly in flux, I've noted on fresh win7 installs that the updates to watch for and block have been retired and re-released with new numbers several times, with new telemetry ones added to boot, and indeed the KB descriptions are even more fuzzy about what they do then they used to be. "updates for windows update" used to say that it was to allow upgrading to win10, now they've obfuscated the language so you think you need it and even towed that line that the update is something you want including fixes when directly asked in product blogs.

  73. Just let it go by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

    I think you've misread the article you're linking to. All the article said is that it download ~5gb into a folder as part of the update. And leaves it there. Does nothing with it unless the user specifically chooses to click the "upgrade" button.

    Your family aren't being guinea pigs. The worst they'll get is ~5gb less space on their hard disks. Heck, they've probably got more than that in their recycle bin and system restore points and so on. Totally not worth investing your time to prevent this.

    1. Re:Just let it go by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they are guinea pigs.

      they are guinea pigs for knowing if people will install it by accident more easier if the data file is already on the computer and the user gets spammed with UPGRADE UPGRADE button.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  74. If you haven't noticed by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    Windows is kill.

    By fucking up the one thing they did correctly, all of Windows is now on a very short fuse. Everyone was expecting 10 to be 7 but better. Instead it's some cloud bullshit auto updating ad serving key logging pile of shit.

    You're fucked if you want to game, you're fucked if you aren't a computer wizard. Fucked fucked fucked. My recommendation to family is frigging "buy a Mac". My recommendation to those good at computing is, start ramping up a Linux distro that you can get your games to run under, or buy a PC for gaming that uses Xbox OS aka Windows 10 and do nothing else on it, and a Linux box for all actual computing. That's the same advice for anyone with a Windoze-need- the plethora of applications that refuse to support non-shit OSes, if you need them professionally, should be done on a Windows computer that knows nothing of your email or browsing and god forbid anything else.

    It didn't need to come to this. But Microsoft persists.

  75. Re:Fail idea - I don't do Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incompetence first requires the desire to succeed at something.

  76. Re:Fail idea - I don't do Windows... by MyAlternateID · · Score: 1

    Incompetence first requires the desire to succeed at something.

    Incompetence is the desire to continue doing something without improvement after discovering you have no skill at it.

  77. Alternatives by Trogre · · Score: 1

    If you don't like the idea of being screwed over then perhaps Windows 10 is not for you.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  78. "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: It's YOU vs. myself, here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (Always a pleasure making a weasel like YOU run like the scared little weasel you are...)

    "Incompetence is the desire to continue doing something without improvement after discovering you have no skill at it." -

    You're not very good @ trolling, even stooping so low as to TRY to talk behind my back -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    APK

    P.S.=> Truer words were NEVER spoken on /. & you help prove my point... apk

    1. Re:"Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"... apk by MyAlternateID · · Score: 1

      See subject: It's YOU vs. myself, here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      * :)

      (Always a pleasure making a weasel like YOU run like the scared little weasel you are...)

      "Incompetence is the desire to continue doing something without improvement after discovering you have no skill at it." -

      You're not very good @ trolling, even stooping so low as to TRY to talk behind my back -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      APK

      P.S.=> Truer words were NEVER spoken on /. & you help prove my point... apk

      You're funny.

    2. Re:"Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just started posting here 8/27/2015 plus the name you use? You're a sockpuppet. A karma farming little scumbag to gain modpoints to abuse the moderation system here with as well as a coward you pitiful little shit.

  79. But when I buy new hardware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it comes with Windows installed from the factory. Last time this laptop came with windows 8.1. I overwrote that OS with Ubuntu after accidently starting Win 8 once. I had to go into the BIOS manager and change the boot from UEFI to BIOS, then it was a snap.

    I have a spare hard drive from one laptop, a friend suggested buying a dupe drive, swapping out the drive with Windows on it, then installing Linux Mint, which worked pretty well, but wasn't moving forward as fast as Ubuntu seemed to.

    But MS might notice that some of their windoze sales don't EVER ask for any updates... to me that means they have been wiped. I worked in a fairly big IT shop for many years - we ran Oracle DB on Hardware that was built and sold with MS Server installed, but our DBAs overwrote that with Red Hat, and then installed Oracle on the servers. Much more reliable than MS products. Bullet proof. Updates went on the test boxen, and didn't go the production until there were no detectable problems.

    That doesn't mean no problems could slip through to production, but it shifted the odds severely in favor of stability. Most problems we encountered were from Netware upgrades in the networking area, because the networking guys thought they didn't need to follow standard testing protocols. But when one regional office can't use a production system after a network "upgrade" and all the other offices are OK, guess what is to blame for that failure? Yes, the network change.

  80. It's not "Your" Computer Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you install Windows on "your" computer, you effectively make it property of Microsoft.

    Microsoft can decide when to install updates, what updates to install, what data to send, how much disk space you can use, etc.

    In short, Microsoft can do whatever it wants to its computer. It just allows you to use it as and when Microsoft sees fit.

    Ever wonder why the "My Computer" icon is now just "Computer"?

    Eventually, you will pay a small monthly fee for your computer access. The small monthly fee would allow you a certain amount of storage, cpu usage, etc.

    Welcome to the mainframe era, and dumb terminals. Everything old is new again.

    1. Re:It's not "Your" Computer Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, in Windows 10 it is now called "My PC".

    2. Re:It's not "Your" Computer Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or "This PC"

  81. Re:What about China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are no "pirated" copies of windows 10 - IT IS FREE.
    MS needs the hundreds of millions of Chinese computer users.
    AND they will deal with the devil when required.
    For example, it looks like they have already agreed to replace
    BING with BAIDU.
    http://blogs.windows.com/bloggingwindows/2015/09/23/windows-10-in-china/
    MS already provides China with Win 10 source.
    Will China be allowed to veto updates?

  82. A vote for WSUS by halfabee · · Score: 1

    WSUS is the way to go. I've used WSUS in a lot of AD domain environments, but you don't need a domain to deploy WSUS: https://technet.microsoft.com/... With WSUS you can cherry-pick and approve updates individually. You can also easily write auto-approval rules for precisely what you're looking for (If update is of type "Security Update", then Approve).

    --
    -- Halfabee
  83. You need to throw them to the wolves by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is going to get more effective at this each pass.

    Only losing lots of customers will stop this process from getting worse.

    It would be different if it were not spying on you and serving ads to you using your own bandwidth but it is.

    Best to throw your relatives to the wolves, let them develop a reasonable distain for microsoft and either go to apple or linux of some kind.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  84. Re:Fail idea - I don't do Windows... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    why do you help with them with the shitfest that is osx? you don't get tired of not being able to help people adjust their base font and button sizes?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  85. Re:noob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've discovered that iceweasel is a painfully limited web browser, firefox a slower, but about as painful web browser, and if I want to use a web browser with snap, I'm stuck using a closed source browser that is bundling all sorts of information about me to corporations and the NSA. You can't win, you can't lose, you can't break even.

  86. uhh... by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Windows update isn't forcing you to update to Windows 10, so if you are installing Windows 10, then it's a user who has clicked on a message to install Windows 10....

    1. Re:uhh... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      After Microsoft and vendors have spent a long, long time training people to click through any message box to get stuff to work.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  87. WSUS by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    I run a WSUS in a 2012 VM, and I have all Windows 10 unchecked. All my boxes use it for updates. But the boxes are all Windows 7 Enterprise, and I don't think that will get pushed to Windows 10 as it's a valid MSDN corp key. Theoretically you could set up your own WSUS and punch a hole in your firewall, use a static / dynDNS ip so and write up a REG key that points at your server and give this out to your relatives.

    Good luck with all that!

  88. easy: 2 steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn off automatic updates, then run this batch file
    https://github.com/WindowsLies/BlockWindows

    Optional 3rd step: manually block the HOSTS entries that are also shown at the above page.

  89. Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the year of Linux on the Desktop! (tm)

    Oh. Wait.

    Well, maybe Apple will let you buy OSX to install on consumer-grade computers that aren't Macs...

    Oh...wait...

  90. Virtual Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only safe way to run Microsoft software, is inside a virtual machine.

    That way, disk access, network access, and even memory access can be tightly controlled.

    I find MSFT software actually performs better inside a VM, since the hardware is much simpler. The OS as a result, is less crash prone.

    For my Windows 10 VM, I disable network access, give it access to another virtual disk that holds only the files I need to edit at one time. After I'm done working, the disk is rsync'd to to the Linux partition, the files cleaned, stripped of MSFT meta-data, and the VM reset.

    That way, MSFT can collect whatever info it likes, basically, to the telemetry system, I've never really used the OS.

  91. BS by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    Too busy to read all the replies to see if someone called out your FUD. Microsoft won't update your system to windows 10 on it's own.

    Your reading of {some internet nerd}'s advice is incorrect. Unless you are on a metered connection, and a few extra GB of download is going to cause you so much grief that it's worth spending time on it, then you have nothing at all to do, and you won't have Windows 10 installed.

    Really, is reading comprehension so hard?

  92. I like Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I upgraded a few weeks ago, and I find it to be faster than even Windows 7 (had 8.1 on my personal laptop before...it could be a dog.)

    That said, the only easy way I know of to manage updates are installed and which aren't is to use WSUS, but I'm pretty sure it requires controlled machines to be members of an Active Directory, so not sure if that is feasible in your scenario.

  93. The Block the download folder [$Windows.~BT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Delete the Windows 10 download folder C:\$Windows.~BT and replace it with a locked file of the same name.
    Grant full access to a non-administrator user and then remove ALL access rights to System and Administrator groups.

    When Windows tries to re-download the Windows 10 installer, the download will fail.

  94. Windows 10 Professional has a “Defer upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 10 Professional has a “Defer upgrades” options, which I believe will be the best option at this point.

    "Home users can’t delay upgrades at all, but Professional editions of Windows 10 get a “Defer upgrades” option in the Advanced options interface. If you enable this, you’ll still receive security updates automatically. Windows 10 will put off downloading feature updates for several months until they’ve had plenty of time to be tested on home PCs.

    This is designed to make business PCs a bit more stable and allow system administrators to test new feature updates before they reach their users. If you upgrade to Windows 10 Professional, you could enable this option yourself. But, either way, you’ll get those feature updates — it will just happen a few months later."

    Source: http://www.howtogeek.com/223068/what-you-need-to-know-about-windows-update-on-windows-10/

  95. Facebook is not responding, FEDEX in Wall St area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just about to upload a video complaining to 7 11 about employees who claim they are under orders of an Arab leader and I identify them as nephews of a well known terrorist. Manged to comment privately to 7-11... then facebook ceased all replies, but Windows says it is online... what can you make out of it? Nope, this is no exaggeration, my personal safety depends on being connected ad in touch with people who can only contact me through Facebook.

  96. Re:Facebook is not responding, FEDEX in Wall St ar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great! It is going through! But not downloading fully yet.