Slashdot Mirror


From Microsoft, HoloLens VR Dev Kit, New Phones, Continuum

Ars Technica and scads of other tech hardware sites are reporting that the big news so far from this morning's Microsoft product launch event in New York is that the company's Hololens development kit will begin shipping in the first quarter of next year, and at a price that puts the units out of the hands of typical consumers: $3000. At that level, developers are more likely to make the plunge, which Ars applauds.

The company also announced three new smartphones: two of them, the Lumia 950, 950XL, are worth designating "flagships," while the 550, notably, will sell for $139, putting it in the territory of cheap grey-market Android phones. More interesting than spec bumps, though, is Continuum for Windows, a Window 10 feature which made its official debut at the event. Continuum is one manifestation of the pocket-computer idea that others have had as well in various forms: it means that with an adapter, a phone can be used as the CPU and graphics engine when connected to a screen and keyboard: "The adapter features a Microsoft Display Dock, an HDMI and Display Port, plus 3 USB ports to provide productivity on the go and let you plug in additional peripherals, such as mice and keyboards. Other accessories can be connected too, Microsoft said."

Microsoft also demo'd the Surface 4. Its improved screen is 12.3" at 2160x1440, for a pixel density of 267 PPI. The new pro has a Skylake 6th-gen processor, which they say provides a 30% performance boost over the Surface Pro 3, and a 50% boost over the MacBook Air. The SP4 goes up to 1TB of storage, and up to 16GB of RAM. The Type Cover was improved as well — the touchpad is 40% larger and supports 5-point multi-touch, while the keys have better travel and pitch.

On top of this, Microsoft also unveiled the Surface Book laptop. Its defining feature is that you can unclip the 13.5" touchscreen and use it separately as a tablet. The keyboard dock has a dedicated GPU that will boost performance when attached. Microsoft is using a new type of hinge that bends and extends at multiple points, so you can also reattach the screen backward if you want to use it as a tablet while keeping the extra GPU power available. They claim a 12-hour battery life for the Surface Book.

88 comments

  1. Real talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm hardly an MS fanboy, but I gotta admit it's pretty cool what they're capable of when they don't have to worry about flying chairs.

    1. Re:Real talk by JediJorgie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I hope you are a troll because the only other option is that your are completely ignorant of the HoloLens and its market.

      It is already a success as a pre-release device for engineering and data visualization. It is being used by MS partners today and many big companies have been waiting for it to be more widely available.

      Consumers are way down the list for HoloLens. The demo today was consumer focused because it was a consumer event, not because the HoloLens is anywhere near ready for the home user.

    2. Re:Real talk by SQLGuru · · Score: 2

      The $3k is for a devkit. I'm pretty sure that's a number that is high enough to thwart the problem of too many people ordering it and only serious inquiries for now. The consumer hardware will probably be a lot cheaper.

    3. Re:Real talk by JediJorgie · · Score: 1

      Well thank goodness we have you to point these things out to us. Now quit wasting our oxygen and start decomposing.

    4. Re:Real talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Hololens requires Malware 10. That's already too high of a price.

    5. Re:Real talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your opinion, shill.

    6. Re:Real talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's such a success - why don't Microsoft release a single video showing what it _actually_ looks like for the one who wears it? You now, with the narrow field of view, transparent objects etc.

      All videos released shows what the graphics look like rendered directly to the camera feed. That's nothing like wearing the real thing.

      Honest review here: http://doc-ok.org/?p=1223

    7. Re:Real talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the only way you can display a video that shows what it actually looks like is to give them a hololens.

      I overall agree with you that the current ads are misleading, but showing an overly shitty view on a 2D monitor would also be misleading.

    8. Re:Real talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing you need to know is that Hololens only draws graphics to a small box in the center of view. It's fucking lame.

    9. Re:Real talk by shione · · Score: 1

      fuck hololens. Show me the view the person wearing it sees.

      Showing videos of a computer generated 3rd person view (which is what all their videos are) is the most misleading thing ever because nobody EVER sees that view.

  2. Continuum - Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Got a SP3 and a docking station, but there have been numerous instances where the portability of my phone would be much better in order to move around and work. I may run VS2013 on my surface especially when onsite with my client, but for quick Office-type tasks, just a regular keyboard/mouse attached to a proper screen would be great.

    I guess I'm going to have to invest on a better KVM switch now.

    1. Re:Continuum - Finally by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is actually a nice innovation. I expect someone to come along and tell me there's an Android equivalent, since this is /. - but I have long wished my phone could function like a laptop - plug into a dock at work, into my home entertainment center at home... to be everything everywhere.

      A real innovation to me would not be more functions in the device itself - we already have more than you can count - but rather *eliminating devices*.

      Not just devices on my person like my watch or my keys or credit card, devices in my life - in my home, car, office, etc.

    2. Re:Continuum - Finally by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I've long predicted this was going to happen. It won't be long before you can temporarily pair your phone wireless over a KVM kiosk; walk away from a certain distance and it un-pairs securing your session. This would be perfect on an airplane where the screen in front of you is all you need.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Continuum - Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Captain Future. Any other hindsight predictions you'd like to share?

    4. Re:Continuum - Finally by macs4all · · Score: 2

      This is actually a nice innovation. I expect someone to come along and tell me there's an Android equivalent, since this is /. - but I have long wished my phone could function like a laptop - plug into a dock at work, into my home entertainment center at home... to be everything everywhere.

      Wasn't Motorola advertising just exactly that a couple of years ago?

    5. Re: Continuum - Finally by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      Nope. They did not advertise a Windows PC in your pocket.

      There was also Playbook which was the most poorly designed device ever.

      The only really bad part of this device is that it runs universal apps. I'm coding one now and am finding file system access poorly documented and confusing. Pretty sure I'll sort it out

    6. Re:Continuum - Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Captain Future

      Now that's a name I've not heard in a long time.

    7. Re:Continuum - Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, um, not Android but BlackBerry introduced USB host mode with the Z30 back in 2013. It allows you to plug into peripherals as described in the article, and it works very well.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_by44N9o50

    8. Re:Continuum - Finally by Digicrat · · Score: 1

      That was the LapDock which ran a (crippled) Desktop Linux distro when you put the phone in the dock. The dock itself supposedly was useful for turning Raspbery Pi's into fully functional laptops when they went on clearance, but unfortunately I broke my HDMI connector on the dock and only got to try that for a few minutes . . .

    9. Re:Continuum - Finally by macs4all · · Score: 1

      That was the LapDock which ran a (crippled) Desktop Linux distro when you put the phone in the dock. The dock itself supposedly was useful for turning Raspbery Pi's into fully functional laptops when they went on clearance, but unfortunately I broke my HDMI connector on the dock and only got to try that for a few minutes . . .

      Niiiice. (Not!)

      Things like that make you wonder how they ever get off the lab bench.

    10. Re:Continuum - Finally by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Ironically, I think Nokia was the first to propose something like this. They had a laptop-like thing that you could plug your phone into to turn the phone into a 'computer'. I don't think they ever brought it to market, though.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    11. Re:Continuum - Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the guy I was thinking of. Except I watched it in German when I was kid.

    12. Re:Continuum - Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived in England when Captain Future came out. It's too bad only about ten episodes ever got dubbed in English.

      I bet you also remember Ulysses 31.

  3. Continuum could be a big hit... by Junta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they went with Atom processors for the phones.. Without access to the library of existing x86 applications,Windows continues to fail to take advantage of their one key advantage, that dwindles more and more by the day.

    MS should have been pushing the x86 phone story *hard*. I was skeptical when Surface RT happened, and that did turn out to be a bust. MS should have learned from this. While continuum lays the groundwork for an interesting story, it falls short when paired with an ARM device with respect to MS ecosystem.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      The problem isn't the phones, or the platform, it is that they refused to cut off x86 support and go x64 only ... starting with Vista, 7 and Win 8.

      By cutting off support for x86, they could have been so much further down the road today. But they are too scared to push people off ancient technology. Which is why so many people are still there.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not so bad... with the Surface RT people went in expecting it to be like a Windows laptop that ran Windows software. Here people have the expectation of the device being a phone that runs phone apps; having some of the functionality of a desktop is a bonus.

      It still seems like a niche product, though; most people with expensive smartphones also have other, better productivity devices. Taking your smartphone, plus a dock, and carrying or hoping to borrow a screen, keyboard and mouse where you need them seems inconvenient at best. The best use case I can think of is giving your smartphone-toting kids a cheap but limited PC with a full-size browser, Microsoft Office for school assignments, and potentially other apps if developers are actually willing to invest in the niche platform.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The forced obsolescence can only go far. Personally, I stopped using the iPhone after the iOS7 upgrade looked like crap and only did so because some of the apps I needed where no longer offered in iOS6. Didn't even bother with iOS8 and just bought a non-Apple phone.

      Considering that a ton of their revenue comes from corporate clients who tend to have a lot of legacy software, they made the decision to stick with the 32-bit version (hey, at least 16-bit support was gone in Windows Vista/7).

      I do agree that for Windows 10 they could have dropped the 32-bit support for their "consumer" edition. Chances are if you upgrade to WIndows 10 you won't be running your old version of PaintShopPro, Civilization 2, or Adobe ImageStyler.

    4. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by KidCeltic · · Score: 1

      I think you missed something or made an assumption that has given you the wrong idea of the concept behind Continuum. I don't think that MS is expecting one to carry around a docking station and all the paraphernalia. I believe they think people will be a dock for their home and/or work. Outside of those environs, the phone is just "a phone". But when they get to the workplace or at home where they consume media, surf the web, etc., they can hook up to the dock and have the full laptop experience. Who wouldn't want that ability?

    5. Re: Continuum could be a big hit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This makes no sense. If you are at home or work then you already have a computer. You wouldn't need to use your phone as one.

    6. Re: Continuum could be a big hit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's the other way around- you don't need a computer at your home or office. Your phone is your computer, you take it with you wherever you go.

    7. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by bazorg · · Score: 1

      I think that is a moot point with windows 10. Yes, some people will expect anything to work on whatever hardware they own, but then they head to the app store and it is clear that 1) some apps are not available compatible and the store will tell you that you can't download them; 2) there are many applications in the store that are badged as compatible with win32, 64 AND ARM.

      Typical Slashdot users will be interested in whether it's a win32, x86 or ARM device but the real customers will behave like those visiting the google play store: first you choose the app, then you get the store to start the install. If it doesn't work, you try another app. Hopefully with universal Windows apps it will be clearer why something does not install.

    8. Re: Continuum could be a big hit... by avandesande · · Score: 2

      It makes a ton of sense for a office user where you would have to buy them a laptop and a phone.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    9. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      But they are too scared to push people off ancient technology.

      Agreed though I can't really blame them, they get raked over the coals any time they try. They broke BC with Vista's security and driver model changes, now look what reputation Vista has. They tried to to introduce a more modern UI with Windows 8, same result.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    10. Re: Continuum could be a big hit... by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      If you are at home or work then you already have a computer.

      Computers age out. This may replace both your next computer and your next phone with one low-cost device. And you can still use your existing monitor(s) and keyboard/mouse.

      Of course this isn't sufficient if you need a powerful PC, but it could replace typical usage where the most demanding applications are Office or your web browser.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    11. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by Junta · · Score: 1

      Problem being that folks running Windows typically have a lot of applications that are not universal apps and likely never to become universal apps. Continuum *specifically* helps a phone provide the desktop/laptop support when paired with appropriate input/output setup, which is nice for generic applications, but more critically relevant to the applications that people run that are not in this mold.

      MS without x86 has been a very very uphill situation from a business perspective.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    12. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      An arm version would be very interesting for sure.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I'm going to say this but...

      Vista wasn't a bad OS once the first service pack came out. Literally, I had no problems with it. I should also mention that I had a box with ME on it that ran like a champ - however, it was specifically designed for ME and whatnot. But it did stay running and was no problem - being able to access the restore function from outside the OS was absolutely awesome.

      Anyhow, I liked Vista when it came out and liked it even more when it got its first service pack. The problem was that it was a rather huge change from the XP days and was even further from the 9x days. I actually kept a couple of boxes on it instead of moving to 7 and I have an MSDN subscription so it's not like I was lacking licenses to do so.

      I'm actually going to let my MSDN subscription lapse, finally. I've paid for it for a very long time now but I don't even use Windows much at all any more. I've been pretty happy with my return to Linux and have also been playing with GhostBSD a lot. I can't get VMWare for GhostBSD and I much prefer it to the other offerings. I also can't get Opera to work on it properly. What I need to do is suck it up, install it instead of using it in a VM, and just stick with it for a few months. I've yet to take that plunge.

      Either way, Vista was pretty good and its reputation is largely undeserved. It was/is stable and I never had a security incident that I am aware of. I often ran with absolutely no live-running antivirus application. I ran it on a whole host of varied hardware stacks and never had an issue. I was quite impressed, to be honest. It's not like I'm exactly gentle with my OS, I tend to try to break stuff as doing so intentionally is a way for me to learn new things. If I'm not breaking and fixing something then I'm not really learning.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    14. Re: Continuum could be a big hit... by Junta · · Score: 1

      My wife's ancient desktop could be matched by an Atom x7. If I bought a handset with an Atom x7 and dock, she has a new phone and a new desktop.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    15. Re: Continuum could be a big hit... by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      You had me until 'low-cost'. You can probably buy a full desktop or laptop for the cost of the dock for one of these - not to mention that a flagship-class phone capable of running a full-blown Windows system is probably lots more expensive than that cheap desktop or laptop computer. Convenience, sure. And I'd like to see this capability in Android phones and iPhones too. But it's not gonna come cheap - or by the time it does, the fact that it's Windows will be largely irrelevant. You're gonna be running those phone apps in desktop mode too.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    16. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking your smartphone, plus a dock, and carrying or hoping to borrow a screen, keyboard and mouse where you need them seems inconvenient at best.

      One dock at home, one dock at work. What's the problem?

      You might need to carry a screen and dock if you're traveling but that's no different than just bringing a laptop.

    17. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS without x86 has been a very very uphill situation from a business perspective.

      Except for Windows CE, which runs on every goddamned barcode scanner on the planet (not quite, but pretty close anyway).

      WinCE is literally "Windows for ARM", and it always has been. People seem to think it's dead, when it's really just been rebranded so that it isn't laughed at for being called "wince". They called it Windows Mobile for a while, then they broke compatibility and called it Windows Phone, then broke compatibility again and still called it Windows Phone, then they splintered it into 4 groups: Windows Embedded Handheld, Windows RT, and Windows IoT, and Windows Phone. It's all still just the ARM version of Windows formerly known as Windows Compact Edition.

      The difference now is that, while the older WinCE, WinMo, and WP7/WP8 apps won't run on modern WinEH/WinRT/WinIoT/WP10 devices, current apps will run on all of them interchangeably (as long as they don't require anything platform specific). And those same apps will run on WinNT (a.k.a. "real" Windows) as well. This is the thin end of the wedge, especially for business use. Whether that's good or bad, well, that's your opinion to form.

      This is turning out to be much like GUI development in the old days. Apple did it first, then others (including Microsoft) copied it unsuccessfully, then Microsoft finally got it right, and boy howdy did it get popular. So Apple released the iPad first, then everyone and their damned dog (including Microsoft) released a crappy "me too" product, and then Microsoft went back and is in the process of doing it right. Expect notable, if not necessarily good, results from this. We are, with tablets and mobile device integration, where we were with GUI development in about 1994 or 1995. Apple's been skating on past popularity for a while, others have gotten a toe-hold but haven't made a stand-out product yet, and Microsoft's "next big thing" is being released. Hang on tight.

    18. Re:Continuum could be a big hit... by shione · · Score: 1

      I'm genuinely interested in hearing your thoughts on this. How would have going x64 only in windows solved the problem for microsoft?

      How does making windows x86 and x64 compatible hold microsoft back?

  4. Surface Book by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The most interesting part of this (for me, at least) is the new Surface Book...could be a killer for creative work, a Surface Pro that's actually a goodlaptop.

    That is, if there isn't perceptible lag in the wireless display, that would really hurt stylus use.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Surface Book by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apparently the display isn't wireless, it just talks to a dedicated GPU in the base when the screen/tablet is docked. Should reduce latency, but unfortunately the GPU would be nice when using Photoshop et al. in tablet mode. The screen can also be flipped and attached backwards, for a faster--if unwieldy--tablet experience.

      I wasn't too impressed with the pen demo on the SP4, seemed rather laggy, like what you'd expect from an iPad. Still waiting to see if the iPad Pro 'Pencil' is half as smooth as Apple's videos made it look.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:Surface Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The display is actually the component with the CPU, so no there should be no lag.
      The keyboard/base has the GPU hardware and connectivity ports and obviously the keyboard.
      Unsure if the battery is branched there or additional storage.

    3. Re:Surface Book by JediJorgie · · Score: 1

      I will stick with the tablet line.. I do not need the bigger screen, the dGPU, or the ability to pick it up by the keyboard. Those are the only advantages I see with the Surface Book, and I am not willing to pay extra and trade weight/thickness for those features.

      I just hope the WiFi card is better than the one in the SP3.

      The Type Keyboard looks awesome though...

    4. Re:Surface Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody should create a custom asic for just this purpose, or add a little distributed "pen-intelligence" to the screen itself. It would be nice to have some innovation on the older core concepts of a laptop or a tablet for a change.

  5. OEM are peeing in their pants about Surface by CSHARP123 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That Surface book looks nice (obviously time will tell how it will perform). It looks to corner the high end laptop market.
    Next few weeks OEMs are bringing out their new hardware. Let us see how they compete with MS offerings

    1. Re:OEM are peeing in their pants about Surface by Junta · · Score: 2

      Of course this is a *problem* for MS, this is causing their partners to be at least somewhat concerned. I think getting dug in too hard into hardware is a mistake for MS. They overwhelmed Apple with partners to win in the past, trying to beat apple at their own game seems perilous.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:OEM are peeing in their pants about Surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the OEMs are competing with Apple on high end. Most high end are either development machines or MBP for just to flash around. I think the flash around crowd will start looking at this.

    3. Re:OEM are peeing in their pants about Surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see it from MS' perspective. They do not have the capacity or appetite to release new devices frequently as their OEMs may be able to, so they shot for the stars. It's a pricey device. They are diversifying and seeing how well Apple is doing, they see massive opportunity in hardware.

      Unlike Apple, nothing stops OEMs from installing the OS on their own devices which will continue to have their market. They are gaming notebooks, simple notebooks, notebooks with 16" screens, upgradeable, etc. The Surface book won't compete in many many areas.

    4. Re:OEM are peeing in their pants about Surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is being forced into hardware because their partners aren't getting the job done.

    5. Re:OEM are peeing in their pants about Surface by ripvlan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I thought the same thing years ago when MS first made the announcement. But then I realized that none of the MS OEMs were building equipment to compete with Apple. MS wanted to build the OS and User experience - but nobody was building an "iPad" or "MacBook Air" .... so MS had to do it.

      Now folks are talking about the Surface & Surface Pro and stating how Apple and others are beginning to imitate MS. MS may have actually gotten this form factor right. But they had to push the Innovation and not rely upon OEMS to invest in this space.

      Imagine the conversation: "Dear Dell/HP - we know PC sales are falling. Please spend money in this risky area and build a decent future tablet/laptop thingy" MS had, up to this point, been placing its hope for hw in the hands of others. With consumers flocking to Apple in this "new" mobile space MS had to stop it. But the OEMs were trying their own things to combat market slide. OEMs and MS were competitors - they wanted more features in Windows too (HP went to Linux for awhile).

      I believe this was a good plan for MS - own the direction and put their money where their mouth was. Still plenty of work to do - but now I think more people are starting to consider Windows Hardware again. Apple is building a Pro tablet, and OEMs are jumping in too.

       

    6. Re:OEM are peeing in their pants about Surface by DigiShaman · · Score: 0

      Microsoft has chosen this hill to die on; so be it!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:OEM are peeing in their pants about Surface by c · · Score: 1

      But then I realized that none of the MS OEMs were building equipment to compete with Apple.

      Sony was maybe closest with the VAIO series. But look what happened there.

      Microsoft can afford to lose money (or at least not profit) on hardware. MS OEM's can't.

      A higher end Windows device is competing against all other Windows devices at all kinds of price points, while Apple devices are almost competing in a whole other market. And not enough people were willing to buy high end Winstuff over cheaper models to make chasing that market worthwhile.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    8. Re:OEM are peeing in their pants about Surface by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Of course this is a *problem* for MS, this is causing their partners to be at least somewhat concerned. I think getting dug in too hard into hardware is a mistake for MS. They overwhelmed Apple with partners to win in the past, trying to beat apple at their own game seems perilous.

      It was a necessary thing. The oem's had shown complete unwillingness to compete on the high end with Apple and instead were ceding that market in exchange for fighting for the basement low cost high volume offerings. The high end offerings they were coming up with were while quite often performant were uninspiring.

    9. Re:OEM are peeing in their pants about Surface by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has chosen this hill to die on; so be it!

      die on? so far their surface offerings are performing massively well, so well that google and apple have been copying what they are doing. the sp4 looks like an exceptionally well built high specced machine, most of the execs where I work have replaced their ipads for surfaces and while the phones I think are still dead the surfaces are doing gang busters in enterprises as they are light, powerful and allow people to actually do real work rather than just consume media.

    10. Re:OEM are peeing in their pants about Surface by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      True - but MS is trying to change this. Move up into the BWM market and offer that Premium experience. If they don't - Apple will own it. Dell had that failed premium laptop named after (for/appeal to?) a woman - cool form-factor but low-end specs for the price.

      That said - regular folks still need a computer. Will they buy an iPad or a Windows thingy? Fighting for Mindshare - MS wants "you" to by a Windows thingy.

      I think the phablet will win out in the mid-to-lower end. People need a phone and a computer - the phablet is a merger of the two...plus it has Internet access. So for the person who only needs to read the newspaper/FB/email at home - why buy two devices? Just buy a big phone w/ Internet !

      I still have a PC - but I make my living using one. So it is my personal skill-sharpening device at home. But my iPad gets way more daily use than the PC.

  6. 'Dumb' laptop by avandesande · · Score: 2

    I wonder what form factor you could squeeze out of keyboard/battery/lcd that you would plug your phone into?

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:'Dumb' laptop by SScorpio · · Score: 2

      It'd just be a thinner laptop. The LCD dictates the size of the device, then to have be protected the bottom with the keyboard needs to be the same size.

      The Motorola Atrix already had this, but the software was much more limited that what can be pulled off with Continuum.

      http://www.amazon.com/AT-Laptop-Dock-Motorola-ATRIX/dp/B004M17D62

    2. Re:'Dumb' laptop by avandesande · · Score: 1

      If you could use the space that electronics and cooling take up for a battery you could get some pretty good run time between charges.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  7. Argh, NOT the TV show Continuum ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    ... and here I thought Microsoft was actually smart for once and have tie-ins with the sci-fi show

    I guess Apple had a bigger influence on product placement.

    1. Re:Argh, NOT the TV show Continuum ... by SScorpio · · Score: 2

      It wouldn't be start to tie in a new product with a TV show that's ending this week.

    2. Re:Argh, NOT the TV show Continuum ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elated about this feature in new phones, bummed about the show ending. I can't win...

  8. The problem with Contiuum is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OS installation is out of your control. It's in the full control of the device manufacturer and/or the phone company with built-in trojan horses that provide remote access to pretty much everything. Same with iPhone and Android phones. I would never want to use a treasonous device as my main computer. The Neo900.org + Replicant OS projects look good for people who want to be in full control over their own hardware and operating system.

    1. Re:The problem with Contiuum is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to burst your bubble, but your carrier can push nice payload onto your phone as well. Best thing is to disable the antenna and wireless features in general. You can still play Tetris on it and refer to the index of your manifesto.

    2. Re:The problem with Contiuum is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt the carrier can push anything to a Neo900 device running Replicant OS (software changes etc.) The OS would be installed by myself and get updates from the server I configure it to get updates from. "Apps" installed from FreshPorts (GPL only) would only get updates from where they are told to.

      Also, the Neo900 deliberately chose a CPU without a modem built into it. The cellular modem is on a separate chip. There is a hardware watchdog chip that resets the modem chip whenever there is any activity if it is supposed to be off. So even if the carrier takes advantage of 90's firmware bugs in the modem to hack it, it will be fruitless. Another advantage of keeping the modem on a separate chip is that it does not have shared access to memory.

      Still I'll never use it as my primary computer. But as a phone I trust it more. I don't use cellular, I only use VoIP services over Wifi when available because I do not need to be connected / accessible 24x7. Wifi is turned off as soon as I walk out the door so there are no wireless transmissions being leaked for gov't or commercial access points to log as I pass by (like what goes on in Seattle: http://www.infowars.com/exclusive-snowden-level-documents-reveal-stealth-dhs-spy-grid/ )

    3. Re:The problem with Contiuum is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I owe you an apology.

      I spouted my comment because we had a client get his phone tampered with in, surprise, surprise, Beijing. Since the carrier was under their control they were able to push an update to his phone. Even though his IT department had told him not store files on it or even use the bloody thing, he thought he knew better. If they had been smarter they would have pushed an update to restore the phone to its original firmware, instead the hashes on some key files didn't match to the standard deploy of the company.

      Could have happened in the US as well I guess.

  9. Meh it was at least interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought the Hololens has great potential but Microsoft kind of went the wrong direction in its demo. I get first person shooter is a great demo for 3D reality. But the fact this is a $3000 device aimed at business seems a bit childish to show its abilities playing a game. Besides that you could tell the guy had to kind of react slow which was also not natural. Otherwise I thought Microsoft impressed the best it has so far in selling Windows 10. Still most of what they talked about is in higher end and new products. The Surface 4 Pro seems great, but hardly a consumer notebook. In fact, I used to probably be a potential buyer for a Surface 4 Pro as I used to buy Macbook Pro's. But now I am perfectly fine with a Macbook Air and could easily buy an even cheaper notebook and still be productive. Much like a see the new Vaio Pro tablet its just a niche market but most like has better profit margins. The least interesting new products were the phones. Just did not see anyone dumping a iPhone or Galaxy for any of the Windows models. So in closing, I guess you could say, Microsoft had a lot for upper end devices but little to impress the average consumer.

    1. Re:Meh it was at least interesting by JediJorgie · · Score: 1

      Today's event was a consumer facing event.. that is why we got the demo we did.

  10. Preorder! by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    Surface book, i7, 512gigs :)

  11. Continuum is great by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    It's my favorite SyFy show.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  12. OK, it's a devkit...BUT.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still not going to be a viable consumer option at even 1/3 the price! No one is going to shell out $1000+ for this...not to play games with anyway. I can see some great applications for this...but gaming isn't one of them!

    1. Re:OK, it's a devkit...BUT.... by JediJorgie · · Score: 1

      And I think MS agrees with you. Consumers will have to wait until the technology matures and the price comes down.

      Businesses however, won't blink at $3K for a dev kit. Heck a lot of data visualization software costs that much a year just for the license.

    2. Re:OK, it's a devkit...BUT.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering it ISN'T aimed at gaming or the general consumers in the current iterations your right. But considering they have EXPLICITLY stated this you win the prize for stating the fucking obvious sherlock

  13. Why all in one devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do they make a tablet that will replace the laptop?

    If I want to replace my laptop with a tablet, it will be my choice, not some senior designer of a multinational.

    Why don't they just make a great tablet and leave the laptop to their army of OEM's?

    They were comparing a tablet with a Macbook Air. But a Macbook is a laptop that you can fit in your backpack, take out, open the lid and put on your lap and start running desktop / laptop apps.

      A tablet needs an external keyboard, a desktop to put your screen (with flap) on and will give your tablet apps on a laptop.

    Also what's the point of a phone that can be used as a desktop (after buying expensive add ons)? Why an average smart phone, with average apps that can be used as an average desktop with above average prices? Just make a great phone, and stop trying to create the one size fits all device...

    Apple's and Androids have already replaced the laptop for many people and they never even tried to be a desktop OS. Why? Because desktops are overrated. Most work isn't done in Office, it is done by communicating. What does it matter that your ears could potentially run an Excel sheet with thousands of rows and columns, when you could just have a phone on speak while looking at your Excel sheet on your laptop?

    I can give my tablet to my wife, my phone to my kid and still be 'productive' on my laptop...

  14. Continuum vs Ubuntu Convergence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was getting my hopes up for Convergence on an Ubuntu Phone. I'm not sure it'll be able to stand up to a Microsoft equivalent though.

    1. Re:Continuum vs Ubuntu Convergence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu on ARM will carry nearly every software package available for Ubuntu running natively, minus some proprietary stuff, unless they recompile. Ubuntu also contains a full dev environment, so you can download source and compile to the new target yourself.

      Windows on ARM will have some shovelware and likely 0% of the Windows software that you actually want to use, which assumes an Intel instruction set.

  15. New phone market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am betting that with these new phones MS will triumphantly climb back to the 2.8% global market share level.

  16. Surface Pro 4 resolution by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Microsoft also demo'd the Surface 4. Its improved screen is 12.3" at 2160x1440, for a pixel density of 267 PPI.

    That part of the Ars Technica article isn't written very clearly:

    what was a 12-inch 2160x1440 screen is now 12.3 inches with a 267PPI display.

    In other words, the Surface Pro 3 had a 12" 2160x1440 screen. The Surface Pro 4 has a 12.3" 2736x1824 screen that's 267 PPI. I had been waiting for an ARM-based high-resolution 12-13" tablet for my piano sheet music collection. But I may just end up grabbing one of these if they've extended the battery life to ARM tablet levels.

    1. Re:Surface Pro 4 resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch the demo if you haven't seen it - they show a composer composing a score on a surface using the pen and it was amazing how well it worked.

  17. Lumia 635 is available for $40. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My understanding is that Microsoft is bleeding money to get those Lumias in consumer hands. It might be worth it to pair it with an MVNO network (don't activate it on AT&T or T-Mobile; pull the SIM card and replace it, but double check that since I haven't done it).

    And there are name-brand Android phones in the $100-130 range. The Moto E 2nd Gen 3G is one of them. As long as the phone has a quad-core CPU, 1 gig of RAM, and 8 gigs of storage, it should be okay. (I'd stay away from off-brand because they do have support problems and the software had some bugs and who knows what else.)

  18. Why buy a Surface Pro 4 over a Surface Book by iffer · · Score: 1

    Looking at the specs I can't see why anyone would buy the Surface Pro 4 over the Surface Book...

    1. Re:Why buy a Surface Pro 4 over a Surface Book by Wdomburg · · Score: 2

      Price? The entry level Surface Book (i5 / 8GB / 128GB) is $1499. The entry level Surface Pro 4 (m3 / 4GB / 128GB) is $899. Or for the same $1499 as the entry level you can get the i5, but with 16GB of memory and a 256GB SSD instead.

      Weight? The Book is 3.48#. The Pro 4 is 1.73# (or 2.36# with the cover).

      Size? The Book is 0.51" thick (0.91" with the keyboard). The Pro 4 is 0.33" (0.52" with the cover).

      In other words, matter of preferences and priorities, like anything else.