Former Reuters Media Editor Found Guilty of Helping Anonymous Hack Into LA Times (twitchy.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Prolific tweeter and former Reuters social media editor Matthew Keys, charged with computer hacking under the Computer Fraud & Abuse Act, was found guilty today on all counts and faces up to 25 years in prison when sentenced in January. Wired reports: "According to authorities, during a recorded FBI interview with Keys in October 2012 at his home, prior to his indictment, he admitted to his involvement in the hacking of the L.A. Times, and to sending a series of disparaging, sometimes threatening e-mails to a former employer. Keys waived his Miranda rights at the time of the interview and was concerned that the case not be publicized, apparently believing he might get off as a cooperating witness."
They guy admitted to breaking the law...
In other news, a guy goes to jail after admitting to B&E...
My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
Bad Reporting on Matthew Keys' Possible Sentence Conceals Prosecutorial Power
TLDR: In almost all cases, definitely including this one, the maximum possible sentence is entirely irrelevant to the sentence that will be actually imposed.
Waving one's Miranda rights in "hopes of getting off as a cooperating witness" is an ill advised legal maneuver.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.
Ernest Hemingway