Slashdot Mirror


Charge Rage: Electric Cars Are Making People Meaner In California

HughPickens.com writes: Matt Richtel reports that the push to make the state greener with electric cars is having an unintended side effect: It is making some people meaner. The bad moods stem from the challenges drivers face finding recharging spots for their battery-powered cars. Unlike gas stations, charging stations are not yet in great supply, and that has led to sharp-elbowed competition. According to Richtel, electric-vehicle owners are unplugging one another's cars, trading insults, and creating black markets and side deals to trade spots in corporate parking lots. The too-few-outlets problem is a familiar one in crowded cafes and airports, where people want to charge their phones or laptops. But the need can be more acute with cars — will their owners have enough juice to make it home? — and manners often go out the window. "Cars are getting unplugged while they are actively charging, and that's a problem," says Peter Graf. "Employees are calling and messaging each other, saying, 'I see you're fully charged, can you please move your car?'"

The problem is that installation of electric vehicle charging ports at some companies has not kept pace with soaring demand, creating thorny etiquette issues in the workplace. German software company SAP installed 16 electric vehicle charging ports in 2010 at its Palo Alto campus for the handful of employees who owned electric vehicles. Now there are far more electric cars than chargers. Sixty-one of the roughly 1,800 employees on the campus now drive a plug-in vehicle, overwhelming the 16 available chargers. And as demand for chargers exceeds supply, there have been notorious incidents of "charge rage." Companies are finding that they need one charging port for every two of their employees' electric vehicles. "If you don't maintain a 2-to-1 ratio, you are dead," said ChargePoint CEO Pat Romano. "Having two chargers and 20 electric cars is worse than having no chargers and 20 electric cars. If you are going to do this, you have to be willing to continue to scale it."

50 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by danbert8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Or another alternate headline: "Rich people fight over free lunches"

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    1. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by knightghost · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So let them pay for the charging spot. Running wire is pretty cheap.

    2. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by tripleevenfall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's my idea. If they want these prime spots right near the building that also give their cars free fuel, why not require a permit and have them pay a monthly fee? Then you can use the money to build out all the outlets you need.

      As the article states, it's worse to have too few than to have none.

    3. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dunno... up here in Portland, I've lost count of the prime parking 'chargers only 'cuz we're teh environmentalz!!!!' spots that sit empty most of the time, even during peak shopping/working hours.

      Wouldn't mind having the EV owners pay for the privilege, though, because if they don't, the rest of us do (the stores aren't installing the things out of the goodness of their hearts, you know, and they have to recoup the costs somewhere).

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      Why are they giving away the electricity? Is it difficult to meter or something?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because they want to look "environmentally conscious", so they put two chargers in their parking lot and then add a slide about how "green" they are for the shareholders' meeting.

    6. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe things work differently in California but TFA seems to a bit strange to me. When I'm charging the charging cable is locked in at both ends. It can't be unplugged without a great amount of force, that will probably damage something.

      It's not an "in California" thing - it's an "on some cars" thing. On the eGolf for example, the charger locks, and does not unlock unless the owner comes back and unlocks the vehicle. On the Leaf, it can be set to not lock even during charging (made safe by having control pins disconnect before power pins, and stopping charging as the plug is pulled).

    7. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People pay large amounts of money for electric cars so they can feel superior to the rest of us average drivers. They are saving the environment and you are destroying it. So They are better than everyone else.

      Of course people like that are more or less petty by default. So combine Petty with snootiness and you have a recipe for fights over status.

    8. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by sycodon · · Score: 2

      "Demand for Electric Vehicles Outpaces Free Recharge Ports."

      Fixed.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    9. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by msauve · · Score: 2

      "One of the main advantages of EVs is that you don't need to take 10 minutes out of your day to park and wait for hydrocarbons to flow into a tank."

      ITYM "10 minutes out of your week." vs. 10 minutes out of each day finding a spot with charging near where "you're stopped for another reason anyway," getting the cable out, plugging, unplugging and stowing the cable. If that's an advantage, it's one for gasoline powered vehicles.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    10. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can just charge for time at the charger. Time metering is cheap and easy.

    11. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by swillden · · Score: 2

      Or another alternate headline: "Rich people fight over free lunches"

      It's not so much about the free electricity. I think most would be fine with paying for the juice. It's about being able to get home.

      When I worked in an office with chargers, though, it really wasn't a problem. We just set up a mailing list that everyone with a short-range EV subscribed to, and used it to communicate about vehicle swapping on the chargers. Unplugging someone else's car would have been considered very uncool, and no one ever did that. Those who lived close or had longer-ranged cars (i.e. Teslas), just didn't charge at the office, with the exception of one Tesla owner who didn't have a place to charge at home.

      I notice that my 2013 LEAF (unlikely my 2011 LEAF) has a charging port lock, which can be set to lock the charger in until the car is fully charged. I've never had the need to use it, but I can see the purpose. What would be even better is if you could set it to unlock at a specific charge level. Then people could set it to unlock as soon as they have enough juice to get home.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is actually done that way due to the LEED certification process for green buildings; parking spots for carpools, low emitting vehicles, and EVs need to be prime spots. Electrically they are a pain because they are 40A at 208V, which makes provisions for more than three a bit of a challenge; 480V units would be much easier to accommodate.

      The shortage is just a timing issue; chargers will catch up. The problem really is that many employers provide them for free.

    13. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by operagost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can't park within 1000 feet of the supermarket doors in their own parking lot now.
      - 20 Handicapped spaces
      - 6 "expectant mother" spaces
      - 4 spaces to pickup internet orders
      - 4 EV charging spaces

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    14. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      People pay large amounts of money for electric cars so they can feel superior to the rest of us average drivers. They are saving the environment and you are destroying it. So They are better than everyone else.

      To be fair, that is true. They ARE doing something about the environment that you're not. Of course they shouldn't lord it over people, and I doubt whether many do in reality. It's probably more paranoia or guilt on your part.

    15. Re:Hipsters fight over limited supplies of juice by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Informative

      They run relatively thin wires all over the parking lot, 12ga to run at most 5A at 480v, assuming the longest run is 500ft. When you're pushing 208v to a device pulling 40A, at that distance you need much thicker wire, 1ga. You can walk into Lowe's and buy stranded 10ga for $0.29/ft, while stranded 1ga sells for $2.19/ft, more than 7.5x as expensive. Of course, you wouldn't buy your wire by the foot from a home improvement store for this type of project, but the price variance will be similar buying from a bulk distributor.

      On the other hand, if you shorten the distance to 250ft by moving the charging spots closer to the building, you can get by on 4ga, at only a hair under 3.5x the cost of 10ga, or put the spaces right by the building and get by on 6ga, coming in at (interestingly) about the same cost per foot. But also many fewer feet.

      To give some perspective, let's look at a parking lot that runs 350ft out from the building, assuming the building is 100x100ft with power distributed from the middle of the back of the building. That gives you approximately 500ft to the farthest point in the lot where you might need a light. If lights are placed evenly in 4 rows, edge to edge, they will be placed 25ft apart across the lot; we'll assume similar spacing going down the lot, giving us 4 rows of (350/25) 14 lights. Since we're "green" enough to offer charging stations, we're also green enough to use LED lights weighing in at 150W that match 500W metal halide lamps in brightness, giving us a total of 2100W per row of lights. At 480v, that's 4.375A, requiring 12ga wire for a 500ft run. Pessimistically, we need 4000ft (the two middle rows will actually be about 50ft shorter, requiring 100ft less wire each, but let's ignore that and give your position a chance to hold up), which would cost $1160 to pick up from Lowe's by the foot. That's enough wire to power all 56 lights in the parking lot.

      Now, let's install one charging station in the far corner of the lot. Just one. 40A at 208V and a distance of 500ft, we need to run 500ft of 1ga wire, for a total bill of $2190 if purchased per-foot at Lowe's. And you can't daisy-chain them like the lights in each row of lot lighting; you have to run an entire cable pair for each charging station.

      If you're going to put, for example, 10 stations in each row of parking, you need conduit that can hold 20 runs of 1ga wire; since that conduit will also likely be shared by the lighting wiring, it needs to be oversized so, according to NEC, 3-1/2" conduit is required in order to safely run all of this wire. I wont' bother factoring in the cost of the conduit, as I'm sure I've already made my point. If we have 4 rows of parking, and 10 charging stations per row, we're talking about 40 charging stations. If we want to put them at the far end of the lot, we're talking about nearly 40k feet of 1ga wire at a cost of nearly $88k (again, at retail, by the foot, not how you'd actually buy it; we can ignore the dollar values, but the cost multiples will be similar), or over 75x the cost of wiring all of the lighting in the parking lot.

      Now, let's install our 40 charging stations in the 40 spots closest to the store. If we assume 6ft wide spots, we can put 10 right on the building, 5 on each side of the entryway, and still have 40ft for the entry. Worst case for those 10 is a 150ft run. If the spots are 10ft deep and we have a 20ft traffic lane, the next farthest charger will be at 180ft; with 4 chargers per row and keeping the 6ft spot width, we'll need 7 full rows of chargers and 1 row with chargers in the 2 middle spots. Since the edge spots on the 7th row will be farther from the power distribution point than the middle spots in the 8th row, those are our farthest distance, worst case scenario, at a distance of 216ft. At that distance, we can use 4ga wire.

      In fairness, since the 500ft example treated all installed charging stations as the worst case (2x500ft of 1ga), I'll do the same here. That's 2x216ft of 4ga by 40 chargers, or 17,280ft of 4ga at $

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  2. It isn't climate change... by JeffOwl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That will be the end of humanity

  3. Electric cars do not make people mean by gtall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It would seem electric cars are simply giving mean people another way to express just how mean they can be.

  4. Merry pranksters by sjbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to Richtel, electric-vehicle owners are unplugging one another's cars, trading insults, and creating black markets and side deals to trade spots in corporate parking lots.

    I've always thought that once they became sufficiently popular you might need some sort of lock on the charger while charging otherwise merry pranksters (read @$$holes) might come along and just unplug your car, effectively leaving you stranded for a period of time if your charge is low.

    1. Re:Merry pranksters by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      I believe that some (most?) models do come with locking mechanisms, if only for safety/liability reasons.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  5. Re:ICEd by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Way to win people over for buying electric cars. Now I feel like installing fake charging ports just to fuck with assholes like you.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  6. Talking to someone is mean now? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >> Employees are calling and messaging each other, saying, 'I see you're fully charged, can you please move your car?'

    Um...isn't this the way the world is supposed to work? Or is getting someone's attention and letting them know that it's time to move along now considered a microaggression?

    1. Re:Talking to someone is mean now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed, but we're now into hipster dweebville where everyone hides behind their screens and cannot cope with people in real life. You'd think a modern system would send and alert via SMS or email to the car owner to have them be made aware their car is done allowing them to move the fucking thing. Hopefully the next step is to clamp the pricks.

    2. Re:Talking to someone is mean now? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      >> Employees are calling and messaging each other, saying, 'I see you're fully charged, can you please move your car?'

      Um...isn't this the way the world is supposed to work? Or is getting someone's attention and letting them know that it's time to move along now considered a microaggression?

      You noticed that too. Until the demand issue is fixed, it seems like people are just working things out for themselves. After the number of charging ports rise, the problem will go away.

      The entire story can Occam to some people hate EV's, and any negative spin - even ridiculous ones like this - will be applied and brayed out like the end of the world.

      And everything is a microagression these days. Watch how pissed someone will be that I used "Occam" as a verb.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Talking to someone is mean now? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I didn't understand this either. That seems like the polite, neighborly thing to do with a shared resource. Whoever wrote the summary (if not the article) is a whining hipster douchebag - god forbid you should stop hogging a resource that other people need when you're not using it.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  7. Econ 101 by rlp · · Score: 2

    A "free" resource becomes a scarce resource. Solution: charge $ per time unit for a parking space with a charger. Increase price till shortage disappears.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  8. Somebody tell me... by Assoluto · · Score: 2

    ...how hard would it be to transmit power to the cars through the roads? A few years back wireless power was the big thing at consumer electronics shows, with demonstrations of televisions without power cables. Since then I've been wondering if this could be implemented for cars. If you got rid of the batteries it would vastly reduce the cost and weight of the cars, plus eliminate the issues related to recharging (range anxiety, charge times etc). You could have a small battery in the cars for driving on roads that are "off the grid" with the option for larger batteries for people who do a lot of off the grid driving. Is this technically viable or is there some reason it couldn't be implemented?

  9. Re:ICEd by nojayuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even smarter, install two fake charging ports next to each other. One has an "Out of Order" sign on it. The other one says "FREE CHARGING!".

    Wire them up so the "FREE" charger discharges the battery of anyone who plugs into it while feeding the power to the "Out of Order" charger your own electric car is plugged into.

  10. What usability problems really look like by Shoten · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember a while ago, as some people predicted that 30-minute charging times would be a problem. A lot of people formed a chorus to shout them down, referring to how long cars usually sit while people are at work, etc. But what those people didn't take into account is that a charging station is not at all like a normal parking spot. The charging equipment is expensive, as is installation of it...and like most things electrical, there are incredibly difficult challenges when you try to scale things. At first blush it may seem like a simple matter to simply run more wiring to build out more spots...but at some point you hit the stage where the line running to the building simply isn't big enough. So what...you get another transformer? It goes down the rabbit hole very quickly.

    Despite appearances, a charging station isn't a parking spot with a plug for your car. It's a spot at a gas pump that takes half an hour to use. And that's the real challenge with electric cars...not range, not cost. Those are solved or about to be solved.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:What usability problems really look like by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Allow me to explain how charging works.

      There are three types of charger. Slow chargers are like normal wall outlets, 230V in Europe and 120V/100V in the US/Japan. Typical EVs take 8-16 hours to charge from them. There are fast chargers, which provide up to about 7kW. In Europe they are just 32A single phrase, in the US and Japan they are multi-phase. They take 3-4 hours to charge a typical EV but usually don't require any special infrastructure, they can be added to any home or business or street. They are fairly cheap too, maybe £600 installed or more for public ones because they have to be a bit more robust than domestic.

      Then there are rapid chargers, 40kW and upwards. These need a special connection to the electrical grid and cost £10,000 upwards, including installation. They can charge a typical EV in 30 minutes.

      Most of the time people use slow or fast chargers, at home, at work at at their destination (hotel/shops/airport etc.) Because they are cheap and don't need special infrastructure to install, there can be lots of them. Contention generally isn't much of a problem because there are so many, but of course we do need to ensure more are being installed constantly. Waiting 3-4 hours for a charge is no problem if you are shopping or watching sports or staying overnight. Even a slow 8 hour charge is no problem if you don't need a 100% charge.

      Rapids are only really used on long journeys.

      As EV range improves this will become less and less of an issue. If you can drive to work and back home on a charge, it doesn't batter if you can't charge at work. Most charging is done at home, and always will be because that will always be the cheapest option. I believe that California already has rules requiring landlords to allow installation of chargers.

      This article is mostly FUD.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:What usability problems really look like by Idou · · Score: 2

      And that's the real challenge with electric cars...not range, not cost

      You should talk more to EV owners to better inform your opinion . . .

      EV owner here, and I never charge at work. I charge at home, so I normally spend less time "refueling" in public than you do. Most EV owners are in a similar situation. Charging in public is for those extra trips outside of normal activity.

      By the way, EV chargers are SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper and simpler than installing a gas station. The biggest thing holding back EV charger installation is simply demand. The strange bickering TFA talks about is most likely due to treating chargers as a "commons" rather than a business. There are business oriented networks out there and people who hog chargers fund the next round of new chargers (that is how business works. . . ). If demand at a certain spot reaches too high a level for the existing power supply, the charger network can just upgrade the supply, install a battery, etc . . . and it still would all be SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper and simpler than installing a gas station.

      You see gas stations everywhere and think "boy, that must be simple and cheap" and see few EV stations and think "wow, that is must be complex and expensive." You probably think the same about ICE vs. EVs. You simply are forgetting the context of a century of investment in one technology vs very recent and modest investment in the other. Same goes for LED vs incandescent lightbulbs.

      In short, new technologies can be better in almost every way yet still take a while to hit mainstream due to the inertia of older, more complicated, more costly technologies. Do not mistaken social inertia for technological superiority.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  11. lol by grub · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would love to see the fights: kale smoothies splattered on hemp clothing, dreadlocks being pulled.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  12. eco-entitlement by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Informative

    Compounded certainly by the relatively well-documented issue about people who feel they're doing "their part" (driving green cars, using shopping totes, whole foods customers, etc.) being entitled assholes.

    --
    -Styopa
  13. Re:ICEd by grub · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Trolling is a art,
  14. Spoiled Californians by GSMacLean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh, waah, cry me a river. I live in Ohio, and the only place I have ever found to plug in my car is in my own garage, at my home. There ARE no public charging ports, anywhere. They don't exist here. So when I hear about Californians crying because they can't conveniently find enough public charging ports, excuse me if I don't get all weepy about their struggle.

  15. SAS in Cary NC has over 40 chargers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We have over 40 chargers herespread over many different buildings, usually no problem to get one. There are 4 spaces for each dual-plug station. There is a posted 4 hour limit, so and the employees are really good at moving charge cables around when charging is finished. You can be fairly sure that if you park in a charging spot even if you can't plug in you will be full by EOD. If you really need to make sure you are charging you can check your Leaf app and see if you've been plugged in by lunch, if not you go out and move it (and any others that need to be moved).

  16. Re:ICEd by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

    Yeah, because clearly vandalism is a fantastic way to get your message across and not cause further problems.

    I hope you get caught on camera causing someone financial harm, so that you and your pretentious bullshit can spend some time in jail and learn what real hardship is like.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  17. the term for this by fche · · Score: 2

    Tragedy of the Hipster Commons

  18. problems of the wealthy by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ah, what is the world coming to! After spending $100000 on a Tesla, people can't find recharging spots. Obviously, "for the environment", we must mandate more more recharging spots, so that the poor, environmentally conscious "middle class" of Silicon Valley can recharge their cars.

    (Actually, a far bigger problem with Teslas and other electric cars is that people get quiet "insane" acceleration and start driving like mad men.)

  19. Re:Maybe... by willworkforbeer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Californians are just terrible people in general, and no amount of "green" technology or reduction in fossil fuel consumption can change their nature.

    It's generation X. Now back in the good old days.......

    ...we had few fights at the horse-oats feeding station, but if we did, Gunfight, Bitches!

    --
    Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
  20. I Just Solved This Problem by Guy+From+V · · Score: 2

    Extension cords. Your welcome.

    1. Re:I Just Solved This Problem by Guy+From+V · · Score: 2

      Shit, that's a "you're", over.

  21. a classic economics problem by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So let them pay for the charging spot. Running wire is pretty cheap.

    Accurate analysis from the very first post. This is a classic economics problem, overuse of a good that is given away for free; and has a classic economic solution: put a price on it.

    This is silicon valley. Make an ap for them them to sign up for their spot online.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:a classic economics problem by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      "Tragedy of the commons"? Free shared resource tends to make people behave like douchebags, yes.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  22. History by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    People who find this interesting are maybe too young to remember what it was like during the oil embargo last century when gas stations would run out of product. There were long lines at the gas pumps, fights and shootings. Local governments had to enact "odd/even" day refueling to prevent riots at the gas stations.

    And this story? Here's an example of how insufficient charging stations has made people "meaner":

    "Employees are calling and messaging each other, saying, 'I see you're fully charged, can you please move your car?'"

    This is apparently what millennials think is "mean". I mean, for chrissake the guy said "please". In my day, if you wanted to be mean to another driver, you broke his headlights, cracked his windshield and pissed in his gas tank. Now THAT was mean.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  23. Re:Hipsters fight over "free stuff" by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why are they giving away the electricity? Is it difficult to meter or something?

    Free is the key thing here. Yes, the solution is just charge for time on the charger, and used that money to put in more chargers. But humans are uniquely curious when it comes to free stuff. Give away free stuff and everybody wants some, and they hate it when someone else gets free stuff and they don't. Charge just a little bit for it, and then it changes the whole attitude.

    What is interesting is that most EV drivers probably don't need the charge to get home and carry out their daily errands. If they do then they probably made the wrong vehicle choice. They just want to charge up on someone else's dime.

    Of course, there will be a few who would somehow feel entitled and would see such a change and respond.... "can you believe they are taking away our free charging!".

  24. Re:ICEd by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

    We need legislation. We cannot allow the early bird to get the worm. Its an antiquated concept and it is not fair. It is clearly discriminatory.

  25. Re: Competition with Gas Cars by tompaulco · · Score: 2

    Most parking lots have lights. Adding adding a charging station to existing and/or new lots shouldn't be huge undertakings.

    Adding a charging station to a an existing lot IS a huge undertaking. All of the lights in a parking lot probably take less power than a single charging station. The lights are 110V, and the charging station is going to be 240V. So new wire must be pulled, it must be thicker wire to support higher current. A high powered overhead light might draw 4 amps at 110V. A single charging station is going to draw 50 Amps at 240V. That is over 25 times as much power. Permits would have to be pulled and the parking lots breaker boxes and possibly the feed from the main electrical line would have to be upgraded. In fact, service to the neighborhood that the lot is located in may have to be upgraded.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  26. Re:Hipsters fight over "free stuff" by toadlife · · Score: 4, Informative

    Throw in traffic jams and start and stop driving while running AC and stereo, etc., and that 300 mile range drops fast.

    You've got it backwards.

    Stop and go driving and traffic jams are where electric cars shine the most. AC takes, at the very most 3kW; much less once the cabin is cooled down. Even at full blast, 3kW saps about 12 miles of range per hour.

    EPA range numbers for electric cars are based on highway speeds. Electric cars easily get 150% of the EPA range at traffic jam speeds of 30-50 MPH.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  27. Only utility companies (PUC's) can meter by thule · · Score: 2

    Recently I was talking to an electrician that was upgrading the charging ports at a parking structure. He was telling me that only government recognized utilities can meter the electricity (PUC's). Parking garages are getting around the issue by charging a higher flat rate for parking in a spot with a charging station. They also have NFC cards to turn on the charging stations for people that are paying extra for the spot. The thing is, in a commercial building, the employer is usually paying for the spot. This creates a bit of an issue because it incentives people to charge their cars only at work when the grid is in high demand instead of at home when the demand is lower at night. The told me there is a company called Freedom (you'll have to look it up). That is making grid aware charging stations that will turn off the stations during high demand grid. That is when the fun really begins! The charging stations will turn off the power automatically and people can't override it by grabbing the wire in the next space over.