Slashdot Mirror


802.11ac WiFi Router Round-Up Tests Broadcom XStream Platform Performance (hothardware.com)

MojoKid writes: Wireless routers are going through somewhat of a renaissance right now, thanks to the arrival of the 802.11ac standard that is "three times as fast as wireless-N" and the proliferation of Internet-connected devices in our homes and pockets. AC is backward compatible with all previous standards, and whereas 802.11n was only able to pump out 450Mb/s of total bandwidth, 802.11ac is capable of transmitting at up to 1,300Mbps on a 5GHz channel. AC capability is only available on the 5GHz channel, which has fewer devices on it than a typical 2.4GHz channel. The trade-off is that 5GHz signals typically don't travel as far as those on the 2.4GHz channel.

However, 802.11ac makes up for it with a technology named Beamforming, which allows it to figure out where devices are located and amplify the signal in their direction instead of just broadcasting in all directions like 802.11n. Also, while 802.11n supports only four streams of data, 802.11ac supports up to eight streams on channels that are twice as wide. HotHardware's AC Router round-up takes a look at four flagship AC routers from ASUS, TRENDnet, D-Link and Netgear. All are AC3200 routers that use the new Broadcom XStream 5G platform. Netgear's Nighthawk X6 tends to offer the best balance of performance in various use cases. However, all models performed similarly, with subtle variances in design, features and pricing left to differentiate them from one another.

8 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. Buy APs, not Wireless Routers by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wireless routers are a security disaster. Public interface combined with the front door and back door to your network.

    Get access points. They don't run out of memory because they aren't doing all that routing and firewall stuff.
    Have a separate router.

    Don't mix to two. Just don't.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Buy APs, not Wireless Routers by guacamole · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but why should I pay for all that routing functionality when I will turn it off anyway?

      You don't have any other alternatives, at least when we're talking about home-network class hardware. The market for plain ACs is so thin, that it's much easier and cheaper to actually buy a wireless router.

    2. Re:Buy APs, not Wireless Routers by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...or buy one supported by https://openwrt.org/

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:Buy APs, not Wireless Routers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Plus almost all of them are running embedded linux of some sort so its trivial for the manufacturer to add routing capabilities as most consumers see it as a necessary feature. It would cost them far more in returns and sales for dumb consumers buying an AP thinking it's also a router if it was marketed towards consumers.

    4. Re:Buy APs, not Wireless Routers by ernest.cunningham · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Ubiquiti UAP Access Points I would consider home-network through to enterprise class. A three pack is cheaper than all but the Trendnet router. Coupled with a Security Gateway and you have a bloody easy setup that is fairly price competitive and easy to maintain.
      https://www.ubnt.com/unifi/uni...

      I guess my feeling of what home-network class may be out of the norm but I found the ubiquity gear easier to setup and configure than the Fritzbox given to me by my ISP.

  2. Re:"up to 1,300Mbps" by guacamole · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The 1300Mbps is a scam figure because it's industry convention to report the layer 2 data transfer rate, but at that layer there is a lot of chatter dealing specifically with the physical link quality, which can be substantial with wireless. So indeed, in most cases you can take the number, then divide by two. That's the TCP/UDP data rate you will see in the best case scenario.

    Moreover, 1300Mbps is the figure for the three-stream capable devices. But what's the percent of clients with three stream wireless adapters? About less than 5%?

  3. Re:Apple Airport? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 3, Informative

    No mention of Apple products. Apple has been using 802.11ac for years. I have one of their wifi routers: easy to use, just works, etc. and it has 802.11ac.

    That's because it's really a Broadcom Xstream Chipset Router Roundup, not an 802.11ac Router Roundup. I wanted to see how they compared to my Draytek, but all they've reviewed is multiple tweaks of the same reference design from Broadcom. They even say they're reviewing "top-shelf units" (first time I've heard D-Link and Trendnet described as top-shelf), but then totally omit what I'd consider actual top-shelf units, maybe an Aironet 3600, a Draytek 2860, and an Airport Extreme.

  4. Re:They all have weakness by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They do seem to have focused almost entirely on one single thing, which is probably irrelevant for most non-geek users: If their router can stream YouTube, Skype, or Facetime, then it's fast enough. The criteria that really matter to most users, things like "Do you need to reboot it every second day in order to keep it functioning", "What are the chances of it being incorporated into a botnet if I do something as totally crazy as connecting it to the Internet" (something that Asus, D-Link, Netgear, and, oh yes, Trendnet are notorious for), and "For how many minutes after I buy it will the vendor provide firmware upgrades" (Linksys, where everything's a legacy product as soon as it ships) haven't been taken into consideration.