Slashdot Mirror


Americans Show 'Surprising Willingness' To Accept Internet Surveillance (dailydot.com)

Researchers from BYU recently took a survey of internet users (PDF), mostly from the U.S., to determine how they balanced opinions of security and privacy. They found, perhaps surprisingly, that over 90% of users are fine with somebody snooping their encrypted traffic, so long as they were informed of the snooping. Most of them also supported legislation requiring notification and/or consent. "Most respondents also agreed that employers should be able to monitor the encrypted Internet connections of employees even without notification or consent, especially when an employee used a company computer. There was less agreement when it came to employees using personal devices; approximately a third of respondents opposed surveillance in that case."

That said, "Despite accepting surveillance in a number of situations, 60 percent of respondents said that they would react negatively if they discovered that a network they currently use employed TLS proxies." The study also found 4.5% of participants were "jaded" toward the state of privacy and security on the internet, feeling that their traffic is already monitored, and that the government would circumvent whatever technologies we put in place to protect it. The researchers say this group "once cared about these issues but has lost all hope and has largely given up on ever achieving a secure world."

16 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. first godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hitler also got to power because most people were "fine with it."

    1. Re:first godwin by poofmeisterp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hitler also got to power because most people were "fine with it."

      ..and they were fine with it because they were falling into a bad economic depression, and were in the "anything that can possibly save us from this poor life is fine" mood. See: topic. If there were no other option; literally NO other option fed to peoples' minds to "find them thare turr'ists" other than having full access to ALL Internet traffic, let's say, I wager most (never 100%) all would bend and approve.

      Addendum I: No, even having full access to ALL information won't help the gub'mint find them; they're hiding by LYING and STRIKING.
      Addendum II: There are other ways of communicating other than the Internet. It's just easier and faster.

    2. Re:first godwin by jandersen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That may well be true, but I think this discussion misses the point somewhat. A lot of people genuinely don't care all that much. When you are young, you imagine that 'the authorities' are out to get you, because you don't realise you are probably not all that interesting to them. When you get older, you discover that most of what you do is utterly ignored by the police, government, secret services etc. There's far too much RELEVANT information as it is, and far too few police officers, secret agents etc. I mean, when you can hardly even get the police to come and take up a report on a burglary, why expect that they would spend much energy snooping on your online traffic? If they do, it is in the hope that they can employ automatic filters to discard most of it.

      When you get to my age, you realise that most of what you've done is pretty normal, and that you simply don't give a hoot if others know about it.

    3. Re:first godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not about you.

      That's what people don't get. Nobody gives a shit about you. It's about control and power. If I know everything about everyone, it gives me an unbelievable amount of power.

      So even if you are as clean as the driven snow, and even if nobody in power ever takes an interest in you, you're still as vulnerable as the rest of us to the type of tyranny this enables. And God forbid you ever do raise the interest of "the authorities," because even if you are as clean as the driven snow (unlikely), they can still find a way to f### you up royally if they know every single thing about you.

      But as I said, it's not about you. It's about US. That's why most people don't get it.

  2. They don't understand what it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't confuse ignorance with acceptance.

    1. Re:They don't understand what it means by kilfarsnar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't confuse ignorance with acceptance.

      Yes, exactly. I came here to post this. The issue is that people are short-sighted and have limited imagination. Everyone thinks this stuff is done to catch "bad guys". They don't consider themselves a possible target.

      People are okay with their employer snooping on their Internet traffic at work. Would they be okay if information gathered during that snooping were a factor in their next performance review? I would hope not. But it's not framed that way and they don't look at it that way.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    2. Re:They don't understand what it means by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, this has been working a long time now. It started years back with the then "controversial" types of things like cameras in the elementary school rooms, and then more and more.

      They have gotten kids used to be monitored.

      And now we see the results. It goes well with the old saying:

      "What one generation accepts....the following generations embrace."

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  3. home of the brave when its not my skin in the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    and land of the sheep.

  4. Land of the free? Home of the brave? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So in my lifetime America has gone from "give me liberty or give me death" to a bunch of scared sheep repeating "if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear"?

    Essentially your liberty and freedom have been traded away to allow your government to watch everything you do as long as they pretend to be keeping you safe?

    In 30 years we've gone from Americans making "papers please, comrade" jokes to fully embracing being constantly monitored for their own protection.

    That's pretty damned pathetic.

    Land of the free, home of the brave ... not so much.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  5. The questions were oddly techincal by Karmashock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should have stuck to very very simple questions if they were talking to a low information survey pool.

    Questions like:
    Do you want the government reading everyone's email?
    Do you mind if corporations know your every activity on the internet?

    Avoid the technical crap. Just keep it very very simple.

    *drops mic and walks*

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:The questions were oddly techincal by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you mind if corporations know your every activity on the internet?

      Given what people put on Facebook, the answer is no, they don't mind.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  6. I accept my employer's right by JohnFen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My employer owns my work machine and supplies the network it's connected to. I accept that the employer's right to monitor his own equipment and network.

    However, that's a FAR cry from accepting internet surveillance. In fact, I never attach any of my personal devices to my employer's network precisely because I do not accept the surveillance of my own equipment.

  7. Slashdot is really stepping up the propaganda. by pecosdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We've got at least a weekly "feel bad because you're male and you work in the computer field" article, and we mostly flame those, but we've come to expect them.

    Now we're getting the opinion poll to manipulate opinion.

    I miss the real / old Slashdot that exposed shit like this instead of propagating it.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  8. Re:Unsurprising, really by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Modern pop culture is all about celebrity. Now everyone is a celebrity because people are watching them. So this is a good thing by today's warped standards. How many of the children who want to be monitored everywhere they go and everything they do ever read 1984 or any other literature that warns of excessive state power and control? When you can just watch YouTube and do FaceBook all day, there isn't much time left to read dusty old books.

    --
    A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
  9. A nation of brainwashed pussies by TigerPlish · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "I pledge allegiance to the Corporations of the United States, and to the Republic which they freely rape.

    One Nation brainwashed and addled to believe in a "God," divided by ignorance and wealth, with Liberty and Justice only for the well-off."

    ---

    Well, America, isn't this what you wanted? Free stuff for everyone? Have the big corporations supply your every need, have the Big Bad Federal Government supply your every protection?

    You got it. Now enjoy it. Gooooood luck getting rid of it!

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  10. Never trust a survey by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Never trust a survey where they do not disclose the exact questions being asked of the participants, whether it supports your belief or discredits it. What is asked is often as important as who is being asked (the demographics of the questioner is important too). All of these factors can and have been manipulated by the survey-takers in order to reach a desired conclusion (and sometimes it is not even being done purposefully).

    In this case, it sounds like the questions of the survey (there is no full list but a few hints scattered throughout the PDF) were intentionally difficult for people to understand unless they had a grounding in the topic - computers, encryption, networking and security - being discussed. People tend to turn off their brain when confronted with this level of complexity and assume that the authorities who do understand this sort of thing have our best interests at heart (it seems built into the human psyche). Likely had the questions been more grounded - e.g., "do you think the government should be able to read any and all of your private mails, be it electronic or paper?" the results would have been different.