Slashdot Mirror


Nurses Use Makerspace To Invent Custom Health Care Solutions (hackaday.com)

New submitter wd5gnr writes: University of Texas Medical Branch and an MIT initiative have joined forces to create the first maker space in a hospital. Often nurses see things that would make their jobs easier or a patient's care better and now they can create custom solutions to those problems. They aim to spread this to other hospitals and form a community of medical makers.

8 of 50 comments (clear)

  1. Maker-Space in Hospital? by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Funny

    that's the delivery room.

    1. Re:Maker-Space in Hospital? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Holy shit. You were the frosty piss, and you screwed it up that horribly? The hotel elevator is the maker space. The delivery room is just the destination address on the slightly torn shipping label.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  2. Re:Nothing patient related I hope by mikael · · Score: 2

    Not really. Many patients have individual problems, like ulcers, sores or burns in particular places. Existing dressings and padding don't always fit perfectly or comfortably, especially around high pressure areas like the feet - the dressing must take the weight off the wound, but yet redistribute the weight so that it doesn't cut off circulation by pressing in elsewhere. So it takes a lot of trial and error to get the bandages wrapped comfortably.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  3. Not as efficient by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2

    Yes I think the medical device market is retarded in their regulations ... but they were originally put there for a reason

    The problem with this position is that it's not very efficient.

    The regulations have grown to mean "safety at any cost", which means that in many cases effective care has become a lower priority than perfect safety.

    Many examples abound. I chatted with a researcher at Berman Gund who said that he had a cure for a specific genetic disease that affects about 250 people in America (and proportionally the rest of the world). He said that many researchers have promising treatments for these less common ailments, but that it's impossible to navigate the FDA regulations due to cost.

    It takes $2.5 billion to bring a drug to market, and no company would pay that expense to cure 250 people.

    I remember reading an announcement for a migraine cure using magnetic fields (TMS). It was a sort of curved wand, like the end of a hockey stick. You place the bent end against the back of your head and press a button to give a burst of magnetic field and your migraine stops. The researchers stated that they were throwing the research to the public because they couldn't afford to bring the device to market due to FDA regulations.

    I also remember during the height of the AIDS thing where people who had a demonstrably fatal disease couldn't choose alternative therapies which had yet to be deemed "safe".

    You can't get out of the system, even with informed consent.

    So the result is that very few people get harmed by medical devices (and procedures), but a very large proportion of sick people get harmed by not having access to slightly less safe devices.

    We've missed having a balance, and as a result medical technology has pretty-much stagnated.

    1. Re:Not as efficient by just+another+AC · · Score: 2

      People will always cut corners whenever given the option.

      The reason it became "safety at any cost" is because if the more reasonable "safe when convenient to do so" becomes safe only when it doesn't impact profit by a single cent.

      Yes it is a PITA, (I deal with it every day), but while the alternatives could improve 1% of cases, it would be abused to reduce quality on the other 99%.

      So net positive, even when it creates some glaringly stupid situations.

  4. Nothing new by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    The medical profession has been doing this for years. Physicians, surgeons, nurses and physical therapists have been making their own tools and gear to help their patients since at least the early '80s. I worked with an orthopedic surgeon, her nurse and a physical therapist back then who were creating stuff in a workshop, with lathes, hammers, molds, cork, leather, plaster, plastic and steel. They made orthotics, braces, instruments, even silastic implants. Stuff patients could take home and use to make their lives easier.

    Rehabilitation medicine has been a "maker space" before makers were cool. Or thought they were cool.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Nothing new by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      They had a couple of MASH episodes along these lines.

      That's a 70s show about what went on in the 50s.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  5. Re:Nothing patient related I hope by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Lawyers would have a field day with this.

    I know that this is /. but if you read TFA you'd see that this is already covered.

    I asked Young about the ramifications of making what amounts to medical devices. She replied, “Hospitals already have the processes in place to do investigational studies, and these are treated just like those studies.”

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?