Slashdot Mirror


InFocus's New Kangaroo: a Screenless $99 Windows 10 Portable PC (venturebeat.com)

An anonymous reader writes: InFocus today debuted the Kangaroo, a $99 Windows 10 portable PC that "goes anywhere and works with any screen." The term "mobile desktop" may seem like an oxymoron, but that really is the best description: Picture your typical desktop PC tower shrunk down to the size of a phablet sans screen; just like any desktop, you'll still need to connect a mouse, keyboard, and monitor.

224 comments

  1. Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know what I'm getting for Jesus' birthday!

    1. Re:Nice! by stooo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Does it run Linux ?

      --
      aaaaaaa
    2. Re:Nice! by kheldan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does it run Linux ?

      I second this question; I'm done with Windows and Microsoft in general, and would rather not have a computer at all anymore than ever have Orwellian Windows 10.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    3. Re:Nice! by Vitus+Wagner · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you want to run Linux, buy something ARM-based, like Banana Pi or Raspberry Pi 2. There are quite descent boards, and they are much cheaper than $99.

    4. Re: Nice! by kenh · · Score: 4, Informative

      The $99 cost for this computer includes wifi, Bluetooth, a case, power supply, 4 hour battery, and 32 gig of storage. To similarly build up a Raspberry Pi would cost almost as much as this computer at $99.

      --
      Ken
    5. Re:Nice! by Locke2005 · · Score: 0

      Does the Linux version only cost $50 because of no Microsoft tax?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Nice! by present_arms · · Score: 2
      --
      http://chimpbox.us
    7. Re:Nice! by present_arms · · Score: 1

      I meant to click preview first, I meant possibly no but... ah nuts

      --
      http://chimpbox.us
    8. Re: Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The $99 cost for this computer includes wifi, Bluetooth, a case, power supply, 4 hour battery, and 32 gig of storage. To similarly build up a Raspberry Pi would cost almost as much as this computer at $99.

      No, not even close.

      Firstly, (if you bothered to check out the Newegg link) the dock with the external ports for USB and HDMI doesn't come in the $99 price. The proprietary dock is $40 more. So, $139 for the whole package.

      Second, the RPi has similar capability at $35 with a built-in Ethernet connection, double the number of USB ports, as well as audio in and out.

      The only pros to the Kangaroo are more memory, 32 GB of storage built in, built in WiFi and USB 3.0 support. The memory and USB 3.0 are not possible to work around, but a WiFi b/g/n dongle for the RPi is $10 and a 32 GB storage card is $15. At $139 vs. $100 for a similarly configured RPi, the Pi is a better, cheaper choice.

      Sorry, the Pi wins for most use cases where the Kangaroo would go head-to-head. The other marketed uses are done by smartphones with apps or adapters.

    9. Re: Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And another thing. The $99 price for the CPU and $39 for the dock is a limited time introductory price. The MSRP is $129.99 for the CPU and $49.99 for the dock to get USB out and HDMI out. Without the dock, you don't have any display output and no way to plug anything into it via USB but power.

    10. Re: Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am rarely posting. I am writing only because I've researched lately for a replacement of my pi2. Rason for replacement: I want to go with docker(&openshift/kubernetes), and most of the prebuild images I want to use are x86.
      My conditions were:
      - x86
      - cheap (max double pi2 price)
      - low power consumption
      - zero noise - passive cooling (even for power supply - aka use laptop charger)
      - reuse an old ssd, and old ram replaced from some laptop upgrades
      - have min 2xsata3
      Optional conditions:
      - ideally new tech (fow low consumption)
      - capable of running win10 (just in case I will need).

      Results of my research:
      AsRock N3150DC-ITX
      - 14 nm(8th Gen). TDP : 6W (4W)
      - All passive (no noise), low power consumption (full board ~18W in idle -> in one year ~20Euro electricity)
      - charger included

      I am not buying any case, I will again reuse an old desktop case.
      http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/N3150DC-ITX/?cat=Specifications
      Possibly other companies have something similar, but I chose this one finally.

    11. Re: Nice! by kenh · · Score: 3, Informative

      I see no indication the dock is not included in the $99 introductory offer, and the review I read on Venturebeat.com clearly indicates the dock is included...

      --
      Ken
    12. Re: Nice! by kenh · · Score: 1

      A machine with specs this low would qualify for 'free' Windows 8.1 with Bing, not sure if there is a similar version of Windows 10.

      --
      Ken
    13. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are quite descent boards

      I need something that works uphill.

    14. Re:Nice! by kheldan · · Score: 0

      While you're at it, you might as well be done with women too. I mean, if you're going to use Linux you should get used to sucking dick and taking it up the ass.

      It's always nice to hear from someone who speaks from a position of knowing what they're talking about because of their long experience with the subject. Perhaps you should write a book on the subject, a sort of 'how-to'?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    15. Re: Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So: No USB3, USB and network on the same bus, incapable of running X86 software, no built-in battery+charging, the case is separate, and the Pi's USB interface is notoriously slow and buggy. I'm a big fan of that board, but I'm also realistic about its shortcomings, as well as its strengths.

    16. Re: Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the newegg.com product page that's not what it says, at all. They are separate products and there isn't an all-in-one with the dock option.

      The Venturebeat article says this first, "The standalone Kangaroo Dock, which you can swap out for other future docks, includes an HDMI port and two USB ports." and later said it was included, but not specifically as a purchase item but only referencing their test/review model.

      The store doesn't include the dock at $99. That's all I said, and that's all the facts on purchasing there is since you can't get it anywhere else at present. I guess we could email InFocus or Newegg and ask.

    17. Re: Nice! by multimediavt · · Score: 2

      I see no indication the dock is not included in the $99 introductory offer, and the review I read on Venturebeat.com clearly indicates the dock is included...

      You better read the Newegg.com reviews because you're totally and completely wrong. No dock included at $99. And the $39 dock is "out of stock". LOL http://www.newegg.com/Product/...

      Bo X.
      10/26/2015 12:56:55 PM
      Tech Level: Somewhat High
      Ownership: less than 1 day
      4 out of 5 eggsLooking forward to it
      Pros: This is a smart phone size computer stick product. It has embodied battery that can support it for 4 hours. The best part is that you can use an iPad as its screen, think of using it on an iPad pro, the experience could be amazing. I have just ordered it, I will post more once I have it.

      Cons: The machine itself does not provide any I/O ports, and what is really ridiculous is that the dock which provides I/O ports is out of stock. How am I supposed to use it without connecting to a display? Wirelessly? If they provide 4G Ram and 64Gb SSD, it will be fine if the price is higher. Obviously, they are not providing that option.

      Did you find this review helpful? Yes No

      Valentin S.
      10/26/2015 11:39:00 AM
      Tech Level: High
      Ownership: less than 1 day
      5 out of 5 eggsIs dock included?
      Pros: Looks like an awesome pocketable Windows 10 PC with the latest Atom CPU, and well-designed and well-built
      Has a fingerprint reader. No more passwords! (Note: this is based on pictures only, I have just ordered the device).

      Cons: No I/O ports without the dock.
      The only storage option is 32GB eMMC, would be nice to have a 64GB version.
      Seems like it has vents. The CPU is only 2W - there should be no vents and definitely no fan, especially with an aluminum case.

      Other Thoughts: Ordered one. The lack of detailed information bothers me, especially the fact that Newegg sells the dock separately and it is already out of stock! How am I supposed to connect everything if the dock is not included?
      Will update the review when I get the device.

    18. Re:Nice! by KGIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or, as I prefer, no OS at all? I don't want (or need) you to put an OS on my box. I can, and will, do that on my own. In fact, it's the first thing I do. If I want BSD then I'll put it on there. If I want Linux, I'll put that on there. If I want Windows, well... Let's not go that far, but you get the idea. I'm happy, capable, and willing to accept any risks and do my own software support, thanks. I don't need an OS installed, I can read the help files if needed. I don't need to have anything pre-configured, thanks, I'd prefer to customize it myself (and probably will) so you're not really saving me any time. I don't want "just works" out of the box. I want what I want to "just work" when I'm done with it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    19. Re: Nice! by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      There's always the option of the fairly similarly priced Beaglebone Black and / or ODROID-C1+.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    20. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is in the same group as netbooks for Windows licensing which means the license only costs $15.

    21. Re:Nice! by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      It's actually a $499 PC. The $99 final cost comes from budgeting $499 for the hardware and $-400 for forcing people to use Windows 10.

    22. Re: Nice! by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Both of the quoted "reviews" are for products on order - neither reviewer has seen, much less opened, the box. OTOH, the Egghead listing explicitly states that the dock is included.

    23. Re:Nice! by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thinks their logo is reminiscent of the Playboy Logo?

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    24. Re: Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unreal! The guy kenh was completely wrong, but his comments get "Informative" while the truth is modded down. /. is a complete shambles. Eff this.

    25. Re: Nice! by jbarr · · Score: 1

      The dock IS included. I received the Kangaroo PC yesterday from Newegg, and it certainly did come with the dock. They have since updated the site to state that.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    26. Re: Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just received mine in the mail, and the dock is included. At $99, from NewEgg

    27. Re: Nice! by kenh · · Score: 1

      My two kangaroo PCs arrived on Friday, both included the dock you claim is 'optional' based on your reading of the newegg page.

      The initial reports are very positive - Win 10 on the quad-core Atom w/ 2 gigs of RAM is quite usable. I'd like a bit more built-in storage, but a microSD card adding 64 Gigs can be had for $20, and it fits inside the case.

      As for your other points:

      Wired Ethernet is not always a suitable replacement for WiFi.

      The simple truth is that the Raspberry Pi:

      does not include a case,
      does not include a power supply,
      does not include wireless networking (wifi or Bluetooth),
      Does not include local storage

      All of those items needed in many/most use cases, and adding them can bring the cost of a raspberry Pi 'system' very close to the $100 introductory price of the Kangaroo.

      --
      Ken
  2. No screen? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    So you carry with you a small spray can of instant screen; spray on any flat surface and the nanomachines released by the spray assemble into an instant lcd, and connect to the unit by radio (would have to be better than bluetooth). When you're done the nanoparticles disassemble, dissolving the screen. Just need that part.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    1. Re:No screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. This device is powered by imagination. Just close your eyes and imagine the colors.

    2. Re:No screen? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I think the main reason for getting something like this would be to use it as a tiny media center PC. You wouldn't need a screen because your TV becomes the screen.

      Of course, whether you're want to use Windows 10 over all the other options is another discussion entirely.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:No screen? by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just get a picoprojector if you can't wait to be somewhere with a screen.

      Since it's a Windows one, you could always access it with your phone or tablet over Teamviewer or other remote methods.

    4. Re:No screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you carry with you a small spray can of instant screen; spray on any flat surface and the nanomachines released by the spray assemble into an instant lcd, and connect to the unit by radio (would have to be better than bluetooth). When you're done the nanoparticles disassemble, dissolving the screen. Just need that part.

      Don't be dense. I, and many other people, already carry a laptop between home and work; nobody cares where work happens as long as it gets done and done well. At each end, I dock it to a 27"+ monitor. The laptop screen seldom, if ever, gets used; 15" monitors went out with the '90s, man. Granted, this device is wimpy for anything other than office work (what do you expect for $99?) but something like this, but more powerful, would be ideal for me.

      (In answer to a not yet given response, like many, I take public transportation, so bulky and heavy workstation type laptops are not particularly desirable.)

    5. Re:No screen? by interval1066 · · Score: 2

      I take public transportation, so bulky and heavy workstation type laptops are not particularly desirable.

      Right, so now you carry two tablets, one this kangaoo thing, the other a tablet so you can see what you're doing with it while on the bus. Very convenient.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    6. Re:No screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Splurge the extra $40 and get an Intel NUC or something though...

    7. Re:No screen? by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      I'd get a pico keyboard and pico mouse as well rather than use Teamviewer or other Windows remote methods remote methods

    8. Re:No screen? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      If I could just plug it into a KVM, or with a small cable connect to my tablet, it would work fine. Finding a display device isn't an insurmountable problem.

      Of course, if you can get us the spray on screen, that would be awesome too.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:No screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the main reason for getting something like this would be to use it as a tiny media center PC. You wouldn't need a screen because your TV becomes the screen.

      This device would be ideal for workplaces where employees are forced to "hotel" and never know at which workstation they will be sitting. Much safer than a notebook in terms of security unless the theft has a dock at hand. Imagine working at the office, you leave for the day/night, get home and plug into a waiting dock to continue working. Supporting these devices at hotels offering "office space" would be great for business travellers; just plug-in the device to the dock and begin working without additional worries about malware.

    10. Re: No screen? by kenh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Did you notice this is from Infocus? They are in the business of selling projectors, I think this is being viewed as a portable PowerPoint machine.

      --
      Ken
    11. Re: No screen? by kenh · · Score: 1

      It includes support for being controlled by an iOS device.

      --
      Ken
    12. Re: No screen? by kenh · · Score: 1

      This device is the same size as a 2.5" laptop drive, is that really so bulky?

      --
      Ken
    13. Re:No screen? by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      So you carry with you a small spray can of instant screen

      Yes: it's called an HMD or an iPad.

    14. Re:No screen? by mrlinux11 · · Score: 1

      You can do the same thing with a Raspberry Pi for less money.

    15. Re: No screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It includes support for being controlled by an iOS device."

      The absolute worst thing to be controlled by is an iOS device, at least for androids, they're worse than humans.

    16. Re:No screen? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2

      You can just replace the LCD screen with an LSD screen.

    17. Re:No screen? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was the best choice - just that there are applications where you don't need a screen with your PC.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    18. Re: No screen? by kenh · · Score: 1

      If I could just plug it into a KVM

      VGA HDMI is an easy problem to overcome, and a single USB connection for keyboard/mouse is included on the base. Why do you think this won't hook up to your KVM?

      --
      Ken
    19. Re:No screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, so now you carry two tablets, one this kangaoo thing, the other a tablet so you can see what you're doing with it while on the bus. Very convenient.

      You fail miserably at reading comprehension, lad. The whole point is that I, and most other people, do *not* use a laptop on public transportation. It's a crappy experience if you're trying to get work done.

    20. Re: No screen? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Phantom console.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    21. Re: No screen? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I don't think it won't. In fact, I assume it will.

      I'm explicitly saying lack of a display isn't an insurmountable problem.

      That you think that I think this won't hook up to a KVM ... well, that's entirely your own damned problem. Because I never said that.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    22. Re:No screen? by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 2

      But why would you need the battery (just one more thing to swell up and explode) and why would you want all that bulk when you could just get one of these?

      --
      Rawr
    23. Re: No screen? by kenh · · Score: 1

      So sorry, but the "if" at the beginning of your post made it read like a question - perhaps rhetorical, but a question none the less.

      --
      Ken
    24. Re:No screen? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I see another advantage. The airport thugs don't know that it can function as a laptop, so you van get away with leaving one of these in your bag, with the tablet you use as a screen. I love living in the future!

    25. Re:No screen? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Its not that bad, I do it. Rather have my one device that does what I need than two.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    26. Re: No screen? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Not that much less - add a case, power supply, 32 gig sad card, wifi/Bluetooth and you are heading towards $100. You can argue the value of the 4 HR battery and win 10 license included, and adding keyboard/mouse and display are common costs for either platform.

      The RPi seems cheaper than this because it starts at $40, but it needs a fair bit of additional items to be ready for most applications.

      --
      Ken
    27. Re: No screen? by mrlinux11 · · Score: 1

      You do not need wifi/bluetooth for a desktop

  3. Timothy getting a commission from Newegg now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    "Company X selling New Product Y at Store Z for Price $foo!" -- News for nerds. Stuff that matters (to some of them. maybe.)

    1. Re:Timothy getting a commission from Newegg now? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      Or maybe some of us might want to buy one and Newegg is the only place that sells it right now?

    2. Re:Timothy getting a commission from Newegg now? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What kind of moron would want to buy something that runs Windows 10?

    3. Re: Timothy getting a commission from Newegg now? by kenh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone that wants a small computer to tuck in their projector bag for sales presentations.

      Anyone that wants to setup a kiosk.

      Anyone that wants to run Windows apps 'on' their iPad (includes software for iPad to act as keyboard/screen for this wifi/Bluetooth enabled computer).

      Anyone that wants to embrace the idea of 'hot desks' in their office without buying scads of laptops.

      Anyone that wants to put an inexpensive presentation system in a conference room (just add Bluetooth keyboard/mouse and connect to large flat panel/projector).

      --
      Ken
    4. Re:Timothy getting a commission from Newegg now? by tepples · · Score: 2

      What kind of moron would want to buy something that runs Windows

      Somebody who wants an affordable[1] PC with a multi-window window manager[2] and no prompt to wipe the drive every time it is turned on,[3] possibly running the occasional Windows app,[4] in a shape or size that System76 does not offer.

      [1] Not a Mac
      [2] Not a stock Android tablet
      [3] Not a Chromebook with Crouton
      [4] Not an ARM box, which can't run Wine

    5. Re: Timothy getting a commission from Newegg now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone that wants a small computer to tuck in their projector bag for sales presentations.

      I can already do this with my phone! The only thing needed in the bag is the adapter.

      Anyone that wants to setup a kiosk.

      RPi is cheaper and can do more.

      Anyone that wants to run Windows apps 'on' their iPad (includes software for iPad to act as keyboard/screen for this wifi/Bluetooth enabled computer).

      What windows apps would you want or need to run on your iPad that you couldn't get access to via something like CloudOn? What Windows apps would be needed to view or edit files on an iPad? Makes no sense to anyone that actually owns and uses an iPad. There are apps for that stuff already, way cheaper than a $99 POS.

      Anyone that wants to embrace the idea of 'hot desks' in their office without buying scads of laptops.

      Yeah, because that has worked out so well for the people that have already embraced that virtual office BS. It works for certain business units in certain circumstances. Besides, if you're doing "hot desks" then you're also likely to be doing a BYOD policy so you wouldn't be buying laptops for people anyway, if you're using the ultra lean model of office space usage.

      Anyone that wants to put an inexpensive presentation system in a conference room (just add Bluetooth keyboard/mouse and connect to large flat panel/projector).

      Again, RPi can do that, too. For less. Besides, if you're going to have heavy hitters in your conference room, a real machine is going to be needed anyway to support the graphics, memory and storage needs, or the presenter will have their own machine to plug in (which is the most frequent case in reality) so a machine in the room is superfluous.

      This thing has no market except for gadget hoarders and really poor people that cannot afford a smartphone. It's doomed.

    6. Re:Timothy getting a commission from Newegg now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...And there isn't anything that fills those needs but runs a non-Windows OS? Moron.

    7. Re:Timothy getting a commission from Newegg now? by tepples · · Score: 1

      ..And there isn't anything that fills those needs but runs a non-Windows OS?

      You can take your chances with whatever Debian derivative is popular at any given time, but doing this with some recent Atom chipsets will result in a laptop that does not Just Work. You'll likely end up having to buy and connect an external mouse, keyboard, flash drive, and supported USB NIC through a hub so that you can download kernel sources, download patches, apply the patches, and recompile and install the kernel, just to get a machine's keyboard, trackpad, and Wi-Fi working. And even with all that, some hardware features still may not work.

      Moron.

      Please cool it with the personal attacks.

  4. IBM's Metacard redux by WillAdams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People keep doing this sort of thing. IBM had Metacard, there was Oqo, and wasn't there a Palm device which was viewed as mostly a media storage device?

    Why not go ahead and add a touch screen (and a stylus) so that one can use it w/o needing to cable up?

    I use a Toshiba Encore 2 Write 10 as my main system in pretty much this way, connecting when I don't wish to use the touch screen / stylus to a full-size keyboard and monitor (fortunately, Toshiba provided an adapter for the single USB port which affords two connections, one for charging, one for devices).

    The functionality I'd really like to see is this sort of thing done as an iPhone / iPod Touch sized unit ---- Apple could take their laptop, make the trackpad a removable unit which was exactly the size of an iPhone/iPod Touch, and one could replace the trackpad w/ the portable device which would then function as a customizable trackpad and which would load the user directory and backup the portable device.

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, but you missed the best part. If you need a "truly mobile solution," you can use their iPad app and link up with an iPad, so you can use Windows 10 on the Kangaroo... using an iPad as your input.

      Christ, the midrange iPad has better specs than this thing and a better operating system. Why not just sell adaptors to let the iPad connect to all your desktop peripherals? Would make so much more fucking sense.

    2. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      The functionality I'd really like to see is this sort of thing done as an iPhone / iPod Touch sized unit ---- Apple could take their laptop, make the trackpad a removable unit which was exactly the size of an iPhone/iPod Touch

      The iphone already has a large "trackpad". The only thing really needed is a vga/hdmi out on the iphone and when you connect the monitor, the entire phone becomes your trackpad. This solves the "mouse" issue. Now, all you need is a keyboard and monitor where ever you want to use it.
      I believe microsoft recently came out with such a device. Not sure what it was called. A cellphone with a video out would probably be adequate for many people. The main problem I see is that most desktop apps I want to use are windows/linux while most portable apps are iphone/android. It's not the form factor, the speed, or the technology that would be the problem for me but the split ecosystem.

    3. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. But this is fanless, comes preloaded with the latest windows, and costs a hundred bucks. Its a full computer that fits in your pocket and is fully in impulse buy range.

      It's based on Intel's newer cheap SoC platforms - Why is this important? Because they're fucking amazing. Fanless, extremely low power, no moving parts whatsoever. Windows boots in seconds and runs really well. No lag with lots of chrome tabs open, 1080p streamed video. Office runs without a hitch. (Windows 10 uses less memory than either 7 or 8.1 too)

      They run linux too, but Microsoft has pulled their head out of their ass and realized you can't charge 200 bucks for windows on a PC that costs 60 bucks to make. - Sell it cheap and make it up on services.

    4. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, the problem is exactly the keyboard. For a few years, I traveled with a very small laptop, full size Bluetooth keyboard and VGA cable. Then in a bit of drunkenness I hacked a small form factor PC into the bottom of a keyboard. Heat problems killed it -- having the heat sink on my leg precisely. Now it's a tablet PC, Bluetooth keyboard and mouse, and HDMI to the hotel TV. Big screen for bad eyes, can stream video to it, and I still have a laptop'ish thing to take to meetings if I need to.

    5. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but it runs Windows 10. Nobody seems to want Windows 10.

    6. Re: IBM's Metacard redux by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Because you might want to run real software, not just little self-contained 'apps' that are all packaged up like miniature Halloween candy bars.

    7. Re: IBM's Metacard redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'seem' is a funny word...

    8. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Sure, but it runs Windows 10. Only a complete fool would run Windows 10 with its integrated spyware. So this alone makes the device completely worthless.

    9. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      The Toshiba doesn't have a fan, neither did the Asus Vivotab Note 8 which it replaced (and that was ~$150 refurbished, so, as you noted, impulse buy territory).

      I could install Windows 10, but it seems to be a real downgrade for Tablet devices, so I'm still waiting to do that.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    10. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was describing:

        - remove trackpad from laptop
        - slot in iPhone --- use it as trackpad, use the laptop's keyboard, display and processor

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    11. Re: IBM's Metacard redux by kenh · · Score: 1

      Apple could take their laptop, make the trackpad a removable unit which was exactly the size of an iPhone/iPod Touch

      You do know Apple sells a Bluetooth-enabled wireless trackpad, right?

      --
      Ken
    12. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      What I'd like is not to have to carry around an extra device at all -- my cell phone is already in my pocket just about all the time, and these days it's got enough power to work a basic desktop computer, the only drawback is that its small size makes its user interactions less efficient than what a full desktop can provide.

      So the ideal usage pattern would be: I walk over to a keyboard/mouse/monitor that is sitting somewhere, sit down in front of it, and my cell phone (still in my pocket) connects to the keyboard/mouse/monitor wirelessly and presents me with a login screen. I do my work as I would at any computer, and then when I'm done, I get up and leave, and the pairing dissolves and the screen goes dark. All my data and computing state stays in my pocket with me. Same thing happens wherever I go.

      Of course there are security concerns that would need to be ironed out, so it probably wouldn't be quite that seamless, but that's the ideal.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    13. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by Coren22 · · Score: 0

      The same integrated spyware which has been on most Microsoft products under the title "Customer Experience Improvement Program". OMG, those horrible people at Microsoft.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    14. Re: IBM's Metacard redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it doesn't fit into a laptop, it doesn't have a customizable colour screen, and it doesn't ensure that one's iPhone/iPod Touch gets backed up, nor does it facilitate using the iPhone/iPod to indicate which account should be used on the laptop.

    15. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by sensei+moreh · · Score: 1

      No need for the mouse. Pull the cell phone out of your pocket. The cell phone's screen becomes the trackpad

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
    16. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it also includes a fingerprint reader, so you can improve your experience by giving MS your fingerprints too. Who would not want to do that?

    17. Re:IBM's Metacard redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that we are well into a decade of "sufficient gigahertz" in computing, which is why smartphones and tablets are all the rage. And the SSD maximizes comparitively paltry CPUs so that the user doesn't care.

      Previous attempts to do this probably didn't have SSD storage or didn't have the vast accumulated SOC infrastructure and momentum that the smartphone industry has brought us.

      That's why this form factor is here to stay.

  5. Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Soooo . . . like a Raspberry Pi, then? Except for the Windows bit, of course.

    1. Re:Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your point being? Or since the Raspberry Pi is like numerous other products before it we should have shrugged it off too?
       
      Or are you one of those people who think that since YOU first got introduced to this form factor with the Pi that everyone is just a rip off of the Pi?
       
      I bet you think Tesla invented AC and Newton was the first person to ever notice gravity too, huh?

    2. Re:Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait...Tesla invented air conditioning? Man, he really DID get ripped off!

    3. Re:Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Your point being? Or since the Raspberry Pi is like numerous other products before it we should have shrugged it off too?

      I did shrug it off after I actually tried it and found it far less exiting than I thought I would. It was interesting in that it was really cheap and was a platform that couldn't run Windows. Beyond that, I didn't find it terribly useful.

      Also, what kind of idiot thinks that the PI "invented" this kind of form factor?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my guess, the same kind of idiot who thinks that this machine being "like a Raspberry Pi" is a relevant addition to the conversation.

    5. Re:Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Raspberry Pi 2 runs Windows 10.

    6. Re:Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by omnichad · · Score: 1
    7. Re: Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Soooo . . . like a Raspberry Pi, then? Except for the Windows bit, of course.

      And the case.

      And the power supply

      And the wifi.

      And the Bluetooth.

      And the 32 gig built-in storage.

      And the quad-core x86 cpu....

      Yeah, aside from those differences, 'just like a raspberry pi'

      --
      Ken
    8. Re:Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      There is now a Windows 10 version that runs on the Pi, but it has no GUI, so it isn't terribly useful.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    9. Re:Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      No GUI on Windows 10 IoT, so pretty much useless for most things.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re: Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Wow, no gui so it isn't very useful...

      Computers serve functions other than displaying things on a screen for end-users...

      --
      Ken
    11. Re: Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Did you miss that this thread was comparing the Kangaroo to the Pi as a desktop/laptop type device? Are you saying that the Pi with no GUI is just as useful as the Kangaroo with a GUI?

      Frankly, something with a GUI can do everything that something without can do, plus it can do GUI stuff, so what you say changes nothing about the usefulness of the Pi running Windows 10 IoT.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    12. Re:Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A comment on a Slashdot that reckons a GUI-less computer is useless?? Isn't that the beauty and power of Linux?

    13. Re:Like a Raspberry Pi, then? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      A comment on Slashdot that reckons GUI-less WINDOWS is useless. There is a difference, Linux was designed from the ground up to run GUI-less, Windows kinda sorta works GUI-less.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  6. Windows 10? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Windows 10? No thanks. Is this supposed to be InFocus/Microsoft's version of a Mac Mini or something? Two gigs of RAM, 32 GB of hard drive space... it's not a Mac Mini by a damned sight, but more like a Chrome Book without a screen or keyboard or convenience. Four hours of battery life if you're lucky, which might get you through a presentation but not a long flight. Oh, wait, you couldn't use this on a plane because there's no input or output, just sockets for you to connect shit that you can't carry with you conveniently.

    I'm wondering where the advantage is over a cheap 100-200 laptop... Walmart has a laptop on clearance with the same RAM and storage but also with a keyboard and screen.

    1. Re: Windows 10? Really? by kenh · · Score: 2

      Oh, wait, you couldn't use this on a plane because there's no input or output, just sockets for you to connect shit that you can't carry with you conveniently.

      You didn't bother to read the product description, did you? The computer includes a microSD slot to increase storage, and it comes bundled with an iOS app that lets you control (screen, Keyboard, mouse) this computer wirelessly from your iPad... This computer could be in your carry-on luggage and you can access it in your seat below wirelessly.

      Of course, increasing the battery life would require finding some way to provide this unit with an external power source, through it's micro USB port - I wonder if anyone sells USB batteries?

      --
      Ken
    2. Re: Windows 10? Really? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Is this supposed to be InFocus/Microsoft's version of a Mac Mini or something? Two gigs of RAM, 32 GB of hard drive space... it's not a Mac Mini by a damned sight, but more like a Chrome Book without a screen or keyboard or convenience.

      Who said Mac mini?

      It's a computer without a display, sold by a company that, wait for it, ALREADY sells displays.

      --
      Ken
  7. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You should see my mobile basketball court. Well... it's just a ball really.

  8. The Only Amazing Thing About it is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That it Made the News.

    Small PC's have been around for ages. Is the news that this has Win 10 on it?

  9. Re:Windows 10? Really? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    I can't understand who this is for either. I mean Infocus so I guess its for presentations. If you can cable up a display or projector how likely is it you need a battery? What the hell is the point in that? Are supposed to pair with a portable battery powered projector? Is there really a market for people who need to give a enough presentations in places without basic instructor to buy this thing?

    In every other use case I can think of and in fact even giving presentations its hard to imagine you'd not be better off with a gently used laptop for about the same money. A media PC, sure I guess for streaming but if you want to do that might as well use RPi or if you don't want to bother DIYing it at all a Chrome-cast or Amazon stick for less money.

    This is like a Pet rock with a shitty PC inside it.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  10. So... by pushing-robot · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's just like a NUC, or Compute Stick, or any of dozens of other micro PCs.

    Wait, this one has a battery, but I'm not sure how much of a feature that is when you need an external monitor anyway. I guess it gets you through power hiccoughs?

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:So... by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      The battery means you don't have to shut down and reboot. You can suspend and leave all of your applications open.

    2. Re:So... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You talk as if hibernate hasn't existed for the best part of 15 years. If this uses high-speed storage you should be able to get to the desktop in seconds without your software being affected.

    3. Re:So... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Wait, this one has a battery, but I'm not sure how much of a feature that is when you need an external monitor anyway.

      Monitors, keyboards and mice are ubiquitous. Power supplies with the right voltage and current less so. And before you talk about micro-usb chargers I invite you to look on the RaspberryPi forums about the complaints with the myriad of powersupplies which don't work because the power isn't good enough and the instabilities that causes.

      It does come with a powersupply too but of course that adds bulk compared to something that could fit into a coat pocket.

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Setup a VNC server and remote in from your smartphone.

  11. old is the new new by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    There's no short supply of small form factor PCs. What about the Raspberry pi, that /. loves to talk about?

    1. Re:old is the new new by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the Raspberry Pi 2 model A+

  12. Oblig... by werepants · · Score: 0

    Does it run Linux?

    Seriously, though - sounds like a great setup for a low power HTPC.

  13. Connect to any screen you already have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooh, I can connect it to any screen I already have, as long as its HDMI, or I buy additional adapters?

    1. Re:Connect to any screen you already have by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Be serious. If you still have a VGA-only monitor, it's time to replace it. And a DVI-D to HDMI adapter is simple enough to be worth only a few dollars.

    2. Re:Connect to any screen you already have by vux984 · · Score: 1

      The industry could make large strides towards retiring VGA if they would just stop making "VGA-only" monitors. You can still buy them today, from all the major brands.

      Yes, the odd use case requires VGA, I'm not saying they should stop selling monitors that support VGA. I'm not even saying VGA should be removed from the monitor... just stop making and selling LED/LCD monitors that ONLY do VGA.

    3. Re:Connect to any screen you already have by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Not too long ago, I needed an small monitor for work, so I went to my local office supply store, and picked up a small, cheapo monitor. It wasn't until I got it home and tried to plug it in that I realized it was VGA-ONLY. Yeah, a brand-new Dell monitor. WTF, are you kidding me? I mean, my fault for not checking the specs first (I assumed any new monitor would have DVI ports at minimum), but seriously? VGA monitors are apparently not dead yet - they're still selling them as we speak. Lame.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    4. Re:Connect to any screen you already have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This tablet-monstrosity is InFocus. They also make projectors for presentations: it's their bread and butter. They all have VGA connectors, even the newest ones that also have HDMI.

      Go to a college campus and look at the speakers' podiums in every classroom and lecture hall and meeting room and in random spots in the library. Colleges have hundreds of projectors. All of them are wired to the VGA port on the projector, and all provide the speaker with a VGA port. Only.

      VGA is not going away soon. A dongle will be necessary for most people.

      For this piece of shit, though, here's what you need:

      1) If you're working on it in a mobile situation, you need an iPad to use their app. Then you can have Windows on your iPad, sort of, but with the Kangaroo on your lap too, because you want two tablets instead of one in order to be mobile, and because the Kangaroo's hardware is worse than the iPad that you're using as a thin-client.

      2) If you're presenting, you need a dongle and some input device to click to the next slide and start your presentation and whatnot. So, iPad again, unless you want to disassemble your client's computer to reuse his keyboard or schlep along your own. Forget that on a college campus, where the keyboard and mouse are plugged into some unreachable and locked-away part of the computer. Never mind that the iPad (your input for the Kangaroo) with a dongle could do the presenting without the Kangaroo, or the iPad with a projector that does wireless with either AirPlay or the manufacturer's app. Oh, yeah, and Powerpoint and Apple's Keynote both exist for the iPad.

      3) If you're at a desk, you need peripherals that connect to your Kangaroo. Keyboard, mouse, monitor, etc. This is somehow so much more convenient than a laptop, because BUY OUR FUCKING PRODUCT.

      It's like they took the worst of cloud-computing and thin-client computing (your files are on a different machine, you have to connect to it from another computer that acts as your client) and stuffed it into a take-along personal computer with no built-in input or output devices. It's like they fired the engineers and designers and put the marketing team in charge of production, except that marketers would have actually made a presentation at some point in their lives, so I guess they just put the janitor in charge because he at least couldn't be outsourced so had to be promoted.

    5. Re:Connect to any screen you already have by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      What's lame is lack of dual VGA on graphics card, or worse : most graphics cards and all nvidia ones still have one VGA, some recent AMD ones have none. DVI-I counted as a VGA output for the purpose of this post.

      There are HDMI to VGA and Displayport to VGA adapters, the latter have crashed in price thanksfully (used to be 100€ and they seem to be available for 10€ or less) now what's needed is Displayport on 30€ graphics cards and 50€ motherboards it works both for 4K freaks and CRT freaks dammit.

  14. I'd say the primary use is non-portable by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My parents have a tiny little box like this. Why? Because they are getting old and won't be looking at a 10" screen and fiddle with microscopic virtual buttons or cramped keyboards 2mm deep. Huge monitor, full size keyboard and mouse but in terms of computing power their needs are practically non-existant. Sure it could be a laptop, but the lid would be closed 99.9% of the time so why bother.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re: I'd say the primary use is non-portable by kenh · · Score: 1

      Meet the latest version of WebTV

      --
      Ken
    2. Re: I'd say the primary use is non-portable by avocanite · · Score: 1

      The specs on this arent far from the intel compute stick - i've had two of them, and there are positive/negative aspects to them, but i can't picture why i'd want one of these weakly-performing mini pc's as opposed to my current weakly-performing compute stick thats the size as a chromecast

    3. Re:I'd say the primary use is non-portable by jbarr · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%! I'm thinking the same thing for my parents who are moving from a house into a rather small independent living facility where space is at a premium. Having a tiny box like this connected to a decent monitor with full keyboard and mouse would certainly help them. And it would serve ALL of their computing needs. (At 87 and 90 years old, they only focus on Web surfing, creating and printing letters, and playing Freecell.) I just received mine yesterday, but it was DOA so I sent it back for exchange. When I get a working one, I'll put it through its paces and determine if it is something appropriate for my parents.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  15. Re:Windows 10? Really? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    If you can cable up a display or projector how likely is it you need a battery?

    In the hotel, you connect it to the TV in the room, which usually has HDMI now. In the meeting room, you connect it to their projector, or to your own portable battery-operated unit. I presume InFocus makes one of those, too, but I don't work for them so I'm not going to look it up.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. And not a laptop why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For when you want the inconvenience of either needing wherever you are to already have all of these peripherals, or carrying them around yourself.

    1. Re:And not a laptop why? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      For when you want the inconvenience of either needing wherever you are to already have all of these peripherals, or carrying them around yourself.

      What I see is a way to own a Windows 10 PC without the biggest major drawback -- having to look at it.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re: And not a laptop why? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Yo understand this device is being offered by Infocus, the projector people, right? Perhaps they view this as a device which compliments their current offerings?

      How long before they sell projectors with built-in docking bays for these devices?

      --
      Ken
  17. Wait a minute... by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  18. Re:Windows 10? Really? by PRMan · · Score: 1

    I got an HP Stream 7 for the same price (same specs) and it has a screen. It's nice to carry a portable 7" Windows 10 full desktop OS around with you sometimes.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  19. Windows retail prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I can buy Windows 10 Home Edition for $100, or a complete computer with Windows 10 Home Edition on it for $100. What?

    1. Re:Windows retail prices by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      The price marks this as a "low powered" device.

      For low powered devices, Winders is free. Kind of a "lets get you hooked until you want a REAL machine" kind of thing. This breaks down as now these "low powered" machines now can beat a desktop from a few years ago.

    2. Re:Windows retail prices by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The price marks this as a "low powered" device.

      For low powered devices, Winders is free. Kind of a "lets get you hooked until you want a REAL machine" kind of thing. This breaks down as now these "low powered" machines now can beat a desktop from a few years ago.

      It also breaks down because it's a Sherman act violation.[1] I wonder how long it will take the DoJ to get around to prosecuting, or will the EU need to step in again?

      [1] Dumping. Illegal under the Sherman and Clayton acts.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  20. Phablet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well there is it, the dumbest thing I've read all day.

  21. If I just need that one app in Wine by tepples · · Score: 0

    If you want to run Linux, buy something ARM-based

    That's fine for people who use only applications that are Free and native. But others may need just that one application that's only available for Windows but runs correctly in Wine on an x86 PC, and ARM isn't for them.

    There are quite descent boards

    But do they run Descent?

    1. Re:If I just need that one app in Wine by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't expect many of those "other apps" to run terribly well on a $100 x86 PC. This is probably not something that will be a suitable gateway for all of those Windows legacy apps unless it's through running an RDP client.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:If I just need that one app in Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But do they run Descent?"

      They do actually since it was open sourced years ago.

    3. Re:If I just need that one app in Wine by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      I'm browsing Slashdot right now on an Atom processor. Until a few minutes ago I was dicking around at Civilization 5 (set to minimum standards and at less than 1080p, but still). $100 processor computers have reached the point that they're "good enough" for 90%+ of users.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    4. Re: If I just need that one app in Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the fact that Office, Adobe, and just about every company bespoke app won't work on them. Yknow, the stuff that those 90% of people need to use to get any work done.

    5. Re: If I just need that one app in Wine by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Office does indeed work on an Atom processor, I use it all the time! It's just a normal x86 processor...

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    6. Re:If I just need that one app in Wine by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't expect many of those "other apps" to run terribly well on a $100 x86 PC. This is probably not something that will be a suitable gateway for all of those Windows legacy apps unless it's through running an RDP client.

      Running something "not terribly well" is still better than not at all, which is the alternative if going with an ARM processor. And while many applications won't run well, many will run fine.

      I do think that you may be underestimating how well this PC will run. While you wouldn't want to do highly complex stats jobs on it, it will be fine for applications that are more user-interface based (which tend to idle while waiting for user input). They will be especially fine for those legacy Windows apps that some companies have been running for years and just can't seem to shake off. At my company we have a program that started its life back on Windows 3.1. It runs like a champ on anything that you can buy today.

    7. Re:If I just need that one app in Wine by Bugamn · · Score: 1

      Well, there is an open source port for Descent, so maybe? I guess it depends on which libraries it needs.

  22. Is 15" too big or too small? by tepples · · Score: 1

    15" monitors went out with the '90s, man. [But] like many, I take public transportation, so bulky and heavy workstation type laptops are not particularly desirable.

    Are you trying to imply that 15" is too big or too small? If too small, then how do you get work done on your bus/train ride to and from work? If you don't expect to actually pull out your laptop on the bus, you could just carry a 32 GB USB flash drive to and from work and use the computers you already have.

    1. Re:Is 15" too big or too small? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If too small, then how do you get work done on your bus/train ride to and from work?

      Has anyone here ever actually tried to use a laptop on a bus? Good luck getting any work done.

      If you don't expect to actually pull out your laptop on the bus, you could just carry a 32 GB USB flash drive to and from work and use the computers you already have.

      Oh, goody, I can carry around my files but not any of the expensive proprietary software installed on the work PC necessary to actually work on those files. How useful. </sarcasm>

  23. Very similar to the Quantum Byte by jandjmh · · Score: 1

    This is a useful form factor for some niche applications. The Quantum Byte is a bit more money, but has ethernet, and the I/O ports are all built in - no dock. No battery either. I've used two of these: one sitting in a closet running the client software of a cloud based backup service. The tiny PC backs up the NAS it is sitting next to. I put VNC on the little PC and run it without any attached peripherals at all. The other one is sitting in the server room of a larger business and is connected to the systems there as an alternate way to access them that does not depend on the servers being up.
    As others have mentioned it would also serve as a fine little media PC. I could see my parents using it as a full on home computer that was dead quiet, booted nearly instantly, and runs full versions of desktop apps. They have, and like, tablets for casual web browsing, but sometimes they want a big screen and a regular keyboard.

    1. Re: Very similar to the Quantum Byte by kenh · · Score: 1

      I need a computer to run a small windows-only application of trivial size, hooked to a ham radio for remote control purposes. This computer fits the bill nicely, since the radio I hope to control only needs one USB port, and while wifi isn't my preferred connection type, it will work, or a USB Ethernet dongle should work just fine.

      I agree, those trying to cast this as the next big thing (and mocking it for falling short) are missing the point - for select use cases, this is an attractive platform, no one said it is a desktop/laptop/tablet replacement device.

      --
      Ken
    2. Re: Very similar to the Quantum Byte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need a computer to run a small windows-only application of trivial size, hooked to a ham radio for remote control purposes. This computer fits the bill nicely, since the radio I hope to control only needs one USB port, and while wifi isn't my preferred connection type, it will work, or a USB Ethernet dongle should work just fine.

      I agree, those trying to cast this as the next big thing (and mocking it for falling short) are missing the point - for select use cases, this is an attractive platform, no one said it is a desktop/laptop/tablet replacement device.

      What's wrong with a Raspberry Pi for your needs? Cheaper and does all the same stuff, and more. There are also surplus property auctions and thrift stores where you can get older, yet still usable hardware for your needs. This thing would have been great ten years ago. Today, it's not going to compete with established, cheaper alternatives. And yes, the product website is specifically marketing it as a portable "desktop/laptop/tablet replacement device". The product is doomed as it is targeting a market that doesn't exist for a problem that was solved with the advent of the modern smartphone or hobbyist/maker hardware like the Raspberry Pi.

    3. Re: Very similar to the Quantum Byte by kenh · · Score: 1

      Seriously, did you see this first line:

      I need a computer to run a small windows-only application of trivial

      Raspberry Pi doesn't run x86 Windows executables.

      At $100 including case, ps, storage device, and wifi it is cost-competitive with Raspberry Pi.

      An older desktop is what it will be replacing - old PCs collect dust, cat hair, etc and require cleaning, tend to rely on many spinning bits (fans, HDs), and if the hard drive dies, not an unreasonable thing for an off-lease desktop, you are looking at $40-60 for a replacement.

      Oh, and power cost for a 24x7 kangaroo is much less than an old P4/Core 2 Duo desktop.

      --
      Ken
  24. Intel compute stick by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Seriously, though - sounds like a great setup for a low power HTPC.

    You can get an Intel HDMI Compute Stick with way much better specs at nearly similar price point.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re: Intel compute stick by kenh · · Score: 1

      The Intel HDMI compute sick does not include a battery and ONLY works when attached to an HDMI monitor... And sells for the same price ($100 +/-)

      --
      Ken
    2. Re: Intel compute stick by kenh · · Score: 1

      Which specs are 'way much better' on the Intel HDMI compute stick? Similar CPU, RAM, and storage space AFAIK from a quick review of the specs...

      --
      Ken
    3. Re: Intel compute stick by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1

      If you're using it for an HTPC then how is any of that a problem? The battery is just one more component to degrade and cause problems, and it's totally unnecessary since if you lose power you've probably lost your TV too.

      --
      Rawr
    4. Re: Intel compute stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you can't connect the compute stick to your iPad and use it just about anywhere.

    5. Re:Intel compute stick by xlsior · · Score: 1

      You can get an Intel HDMI Compute Stick with way much better specs at nearly similar price point.

      On intel's compute stick page ( https://www-ssl.intel.com/cont... ) it only lists one processor configuration, the Atom Z3735F. That CPU scores 905 of the Passmark CPU benchmark (cpubenchmark.net)

      By comparison, the the Kangaroo uses a x5-z8500 processsor, which scores 1,652 on the same tests.

      If anything, the kangaroo has almost twice the processing power of the compute stick.

  25. That one app that Apple won't let them port by tepples · · Score: 1

    the midrange iPad has better specs than this thing and a better operating system.

    Until you need to use that one app that isn't ported to iPad, possibly because Apple won't let its developer distribute such a port through the App Store.

  26. Even more useless by DrYak · · Score: 1

    That sounds really familiar.

    Well, at least the Atari used to have a keyboard, so it could be used as a transportable desktop, you can move it around and need only to plug it into any TV.

    TFA's device doesn't have any input, so you need to supply your own keyboard and mouse.

    So it isn't as much like Atari/Amiga/Commodore compute of past history, as much as yet another variation of Raspberry Pi, Asus eee, Intel NUC, Intel HDMI compute stick, etc. only with much shittier specs.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Even more useless by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I see. But if it doesn't have any input devices or display devices, how is it different from carrying around a micro ATX computer?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  27. Power hiccups happen by tepples · · Score: 1

    Wait, this one has a battery, but I'm not sure how much of a feature that is when you need an external monitor anyway.

    That depends on whether there are enough plugs for the external monitor but not for the computer. This might happen, say, if you're using an existing TV as a monitor and can bum an HDMI cable off a game console or cable box but don't want to fool around with finding an outlet. Or it might happen if you're connecting to a projector but don't want to run a power cord that someone can trip over.

    I guess it gets you through power hiccoughs?

    Having had a four-second power outage at home last night, I can attest to the convenience of always having a UPS with me. All the applications on my laptop stayed open, and two minutes later the Internet came back. But that's when I usually discover that the backup batteries in a lot of the clocks around the house have run out.

  28. lots of those around by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    There are lots of these small, portable computers around. People like them because they can take their compute environment with them between work and home, because they can tape one of these to the back of their TV, etc.

    At $99, this looks like a pretty good deal for an Intel-based computer. If you want to run Linux and are happy with an ARM, of course, a Raspberry Pi or Beaglebone is better and cheaper.

  29. Trade the battery for 2GB more ram. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Trade the battery for 2GB more ram.

    2GB system is to low.

    1. Re:Trade the battery for 2GB more ram. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their marketing also claims 4K video playback. Battery at 4 hours with casual use. If the power does go out, good luck with your screen.

  30. 10-15 years late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i remember an aopen or some such from early winxp days that was basically the same thing. super-mini everything but keyboard, mouse, monitor, with desktop chip and windows inside... but with a real spinny hard drive not shit flash storage, shittier atom cpu, and shittiest windows evar...

  31. Audio out, HDMI patents, and HDCP DRM by tepples · · Score: 1

    I can think of a few cost reasons to make VGA-only monitors:

    • HDMI sends audio information in the blanking period. VGA has no need for an audio DAC or output jack.
    • HDMI is patented and has royalties.
    • HDMI certification requires implementation of HDCP, which has royalties and compliance costs.
    1. Re:Audio out, HDMI patents, and HDCP DRM by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      1. There is HDMI monitors without speakers.
      2. Are DVI and DisplayPort patented with royalties?
      3. As far as I know DVI and Displayport don't have HDCP, so no royalties and compliance costs either.

    2. Re:Audio out, HDMI patents, and HDCP DRM by vux984 · · Score: 1

      HDMI sends audio information in the blanking period. VGA has no need for an audio DAC or output jack.

      Lots of HDMI devices don't do anything with audio. I have HDMI capable screens that have no audio support whatsoever.

      HDMI is patented and has royalties.
      HDMI certification requires implementation of HDCP, which has royalties and compliance costs.

      So don't do HDMI if its that big a deal
      Sell DVI + VGA
      Or Displayport + VGA
      Actually they ALREADY do that.
      They just need to drop the VGA-only SKU.

      How much do you really think a DVI or displayport or even an HDMI port adds to the cost of a screen anyway?

      I doubt it costs more than a buck; and if you go to newegg or anywhere else and shop the budget $85 monitor price point there are plenty of options of "D-sub only" and "D-sub + DVI" at the same price point; so at the retail level the "extra cost" of adding a digital port is lost in the noise. I expect its pretty close to lost in the noise at the manufacturing point too.

    3. Re:Audio out, HDMI patents, and HDCP DRM by tepples · · Score: 1

      There is HDMI monitors without speakers.

      Through what output do such monitors pass the received audio signal?

      Are DVI and DisplayPort patented with royalties?

      DisplayPort has a 1 USD royalty per 5 devices. My search couldn't pull up info one way or the other for DVI.

    4. Re:Audio out, HDMI patents, and HDCP DRM by tepples · · Score: 1

      Or Displayport + VGA

      That's still a 20 cent royalty payable to a pool including Sony and four other companies, plus the cost of the DP physical connector and the circuitry needed for the DP sink.

    5. Re:Audio out, HDMI patents, and HDCP DRM by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Through what output do such monitors pass the received audio signal?

      They don't.

    6. Re:Audio out, HDMI patents, and HDCP DRM by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I'm not disputing that there is *some* cost. But its noise. The manufacturers could drop the vga-only sku, one less device to maintain warehouse, track, have procedures for and nobody would even notice. Its not like anyone would complain the price of monitors has gone up.

  32. Atom is as strong as P4 by tepples · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't expect many of those "other apps" to run terribly well on a $100 x86 PC.

    As I understand it, an Atom CPU roughly matches the performance of a Pentium 4 CPU clock for clock. This means an old application that runs well on a P4 will also run well on an Atom.

    1. Re:Atom is as strong as P4 by Assoluto · · Score: 2

      That's not a great endorsement. The NetBurst architecture in the P4 is legendary for it's terrible performance per clock. While AMD focused in increasing performance per clock with the Athlon, Intel intended to increase performance through higher clock speeds. They thought NetBurst would scale up to 10GHz, but things didn't work out that way and AMD ended up beating Intel on every metric - overall performance, performance per clock, performance per watt, performance per dollar. The P4 was so bad that Intel went back to the P3 and designed the Core from there. Saying it offers the same performance as the worst Intel processor ever doesn't fill me with enthusiasm.

    2. Re:Atom is as strong as P4 by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      As I understand it, an Atom CPU roughly matches the performance of a Pentium 4 CPU clock for clock. This means an old application that runs well on a P4 will also run well on an Atom.

      Sad to say, I bought Atom based notebooks a total of three times, having failed to learn my lesson the first time. Disappointed every time despite claims the the effect that it's better this time, honest! The truth: low performing, desk melting, battery chewing junk that I regret owning. Thanks for the effort Intel, but there will be no fourth Atom attempt from me.

      On the other hand, every ARM-based device I have (about 8 now) is a pleasure to use.

      (...but I have a Pentium 4 based shoebox that is still going strong, go figure)

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re:Atom is as strong as P4 by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      While AMD focused in increasing performance per clock with the Athlon, Intel intended to increase performance through higher clock speeds.

      Higher clock and longer pipeline. The latter was the real killer. Fine for straight up linear code, but not so much if the pipeline stalls multiple times per microsecond.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:Atom is as strong as P4 by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, an Atom CPU roughly matches the performance of a Pentium 4 CPU clock for clock. This means an old application that runs well on a P4 will also run well on an Atom.

      That is demonstrably wrong. Using the benchmark, Passmark, a 3GHz Pentium 4 has a CPU Mark of 358 while the previous -generation 1.6GHz Atom Z3795 scored 1684. The comparison site didn't have the Passmark of this newer Atom CPU, but the CPUs are similar enough.

    5. Re:Atom is as strong as P4 by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      The truth: low performing, desk melting, battery chewing junk that I regret owning.

      How long ago did you last buy an Atom-based system? While the CPUs have always been low-powered, the early units were encumbered with terrible supporting chipsets that offset the power savings. But the modern processors are not like that. My Atom notebook/tablet combo gets about 10 hours of battery life and runs very cool.

      The processor used by the Kangaroo is a four-core, 2 Watt, 14 nm model. Since the term "low performing" is relative and subjective I can't address that claim, but these units will not melt the desk and will not chew your batteries. The Kangaroo gets a disappointing 4 hours of battery life, but that is probably due to using a small & cheap battery rather than the processor greedily gobbling up the power.

    6. Re:Atom is as strong as P4 by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Look at the single thread score. Atom Z2795 = 480, 3GHz P4=652. 4 cores, faster memory, and probably better cache are what helps the Atom. It's still better then the P4 if running at the same clock but only by about a third.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    7. Re:Atom is as strong as P4 by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      Adding cores is one of the main ways that modern CPUs achieve their high performance. Modern software and operating systems are written to take advantage of this by heavily making use of multiple threads. Sure you could switch off 3 of the cores to artificially get similar performance to a P4, but then you only have yourself to blame for poor performance.

      So no, you don't get similar to a P4 with the new Atoms; you get the equivalent of four Pentium 4 CPUs in one chip. The single-threaded benchmark is of some importance, but fixating on it at the expense of the overall performance score ignores the fact that this is no longer the days of MS-DOS; we live with a system of numerous background processes and multi-threaded tasks.

    8. Re:Atom is as strong as P4 by tepples · · Score: 1

      Modern software and operating systems are written to take advantage of this by heavily making use of multiple threads.

      Which is fine if an application uses threads for something other than asynchronous I/O. A lot of applications do all their calculation on one thread, such as Firefox. Game console emulators tend to run single-threaded as well, except perhaps for video scaling and audio resampling, because dedicating one thread to CPU emulation and one thread to GPU emulation would waste too much time waiting for semaphores whenever the CPU and GPU communicate.

  33. WTF is wrong with these tiny system builders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't seem to understand the functional minimum in terms of RAM for any Windows OS above XP (x64 Vista, 7, 8) is 4GB's of RAM! These tiny PC's are interesting, but ultimately useless unless you plan on running Windows XP, or Linux. As soon as you boot the OS, you're out of RAM with 2GB's

    Such a shame. Such a waste.

    1. Re: WTF is wrong with these tiny system builders? by kenh · · Score: 1

      As soon as you boot the OS, you're out of RAM with 2GB's

      No, you're not - Vista flailed about with only 2 gigs, Win 7 was usable w/ 2 gigs, Win 8/8.1 was decent, and I expect Win 10 to be at least as good as Win 8/8.1 was with 2 gigs.

      --
      Ken
  34. Economies of scale, returns, and trialware subsidy by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    The GNU/Linux version is often more expensive, and I'm told this is for three reasons: lack of economies of scale, cost of handling returns from novices who end up buying the wrong thing, and the claim that the royalties paid by publishers of included trialware more than subsidize the royalty paid to Microsoft for Windows.

  35. Good for Kodi/XBMC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like this would make for a nice Kodi/XBMC box. Too bad it doesn't have a hardwired Ethernet connector.

  36. Re:Windows 10? Really? by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    I got an HP Stream 7 for the same price (same specs) and it has a screen. It's nice to carry a portable 7" Windows 10 full desktop OS around with you sometimes.

    Can you connect your HP Stream 7 to an external monitor or projector? Different use cases I guess then.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  37. Espresso PC all over again? by Eg0r · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the Espresso PC. A very niche design at the time, but let's see if 2015 will be the year of the slabputer (or whatever you want to call this thing).

    --
    "Hasta la victoria siempre!" El Comandante
  38. I Really Like It, Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really like the form factor and it may be priced decently, but I'd like to get some answers first.

    Does it run Linux? (Seems like it would.)
    How does the performance of this processor compare to the Raspberry Pi 2?
    How long does the SSD last?
    How long does the battery last?

    I can do a Raspberry Pi 2 with a 32GB flash drive and a small USB battery pack (3hours full load) for for around $90, but the form factor sucks in comparison. So, if performance is comparable, I'd love a few of these. I'd love them more with longer battery and lower price.

    Pi 2 - $35
    Case - $8
    Power supply- $5
    SD Card - $12
    32GB Flash - $15
    2200mAh Battery - $12

    1. Re: I Really Like It, Maybe by kenh · · Score: 1

      SD Card AND Flash? And I think you left out WiFi adapter...

      --
      Ken
    2. Re: I Really Like It, Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SD Card AND Flash? And I think you left out WiFi adapter...

      SD Card Root and Boot
      Flash for Data.
      I didn't forget WiFi, I just have no need for it. Ethernet > WiFi.

      Even if you wanted to swap the flash drive for a WiFi dongle the cost remains basically the same. The question though, is which device has more processing power? Kangaroo wins in terms of form factor, but if it isn't as powerful, then I'm not interested.

  39. Re:Economies of scale, returns, and trialware subs by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1

    Also don't forget that (legally speaking) Microsoft is buying ad space from manufacturers to put that little Windows 10 sticker on the case, which also helps to bring down the total cost of manufacturing.

    --
    Rawr
  40. Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I went to the kangaroo.cc website for the product to try and see who they were marketing this to in the first place. After having been there and read the whole site I can't see why anyone with a smartphone would buy one of these. If you have a laptop or desktop at home and a cloud storage account, or a home server, you can already do everything this thing is supposed to do with a smartphone that's already in your pocket. Makes no sense. This product would have been great in, say, 2003, but in today's world it's nothing more than an extremely poor person's alternative to the functionality already inherent in any smartphone. It literally has little to no market and no market advantage to drive it into one. I predict it will die in the next few months.

  41. Re:Windows 10? Really? by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1

    I don't have an HP Stream 7, but I do have a WinBook TW801 which is almost identical in specs but slightly larger and it has microHDMI out.

    --
    Rawr
  42. Re: Windows 10? Really? by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1

    The problem is, though, that operating it in such a way would violate FAA regs that require the device to be powered off during take-off and landing, so in order to keep it legal you'd have to fiddle around in your baggage anyway. But that's all pretty trivial when you consider that you have to dig around in your bag to get out the iPad in the first place, so you may as well take this thing out too, which mitigates the whole point of not having to worry about it being in your carry-on.

    --
    Rawr
  43. William Gibson had a name for this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called a 'deck.'

  44. Apps developed knowing that P4 IPC was terrible by tepples · · Score: 1

    The NetBurst architecture in the P4 is legendary for it's terrible performance per clock.

    Authors of applications intended for said architecture were probably aware of its terrible IPC. This means the applications will run fine on Atom, which has IPC that's similarly terrible but for a different reason.

    1. Re:Apps developed knowing that P4 IPC was terrible by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The NetBurst architecture in the P4 is legendary for it's terrible performance per clock.

      Authors of applications intended for said architecture were probably aware of its terrible IPC. This means the applications will run fine on Atom, which has IPC that's similarly terrible but for a different reason.

      I wouldn't count on it. Atom also has a lame ass pipeline.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Apps developed knowing that P4 IPC was terrible by tepples · · Score: 1

      Atom, which has IPC that's similarly terrible

      Atom also has a lame ass pipeline.

      That's what I said. Let me rephrase: If performance of a particular application was acceptable on the "lame ass pipeline" of P4 NetBurst, it will also be acceptable on the "lame ass pipeline" of a similarly clocked Atom. Or is Atom noticeably even lamer than P4?

      Besides, is there a viable alternative? Some free applications for Windows can be recompiled to run with Winelib on ARM. But is ARM noticeably better than Atom?

  45. Hardly amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an £80 8" tablet running Windows last Christmas. It has quad core cpu, 2GB RAM, 32GB SSD, HDMI out, plus a screen, battery, wifi etc. It's hardly impressive to see devices without the screen or battery coming out for similar prices.

  46. Re:Windows 10? Really? by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1
    It's not even a good thing for presentations. I can understand being in a situation where simplicity is best, and a single-cable solution would be ideal (multiple people presenting) but this would be a poor solution for that, because you'd still need a screen, mouse, and keyboard just to boot it up before your presentation (unless you want everyone waiting around while you're doing it while hooked up to the projector), and then you'd still need a mouse and keyboard at wherever you're presenting to operate the thing. An iPad with an HDMI adapter is a much better solution, or if that's too expensive, one of those $100 Windows tablets with a microHDMI port. At least then you could use PowerPoint or Keynote's presenter's tools too.

    This is just a solution looking for a problem.

    --
    Rawr
  47. I do this with my Mac Mini by Yergle143 · · Score: 1

    I hate laptops...I work in specific places. I tote my Mac Mini to and fro and plug it into the prepositioned mouse/keyboard/screen combo. It runs Linux and Windows.

    1. Re:I do this with my Mac Mini by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but a MacMini is big, heavy, and fairly expensive. The next step up from something like the Kangaroo is an Intel NUC.

  48. Re:Windows 10? Really? by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1

    In the hotel, you connect it to the TV in the room, which usually has HDMI now.

    And are typically blocked off either physically or in software. But if you're in a hotel you could just plug it into the wall anyway. Plus most laptops and tablets have HDMI out, and if you're carrying around clothes for a trip adding a laptop or tablet into the mix doesn't add too much weight or bulk to your luggage.

    In the meeting room, you connect it to their projector, or to your own portable battery-operated unit.

    But you'd have to have the entire room up and running before people come in, unless you want to waste their time watching you boot the thing and load everything up. And if you do have access to the meeting room before hand you'd have the extra time to plug in the device, negating the need for a battery. A laptop or tablet would still be superior here since all you have to do is load up your stuff, put the thing in sleep, walk into the meeting room, wake it up, plug it in and hit "Present" and you're off to the races.

    --
    Rawr
  49. No keyboard? by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

    That's one way to get around Windows 10 keylogging!

    In your face Microsoft!

  50. Ideal wearable! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    This thing would be perfect if you want to gargoyle it up, you'd just need a handheld control device and a head-mounted display.

    This is getting closer to my ideal smartwatch concept: Where the smartwatch is your primary, maybe only computer, with a basic interface because you're not really meant to use the watch as an interface. You'd use something like a phone, tablet, or laptop sort of like a remote desktop terminal to interact with the computer on your wrist. Something like this might be practical in about 20 years.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  51. Goodby chromeos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 10 is INFINITLY better than ChromeOS. More apps, more users, more privacy and security since it isnt from google, more cool factor stuff like integration with xbox and one drive, proper office document editing, etc etc.

  52. Needs better hardware for that 2gb ram / 32g HDD by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Needs better hardware for that 2gb ram / 32g HDD way to small for office use.

    Also only 2 usb ports and no Ethernet?

  53. If they want me to use Win 10... by hyades1 · · Score: 0

    ...they'll have to pay me a hell of a lot more than $99. ;-)

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  54. ARM Winelib by tepples · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, every ARM-based device I have (about 8 now) is a pleasure to use.

    Say I have a few Windows applications that are free software, something like Modplug Tracker or FamiTracker. Has anyone had success at recompiling Windows applications with Winelib so that they'll run on ARM Linux boxes?

  55. Re:Economies of scale, returns, and trialware subs by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    The GNU/Linux version is often more expensive, and I'm told this is for three reasons: lack of economies of scale, cost of handling returns from novices who end up buying the wrong thing, and the claim that the royalties paid by publishers of included trialware more than subsidize the royalty paid to Microsoft for Windows.

    Maybe true, maybe not. I find these guys deal fairly and don't sell you junk:

          http://thelinuxlaptop.com/

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  56. Re: Needs better hardware for that 2gb ram / 32g H by kenh · · Score: 1

    It has wifi & Bluetooth, a USB 3 to Ethernet adapter isn't so expensive...

    --
    Ken
  57. Ipad app - how far back? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

    I've got an old original Ipad - this might make it a bit more useful, anyone know if the Windows 10 'App' that connects with this run on the original Ipad?

  58. No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the drawbacks of a desktop, and almost none of the benefits of a mobile.

  59. This is just a screenless phone by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

    The newest Windows Phones do this, it's called continuum. It seems like this company is just selling a screenless phone.

  60. re: buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ermahgerd!

    what's with the stock photos used on their microsite for this stupid new toy product?

    for a second, I thought it was television: hardly any white people, but niggers and spics everywhere.

  61. Already got burned with the Intel Compute Stick by IronChef · · Score: 1

    I really want to like these products but my first foray into the field was a disaster. The Intel Compute Stick was my first cheap-o headless "full Windows" PC and it was total garbage.

    It was so slow that installing Windows Updates took for-ev-er. And worst of all, in its shipping configuration, it just failed to install most updates. You'd watch it grind away for 30 minutes, throw an error, reboot, and then uninstall the partially complete update.

    If a computer can't even successfully keep up with Microsoft's recommended patches without crapping itself, it isn't very useful.

    I got some moderate use out of the Compute Stick by disabling WU entirely, but then its built in wifi started to fail, and then the provided 2 A USB power supply died, and then I gave up on it.

  62. Did anybody else think about who InFocus is? by kamakazi · · Score: 2

    This isn't a computer company, this is a projector company. Did no one else immediately think "Oh, they are going to build the dock into projectors, you have a conference room system in one piece that just needs a wireless keyboard/mouse/presentation remote."

    The battery means the projector can be as small as a pico projector, with its own built in battery and you have a complete presentation system that fits easily in the briefcase with your sales literature and you are completely wireless.

    Add a smartphone with hotspotting, you have complete connectivity (unless you live in the boonies where I live) with no other pieces required for your sales presentation, whether it is in a hotel room or the corner of a MacDonalds.

    So yeah, all us geeks want to know how it would work in a beowulf cluster, but I think the real target is going to be non-geeks who really can benefit from not having to worry about whether the potential client has a projector with VGA or HDMI in the conference room.

    In the longer view of things, if InFocus standardizes on this dock connector you can upgrade the computer or the projector one at a time. At this price you could even have computers dedicated to a specific presentation, swap the computer, the IT guys back at $bigCo set it up to auto run, you just plug in the computer with your presentation on it. Even easier than swapping out those itty bitty micro SD cards.

    --
    "Proximity to wonder has blunted our perception and appreciation of it" --Tim Hartnell in 'Exploring ARTIFICIAL INTELLI
    1. Re:Did anybody else think about who InFocus is? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      I've been hoping for the day that the "computer" is just a module within the laptop much like this device. Then when you get Joe-Somebody who gets a promotion and wants a laptop, you just pop this inside the laptop dock and now he's mobile. Or even just make it so the laptop is slightly more modular.

  63. Re: Windows 10? Really? by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Go re-read those rules and regs, they've changed in this last year, sonny-boy.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  64. Not necessarily new... by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

    This device looks vastly superior but this sort of Windows/Intel form factor has been around for a while. I bought a WinTel device last april for around $100 - about the same shape as an Apple TV. The device from this story is vastly superior as it has a legit x64 CPU that supports 64-bit OS (the WinTel seems locked to 32-bit OS via the UEFI). It looks like the next iteration up of the Atom SoC. Also, the WinTel has an invalid Windows 8 key burned into the firmware. And I can't seem to install 32-bit Windows 7 on it (yes, I've tried every method on the web). Really wish I had waited for this device instead of getting the stupid WinTel.

    --
    "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
  65. Kangaroo Dock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newegg product page has been updated to indicate "Kangaroo Dock Included"

  66. Install applications to the flash drive by tepples · · Score: 1

    Has anyone here ever actually tried to use a laptop on a bus?

    I regularly do. The fact that my laptop's screen is only 10.1" makes it practical space-wise.

    Oh, goody, I can carry around my files but not any of the expensive proprietary software installed on the work PC necessary to actually work on those files.

    Then install "the expensive proprietary software" to the flash drive rather than to the computer. Or do not use proprietary software in the first place.

  67. Fuck WAY OFF Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you install Windows 10, you have been warned: It is complete spyware AND malware AND even adware. Globally.

    I think the majority of the Internet public know this already. If you can format it and put Linux on it... it's still not the best option. sub-$100 Android HTPC's have been #1 on Amazon for a long long time.

    See a Kangaroo? fucking bounce.

    Get rekt Microsoft. Fuck any and every back stab company, especially global back stabs.

  68. Let's try this again... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Only $99? If anybody expects me to use Windows 10 on a computer, they'll have to pay me a lot more than that.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  69. Re:People keep doing this sort of thing by peacefool · · Score: 1

    Tango PC too... Which never happened (I guess?).

  70. I Received my Kangaroo PC...and it was DOA by jbarr · · Score: 1

    I plugged it in and it would not power on. I left it plugged in to charge overnight, but it doesn't power on. So I got an RMA from NewEgg from without issue, and back it goes. I'm looking forward to the replacement, but how frustrating?!?

    That said, what I can say is that the construction is very solid, and it is quite compact--about the size of a large smartphone. It's an intriguing device that could have many uses. This could serve as a simple Home Theater PC running Kodi, Plex, Netflix, etc. I might even consider getting one for my parents who are moving into an independent living facility to give them an extremely compact yet usable computer that would more than suit their needs.

    Given that I couldn't power it on, I can say that physically, the only real con I found is the AC adapter: The connector seats very, VERY loosely into the dock. (Maybe that's the issue with mine?) There's no perceptible click, snap, or even tight feeling to tell that it's seated correctly. One bump, and it could easily jar loose. (I checked for obstructions and found none.)

    I am looking forward to getting the replacement.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:I Received my Kangaroo PC...and it was DOA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to push it in pretty hard, harder than you might expect. Then it's fine.