Slashdot Mirror


Junkyard Owner Saves Lunar Rover Prototype (vice.com)

An anonymous reader writes: On Tuesday, Slashdot users learned that a man in Alabama sold a lunar rover prototype for scrap metal. We now learn that the junkyard owner has saved this important piece of scientific history. The man claims that, upon receiving the prototype at his scrap facility, he set it aside because he knew exactly what it was.

31 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Re: On Monday by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it's OK - they had to wait until Tuesday to collectively mock all the people who live in Alabama. Now that they've realized that a junkyard owner there knows more about space history than they do, they can take the whole day Friday to reflect on how much the experience has caused them to grow as individuals.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  2. After which it was taken to Las Vegas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where Rick offered 500 bucks for it, Big Hoss asked whether the moon landing was faked, the old man mentioned the Navy and Chum sat on it.

    1. Re:After which it was taken to Las Vegas by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Where Rick offered 500 bucks for it, Big Hoss asked whether the moon landing was faked, the old man mentioned the Navy and Chum sat on it.

      At least Big Hoss didn't try to buy it with his own money then take it to Danny to get it tricked out. Because you know Chum would want to put hydraulics on that thing.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  3. Re:Sure. by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    Not at all, those of us who were alive at the time who watched the rover on televison would recognize the frame instantly, just as we would recognize the ascent and descent stages of prototype Lunar Module either together or seperately. You must be young.

  4. Re:Sure. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    You would instantly recognize this? You really must be a space nerd... I feel definitely above the overall average when it comes to knowledge space tech in general, and I definitely wouldn't recognize most of the multitude of planetary rover prototypes from the 60s.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  5. Why did NASA lie about it being destroyed? by ArylAkamov · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to the article NASA knew exactly where it was, that it was not destroyed and had even come to inspect it.

    "NASA knew it was still available. In my mind, they tried to play a trickery game. They wanted me to loan it to them, but I think they just wanted to get it into their possession. They offered me [perks], they offered me everything but cash," the junkyard owner said. "NASA told me when they came out to inspect it that they had looked for it for 25 years. It is the von Braun, the first and last they made. I was told it is the rarest of all the units."

    So what's the deal?

    1. Re:Why did NASA lie about it being destroyed? by erice · · Score: 5, Interesting

      According to the article NASA knew exactly where it was, that it was not destroyed and had even come to inspect it.

      "NASA knew it was still available. In my mind, they tried to play a trickery game. They wanted me to loan it to them, but I think they just wanted to get it into their possession. They offered me [perks], they offered me everything but cash," the junkyard owner said. "NASA told me when they came out to inspect it that they had looked for it for 25 years. It is the von Braun, the first and last they made. I was told it is the rarest of all the units."

      So what's the deal?

      I imagine it went something like this:

      NASA Rep: That's GREAT! You've done your country a great service by preserving this priceless artifact. When shall we pick it up?
      Junk Yard Owner: Now hold on a minute! This ain't free. I want to be paid.
      NASA Rep: OK. How much do you want?
      Junk Yard Owner: $BIGNUM
      NASA Rep: This is a side project. We don't have that kind of budget.
      Junk Yard Owner: This is a limited time offer! If you don't pay $BIGNUM by X, I will melt it down! Then what will your superiors say?
      NASA Rep: My superiors barely approve of me spending time on this. I think it is important but there is no way I can get the money you ask.
      Junk Yard Owner: I'm serious! I'll melt it down!
      NASA Rep: Well, then I guess we're done here.

      [Time X + Delta]
      NASA PR: A priceless artifact of the Apollo program has been melted down.

      [Time X + Delta + Y]
      Junk Yard Owner: I did not melt it down. NASA just has to pay me.

    2. Re:Why did NASA lie about it being destroyed? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      "If the prototype was taken from NASA without permission, technically it's stolen government property. They can just take it back without paying the guy anything."

      More precisely, the government can claim that a given artifact was stolen and just grab it even if it has no proof. If you have a sufficiently large amount of money and a period of years to devote to the effort, you can make them give it back eventually.

      To see what I mean, look up 'Langbord Coins".

    3. Re:Why did NASA lie about it being destroyed? by marciot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They offered me [perks], they offered me everything but cash

      The deal is that thanks to Congress NASA has no budget. They are scrambling to put together a bake sale to raise money for buying the rover, but it's hard to get aerospace engineers to bake anything that someone else would want to buy and eat.

    4. Re:Why did NASA lie about it being destroyed? by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Funny

      True. When you bake everything at 1400K, your ceramics come out nicely but cakes tend to get a little burnt.

    5. Re:Why did NASA lie about it being destroyed? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      The deal is that when it comes to Government it's a Budget concern. They need to follow The Budget at any price, no matter what, and if they need to buy it back with money then they need to have An Account.

      A lot of other action can be absorbed into the daily work, but as soon as you purchase something it must be on The Budget and there nut be An Account for said purchase.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  6. Re:Sure. by Golden_Rider · · Score: 2

    Not at all, those of us who were alive at the time who watched the rover on televison would recognize the frame instantly, just as we would recognize the ascent and descent stages of prototype Lunar Module either together or seperately. You must be young.

    Except that it does not look anything like the actual lunar rovers which were sent to the moon, because this was only a prototype for testing various components...

  7. Re: On Monday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    whooooosshh. You must be from Mississippi.

  8. Re: On Monday by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

    That being exactly his point.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  9. Re: On Monday by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Junk dealers is ALWAYS going to know how much it's really worth (and if he's not sure he'll put it aside until he does know) and I highly doubt he's going to voluntarily hand it over without receiving a check for how much it's worth.

    One of the prime profit opportunities in the junk business is to receive items that aren't junk. Dealers are always on the lookout for special non-junk items they can make a bundle on because some ignorant dumbass sold it to them for a few cents a pound. It's not that much different than the pawn business where they are always on the lookout for antiques and other items they know are worth far more than the owner believes.

    When I heard this story I was at first incredulus that the guy didn't walk across the street and tell the neighbor what it was. Then I realized that the chances the Junk dealer wouldn't put it aside and determine the worth before melting it down was near zero. Then I realized the guy that didn't walk across the street basically screwed over the neighbor by not telling him how much it was worth with the side realization that he may have cut a side deal with the junk dealer by tipping him off.

  10. Absurd by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More like:

    Junk Yard: You can have it for $FAIRLY_LARGE_SUM, or I'll sell it to the highest bidder. But out of deference, I'm willing to give you first access without bidding.

    NASA: Give it to us for free, or we will use legal acton (which is why junkyard owner brought in lawyers and kept silent).

    NASA probably lied to try and cast doubt on the authenticity of what he had to reduce the selling price so they could get it cheaper. Far more believable than your absurd fantasy of the junk yard owner threatening to melt down a priceless artifact.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Absurd by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

      The truth is probably more to do with the Senate Oversight Committee debating the existence of the Junkyard

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  11. Re:Sure. by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Except back then in Alabama everybody knew about it. We kept track of everything space related, even prototypes. Von Braun lived in Alabama!!!! Huntsville was the very heart of the space program. Still is! We're pretty well-informed down here.

    I was born in 1953, grew up about 16 miles from the junkyard (60 miles from Huntsville), and I would have recognized the damned thing. I'd recognize nearly anything related to the space program from that era. Most everybody I know would.

  12. Look Again by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    The wheels in the two photos are identical, apparently you can't count very well. Either than or you are unable to recognize the difference between light cast onto cross-beams on the back of the wheels from the holes themselves...

    The cross-beams on the wheels you can't see well (only back-right wheel) in the current-day picture, but it's still pretty obvious in the original photo what is going on light-wise.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  13. Re: On Monday by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Weren't you recently complaining in another thread about people posting sexist/racist comments?

    If you're going to go around making bigoted and stereotypical remarks yourself, perhaps you shouldn't whine when other people do it.

  14. Re: On Monday by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Weren't you recently complaining in another thread about people posting sexist/racist comments?

    Did I post a sexist/racist comment? Last time I looked, there were people of all races and sexes in Alabama. And most of them are related by blood.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  15. Re: On Monday by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've always wondered. If a couple in Alabama get a divorce, are they still brother and sister?

  16. Re: On Monday by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It really destroys Progressive thought when it claims to be tolerant and openminded and then non-ironically makes dated, stereotype-based hate posts.

    And if you're going to criticize Alabama, it has one of the highest rates of black people in the nation, so you're a racist as well.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  17. Re: On Monday by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is only true when the people working the counter or the scales or other forms of receiving have a financial stake in the company. When they do, they're willing to bend company procedures. Sometimes it's because they know something is actually worth more than its scrap value or because it has real sentimental value and should be preserved rather than junked, and sometimes it's because the owner or partner actually has a heart and is willing to take less than the completely-parted-out value for something in order to sell it whole to someone that wants the whole thing.

    My experience is mostly with automotive wrecking yards. The big recyclers aren't much fun to deal with, the staff doesn't care and just goes through the motions. The small private wrecking yards usually have the owner right there in the office, and sometimes one can buy whole cars with title for much less than he'd get if he's willing to sit on it for a couple of years to part it out, as he likes cars too and actually does restore them and values others that do the same.

    Unfortunately there are less and less owner-operator types anymore.

    As for this particular man, I don't have a problem with him making some real money selling the rover back to NASA or some other government agency. He's arguably the first person to care about it for quite some time, and it's not his problem that NASA and the other intermediate owners didn't value it at the time as much as he does now. If I were in his shoes I'd be tempted to restore it myself, just to be able to claim that I did, if no one was willing to come to a price I was willing to agree to.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  18. Re: On Monday by KGIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you implying that the internet has people who reflect, grow, and learn from their own mistakes? Besides, Friday is the day we rant about social justice folks. I don't think we'll have time for introspection and personal growth. We've got howler monkey screeching and poop flinging to do, ain't nobody got time for self-improvement on Fridays.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  19. Re:Sure. by KGIII · · Score: 2

    I'd have been ten when the picture was taken (probably, technically, nine) and I recognize it. I'd also recognize LBJ. I don't know how tall he was but he always looked like a big man in the film footage. Anyhow, it's got a big fucking NASA logo on it and it's in Alabama. Of course you don't smelt it down instantly. Junk yard owners are not dumb, I'm not sure where that stereotype comes from. I think I might recognize it but I have the benefit of now knowing about it so I can't really say.

    Actually, I just clicked the link and looked at the picture. I figured I should, before hitting submit. (Don't worry, I didn't read the article.) No, no I'd have not recognized that. Not at all. I'd have been curious and found out what it was, however. That it has specialized tires means that I'd be awfully curious. I'd have also been curious because of the wheels, they're definitely not typical. I doubt I'd have smelted it down until after I knew what it was.

    After looking at it, I'm not sure they should be called heroic or if it's really all that valuable as a historic relic. I guess that is for others to decide. I'm not sure that I'm qualified to opine.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  20. This is a SF story, sort of by Terje+Mathisen · · Score: 2

    Last night I bought a Baen EBook: Terry Bisson - Numbers Don't Lie.

    The book consists of three stories, one of them is about a "Hole in the Hole", a Brooklyn junkyard which uses a spacetime rift connecting the junkyard to the Moon in order to get rid of old tires. Our protagonists tries to use said rift to retrieve one of the three Apollo Moon buggies that were left behind.

    Terje

    --
    "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
  21. Re:Sure. by aXis100 · · Score: 2

    It looked like a crappy old go-cart to me. I would have crushed it in an instant.

  22. Re: On Monday by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Informative

    Considering that junkyards today are pretty detailed about separation of items depending on metal type and sometimes even alloys they need to identify what they are working with to put stuff in the right bucket. Unusual devices requires extra consideration not only from the perspective of metals but also from hazardous material.

    Junkyards are no longer a local hobo operation but actually pretty detailed in what they do - and regulated. So if stuff ends up from someone that do have some unusual labeling like NASA or so then they will at least take a second look. They usually want to make sure that they avoid the Cobalt-60 incident from December 1983 in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico and similar.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  23. Re:Typical Liberal boondoggle by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dude, you're not suppose to drink the bong water....

  24. Re: On Monday by Holi · · Score: 2

    Yes because when one person makes an off color joke, it means that everyone with a similar political view is tainted. Hard to call out people on stereotyping by doing it yourself.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.