Slashdot Mirror


Anonymous Begins Publishing Ku Klux Klan Member Details Online

An anonymous reader writes: Anonymous has begun releasing the personal details of members of the Ku Klux Klan, escalating its cyberwar against the white supremacist group. Last week the hacktivist group promised to reveal the identity of 1,000 members of the KKK after getting possession of the private information through a compromised Twitter account. A press release from Anonymous reads in part: "After closely observing so many of you for so very long, we feel confident that applying transparency to your organizational cells is the right, just, appropriate and only course of action. You are abhorrent. Criminal. You are more than extremists. You are more than a hate group. You operate much more like terrorists and you should be recognized as such. You are terrorists that hide your identities beneath sheets and infiltrate society on every level. The privacy of the Ku Klux Klan no longer exists in cyberspace. You’ve had blood on your hands for nearly 200 years. You continue to inflict civil rights violations, commit violent crimes and solicit others to commit violent criminal acts. You seek to intimidate and/or eliminate those that are different from you and those that you dislike by any means possible. You seek to terrorize anyone and anything that you feel is a threat to your narrow view of the 'American way of life'."

24 of 546 comments (clear)

  1. Rednecks Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The names of a thousand hateful red necks. Sounds like the best reading list for the winter. The real fun will be to see who gets wrongly targeted. I hope no one has the same name as me or signed me up. Vigilantes for the win!

    1. Re:Rednecks Anonymous by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure there's no possibility that there will be any names released who aren't actually KKK members.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re: Rednecks Anonymous by hesiod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anonymous isn't a set group of people who will learn from mistakes, because it's most likely not the same people. Also, since the list was disseminated to others, any individual can add names, claim it's the unedited original, and spread it under the umbrella of "Anonymous."

  2. What's with the .ru accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looking at the Pastebin data, seems almost all the E-mail addresses in the pre-release come from a Russian site. It would be interesting to have some confirmation before people listed in the data get the dogs of war sicced on them.

  3. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One anonymous criminal organization exposing another. For transparency no less!

  4. Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are no journalistic controls in place. They can put whoever they want on that list.

    1. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by Coren22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because they wore Guy Fawkes masks and everything! They must be the very same Anonymous...

      I'm wondering when the Black Panthers leak is coming, as they are just as much a hate group.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by WhiplashII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are aware that almost all KKK members were democrats, right? And that the "party of Lincoln", also known as Republicans, fought a civil war to end slavery?

      Please go ahead and continue to shout the lie...

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    3. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by IceAgeComing · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're misquoting and hiding behind historical details.

      The Southern establishment switched from Democrat to Republican in the 1960's in response to the Democratic President Lyndon Johnson (Texas) supporting Civil Rights. The parent post was not about party affiliation 50 years ago. It was about today's party affiliations.

  5. Publishing? You mean DOXXING right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh wait... we hates the KKK so it's just "publishing" informaiton.

    Information we don't even have decent proof as to the nature of the source.

    Like Dan Rather's proof that Bush got preferential treatment - Until the documents were proved as forgeries - That's ok, he said, the documents are fake but what they said is true!

    So which is it? Do Slashdot's editors now agree that doxxing is good?

  6. a real false flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The data in this one makes no sense.

    This isn't Anon, this is someone else trying to discredit Anonymous before the real data comes out.

  7. The Reason for the Russian by Shoten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, a lot of people have been asking about this...asking why so many of the addresses end in ".ru"

    Fundamentally...think about it. Russia is a haven for a lot of different things, including bulletproof hosting that is beyond the reach of the FBI and other Western LEOs, either via direct raids, wiretaps or by more procedural means (subpoenas, etc.). So it entirely makes sense that people who are, in the truest sense of the word, interested in the overthrow of the US Government as it exists today should use email accounts that are hosted in Russia, far from the reach of the organizations that are out to get them.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  8. Not dangerous? by Elfich47 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cases of arson, lynching, beatings, killings, cross burnings and voter suppression in an organized manner against a specific segment of the population? These activities have been ongoing for over a hundred years in a systematic manner? The frequency is down but it still occurs or is overlooked. I would call that terrorism at the very least.

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
  9. Re:I look forward to the ISIS publication.... by thaylin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What is a terrorist?

    a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims.

    the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

    So are you saying that the KKK does not use violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims?

    --
    When you cant win, ad hominem.
  10. When was that again? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cases of arson, lynching, beatings, killings, cross burnings and voter suppression in an organized manner against a specific segment of the population?....The frequency is down but it still occurs or is overlooked.

    But when was the last time any of that happened? I have not seen stories about anything like that for many years - the most recent stuff being black churches set fire to, which it turned out was not don't by the KKK at all (who would seem to have been a primary suspect).

    I'm not saying the KKK has not been a horrible organization in the past, or even that they are in any way an organization that should be supported today. I'm saying that they have become essentially irrelevant, and the resources used to combat the "terrorists" of the KKK would be far better spent on real terrorists - but they aren't because the real terrorists can bite. Attacking the KKK like this is lame because it's pretending to help people while actually helping no-one.

    The KKK is dying, why even give them the publicity these attacks grant? It can only help the KKK at this point.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  11. Re:You're wasting your time, the Klan is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    More blacks are murdered by other blacks in one year, than have been killed by the KKK in its entire existence.

    See also "Worrying about the wrong problem"

  12. Re:I'm not defending the Klan or anything... by shaitand · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But unlike being a criminal, being a Klan member indicates you are a bad person.

  13. "Redneck" is a racial slur. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The names of a thousand hateful red necks.

    "Redneck" is a racial slur. It insinuates that the target is, not just from a rural culture (especially - a poor white southern farmer), and not just sunburned on the back of his neck due to working outdoors with a short haircut, but also that he may be part American Indian. (It originates in a time where this was considered to be extremely "poor breeding", and many so-called "sundown towns" had laws requiring people with any American Indian genetics to be out of town by undown.

    It currently has an implication that the pepole it is applied to are unintelligent and uneducated. (The space program proves the lie of this: Note the accents of the people involved. A substantial fraction of real rocket scientists are, and were, rednecks.) This slur dates at least to the Scopes Monkey Trial (which was largely a propaganda piece fomented by the mining interests to brand the miners, who were trying to unionize at the time, as igorant idiots in the urban east coast's public perception.)

    Rule of thumb: If you don't self-identify as a redneck, and wouldn't use the "N" word, don't use the "R" word.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you just make all of that up? I can't find a single source that connects "redneck" with Native Americans, every definition I've seen ties it specifically to white people. Many today claim it as a badge of pride. And the Scopes Monkey Trial? That had nothing to do with unionizing miners, and everything to do with a publicity stunt to draw attention to the town of Dayton, TN. Mr. Scopes was even unsure whether he had ever taught evolution but incriminated himself anyway so that the trial could have a defendant. The miners that you're referring to were trying to unionize 5 years before Scopes and they wore red bandanas around their necks and self-identified as "rednecks" to help themselves organize and have solidarity. That label was not given to them by outside interests, they chose it.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by russotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The space program proves the lie of this: Note the accents of the people involved.

      German?

    3. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WTF, really?

      Remember, it's not genocide if it's the enemy. The progressives have been very clear about trying to destroy the roots and symbols of rural culture in America. Religion and Guns? Clearly must be suppressed.

      I'm strongly opposed to gun control, but the arguments made by the other side are not without merit. A few gun owners have made their hobby/obsession a problem for the rest of us. Decent gun owners would be better served by reminding the rest of the population that they're not all a bunch of nutcases. Are you sure you're helping?

      Same for the "religion" half of your argument. Keep your guns out of my face and your religion as well, and we'll get along juuuuust fine.

      Deep family ties? Must financially punish marriage.

      Yeah, for definitions of "financially punish" that include "Stop subsidizing specific peoples' personal relationships at everyone else's expense." I'm all for that.

      Economy? The war on tobacco continues to destroy cash crops

      Of course, tens of thousands of cases of heart disease and cancer don't have any economic consequences at all, am I right?

      the war on coal decimating employment

      I'm not a global-warrming alarmist but you don't have to be one to recognize that digging up coal and burning it is a stupid, inefficient, wasteful, and generally harmful way to generate power. The sooner we get away from coal the better off we'll all be, and that includes the rural areas.

      and turning the education system into a proxy for the propaganda war has destroyed the education system there.

      Yeah, when we took Jeebus out of the classroom and started teaching evolution, I guess that's when things really started to go to hell, huh?

      This is exactly why sane people are starting to gang up against religion. Don't want a "propaganda war?" Don't start one.

  14. Re:The Klan Is Always Getting Bigger by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't know anything about the Tea Party except what you've been told by CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, etc. If you knew anything about them, you'd probably agree with them. Don't let your ignorance blind you.

    They are not a "hate" group and have plenty of black members. They even have a lot of members who are Democrats!

  15. Re: Publishing? You mean DOXXING right? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So are American's allowed to join ISIS and speak their mind about it?

    No.

    It seems only foreign terrorist organisations are banned. Domestic ones are allowed. And yes, the KKK is a terrorist group. How else can you describe their activities as "night riders". Lynching, burning and dragging black people.

  16. Re:The Klan Is Always Getting Bigger by Barsteward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    their loudest voice is Sarah Palin, what more do you need to know?

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)