Slashdot Mirror


Anonymous Begins Publishing Ku Klux Klan Member Details Online

An anonymous reader writes: Anonymous has begun releasing the personal details of members of the Ku Klux Klan, escalating its cyberwar against the white supremacist group. Last week the hacktivist group promised to reveal the identity of 1,000 members of the KKK after getting possession of the private information through a compromised Twitter account. A press release from Anonymous reads in part: "After closely observing so many of you for so very long, we feel confident that applying transparency to your organizational cells is the right, just, appropriate and only course of action. You are abhorrent. Criminal. You are more than extremists. You are more than a hate group. You operate much more like terrorists and you should be recognized as such. You are terrorists that hide your identities beneath sheets and infiltrate society on every level. The privacy of the Ku Klux Klan no longer exists in cyberspace. You’ve had blood on your hands for nearly 200 years. You continue to inflict civil rights violations, commit violent crimes and solicit others to commit violent criminal acts. You seek to intimidate and/or eliminate those that are different from you and those that you dislike by any means possible. You seek to terrorize anyone and anything that you feel is a threat to your narrow view of the 'American way of life'."

83 of 546 comments (clear)

  1. Rednecks Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The names of a thousand hateful red necks. Sounds like the best reading list for the winter. The real fun will be to see who gets wrongly targeted. I hope no one has the same name as me or signed me up. Vigilantes for the win!

    1. Re:Rednecks Anonymous by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Funny

      The real fun will be to see how many of these people are active politicians.

    2. Re:Rednecks Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      and active law enforcement officials too.

    3. Re:Rednecks Anonymous by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure there's no possibility that there will be any names released who aren't actually KKK members.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Rednecks Anonymous by nwf · · Score: 2

      The real fun will be to see how many of these people are active politicians.

      Or match with Ashley Maddison accounts who were looking for a non-white girl to hook up with. That would be seriously funny.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    5. Re: Rednecks Anonymous by hesiod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anonymous isn't a set group of people who will learn from mistakes, because it's most likely not the same people. Also, since the list was disseminated to others, any individual can add names, claim it's the unedited original, and spread it under the umbrella of "Anonymous."

    6. Re:Rednecks Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do we get to make fun of the ultraliberal Democrats on the list like the mayor of Knoxville or do we just get to hate the Republicans?

    7. Re:Rednecks Anonymous by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      Well they did try to prove each members' membership to the clan by gathering DNA evidence, but they found it was all the same.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:Rednecks Anonymous by sjames · · Score: 2
  2. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    The crux of the matter comes down to this: is it a burning issue?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Ob by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Kkknock it off!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  3. What's with the .ru accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looking at the Pastebin data, seems almost all the E-mail addresses in the pre-release come from a Russian site. It would be interesting to have some confirmation before people listed in the data get the dogs of war sicced on them.

    1. Re: What's with the .ru accounts? by KGIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      A buddy and I were going to go to one of their rallies. We were too drunk to drive and unable to actually figure out how to make the pointy hats with sheets - and his girlfriend, at the time, was not impressed with what we did to the linen. It is at this point that I should also share that I'm mixed, racially, and that one of those mixes is black and my friend, whom I was in the Corps with, was so black his nickname was "The Grape Ape" 'cause he was almost purple black - from the Dominican Republic by heritage. We were late to our Klan meeting.

      This is probably for the best. We were in Virginia at the time. We'd probably have been lynched or at least had a good brawl on our hands.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  4. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One anonymous criminal organization exposing another. For transparency no less!

    1. Re: Irony by halivar · · Score: 4, Funny

      the ironing is delicious

      I feel this comment left me a little flat.

    2. Re: Irony by N1AK · · Score: 4, Funny

      I felt pressed to respond and let off some steam.

    3. Re: Irony by halivar · · Score: 2

      As long as you don't get hot under the collar...

    4. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Time for our bi-yearly reminder:

      Anonymous is a generic group-heading that refers to multiple cells of groups.
      Many of these groups hate each other, but they all fall under the same heading of Anonymous since it is where their roots began.
      Occasionally they work with each other for a common goal, but it is rare.

      There is no singular Anonymous group and hasn't been since 2006.

    5. Re:Irony by Solandri · · Score: 3, Funny

      One anonymous criminal organization exposing another. For transparency no less!

      I like how you made it a trifecta by posting that as anonymous coward.

    6. Re: Irony by theCzechGuy · · Score: 2

      I am board with your puns.

    7. Re: Irony by Spaham · · Score: 2

      yeah, don't leave it on a back burner

  5. Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are no journalistic controls in place. They can put whoever they want on that list.

    1. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by thaylin · · Score: 2

      What specific journalistic controls are you speaking about?

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    2. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by sycodon · · Score: 2

      I have documents that show you are not only a member of the KKK, but also a pedophile.

      What controls do you think should have been applied to that statement?

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    3. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by Nexus7 · · Score: 2

      > We know Anonymous has political bias...

      So does the KKK.

    4. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by Coren22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because they wore Guy Fawkes masks and everything! They must be the very same Anonymous...

      I'm wondering when the Black Panthers leak is coming, as they are just as much a hate group.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    5. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by WhiplashII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are aware that almost all KKK members were democrats, right? And that the "party of Lincoln", also known as Republicans, fought a civil war to end slavery?

      Please go ahead and continue to shout the lie...

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    6. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by IceAgeComing · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're misquoting and hiding behind historical details.

      The Southern establishment switched from Democrat to Republican in the 1960's in response to the Democratic President Lyndon Johnson (Texas) supporting Civil Rights. The parent post was not about party affiliation 50 years ago. It was about today's party affiliations.

    7. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Informative

      Robert Bird was a democrat and KKK member. One of the more famous cases of liberal bias against their own hate. He got a pass for being KKK because he was a good liberal.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by jdeisenberg · · Score: 4, Informative

      a) It's Robert Byrd. b) If you look at his voting record from 1968 onwards, you'll see that he was hardly voting the Klan agenda: He voted in support of the Civil Rights Act of 1968. In 2003-2004 he had a 100% "pro" voting record from the NAACP, and in 2005 proposed additional funding for the Martin Luther King Jr Memorial.

    9. Re:Who is to say that this "list" is legit at all? by TimSSG · · Score: 2
      Ha Ha Ha; now that was very funny.
      Filled with lies but funny!
      Tim S.

      So I have no skin in this game and do not for a second trust anything Anonymous puts out unless it comes with a huge amount of independently verifiable sources...

      But I do just really need to say that the Republican party that Abraham Lincoln was a member of has nearly nothing in common with the GOP of today. Any decent student of American history will tell you pretty readily that the Republican Party of Lincoln's time more closely resembles the Democrats of today and that the Whig party much more closely resembled today's Republicans.

  6. Publishing? You mean DOXXING right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh wait... we hates the KKK so it's just "publishing" informaiton.

    Information we don't even have decent proof as to the nature of the source.

    Like Dan Rather's proof that Bush got preferential treatment - Until the documents were proved as forgeries - That's ok, he said, the documents are fake but what they said is true!

    So which is it? Do Slashdot's editors now agree that doxxing is good?

  7. a real false flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The data in this one makes no sense.

    This isn't Anon, this is someone else trying to discredit Anonymous before the real data comes out.

    1. Re:a real false flag by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      http://www.politicususa.com/20...

      4 US senators named so far, yet no denials or complaints by the senators in question yet. If this was fake, why wouldn't someone whose name is on it expose it as a fake?

  8. Re:The Klan Is Always Getting Bigger by TomR+teh+Pirate · · Score: 5, Informative

    The usefulness of your post notwithstanding, I heard in a news broadcast a few months ago (to my recollection) that the Klan's membership used to numbers in the millions at its peak and is now measured in tens of thousands. Happily, it's a club apparently on the decline.

  9. Questionable Accuracy: Include Gay, Latina Mayors by Koreantoast · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The short post of four US Senators and five US mayors includes one openly gay mayor and a older Latina woman who started her political career organizing Mexican laborers with Cesar Chavez. That alone casts a bit of doubt on the accuracy of this list.

    An alternative theory - a lot of these individuals may have signed up for these mailing lists simply to monitor these groups, and some of them may have just been signed up by other people as a prank. Just pulling information from a mailing list hardly represents membership.

  10. Re:Seriously? by ArylAkamov · · Score: 2

    They say it be as it is, comrade.

    But is not.

  11. The Reason for the Russian by Shoten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, a lot of people have been asking about this...asking why so many of the addresses end in ".ru"

    Fundamentally...think about it. Russia is a haven for a lot of different things, including bulletproof hosting that is beyond the reach of the FBI and other Western LEOs, either via direct raids, wiretaps or by more procedural means (subpoenas, etc.). So it entirely makes sense that people who are, in the truest sense of the word, interested in the overthrow of the US Government as it exists today should use email accounts that are hosted in Russia, far from the reach of the organizations that are out to get them.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  12. You're wasting your time, the Klan is a joke by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Klan as a mainstream group, even in the deep south, peaked in the 1920's. It had a brief minor resurgence in the 1960's during the civil rights movement, but for the most part it's a fringe-of-a-fringe-of-a-fringe movement and has been for most of its existence. Exposing them isn't even fighting racism, since their membership rolls today are made up of a tiny handful of disenfranchised rednecks who don't have any power to oppress or intimidate anyone. Hitting them today is like stabbing Julius Caesar several decades after his funeral. It's a pointless feel-good exercise that doesn't help anyone.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:You're wasting your time, the Klan is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Klan as a mainstream group, even in the deep south, peaked in the 1920's. It had a brief minor resurgence in the 1960's during the civil rights movement, but for the most part it's a fringe-of-a-fringe-of-a-fringe movement and has been for most of its existence. Exposing them isn't even fighting racism, since their membership rolls today are made up of a tiny handful of disenfranchised rednecks who don't have any power to oppress or intimidate anyone. Hitting them today is like stabbing Julius Caesar several decades after his funeral. It's a pointless feel-good exercise that doesn't help anyone.

      Don't forget those Tea Party bastards.. I move that 90% of them are KKK. David Duke is a confirmed Klansman who tried to run for President and also an extreme right wing, bat shit crazy republican. You see one there are 100s more you don't see, like cockroaches!

    2. Re:You're wasting your time, the Klan is a joke by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Unless of course the 4 Republican Senators so far listed are indeed KKK members. If so the rednecks aren't quite as disenfranchised as one might hope.

    3. Re:You're wasting your time, the Klan is a joke by swb · · Score: 2

      I'm just saying that if there's going to be a resurgence of the Civil Rights Movement in the form of Black Lives Matter (we'll see if that hasn't calmed down within the next year), there IS going to be a counter-movement as a reaction.

      I think that more or less, the general intensity of racism is less than it used to be. It's debatable what the reasons are, but because of this I think the kind of open, militant racism of the 1960s or earlier Klan or any other racist groups just won't fly, regardless of whether BLM becomes an enduring phenomenon or not.

      That being said, I think that despite increased racial acceptance, racial ill-feeling hasn't gone away completely, but become more muted and coded. But I think it would take something like open warfare in the streets to go back to the racism of the past.

      Trouble is, I don't discount open warfare in the streets..

  13. Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are dark times ahead for the KKK.

  14. First they came for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    First they came for the pedophiles. I was not a pedophile, so I did nothing.

    Then they came for the Klansmen. I was not a Klan member, so I did nothing.

    Then they came for the Anonymous Cowards who post on Slashdot.

    There was nobody left but me and my buddy CowboyNeal and we were no match for The Legion.

    What, not you too CowboyNeal. Nooooooo!!!!!!!

  15. Not dangerous? by Elfich47 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cases of arson, lynching, beatings, killings, cross burnings and voter suppression in an organized manner against a specific segment of the population? These activities have been ongoing for over a hundred years in a systematic manner? The frequency is down but it still occurs or is overlooked. I would call that terrorism at the very least.

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
    1. Re:Not dangerous? by Elfich47 · · Score: 2

      We're had cross burnings as recent as 2006 with intimidation and violations of the fair housing act. That recent enough for you?

      --
      Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
    2. Re:Not dangerous? by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Haven't heard much from Al Queda in a few years. Does that mean they're back on the Xmas card list?

  16. Unfortunately-- by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2, Funny

    --Anonymous also inadvertently published the identities of all the developers of the KDE Desktop. Presumably this was an error.

  17. Re:I look forward to the ISIS publication.... by thaylin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What is a terrorist?

    a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims.

    the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

    So are you saying that the KKK does not use violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims?

    --
    When you cant win, ad hominem.
  18. Re:The Klan Is Always Getting Bigger by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Freakonomics, they delve into one man's 30 year war against the KKK, where he broadcasts things like their secret rituals and so on, on radio shows, effectively turning them from a serious organization to a laughingstock few people (relatively) wanted to join, in the early part of the century.

    The vast bulk of damage to them is already long done. The point of the article was mockery, rather than outlawing, seemed to be much more productive.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  19. When was that again? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cases of arson, lynching, beatings, killings, cross burnings and voter suppression in an organized manner against a specific segment of the population?....The frequency is down but it still occurs or is overlooked.

    But when was the last time any of that happened? I have not seen stories about anything like that for many years - the most recent stuff being black churches set fire to, which it turned out was not don't by the KKK at all (who would seem to have been a primary suspect).

    I'm not saying the KKK has not been a horrible organization in the past, or even that they are in any way an organization that should be supported today. I'm saying that they have become essentially irrelevant, and the resources used to combat the "terrorists" of the KKK would be far better spent on real terrorists - but they aren't because the real terrorists can bite. Attacking the KKK like this is lame because it's pretending to help people while actually helping no-one.

    The KKK is dying, why even give them the publicity these attacks grant? It can only help the KKK at this point.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:When was that again? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Racism is alive and well. KKK is just not the most boisterous brand right now.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  20. Re:Publishing? You mean DOXXING right? by oakgrove · · Score: 2

    So if your name shows up in this dump, will that be a public service too? Because it most certainly could. What possible mechanism do you think exists to unequivocally verify whether any of these names denote actual members of the KKK before their reputations are irreparable tarnished?

    --
    The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
  21. Re:Publishing? You mean DOXXING right? by Coren22 · · Score: 2

    How is it no malicious? They intend for these people to be mobbed, it is the whole point of releasing the names.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  22. Re:I look forward to the ISIS publication.... by bmo · · Score: 2

    I don't think much of the KKK but to call them "terrorists" seems a pretty big stretch

    The KKK has done some pretty bad things over the past decades. On equal with what ISIS and other terrorists have done.

    Indeed the definition of terrorism is "the use of violence is the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes."

    http://withoutsanctuary.org/

    Tell me that was not violence for political purposes. Try me.

    Just because the lynchings aren't widespread anymore doesn't mean the other violence went away. And it's not just "Cletus the redneck douchebag" as a member, it's politicians and law enforcement.

    Yes, these people do need to be exposed. If this makes you uneasy, too bad.

    --
    BMO

  23. They have a "point" to make by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Oh great, now their hat sewing pattern is all over Interwebs. Thanks alot.

  24. Re:I'm not defending the Klan or anything... by shaitand · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But unlike being a criminal, being a Klan member indicates you are a bad person.

  25. Re:I look forward to the ISIS publication.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Oh wait, they are not doing anything to expose actual terrorists...

    Oh really? The only people that seems to have scared them off are the drug cartels.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  26. Re:The Klan Is Always Getting Bigger by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

    I don't like the Tea Party either, but there's plenty of legitimate stuff to complain about, we don't need to assign negative traits to them.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  27. "Redneck" is a racial slur. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The names of a thousand hateful red necks.

    "Redneck" is a racial slur. It insinuates that the target is, not just from a rural culture (especially - a poor white southern farmer), and not just sunburned on the back of his neck due to working outdoors with a short haircut, but also that he may be part American Indian. (It originates in a time where this was considered to be extremely "poor breeding", and many so-called "sundown towns" had laws requiring people with any American Indian genetics to be out of town by undown.

    It currently has an implication that the pepole it is applied to are unintelligent and uneducated. (The space program proves the lie of this: Note the accents of the people involved. A substantial fraction of real rocket scientists are, and were, rednecks.) This slur dates at least to the Scopes Monkey Trial (which was largely a propaganda piece fomented by the mining interests to brand the miners, who were trying to unionize at the time, as igorant idiots in the urban east coast's public perception.)

    Rule of thumb: If you don't self-identify as a redneck, and wouldn't use the "N" word, don't use the "R" word.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      and not just sunburned on the back of his neck due to working outdoors with a short haircut,

      That makes no sense, rednecks have mullets.

    2. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you just make all of that up? I can't find a single source that connects "redneck" with Native Americans, every definition I've seen ties it specifically to white people. Many today claim it as a badge of pride. And the Scopes Monkey Trial? That had nothing to do with unionizing miners, and everything to do with a publicity stunt to draw attention to the town of Dayton, TN. Mr. Scopes was even unsure whether he had ever taught evolution but incriminated himself anyway so that the trial could have a defendant. The miners that you're referring to were trying to unionize 5 years before Scopes and they wore red bandanas around their necks and self-identified as "rednecks" to help themselves organize and have solidarity. That label was not given to them by outside interests, they chose it.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did you just make all of that up? I can't find a single source that connects "redneck" with Native Americans, every definition I've seen ties it specifically to white people.

      I got it from my wife - trained as a historian, a member of Phi Alpha Theta (the historical honor society), redneck, and raised as a part American Indian.

      I'm not where I can consult her for references right now. If I think of it before this is off the front page I'll see if she can come up with some.

      Yes, the term is used on rural whites. As I said above, the bit about insinuating American Indian admixture is one of the several allegedly derogatory slurs embedded in the package.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    4. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

      The progressives have been very clear about trying to destroy the roots and symbols of rural culture in America. Religion and Guns? Clearly must be suppressed.

      It's particularly significant when you realize that:
        - The country was formed by and for "religious nuts with guns".
        - The separation of church and state was both:
                  - Central to the beliefs of the Plymouth colony settlers (the "Separatists" - often conflated with the "Puritans" who settled a few tens of miles further north), and
                  - Written into the Bill of Rights by the leaders of several churches (who knew damn well that, if the government had an official church, it wouldn't be theirs, but WOULD lead to the same sort of religious suppression and/or religious wars that they came here to escape.)

      From the viewpoint of the current "religious nuts with guns", the current suppression of the same is the result of a cultural war on them by later arrivals (including "The Ellis Island Crowd"), mainly lower-class descendants of serfs, who brought the elitist/royalist values the revolutionaries were trying to escape, and, rather than assimilating into the American Pluralist culture, decided to impose them, with the only substantial change being appointing themselves to a new class of nobles.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    5. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by russotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The space program proves the lie of this: Note the accents of the people involved.

      German?

    6. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WTF, really?

      Remember, it's not genocide if it's the enemy. The progressives have been very clear about trying to destroy the roots and symbols of rural culture in America. Religion and Guns? Clearly must be suppressed.

      I'm strongly opposed to gun control, but the arguments made by the other side are not without merit. A few gun owners have made their hobby/obsession a problem for the rest of us. Decent gun owners would be better served by reminding the rest of the population that they're not all a bunch of nutcases. Are you sure you're helping?

      Same for the "religion" half of your argument. Keep your guns out of my face and your religion as well, and we'll get along juuuuust fine.

      Deep family ties? Must financially punish marriage.

      Yeah, for definitions of "financially punish" that include "Stop subsidizing specific peoples' personal relationships at everyone else's expense." I'm all for that.

      Economy? The war on tobacco continues to destroy cash crops

      Of course, tens of thousands of cases of heart disease and cancer don't have any economic consequences at all, am I right?

      the war on coal decimating employment

      I'm not a global-warrming alarmist but you don't have to be one to recognize that digging up coal and burning it is a stupid, inefficient, wasteful, and generally harmful way to generate power. The sooner we get away from coal the better off we'll all be, and that includes the rural areas.

      and turning the education system into a proxy for the propaganda war has destroyed the education system there.

      Yeah, when we took Jeebus out of the classroom and started teaching evolution, I guess that's when things really started to go to hell, huh?

      This is exactly why sane people are starting to gang up against religion. Don't want a "propaganda war?" Don't start one.

    7. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think you have any idea what it is like to work in the sun, your neck stays pretty much untanned as getting the sun on it really heats you up, pretty much the reason why you should wear a wide brimmed hat. The red neck comes from when certain people with very pale necks lose their temper and they become flushed and as a result of having those pale necks they turn bright red. It is not red neck via race but via behaviour. Please do not include the majority of pink skins in your red neck assertions because by far the majority of pink skins are not red necks, this not because of some new assertion of further variegations of pink skin race to define more shades of pink but based upon intellect and behaviour. Red neck is a behavioural classification. Me and my lilly white butt take offence at your associating of red necks with all people of European ancestry, nope you get your red neck tag based upon the way you behave and choose to express yourself, nothing to be proud of either. They are found pretty much all over the globe, unfortunately. Bogans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... is another name for them, perhaps American red necks might prefer it, it definitely has a more descriptive ring to it.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by Panoptes · · Score: 2

      "he [a redneck] may be part American Indian"

      Can you give a citation, or is this just a pigment of your imagination?

    9. Re:"Redneck" is a racial slur. by silentcoder · · Score: 2

      That seems unlikely considering that around the world the term is used by people of Dutch and German ancestry to refer to people of British ancestry and has been that way since the early colonial days.

      Here at the South End of Africa "rooineck" is still a common slang term for "Englishman".

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  28. Re:The Klan Is Always Getting Bigger by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't know anything about the Tea Party except what you've been told by CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, etc. If you knew anything about them, you'd probably agree with them. Don't let your ignorance blind you.

    They are not a "hate" group and have plenty of black members. They even have a lot of members who are Democrats!

  29. Re:The Klan Is Always Getting Bigger by Rakarra · · Score: 4, Informative

    The usefulness of your post notwithstanding, I heard in a news broadcast a few months ago (to my recollection) that the Klan's membership used to numbers in the millions at its peak and is now measured in tens of thousands. Happily, it's a club apparently on the decline.

    The clan has had many rises and falls throughout history -- it hasn't been one continuous organization. This is the third Ku Klux Klan active. The first arose (and fell) during Southern Reconstruction after the Civil War, the second Klan was active between WWI and WWII (and was more concerned about Catholics, Jews, and immigrants moreso than black people), and the third arose post-World War II. Who knows if a fourth will ever arise. At first, I thought it would be more difficult in today's world of hyper-connectedness, but one of the side-effects is that it's now far easier for geographically-distant radicals to band together and enjoy their echo chamber.

  30. Re:I'm not defending the Klan or anything... by renderhead · · Score: 2

    Being a passive racist is not the same as joining a racist organization.

    --
    I wish that my inferiority complex were as good as yours.

    -RenderHead

  31. Re:Looks highly dubious to me... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    So, what you're saying is as long as the accusation is "KKK" it is okay to be guilty until proven innocent.

    Accusations are all you need? I think you might be a child molester and domestic terrorist.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  32. Re: The Klan Is Always Getting Bigger by kaatochacha · · Score: 2

    That's because they're so abysmally low, that two people joining today probably is a 10% bump.

    and, the Anonymous statement above "You seek to intimidate and/or eliminate those that are different from you and those that you dislike by any means possible" could equally be applied to Anonymous, just sayin....

  33. Re:The Klan Is Always Getting Bigger by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

    So wanting constitutionally limited government now equals being racist KKK terrorists?

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  34. Re:The Klan Is Always Getting Bigger by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

    Not only that but Black, Hispanic and South Asian Tea Party activists have been elected to congress (and the Senate).

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  35. Re:Hurray for suppressing dissent by TWX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What are the odds that those published will end up losing their jobs and such? You think that will end up causing more problems?

    This might be a better way to deal with things: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Those with whom we choose to associate say a lot about our character and about our choices. Choices are one thing that an employee can be judged-on. I see no reason for any employer to be compelled to retain anyone that is affiliated with an organization like this.

    As to your point about dialogue, that only works when the group being addressed is either well enough organized or small enough to be cohesive and for its members to operate as a single voice. Look at the fragmentation of the IRA during The Troubles, there were an uncountable number of splinter groups such that establishing a dialogue with one was no sure means to deal with all, an if anything could incite violence by the others.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  36. Re:Free breakfast for children. by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    al copone also started the first soup kitchen. Gangsers of all sorts always give back to the community (well the smart ones do)

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  37. Re:Hurray for suppressing dissent by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

    We should never allow people with unpopular opinions to have any privacy at all.

    Although I agree with you that this isn't a case where the violation of privacy is warranted, handwaving it away as an "unpopular opinion" is disingenuous and, frankly, betrays your credibility. You cannot behave as though free speech is more important than the safety of lots of people, then turn around and suddenly it's just a few inconsequential mutterings and any response shows just how petty one side is.

    Either free speech is powerful or it isn't, pick one and stick with it, you don't get to have your cake and eat it, too.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  38. Re:Hurray for suppressing dissent by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

    And the difference between that and the 50s with keeping anyone who didn't have a hard right wing imperialist streak from working in many fields is....what exactly?

    Remember boys and girls that your views may be mainstream NOW but that does NOT mean they will be mainstream in the future, and those same weapons you applaud being used against those you don't agree with can be easily used on you. If free speech is to be anything but an echo chamber mockery of the word we MUST protect the right of those we do not agree with to speak, otherwise your only freedom is the "freedom" to agree with the majority on everything.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  39. Re: Hurray for suppressing dissent by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Uhh that seems unrelated. These ppl are assholes who harrass/intimidate/etc others using their privacy.

    Why? It's one thing if they're a terrorist organization, but it's a whole other thing if they're just groveling among themselves about how much they hate x. Unless you can prove somebody has done something beyond simply being bigoted, then doxing them is an evil thing to do.

  40. Re:The Klan Is Always Getting Bigger by Barsteward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    their loudest voice is Sarah Palin, what more do you need to know?

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  41. Re: Hurray for suppressing dissent by Triklyn · · Score: 2

    and, it's troubling that it makes use of the "200 years" line.

    Unless you've got some highlanders under them there hoods, we generally, in the civilized world, don't hold people responsible for the sins of their fathers. Probably a vanishingly small fraction of the membership has ever taken part in a lynching. And there are laws to go after those people... you know the ones against murder.

    This is a troubling thing, going after americans for their associations.