Slashdot Mirror


TV Networks Open Neuroscience Labs To Improve Their Shows and Ads (reuters.com)

An anonymous reader writes: NBCUniversal's recently-opened Orlando neuroscience lab is trying to develop methods of delivering advertisements related to the scene in the show preceding them, such as delivering a food advertisement directly after a scene which has been shown to make test-subjects hungry. Viacom is building a lab right now to take electroencephalagrams of viewers while they watch. "And ratings firm Nielsen Holdings, which just bought neuroscience firm Innerscope Research earlier this year, is adding facial coding and biometrics to its labs, which currently conduct eye tracking and perform EEGs." NBC doesn't trust what viewers say when asked for their opinion on shows. They want to use science to determine which scenes trigger an emotional response, whether the viewer acknowledges it or not.

68 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinions by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> NBC doesn't trust what viewers say when asked for their opinion on shows.

    They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinions. How many people have you heard say naive things like "I'm not influenced by advertising" or "I do my own research"? And yet, advertising works, particularly because advertisers know where prospects go to "research" and get their pitches in there.

  2. It's not just individual scenes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Response to individual scenes can vary depending on the entirety of the plot. Limiting it to measuring response to scenes will result in shows being filmed for pavlovian dogs, not for actual human beings.

    1. Re:It's not just individual scenes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      shows being filmed for pavlovian dogs, not for actual human beings.

      You say that like there's a difference.
      *audience laughter*

    2. Re:It's not just individual scenes by sjritt00 · · Score: 1

      If they used this technology when The Sixth Sense came out, the promos would have shown the scene where Bruce Willis realized he was dead. I think that would have been the opposite of effective.

    3. Re:It's not just individual scenes by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      shows being filmed for pavlovian dogs, not for actual human beings.

      You say that like there's a difference. *audience laughter*

      +1, Insightful.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  3. so whats easier by nimbius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    telling a meaningful story with an engaging plot, complex dialogue and interesting characters? or pinching out another Avengers/Batman/Bond/Furious? studios have decided the easiest way to make money is to paint with a shotgun, so its no surprise we get cognitive neuroscience involved.

    The rules are already pretty simple: keep the dialogue at the 8th grade level and the characters simple. House is a meanie bo beanie, sheldon is a goofy nerd, and the team on NCIS follows such predictability they could be used as a canary to ensure a tv stations satellites were tracking properly. Combine your average sitcom with a healthy dose of product placement and well timed advertisements between painfully obvious and intentional cliffhangers and youve got yourself a riveting cinematic blockbuster thats sure to entertain some 300 pound navel-gazing white trash single mom for at least the 30 minutes it takes to chug a soda and finish a cold pizza.

    the devils in the details. You cant expect to gain 10-15% profit quarterly and assume a product anything less than C grade is going to come out of the effort. it means rehash concepts, repeat plotlines, and a whole lot of commercial time. It means squeezing out stinkers like minions and then skull-fucking parents into everything from online games to fast food and clothing tie-ins because you dont have time for ideas. Exploiting basic human urges is simply a more cost effective means to ensure people who already watch this shit, continue to watch it.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:so whats easier by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Totally agree with everything you just said.

      Exploiting basic human urges is simply a more cost effective means to ensure people who already watch this shit, continue to watch it.

      This doesn't apply only to TV and consumerism. Conscious manipulation of large populations goes at least as far back as our transition from hunter-gatherers to storers of food and, by extension, wealth. It may go back even farther. It's the old 'bread and circuses' concept. But at some point the people being manipulated catch on to the fact, and then revolution is likely. I keep wondering why we haven't had one already - perhaps people are now so brainwashed that they will never wake up?

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    2. Re:so whats easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      > why we haven't had one already

      I don't have or watch tv. I have a comfortable life as do those around me. Food is cheap, most things that you can buy are relatively cheap, historically wise. Housing is cheap if you don't live in a major city. Even education is cheap when adjusted for wage premium.

      What do I have to gain by revolting?

    3. Re:so whats easier by wings · · Score: 1

      It's the old 'bread and circuses' concept. But at some point the people being manipulated catch on to the fact, and then revolution is likely. I keep wondering why we haven't had one already - perhaps people are now so brainwashed that they will never wake up?

      I think we've perfected the circuses part. Between the hundreds of TV channels, cellphones, and Internet, the circuses are essentially perpetual. When you get bored with one, you'll find a nearly endless supply available at the touch of a button. You have no time for a revolution if you're busy searching for the next cat video on Youtube.

    4. Re:so whats easier by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      > why we haven't had one already

      I don't have or watch tv. I have a comfortable life as do those around me. Food is cheap, most things that you can buy are relatively cheap, historically wise. Housing is cheap if you don't live in a major city. Even education is cheap when adjusted for wage premium.

      What do I have to gain by revolting?

      Nothing. The revolution is not imminent. Things would have to get a lot worse for that, and we should all hope things don't degenerate that far.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    5. Re:so whats easier by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      telling a meaningful story with an engaging plot, complex dialogue and interesting characters? or pinching out another Avengers/Batman/Bond/Furious? studios have decided the easiest way to make money is to paint with a shotgun, so its no surprise we get cognitive neuroscience involved.

        The rules are already pretty simple: keep the dialogue at the 8th grade level and the characters simple. House is a meanie bo beanie, sheldon is a goofy nerd, and the team on NCIS follows such predictability they could be used as a canary to ensure a tv stations satellites were tracking properly. Combine your average sitcom with a healthy dose of product placement and well timed advertisements between painfully obvious and intentional cliffhangers and youve got yourself a riveting cinematic blockbuster thats sure to entertain some 300 pound navel-gazing white trash single mom for at least the 30 minutes it takes to chug a soda and finish a cold pizza.

        the devils in the details. You cant expect to gain 10-15% profit quarterly and assume a product anything less than C grade is going to come out of the effort. it means rehash concepts, repeat plotlines, and a whole lot of commercial time. It means squeezing out stinkers like minions and then skull-fucking parents into everything from online games to fast food and clothing tie-ins because you dont have time for ideas. Exploiting basic human urges is simply a more cost effective means to ensure people who already watch this shit, continue to watch it.

      Here's the thing.

      A broadcast (network) TV show shows TV programming to sell ads. So the goal is to attract as many eyeballs as possible during the programming, in the hopes that it carries onto the ads.

      Ad breaks carry the same "ratings" that programming does - and Neilsen makes their money selling those numbers to studios, who use them to sell blocks of ad time to advertisers. For example, a popular show like the Big Bang Theory might demand $250,000 per 30-second block, per episode based on ratings.

      So network TV optimize their programming choices to maximize the desirable 18-49 audience during prime time (it is assumed the under-18s and 50+ crowd are reachable at other cheaper times) , because they want to attract eyeballs. So you will get plots that are repetitive, because they score well with the target audience.

      If you want originally clever programming, you need to go to a model where it's not the number of eyeballs you need, but some other factor. HBO, Netflix etc., use the "subscribers" as the other factor - their goal is to create programming that's attractive to subscribers - and more importantly, will attract new subscribers. They also do market studies and manipulations, this time with the goal of identifying the most likely subset of the population who would subscribe to their service - they don't want programming to appeal to the masses - they want programming that will target those with money to subscribe to the service.

      The other method of funding is public funding, like PBS, which tries to be able to do anything because they don't have advertisers to appease, nor subscribers to chase away, so they can run more controversial programming or programming that doesn't have to appeal to the masses - like educational programming.

    6. Re:so whats easier by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      > why we haven't had one already

      I don't have or watch tv. I have a comfortable life as do those around me. Food is cheap, most things that you can buy are relatively cheap, historically wise. Housing is cheap if you don't live in a major city. Even education is cheap when adjusted for wage premium.

      What do I have to gain by revolting?

      And the vast majority of people in the Matrix were similarly content.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  4. Like in Max Headroom! by VAXcat · · Score: 2

    Blipverts!

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    1. Re:Like in Max Headroom! by Greger47 · · Score: 1

      More blipverts for the people!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:Like in Max Headroom! by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      From a technology standpoint, it would be tricky. A lot of what was cool in 1987-1988 is commonplace today. It'd be more like "5 minutes into the future" rather than the aforementioned 20.

      That said, the stories were generally pretty good and would be a bit more topical today than they were back in the late 80s...

  5. Great, great. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    The best we can hope for is that this is just some snake-oil fad that the ad guys sold the networks on.

    If it actually works, it's just another step in the systematic exploitation of human cognitive limitations and bounded rationality. Exactly what wouldn't improve this situation. I hope the researchers are...suitably proud...of the good work they are doing there.

    1. Re:Great, great. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      The best we can hope for is that this is just some snake-oil fad that the ad guys sold the networks on. If it actually works, it's just another step in the systematic exploitation of human cognitive limitations and bounded rationality. Exactly what wouldn't improve this situation. I hope the researchers are...suitably proud...of the good work they are doing there.

      I am acquainted with a woman who works in advertising and is fond of saying, "I made you buy that." They know what they're doing and are too blinded by greed to care.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  6. Re:Subliminal by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    >> Why don't they just start allowing subliminal adverts in 1 or 2 frames again?

    Too easy to pick out and beat on in social media in our digital age.

  7. sigh... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    This doesn't bode well for future screenplays. Once they figure out what works, they'll write the scripts to sell the products. We'll be nostalgic for the days of mere product placement.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:sigh... by Crowd+Computing · · Score: 1

      That's the least of my concerns. If they figure out how to really make this work, the viewers will be effectively reduced to Pavlov's dogs.

    2. Re:sigh... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      This doesn't bode well for future screenplays. Once they figure out what works, they'll write the scripts to sell the products. We'll be nostalgic for the days of mere product placement.

      You say this like it's not happening already.

      http://herocomplex.latimes.com/movies/star-wars-was-born-a-long-time-ago-but-not-all-that-far-far-away-in-1972-filmmakers-george-lucas-and-gary-kurtz-wer/

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    3. Re:sigh... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      WTF do you think they've been doing since the dawn of the medium? They're not writing them for you to be happy. They're writing them to sell you something, even if it's just to sell you a continued subscription to a premium channel. That you like it is just incidental. If they could force it on you and have similar effects then they would.

      This is not some altruistic thing where they write shows that people like. They write shows that people like to sell shit.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  8. Jokes on you by buk110 · · Score: 1

    Jokes on you pal - I DVR all my shows and fast forward through the commercials. Sure you can pump in a ton of subliminal messaging, but those 30 second clips are never seen

    1. Re:Jokes on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's OK. You can wait for the next generation of it - when they customize scenes so you get the product placement which fits the emotions created in the previous scene. Already been done (Starter Wife,) just not adopted wide-scale yet.

    2. Re:Jokes on you by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      I tend to do that, too.

      That said, sometimes something catches my eye when I fast forward and I get curious and go back and see. So that's an interesting angle to look at--how to make you stop fast-forwarding.

  9. Uh-oh! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I don't think they are going to like what they find.

    I can't be the only one repulsed by the present day ads.

    Especially during daytime - it's creeping to evenings now.

    Because women are leaky things that spew matter from every orifice, men are the opposite, they have to put thingys up their weiners so they can pee. Drugs that might make you go on a killing rampage.

    Vaginal mesh, mesothelioma, Call us so we can see who you can sue! Some wacky lady who is obsessed with pooping, and probiotics. J.G. Wentworth "It's my money and I need cash now!"

    Dancing millenials. Did I mention dancing millenials? Do we have to have dancing millenials break into a dance because their Totino's pizza rolls came out of the microwave? Or found a piece of furniture online?

    When they tortured the guy in A Clockwork Orange" they could have just used today's commercials.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Uh-oh! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I used to switch on the TV while the wife was in the shower for fifteen minutes

      That's a euphemism for "masturbating to porn" I've not heard before.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  10. Just kill off the drug ads by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 2

    Seriously, things are pretty bad when every other ad is for some obscure prescription drug. I mean really, how many people have non-24 to the point of justifying an expensive TV ad? And the ads are stupid, too. Show a bunch of people going about their daily lives set to music while the narrator spends 50 seconds telling you about all the possible side-effects. Dumb.

    1. Re:Just kill off the drug ads by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I once made a tongue in cheek remark that the best thing about election years was that they temporarily bumped off the stupid drug ads for the stupid political ads.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:Just kill off the drug ads by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Television is not for everyone. Side-effects may include nausea, sleeplessness, fatigue, boredom, agitation, impulsive thoughts, hemorrhoids, weight-gain, apathy, loss of creativity, and a lack of meaningful connection with other human beings. These side-effects may worsen depending on content. Tell your doctor about any programs you may be watching, and whether you recently changed content-providers. Do not watch television if you have homework or any other important task to do that requires concentration.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  11. Neuroscience to improve ads? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    We have ads everywhere these days, except in our dreams.

    Fight for your bitcoins!

  12. I was with you until... by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 2

    thats sure to entertain some 300 pound navel-gazing white trash single mom for at least the 30 minutes it takes to chug a soda and finish a cold pizza

    Why would you ruin a perfectly valid critique with this kind of insulting, racist, classists nonsense?

    1. Re:I was with you until... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      What truth was stated? Are there some 100/200/300/400 pound navel-gazing white/black/red/yellow/green trash single/married/divorced mom/dad who will site around and watch sh*t and chug soda/beer and finish a cold pizza/burrito?

      So what?

      And there are also very fit, very educated, very well-adjusted people who also watch sh*t.

      I like Game of Throne and don't like Big Bang Theory. The front-end developer to the left of me loves Big Bang Theory (loves Sheldon) and dislikes GOT.

      And ... ???

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    2. Re:I was with you until... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Don't know why you think I'm interested in Marx. I'm more interested in von Mises, Hayek, Friedman, Ayn Rand than I am Marx. And for each of them, including Rand, it's not their bodies I'm interested in.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    3. Re:I was with you until... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Why would you ruin a perfectly valid critique with this kind of insulting, racist, classists nonsense?

      This language kinda suggests it. Sorry if I was incorrect.

    4. Re:I was with you until... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      thats sure to entertain some 300 pound navel-gazing white trash single mom for at least the 30 minutes it takes to chug a soda and finish a cold pizza

      Why would you ruin a perfectly valid critique with this kind of insulting, racist, classists nonsense?

      Yeah, how dare he talk about you mom on the internets.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:I was with you until... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Don't know why you think I'm interested in Marx. I'm more interested in von Mises, Hayek, Friedman, Ayn Rand than I am Marx. And for each of them, including Rand, it's not their bodies I'm interested in.

      When will you people realise that Ayn Rand is a laughing stock outside the US? I disagree with most of von Mises, Hayek and Friedman's ideas, but at least they're not totally evil and stupid.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:I was with you until... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      You people? Which people is that? People who don't think they're part of the greater collective?

      And why should anyone care, or base their opinion on what other people think?

      You think individual liberty is a foolish idea; a remnant from the 18th C? OK. You think of yourself as a subject to those in political power as opposed to a citizen? OK. Have fun being part of the herd, the greater collective.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  13. Re:Subliminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Next time you fast forward through commercials on your DVR pay attention to what parts/logos are still visible.

    Also having written analysis code for this type of thing (article) that's probably still in use, my bad ya'll. ..eat snacky smores

  14. Re:Yet Again Ads Do Not Inform - They Manipulate by grub · · Score: 1

    Back when Safeway had its loyalty card program, a bunch of us would swap cards when we met up or had a party, etc.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  15. It's the new lie detector by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Law enforcement will love this stuff.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  16. Uhh by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    People still watch tv?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  17. Re:They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinion by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

    They need to come up with adverts that are less annoying than poking myself in the eye with a darning needle

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  18. Re:They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinion by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    >> NBC doesn't trust what viewers say when asked for their opinion on shows.

    They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinions. How many people have you heard say naive things like "I'm not influenced by advertising" or "I do my own research"? And yet, advertising works, particularly because advertisers know where prospects go to "research" and get their pitches in there.

    This article should disabuse anyone of the notion that they are not influenced by advertising. They are studying brain physiology in order to sell you stuff! They are operating on a subconscious level that many people aren't even aware exists! We have little defense if our conscious mind doesn't even enter into the equation. And if you think these techniques are just used to make you want hamburgers, think again.

    Advertising and other forms of subconscious manipulation are used to sell you wars, government policies and political candidates. People think their opinions are their own, but often they have just been selected from a menu presented to them by the media.

    Yeah, advertising works. Millions if not billions of dollars have been spent to understand how you think, what motivates you, and how to influence that without your knowledge. Anyone who thinks they are not affected is foolish and ignorant.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  19. Re:Yet Again Ads Do Not Inform - They Manipulate by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    I don't have a tv. I feel like I'm missing out.

    Don't worry, you're not. Television is only one vector.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  20. Re:They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinion by houghi · · Score: 1

    |NO. They should not show any ads at all. On the one side you have people who do not want advertising. On the other side you have companies that want to have adversiting 100% of the time if not more.

    Saying that you agree with part of it is discussing the amount. For me that amount is 0. I do not want it on tv, on the streets, on my underwear. I do not want it.

    I understand that it excists. I understand that Ebola exists as well. That does not mean I can agree with 1% people dying from it instead of 10% (or whatever the numbers are). I want that number to be 0. I want the number of ads to be 0.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  21. Re:They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinion by sims+2 · · Score: 2

    I want to think that amazon/netflix/hulu/crunchyroll actually have a much better idea of what people actually watch. As they get the stats directly. Instead of a bunch of nelson's. Why is survivor still on? Its definitely not because people want to watch it.

    However there does seem to be a race to the bottom going on for tv programming If everything on is crap you just need the least crappy show to sell ads. So they don't try very hard anymore.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  22. Re:ads by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

    The people annoyed by ads are subsidizing your torrent experience.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  23. Re:Sarcasm by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    Maybe I was wrong to become a "cable cutter". This type of technology makes me want to sign back up! Manipulate me, big corps! I love being your bitch!

    Got news for you, pal. You're their bitch whether you have a TV or not. It's nigh inescapable these days.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  24. Just wait until next year by Minwee · · Score: 1

    Nielsen Holdings is also in negotiations to purchase neuroscience firm Voight and Kampff next year, and hopes to improve their ability to detect which programs and advertisements are being watched by human viewers and which are only being scanned by computers.

    "And now a word from our sponsors..."

    "Do you ever find yourself walking along in the desert when all of the sudden you look down and you see a tortoise crawling toward you? You reach down, you flip the tortoise over on it's back. The tortoise lays on it's back, it's belly baking in the hot sun, beating it's legs trying to turn itself over and enjoy the refreshing taste of New Diet Cloaca Cola..."

    1. Re:Just wait until next year by neminem · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but it is what I drink when one happens to drop and I need the mp. (And once upon a time, it was what you used if you needed to get beaten up to debuff yourself for some reason, via pop rocks explosion; these days it's better to just cheat at scratch 'n sniff stickering via url manipulation.)

      Well, regular cloaca cola is. The diet stuff from the white citadel (diet, in this case, meaning, according to the source, that it has more ice in it than regular cloaca cola) wouldn't ever be worth it.

  25. great news by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

    This is great news. I'd been concerned for some time that I want watching enough ads, and that those ads I did watch we're failing to translate into product purchases at a high enough rate.

    I'm really glad that they're putting serious resources, effort and scientific brainpower into improving my ad consumption. To those dedicated scientists devoting their research to this matter - I salute you.

  26. Just let us stream by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Remove artificial legal barriers to streaming, and all the mineable viewer information you want becomes available by just observing what we click on and how long we stay with each show and each episode. We are starting to see interactive features in ads, which means that recognition of this is seeping through even the skulls of studio execs.

    As Yogi Berra said, you can observe a lot just by watching.

    1. Re:Just let us stream by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I wonder if he really said that. A lot of things are attributed to Yogi that he never actually said.

      "I said a lot of things I didn't say." - Yogi Berra

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  27. Re:They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinion by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    Advertising works, but not necessarily the way they plan. One ad did a great job convincing me to buy a remedy for indigestion. The only problem is, they were trying to sell car insurance!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  28. 'Skip forward' several times, back to the program by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Do whatever you want to your commercials, I never see them anyway. Thanks TiVo!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  29. Re:They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinion by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Young grasshopper, there is much I could teach you.

    When effective marketing organizations lay out plans to get people to buy a product, they design around a concept called a "sales funnel" and map out the mental state of potential buyers in various states. These states include (at a high level) learning about whether or not they have a need, deciding they need a solution, deciding what solutions they are going to purchase, and deciding to pull the trigger on their preferred solution.

    Marketing organizations set up interactions designed to nudge buyers down the funnel at all stages, including the stages I listed: "do I have a problem" (often helped along by planted news stories with statistics like 74% of all health care companies fell prey to whatever) and "what solutions are available for this" (often helped along by seeding if not outright buying off a "trusted" reviewer or analyst). Throw in a couple of advertisements that reinforce the exposure of this or that brand name (which is also backed up by psychology), and suddenly you're another sheep buying Oracle.

    Are you keeping up now?

  30. Re:They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinion by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

    There's a car insurance ad I've been seeing a lot lately. Every time I see it, I want to buy a computer. And a hundred dollars worth of gum.

    --
    Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
  31. Is this harrassment? by See+Attached · · Score: 1

    When the subconscious is targeted, it's going to feel like manipulation. While not in favor of government regulations for things like this, it seems low-rent to mess with our heads... would imagine the targeting will be effective and us pawns will line up to eat sawdust more predictably. Joy. Win for humans Being. Bzzzzt.

    --
    Time for a new Political party in the US (or two!) One is off the rails Other cant pony up a leader.
  32. Re:'Skip forward' several times, back to the progr by See+Attached · · Score: 1

    Time shifting provides such relief. Tivo still sets the standard for something PEOPLE want.

    --
    Time for a new Political party in the US (or two!) One is off the rails Other cant pony up a leader.
  33. Re:They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinion by KGIII · · Score: 1

    You should the GGP's post's example perfectly. You're intelligent therefor you don't buy what the ads tell you. Heh... You should see the manipulation that goes on WITH YOU in something as simple as a grocery store. But no, not you... You're immune. I know... I know...

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  34. Re:ads by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Give them my thanks.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  35. Re:They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinion by Ian+A.+Shill · · Score: 1
    tl;dr: hamburgers

    >> NBC doesn't trust what viewers say when asked for their opinion on shows.

    They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinions. How many people have you heard say naive things like "I'm not influenced by advertising" or "I do my own research"? And yet, advertising works, particularly because advertisers know where prospects go to "research" and get their pitches in there.

    This article should disabuse anyone of the notion that they are not influenced by advertising. They are studying brain physiology in order to sell you stuff! They are operating on a subconscious level that many people aren't even aware exists! We have little defense if our conscious mind doesn't even enter into the equation. And if you think these techniques are just used to make you want hamburgers, think again.

    Advertising and other forms of subconscious manipulation are used to sell you wars, government policies and political candidates. People think their opinions are their own, but often they have just been selected from a menu presented to them by the media.

    Yeah, advertising works. Millions if not billions of dollars have been spent to understand how you think, what motivates you, and how to influence that without your knowledge. Anyone who thinks they are not affected is foolish and ignorant.

    --
    For hire.
  36. Re:They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinion by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Are you willing to pay lots of money for broadcast TV, or basic cable channels? Advertising is the only viable source of income for most media outlets. What you want isn't relevant if it's totally unrealistic.

    This is an absolute lie. Movies and shows make millions on on-demand viewers, merchandising, etc. The truth is advertising is just an additional revenue stream.

  37. Re:They shouldn't trust people's expressed opinion by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    |NO. They should not show any ads at all. On the one side you have people who do not want advertising. On the other side you have companies that want to have adversiting 100% of the time if not more.

    Saying that you agree with part of it is discussing the amount. For me that amount is 0. I do not want it on tv, on the streets, on my underwear. I do not want it.

    I understand that it excists. I understand that Ebola exists as well. That does not mean I can agree with 1% people dying from it instead of 10% (or whatever the numbers are). I want that number to be 0. I want the number of ads to be 0.

    Advertising is an inevitable part of consumer capitalism.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  38. Re:Yet Again Ads Do Not Inform - They Manipulate by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Back when Safeway had its loyalty card program, a bunch of us would swap cards when we met up or had a party, etc.

    Yeah! Fight the power!

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  39. Re:Yet Again Ads Do Not Inform - They Manipulate by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    I don't have a tv. I feel like I'm missing out.

    Don't worry, you're not. Television is only one vector.

    There are no ads on the internet though. Just intelligent people having sensible conversations and exchanging free ideas and information.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  40. Re:ads by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Ads? What are those? I'm afraid my torrent provider doesn't offer this service.

    u r so 1337

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it