Slashdot Mirror


Full Text of Trans-Pacific Partnership Released (Officially, This Time) (mfat.govt.nz)

EmagGeek writes: The full text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, has been officially released, and is available for the public to see. According to CNN, The TPP is a 12-nation deal that touches on 40% of the global economy. The provisions of the deal would knock down tariffs and import quotas, making it cheaper to import and export, and open new Asia-Pacific markets. Negotiations have been going on for years, led by the United States and Japan — with China conspicuously absent from the list of signees.

12 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. This is fantastic. by gavron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I once went on a date where the girl said "I am going to set everything up. It will be a surprise. You'll like it! Don't try to guess what's going to happen!"

    It was a great time!

    The TTP is almost like that. We don't know what's coming until it does; we all get fucked; big pharma and big media have a great time.

    E

    1. Re:This is fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      we all get fucked; big pharma and big media have a great time

      Pretty much this.

      This agreement is mostly about giving corporations a wish list of things which in general won't benefit citizens.

      Because America are so fucking beholden to corporate interests they're pretty much fucking over the world to benefit multinational corporations. Stupid shit like being able to sue governments if they don't like how a law impacts them.

      Thanks, assholes, for letting your corrupt politicians on the payroll of corporations to fuck up the world. We really fucking appreciate it.

      This is pretty much the nail in the coffin for societies which are rules by governments instead of corporations.

      Fucking stupid fucking American bullshit fucking libertarian fantasy economics in which we all get fucked for corporations is magically going to improve our fucking lives.

      Fuck you America, fuck you.

    2. Re:This is fantastic. by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So the TPP is all about movies, drugs, and sex that one partner enjoys way more than the other?

      Sure, if you mean using date rape drugs and filming it ... because that's pretty much what this stupid deal is doing to us.

      It's a grab bag of stuff from the wishlist of multinational corporations, pushed through by people who are more beholden to corporate profits than their own citizens, and largely written by the industries it benefits.

      Mark my words, this really is just more "race to the bottom" crap, and won't benefit citizens.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:This is fantastic. by Zak3056 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're welcome? It's not like we (citizens) have any say in what our government does. That's the greatest illusion in history. Federal elections are decided by who has the most money from "Special interests".

      The older I get, the more I reject that notion. Sure, the media is manipulating you and election season is a three ring circus, and yes, there is undoubtedly election fraud that nudges things a bit, but in the end, the people still vote, and the people elect the government they deserve. Everyone pretty much agrees with YOUR statement, "special interests blah blah blah" but upwards of 90% of you (at least the ones that vote) KEEP VOTING FOR THE SAME PEOPLE! What the fuck do you expect is going to happen?

      Douglas Adams summed the situation up really well in So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish:

      “On its world, the people are people. The leaders are lizards. The people hate the lizards and the lizards rule the people.”

      “Odd,” said Arthur, “I thought you said it was a democracy.”

      “I did,” said Ford. “It is.”

      “So,” said Arthur, hoping he wasn’t sounding ridiculously obtuse, “why don’t the people get rid of the lizards?”

      “It honestly doesn’t occur to them,” said Ford. “They’ve all got the vote, so they all pretty much assume that the government they’ve voted in more or less approximates to the government they want.”

      “You mean they actually vote for the lizards?”

      “Oh yes,” said Ford with a shrug, “of course.”

      “But,” said Arthur, going for the big one again, “why?”

      “Because if they didn’t vote for a lizard,” said Ford, “the wrong lizard might get in.”

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  2. It also does away with national sovereigty! by pecosdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you want to outlaw something traded under this agreement in your own country?
    Nope! Your government will be tried in an international court!

    Want to legalize something not legal in this agreement or buy it from a supplier not under the agreement while one who is under it sells it at a higher price?
    Nope! Your government will be tried in an international court!

    Trade is only the excuse for this agreement. Just like the patriot act and affordable care act specifics are so vague it to allow any interpretation desired by those who head up the agreement. It's also structures in such a way that nations not complying with changes afterward will be punished. This is not an "agreement" as it's called, it's a treaty. Notice corporation wrote most of it.

    This is the official handing over of the government to corporations. It's been happening in practice, but that pesky constitution and balance of powers occasionally gets in the way. This is the bypass for it.

    If you DON'T bully your representatives, beg, plead and even threaten them to keep this from passing we're all going to be part of the "expanded EU".

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:It also does away with national sovereigty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do realize that "Canada's Trudeau" has only been in power for like, two days, right? He literally started yesterday morning. If you want to blame a Canadian leader for TPP, blame Harper like the Canadians do.

  3. We have to pass it to see what's in it by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That usually works out well, right?

  4. Remember Trump and Sanders by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Remember that only 2 people are against this: Trump and Sanders. The Clinton's gave us NAFTA and fully supported this agreement as the gold standard. The Republicans always push for "free trade". For the sake of yourselves and your children vote either Trump or Sanders. If it weren't for "free trade" we'd all be making approximately double what we are now as shown here:

    http://www.theatlantic.com/bus...

    or here:

    http://www.epi.org/blog/inequa...

    1. Re:Remember Trump and Sanders by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Protectionism is a good way to make an economy poor. People have this ideal that they'll make twice as much salary and have a bigger piece of the pie, except they don't realize the pie just gets smaller.

    2. Re:Remember Trump and Sanders by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the domestic scale sure on the international scale not always the case. What you have said has been in the economics text books so long most people accept it uncritically but it fails to consider the long term effects of trade imbalances.

      Generally with a nation as large and divers as ours with an array of resources as vast as ours one would be tempted to think trade imbalances could not occur but they do. The problem the free traders consistently fail to deal with is that the economies of our trading partners are not in many cases as market oriented as our own and our own economy is not really a true open market anymore either. The rules over and above the enforcement of private property rights create opportunities to game the system and so the system gets gamed.

      If we were to:
      Drop the new Obamacare employer mandates
      Drop the individual mandate
      Drop all payroll and corporate taxes
      Replace income taxes with a flat tax
      Either rollback health/safety and environmental protections -or- restrict trade to nations with comparable regulation and enforcement

      Then we could have free trade with the remaining partners. Otherwise the ability to game the system is always going to temp people to shop the market the imposes the least penalty for the negative externalizes of whatever it is they do and lowest cost labor while still selling the output of that production into the more lucrative American market and enjoying the gifts of our society themselves. Their will be a net outflow of wealth until the US reaches nearer equilibrium in terms of median personal wealth with the rest of the world. I know there are many on the left of the political graph who think there is Justice in that, and may influencers on the Right side who don't care because they are 1%ers doing the gaming and don't care what happens to the rest of us.

      Personally I'd rather the USA stay the worlds richest nation! That is almost certain to be whats best for me, my family, and my friends. I have no desire to try and hold any other nation down or prevent the expansion of the middle class around the world. Good luck to them, but I see no reason we need to give away what's ours to enable that. Now some lefties are going to return to say we unfairly came by what we have. Yes okay maybe if you want to say we took the land from the Natives, but other than that no not really if you look at the whole of those situations and the alternatives.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  5. Mass, subterrainian civil disobedience by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is such an over-reach, especially the intellectual property parts, it's going to lead to mass civil disobedience in the form of a fundamental attitudinal shift from one of basically respecting the law to one of basically disrespecting it *on the part of everyone* including society's intellectuals, academics and cultural leaders.

    That's the deeper danger of this kind of law making, not to mention the content of the law itself. It leads to contempt for the law, contempt for Congress , the Executive and the Judiciary. Contempt leads to mass, defacto civil disobedience where ignoring or subverting the law becomes the norm, as in the days of prohibition.

    How is this good for the country?
     

  6. Re:First post, substantive by bigpat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The agreement merely asks countries to "recognise" [sic] and "acknowledge" the importance of the public domain. This contrasts with the provisions on copyright and patents, which demand compliance in many instances, including the following example on "Criminal Procedures and Penalties" (Art. 18.77):

    That hits the nail on the head... All the parts that screw people over are iron clad, specified to the extreme while all the consumer, labor, environmental protections are all fluffy piles of bull shit wrapped in language you could drive a truck full of slaves through to their coal fired baby seal killing factory.