Slashdot Mirror


NASA's Maven Mission Solves the Mystery of Mars' Lost Atmosphere

StartsWithABang writes: If you came to the Solar System some 500 million years after its formation, you would've found two world with oceans of liquid water, continents and all the conditions we know of for life to begin thriving: Earth and Mars. But unlike our own world, Mars' organic history was cut short when it lost its atmosphere and became a barren, desert wasteland. While we had some pretty compelling theories as to how this happened, it was only with the advent of the Maven mission and its first science results that we discovered exactly how, how fast and when Mars lost its atmosphere. One cool discovery: aurorae appear diffuse and all over the entire night sky on Mars!

120 comments

  1. Summary missing information by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary is missing important information. As TFA discusses, the primary issue was (as already strongly suspected) the loss of the magnetic field around Mars. With only a very weak magnetic field nothing protected the planet's atmosphere from the solar wind which blasted the atmosphere away over a time span probably in the hundreds of millions of years. This last result, the slow loss of the atmosphere is a genuinely novel and important discovery because as TFA discusses this makes it more plausible that if there was life on Mars that it would have had time to evolve to survive the gradually harsher environment. The research also suggests that Mars will become completely airless in around 2 billion years.

    1. Re:Summary missing information by raind · · Score: 1

      And the magnetic field stopped why? Do we know for what is in Earths core?

      --
      Get up!
    2. Re:Summary missing information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      meanwhile Venus without intrinsic magnetic field and closer to the sun has an atmosphere thicker than earth

    3. Re:Summary missing information by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Informative

      And the magnetic field stopped why?

      Mars, being half the diameter of Earth, has a higher surface to volume ratio. Thus, it cooled faster. Presumably the liquid core froze, or at least, enough of it froze to stop the dynamo of molten metal that creates the magnetic field

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    4. Re:Summary missing information by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      Try the NASA site, here:
      http://lasp.colorado.edu/home/...

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    5. Re:Summary missing information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Gravity. Venus has about 0.8 the mass of the Earth. Mars has about 0.1 of the mass. That's a big difference. Without that extra mass, Mars doesn't have the gravity to hold in the atmosphere, so the solar wind is strong enough to strip it away. On Venus, there's plenty of mass to generate gravity which keeps the atmosphere in place with more force than the solar wind has to strip it. On Earth, there's even more gravity plus a magnetic shield that negates the solar wind completely.

    6. Re:Summary missing information by halivar · · Score: 2

      Also, that thicker atmosphere's convection current generates an intense magentosheath that protects from solar winds. In a way, Venus's atmosphere is self-bootstrapped.

    7. Re:Summary missing information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course lacking a strong/stable global magnetic field will allow the solar wind to slowly blow away a planets atmosphere, but it isn't the only big reason Mars lost the majority of what it used to have.

      The other reason is of course he planets low mass.

      Venus also lacks a nice protective magnetic field and is much closer to the Sun, but it still has a crushingly dense atmosphere. We've seen that the solar wind is eating away at it as well, but due to the larger mass and deeper gravity well, that planet was able to hold onto its gas (the carbon dioxide at least).

    8. Re:Summary missing information by dryeo · · Score: 1

      And yet Mercury has quite a magnetic field, especially for its size and Venus has none even though only 10% smaller then the Earth.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    9. Re:Summary missing information by maugle · · Score: 1

      Mercury gets plenty of heat from the sun and has an absolutely huge metal core.
      Not sure about Venus, though. Maybe it has a smaller core than you'd expect for a planet its size? It's difficult to tell, since its atmosphere has a nasty habit of melting all our probes.

    10. Re:Summary missing information by dryeo · · Score: 0

      I doubt that the heat from the Sun makes a difference, it's still cooler then Venus. The huge metal core, perhaps. There's also the question of how much radioactives are in the various planets cores.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    11. Re:Summary missing information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, as far as mercury in its present state is, it is the core of some previous world. Mercury had almost all its mantel ripped away from a massive collision....at least that's the going theory.

    12. Re:Summary missing information by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Venus has a mass comparable to Earth's. Mars' mass is 1/10th Earth's. While it's nice to put hard numbers to it, the reason why Mars' atmosphere got blown away isn't hard to understand.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    13. Re:Summary missing information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let me get this straight: the 8 page article with pictures and videos had more information than the 4 sentence summary?

      The problem is precisely that it is not a summary, but a clickbait paragraph. The title mentions a mystery solved, but you get zero info about it by reading the non-summary.

    14. Re:Summary missing information by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      So our solar system rolled at least 4 times with the dice, and won only once.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    15. Re:Summary missing information by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The summary is missing important information.

      No it isn't. The summary is providing just enough information to force you to go to the site for the answer. Look at the author. He didn't miss anything, he calculated the required amount of clickbaitness.

    16. Re: Summary missing information by oobayly · · Score: 1

      I haven't looked at the numbers, but could tidal forces have a heating effect?

    17. Re:Summary missing information by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Once? Where?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:Summary missing information by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      It does.
      The surface temperature of Mercury is hot enough that e.g. lead is melting.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    19. Re:Summary missing information by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      That man? Jesus.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    20. Re:Summary missing information by wardrich86 · · Score: 2

      TFS reads like clickbait. It takes about an issue, says they figured out what caused the issue, but never says what the issue is.

    21. Re:Summary missing information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must have been one big fireplace....

    22. Re: Summary missing information by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Mercury is in resonance with the Sun (3:2) so tidal forces should be minor. The orbit is also fairly circular.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    23. Re:Summary missing information by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Venus also has a surface temperature that will melt lead. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      With a mean surface temperature of 735 K (462 C; 863 F), Venus is by far the hottest planet in the Solar System, even though Mercury is closer to the Sun.

      Temperature of Mercury from the wiki,

      Surface temp. min mean max
      0N, 0W [10] 100 K 340 K 700 K
      85N, 0W[10] 80 K 200 K 380 K

      I see someone marked me overrated for pointing this out.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    24. Re:Summary missing information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC the fact that Venus rotates so slowly about it axis means that it wouldn't generate a significant magnetic field even if the core was still molten.

    25. Re:Summary missing information by chilenexus · · Score: 1

      Venus has a higher average temperature than any other planet - the clouds do a good job at distributing the heat fairly evenly about the planet regardless of the latitude, season, or whether it is day or night.

      Mercury has a lower average because there's nothing holding heat in on the night side. It does, however, hold the record for the greatest temperature difference in the solar system, between the day and night halves.

    26. Re: Summary missing information by dryeo · · Score: 1

      My apologies, seems that Mercury has the largest orbital eccentricity of the planets and therefore 17 times higher tides then the Earth. Still sounds like the magnetic field is caused by the extra large core which is probably still molten from formation.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    27. Re:Summary missing information by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Actually judging by the amount of sulfur and potassium in the crust, it was not involved in a giant collision. leading theory is that during formation the solar wind drove away the lighter materials with another theory that it was so heated that it had a rock vapor atmosphere which the solar wind drove away.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    28. Re:Summary missing information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The magnetic field is the bigger story. Many press discussions paid scant attention to this. How and why did Mars lose it's magnetic field?

      Furthermore very few discussed how Mars has an orbit outside of Earth's, and thus the pressure of the solar wind is much less on Mars than Earth (inverse square law applies). In fact take that farther.

      Venus has an orbit even farther in and yet has a notably thick atmosphere, thicker than either Mars or Earth. How did Venus protect it's atmosphere? Presumably a strong magnetic field, yet Venus is smaller than Earth, though larger than Mars. If size were the crucial differentiator for having a durable magnetic field, Venus is difficult to explain.

      That's not to say Venus cannot be explained. Mars is much smaller than Earth and Venus. But do we know the planetary dynamics or are we still in the realm of speculation here?

    29. Re:Summary missing information by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Probes don't matter for getting the gross composition of the planet. Since the 1770s (when we got the scale of the solar System from the successful observation of a transit of Venus, and returned the data and did the calculations) we've known that Venus weigh about 5*10^24 kg, has a volume of about 9*10^11 km^3 (I'm being deliberately vague, as our precision has improved over the centuries), for a density of 5.3 tonnes/ m^3.

      Bulk rocks have density between 2.5 and 3.1. With compression in the depths that gets up to about 3.5. Clearly there must be something denser somewhere. After that, it's question of trying to match the bulk density and the distribution of mass to get the same figures. Which you do need to fly a probe past, and track it's path carefully. Though you could get the same data (more slowly) with multiple natural asteroids)

      Putting probes onto the surface of Venus will tell us the density of the surface rocks. But they're a trivial part of the question. To get to 1% of the volume of the planet, you'd need to measure the density of the average rocks down to a depth of 20km. We can't do that on Earth without a global network of seismographs (to measure seismic propagation velocities, from which we can deduce the density, with some assumptions).

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    30. Re: Summary missing information by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Mercury's ROTATION is in resonant synchrony with it's ORBIT around the Sun, but that doesn't change the tidal forces themselves. It changes the change of tidal forces around the orbit, and therefore the work done on the planet by those forces. So tidal heating is minor.

      What heats Io (and other Jovian and Saturnian satellites) is the change of forces on on the planet between those from Jupiter (Saturn) and the forces from the other satellites.

      Tidal forces are generated by the steepness of the gravitational gradient across the orbit (which for a set planet is determined by the orbital radius), and the diameter of the satellite. The classical derivation requires you to calculate the orbital shape for a free-orbiting pebble at the sub-planetary point and the orbit for a free-orbiting pebble on the opposite side of the satellite. The two orbits would diverge. The stresses that this causes vary a small amount around a low eccentricity orbit, but for the Jovian (Saturnian) satellites, the change in proximity of the other satellites is far more significant than the simple Jovian tidal force.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    31. Re: Summary missing information by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the explanation.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  2. Come on, let's make it Buzzfeed-worthy by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists discover this one weird trick to remove a planet's atmosphere!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  3. The next question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why did Mars lose its magnetic field? Anything to do with its core solidifying?

    1. Re:The next question by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      It forgot to pay its maintenance fees, and field access was turned off at the server.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re: The next question by chill · · Score: 1

      Mars didn't lose its magnetic field, it just misplaced it. it is around the Solar System somewhere, so watch where you step.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:The next question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Martians designed a technology to attempt to weaponise earthquakes. It backfired, and stopped the rotation of the core.

    4. Re:The next question by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Mass too small, internal heat too low to generate a liquid iron core dynamo.

      As TFA says though, we don't have to worry about that since if we put a good atmosphere on it by terraforming, it would last several million years.

    5. Re:The next question by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      But what's the point in doing all the hard work to terraform Mars when there is nothing that can be done to stop this? The planet is dead unless we can increase the mass and magnetic fields, two things we don't have the science to do, nor will have in any remotely near timespan.

      Any work we'd do to terraform would be throwaway.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    6. Re:The next question by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      You're 100% correct. If we took the time and effort to put an Earth-like dense atmosphere it would be gradually stripped away... ...in about 100 million years.

      I think if we could manage to terraform Mars, I think we could probably do some even more interesting things with the terraformed planet in 100 million years.

    7. Re:The next question by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Ripley: "Van Luen, why don't you just check out lv426?"

      Van Luen: " 'Cause I don't have to, there have been people there for 20 years and they never complained about any hostile organism"

      Ripley: "What do you mean, what people?"

      Van Luen: "Terraformers, planet engineers, they go in set up these big atmosphere processors to make the air breathable, takes decades, it's what we call a Shake and Bake colony."

    8. Re:The next question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can teraform mars fast enough to make it worth the effort, then that would leave you with a livable planet that'll last a hundred million years or so. You don't think Humans (Assuming we escape self destruction, at times it feels like a coin flip on that.) can possibly get even better at teraforming or figure out how to make it more permanent during that time frame?

    9. Re:The next question by gringer · · Score: 1

      As TFA says though, we don't have to worry about that since if we put a good atmosphere on it by terraforming, it would last several million years.

      Great idea. Where are you going to get the carbon from to replace all the CO2 that has blown away?

      --
      Ask me about repetitive DNA
    10. Re: The next question by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Reminds me at "American Gods", where Odin is asked: "Where did you lose your eye?" and he answeres: "I did not lose my eye, I know exactly where it is."

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re:The next question by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      Great idea. Where are you going to get the carbon from to replace all the CO2 that has blown away?

      Send Al Gore there. I hear he produces enough CO2 for a small planet.

      --
      ---
    12. Re:The next question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dump coal there and burn it.

    13. Re:The next question by gringer · · Score: 1

      That's about a kiloton of coal every four months to just replace the current carbon that's being lost. To actually make a dent in the planet's carbon supply, it would be necessary to add more than that. Good luck finding the fuel to transport that, and the people who would be happy to see so much carbon leave Earth.

      --
      Ask me about repetitive DNA
    14. Re:The next question by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      if we put a good atmosphere on it by terraforming, it would last several million years.

      As I estimated here, delivering atmosphere at one Chelyabinsk (-size meteorite) an hour, it would take hundreds of thousands to a million or so years to deliver the atmosphere needed.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. Re: More disgusting Republican... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They hate children so they give NASA truckloads of cash instead of buying food.

  5. Re: More disgusting Republican... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They know NASA refuses to hire most non whites so they send a sore of money to them. Spew of money.

  6. Re: More disgusting Republican... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Republicans are not whole people.

  7. Re: More disgusting Republican... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather have a sore if honey.

  8. Re: More disgusting Republican... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Republicans are not whole people.

    Liberalism is a mental disorder.

  9. Re: More disgusting Republican... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh please. No on wins these Republican games. One side just loses more quickly.

  10. No sir. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    You and me both know it was aliens what did that to Mars.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:No sir. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Oh, and Joseph built the pyramids to use for grain storage.

      http://www.cbsnews.com/news/be...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:No sir. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You know, I'll bet there are numerous subject in which you don't know anything. Do you expect him to know how to fix his computers and setup a server too?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:No sir. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You know, I'll bet there are numerous subject in which you don't know anything.

      Which of course will not stop him from weighing in on the subject.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  11. What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere? by Sowelu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article says it would last for a while if we could, so...back of the envelope with probably horribly wrong numbers. Martian atmospheric density at the surface is 0.020 kg/m^3, human survival limit is something like 0.6 kg/m^3, so we need to add 29x current martian atmosphere to be long-term human survivable without a mask (for children and older, babies would still need higher pressure). NASA puts current atmospheric mass at 2.5e16kg, so we need to add 7.25e17kg. If we wanted to accomplish that task over a thousand years, or roughly 3.15e10 seconds, we would need to produce about 2.30e7kg of atmosphere every second for the duration. (At that speed, the loss rate of Mars's atmosphere due to solar wind is absolutely negligible.)

    Martian surface area is 1.44e14m^2, which means we'd need to pull ~5,000 kg of atmosphere out of every single square meter of the planet if we don't have some other source. I don't know what density or composition Martian rock is, but rock in general is about 2.5g/cm^3, or 2500kg/m^3. So you might need to dig several meters into the ground to get what you're after, and expend one hell of a lot of energy to crack the oxygen out of it, but it's not like you'd need to dig a whole mile down across the whole planet or anything.

  12. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by Sowelu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...new idea. If you already have the crazy tech necessary to do all that, just have your robots fabricate enclosed colony space instead. Mine, smelt, build roof. Yeah it's still ridiculous future technology, but if all you want is to make the place livable, it's a lot faster if you just make a bunch of buildings. Hell, in the amount of time it would take to crack all those atmospheric gases, you could have your crazy future robots just build an entire planet-covering roof for an enormous habitation space. It would take less work.

  13. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by Mspangler · · Score: 1

    Or we relocate Callisto, as in arrange a collision between Mars and Callisto. If that isn't enough energy to remelt Mar's core, then add Mercury. Or probably bang Mercury and Mars together first, then drop in Callisto so you don't lose the water that makes up Callisto. That might get you a habitable planet once the crust hardens up again.

  14. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by Cassini2 · · Score: 2

    In short, we would need to capture a small fraction of the mass of one of the gas giants, and transport it to Mars. It would be interesting to see a proposal on how that could be done.

  15. Forbes sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Javascript hell, no thanks.

  16. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Heat mars....perhaps covering it in dark dust at the polar caps, put some machines there to pump out CFCs...global warming will cause sublimation of dry ice into carbon dioxide, a green house gas...planet heats more, more is sublimated, etc...hopefully get a positive feedback cycle going...

    Maybe comet/asteroid impacts if needed....

    Reflectors positioned to focus sunlight...

    Nuclear detonations....

  17. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mass of the water ice frozen on/in the surface ~ 5 million cubic km of ice X 0.9 g/cm^3 ~ 10^17 kg

    Mass of dry ice (CO2) is about 1/3 that of water ice...so still on the order of 1.3 x 10^17 kg total

  18. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In short, we would need to capture a small fraction of the mass of one of the gas giants, and transport it to Mars. It would be interesting to see a proposal on how that could be done.

    A pipeline. In Spaaaaaaace!

  19. Two planets with water and air? by dryeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Submission claims that for the first 1/2 billion years there were 2 planets with water and air. What about Venus?
    Venus was also possibly inhabitable for the first part of its life, perhaps billions of years, until the Sun got warm enough to boil the Venusian oceans and created a runaway greenhouse affect.
    Same thing is predicted for the Earth as the Sun continues to heat up (due to having a higher percentage of helium with time and therefore higher density) perhaps in as soon as 500 million years.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  20. Re: More disgusting Republican... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inevitably some of that cash goes to the children of engineers and management... they can't hate kids too much.

  21. Nice pictures though by bentit · · Score: 1

    18+ year old theory: http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/p... I though I was losing my mind. The article, OK the summary, seems to imply no one ever thought of this.

  22. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by spauldo · · Score: 1

    I believe the normal science fiction solution is throwing comets at it. The comets can add water and various gases (although ammonia and methane probably aren't what you want for a liveable atmosphere) along with various organics.

    I'm not sure it would do us a lot of good, but it might give Mars a chance to develop life of its own, especially if seeded with simple life from Earth.

    Honestly, If we're going that far, I'd say a better target is Venus. Venus has no water. One of the theories for why Venus lacks a magnetic field is that its crust is too inflexible to support plate tectonics without water, which means the core doesn't cool fast enough to allow convection. Adding water might be all it takes to restart the magnetic field on Venus. The technology for all this is so far out there we may as well assume we have a way to get rid of a large chunk of Venus' atmosphere (maybe move it to Mars?), reducing the pressure down to levels where people could survive on the surface.

    I don't think any of this will actually happen, mind you. It's fun to think about, though.

    --
    Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
  23. So How Long Do We Have? by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    So what is the calculation of when the Earth's core will freeze over or is there enough radioactivity to last until the Sun finally expands and consumes Earth?

    1. Re:So How Long Do We Have? by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

      Until hell freezes over!

    2. Re:So How Long Do We Have? by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      Well, if you consider the longest a species of life on Earth has existed (which is about 200 million years I think) against time time frames being given for cores cooling and atmospheres being stripped... "how long do *we* have?" is the wrong question.

    3. Re:So How Long Do We Have? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      If you consider the AVERAGE lifespan of a species - we're already almost there.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    4. Re:So How Long Do We Have? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The answer doesn't matter. The steadily increasing heat output of the sun will render the Earth uninhabitable long before the red giant phase comes to pass.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  24. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, but it is more likely that we will have our hands full just surviving global warming here on Earth caused by the collective will of humanity.

  25. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by irrational_design · · Score: 1

    We just need Schwarzenegger to go to Mars and find some alien artifacts to make the atmosphere breathable in about 30 seconds.

  26. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Slashdot posts links to articles written by actual astronomers, instead of that corporate shill Siegel, who just cuts & pastes other people's work and asks people to send him money through Patreon (although he already gets paid by a private college and by Forbes)...?

  27. Re:Venus by Trevelyan · · Score: 1

    Venus should be a candidate for colonisation, it would probably be much cheaper and easier:

    Should We Colonize Venus Instead of Mars?

  28. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    Venus: too much atmosphere, too hot.
    Mars: not enough atmosphere, too cold.

    The answer is so simple even a hipster twat who paints himself blue and has a shaved head and a silly beard could work it out.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  29. Well add more mass then by fredness · · Score: 1

    Elon Musk suggested nuking Mars to warm it up.

    How about engineering controlled tiny asteroid collisions at the poles, replace the solar wind matter being stripped off.

  30. Incorrect Calculation of Necessary Mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humans need atleast 33.7 KiloPascal of pressure. On Mars that's 1.311 x 10^18 Kg ( http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%2833.7+KPa+*+%28Mars+Surface+Area%29%29+%2F+%28Mars+Gravity%29 ). So your calculations are a factor of 1.896 off (55/29). I'm glad you bothered to do basic math, most on slashdot can't seem to even manage that.

    I've sent a couple of proposals to actually achieve such a project, but the end is still the same. A livable Mars will need to have boots on ground that can do WORK. With current space suit ( inflexible, heavy, pressurized ballon) designs very little work can be done. So we either make better space suits and import humans, import bombs to explode and sublimate deposits of gasses( Olivine, Dry Ice, etc) , import robots to automate what humans would be doing, or import asteroids with alot of oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide to create a atmosphere after impact.

    Any one of these will require focus and unrelenting leadership to accomplish. Let's hope there is a fifth dimensional being because none of this will happen with current leadership.

    1. Re:Incorrect Calculation of Necessary Mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Addendum.
      The rate of atmospheric loss is ~ 6,084,072 Kilograms / Mars Year (1 second *60*60*24.60*687* 100 grams /second). That's assuming no solar storms, which is highly unlikely. There is obviously mass being sublimated/ vaporized into the atmosphere as well( not sure of the exact rate, but i predict it to be around 10-30 grams/second.)

      So any mass generated or imported will be have to be atleast 1x10^7 Kg/year to have a positive effect. Maybe we should just wait for those ancient aliens to come back.....

    2. Re:Incorrect Calculation of Necessary Mass by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "Let's hope there is a fifth dimensional being because none of this will happen with current leadership."

      Of course. It would take little people who are good at math, fearless about engineering and have a track record of long-term thinking. Oh, wait -

  31. Incorrect Calculation of Necessary Mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humans need atleast 33.7 KiloPascal of pressure. On Mars that's 1.311 x 10^18 Kg ( http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%2833.7+KPa+*+%28Mars+Surface+Area%29%29+%2F+%28Mars+Gravity%29 ). So your calculations are a factor of 1.896 off (55/29). I'm glad you bothered to do basic math, most on slashdot can't seem to even manage that.

    I've sent a couple of proposals to actually achieve such a project, but the end is still the same. A livable Mars will need to have boots on ground that can do WORK. With current space suit ( inflexible, heavy, pressurized ballon) designs very little work can be done. So we either make better space suits and import humans, import bombs to explode and sublimate deposits of gasses( Olivine, Dry Ice, etc) , import robots to automate what humans would be doing, or import asteroids with alot of oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide to create a atmosphere after impact.

    Any one of these will require focus and unrelenting leadership to accomplish. Let's hope there is a fifth dimensional being because none of this will happen with current leadership.

    Reply to This

  32. Re:Venus by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    Trouble is getting there in the first place won't be.
    It is far more difficult (and costs a LOT more energy) to send a rocket to the inner planets than to an outer planet. The reasons are a bit complicated for a slashdot post (it's about how much orbital velocity you need around the sun in a smaller orbit and then to get into planetary orbit you have to slow down by a lot more).

    It's possible and we've sent probes to venus but they used a lot more fuel than the same size probe would need to Mars despite Mars being further away (actual distance is not the biggest concern with orbital mechanics). For something with enough mass to contain humans - that difference goes up at a near exponential rate.
    Now there is probably a point where the difference in terraforming costs will outweigh the difference in travel cost. If you're going whole-hog "build a colony" it may well be true - but we're a while away from that yet, and for early stage experiments Mars is almost certainly the cheaper option.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  33. Re: What would it take to replace Mars's atmospher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not in my neighborhood!!!!

  34. Re: More disgusting Republican... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    ...Which the Democrat kids can then mug them for. So the same income redistribution takes place with either party.

  35. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    "...it's a lot faster if you just make a bunch of buildings. "

    Which could be partly earth-sheltered to reduce radiation.

  36. Re:Venus by kwiecmmm · · Score: 1

    (They mention this in the video but it still seems important to state) Venus is much more inhabitable than Mars is. The biggest issue at the moment is the fact that Venus's surface temperature is above 450 C. We currently know how to make a planet warmer over time, but we don't know how to make a planet that much cooler for multiple reasons. Partially because of the fact that with a sulfuric atmosphere and that temperature it becomes very difficult to even get any machines there for colonization.

    Also no visible light reaches the surface due to its thick atmosphere. And one final note about Venus, its rotation is so slow it takes 243 days for it to complete one rotation. Therefore a year on Venus is shorter than a day on Venus.

    In other words it would take a lot better technology to colonize Venus that it would take to colonize Mars. We could begin on Mars mostly with current technology, a few things would probably need to be improved first, but that could be done in the next decade or so.

    But in order to build a colony on Venus we would need to invent the technology to keep the colony off of the surface. And this technology is not easy to test here on earth, because we would need to duplicate Venus conditions and NASA likes to test the crap out of its technology before sending it. While I understand that it is a shorter trip, and it has better gravity. I don't think it would be easier or cheaper at this time.

    In the long run a colony should definitely be looked at on Venus, partially because it could teach humans how to terraform planets which would definitely be helpful in the long run. But when we talk about colonizing other planets Mars makes the most since at this time with current technology.

  37. Re:Venus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Venus could be the testbed on technologies for global cooling, since we're going need that sooner than later...

  38. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy. Quaid start the reactor...

  39. My next 3 posts show what you "know" lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I am going to have a FIELD DAY on you, "signature boy"... lol (you did it to yourself).

    APK

    P.S.=> Want to play games with me behind my back punk (since I can't see signatures)? Fine... I can too - check these out, only 2 days worth of my efforts to put your ass away:

    http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

    https://www.google.com/search?...

    They'll only get more of results of those efforts of mine as I keep it up, & you keep up your 'signatures' punk + shooting your DIMWIT NO MIND KNOW NEARLY ZERO limited menial level of computing know how posts... lol!

    (Funniest part is, your big mouth does it brain damage boy, keep posting & shooting off your piehole - I can demonstrate malicious intent out of YOU easily, as I've bookmarked every SINGLE time you've given me guff)... apk

    1. Re:My next 3 posts show what you "know" lol by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      There is no behind your back, punk, you could create an account and see the signature just like everyone else. But, since you seem to be incapible of doing that, here is the signature:

      --
      APK is a Troll, please ignore him. If he had anything to say, he'd have an account.

      Also, why would I care if your crap hits Google? Do you think it matters how much insane shit posting show up? You are the one that is looking bad, not me, so it doesn't bother me one iota.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:My next 3 posts show what you "know" lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His posts I see under yours expose you're a blunderer that trolled him and your computing knowledge is poor. His posts on hosts files also aren't being down modded constantly anymore. I think he exhausted you of all of your modpoints or those of your sock puppets as he alluded to in his posts. We've all seen it too. Hundreds of modpoints exhausted in trying to hide his posts this week that served in exposing your trolling him and errors you've made on simple computing topics. Strange coincidence? I think not. I suspect you're the one doing all the down moderation of apk's posts yourself or by sock puppetry this past year forcing him to repost as he does to make his posts visible again which you can no longer stop as you have no more modpoints having spent them all to attempt to defend yourself Coren.

    3. Re:My next 3 posts show what you "know" lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren your tech errors apk points out, you making a fake account to harass apk with called "apk got an account" http://slashdot.org/~apk+got+a... and your lunatic rants in reaction to being caught doing all that prove you're a childish fool. Grow up. Your constant down moderations by sockpuppet alter egos of yours isn't working either. He has you beaten at every turn. Give up.

  40. Coren22 proven a LYING punk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "APK doesn't think that DNS servers are worth running and seems to believe that somehow Microsoft Active Directory can run without DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @12:58PM (#50811615)

    Where'd I say AD will run minus DNS Coren22? I've said AD = internal network DNS dependent as far back as 2007 http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

    (Searching this in BOLD "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers!" referring to OpenDNS suggestions for those using AD stupid in the POSTS BEFORE IT in my security guides for users (geared to stand alone single machines no less), & right there on that page proves it stupid - so even if you posted as myself someplace here on /. "impersonating me", I have your ass NOW, shithead!)

    I've also stated MANY TIMES I use remote DNS in OpenDNS @ home (but not @ work on AD networks + exchange/outlook: Free OpenDNS model doesn't work with AD dependent Exchange + Outlook specifically you lying little imbecile).

    I also don't hardcode in "every site there is under the sun" is why, so I have to use DNS, but OpenDNS & rarely.

    I also RARELY MISS A LOOKUP since I put where I spend a good 95++% of my time online in my favorite sites into hosts @ the TOP of hosts for utmost LOCAL FASTER RESOLUTION SPEEDS and more reliability vs. Open DNS (not OpenDNS) resolvers being abused, Kaminsky redirect poisoned DNS servers (of which 99.999% of ISP DNS are not proofed against to this very day even though a patch exists which OpenDNS uses), rogue DNS servers, and yes ROUTERS with bushwhacked by malware DNS settings (happening a LOT lately).

    Hardcodes in hosts are faster than remote DNS, waste less resources than local dns in power, cpu cycles, RAM, & other I/O by FAR considering ALL THE PARTS of such a setup in programs, data, I/O, & power (especially if setup as a separate machine).

    APK

    P.S.=> You're a disgusting liar... apk

  41. Coren22 "security guru" wannabe fails security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU say "hosts=bad" (but they add security, speed, & reliability) & bitch on admin privelege to UPDATE vs. threats:

    "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    Hypocrite - You use admin priv admitting it

    &

    How else can I programmatically update hosts minus it in Windows?

    ---

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    You FINALLY later admit there's no other way!

    FACT:

    Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware (best one) DEMANDS you use admin privelege (you saying it's "bad" too?) it can't do its job fully otherwise, like many security tools do!

    ---

    Aryeh Goretsky NOD32/ESET says hosts = good security-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Oliver Day (Symantec) does-> http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts hosts & recommends my APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit-> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    * HOW MANY SECURITY PROS DO I NEED TO KNOCK THE CHOCOLATE OUTTA YOU?

    ---

    Those security pros INCLUDE me: I work w/ guys from malwarebytes' hpHosts on a regular basis!

    I've professionally worked for decades as a combined domain-wide network admin & software engineer since 1994 (Even showing you HOW to migrate a hosts across an enterprise-> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )

    I've also been securing computers + WRITING GUIDES using CIS Tool (who took fixes from me http://slashdot.org/comments.p... - bonus) http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

    You told me you learn from guides?

    I write good ones that MILLIONS USE & was PAID FOR IT http://pcpitstop.com/news/winn...

    + WARES TO PROTECT USERS that are endorsed & hosted by security pros -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    You did all that? No!

    (& that's ONLY a SMALL part of what I could put out)

    APK

    P.S.=> You're all TALK -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & a "ne'er-do-well" in security... apk

  42. Coren22's desperation, lies, & libel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    False positive: I've wrote 'em long ago, no response vs. 60++ REPUTABLE sources (not nobodies) below that fries you Coren22!

    Is that your fake site for more lies Coren22?

    Lying about me LIKE YOU DID HERE punk -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ??

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    More "SALT IN YOUR WOUNDS" -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    APK

    P.S.=> /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

  43. Coren22 "signature boy" & menial dolt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject - OR didn't you say:

    "Maybe I should change my signature again just to rile him up some more." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015 @10:07AM (#50855451) FROM http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    behind my back (I can't see sigs) & KGIII noted it:

    "In an earlier thread, I saw that APK quoted your signature" - by KGIII (973947) on Monday November 02, 2015 @10:22PM (#50852845) FROM http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Which I SHUT DOWN due to your lies about me on AD + DNS (GPO too from my security guides I see you've read, that are geared to single stand alone machines NOT networked ones but I advise vs. using external DNS with AD there too, here) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ---

    * Want to keep talking about me behind my back punk?

    APK

    P.S.=> It's YOUR FUNERAL & you're BURYING YOURSELF... my other posts here prove that much easily (as well as the fact you have a MENIAL LEVEL of understanding in computing moron)... apk

  44. Coren22's desperation, lies, & libel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    False positive: I've wrote 'em long ago, no response vs. 60++ REPUTABLE sources (not nobodies) below that fries you Coren22!

    Is that your fake site for more lies Coren22?

    Lying about me LIKE YOU DID HERE punk -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ??

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    More "SALT IN YOUR WOUNDS" -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    APK

    P.S.=> /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

  45. LMAO - having trouble "keeping your word"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't have time for the Troll APK, and refuse to respond anymore to a post signed APK" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015 @04:27PM (#50858983)

    Yes - that quote PROVES IT FOR ME & I am doing a "Cardinal Richelieu" on YOU signature boy... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> See, I make 1 mistake about "your kind": I assume others have honor & pride - your kind? DOESN'T - which is WHY YOU HIDE BEHIND WEASEL FAKE NAMES ONLINE & many others feel the same of your kind (famous people in computing - you have NO INTEGRITY): You're pond scum that likes to dish it out UNDER "PHANTASY LAND NAMES" but when it's done to you, you can't handle it in return... you're PROVING THIS FOR ME as your "facade" crumbles you EASILY MANIPULATED PROJECTING mentally retard aspergers DOLT, lol... I love it! apk

  46. Re:Venus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The delta-v for a good transfer to Mars is about 3.6 km/s, and 3.5 km/s to Venus. It isn't harder to get to, and you can find many planetary scientists a bit jaded about how Mars gets a lot more attention.

  47. Re: Venus by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    But getting to low orbit for landing Mars needs 2.1 km/s while venus needs 3.3 km/s.

    You looked at the transfer alone but a trip is more than one burn. You have to add them all up.

    One thing I havent factored in is the increased possibility of aerobreaking around venus. Not sure how that changes the final scores.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  48. What is "incapible" signature boy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Is that how you brain damaged INCAPABLE punks spell??

    LMAO!

    * See? I can play troll "spelling nazi" too - doing trolling like you have to me nigh endlessly and I fry you for it using YOUR OWN WORDS Cardinal Richelieu style since you're an easily tracked for RETROLLING troll stupid enough to maintain a registered 'luser' script trackable 'account' here stupid.

    MAN, are you dumb! NOW, that *may* not be your fault... it's your damaged aspergers brain working against you. Address my other posts that show your fuckups Coren22... where'd you do that? SHOW US... do it now, I will destroy you AGAIN publicly for your reprehensible WORM tactics and stupidity in computing, dolt.

    APK

    P.S.=> Come on boy - keep posting: I can play "troll games" too GIVING YOU A DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE in return which you can't handle (as your facade of civility crumbles as I work you letting YOUR OWN WORDS do the work for me retard aspergers boy that can't spell)

    &

    I will outsmart, out think, and OUTPLAY you every single time PUNK: Nothing can stop me, especially vs. a libelous little DO NOTHING PUNK like you!

    You did this to yourself - every time which you're proving for me now especially... learn a lesson from it - You & yours trolls all with "phantasy land" fake names online? Bah, the REAL punks with NO INTEGRITY that pull shit because they never had their asses beat (real men do NOT do that, they know the price you little weasel - but NOW? Now, I think you're FINALLY "getting it")

    You sow the wind? NOW REAP THE WHIRLWIND of your own words fucking you up for f'ing with me like a gossipy old bitch would (which is what you evidence yourself to be in 'signatures' & lies about me that I crush & you with it - can't hide them, I just override it & won't allow it - no "last word" for you PUNK - I am your superior on ANY LEVEL and you know it - your reactions are only helping prove it all the more, lol)... apk

  49. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by solartear · · Score: 1

    Anti-Mars people seem to miss that point. If you are on Mars surface, Mars is shielding you from half the constant radiation. Create buildings with a thick roof on top and big windows on the side, like most apartment and office buildings, and you are about as protected as on Earth.

  50. Re:Venus by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Venus is actually a fairly interesting prospect for colonization. You obviously don't go down to the surface with its lead-melting temperatures. However, about 50km from the surface you have temperatures a bit above freezing, the atmospheric pressure of roughly one atmosphere, and gravity that's very near Earth's. It's about the most earth-like place in the solar system that's not on Earth itself. The atmosphere is mostly CO2, which is a dense gas, so a balloon filled with breathable air would float. You have plenty of solar radiation during the day, the air contains nitrogen and trace amounts of water, and the magnetic field and dense atmosphere gives you some protection from the sun's radiation. On the downside though, the wind speed is hundreds of miles per hour, the days are really long, and if your balloon sinks you're pretty much a goner.

  51. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Find a planet between them that has just the right amount of atmosphere and it neither too hot or cold?

  52. Re:What would it take to replace Mars's atmosphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find a planet between them that has just the right amount of atmosphere and it neither too hot or cold?

    The problem with that one: there were bears sleeping on it and eating my porridge.

  53. Re:Venus by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Without following the clickbait, there's a good chance that you're correct.

    But what's the point about the cost of sending people there? Apart from the first few colonists - a few thousand - they'll breed their own inhabitants. why would they want poor foreign immigrants from a polluted or nearly uninhabitable planet like Earth will be in the thousands of years that the project would take.

    Or ... were people thinking of dreams about the future being a substitute for dealing with current problems?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  54. Ah, that's it "signature boy" - "ReAcT", lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject? Hahahahahaha, says it all for me... keep running signature boy (you did it to yourself & I am scorching you for it)

    * YOUR "ReAcTiOn" shows it all - you DO care, lmao! How fucking STUPID could you be? Keep projecting & posting - you brought it on yourself!

    APK

    P.S.=> What's the matter PUSSY? Can't take what you dish out?? Don't like it done to YOU in return??? You started it, I am merely FINISHING IT, & there's nothing a menial wannabe in computing like YOU CAN DO to stop it (no abused downmod points can stop me & lol, I get you & yours (sockpuppets or fellow trolls I've crushed making them eat their words JUST LIKE YOU in my other posts here have to) run out of effete 'bullets' to do it with - I never do, as I know more than you do and how to do it fast, & no TOR like you STUPIDLY accused me of dimwit, lol).

    Call me punk? You're the fucking BRAIN DAMAGED "aspergers" RETARD, not I - I just show others what a PUNK YOU ARE, with your 'signatures' about me (total lies I blew away WITH YOUR OWN WORDS NO LESS you have to "eat", R O T F L M A O) ... apk

  55. Coren22 gets crushed (& he ran) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Says it all & this link, dismantling him point-by-"so-called 'point'" of his publicly http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (Coren22, I tried to give you a chance, 3x no less - you're a fool: You mistake mercy for weakness, like cretin brutes in the streets do... you paid the price!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I notice you stopped responding there - "Gosh, golly gee - why's that?" (not) - but I expect you'll TRY some more b.s. as that's all "your kind" (trolls) understand - crap like downmodding my posts or ac troll me!

    (Which you & your sockpuppets OR fellow trolls have here already NOW TELLING OTHERS TO TROLL ME BY UNIDENTIFIABLE AC POSTS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I've torn you ALL up 1 by 1 every time as I have yourself above... you did this, to yourself "signature boy")... apk