Slashdot Mirror
Interactive Fiction Competition Enters Its Third Decade (thenewstack.io)
An anonymous reader writes: Voting is concluding this week for the 21st Annual Interactive Fiction Competition. All the games are available free online, and on November 15th the contest's organizers will announce the game that's received the highest average ratings. "This year's contestants entered 55 original text adventures – a new record," notes one technology blog, which argues that the annual competition provides a link to the history of both gaming and computers. New game-creating tools have "democratized" the field, and the contest may also ultimately lead game creators to explore even more forms of digital media.
Still hard to match the good, well-written and imaginative text games. They play on all sorts of platforms, demand very little resources, and often provide great entertainment and challenge. Some of them are really thought-provoking.
Also keep in mind that most of them are free (or very inexpensive) and can be produced by a single talented person. The quality of tools has steadily improved (look at Inform 7, for instance). You don't have to be a mega-studio to produce a quality text game.
So that's what they're calling the campaign Twitter feeds these days...
The 18th Annual Halloween Ghost Story Contest on Saugus.net was just held too and had a winning interactive fiction entry. It's also been accepting horror interactive fiction entries for years.
Are multi-user interactive fiction works completely ignored in this contest or can't they enter?
I know the writing at telnet://discworld.starturtle.net often had me in stitches back in the day, wonder if they're still up.
Still hard to match the good, well-written and imaginative text games.
I think the lack of visual detail is what makes these games good.
I was surprised that the radio play version of "Hitchhiker's Guide" was so much better than the TV series, and surmised that it was because the radio play left the visuals to the imagination of the listener. I read an analysis of the "Twilight" vampire novels which noted that the novel gives very little detail about the narrator (Bella, in first-person), while other characters are described in detail. That meant that any teen reader could imagine herself as Bella having those experiences - there's no detail that would contradict the reader from making that association.
(For comparison, consider the Thomas Covenant series, where the main character has leprosy and a defeatist attitude. Admittedly different, but also very hard to identify with.)
I think the adventure games make good use of that. Instead of giving a complete picture of a house, as might be shown in a modern high-end video game, they have a few words of house description, and the reader is left to fill in the details.
It also helps if the words can lead the viewer to the conclusion intended by the writer. For example, the text adventure can say "the creepy-looking house" while the video game has to supply an artistic rendition of a house that might or might not look creepy. And if the viewer doesn't understand that the house looks creepy, there's no recourse in the video game.
H.P. Lovecraft once said that the biggest fear is the fear of the unknown. The underlying reason might be that *anything* is more intense given scant information, because with no contradictory detail your mind is free to fill in the gaps with whatever is most intense.
Wikipedia dates CYOAs to 1976, but yes.
I played "Five Minutes to Burn" for a while, and reminded me of everything I don't like about interactive fiction. Commands that don't quite work right, needing to build up a map in your head based entirely on "N, S, E, W," (easier to draw the map on paper, for bigger worlds), and lots of text that hides important points (seriously, who needs to look at a magnet to figure out how to start a fire?)
"Cape" was a more intuitive presentation, where your options are always obvious. The options were good enough that I made it through to the end of one story. I don't think your choices make much difference to where you end up though, it's mostly a click-through story. Worth a read.
"Laid off from a Synesthesia Factory" has an interesting premise, but has too many words, and the words don't always make sense. For example, this sentence: "the kitchen is like all kitchens are; the shelves, you are certain, were literally cubicles once." A kitchen with cubicle shelves is not like all kitchens are. A little buggy because the "help" command completely ruins everything. Maybe that's on purpose. It's never clear if a particular command had effect or not.
"Midnight Swordfight." Interesting concept. It is helpful because it tells you what commands can be used at any given point. Unhelpful because not only can you travel through time in the forward and backward direction, also clockwise and counter-clockwise. I didn't want to break out paper to draw a map, so I gave up.
Not sure what other of the games might be good.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
"The Duel" is good too. You can use the browser back-button to fix bad options (and solve the puzzle without going through so many redundant options).
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
Inform 7 is needed because, as it turns out, real programmers (/raise hand) write shitty IF. So now actual writers are giving it a go, and are doing considerably better, IMHO.
Why don't you go back to playing GTA or something suitable for you.