Slashdot Mirror


The Internet Falls For Rumblr, a Fake "Tinder For Fighting" App

HughPickens.com writes: Caitlin Dewey writes at the Washington Post that Rumblr, a "Tinder for fighting," promises to bring fight club straight to your smartphone that lets users schedule consensual, recreational fights with local strangers for free. "Rumblr is an app for recreational fighters to find, meet and fight other brawl enthusiasts nearby," according the app's website. It encourages users to insult their matched opponents with this pro-tip: "tell your match what you don't like about their picture." Reported by the likes of Venture Beat, Business Insider, New York magazine, and the New York Daily News, there's only one problem: There's no way that the app is real. In fact, it looks far more likely that we are being trolled by a couple of precocious teenagers. Let's start with the app's most obvious problem: its questionable legality. If you're "throwing down" and seriously injure your opponent — or, God forbid, he dies — you cannot claim self-defense and you could be charged with crimes ranging from misdemeanor assault to homicide. If Rumblr's creators are found to have encouraged or aided an assault, they could be guilty of criminal facilitation in the fourth degree — a class A misdemeanor. They could certainly be sued in civil court by injured users or their families. "Our bet? Rumblr is a marketing stunt, a prank or (best case!) an unsubtle parody," concludes Dewy. "Part of me is scared it will turn out to be real, of course. Not for my sake, but for humanity's."

135 comments

  1. Well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apparently the Internet is nothing more than a handful of shitty old media rags.

    Who knew.

  2. Man Up by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

    "Part of me is scared it will turn out to be real, of course. Not for my sake, but for humanity's."

    Part of me is scared this person is serious.

    1. Re: Man Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      File under "doesn't get it" and let him get back to his IKEA catalog.

  3. This stuff is awesome by AbRASiON · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sometimes a good harmless troll is some good fun, shakes people up into actually thinking before they damn well read something.

    Brings new meaning to the term "hey, hit me up on rumblr" I suppose too.

    1. Re:This stuff is awesome by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Considering the amount of garbage that gets posted without fact(see this) checking at all, then doubles down on the stuff that is real(see peeple), but then tell you it's okay and really won't hurt you should tell folks that something is really, really, really, screwed up in the media.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  4. Make love not war by mi · · Score: 5, Funny

    promises to bring fight club straight to your smartphone that lets users schedule consensual, recreational fights with local strangers for free

    Obviously a fake — if one is already allowing a total stranger into one's comfort zone with all the accompanying risks, exposing himself to the stranger's skin and — quite possible during a fight — bodily fluids, why not have sex instead of kicking each other's teeth out?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re: Make love not war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because there's already an app for that?

    2. Re:Make love not war by Tough+Love · · Score: 5, Funny

      why not have sex instead of kicking each other's teeth out

      You might not be any good at sex.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re:Make love not war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For fighting with the "SJW" types the insults would contain phrases like: "Your tits are so sweet and suckable!", "I can't get my eyes of your lovely ass!" The confrontation would be mutually enjoyable, angry sex at the arranged place, a real rumblr indeed.

    4. Re:Make love not war by karolgajewski · · Score: 1

      If you're not kicking teeth out, you're doing it wrong.

      --
      - .k. -
    5. Re:Make love not war by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      , why not have sex instead of kicking each other's teeth out?

      because he might be really ugly.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    6. Re: Make love not war by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      if the sex app is like fight club, users will have to hang around bar parking lots, sexing themselves alone while imagining something intense, with random people watching, until eventually someone asks to join.

    7. Re:Make love not war by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Because a it's far more attractive prospect to kick the teeth out of your asshole boss than it is to have sex with him.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    8. Re: Make love not war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      make install #not war

    9. Re:Make love not war by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, I for my part prefer a petit female for sex over a 300 or more poinds 'gorilla' any time (regardles of gender, erm or sex? of that gorilla)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re:Make love not war by mi · · Score: 1

      I denounce you, kamrade, for being sexist and for body-shaming people you don't even know. So shallow... Your derogatory use of the term "gorilla" smacks of anthropocentrism and specieism so disgusting, I can't go to work now and will require days of therapy and counselling to deal with the pain you caused me. Fuck you — you should not be able to sleep at night!

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    11. Re:Make love not war by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, if under that 300 pounds gorilla costume is a petit lady, I'd like to unwrap her ... regardless of race ;) but I admit, I'm a sexist, I only love girls and find boys not attractive/arousing at all ;)
      Ha, Helloween ... I'm so glad that here only a minority is fslling for that nonsense, but we have carnivalls ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re: Make love not war by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      You forgot to start out with SPOILER ALERT

      (you insensitive clod)

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  5. If it's a hoax by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

    Let's not report on it and give it free marketing. There's no danger to not spreading this: very few people are going to look for the app, and sensible people are going to distrust an app that encourages fighting or any other illegal activity. Let it drop, and take the wind out of sails.

    1. Re:If it's a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're no fun. It's a good troll, they got respectable publications to pick up the story, so props to the originators, and why not big it up? Those of us who actually have a sense of humour will get a laugh out of it, nobody got hurt, so I don't see why we should "take the wind out of sails".

      Of course now that the obvious questions are being asked, it will shortly become clear that it's not real (assuming it is a hoax of course), and it will pretty much have run its course anyway.

    2. Re:If it's a hoax by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Let's not report on it and give it free marketing. There's no danger to not spreading this: very few people are going to look for the app, and sensible people are going to distrust an app that encourages fighting or any other illegal activity. Let it drop, and take the wind out of sails.

      Why? It's the funniest thing I've seen all day..

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    3. Re:If it's a hoax by thecity · · Score: 1

      Fighting is not an illegal activity. Anyone remember that video Seattle super hero Phoenix Jones announcing WA state is a mutual combat state while the police stood by and watched him kick that dude's ass that challenged him to a fight?

    4. Re:If it's a hoax by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      and sensible people are going to distrust an app that encourages fighting

      In a world of prime time fighting events broadcast on TVs around the world what on earth made you think that sentence made any sense?

  6. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fight club isn't supposed to be legal.
    So it's a felony. So what?

    It's probably real.

    1. Re:So? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I think, in my state, they drop the charges if there's no complaint filed. So, the cops may arrest you (unlikely) but if it was mutual they're probably not going to do anything about it. Domestic violence is a different charge and doesn't require the victim to even testify.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  7. Most obvious problem: its questionable legality? by khchung · · Score: 1

    Let's start with the app's most obvious problem: its questionable legality.

    Is that a problem? Seems like a secret winning recipe for Uber (for a while, at least).

    --
    Oliver.
  8. Humanity has fought for millions of years by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Part of me is scared it will turn out to be real, of course. Not for my sake, but for humanity's."

    Dewy, who wrote the above milquetoast nonsense, may find the fighting traditions of 18th- and 19th-century German students , as described, for example, in Mark Twain's "Tramp Abroad", most illuminating...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Humanity has fought for millions of years by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea if done correctly. If you put in some rules so that the risk of maiming or injury goes down (no weapons, no below the belt, stopping when the other person says "STOP!!", etc.) then you get boxing/mma/wrestling, and that's perfectly legal. The problem is, you're always going to have the moron who shows up drunk, smashes the other guy's head in with a bottle, and gets the entire thing banned. It wouldn't even take a day. In the mean time, you can always join a legal martial arts or boxing class.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    2. Re:Humanity has fought for millions of years by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      So you would prefer a humanity where it is the norm to hack each other with swords to the point of serious injury and even death. Well I have news for you sunshine: there's a lot of people out there who are of a slightly less Hobbesian bent.

      And modded +5 Insightful no less. By the same sort of Internet Tough Guys probably.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    3. Re:Humanity has fought for millions of years by mi · · Score: 1

      So you would prefer a humanity where it is the norm to hack each other with swords to the point of serious injury and even death

      Norm? Did I say, it ought to be a norm, you lying piece of shit? Had you read the book I referred to — or the Wikipedia article I linked to — you would've known, that it was not a norm even in Twain's times: students engaging in this sort of thing were a minority, however sizeable.

      Internet Tough Guys

      Meanwhile, the Internet Sissies let their aggressions out by hacking at strawmen, I see...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re:Humanity has fought for millions of years by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Norm? No. Most people are cowards, at heart. I do think it should be legal, however. Yes, I think two individuals should have the right to self-determination. I think they should be of sound mind when making that choice. Hell, I'm pretty sure it's not even prosecuted in my state unless you kill someone.

      I'd enjoy an application like this, not to fight (I'm too old for that, these days). I'd love to go watch. Two meatsticks kicking the shit out of each other is great entertainment.

      I do have multiple A&B charges on my record and one conviction and two losses in civil court. I've been the meatstick kicking the shit out of someone before. Sometimes, it was not consensual in some sense but the State allowed a defense of a third party's defense by statute. The criminal aspect, in the most interesting event, was when he was no longer putting up a defense and I sat on his chest while slapping him over and over again saying, "So you like to hit women? How do you like being my bitch?" *sighs* I spent a night in jail and lost in civil court. It gets worse but that's too long to type out here.

      That should not be legal. In the above, I violated the law and was properly punished for it - including a rather large financial settlement that involved him and another party. However, if I'd not gone that far - I'd have been perfectly legal. I do think that I should be allowed to consent to a fight. I'd even go so far as to say that I should be allowed to consent to a fight involving weapons.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Humanity has fought for millions of years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Mensur" isn't a thing of the 18th- and 19th-century - it's still being practised by many of the old Student organizations.

    6. Re:Humanity has fought for millions of years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you would prefer a humanity where it is the norm to hack each other with swords to the point of serious injury and even death.

      That would be the humanity that currently exists, so yes, I prefer the reality to some non-existent fantasy.

      I have at least half a dozen sword scars. All over the world people are being hacked to death every day. In Africa and Asia, machetes are popular.

      Well I have news for you sunshine: there's a lot of people out there who are of a slightly less Hobbesian bent.

      I guess if you're living the ivory tower life, you can ignore all the people scrabbling to survive that actually provide your gadgets and candy, and call your ignorance philosophy.

    7. Re:Humanity has fought for millions of years by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Hah. Dog-whistling, and not even the courage to come right out, instead weaselling "I didn't say that".

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    8. Re:Humanity has fought for millions of years by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Cowards? Most of us don't want to get into any serious danger of being killed without a darn good reason, and the opportunity to kill another guy isn't really attractive. Whether we're brave or cowardly is completely beside the point.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  9. lol internets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I saw it, I sort of chuckled internally and thought "sure, why not?" It's sad when something like this can seem so plausible that you don't get riled up over it. But then I've been going to 4chan for years; that kind of numbs you to the crazy stuff that ends up on the internet.

    1. Re:lol internets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sheer volume of stupid that I see on any given day makes this completely plausible. Beyond that, the other horrible idea that is actually a thing is, http://forthepeeple.com/

  10. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by Wycliffe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, I'm confused about this one. Selling drugs or sex isn't legal either but that doesn't mean that a website that does it is fake.
    Just because it is illegal to facilitate an exchange doesn't mean that someone isn't going to create a website that tries.
    Sure, it might get taken down or they might open themself up to lawsuits but that doesn't change whether or not it can exists.

    On another note, how exactly is a mutual fight illegal? There are plenty of places where boxing, cage fighting, etc... happens.

  11. legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's start with the app's most obvious problem: its questionable legality. If you're "throwing down" and seriously injure your opponent â" or, God forbid, he dies â" you cannot claim self-defense and you could be charged with crimes ranging from misdemeanor assault to homicide.

    Just have the fighters sign assumption of risk waivers to get around that particular legal problem. The biggest reason that street fighting is illegal is because of the gambling, not to protect the fighters from themselves. That's why Fight Club was so unbelievable, none of the guys were betting on the fights! It's not even like there was a rule against it. The rest of the movie was completely plausible, though it could have been improved with a trained orangutan.

    1. Re:legality by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      What street fighting against orangutans? I would watch this.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    2. Re:legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhhh! Don't say the M-word! "OOOOOOOOOK!"

  12. WWF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it all the time. Legal it certainly is. Cage matches? All the time. Legal it certainly is. If you want illegal, go 81 in an 80. Illegal it certainly is.

    I wrest this case.

    1. Re:WWF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking moron.

  13. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    I could have sworn the "secret recipe for Uber" was that all those wonderfully regulated cab services actually suck and many have poor customer service: http://www.wbur.org/2011/02/15...

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  14. Legal issues are no guarantee of a hoax by quantaman · · Score: 1

    I'd be entirely unsurprised if this was completely real, that the authors are just ignoring the legal risks and the investors are either exaggerated (a ploy to draw real investors) or figure the inventors have a non-trivial chance to either dodge legal liability or transform the app into something legal.

    If you couldn't find investors just because something was a terrible idea then we wouldn't have Twitter.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  15. Is there a new GTA due soon? by BlacKSacrificE · · Score: 2

    Because this would be a perfect minigame for it.

    --
    [Sorry, this signature is unavailable in your country/region]
    1. Re:Is there a new GTA due soon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Niko, it's your cousin! Fight Club & chill?"

  16. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    In many countries, you simply cannot consent to serious injury -- at all, ever.

    Things like boxing (and hockey) wind up being "prize fights", are under heavy regulation, and are supposedly set up with enough safety procedures to avoid serious injury, with exceptions being considered errors, and dealt with accordingly.

    Cool, I guess there's one exception: you can consent to organ donation!

  17. This is all well and good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But how can we use Rumblr to encourage more women into STEM fields?

    1. Re:This is all well and good by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      But how can we use Rumblr to encourage more women into STEM fields?

      Jell-O wrestling?

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  18. Re: Most obvious problem: its questionable legalit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the US at least mutual fighting is no where near legal. The fights in rings are sanctioned and approved of by a judge because they have shown that it is their business and they have proven that they have appropriate insurance policies for the fighters.

  19. Why Would You Be Against This by cosm · · Score: 1

    If two consenting individuals choose to fight each other willingly, why is that a problem? What if it was part of X minority group culture? Would SJW culture then accept it?

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Why Would You Be Against This by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      If two consenting individuals love each other and want to get married we're supposed to let them with no questions asked, so it stands to reason that if two consenting individuals hate each other and want to slug it out we should allow that too. Right?

    2. Re:Why Would You Be Against This by cosm · · Score: 1

      Yes. Why is that so hard?

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    3. Re:Why Would You Be Against This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have regulations to make sure two individuals who want a fight are genuinely providing informed consent and take responsibility for consequences, and that's where boxing and martial arts clubs come from.

      Your sort of stupid libertarian absolutism ethically justifies an app for the suicidal to meet with wannabe killers.

    4. Re:Why Would You Be Against This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that so hard?

      It just happens when I get in fights, okay?

      Oh wait, you meant... never mind.

  20. Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't boxing and wrestling matches...legal? They are sports.

    1. Re:Legality? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      They are also regulated by a judge, and have proven to take enough precautions to prevent or at least mitigate any genuinely serious injury.

    2. Re:Legality? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      But they're also fighting for money. You think boxing gyms have a doctor present at all times for sparring matches?

      Can't speak to the law everywhere, but where I live, if both parties agree to fight before the first punch is thrown and nobody is betting, it's no different from any other risky sport.

    3. Re:Legality? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      The English law on assault has an exception for "manly sports". It's not assault if you consent, and by taking part you are assumed to consent to violence so long as it's within the rules & customs of the game.

      You certainly don't need permission from a judge to have a sodding game of Rugby. mark-t is either delusional or he lives in a place full of utter pansies.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Legality? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I also think they're making some assumptions here. I know of no case where two mutually combative persons engaging in fisticuffs were violated, ever. If they failed to stop or resisted arrest then, sure. However, if they consented? I know of no cases that have been prosecuted. There may be an exception to this for domestic violence assaults though I'm not sure that the victim would have ever really given consent or was of sound enough mind to give informed consent in those cases.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Legality? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It could be a breach of the peace (I have no idea what you colonial types call it) if it was disturbing non-participants.

      But then if you chose a vicarage tea party as the venue you ought to be summarily shot for being a blithering idiot.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Legality? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I can agree. And, yeah, so long as there's no prize money - I think it's legal??? So long as you're consenting and of sound enough mind to do so. Even if you killed your opponent, you might not go to prison? I'm not really sure - I'd think you should be okay but we've got jury trials and passionate people with things other than the rule of law as their priority. I'd probably not want to risk it by ensuring that I stop when required or requested.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  21. The first rule of fight club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is you don't fucking tell anyone about fight club.

    stoopid nerds.

  22. SHOCKER!!! by Drunkulus · · Score: 1

    "a marketing stunt, a prank or (best case!) an unsubtle parody." How is this different from the rest of the internet?

  23. Damnit /.! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Funny

    The first rule of Rumblr is not to post about Rumblr...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  24. Five bucks says it's malware by kheldan · · Score: 1
    Subject says it all. Has anyone analyzed it yet?

    First rule about Botnet is: You don't talk about Botnet.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Five bucks says it's malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. Go go app.getrumblr.com, login and "chat" for a few mins and you end up at:

      http://vonhughes.getrumblr.com/

      Hello World,

      Rumblr started as a portfolio project to help us launch our creative consulting agency, von Hughes. We’re a team of college dropouts with backgrounds in marketing, design, and engineering. Rumblr came about organically as a funny idea amongst a group of friends, but quickly budded into an opportunity to showcase our branding skills. Within a day or two, VentureBeat picked it up as a news story and, within another day or two, it spread to over two hundred news outlets globally. We saw it as an opportunity to show the world our ability to produce a brand and market a product, and that’s what we did. This is our attempt to turn this entire story into something positive. We’ve collectively slept for twenty hours the last three days producing the web application, managing social media marketing efforts, and pursuing news coverage. Rumblr became a relevant topic in multiple countries, cultures, and languages.

      We understand that some of you were genuinely looking forward to using an app like Rumblr, and we’re sorry to disappoint. However, if you still are truly wishing to release some built-up angst, consider fighting more pressing issues such as gang violence, domestic abuse, and at-risk youth culture.

      Fight on,
      Matt, Jack, & Andrew

    2. Re:Five bucks says it's malware by thesupraman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      However what you actually did, rather than create a brand and market a product, was to cheaply troll the internet and get a cheap boost at the cost of lowering things one step further into the cesspool of marketing-no-matter-the-lie.
      Tell me, what value do you think you have created here?

      I wonder if you feel proud?

      Of course you do, you are America. Go America!

    3. Re:Five bucks says it's malware by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      Dude, go away. We've seen you post about compression and show your desperation and ignorance. We don't need it on every topic or news story.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  25. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    So why don't Uber ensure their drivers carry the correct license to take passengers for payment?

  26. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Things like boxing (and hockey) wind up being "prize fights"

    Fighting in hockey is nowhere near the level it was at a few decades ago. You don't see the kind of bloodbaths there once were.

    Except for a few thugs who often end up being more of a handicap to their team due to penalties, suspensions, etc, (Milan Lucic, I'm talking about you) there aren't nearly as many goons playing hockey any more.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  27. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1. Use Tindr/Grindr to fuck someone. They give you an STD. No lawsauit.
    2. Use Rumblr to fuck someone up. Lawsuit.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      If you don't wrap your junk, especially for a random hookup, you're a moron and you can't blame anybody else for it.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  28. Real Fight Clubs by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    There have always been real "Fight Clubs". They're called "martial arts schools". Precautions are taken so nobody dies, of course, and nobody's expected to fight way outside of their level, but the fighting is real. I've had ribs, nose, a finger and a collarbone broken in the past 30-plus years. The broken nose, by the way, was me trying to execute an elbow strike during my second year and punching myself in my own nose with my fist. The broken collarbone came from a waxwood staff (called a "gun" in Chinese).

    Since then, I can probably count the number of hits to the head I've taken on one hand. You've got to protect the meat.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Real Fight Clubs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're so tough and cool. Everybody likes you and wishes they were you.

    2. Re:Real Fight Clubs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your strip-mall suburban martial arts school isn't real fighting...

    3. Re:Real Fight Clubs by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Say, anyone know why they call them, "Anonymous Cowards"? I've never understood the reference.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Real Fight Clubs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say, anyone know why they call them, "Anonymous Cowards"? I've never understood the reference.

      I'm an oxy moron, you insensitive clod!

  29. Actual Article about it Actually being a hoax by thehossman · · Score: 1

    This was posted to slashdot after the "go live" time of the app/website, but only links to articles posted prior to the launch that speculated it was a hoax.

    One of the authors (Alfred Ng) of one of those articles wrote a follow up piece *after* the launch, with the actual details of what the hoax actually was (A marketing stunt) and what registered users saw when they used the app at launch...

    When the website went live at 5 p.m. on Monday, the app asked users to sign in using their Tinder, LinkedIn or create a new account. It matched all users up with a fighter named Dudecati. The user wouldn't be able to do anything but type back at the automated response. At the end of it, the bot tells users:

    "ok in all seriousness though you're wasting your time here," and then redirects you to the group's website.

    --
    -- The Hoss Man
  30. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Things like boxing (and hockey) wind up being "prize fights", are under heavy regulation, and are supposedly set up with enough safety procedures to avoid serious injury, with exceptions being considered errors, and dealt with accordingly.

    My boss is a 4th degree black belt in some martial art. I mostly work remotely or at client sites so I don't see him that often, but when I do it's about 1-in-3 odds that he will have a black eye, bruise or some other "serious" injury from sparring at the martial arts place.

    AFAIK, there's no regulation involved here. He doesn't hold a boxing license and there's no boxing commissioner present at his sparring sessions. People willingly show up and kick the crap out of each other, and apparently it's legal.

    I'm not sure why a "tinder for fighting" would be illegal in that light. Any liability would seem to be a civil matter between the consenting parties, with the exception of possibly some kind of manslaughter liability if you killed the other guy.

  31. What a dipshit dickhead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " If you're "throwing down" and seriously injure your opponent â" or, God forbid, he dies â" you cannot claim self-defense and you could be charged with crimes ranging from misdemeanor assault to homicide."

    What a dipshit dickhead. Consenual fighting is perfectly legal. What a twat...grow a pair!!!!

  32. Not illegal everywhere by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Fighting is legal in Seattle, unless it poses danger to third parties.
    https://www.municode.com/libra...

    If it's legal in one city, I'd hazard a guess it's not a felony. No one commenting here so far has referenced any law that says it's illegal in any jurisdiction.

    1. Re: Not illegal everywhere by drkoemans · · Score: 1

      This. Came here to say the same thing about Seattle. Not sure why everyone just assumes it is illegal and getting wound up about it. Here is video proof. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=...

    2. Re:Not illegal everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fighting is legal in Seattle, unless it poses danger to third parties.
      https://www.municode.com/libra...

      I'm not quite sure that says it's legal. It says that it's illegal in public unless either self-defense or licensed/authorized by law. The remaining part not addressed is fighting in private. Granted the rule is that anything not specifically made illegal is considered legal, but what that particular law doesn't tell us is whether or not there are any other laws that specifically address fighting in private.

      But in the case of their sample screenshot for the app, it clearly discusses fighting in public "meet me behind 5th ave deli parking lot". The map next to it appears to be Harlem, NY. Not sure what the laws are in NY, but I doubt fighting in public is legal there.

  33. Thought we had that already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, you aren't supposed to use Tinder to match people and beat them up when you meet? My bad!

  34. Illegal? by MakersDirector · · Score: 0

    In 2009, I went to Cuba - despite it being illegal for me to do so - and not just because it was illegal, but because I had been to thirty five countries by then and simply wanted to understand what a country held that would make it illegal for people like me to visit.

    A lesson learned in law.

    So let me get this straight. The author of this article is using 'it being illegal' as the chief argument about why the app is nonsense?

    What about actually trying it out?

    Personally. I am not a fighter. But I break laws all the time. When I can't afford to pay for something I hop the metro. When my shoe broke and I had absolutely no money to my name I stole superglue. Such a felon, right?

    Laws are there to guide the population. Not to dictate orders. If some people want to fight. Let them.

    To the creators or rumblr. Kudos. You may be filling a need. And if someone dies because they engage in this activity. Oh well.

    Like anyone would admit to who did it.

    Remember the first rule.

  35. pair with peeple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great followup to that Peeple app.

  36. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    What was that Paul Newman movie from the late 70s? Youngbloods?

    That was a fun movie.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  37. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    Found it on imdb. Slap Shot.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  38. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    And boxers practice just the same in the gym. It is still under a supervised system, rather than fighting in the street with random strangers.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  39. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're sure he's at the "martial arts place"? Perhaps ask him about "Project Mayhem".

  40. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My boss is a 4th degree black belt in some martial art.

    It's called Yoga.

  41. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice bitch-tits you've got there, Bob.

  42. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    Those aren't considered serious injuries. We're talking broken bones, and potentially life-long injuries.

    But, as was said by another, within a licensed sparring gym is a different matter. I'd imagine that it's supervised, there are medical-safety measures and procedures in place, including someone to stop the fight, and I'd guess that the gym is somehow licensed or registered for it.

  43. Try my website, Tempura! by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

    It's for meeting lightly battered women.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Try my website, Tempura! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not interested unless they're set in EVOO. I prefer women with a low smoke point.
      captcha: conjugal

    2. Re:Try my website, Tempura! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for meeting lightly battered sizzling hot women.

      FTFY.

  44. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er, no.

  45. Obvious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhJSA9PUAJ0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og7JS8mcp3c

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Cook
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vzo0iHrivVQ

    We know who already won.

  46. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Youngblood and Slap Shot are different movies aren't they? (with basically the same story?)

  47. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by Calydor · · Score: 1

    Er, yes.

    Am I playing the "List of credible sources" game right?

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  48. Good for having fun with neighbours by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    Just create an account and load in the profile your neighbour's pic. Then wait for a rumblr user to come close, and enjoy the fight...

  49. how do we know this is fake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everything about the write up seems like they're hoping it's fake... but there's no indication that it is.

    personally, whatever two people consent to should be fair game. why not have everyone fill out a digital waiver through the app and then go to town on each other? they can even set whatever terms they want through the app too... pure fisticuffs only or weapons? geez, seems like the app could facilitate a great many of these kinds of details.

    hell, we should bring dueling back... or fucking thunderdome. both parties need to consent so anybody can just refuse to participate. but it seems like we're increasingly living in a society where everybody talks too much shit. blah blah blah.

    we need to cut out some of that fucking verbiage and settle shit with some finality.

  50. It's a marketing stunt by erlando · · Score: 1

    It's a marketing stunt: http://vonhughes.getrumblr.com...

    --
    Remember, there are no stupid questions. But there are a lot of inquisitive idiots.
  51. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    What was that Paul Newman movie from the late 70s?

    The greatest hockey movie ever, Slap Shot.

    The Hanson Brothers!

    https://www.thestar.com/conten...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  52. Whee by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    Population Control just got a whole lot more entertaining.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  53. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

    Indeed. Waivers help the process.

    --
    Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
  54. Orwell and Palahniuk by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

    Damn it, Fight Club wasn't supposed to be an instruction manual!

    In other news, I wish I could +1 Funny this entire comment section.

    --
    Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
  55. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Irish dancing? AH that will be American taekwondo then.

  56. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    >There are plenty of places where boxing, cage fighting, etc... happens.

    These are licensed sports, generally heavily regulated - not just anybody can go, and if you go there are legal parts to the rules that are fairly well enforced.

    This is why deaths in fighting sports are quite rare events.

    Without those they would be a lot more common. Killing or maiming somebody with a punch is a lot easier than you think if you don't know what not to aim for. There are even regulations about the fitness and health level of the participants - sorry no entry if you're a serious alcoholic because a blow to the liver will probably be fatal.

    Doing this outside the purview of the law would definitely be assault (if nothing goes wrong - if anything does you can expect manslaughter or murder as well). In almost every jurisdiction I know off (and definitely in the USA) assault is a crime - not just a civil offense - and that means you cannot consent to it. The state charges you - not the victim, and the state has every right to do so even if the victim expressly does not wish them to (this is, in part, to prevent criminals getting away with it by scaring the victims). Of course in practice they will rarely press charges without a willing victim since the victim's testimony is very important to a conviction but they don't actually need it and in this case both parties will be getting charged anyway so that aspect falls away entirely.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  57. it can't be true because it's illegal! by slashdice · · Score: 1

    Nice logic there. I guess AirBNB and Uber aren't real, either.

    --
    Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
  58. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    Ahahah as if they are just available for anyone who wants them. You know the numbers are usually limited, and generally all taken.

    Maybe if licensing mattered so much, people wouldn't vote with their dollars for Uber. Maybe if the cab companies with the legitimate licneses that they lobbied and paid for should provide even comparable service?

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  59. No, it does not by allo · · Score: 2

    samzenpus fell for the app, we did not.

  60. Criminal facilitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come this "criminal facilitation" thing isn't used against the Pirate Bay? No need for outlawing hyperlinks or any other links.

  61. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    If you mean ice hockey when you say hockey, why don't you say so?
    There is a well respected sport that is called hockey and is not played on ice :)
    Americans ... how will we ever be able to understand you?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  62. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    The licenses for the BUSINESSES are limited.
    Not those for the drivers, every one can simlly apply and make a passenger transport permit.
    And Uber simply can BUY a license from another business and require its drivers to have the correct permits: AS ANY OTHER BUSINESS IS DOING!

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  63. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by rhazz · · Score: 1

    A mutual fight is probably not illegal until it is done in public (i.e. street fighting). Add money to the formula and other regulations probably apply.

  64. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    On the other hand, there is also the English common law concept of "volenti non fit injuria" which states that if you willingly place yourself in danger you can't then sue someone if you get hurt. So if you get a broken arm or leg in a football (soccer) game it's generally your tough luck, as you chose to participate in a contact sport. Of course, this doesn't mean you can just go out and kill someone with your bare hands, as that is not a normal part of the game.

    This fight club app is just a variation on organised boxing, so as long as the rules didn't say you could cripple or kill someone, you'd probably be all right in the UK.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  65. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    I could have sworn the "secret recipe for Uber" was that all those wonderfully regulated cab services actually suck and many have poor customer service: http://www.wbur.org/2011/02/15...

    Then Uber should be able to compete with them and win on quality without having to do anything illegal.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  66. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    There is a well respected sport that is called hockey and is not played on ice :)

    Citation needed.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  67. Re: Most obvious problem: its questionable legalit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Field hockey

  68. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Wow, if you never have heard about hockey go back into your cave.
    The german women's team is world champion most of the time ...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  69. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Not taxi licences. Driver licenses.
    In New Zealand they're available for people who pass background checks and have a good driving record.

    You need a passenger endorsement if you want to drive a taxi, bus, shuttle bus, limo, or do anything where you accept payment to drive someone else.

    Taxi licenses are different and only required if you want to park in taxi stands or charge per kilometre/minute. You don't need one for pre-paid trips.

  70. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    I don't see how this is supposed to make a difference to consumers, who are voting with their dollars against the regulations made by corrupt politicians at the behest of, and often written by, the very industries they regulate.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  71. Re: Most obvious problem: its questionable legalit by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Oh, field hockey. Why didn't you say so? Like lacrosse without the baskets on the stick,right?

    If you walk up to anyone on any continent in the world and ask them what "hockey" is, you think more people would describe real hockey or "field hockey"?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  72. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Because people who pay someone to drive them somewhere should expect the driver to be a good driver, not constantly breaking the law on the road, not a violent criminal and doesn't have a medical issue that could impact their ability to drive.

    http://www.nzta.govt.nz/driver...

  73. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by thecity · · Score: 1

    It depends on the state's mutual combat laws.

  74. Re: Most obvious problem: its questionable legalit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since almost no-one outside of North America plays Ice-Hockey, it's unlikely to be that

  75. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by OutOnARock · · Score: 1

    Old School Hockey for the win!!!!

  76. Re: Most obvious problem: its questionable legalit by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    since almost no-one outside of North America plays Ice-Hockey

    Oh come on. Seven of the thirteen Chicago Blackhawks centermen are from Europe: Sweden, Austria, Latvia, Finland, Russia, Czech Republican and whatever the hell the "SVK" are all represented and that's just among the centers.

    Do you know that there are professional hockey leagues in the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Slovakia, Sweden, Russia, Switzerland, Ukraine and the UK. Ice hockey, for decades, was the #1 sport in Russia (and may still be).

    Here is a list of the FIFTY-ONE countries that have national hockey teams

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Total ice hockey countries is over 100.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  77. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by metrix007 · · Score: 1

    Uber makes medallion type systems irrelevant, and it's about time.

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  78. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    Yeah, those were the faces I was seeing as I tried to remember the title. Loved those guys.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  79. Re: Most obvious problem: its questionable legalit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes counting the number of countries is every so useful. When you've got India in both.

    Hockey is India's national sport. Ice Hockey is probably played by a handful.

    ANd Americans don't even believe that metric either, since they continue to refer to its padded up, throwing a ball game as football. FIFA has more member countries than the Olympics.

    And when Sepp Blatter needs votes to stay President it probably has more member countries than the Earth does.

  80. Re:Most obvious problem: its questionable legality by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    No they don't :)
    What is next? Ships without Captains? Airlines without license?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.