Slashdot Mirror


Stanford Creates Tricorder-Like Devices For Detecting Cancer and Explosives (stanford.edu)

An anonymous reader writes: A new technology has promise to safely find buried plastic explosives and maybe even spot fast-growing tumors. The technique involves the clever interplay of microwaves and ultrasound to develop a detector like the Star Trek tricorder. The careful manipulation of two scientific principles drives both the military and medical applications of the Stanford work. First, all materials expand and contract when stimulated with electromagnetic energy, such as light or microwaves. Second, this expansion and contraction produces ultrasound waves that travel to the surface and can be detected remotely.

In a potential battlefield application, the microwaves would heat the suspect area, causing the muddy ground to expand and thus squeeze the plastic (abstract). Pulsing the microwaves would generate a series of ultrasound pressure waves that could be detected and interpreted to disclose the presence of buried plastic explosives. Solving the technical challenges of detecting ultrasound after it left the ground gave the Stanford researchers the experience to take aim at their ultimate goal – using the device in medical applications without touching the skin.

34 comments

  1. And cancerous explosives! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    ...also explosive cancers!

    1. Re:And cancerous explosives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need that to detect the presence of iSIS...

    2. Re:And cancerous explosives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weaponized cancer of the anus; what does the Geneva convention say about that?

    3. Re:And cancerous explosives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Warning: this explosive is known to the state of California to cause cancer.

    4. Re:And cancerous explosives! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      It would certainly detect the presence of old people carrying cardiac pills.

    5. Re: And cancerous explosives! by ememisya · · Score: 1

      Don't heat it too much nyao.

  2. Holy fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One minute Jim, let me check to see if BOOOOMMM!!! Sorry Captain, I guess I didn't anticipate that microwave radiation coupled with ultrasonic pressure waves might detonate the plastic explosives. Gurgle....gasp.... croak.
    Bad, bad idea.

    1. Re:Holy fuck by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      "Dammit..... Jim.... " *eyes close*

  3. 50/50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They missed my cancer, but found all the explosives in my rectum.

    1. Re:50/50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Captain! We're losing containment!!"

  4. Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully they know it'll only sell if it makes Beedleedleedle sounds.

  5. Re:starvation deception #1 killers world wide stil by sexconker · · Score: 1

    You forgot the "fight for you Bitcoins" link.

  6. Rife by labnet · · Score: 2

    This story reminds me of the work of Rife.
    The short story is that Rife invented a hetrodyning optical microscope that mixed UV light incident on the subject of interest,such as cancer cells, where the mixing difference would reproduce visible light but allow the study of cells while still alive. He then used modulated RF sources to find the resonant point of these cancer cells to mechanically destroy them. The conspiracy theory goes that the established medical community destroyed his work/equipment as his results were too effective.

    --
    46137
  7. We've found TNT, but worse by queazocotal · · Score: 1

    It's metastasised.

    1. Re:We've found TNT, but worse by bobbied · · Score: 2

      Stage 4 high explosives.... Self solving problem... I'm sorry sir, you have milliseconds to live once this blows up..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  8. Not touching the skin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it necessary for it not to touch the skin?
    The fact that it can detect cancer is the important function of the device, not whether you can hold it a foot away.

  9. Induction? by eth1 · · Score: 1

    Because microwaves inducing currents in unknown explosive devices is a wonderful idea?

    1. Re:Induction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes.
      Why would it not be a good idea?

      If an unknown bomb gets rigged to explode with scanning, all it will do is destroy the immediate area.
      Given that a robot would be doing this anyway, it just means that a robot gets blown to bits.
      That'll be a million dollars plus tip.
      Of course, terrorists would be stupid enough to think this would even matter in the grand scheme of the World Polices funds.

  10. technological dowsing rod by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    You can have my ADE 651 when you pry it from my cold dead exploded hands!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  11. Hmmm by avandesande · · Score: 1

    So that's how the Tricorder worked. Thank you /., I learn something new every day!

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  12. Tricorder "Like" device? by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Really? A Tricorder "like" device? Isn't an MRI, a CT, Ultrasound and X-ray a Tricorder LIKE device? Heck, add to that EEG and EKG devices, as are metal detectors, video recorders and cell phones.

    So why do we insist on coupling some new reordering of existing technology with the public persona of Star Trek? Easy, it's an attempt to garner PR brownie points by leveraging something that's already popular in some circles. Frankly I'm growing tired of this ploy... Can't we just call them what they are, portable sensing devices and leave the fictional Star Trek device out of this? It ruins the story of Star Trek a little, each time we do this.

    In reality, we will never have a "real" tricorder because they are FICTIONAL to start with, devices used to advance the plot line of a story, much like transporters, warp drives and dilithium crystals.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:Tricorder "Like" device? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Isn't an MRI, a CT, Ultrasound and X-ray a Tricorder LIKE device?

      Not really. If it's not handheld and portable, it's not tricorder-like.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Re:starvation deception #1 killers world wide stil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot the MOO COWS meme.

  14. Apparently the slow news has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Complete nonsense meant to amuse the few individuals who were unaware Fallout 4 was released.

  15. Tricorder-like by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I believe the tricorder's main attributes were:
    1) it can scan, analyze, or detect anything
    2) it doesn't exist

    I wonder which of these attributes they implemented?

    "We've been working on this for a little over two years," Khuri-Yakub said. "We're still at an early stage but we're confident that in five to ten to fifteen years, this will become practical and widely available."

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  16. Star Trek Sensors by khelms · · Score: 5, Funny

    Data: Captain, sensors are picking up 14,387,254,183 gnats on the planet's surface. Picard: What about that Romulan warbird that just activated their cloak 100 meters behind us? Data: We are unable to detect them.

  17. That sounds way cool by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 1

    I am taking a signals class right now, and we are learning about filtering noise.

    This sounds like a way noisy signal. It is super cool that they think they can still gain useful information

  18. I've got Good News and Bad News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doctor: Hey! Sorry that took awhile for me to get back with the results. I had to take of some things first. I've got some Good News and some Bad News.
    Patient: Hmmm. What's the Good News?
    Doctor: The "Good News" is that you do NOT have cancer!
    Patient: That's awesome. Like I said, it runs in the family so I was afraid I might have it too. But, um, what's the bad news?
    Doctor: The "Bad News" is that you have a bomb inside of you. The building has already been evacuated. I'm outta here.

  19. can this device be used to identify buried canon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because if so, it ought to be more specific as whether we're talking about a tricorder or a medical tricorder.

  20. Vaporware by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    Ultrasound cannot image easily the inside of the skull: the video showing the proof of concept of the device is just wishful thinking.
    Furthermore the amount of RF-generated heath needed to make the tumor visible would exceed the safety levels of EM exposure for humans.
    Concerning the possibility of detecting buried explosives, I must say that I have more than 20 years of experience in R&D work in related fields, and I would be very surprised to see this gadget to detect anything useful in real ground.
    It is probably a technology designed to get some more DARPA grants, and wait for interesting times...

  21. American illiteracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A new technology has promise to"

    Huh? Typical illiterate American idiot.

    1. Re:American illiteracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with that phrasing, unusual as it may be.

      Try shortening it to "A new technology has promise." That's perfectly correct grammatically.