Slashdot Mirror


How Hollywood's Hedy Helped Heighten Handhelds (hackaday.com)

szczys writes: Hedy Lamarr is a household name for the wrong reason. Her name is known as a Hollywood actress, but her legacy is in your pocket and reaches far more people than her movies. She was a brilliant thinker who plied her skills during World War II, developing technology that could help to win the war. Her patent wasn't used at the time, but is a foundation of spread-spectrum which is used in the radio modules of your cellphone: WiFi, Bluetooth, GPS, and others. This frequency hopping concept sat unused for decades before being added to the most ubiquitous of wireless connectivity methods.

67 comments

  1. Thank you, Hedy. by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, it's Hedley!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Thank you, Hedy. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 0

      No, it's Hedley!

      From TFA, it's Hedwig Eva Maria Kiesler.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:Thank you, Hedy. by olsmeister · · Score: 2

      +1 Blazing Saddles reference!

    3. Re:Thank you, Hedy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No, it's Hedley!

      no its becky

    4. Re:Thank you, Hedy. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Informative
    5. Re:Thank you, Hedy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always loved the fact that the guy who sung the theme tune didn't know it was for a comedy film, he thought it was a serious western about a couple of heroic guys going out and winning against the bad guys, so he put his whole heart into the singing, making it just that little bit more excellent than if he'd known what sort of film it was destined to be a part of.

    6. Re:Thank you, Hedy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey where are da white wimmin at?

    7. Re:Thank you, Hedy. by Rassleholic · · Score: 2

      No, it's Headcrab!

      --
      Not noteable, IMO a rubbish article.
    8. Re:Thank you, Hedy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you worried about? This is 1874. You'll be able to sue her!

    9. Re:Thank you, Hedy. by khelms · · Score: 1

      'scuse me while I whip this out!

  2. Patently Encumbered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if it hadn't been tied up in patent limbo, we could have had all those advancements decades earlier?

    Man patents suck.

    1. Re:Patently Encumbered by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      I think it was encumbered not by the fact that it was patented, but (per TFA) by the fact that it was classified.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:Patently Encumbered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if it hadn't been tied up in patent limbo, we could have had all those advancements decades earlier?

      Man patents suck.

      But woman patents don't!

    3. Re:Patently Encumbered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you mean "Woman patents suck".

    4. Re:Patently Encumbered by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      The patent expired in 1958.

    5. Re:Patently Encumbered by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Exactly, (though that came after the war)... And some things, like truly effective encryption (if it exists at all) is born secret

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:Patently Encumbered by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

      Many applications of frequency-hopping spread spectrum require complexity that isn't practical with vacuum tubes. Commercial applications needed to wait for integrated circuits.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    7. Re:Patently Encumbered by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      You know - none of that matters if you publish prior to getting informed what you just published is "classified". Oops, cat is out of the bag, barn, and farm.... Kind of like Phil....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    8. Re:Patently Encumbered by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      They developed the system for the war effort originally. Thus the secret classification.

    9. Re:Patently Encumbered by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Not really since the patent was based on a working prototype. Commercial applications had to wait for desperation driving a search for a solution to potentially congested airwaves. See also the current "cable tv" appliances that have IPv6 addresses only due to a rollout larger than the remaining unallocated continuous IPv4 address space.

    10. Re:Patently Encumbered by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of what they did and why. What my statement was is that if you, as an individual, publish something like Phil Zimmerman did with PGP (which was subject to these types of laws) then you have effectively neutralized these types of laws if that is your intent. Some will say this is bad, or even illegal. Phil was subjected to some intense scrutiny and an investigation, but ultimately was effectively "just" harassed as no legal action was taken. Much like DVD Jon, or any of the others were attempted to be harassed into silence most likely as warnings to others in the future. However, it appears that freedom of speech still reigns supreme, however much some try to chill it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    11. Re:Patently Encumbered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemme get this straight. In the middle of WWII, a new technology is developed that might make a difference in determining the fate of all of Europe, if not the whole world (as far as they knew at the time), and you're suggesting they should have published it prior to the government being able to classify it so that we might have had cellphones in the 60-70's instead of the 80's? Really?

    12. Re:Patently Encumbered by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      That seems to about cover it.

    13. Re:Patently Encumbered by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      If I recall, the prototypes involved mechanical devices that were kept in sync with clockwork. Useful for shorter time periods like controlling a torpedo, but not all that useful for something needing long term stability.

    14. Re:Patently Encumbered by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what your point is since the patent dates to less than ten years before solid state transistors were commercially available.

  3. Agh by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Funny

    Asinine Alliteration Accentuates Author's Atrociously Antiquated Awareness About Awesome And Able Actress

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Agh by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Surely she's famous for suing Mel Brooks over the Blazing Saddles

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  4. This is a great article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But how can we encourage more women and minorities to join STEM fields? We're discouraging future Hedy Lamarrs with the toxic 'bro culture' that pervades programming.

    1. Re: This is a great article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Target Hollywood stars, obviously.

    2. Re: This is a great article! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1
      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  5. Look it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always seemed strange to me to give someone credit for inventing something that was invented around 40 years before they "invented' it.

  6. Google Doodle on November 9, 2015... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  7. Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This frequency hopping concept sat unused for decades before being added to the most ubiquitous of wireless connectivity methods.

    Frequency hopping has been used by the military long before cell phones were invented.

    Hedy Lamarr helped win the Cold War.

  8. Horrible! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Heavy "H" Heaping Hinders Helpful Headlines. Have Heart!

  9. spread spectrum and player pianos by binarstu · · Score: 2

    The invention was quite interesting, too -- a mechanical implementation of spread spectrum that was based on player piano technology.

  10. The title's words all have the same letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While you may think, like some journalists, that this is the best trick in the business, it's rather stupid and distracting and shows a lack of professionalism.

  11. Plus by terrywirth5 · · Score: 0

    Hedy Lamar was a babe. Win, win. On the other hand, I am married to a smart babe and at times it can be a bit of a challenge. I do not want to get into the details but let your imagination run wild.

    1. Re:Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for affirming that men think women in engineering should be judged on their looks, and their work disregarded...

    2. Re:Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for affirming that men think women in engineering should be judged on their looks, and their work disregarded...

      Or.. both separately. along with many other attributes.
      Was she a talented musician too?
      An accomplished cook?
      A witty and insightful conversationalist?

      All these things? none of them? I never met the lady, and am not into celebrity gossip, so no idea. But also, no reason to dismiss the idea of her being exceptional in more than one area.

      And who is disregarding her work?

      This is a woman who got to the top in a very competitive cut throat profession where looks are a primary consideration to this day. This does not happen to pretty but stupid people.
      AND
      She came up with the idea of frequency hopping to make it impossible to jam torpedoes. And quite possibly had more ideas still classified, or never filed.

      BOTH statements can be present at the same time in the same person. Smart AND pretty, not smart OR pretty.
      I have no problem reconciling both attributes to one person, male or female.
      Or do you imagine women can only have one exceptional aspect, or their poor little brains might asplode?

      Condescending fuckwit.

  12. Pure hype by kamapuaa · · Score: 0

    It's a great story, but her invention was never used. It's really a huge stretch it really relates at all to current spread-spectrum technology. Even if you think it is related, spread-spectrum as developed did not base their ideas on her invention, and it's unlikely they were even aware of it.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Pure hype by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      It's a great story, but her invention was never used. It's really a huge stretch it really relates at all to current spread-spectrum technology. Even if you think it is related, spread-spectrum as developed did not base their ideas on her invention, and it's unlikely they were even aware of it.

      Depends.

      Hedy Lamarr's spread spectrum, called Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) is used in Bluetooth and early WiFi (802.11, no "b") is the first known implementation. Basically, Hedy based it on a piano roll used by player pianos in order for the Navy to control torpedoes without them being jammed.

      The other form of spread spectrum, Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) is much more modern - its patents are owned by our dear friend Qualcomm, who used it to create CDMA as an alternative to FDMA and TDMA mechanisms.

      Qualcomm owns DSSS because they basically invented it, and they're quite recent.

      FHSS is still spread spectrum, and it still accomplishes the goal of spreading the signal out and interference on a channel only affects the signal for a little while.

      FHSS is easier to do if your communications are channelized and you can switch between channels easily (which is why it's older). DSSS requires more computation and initial acquisition of the stream is a lot harder since you're not entirely sure where in the chip code you are so you not only have to pick the right PRNG seed, but you need to advance the code until your correllator starts detecting a signal.

      (The chip codes are carefully selected so the correllator only produces a noise output if the chip code is wrong).

  13. Frequency Hopping vs Direct Sequence by Phil+Karn · · Score: 4, Informative
    I don't mean to denigrate her contribution in any way, but Lamarr's frequency-hopping spread spectrum is not the one used in CDMA mobile phones. It is used in Bluetooth.

    Lamarr invented "frequency hopping" while CDMA cellular and GPS use "direct sequence". Frequency hopping is just what it sounds like: a narrowband transmitter is continually retuned to a different radio channel. Unless the receiver tuning follows the same sequence at the proper times it cannot receive the transmission.

    Direct sequence XORs a narrowband signal with a high speed pseudorandom "chip" sequence, and the receiver undoes this operation by XORing it again by the same sequence properly synchronized in time. It closely resembles a keystream-type encryption system, though the "keystream" is not necessarily secret. The main difference is that direct sequence is a wideband signal while, at any instant, a frequency hopped signal is still narrowband.

    Each method has advantages. Frequency hopping can be especially resistant to strong narrowband jamming, so it's a favorite of military systems (Lamarr's intended use). Direct sequence is easier to use with coherent modulation so it tends to use transmitter power more efficiently, and it can often provide precise timing and positioning as a side benefit. Or, in the case of GPS, as its primary purpose.

    While CDMA mobile phones were very important in the 1990s and 2000s, it is now being replaced with LTE (Long Term Evolution), which uses OFDM - Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing. So do many other modern terrestrial digital communication systems including DSL, HD Radio, DVB-T (but not ATSC), WiFi and DRM (Digital Radio Mondiale).

    1. Re:Frequency Hopping vs Direct Sequence by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Thank you! Every time this comes up, I end up writing a rebuttal along the same lines.

    2. Re:Frequency Hopping vs Direct Sequence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely. And several of the very first radios built using this technology were constructed in a Rockwell lab in Anaheim California in the 70s. The radios used (roughly speaking) 7 kilohops per second over a 12.8 MHz chunk of spectrum within a band from 30 MHz through 90 MHz. This was done for the US Army. The US Army went on to dumb it down a little for their SINCGARS radios. By 1980 frequency hopping was in the US military communications arsenal. Last I knew this was well before cellphones were. The radios I helped build in the 70-75 time frame preceded the cellphone by a few years and the cellphone use of frequency hopping by even more years.

      Hedy was far ahead of her time. And as a woman I found it particularly delightful to work on the two designs in which I participated as an RF engineer.

      {^_^}

    3. Re:Frequency Hopping vs Direct Sequence by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

      As the above AC notes, the Lemar patent really seemed to be aimed at a slightly different type of application than current cell phones. Besides it being a frequency hopper and not direct sequence, the intent of the frequency hopping was intended to evade detection while modern cells phone use spread spectrum for better bandwidth utilization.

    4. Re:Frequency Hopping vs Direct Sequence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most mobile phones in the world are GSM not CDMA though aren't they?

  14. Why is this news now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an old, well-established fact.

    In other technology news, the Soviets launched a satellite, Sputnik, into space. No idea yet if the USA can match that advanced technology, but the Space Race is on!

    1. Re:Why is this news now? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      This story comes up a lot. I always assumed it was common knowledge amongst engineers. But not as many engineers on slashdot anymore.

    2. Re:Why is this news now? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      this seems to come up on tech sites yearly. how very forgotten..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  15. The true history can be found here by Skewray · · Score: 0

    The true history can be found here: http://destroyhistory.com/ .

  16. Compare and contrast by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

    Here is a photo of Hedy Lamarr. Naked.

    https://jnpickens.files.wordpr...

    Here is a photo of Phil Zimmerman. Fully clothed.

    http://cdn.androidbeat.com/wp-...

    Now who wants to argue that there shouldn't be more women in tech?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Compare and contrast by bgarcia · · Score: 0

      I so want to moderate this as "+1 Troll".

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    2. Re:Compare and contrast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hard to believe more women don't choose STEM careers, when they could work with guys like you.

  17. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alliterations are so fucking stupid!

    1. Re:Ugh by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean: Alliterations are awfully asinine?

    2. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ouch, man. Very ouch.

  18. Who? by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Who is Hedy?

  19. Total Nonsense, she didn't invent anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I cannot believe that this crap is actually believed! It is wrong in so many ways. It's also insulting to the women who actually worked hard to create real advances in science like say Radia Perlman, who aren't attractive celebrities!

    1. Frequency hopping was first mentioned by Tesla 30 years before. It was used in WW1 by the Germans, there were patents on frequency hopping in the 30's. It was used by both the USA and Germany in WW2.

    2. The invention was by George Antheill who had created a musical piece by synchronizing player pianos. At the time when asked she said

      “Hedy modestly admitted she did only ‘creative work on the invention,’ while the composer and author, George Antheil, ‘did the really important chemical part.‘
    Hedy was not too clear about how the device worked, but she remembered that she and Anthiel sat down on her living room rug and were using a silver match box with the matches simulating the wiring of the invented ‘thing.’ She said it was lots more fun being scientific than going to the movies.”

    - See more at: http://patentlawcenter.pli.edu/2011/12/05/the-truth-about-hedy-lamarr/#sthash.LV86Y6iE.dpuf

    She got dual credit on the patent, but apparently everyone forgets about George.

    3. As others point out frequency hopping is NOT the basis on model cell phones.

    A couple of issues, why did the USA keep her patent secret you ask? Because they were using spread spectrum and they didn't want that to get out.

    She did think of it right? Well probably not since her ex-husband was an arms dealer in Austria so she probably heard him talking about it.

    Really folks, what's the chance of someone who had no noteworthy science background, who introduced herself to Antheil because she wanted a boob job and never did anything again, whose "invention" looks like the work of someone else (Antheil).

    Please STOP repeating this crap and tell people the truth.

    1. Re:Total Nonsense, she didn't invent anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were awarded with a negative score, for telling the truth.

  20. To be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the earliest mention of frequency hopping in the open literature is in radio pioneer Jonathan Zenneck's book Wireless Telegraphy (German, 1908, English translation McGraw Hill, 1915), although Zenneck himself states that Telefunken had already tried it.

    The German military made limited use of frequency hopping [] in World War I []

    A Polish engineer, Leonard Danilewicz, came up with the idea in 1929 []

    During World War II, the US Army Signal Corps was inventing a communication system called SIGSALY, which incorporated spread spectrum in a single frequency context. However, SIGSALY was a top-secret communications system, so its existence did not become known until the 1980s.

    The most celebrated invention of frequency hopping, though it came decades after others had come up with the concept and technologies making use of it were in existence, was a patent awarded to actress Hedy Lamarr and composer George Antheil,--Wikipedia

    So she didn't invent it (if invent = first invent) and it didn't sit unused for decades before nor after her. Still, cool story. She's definitely the glammest of all inventors of frequency hopping.

    1. Re:To be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. ate the Wikipedia link

  21. Interning at TheRegister.co.uk lately? by rainer_d · · Score: 1

    At least, it looks like that

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  22. Household namej by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hedy Lamarr is a household name for the wrong reason."

    That's moronic. No one knew about frequency hopping unless you were a radio geek and even today it's unknown in most households. Hedy Lamarr was a household name because she was a popular actress and labeled the most beautiful woman in Europe with several personal life dramas that made news headlines. Those things make someone a household name.

    1. Re:Household namej by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Also, it was classified for a few years during and after the war.

      So... she's known for being an actress, a very public field, more than she's known for something that she was sworn to secrecy for,. This is a problem, or even a surprise, why?

  23. She gets more credit for this every year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She tried to use spread spectrum (actually 88 piano keys) to keep torpedoes from being destroyed. It was later adapted by someone (some unknown non-actress guy) for use with conventional radio transmissions. Other (unknown non-actress guys) developed it into the system you use for cell phones. Oh but Hedy! Ignore all those non-actress guys who actually developed it into something practical and useful! Hedy!

  24. Now for the Reddit deluge by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Now we'll see two or three times the volume of this tidbit on Reddit /r/todayILearned.