Slashdot Mirror


Tape Disintegration Threatens Historical Records, But Chemistry Can Help (nautil.us)

An anonymous reader writes: Modern storage methods are designed with longevity in mind. But we haven't always had the scientific knowledge or the foresight to do so. From the late 60s to the late 80s, much of the world's cultural history was recorded on magnetic tapes. Several decades on, those tapes are disintegrating, and we're faced with the permanent loss of that data. "The Cultural Heritage Index estimates that there are 46 million magnetic tapes in museums and archives in the U.S. alone—and about 40 percent of them are of unknown quality. (The remaining 60 percent are known to be either already disintegrated or in good enough condition to be played.)" Fortunately, researchers have worked out a method to determine which copies are recoverable. They "combined a laptop-sized infrared spectrometer with an algorithm that uses multivariate statistics to pick up patterns of all the absorption peaks." Here's the abstract from their research paper. "As the tapes go through the breakdown reaction, the chemical changes give off tiny signals in the form of compounds, which can be seen with infrared light—and when the patterns of reactions are analyzed with the model, it can predict which tapes are playable."

14 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. Cryogenic storage by frnic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Freeze them all and wait until a 3d Printer can scan and reconstruct them at the atomic level...

  2. Not a new problem, of course by cirby · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I ran into a related issue about 25 years ago.

    I was working in a college media library, and there were several stacks (over 70 tapes in total) of 2" reel-to-reel video tape from the 1960s and 1970s - recordings off air from Public Television, mostly. Some of them were of local shows nobody even seemed to remember, and others were from live performances at the Dallas station or of live feeds from PBS. There was a live Alvin Ailey dance troupe local show from the late 1960s, if I recall correctly.

    The problem was that they were recorded in a rare two-inch format - and only four machines that used it were ever even built (no, it wasn't 2" quadruplex, there were still lots of those at the time). I couldn't find a working machine, and the only one I could dig up was missing major parts (like the heads). So unless someone builds a new one from scratch just to read those tapes, all of that is going to disappear - if it hasn't already.

    1. Re:Not a new problem, of course by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      couldnt the tape be still framed one at a time in a modern scanning format to bring it back? (the video portion at least) im not sure how to pull the audio but being analog wouldnt there be a way to pull that as well?

      not pretty and much harder 25 years ago, but there seems there is some kind of solution today no?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:Not a new problem, of course by Tapewolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      couldnt the tape be still framed one at a time in a modern scanning format to bring it back? (the video portion at least) im not sure how to pull the audio but being analog wouldnt there be a way to pull that as well?

      The audio would be pretty easy to pull off - it's going to be a straight linear audio track so you could probably just stick it in a regular 24-track studio recorder. Pulling the video is the hard part because practically all 2" video machines use a segmented scanning technique with the head-wheel angled at 90 degrees to the tape. If these are helical scan, the tracks are going to be laid down at 15 degrees or something weird like that, and you'd need to build a custom video head for it. Maybe it's possible to take a C-format head and machine a suitable drum for it, I don't know.

      Earlier I asked if it was an IVC recorder - however, reading it again he said that only 4 existed so I'm pretty sure they were recorded on an Ampex 8000, a 1961 helical scan machine that Ampex made prototypes of but never went into full production with or something. So yes, that's going to be a rare bird indeed.

    3. Re:Not a new problem, of course by cirby · · Score: 2

      That solution might work - but it would have to work on possibly-already-dead tape from the 1960s and 70s (which is often turning into dust already). There's a lot of archive stuff that's been sitting in old storage rooms for decades that's pretty much just a random pile of chemicals by now.

      There's also a real possibility that they all got thrown away after I left - since there was nothing to play them on (and not much chance of a replacement at that point), it wouldn't surprise me.

      A side note: this same library had a number of nitrate films in the collection, including what was supposedly a copy of one episode of "Victory At Sea," the classic documentary. In particular, they were stored in the middle of the REST of the collection. Extremely flammable and old, degrading nitrate films. When I found the first one, I opened the can CAREFULLY on the concrete loading dock, found it was just mush, and arranged to have it destroyed safely. I spent a bit of the next couple of days finding another dozen in similar condition and disposing of them too.

      At least videotape doesn't catch fire so easily.

  3. They can save my TRS-80 tapes? by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank god, I had some awesome BASIC skillz back then that I though were gone for good.

    1. Re:They can save my TRS-80 tapes? by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 2

      Will you share it with the Vic20 Denial community?

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
  4. Historical Alzheimer's by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    buh-bye.

  5. It's time for a global public digital archive by presidenteloco · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A technical and logistical and financial project whose primary goal is longevity (in the multi-hundred-year sense) of that which it stores.
    It should not be accomplished by individual media that are designed to last.
    Rather it should use network redundancy cleverly and have protocols designed to ensure enough geographically distributed copies always exist.
    It would have to carefully consider "readability, interpretability" assurances, such as very standard simple formats and protocols, and the methodology of storing the displaying / interpreting environment and code as well as the data. Emulated 1980s arcade games, now available and playable online, are good examples of this.
    Sort of an Internet Archive on steroids. Crowdfunded?

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  6. Re:Modern storage methods are designed with longev by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    Maybe we really don't need to retain all of this information.

    Probably not most of it - but you never know for certain.

    What is missing these days is the concept of active archiving. The days of taking a book and putting it on a shelf as archiving are long gone. This was probably first noticeable then organizatyions started finding need to stockpile ancient computers as a way to retrieve old data from the large floppy discs and other old school data memory. But then we started getting to where this story pick up, with the coatings flaking off of tapes, whether sound data, or the discs.

    And its a maddening issue, as there are ancient tapes that are actually on paper, but still sound good, and some that the coating is almost gone. As well there are issues with print trough, which has been a problem with old video tapes, as the tape sits nest to it's neighbors above and below it, teh magnetized parts can transfer a little bit, and the image can get a little fuzzy over time.

    And we can't get complacent at all about CDs and DVDs I don't know if the young'uns remember at all about the great writable CD shortage era - this was when 1 CD cost around 11 dollars. And tehy were going bad quickly. I don't know if they were trying to reduce demand or if they were havienthat much difficulty making them, but it was difficult to get any for a while, and when you found one they were rationend out like WW2 tires.

    Then ther ewere the CD devouring fungi that ate the data from the unsealed sides of the CD. Bottom line is you should hope you don't need data stored on CD's from the mid 90's.

    So now if something is worth archiving, it needs to be in a form that you can continue to re-archive often.

    People often bust NASA's chops whne tehy lose old data. I understand perfectly how this happens. re-archive old data, or hire a new accountant ot oversee where all of the pencils go, and the accountant wins every time, while the data slowly fades away.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  7. M-Disk by godel_56 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Blu Ray version of M-Disk might be worth a look, as they're supposed to last for 1000 years. Also "backup" a spare drive that's capable of reading them.

    If not I suggest printing all the data out on boxes of blue and white stripey paper.

  8. Re:Why... by mukinrestak · · Score: 2

    DING DING DING, we have a winner!. Copyright has made us lose more shit than it ever helped provide. I'd personally like to murder the people responsible for me not being able to see all of Buster Keaton's movies. Anymore I think a copyright of over 10 years is excessive, and we need an automatic exception for any archival efforts.

  9. No, modern storage methods are even worse by gweihir · · Score: 2

    A HDD is good for maybe 5-10 years, but USB-sticks, unpowered SSDs and writable optical media may become unreadable after as little as a year. Unless you keep several redundant copies and verify and re-copy regularly, you are going to lose that data. The one readily-available exception is, surprisingly, archival-grade _tape_.

    This basically shows that the story writers have really no clue what they are talking about.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:No, modern storage methods are even worse by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Archival grade BluRay or M-DISC will be better than tape. Aside from anything else, it can be read back without contacting the media at all, and is designed for very long term storage. It's also very likely to be readable decades in the future with commonly available hardware. Consider that CDs are over 33 years old and still easily readable on commodity hardware. Getting compatible tape drives is likely to be harder and more expensive.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC