Slashdot Mirror


"Clock Boy" Ahmed Mohamed Seeking $15 Million In Damages

phrackthat writes: The family of Ahmed Mohamed, the boy who was arrested in Irving, Texas has threatened to sue the school and the city of Irving if they do not pay him $15 million as compensation for his arrest. To refresh the memories of everyone, Ahmed's clock was a clock he disassembled then put into a pencil case that looked like a miniature briefcase. He was briefly detained by the Irving city police to interview him and determine if he intended for his clock to be perceived as a fake bomb. He was released to his parents later on that day and they publicized the matter and claimed Ahmed was arrested because of "Islamophobia".

96 of 818 comments (clear)

  1. Litigious Much by slackerfilm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, I liked Clock Boy but this is just dumb. And $15 million? I sure hope he plans on donating a lot of that to science

    --

    throw the baby out. The bathwater is cold

    1. Re:Litigious Much by rhazz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Suing for such a ridiculous amount just shows that he is truly American.

    2. Re:Litigious Much by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >> $15 million? I sure hope he plans on donating a lot of that to science

      Or...he could STFU and leave it with the local school district...which would use it to teach science.

    3. Re: Litigious Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What did you like about him? His ability to order a clock off the internet, his ability to take it apart, his ability to have his family involved with Cair, perhaps his fathers ability to be involved in failed lawsuits against the city and its manager for the past 2 years, or maybe his ability to get suspended less than 48 hours after being let back in from a previous suspension at a different school?

    4. Re:Litigious Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So I'm white and got in trouble all the time as a kid for being a nerd and building/assembling poorly designed shit that looked like a bomb or otherwise dangerous even though it was completely benign. Where do I collect my hundreds of millions of dollars, or are you all a bunch of filthy racists?

    5. Re:Litigious Much by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

      >> by "science" you mean creationism/intelligent design

      Christ, what crappy school did you attend? Irving schools look pretty mainstream to me:

      http://irvingblog.dallasnews.c...
      http://www.irvingisd.net/site/...
      http://www.irvingisd.net/Domai...

    6. Re:Litigious Much by hawguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I say give him and his father the $15M in the form of Hellfire missiles from a Predator drone. Or 3.

      Money well-spent IMO.

      See how fast some other "bright boy" tries that sort of stunt again after *that* sort of "payoff"!

      Strat

      I don't see how that would help, he'd surely get into trouble again if he tried to bring a Hellfire missile to school, even if he has all of the paperwork for it.

    7. Re:Litigious Much by drnb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If by "science" you mean creationism/intelligent design, Pi=3, genetics is wrong, evolution is a sin, and scientific theories are just "crazy ideas someguy once had that can't be proven"

      You do realize that lots of religious schools, even in Texas, teach evolution even with respect to humans, teach the big bang theory, teach that the discoveries of science are not in conflict with religion, that science and religion search for answers in orthogonal fields.

      FYI, genetic science and the big bang theory began with members of the clergy.

    8. Re:Litigious Much by theArtificial · · Score: 5, Informative

      History of the Big Bang Theory cites a Belgian Catholic Priest named Georges Lemaître as the originator of the theory.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    9. Re:Litigious Much by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 5, Informative

      For the genetics part see Gregor Johann Mendel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... Mendel was a monk.

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    10. Re:Litigious Much by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      I agree. I thought the school administration and the police were pretty dumb in this case, and I'd even have supported a minor lawsuit for some expenses related to moving schools and some punitive damages to prevent idiocy in the future, but fifteen million is ridiculous.

    11. Re:Litigious Much by njnnja · · Score: 5, Informative

      Please excuse the karma whoring but you did ask: Gregor Mendel was a monk who did pioneering experiments on heredity. Although it seems obvious in retrospect, even after Darwin first published the theory of natural selection it wasn't until it was put together with Mendel's work that evolutionary theory as we understand it today came about.

    12. Re: Litigious Much by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I think I can answer, for everyone, what people liked about him. His desired to take apart a clock he bought.

      Did he really have that desire? Were his motives pure? I dunno. But that's what people are identifying with.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    13. Re:Litigious Much by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bump.

      To name three things that happened to me off the top of my head:

      1. Accused of criminal hacking (by, you guess it, gaslighting asshole managers^H^H^Hadministrators) and had my computer privileges revoked for a few weeks. Told me I was lucky they didn't have me arrested by the FBI and imprisoned in the big city. I was also lucky my parents didn't believe their version of events.

      That one turned out to be blatant gender discrimination. I later found out they had no problem with what I was doing, as long as it was an empowered young woman doing it.

      Oh, edit: 1.5. After I warned the librarian responsible for the open-use computers that they were infected with a virus, I was given a stern warning and told I may have broken the acceptable use policy.

      2. Accused of plagiarism because obviously a however year old I was at the time couldn't possibly program something in Pascal. They were never quite able to figure out what and who I plagiarized.

      3. Had a calculator game I'd put perhaps 3 or 4 weeks of work into erased after leaving my calculator unattended. That was definitely a lesson in keeping backups! (As in I didn't have a single backup anywhere.) That one almost escalated to a lawsuit, but to her credit, the teacher that did it became apologetic once she realized what she had actually done.

      On the other hand, I was never actually arrested.

      On the other, other hand, my motives were authentic unlike "Clock Boy," who seems to have had questionable motives. I also learned that computers are magical palantirs into cyberspace powered by waldos and that any display of talent on my part would get me labeled a dangerous criminal hacker.

      On the 3rd other hand, at a different school, my talent got me a summer and after school job. I'm certain I must have been a misogynerd who prevented a more talented woman from being offered that job. (I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case, since my specialty is software development and the only woman in the class specialized in hardware and network, which would have been more relevant to the job.)

    14. Re:Litigious Much by drnb · · Score: 4, Informative

      You could also say "The big bang theory began with the Belgian Army", because he was also in that.

      He was no longer in the Army. However he was teaching at a Catholic university at the time.

    15. Re:Litigious Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      #whitelivesdontmatter

    16. Re: Litigious Much by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Well, I think I can answer, for everyone"

      No... You cannot.

    17. Re: Litigious Much by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cool, what else is admirable about him?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    18. Re:Litigious Much by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

      You could also say "The big bang theory began with the Belgian Army", because he was also in that.

      Which would only be relevant if people were complaining that the Belgian Army was an enemy of science. However given that at the moment they seem to be deployed on the streets of Brussels trying to keep religious fanatics from killing people I don't think this is something we need to worry about.

    19. Re:Litigious Much by drnb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With respect to Lemaître we are talking the 1920s. He had studied civil engineering, math and physics. Had a doctorate. He was a WWI vet, a former officer. I don't think becoming a priest was necessary for him to find room and board.

    20. Re:Litigious Much by neoritter · · Score: 2

      And Isaac Newton spent a lot of time trying to figure out when Armageddon would happen (sometime after 2060 apparently) so what's your point?

    21. Re: Litigious Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The whole thing pained me so much. Everyone acted like the 'Little Boy Who Would Get Us To Mars' had been traumatized so much that he would now give up his future career as a scientist.

      The kid took a clock out of its plastic case and mounted it into a different case. WTF?

    22. Re:Litigious Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other, other hand, my motives were authentic unlike "Clock Boy," who seems to have had questionable motives ascribed to him without supporting evidence.

      FTFY.

    23. Re:Litigious Much by drnb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He was not doing cosmological research when in the army, however he was doing cosmological research as a priest and a professor at a catholic university. Research done with the full knowledge and support of his church, including some funding. A church that fully embraced his discovery. A church that continues to participate in and support serious cosmological research.

    24. Re:Litigious Much by drnb · · Score: 2

      And Isaac Newton spent a lot of time trying to figure out when Armageddon would happen (sometime after 2060 apparently) so what's your point?

      If we apply relativistic theory to that 2060 calculation do have more or less time?

    25. Re: Litigious Much by Noah+Haders · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, people admired that he built a clock, when in fact he just took apart a working clock to make a shitty clock that looked like a bomb, then took it to school to "show people."

    26. Re:Litigious Much by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You DO realize that he's moving to Qatar right? The worst school in America isn't gonna be as religiously batshit and backasswards as a country under Sharia.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    27. Re:Litigious Much by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2

      I agree with the school and police paying out for being idiots, preferably the individual administrators and police not the departments. I dont agree with this kid and family getting it. Split the different and pay the layers and give the rest of it to a registered charity of their choosing.

      We realy need school admins and police to worry about being this blatantly stupid. The kid was told to put it away multiple times, teachers are fully capable of telling him to give me that and I'll give it back when it's time to go home, at the office, or make the parents come get it, that would be a reasonable response no different than a cell phone or video game.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    28. Re:Litigious Much by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm white and I agree, but then I'm a Nihilist :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    29. Re:Litigious Much by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Qatar is Amsterdam compared to Texas. You know, they only have two things in Texas, right?

      Really? I didn't know they had mandated religious courses in public schools in The Netherlands. They sure do have mandated classes in Qatar for religion though. Texas on the other hand, doesn't.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    30. Re:Litigious Much by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

      Science is a process of acquiring knowledge (i.e. the scientific method). The church can support science all it wants. Anyone can support science. Nazis supported science. This doesn't make Catholicism scientific for the same reason it doesn't make Nazism scientific.

      I resent the disingenuous attempt to legitimize religion by associating it with religion. Religious people are able to be scientists because people are apparently able to harbor conflicting ideologies. An atheist can be a priest. A creationist can be an evolutionary biology teacher. I was actually taught evolution in the 11th grade by a catholic science teacher who did not believe in evolution, and he did a perfectly good job.

    31. Re: Litigious Much by jasno · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A few of us current engineers got started as kids doing stupid things that only resembled real engineering. I used to spend my allowance at radio shack buying random components only to hook them up to a 9v battery and a metal file to make sparks.

      Take away the backstory about how his dad probably used the kid for politics and political gain, and take away the family's scary religion, and you have a guy a lot of us would sympathize with. We were weird kids who did stupid things and scared people.

      I guess if I sat around listening to the right wing shitstorm over the issue I might feel differently. As much as I am appalled at the family's lawsuit and monetary demands, I have to admit that they did a good job trolling a bunch of stupid school administrators and small town law enforcement. The over reaction of the school and cops opened them up to this. Seriously... interrogating a kid without his parents? I remember when they tried that shit on me.

      --

      http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    32. Re: Litigious Much by Sun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's because people are ignorant.

      The learning process starts where he did. Take something apart, try to put it together. Hailing him as a genius was being carried away, but labelling him a terrorist was even worse. This is how children learn. It's how we want children to learn.

      Anyone who expects a child that has never learned proper electronics to build an electronic clock from scratch on first attempt is simply ignorant.

      Shachar

    33. Re:Litigious Much by MercTech · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, how much money do you take from the idiots when they blithered their way to being a national laughing stock?

          I'd sue for 30 million then settle for sacking the idiots that pressed charges, a formal public apology from the school board, and lunch at MacDonald's.

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
  2. That won't last long... by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The school certainly overreacted, but...

    1) the kid was not arrested, nor did he suffer any "damages" in light of the celebrity and overly-friendly treatment from the President, and
    2) once the jury hears about his overly-activist father and the lawyer's insinuation that the whole thing was a set-up?

    I'm not seeing this one going very far.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:That won't last long... by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OH, almost forgot - won first place in a science prize in which he bumped off a teenaged kid who found a cheap/easy means of detecting *ebola*?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:That won't last long... by slimdave · · Score: 5, Informative

      ... the kid was not arrested ...

      Purely on a factual level, yes he was arrested, after being questioned for an hour and a half (how is that even possible?), and was taken to a detention centre, fingerprinted, photographed, and questioned further.

      He was not charged. Possibly that's what you meant.

    3. Re:That won't last long... by grahamsz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I assume there's some desire to make it punitive. He was only treated that way because he was perceived to be a Muslim - I bet the school district can't point to a bunch of other cases where white kids have brought in electronics projects and had the police called. I imagine i'm not alone in the slashdot demographic as someone who brought random electronics to school, yet I never got anywhere close to arrest because of it.

      I don't think it matters if the whole thing was orchestrated to show the school district was discriminatory. It appears that they are, and they should have to pay the price of that.

    4. Re:That won't last long... by jklovanc · · Score: 2

      I don't think it matters if the whole thing was orchestrated to show the school district was discriminatory. It appears that they are, and they should have to pay the price of that.

      The problem is that it is not the school district that will pay for it but it is the students that will pay through fewer programs and lower funding levels. This suit in effect penalizes student for the actions of staff.

    5. Re:That won't last long... by grahamsz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe that he is, but i'm not sure the school has the right to demand to know the religion of students.

      Honestly it's likely because he had brownish skin. I wouldn't by surprised if a Christian from the middle east would face much the same discrimination.

    6. Re:That won't last long... by grahamsz · · Score: 2

      That's fucked up in its own way, but doesn't seem to be a discriminatory policy

    7. Re:That won't last long... by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Um, the majority of nerds I knew growing up had the same exact issue. The only difference is none sued.

      They same exact issue? They were questioned for 90 minutes, accused of making a hoax bomb, then taken away in handcuffed to be processed at the police station? Are you *sure* it was the same?

    8. Re:That won't last long... by grahamsz · · Score: 2

      Isn't that the very nature of it?

      If everyone is treated the same way for bringing a toy gun to class then it's not discriminatory
      If everyone is treated the same way for fucking around with their electronics project in class then it's not discriminatory.
      If everyone is treated the same way for wearing a miniskirt to class then it's not discriminatory.

      The onus is on the school district to show that they always act this way.

    9. Re:That won't last long... by WheezyJoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      THIS. My bet is they did not once ask him to name his religion or what religious establishment his parents drag him to each week. Nor would they have cared what his answer was. It wouldn't have mattered if had a stack of Joel Osteen books in his locker and a card-carrying member of the "700 Club"... he LOOKS LIKE one of 'em terrerists ya see on TV, and had the NERVE to come to school with a thing with wires and flashy lights on it.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    10. Re:That won't last long... by PRMan · · Score: 5, Informative

      He actually was invited to visit the fair—which he declined—and Olivia's ebola test won first prize.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    11. Re:That won't last long... by istartedi · · Score: 2

      My first thought was to wonder how she knew the test worked. For example, if I wrote a C parser I could feed known valid C programs into it for testing. If you make an Ebola test, a 16 year old can't just feed Ebola into it for testing. This article does a good job of explaining how she gets around that. The test doesn't need the whole virus. It just needs a protein that the virus makes. I don't think you can run down to the drugstore and get that either, but at least you could probably order it from somewhere without causing an international incident.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    12. Re:That won't last long... by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've heard of him. Like the terrorists in France, he was the son of immigrants. Proof that sealing the borders is the *only* option.

    13. Re:That won't last long... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      "Disassembled clock parts wire together in an adhoc fashion and found in an ordinary box unrelated to time keeping looks like the detonator to an IED."

      Or it looks like some shit a 14 year old might throw together, being unlikely to have training in bomb creation and access to the explosives required to make that little box dangerous. It depends if you have a basic grasp of Occams Razor and a rational thought process,or watch a lot of Fox news and believe Muslims are the latest scourge of ne'er do wells looking to kill whitey and rape his woman.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  3. Integrated very well by Brama · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How much more American can you get?

    1. Re:Integrated very well by andymadigan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, he's moving to Qatar, so apparently he doesn't like the idea of being American anymore. I can't blame him for that, but I have no sympathy for someone who complains their civil rights have been violated and then moves to a country that still practices slavery.

      He shouldn't get a cent.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
  4. NO WAY... by SuperDre · · Score: 3, Interesting

    F-ing moneygrabbers, they got a lot of positive attention because of it, he had his 15 minutes of fame..

  5. Fantastic way to lose all sympathy by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No way the school district is going to pay 15 mill to this family that has already emigrated to Qatar. It will probably cost a few thousands in lawyer fees. On the other hand, that clock boy is going to lose all sympathy from most people. It lends credence to the accusation that the boy's father, a presidential candidate in south sudan or chad or some such place is quite media savvy and has manipulated the media and gamed the system.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Fantastic way to lose all sympathy by kheldan · · Score: 2

      It lends credence to the accusation that the boy's father, a presidential candidate in south sudan or chad or some such place is quite media savvy and has manipulated the media and gamed the system.

      Precisely. As soon as I saw this story on Firehose, I lost all sympathy for this kid, as he lost any and all credibility that he might have had. This had to have all been a scheme cooked up by the kids' father, and this is the end-game. They should get precisely ZERO dollars, and perhaps counter-sued for being a nuisance and conspiring to create these shenanigans.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    2. Re:Fantastic way to lose all sympathy by kheldan · · Score: 2

      Oh come on. The whole thing was fishy to start with. What I and others are saying at this point, is that the kids' father probably concocted the whole thing to troll the school and the cops into 'detaining' or 'arresting' or whatever word you want to use to describe it, for the sole purpose of this end-game, being the ability to sue someone for 'how poorly his son was treated'. If it looks like BS and smells like BS, then it's probably BS. The key factor here is the impending lawsuit. If all they wanted was to be left alone to live in peace they wouldn't bother.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  6. Lawyers by ardmhacha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am sure that this is all his own idea and no lawyers were involved in the decision to sue for $15 million.

  7. Dad of Ahmed is an Islamic Supremacist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed and Robert Spencer once debated on the topic, “Does Islam Respect Human Rights?” The results were so bad for him that after the debate, The American Muslim pleaded with Muslims not to debate Spencer. In any case, this debate is one indication that Mohamed Elhassan has been trying for several years to make his bones as a warrior against “Islamophobia.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8BLtBFeyyo

    The debate starts at 31:48, after an interview with Walid Phares. On a separate note, this Sudanese Islamic activist once claimed that that incident would “spread Islam” in America

    That kid may have been innocent, but his father is an Islamic activist trying to intimidate anyone who has any concerns about Islamic activism.

  8. Reads like a script by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This whole story since the day after the incident reads like a script from exactly what the tinfoil hat crowd said would happen. His father is laughing all the way to the bank and laughing at the foolishness of gullible Americans. They not only duped the SJW crowd, but even duped Obama, and they have already cashed in on their successful plan and sounds like they will continue to do so via a lawsuit. Even though there weren't any actual damages, it will be cheaper for the school district to settle, and then raise taxes so that they can afford to keep the school functioning for the other students in the district.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Reads like a script by hawguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This whole story since the day after the incident reads like a script from exactly what the tinfoil hat crowd said would happen. His father is laughing all the way to the bank and laughing at the foolishness of gullible Americans. They not only duped the SJW crowd, but even duped Obama, and they have already cashed in on their successful plan and sounds like they will continue to do so via a lawsuit. Even though there weren't any actual damages, it will be cheaper for the school district to settle, and then raise taxes so that they can afford to keep the school functioning for the other students in the district.

      And maybe while they are at it, they'll put policies in place to prevent such an overreaction the next time -- as will school districts across the country.

      Without the threat of a lawsuit and large payout there'd be no incentive to this school (or others) to change, they'd continue to overreact to minor things and escalate to the police without reasonable cause.

      Maybe the kid doesn't serve such a large payout, but the school deserves to pay it.

    2. Re:Reads like a script by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They not only duped the SJW crowd, but even duped Obama

      Obama is a member of the SJW crowd. The more I listen to him the clearer it is he has never a thought of his own. He has been spooned leftist nonsense from birth and learned to repeat it, sometime eloquently. We should just put a picture of him next to 'Social Justice Warrior' in the urban dictionary.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  9. Yes, he was arrested [Re:That won't last long...] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Informative

    The school certainly overreacted, but...

    1) the kid was not arrested

    Yes, he was. He was taken away from the school by the police in handcuffs. That's an arrest.

    I think what you meant to say was, the kid was not charged. That's correct. He was arrested, but released without charges.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  10. I Should Be A Judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Clock Boy: I was arrested for making something that was designed to look like a bomb. Even though this was made illegal so that the cops wouldn't have to spend all of their time chasing down false alarms, I still want $15 million.

    Judge Me: This is pretty much the most frivolous lawsuit that has ever come across my desk. I'm fining you $15 million for filing such a frivolous lawsuit. If you fail to come up with the $15 million in the next 5 minutes, you will be spending all day, every day making little rocks out of big rocks until you do come up with the $15 million. Case dismissed. Have a nice day.

  11. Step to the right direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps this case will be dismissed or jury will decide not to award damages.

    However this will be an example. There was a story recently where two arab speaking US citizens were not admitted to the plane, because somebody feared.

    http://news.yahoo.com/two-men-kept-boarding-us-plane-speaking-arabic-023330187.html

    These two fellow American,s US citizens would have been better off recording the encounter, missing the plane and then suing for bona fide discrimination and would have won big time.

    This paranoia needs to stop and one or two cases with proper settlements would help.

    1. Re:Step to the right direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the case of Ahmed, I think a lot of people were quick (and right) to jump the gun on the discrimination part.

      However, as more information came to light about his father, it started to look more and more like a setup. Does this make the situation worse? indeed. Considering the racial tensions with police lately, It wouldn't surprise me if this was meant to increase Ahmeds father's standing among his peers rather than Ahmed.

      Still, I if this happened again I probably wouldn't try to tear down Ahmed for what amounts to a clock in something that looks enough like a hollywood bomb, but might be more suspicious of the motives. The original social media pictures showed a Ahmed being taken away by the police, not the clock.

    2. Re:Step to the right direction by cbraescu1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Purely on a factual level, yes he was arrested

      Actually, he was *NOT* arrested. He was detained.

      --
      Catalin Braescu
      Ofaly.com
    3. Re:Step to the right direction by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      Actually, he was *NOT* arrested. He was detained.

      He was perp walked in handcuffs, taken to the station, fingerprinted, photographed, and questioned for over an hour. On planet is that *NOT* arrested? Did y'alls leave your brains parked by the front door?

    4. Re:Step to the right direction by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

      Actually, he was *NOT* arrested. He was detained.

      If you're being booked, you've been arrested.

      Of course, the police report also reads "Arrestee being in possession of a hoax bomb at MacArthur High School." Maybe you should call the Irving police and explain to them how you belive that he was not arrested.

  12. What is the option by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, suing a school just de-funds the school, but what is the option? How else can you force the school to come to terms with the fact that it's principal is a braying ass? You're not allowed to sue a school to force it to re-train or replace a bad teacher or administrator.

    1. Re:What is the option by jklovanc · · Score: 2

      Perhaps sue for a reasonable amount? Maybe a few thousand plus court costs? Perhaps requiring the school officials found culpable be fired? Suing for $15M is just pure greed as all it does is take money away from students.

      You're not allowed to sue a school to force it to re-train or replace a bad teacher or administrator.

      As far as I know a lawsuit settlement can be just about anything. Do you have references showing that requiring teacher/administrators to be fired is not allowed?

    2. Re:What is the option by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You could sue for a realistic damages figure. If its about principle and not money than wining a case like this should be enough in itself. I can understand why he might want to get the school to admit wrong doing or have a finding against them that they did wrong.

      How exactly was he harmed to the tune of $15 Million? I mean seriously if nothing else thanks to Obummer deciding to make a political football out of him he gained from it.

      Now if they family said he now needs therapy for anxiety or something, and does not want to go back to that school, and sued for oh I don't know $300 - 400k and an apology for the cost of private school, therapy and pain suffered; I'd say well lets see what comes out in court or if the district settles.

      $15 Million on the other hand is a naked cash grab. 15 Million isn't about fair compensation.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    3. Re:What is the option by sjames · · Score: 2

      $15 million might be intended to be a scary figure designed to prompt a settlement offer. It may also reflect that a judge is more likely to adjust the amount down than up.

    4. Re:What is the option by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      How exactly was he harmed to the tune of $15 Million?

      Since when did a large award require large harm?
      http://www.nydailynews.com/new...

  13. Is he suing his sister too? by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    ...since they'd removed the cuffs, and she asked them to re-cuff him to she could take the much-ballyhoo'd picture? Surely being re cuffed induced some of his "suffering"?

    For those countering the suspicion that surrounded this kid's actions with "why would he possibly put himself through this? What did he have to gain?"...there's 15 million reasons for you.

    --
    -Styopa
  14. Re:WHERE CAN I CHECK MY WHITE PRIVILEGE?!? by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I keep trying to play on the relentless oppression of my German people since the Roman empire and how this is a crime that hasn't been addressed and has been repeated over the centuries, from the 100 years war, the Napoleonic wars, the anti-German discrimination against German Americans during and after WW I, the internment of Germans during WW II.

    My people are being picked on, and it's been going on FOR MILLENNIA and I deserve a check in the mail.

  15. gone and stay gone by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The kid and his dad are provocateurs who deliberately baited the school teachers. Dad's sounds like he's been wanting to leave for a long time, probably spent his time dreaming this s**t up. They get nothing and need their visas pulled as undesirable aliens.

  16. Citation required. by Brannon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This smells like bullshit to me.

    1. Re:Citation required. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      He did not receive first place, he was just the featured "scientist" of the photo in which the finalists appeared.
      http://mashable.com/2015/09/22/ahmed-mohamed-google-science-fair/#1U20iipN1sqm

  17. Sympathy only goes so far. by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The school district acted inappropriately. A written apology is warranted. But even I want to tell the kid's family to GTFO at that price tag.

  18. Cool ransom note Ahmed by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Want to bring it to the White House?

  19. Citation needed. by Brannon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a good story and all, but is it true?

  20. What if it was a bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He was not making a alarm clock - as was widely reported.

    Rather, he took an off-the-shelf alarm clock, and made it look like a bomb. He did this very deliberately.

    Should the school have ignored, what could have been a bomb, because the kid was a Muslim?

    What sort of litigation would there have been if it was a bomb, and the school did nothing?

  21. Bullshit. by khasim · · Score: 4, Informative

    Assuming there was not communication among the staff that knew it was just a stupid clock to those other people, I can see who it would meet a standard of 'reasonable suspicion' to justify an arrest.

    Of course you do. But that's only because almost every person believes that THEIR opinion is a "reasonable" one.

    I remember back in the day (I'm old) when a student would bring something distracting to school the teacher would confiscate it and the student collect it at the end of the day.

    At worst, a student's parents would be called in.

    But students were never arrested for bringing toys to school. That's just stupid.

  22. Bringing a hoax bomb to school is illegal ... by drnb · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... the kid was not arrested ...

    Purely on a factual level, yes he was arrested, after being questioned for an hour and a half (how is that even possible?), and was taken to a detention centre, fingerprinted, photographed, and questioned further.

    He was not charged. Possibly that's what you meant.

    Bringing a hoax bomb to school is illegal. Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple Computer, was arrested and spent some hours with law enforcement when he brought a hoax bomb to his high school. A box that ticked, and then ticked faster when it was moved.

    As for whether what this kid did was a hoax bomb, any Iraqi / Afghanistan vet can explain to you how the detonators of IEDs are sometimes made from the components of off-the-shelf consumer devices. So, its not unreasonable to see disassembled clock parts in a negative light.

    1. Re:Bringing a hoax bomb to school is illegal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In 1975 I was in the 4th grade in Natick Massachusetts going to Johnson Elementary. https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=johnson+elementary+school+natick+ma

      We where putting on a play that year in celebration of 1976 the bi-centennial of the country. We were reenacting George Washington's crossing of the Delaware river and our teacher had asked us to bring in props that could be used as guns.

      My father had a bolt action .22 hanging in the garage in a cloth canvas case. He had the rifle since he was a teenager from Ohio living on a farm. I thought that would be perfect to bring in. Without asking anyone, when leaving for school I went into the garage and swung the rifle in the case over my shoulder and walked to school which was only a few blocks away. Nobody said a word about a 9 year old carrying a rifle.

      I walked into school and went right to the teacher in charge of the play. The teacher said that we couldn't use something like that and was looking for more like wooden toy rifles. I zipped back up the case and carried it to my class. My teacher asked me what I was doing with it and explained that it was supposed to be for the play.

      No police were called, no parents were called. I wasn't sent to the principals office or even home. My 4th grade teacher Mr. Etters was going to put the gun in the storage closet and for me to come get it after school was over instead of leaving it by the coat rack where everyone hung their coats in a row. Which I thought was fine.

      After school, I got the rifle back and walked home like a normal school kid would. Gone are those days.

      We used to bring firecrackers to school too and set them off in the playground there where now is a baseball diamond. Not once ever got in trouble for that either. Those were the days.

  23. Yes, it has happened to "white guys" ... by drnb · · Score: 2

    Would it have happened to someone who isn't brown skinned I don't know, ...

    Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple Computer knows. He was arrested as a high school student for having a hoax bomb. A bomb that "ticked" and then "ticked faster" when moved.

  24. Re:Money isn't enough by phrackthat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The police don't have to prove that anyone thought it was a bomb. They only have to show that there was probable cause to believe that Ahmed intended for the device to be perceived as a bomb. Given that his sister had been suspended for threatening to blow up the school and Ahmed had been suspended just two days prior at another school and the fact that the clock was not his design and clearly not intended to function as a clock (as the housing, which looked like a briefcase, would keep one from reading the clock face), they should have little to no problem to show probable cause (which under the law is not 51% probability, just a substantial possibility).

  25. Venom by ichthus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who is responsible for my fear of snakes? Venomous snakes.
    Who is responsible for my Islamophobia? Jihadists/Islamic "extremists"/Islamic terrorists.
    If Muslims want to decry rampant Islamophobia, they should stop being the assholes of planet Earth.

    --
    sig: sauer
  26. We had it, he lost it by alvieboy · · Score: 2

    All started with arrest of a young man at school for a hand-made, digital clock brought to school. Ended up not being that hand-made, was just some reassembly of some parts. Not much interesting, actually.

    It caught attention due to alledged racism or religion issues (still to be confirmed?). Even the White House and President of USA have spoken on behalf of this young, intelligent man.

    Which apparently was not that intelligent, techically speaking.

    And now he seeks damages of, what ? 15 million ?
    I would agree if he'd seek for 5 to 10K. But even then, after all publicity he got around him, probably not so much.

    There's a word for what he (his family) is seeking. The word is "extorsion".

    He had it (a plausible reason). He lost it. Nohing more to see here, really.

  27. Scientific method was also promoted by clergy by drnb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What, PRECISELY does him being a Monk have to do with religion not being antithetical to science? Because science means questioning (and looking for the answers in evidence, IOW "that which is seen"), ...

    Yeah, the scientific method, guess what ... in Europe various members of the clergy were partly responsible for its widespread adoption. A bishop in London comes to mind, don't recall the name. Sorry, most Christian denominations don't see science and religion as being in conflict, they study orthogonal topics. These religions specifically state that the discoveries of science, the observations of the workings of nature, are not in conflict with faith.

  28. Okay now I give up by chispito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I defended this kid before, thinking that it sucks to get misunderstood and just because his dad is an obnoxious pot stirring lawyer doesn't mean the kid had anything to do with it but this is just stupid. I hope they get counter sued and lose hard.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  29. Re:A cheaper solution by wisnoskij · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That just stupid. They should of blown him up, then said that he suicided himself with his briefcase bomb.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  30. So you admit the claim is BS. by Brannon · · Score: 2

    He didn't win first prize and didn't bump off a teenage kid who created an ebola detection kit. He hogged the spotlight, that's fair criticism but it's very different than what was claimed.

  31. Self awareness? by Uberbah · · Score: 2

    Until Islam chills the fuck out this will continue.

    Islam isn't busy murdering people with robot planes in Central American, on the other side of the planet from where they live. Islam didn't bomb two hospitals in two months. Islam hasn't overthrown democracies around the planet.

    So again....self awareness much?

  32. No! by s.petry · · Score: 2, Informative

    Being arrested requires that charges be filed. Ahmed was not arrested and not charged with any crimes, he was detained. Your twenty minutes is plucked out of the air and meaningless. Twenty minutes for a vehicle stop? Okay. Twenty minutes for charges relating to weapons or drugs? No way is that twenty minutes. The legal limit varies, but 24 hours is generally the limit that you can be detained without having charges filed (at which point you are arrested).

    Ahmed was hauled off and _DETAINED_ for a reason. YOU may not agree with the reasoning, but that does not mean there was no basis. How people keep modding this lie up when law dictionaries are pretty easy to find is astounding (https://www.law.cornell.edu/). Well, not really.. it suits a narrative.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:No! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Being arrested requires that charges be filed.

      Incorrect. You're 'detained' of the officer stops you for any reason. You're 'under arrest' if you don't feel free to leave, if the police transport you anywhere, or uses force to prevent you from leaving. The officer requires 'reasonable suspicion' to detain you, and requires 'probable cause' to arrest you, but it DOES NOT need to lead to charges. The officer can reasonably believe you were commiting a crime, then turn out to be wrong, or have new evidence come to light without it having been false arrest.

      Your twenty minutes is plucked out of the air and meaningless.

      Actually, it's a rule of thumb applied by the SCOTUS. Google it a bit and you'll find all sorts of case law, opinions, and the like.

      Otherwise, google 'detention versus arrest' and you'll find all sorts of legal jurisprudence about it. Like this. Or this. Or even this.

      TLDR: You can be 'detained' on suspicion. If you're not free to go, if the officer moves you, or if the officer starts calling in backup, drug sniffing dogs, and the like, you're under arrest. If he develops 'probable cause' to believe you've committed a crime, he can arrest you.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  33. Insult! by CanEHdian · · Score: 2

    You... you... you've insulted me. I'm hurt. I hurt, and my soul hurts!
    Here's $15,000,000.00
    Oh, now I'm OK!

    --
    When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
  34. Blaming the victim by codeButcher · · Score: 2

    Gotta love muslims*. Move to a certain country ostensibly for a better future, then try to change that country and society to be the same as the one left behind.

    I know one shouldn't blame the victim, but in many cases the so-called victims of islama"phobia" weren't just innocently walking along minding their own business.... And I for one feel it is very applicable to also take a hard and critical look at the victim's actions that led to them wanting to be labeled victims.

    * = I also know I shouldn't stereotype and should have probably written "some muslims". It's just so sad that the daeshbag minority is so visible and vocal, while the silent, conservative, hard-working, intelligent, empathic majority are quietly working along being productive members of the societies they find themselves in.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.